Abstract
Introduction
The human malaria parasite, Plasmodium vivax, is proving more difficult to control and eliminate than Plasmodium falciparum in areas of co-transmission. Comparisons of the genetic structure of sympatric parasite populations may provide insight into the mechanisms underlying the resilience of P. vivax and can help guide malaria control programs.
Methodology/Principle findings
P. vivax isolates representing the parasite populations of four areas on the north coast of Papua New Guinea (PNG) were genotyped using microsatellite markers and compared with previously published microsatellite data from sympatric P. falciparum isolates. The genetic diversity of P. vivax (He = 0.83–0.85) was higher than that of P. falciparum (He = 0.64–0.77) in all four populations. Moderate levels of genetic differentiation were found between P. falciparum populations, even over relatively short distances (less than 50 km), with 21–28% private alleles and clear geospatial genetic clustering. Conversely, very low population differentiation was found between P. vivax catchments, with less than 5% private alleles and no genetic clustering observed. In addition, the effective population size of P. vivax (30353; 13043–69142) was larger than that of P. falciparum (18871; 8109–42986).
Conclusions/Significance
Despite comparably high prevalence, P. vivax had higher diversity and a panmictic population structure compared to sympatric P. falciparum populations, which were fragmented into subpopulations. The results suggest that in comparison to P. falciparum, P. vivax has had a long-term large effective population size, consistent with more intense and stable transmission, and limited impact of past control and elimination efforts. This underlines suggestions that more intensive and sustained interventions will be needed to control and eventually eliminate P. vivax. This research clearly demonstrates how population genetic analyses can reveal deeper insight into transmission patterns than traditional surveillance methods.
Author Summary
The neglected human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax is responsible for a large proportion of the global malaria burden. Efforts to control malaria have revealed that P. vivax is more resilient than the other major human malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum. This study utilised population genetics to compare patterns of P. vivax and P. falciparum transmission in Papua New Guinea, a region where infection rates of the two species are similar. The results demonstrated that P. vivax populations are more genetically diverse than those of P. falciparum suggestive of a parasite population that is more resilient to environmental challenges, undergoing higher levels of interbreeding locally and between distant parasite populations. Unique characteristics of P. vivax such as relapse, which allows different strains from past infections to produce subsequent infections, may provide more opportunities for the exchange and dissemination of genetic material. The contrasting patterns observed for the two species may be the result of a differential impact of past elimination attempts and indicate that more rigorous interventions will be needed in efforts to control and eventually eliminate P. vivax.
Introduction
Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum are responsible for the majority of the human malaria burden worldwide. Malaria control and elimination initiatives have had enormous success, preventing an estimated 1.1 million deaths and approximately 274 million cases between 2001 and 2011 [1]. P. falciparum has traditionally attracted the greatest interest, as it is responsible for the majority of malaria deaths, while P. vivax has been relatively neglected. However, the classification of P. vivax malaria as “benign” has been revised in recent years as reports of severe vivax malaria have become commonplace in scientific literature [2,3]. Indeed, this species is estimated to be responsible for up to 300 million episodes of clinical malaria each year, predominantly in malaria-endemic regions outside sub-Saharan Africa [4]. Alongside the acknowledgment that P. vivax is of major global health significance, control programmes have revealed that this species is more resistant to control measures than P. falciparum [5]. Several unique features of P. vivax biology are thought to facilitate evasion of control efforts, including: relapse [6,7], the early appearance of transmission stages (gametocytes) [6,8] and a more rapid acquisition of clinical immunity [8,9]. P. vivax transmission is therefore likely to be more stable over time and during control efforts, when compared to P. falciparum [9].
Population genetic analyses using microsatellite markers have revealed important insights into malaria epidemiology, with genetically diverse populations suggesting endemic transmission [10–12] and clonal population structure signaling epidemic expansion [10–12]. The genetic diversity of P. falciparum populations is strongly associated with regional levels of transmission, thought to be the result of increasing proportions of multiple clone infections and consequent genetic recombination (outbreeding) in the mosquito vector [11,13,14]. P. vivax challenges this paradigm, maintaining high levels of diversity even in areas of low transmission [13–19]. Furthermore, P. vivax populations have consistently shown greater levels of genetic diversity than those of P. falciparum parasites circulating in the same region [15–19]. In South America, these differing patterns of diversity can primarily be explained by epidemic P. falciparum transmission leading to clonal expansion, whereas transmission of P. vivax is stable and hypoendemic [15,17]. In an area of South East Asia (Pursat, Cambodia), diversity of P. vivax was higher than P. falciparum despite a similar case prevalence (among all symptomatic malaria cases, 52% are caused by P. falciparum, 44% by P. vivax and, 4% by mixed infections) [17,20] however these numbers suggest higher P. vivax prevalence in the community since a lower proportion of P. vivax infections lead to clinical symptoms than P. falciparum. These findings raise important questions about how P. vivax diversity is generated and maintained, the relationship between diversity and endemicity and what consequences this knowledge may have for national control programs.
Genetic diversity secures evolutionary fitness, increasing the potential for adaptation to changing environments [20,21]. Indeed, genetically diverse parasite populations have greater potential to resist antimalarials [21–23], vaccines, and host immune responses [12,22–26]. Studies of the population structure of sympatric P. falciparum and P. vivax on local scales and at differing levels of transmission are needed to define potential drivers of genetic diversity in P. vivax. Population genetic studies are also necessary to guide malaria control and elimination strategies by tracing routes of transmission and the sources of epidemics [12,24–27], by identifying locations where the risk of reintroduction (gene flow) is lowest [27–30] and by monitoring drug and vaccine resistance [28–33].
On the north coast of Papua New Guinea (PNG) both P. falciparum and P. vivax are highly endemic, with P. falciparum entomological inoculation rates (EIR) marginally exceeding those for P. vivax [1,4,31–34]. In this region, the prevalence of P. falciparum rivals that of sub-Saharan Africa, while that of P. vivax is the highest in the world [1,4,34,35]. By comparing parasite population genetic structures, we aimed to gain an understanding of how local gene flow and genetic diversity differ between the two species in an area of similarly high prevalence. To investigate the genetic structure of sympatric P. falciparum and P. vivax populations, we determined multilocus microsatellite haplotypes in P. vivax isolates from four distinct geographic areas of PNG and compared the data to reanalysed, previously published data from the sympatric P. falciparum populations [35,36]. The results confirm the high diversity of these major malaria parasites in PNG and contrasting population genetic structures that highlight the potential consequences of the unique biology of P. vivax for malaria control programs.
Methods
Parasite isolates
Samples were collected from the Madang and East Sepik provinces on the north coast of PNG. In this region, all four major species of human malaria are endemic (P. falciparum, P. vivax, Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale), with year-round, intense transmission of malaria showing slight seasonal variations. In order to capture the diversity of parasites circulating in the community, venous blood samples were collected from 2359 asymptomatic volunteers of all ages in a cross sectional baseline survey at the start of an Intermittent Preventative Treatment of infants (IPTi) trial (Koepfli and Robinson et al. submitted). In the Wosera catchment area of the East Sepik Province, samples (n = 1077) were collected in the relatively dry period of August and September in 2005. The Wosera catchment comprises a cluster of eight villages spaced between 2–10km apart. In Madang Province samples were collected in the rainy season of March 2006 from twelve villages, clustered 5–20 km apart within three catchments areas surrounding Malala (n = 379), Mugil (n = 503) and Utu (n = 397) health centres, which are >50km apart (Table 1 and S1 Fig). These samples and the identification of parasite isolates have been described in detail elsewhere [35–37]. Only parasite isolates containing monoclonal infections were selected to ensure that multilocus haplotypes could be correctly reconstructed. Multiplicity of Infection (MOI) was previously determined using validated methods [37]. For the P. falciparum isolates, this included Pfmsp2 [36–38] and for P. vivax isolates, Pvmsp1F3 and PvMS16 genotyping [36,38–44].
Table 1. Prevalence and multiplicity of infection of P. falciparum and P. vivax populations on the north coast of Papua New Guinea.
Species | Province | Catchment | n | No. Infections (%) a | Infections with multiple clones (%) b | Mean MOI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P. falciparum | East Sepik | Wosera | 1077 | 240 (22.3) | 45 | 1.72 |
Madang | Malala | 379 | 129 (34.0) | 39 | 1.59 | |
" | Mugil | 503 | 195 (38.8) | 44 | 2.01 | |
" | Utu | 397 | 162 (40.8) | 45 | 1.97 | |
TOTAL | 2359 | 726 (30.8) | 44 | 1.83 | ||
P. vivax | East Sepik | Wosera | 1077 | 165 (15.3) | 58 | 1.97 |
Madang | Malala | 379 | 131 (34.6) | 48 | 1.80 | |
" | Mugil | 503 | 167 (33.2) | 48 | 1.76 | |
" | Utu | 397 | 109 (27.5) | 51 | 1.97 | |
TOTAL | 2359 | 574 (24.3) | 52 | 1.88 |
n = number of samples collected,
a. based on LDR-FMA;
b.based on Pfmsp2 or PvMS16/Pvmsp1f3; MOI = multiplicity of infection
Ethics statement
The samples were archived in a biobank at the PNG Institute of Medical Research. The original study in which samples were collected was explained in detail through both individual and community awareness meetings after which volunteers were invited to participate in the study. During enrolment, adult volunteers or the legal guardians of child volunteers were asked to provide oral informed consent to participate as this was the ethical requirement for this particular study, as approved by the local Institutional Review Board (details below). Whether oral consent was given to participate in the study and for samples to be used in further research, was documented in a database. Enrolment in the study was possible only if consent was given. All consenting members of selected populations were eligible for enrolment into the community surveys. People with concurrent or chronic illness that might impede their participation in the surveys were excluded. Ethical approval to conduct this study was granted by the PNG Institute of Medical Research Institutional Review Board (No. 11–05), the Medical Research Advisory Committee of PNG (No. 11–06) and the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute Human Research Ethics Committee (No. 11–12).
Microsatellite genotyping
For P. falciparum, we used previously published data for 320 monoclonal P. falciparum isolates genotyped at ten previously validated and commonly used, putatively neutral, microsatellite markers including TA1, TAA60, Polya, ARA2, Pfg377, TAA87, TAA42, PfPK2, TAA81 and 2490 [35,45].
For P. vivax, eleven putatively neutral microsatellites were genotyped including; MS1, MS2, MS5, MS6, MS7, MS9, MS10, MS12, MS15, MS20 and Pv3.27, chosen as a result of their frequent use in other studies [39–44,46], thereby allowing our data to be compared with P. vivax data from previous studies [46]. The microsatellite markers were amplified using an 11-plex primary PCR followed by individual nested PCRs as previously described [35,46] with a total of 35 cycles were used in both the primary and secondary rounds of PCR. All PCR products were sent to a commercial facility for fragment analysis on an ABI3730xl platform (Applied Biosystems) using the size standard LIZ500.
Data analysis
The P. vivax electropherograms were analysed with Genemapper V4.0 (Applied Biosystems) with the same peak calling strategy as that used for P. falciparum [35,47,48]. To avoid artefacts in the results that may occur with microsatellite markers [47–49] precautions were taken to ensure allele calling was as consistent as possible, including the reconstruction of dominant haplotypes (S1 Text). For both species the dominant and single haplotypes were compared within catchments to identify any significant differentiation by calculating both G ST and Jost’s D in the DEMEtics R package (see below, [35,49]). The two datasets were pooled only if genetic differentiation was very low.
Previous analyses of the P. falciparum dataset identified strong to moderate population structure [35,50] and were based on diploid genotypes coded as homozygote at each locus. However, blood stage parasites are haploid and therefore both species were analysed here using haploid datasets, thus maintaining the correct sample size.
To identify outlier samples and markers, and as an alternative method for investigating population structure, multidimensional scaling (MDS) was performed on the haplotype datasets. MDS, an alternative to principal component analysis (PCA) that allows for missing data, aims to project the distance matrix of the data to a lower dimension k, while trying to minimise the distances between data points. MDS was performed with the set of dissimilarity measures (Euclidean distance). Multiple pairwise scatterplots of the transformed data were examined to determine whether sample outliers could be identified and clustering observed. These analyses were performed in the statistical software R [50,51], using the cmdscale function. PCA was also performed using the princomp R command. The biplot function in R plots the projection of the original microsatellite marker variables in the new data space was used to identify the outlier markers.
To conduct the population genetic analyses, allele frequencies and input files for the various population genetics programs were created using CONVERT version 1.31 [51,52]. Genetic diversity was measured by calculating the number of alleles (A) and expected heterozygosity (H e) using ARLEQUIN version 3.5.1.2 [52,53] and allelic richness (R s) using FSTAT version 2.9.3.2 [49,53]. Pairwise genetic differentiation was measured by calculating Jost’s D and the F ST-derivative, G ST with bias correction using the DEMEtics package [49,54–56]. It should be noted that G ST and its relatives have been shown to underestimate genetic differentiation when applied to diverse microsatellite markers [54–56]. Jost’s D however, is a more appropriate measure of genetic differentiation for diverse microsatellites, as it first normalises heterozygosity, thus allowing comparisons between species with different sets of microsatellite markers. Furthermore, Jost’s D is considered a superior diversity measure over G ST and F ST since it shows correct behaviour for highly polymorphic loci where G ST and F ST underestimate diversity [49,54,55,57]. We have therefore used Jost’s D as the primary measure of differentiation, however we have included G ST to allow for comparison with previous studies. All markers (except TAA42 and Pv3.27, see results below) were used in these analyses regardless of their mode of mutation (simple step-wise or complex mutation). Jost’s D was calculated as follows:
The bias-corrected D est values were based on equation twelve of Jost 2008 [54]:
and G ST:
Bias-corrected G ST_est values were calculated according to Nei & Chesser [58]:
A Mantel test was performed between Jost’s D and G ST and geographical distance between catchments, using the mantel.rtest function from the ade4 library in R, with 10,000 replicates [59]. Correlations between; prevalence, mean MOI and percentage of multiple infections with; D and G ST were tested by measuring Spearman’s correlation coefficient (ρ).
To calculate effective population size (N e), the same method previously described for P. falciparum was used for both species [11]. Data for the mutation rate of P. vivax microsatellites are lacking, and therefore the microsatellite mutation rate (μ) for P. falciparum of 1.59×10–4 (95% confidence interval: 6.98×10−5, 3.7×10−4), was used for both species [46]. Not all markers adhere to a strict stepwise mutation model (SMM), therefore N e was calculated using both the SMM and infinite allele models (IAM) [11]. For SMM, N e was calculated as follows:
where H E_mean is the expected heterozygosity across all loci. For the IAM, N e was calculated using the formula:
As a measure of inbreeding in each population, multilocus linkage disequilibrium (LD) was calculated using LIAN version 3.6, applying a Monte Carlo test with 100,000 re-sampling steps [60]. The markers Pv3.27 (Pv) and TAA42 (Pf) and the sample outliers identified using the PCA biplot analysis were not included in LD analysis. To estimate associations among loci using this program, the Index of Association (I S A) was calculated for all complete haplotypes and also those from single infections only. I S A was also calculated in single infections alone as a precaution against the potential for incorrectly reconstructed dominant haplotypes to artificially inflate outbreeding.
To further investigate parasite population genetic structure, the Bayesian clustering software, STRUCTURE version 2.3.4 was used to investigate whether haplotypes clustered according to geographical origin. Unlike the genetic differentiation parameters described above which are based on predefined populations, this program attempts to form groups of haplotypes based on the allele frequencies at each locus with no prior geographical information, assigning individuals to one or more populations (K) [61]. The analysis was run 20 times for K = 1 to 8 for 100,000 Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) iterations after a burn-in period of 10,000 using the admixture model and correlated allele frequencies. The log probability of the data LnP[D] used for determining optimal K has been shown to be suboptimal in some situations and therefore the second order rate of change of LnP[D], ΔK was also calculated according to the method of Evanno et al. [62].
Due to the small number of data points (four catchments), statistical analysis of the resulting molecular epidemiological and population genetic parameters was done using non-parametric methods as indicated using R or Prism software (GraphPad Prism, version 6.0d, GraphPad software, San Diego) [50].
Results
Prevalence and MOI
As previously reported, amongst the 2359 blood samples collected, a total of 765 (30.8%) P. falciparum and 574 (24.3%) P. vivax infections were detected by molecular diagnostic methods [35–37]. The prevalence of both species was lowest in the Wosera and P. falciparum was the dominant species in all but one catchment (Malala), where prevalence was comparable (Table 1). The difference in species prevalence in the different catchments was not significant (two sample Mann-Whitney U test: p = 0.34). Based on genotyping using Pfmsp2 and the combination of Pvmsp1F3 and PvMS16, the mean MOI was only slightly greater for P. vivax (1.88) than that for P. falciparum (1.83, [37]) however P. vivax had a significantly larger proportion of multiple infections (52%) than did P. falciparum (44%) (Chi-squared test, 1 df: p = 0.0045).
Identification of haplotypes and data cleaning
For P. falciparum, multilocus haplotypes with at least four of the ten microsatellites were available for 320 isolates including 214 confirmed single infections (single) and 106 “dominant” infections comprising dominant allele calls (major peaks) from two or more markers (dominant) [35] (S1 Dataset). Reanalysis of the cleaned dataset for the two groups of haplotypes again showed no genetic differentiation (S1 Table), and therefore the single infection and dominant infection datasets were combined for further analyses.
For the new P. vivax microsatellite data produced in this study, haplotypes for five or more microsatellites were successfully reconstructed for 204 P. vivax isolates [36]. Of these, 82 were single and 122 were dominant (S1 Dataset). Comparisons revealed negligible genetic differentiation, with all G ST and D values being insignificant (S1 Table), therefore they were also combined for further analyses.
Before investigating population structure, the datasets were first screened using MDS and PCA to identify outlier markers or samples that might obscure signals of local population structure. For P. falciparum, this analysis identified 12 outlier samples that when removed, revealed separation between Madang and East Sepik samples and tight clustering of Utu samples within the Madang cluster (S2A Fig and S2B Fig). As indicated in the biplot for the PCA, the vertically aligned clustering pattern was driven by marker TAA42 (S2C Fig). This marker features a 57 bp indel and displayed a bimodal allele frequency distribution [35], which could either be due to the indel itself or due to genotyping artefacts. TAA42 was therefore removed from the P. falciparum dataset (S1 Dataset). For P. vivax, the analysis identified 11 outlier samples (S3A Fig). Furthermore, Pv3.27 introduced a clustering pattern independent of geographical origin (S3B Fig and S3C Fig). This marker was previously found to display excess diversity [63], which also occurs in these PNG populations. Pv3.27, as well as the 11 outlier samples, were consequently removed from all further analysis of P. vivax (S3 Table). Population structure is analysed in more detail below using the cleaned datasets.
Genetic diversity
Levels of genetic diversity were high for both species in all four sympatric populations and all haplotypes were unique (Table 2). Genetic diversity was consistently higher for P. vivax for all parameters (Table 2). For P. vivax, estimates of genetic diversity within catchments were similar to that of all catchments combined, consistent with little or no population structure (Table 2). In contrast, the overall genetic diversity for P. falciparum was higher than that for the catchments (Table 2) consistent with a hierarchical level of population structure. For both species, Utu was the least diverse population, and all of the other catchments had similar levels of diversity (Table 2). No correlation was found between prevalence, mean MOI or percent of multiple infections with the levels of genetic diversity (S2 Table) indicating that diversity was not reduced as a result of lower transmission in the Wosera catchment, an observation we have previously made using other highly polymorphic markers [36,37].
Table 2. Estimates of genetic diversity of P. falciparum and P. vivax populations on the north coast of Papua New Guinea.
Species | Province | Catchment | n | H e ±SE | A ±SE | R s ±SE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P. falciparum | East Sepik | Wosera | 110 | 0.74 ± 0.05 | 10.44 ± 0.96 | 9.33 ± 0.79 |
Madang | Malala | 62 | 0.77 ± 0.02 | 8.89 ± 0.81 | 8.64 ± 0.78 | |
" | Mugil | 72 | 0.77 ± 0.03 | 9.33 ± 0.67 | 9.04 ± 0.69 | |
" | Utu | 64 | 0.68 ± 0.06 | 7.78 ± 0.91 | 7.49 ± 0.87 | |
TOTAL | 308 | 0.80 ± 0.03 | 13.44 ± 1.26 | 10.27 ± 0.79 | ||
P. vivax | East Sepik | Wosera | 61 | 0.82 ± 0.03 | 11.20 ± 1.30 | 10.59 ± 1.19 |
Madang | Malala | 41 | 0.83 ± 0.02 | 11.00 ± 1.28 | 10.89 ± 1.29 | |
" | Mugil | 54 | 0.84 ± 0.02 | 11.40 ± 1.00 | 10.99 ± 0.96 | |
" | Utu | 37 | 0.83 ± 0.02 | 9.20 ± 0.95 | 9.19 ± 0.95 | |
TOTAL | 193 | 0.84 ± 0.02 | 15.30 ± 1.87 | 11.99 ± 1.28 |
n = number of isolates genotyped after exclusion of outliers; H e = expected heterozygosity; A = Mean number of alleles, R s = Allelic richness.
Effective population size
Using both the SMM and IAM models of evolution (see Materials and Methods), effective population size was estimated and found to be substantially greater for P. vivax than those for P. falciparum (Table 3). It must however be noted that in the absence of a microsatellite mutation rate for P. vivax (the same mutation rate was used for both species), and in light of the very large confidence intervals as a result of the variable estimates of the mutation rate, these results should be interpreted with care.
Table 3. Effective population size estimates for P. falciparum and P. vivax populations on the north coast of Papua New Guinea.
SMM | IAM | ||
---|---|---|---|
P. falciparum | Wosera | 10508 (4515–23936) | 4387 (1885–9994) |
Malala | 14696 (6315–33476) | 5405 (2323–12313) | |
Mugil | 14017 (6023–31929) | 5250 (2256–11960) | |
Utu | 6853 (2945–15612) | 3329 (1431–7583) | |
Total | 18871 (8109–42986) | 6290 (2703–14328) | |
P. vivax | Wosera | 24108 (10360–54917) | 7276 (3127–16573) |
Malala | 25344 (10891–57732) | 7492 (3220–17067) | |
Mugil | 31778 (13656–72388) | 8547 (3673–19470) | |
Utu | 25883 (11123–58960) | 7586 (3260–17279) | |
Total | 30353 (13043–69142) | 8323 (3577–18960) |
SMM = Stepwise mutation model, IAM = Infinite Alleles Model. The mutation rate of 1.59 X 10−4 for P. falciparum was used for both species. Numbers in brackets are lower and upper estimates derived from using the 95% confidence upper and lower mutation rates for P. falciparum (Lower = 6.98 X 10−5, Upper = 3.7 X 10−4) [11].
Multilocus linkage disequilibrium
No evidence of multilocus LD was found in any of the P. falciparum catchments for all infections or single infections alone. Extremely low, yet significant LD was found when all catchments were combined (Table 4) however this was likely a result of subpopulation structure, a phenomenon known as the Wahlund effect [64]. For P. vivax, no significant LD was found with the exception of Wosera (Table 4) where two pairs of closely related haplotypes were found in one village (Nindigo). Linkage equilibrium was restored after removal of one of the shared nine loci haplotypes (I S A = 0.0052, p = 0.279). These closely-related isolates suggest instances of near clonal transmission or the presence of meiotic siblings among isolates from Nindigo [65].
Table 4. Estimates of multilocus linkage disequilibrium for P. falciparum and P. vivax populations on the north coast of Papua New Guinea.
All Infections | Single Infections | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n a | I S A (p-value) | n a | I S A (p-value) | ||
P. falciparum | Wosera | 38 | -0.0049 (0.67) | 32 | -0.0076 (0.72) |
Malala | 34 | 0.0015 (0.39) | 22 | 0.0074 (0.71) | |
Mugil | 35 | 0.0013 (0.43) | 21 | 0.0044 (0.38) | |
Utu | 52 | 0.0013 (0.42) | 36 | 0.0033 (0.35) | |
TOTAL | 159 | 0.0088 (0.01) | 111 | 0.0046 (0.15) | |
P. vivax | Wosera | 53 | 0.0071 (0.05) | 26 | 0.0146 (0.04) |
Malala | 39 | 0.0079 (0.09) | 18 | 0.0049 (0.32) | |
Mugil | 37 | 0.0066 (0.12) | 10 | -0.0235 (0.89) | |
Utu | 27 | 0.0093 (0.11) | 9 | -0.0018 (0.58) | |
TOTAL | 156 | 0.0023 (0.08) | 63 | 0.0053 (0.07) |
I S A = Index of Association,
a = all infections,
b = single infections only
Population structure
After exclusion of outlier samples and markers (see above), the MDS demonstrated clear divergence of P. falciparum populations in Madang province from the Wosera group of data points, indicating population structure at least between provinces (Fig 1A). In addition, Utu isolates were more closely clustered within the Madang cluster. For P. vivax, no such structure was visible in the MDS analysis, with isolates distributed throughout the main cluster independent of geographic origin (Fig 1B).
To measure levels of interpopulation differentiation between the different catchments, pairwise G ST values were then determined. G ST values were ten-fold higher between populations of P. falciparum (range of (0.0171, 0.0264)) than for those of P. vivax (range of (-0.0011, 0.0028), Table 5). In addition, the more robust measure Jost’s D, also showed higher levels of differentiation between P. falciparum populations (0.2105, 0.2811) than for P. vivax ((-0.0311, 0.0555),Table 5). D values can be interpreted as the mean proportion of pairwise private alleles between populations therefore for P. falciparum, 20–28% of alleles in each population are private, while for P. vivax less than 5% of alleles are private (S3 Table). The Mantel test for correlation between geographical and genetic distance found no significant correlation (S4 Table) indicating that the genetic differentiation observed was consistent with population fragmentation and genetic drift rather than isolation by distance.
Table 5. Estimates of genetic differentiation among P. falciparum and P. vivax populations on the North Coast of Papua New Guinea.
P. falciparum | Wosera | Malala | Mugil | Utu | |
Wosera | - | 0.0199 | 0.0255 | 0.0171 | |
Malala | 0.2550 | - | 0.0192 | 0.0208 | |
Mugil | 0.2811 | 0.2144 | - | 0.0264 | |
Utu | 0.2105 | 0.2485 | 0.2560 | - | |
P. vivax | Wosera | Malala | Mugil | Utu | |
Wosera | - | 0.0028 | 0.0015 | 0.0017 | |
Malala | 0.0555 | - | 0.0023 | 0.0016 | |
Mugil | 0.0264 | 0.0488 | - | -0.0011 | |
Utu | 0.0300 | 0.0415 | -0.0311 | - |
Jost’s D values lower left, G ST values upper right
In order to confirm the geospatial population structure observed, Bayesian cluster analysis of the haploid datasets was run before and after the exclusion of outliers and markers (TAA42 and Pv3.27) for both species using STRUCTURE version 2.3.4 [61]. Preliminary runs with 10,000 MCMC showed additional clustering by catchment in the P. falciparum dataset after MDS data cleaning (S4 Fig), however the use of a longer chain length of 100,000 MCMC also resolved four genetically distinct populations that were associated with each of the four catchments, with ΔK peaking at K = 3 (Fig 2A). Although there was evidence of some admixture among populations, this indicated three or four genetically distinct populations concordant with the catchment areas and the moderate values of genetic differentiation described above. For P. vivax there was no clear peak in the ΔK values. As the method of Evanno et al. is not reliable at identifying optimal K if K = 1 [62] we inspected the distribution of membership coefficients at K = 4. This partitioned all genotypes equally into four genetic clusters (Fig 2B), clearly demonstrating a complete lack of population structure. In addition we compared the new P. vivax data to that previously produced by Koepfli et al. [46] for nearby villages in East Sepik and Madang Provinces, as well as data from a village located in a remote inter-montane valley in the highlands (Sigimaru) and the Solomon Islands (S5 Fig). The results confirm a complete lack of detectable population structure for P. vivax in the SW Pacific region, based on the microsatellite markers [46].
Discussion
Higher diversity among global P. vivax isolates than among P. falciparum isolates has been proposed to be consistent with more stable transmission over a long period of time and/or deeper evolutionary roots [66]. In some co-endemic areas, such as South America, the higher microsatellite diversity of P. vivax can be explained by its more stable transmission than P. falciparum [19,67]. A higher mutation rate of P. vivax microsatellites has also been proposed as one possible mechanism for the higher diversity of this species in South East Asia [17]. Within PNG, we have shown that despite comparably high transmission, as measured by EIR [31–33] and slightly lower infection prevalence than P. falciparum [36,37], P. vivax has greater genetic diversity and larger effective population sizes. Furthermore, we show for the first time that populations of P. vivax are highly admixed compared to sympatric populations of P. falciparum, which appear to be fragmented according to the analyses of genetic differentiation and population structure. In addition to the previous explanations for the higher diversity of P. vivax, we propose that the contrasting patterns of population structure at least partially reflect differences in the biology of these species. In particular, the ability of P. vivax to develop dormant hypnozoites and cause consecutive relapses is likely to provide more opportunities for the exchange and dissemination of alleles.
Higher genetic diversity suggests that P. vivax has greater evolutionary potential, which may allow it to adapt more rapidly to various environmental challenges including new antimalarial interventions. Indeed, our previous work has shown that P. vivax has much greater diversity in genes encoding the orthologs encoding the vaccine candidate AMA1, suggesting that it will be more difficult to vaccinate against all strains [68]. Because of its panmictic population structure in PNG, P. vivax may also be able to disseminate advantageous traits, such as drug resistance, more effectively than P. falciparum.
The generation of diversity in malaria parasite populations is facilitated by multiple clone infections [11], that permit the concurrent transmission of distinct clones which recombine in the mosquito midgut, generating novel genotypes [69]. Mean MOI values were similar between species, however the proportion of multiple infections differed considerably between species and between populations, possibly reflecting differences in transmission, which may be the result of relapsing P. vivax hypnozoites [70]. It should also be noted that the detection of clones would have been limited to a greater extent for P. vivax since it has lower density infections, in which case MOI for P. vivax may be underestimated. Whatever the case, the higher proportion of multiple infections in P. vivax provides a possible mechanism for generating and maintaining high levels of genetic diversity. That neither species showed any significant multilocus LD confirms high levels of outcrossing and overall high levels of transmission for both species, which contrasts with areas of low transmission where significant LD and clonal population structures have been observed in both species [17,19]. Differences in the proportion of multiple infections, if maintained over long periods of time, may be enough to drive the higher diversity of P. vivax compared to P. falciparum in PNG.
The contrasting patterns of population structure in PNG are consistent with P. vivax maintaining a large and relatively constant population size for a long period of time. For P. falciparum, the data suggest that allelic exchange between geographic regions may be or has been restricted or subject to population bottlenecks in the past. P. vivax was historically the dominant species in PNG [10,71] and the greater diversity observed could have resulted from an earlier colonisation of PNG by this species, and/or more frequent outcrossing as a result of a consistently higher proportion of multiple infections. While microsatellites can yield important information into population structure on an epidemiologically relevant time scale (tens to hundreds of years), studies using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) have provided great insight into the global spread and local population history of these two parasites. P. vivax has extraordinary mtDNA diversity in PNG with distinct haplotypes compared to other regions of the world. The most recent common ancestor has a wide age range (41–251 kya) and demographic modelling indicates a steady increase in population size over past millennia [72]. On the other hand, the P. falciparum population of PNG is dominated by one mtDNA haplotype also found in all other global P. falciparum populations, in addition to a number of rarer, private haplotypes, consistent with a relatively recent introduction and rapid population expansion within the last 30–50 kya [73,74]. It is therefore plausible that an earlier colonisation by P. vivax may have contributed to the higher baseline microsatellite diversity. It is also highly likely that recent events have shaped the population structure of P. falciparum and P. vivax in PNG, in a time frame detectable by microsatellite markers. The Indoor Residual Spraying programme, initiated in 1957 as part of the last Global Malaria Eradication Program, led to a substantial decline in the prevalence of all malaria species in PNG and particularly P. falciparum. After this control programme was abandoned in the late 1970s, malaria resurged with P. falciparum emerging as the dominant species [10,71], facilitated by the emergence of chloroquine resistance (CQR) [75]. The greater impact of control efforts and possibly CQR on P. falciparum is likely to have caused population bottlenecks, with consequent reductions in effective population size and limited gene flow leading to substantial genetic differentiation between populations. P. vivax cases also declined during this time, but as we have mentioned above, this parasite has high levels of population diversity even at low transmission [13,14,17,19,42,43], indicating that it may be less susceptible than P. falciparum to population bottlenecks resulting from declining transmission. In other geographic areas where interventions have succeeded in reducing the transmission of both species to very low levels, continuing malaria control efforts have had a less dramatic impact on P. vivax, suggesting that this parasite is more resistant to interventions [1,5,76]. This is likely to be a consequence of its unique biological characteristics, especially relapse, which provides more opportunities for outcrossing and dissemination of clones and may thus have allowed P. vivax to maintain large effective population sizes and gene flow even at low transmission.
In tropical areas such as PNG, relapsing hypnozoites contribute to at least 50% and up to 80% of all blood stage infections [70], with activation of hypnozoites allowing multiclonal infections even during times of low transmission intensity, in turn increasing the chances of outbreeding and reducing the likelihood of bottlenecks [77]. Dormancy may also aid the break down of population structure over large distances, as parasites hitchhike during human migration over greater distances than mosquitoes can travel. Human movement has been shown to be important for gene flow between island populations, however where human populations are continuous, gene flow likely occurs from a combination of both human and vector movement [78]. Hypnozoites not only facilitate the movement of parasite genotypes over large geographic distances, but constant reinfection and relapses of parasites from distinct inocula would allow for the recombination of distinct parasite clones and generations, promoting and maintaining high genetic diversity. In addition, P. vivax gametocytes appear in the blood stream earlier during an infection than P. falciparum gametocytes, and may be infective to mosquitoes before patients become symptomatic and seek treatment, thereby increasing the overall gene pool [6]. In the context of intensive malaria control, decreases in P. vivax diversity and subdivision of populations are thus less likely than for P. falciparum, and would only result from long-term, sustained interruption of transmission. This also provides an explanation for how P. vivax maintains high diversity even at low transmission and the absence of population structure observed here and in previous studies [46].
It is important to point out that the inclusion of outlier samples and markers in the population genetic analyses had a clear impact on the resolution of population structure. Clustering methods such as PCA and MDS are affected by outlier samples and markers, thus failure to remove these may hide true clustering patterns. These may be aberrant genotypes or infections imported from other endemic areas of PNG or beyond, however without samples from potential source populations this is not possible to confirm. After the removal of outliers, geographic population structure could be detected in P. falciparum samples based on one MDS coordinate. The bimodal clustering pattern observed along the other axis was driven by TAA42, which may be due to selection or technical artefacts. Running STRUCTURE for at least 100,000 MCMC steps also resolved the populations in the presence of TAA42, indicating that STRUCTURE was somewhat robust to outliers. However the analysis required more MCMC steps than are usually employed, indicating that the outliers produced a more complex likelihood, making it more difficult for the method to identify the maximum likelihood. As far as we are aware, data cleaning such as this is not routinely performed in microsatellite studies. Given the high probability of technical artefacts, and that population specific selection that may influence the allele frequencies of certain markers [63], we advocate the MDS and PCA data cleaning approaches for other studies of microsatellite-based population structure.
In conclusion, in an area of PNG where EIR and prevalence were comparably high at the time of sampling, P. vivax populations were consistently more genetically diverse, had larger effective population sizes and were more highly admixed compared to sympatric P. falciparum populations, which consisted of fragmented subpopulations. We propose this is driven by higher effective transmission of P. vivax, at least in part due to the re-activation of parasites from a pool of genetically diverse hypnozoites. The results underline the biological and historical differences between these two malaria species and illustrate why P. vivax is a greater challenge to elimination efforts. Distinct evolutionary histories [72–74,79], historically higher prevalence of P. vivax in PNG [80] and maintenance of high diversity at low transmission during the last eradication program are also likely to be contributing factors [10,37,46]. This warrants investigations to further elucidate the comparative demographic histories of P. falciparum and P. vivax in endemic areas, to understand the impact of past control efforts on the different species and to predict future outcomes of current control efforts. Since the samples were collected prior to intensified malaria control, these results will form the baseline against which future changes will be compared [81]. Significant reductions in the prevalence of both species in recent years, as the result of a nationwide control programme [1,82], may have had an impact upon these population structures. As intensive control has been maintained, reductions in diversity and increases in population structure could ultimately result, signalling the interruption of transmission [27]. The results also show that it will be important to measure changes in parasite population structure to inform control and elimination programs in areas where P. vivax is present, since traditional epidemiological parameters will underestimate true transmission rates.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the study participants, their parents and guardians without whom the study would not have been possible. We are also grateful to all staff at the participating health centres and at the PNG Institute of Medical Research involved in the sample collection including N. Senn, B. Kiniboro and J. Nale. We thank L. Schultz, J. Wapling and P. Ntsuke for generating microsatellite data for P. falciparum and C. Barnadas for helpful discussions.
Data Availability
The genotype data is available in the Supporting Information Files.
Funding Statement
The research is supported by a Project Grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (Nos. 488122 and 1003825). IM is supported by NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship. MB is supported by an NHMRC Program grant and an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship. The work was made possible through Victorian State Government Operational Infrastructure Support and Australian Government NHMRC IRIISS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.WHO (2013) World Malaria Report 2012: 1–288.
- 2. Genton B, D'Acremont V, Rare L, Baea K, Reeder JC, et al. (2008) Plasmodium vivax and mixed infections are associated with severe malaria in children: a prospective cohort study from Papua New Guinea. PLoS Med 5: e127 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Naing C, Whittaker MA, Wai VN, Mak JW (2014) Is Plasmodium vivax Malaria a Severe Malaria?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8:—e3071 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Gething PW, Elyazar IRF, Moyes CL, Smith DL, Battle KE, et al. (2012) A Long Neglected World Malaria Map: Plasmodium vivax Endemicity in 2010. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1814 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Oliveira-Ferreira J, Lacerda MVG, Brasil P, Ladislau JLB, Tauil PL, et al. (2010) Malaria in Brazil: an overview. Malar J 9: 115 10.1186/1475-2875-9-115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bousema T, Drakeley C (2011) Epidemiology and infectivity of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax gametocytes in relation to malaria control and elimination. Clin Microbiol Rev 24: 377–410. 10.1128/CMR.00051-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. White NJ, Imwong M (2012) Relapse. Adv Parasitol 80: 113–150. 10.1016/B978-0-12-397900-1.00002-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Mueller I, Galinski MR, Tsuboi T, Arévalo-Herrera M, Collins WE, et al. (2013) Natural Acquisition of Immunity to Plasmodium vivax: Epidemiological Observations and Potential Targets. Adv Parasitol 81: 77–131. 10.1016/B978-0-12-407826-0.00003-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Feachem RGA, Phillips AA, Hwang J, Cotter C, Wielgosz B, et al. (2010) Shrinking the malaria map: progress and prospects. Lancet 376: 1566–1578. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61270-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Müller I, Bockarie M, Alpers M, Smith T (2003) The epidemiology of malaria in Papua New Guinea. Trends Parasitol 19: 253–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Anderson TJ, Haubold B, Williams JT, Estrada-Franco JG, Richardson L, et al. (2000) Microsatellite markers reveal a spectrum of population structures in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biol Evol 17: 1467–1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gray K-A, Dowd S, Bain L, Bobogare A, Wini L, et al. (2013) Population genetics of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax and asymptomatic malaria in Temotu Province, Solomon Islands. Malar J 12: 429 10.1186/1475-2875-12-429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gunawardena S, Ferreira MU, Kapilananda GMG, Wirth DF, Karunaweera ND (2014) The Sri Lankan paradox: high genetic diversity in Plasmodium vivax populations despite decreasing levels of malaria transmission. Parasitology: 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 14. Karunaweera ND, Ferreira MU, Munasinghe A, Barnwell JW, Collins WE, et al. (2008) Extensive microsatellite diversity in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax. Gene 410: 105–112. 10.1016/j.gene.2007.11.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ord RL, Tami A, Sutherland CJ (2008) ama1 genes of sympatric Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum from Venezuela differ significantly in genetic diversity and recombination frequency. PLoS ONE 3: e3366 10.1371/journal.pone.0003366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Orjuela-Sánchez P, Da Silva-Nunes M, Da Silva NS, Scopel KKG, Gonçalves RM, et al. (2009) Population dynamics of genetically diverse Plasmodium falciparum lineages: community-based prospective study in rural Amazonia. Parasitology 136: 1097–1105. 10.1017/S0031182009990539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Orjuela-Sánchez P, Sá JM, Brandi MCC, Rodrigues PT, Bastos MS, et al. (2013) Higher microsatellite diversity in Plasmodium vivax than in sympatric Plasmodium falciparum populations in Pursat, Western Cambodia. Exp Parasitol 134: 318–326. 10.1016/j.exppara.2013.03.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Batista CL, Barbosa S, Bastos MDS, Viana SAS, Ferreira MU (2015) Genetic diversity of Plasmodium vivax over time and space: a community-based study in rural Amazonia. Parasitology 142: 374–384. 10.1017/S0031182014001176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Chenet SM, Schneider KA, Villegas L, Escalante AA (2012) Local population structure of Plasmodium: impact on malaria control and elimination. Malar J 11: 412 10.1186/1475-2875-11-412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conservation Biology 17: 230–237. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ekland EH, Fidock DA (2007) Advances in understanding the genetic basis of antimalarial drug resistance. Curr Opin Microbiol 10: 363–370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Barry AE, Arnott A (2014) Strategies for Designing and Monitoring Malaria Vaccines Targeting Diverse Antigens. Frontiers in Immunology 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Takala SL, Plowe CV (2009) Genetic diversity and malaria vaccine design, testing and efficacy: preventing and overcoming “vaccine resistant malaria.” Parasite Immunol 31: 560–573. 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2009.01138.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Obaldia N, Baro NK, Calzada JE, Santamaria AM, Daniels R, et al. (2014) Clonal Outbreak of Plasmodium falciparum Infection in Eastern Panama. J INFECT DIS. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25. Ghansah A, Amenga-Etego L, Amambua-Ngwa A, Ben Andagalu, Apinjoh T, et al. (2014) Monitoring parasite diversity for malaria elimination in sub-Saharan Africa. Science 345: 1297–1298. 10.1126/science.1259423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Spanakos G, Alifrangis M, Schousboe ML, Patsoula E, Tegos N, et al. (2013) Genotyping Plasmodium vivax isolates from the 2011 outbreak in Greece. Malar J 12: 463 10.1186/1475-2875-12-463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Anthony TG, Conway DJ, Cox-Singh J, Matusop A, Ratnam S, et al. (2005) Fragmented population structure of plasmodium falciparum in a region of declining endemicity Vol. 191. pp. 1558–1564. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 28. Arnott A, Barry AE, Reeder JC (2012) Understanding the population genetics of Plasmodium vivax is essential for malaria control and elimination. Malar J 11: 14 10.1186/1475-2875-11-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Brito CFA de, Ferreira MU (2011) Molecular markers and genetic diversity of Plasmodium vivax. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 106 Suppl 1: 12–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Bousema T, Griffin JT, Sauerwein RW, Smith DL, Churcher TS, et al. (2012) Hitting hotspots: spatial targeting of malaria for control and elimination. PLoS Med 9: e1001165 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Burkot TR, Graves PM, Paru R, Wirtz RA, Heywood PF (1988) Human Malaria Transmission Studies in the Anopheles-Punctulatus Complex in Papua-New-Guinea—Sporozoite Rates, Inoculation Rates, and Sporozoite Densities. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 39: 135–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hii J, Smith T, Mai A, Ibam E, Alpers MP (2000) Comparison between anopheline mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) caught using different methods in a malaria endemic area of Papua New Guinea. Bull Entomol Res 90: 211–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Michon P, Cole-Tobian JL, Dabod E, Schoepflin S, Igu J, et al. (2007) The risk of malarial infections and disease in Papua New Guinean children. Am J Trop Med Hyg 76: 997–1008. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Gething PW, Patil AP, Smith DL, Guerra CA, Elyazar IRF, et al. (2011) A new world malaria map: Plasmodium falciparum endemicity in 2010. Malar J 10: 378 10.1186/1475-2875-10-378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Schultz L, Wapling J, Mueller I, Ntsuke PO, Senn N, et al. (2010) Multilocus haplotypes reveal variable levels of diversity and population structure of Plasmodium falciparum in Papua New Guinea, a region of intense perennial transmission. Malar J 9: 336 10.1186/1475-2875-9-336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Arnott A, Barnadas C, Senn N, Siba P, Mueller I, et al. (2013) High genetic diversity of Plasmodium vivax on the north coast of Papua New Guinea. Am J Trop Med Hyg 89: 188–194. 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0774 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Barry AE, Schultz L, Senn N, Nale J, Kiniboro B, et al. (2013) High levels of genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum populations in Papua New Guinea despite variable infection prevalence. Am J Trop Med Hyg 88: 718–725. 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Koepfli C, Ross A, Kiniboro B, Smith TA, Zimmerman PA, et al. (2011) Multiplicity and diversity of Plasmodium vivax infections in a highly endemic region in Papua New Guinea. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e1424 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Karunaweera ND, Ferreira MU, Hartl DL, Wirth DF (2006) Fourteen polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers for the human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax. Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 172–175. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Van Den Eede P, Van Der Auwera G, Delgado C, Huyse T, Soto-Calle VE, et al. (2010) Multilocus genotyping reveals high heterogeneity and strong local population structure of the Plasmodium vivax population in the Peruvian Amazon. Malar J 9: 151 10.1186/1475-2875-9-151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Imwong M, Boel ME, Pagornrat W, Pimanpanarak M, Mcgready R, et al. (2012) The First Plasmodium vivax Relapses of Life Are Usually Genetically Homologous. Journal of Infectious Diseases 205: 680–683. 10.1093/infdis/jir806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Imwong M, Nair S, Pukrittayakamee S, Sudimack D, Williams JT, et al. (2007) Contrasting genetic structure in Plasmodium vivax populations from Asia and South America. Int J Parasitol 37: 1013–1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Gunawardena S, Karunaweera ND, Ferreira MU, Phone-Kyaw M, Pollack RJ, et al. (2010) Geographic structure of Plasmodium vivax: microsatellite analysis of parasite populations from Sri Lanka, Myanmar, and Ethiopia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 82: 235–242. 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Iwagami M, Fukumoto M, Hwang S-Y, Kim S-H, Kho W-G, et al. (2012) Population Structure and Transmission Dynamics of Plasmodium vivax in the Republic of Korea Based on Microsatellite DNA Analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 6: e1592 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001592 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Anderson TJ, Su XZ, Bockarie M, Lagog M, Day KP (1999) Twelve microsatellite markers for characterization of Plasmodium falciparum from finger-prick blood samples. Parasitology 119 (Pt 2): 113–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Koepfli C, Timinao L, Antao T, Barry AE, Siba P, et al. (2013) A Large Plasmodium vivax Reservoir and Little Population Structure in the South Pacific. PLoS ONE 8: e66041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Havryliuk T, Ferreira MU (2009) A closer look at multiple-clone Plasmodium vivax infections: detection methods, prevalence and consequences. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 104: 67–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. de Valk HA, Meis JFGM, Bretagne S, Costa J-M, Lasker BA, et al. (2009) Interlaboratory reproducibility of a microsatellite-based typing assay for Aspergillus fumigatus through the use of allelic ladders: proof of concept. Clin Microbiol Infect 15: 180–187. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02656.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Gerlach G, Jueterbock A, Kraemer P, Deppermann J, Harmand P (2010) Calculations of population differentiation based on GST and D: forget GST but not all of statistics! Mol Ecol 19: 3845–3852. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04784.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Team RDC, editor (n.d.) R: A language and environment for Statistical Computing Vienna Austria: the R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Available: http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 25 February 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Glaubitz JC (2004) CONVERT: A user-friendly program to reformat diploid genotypic data for commonly used population genetic software packages. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 309–310. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1: 47–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity 86: 485–486. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Jost L (2008) G(ST) and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17: 4015–4026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Balloux F, Brünner H, Lugon-Moulin N, Hausser J, Goudet J (2000) Microsatellites can be misleading: an empirical and simulation study. Evolution 54: 1414–1422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Balloux F, Lugon-Moulin N (2002) The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol 11: 155–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Heller R, Siegismund HR (2009) Relationship between three measures of genetic differentiation G(ST), D(EST) and G'(ST): how wrong have we been? Mol Ecol 18: 2080–2083; discussion2088–discussion2091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Nei M, Chesser RK (1983) Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities. Ann Hum Genet 47: 253–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27: 209–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Haubold B, Hudson RR (2000) LIAN 3.0: detecting linkage disequilibrium in multilocus data. Linkage Analysis. Bioinformatics 16: 847–848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611–2620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Sutton PL (2013) A call to arms: on refining Plasmodium vivax microsatellite marker panels for comparing global diversity. Malar J 12: 447 10.1186/1475-2875-12-447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wahlund S (1928) Zusammensetzung von Populationen und Korrelationserscheinungen vom Standpunkt der Vererbungslehre aus betrachtet. Hereditas. 42 pp.
- 65. Bright AT, Manary MJ, Tewhey R, Arango EM, Wang T, et al. (2014) A High Resolution Case Study of a Patient with Recurrent Plasmodium vivax Infections Shows That Relapses Were Caused by Meiotic Siblings. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8: e2882–e2882. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Neafsey DE, Galinsky K, Jiang RHY, Young L, Sykes SM, et al. (2012) The malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax exhibits greater genetic diversity than Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Genet 44: 1046–1050. 10.1038/ng.2373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Ferreira MU, Karunaweera ND, da Silva-Nunes M, da Silva NS, Wirth DF, et al. (2007) Population structure and transmission dynamics of Plasmodium vivax in rural Amazonia. J INFECT DIS 195: 1218–1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Arnott A, Wapling J, Mueller I, Ramsland PA, Siba PM, et al. (2014) Distinct patterns of diversity, population structure and evolution in the AMA1 genes of sympatric Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax populations of Papua New Guinea from an area of similarly high transmission. Malar J 13: 233 10.1186/1475-2875-13-233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Paul RE, Packer MJ, Walmsley M, Lagog M, Ranford-Cartwright LC, et al. (1995) Mating patterns in malaria parasite populations of Papua New Guinea. Science 269: 1709–1711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Betuela I, Rosanas-Urgell A, Kiniboro B, Stanisic DI, Samol L, et al. (2012) Relapses contribute significantly to the risk of Plasmodium vivax infection and disease in Papua New Guinean children 1–5 years of age. J INFECT DIS 206: 1771–1780. 10.1093/infdis/jis580 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Desowitz RS, Spark RA (1987) Malaria in the Maprik area of the Sepik region, Papua New Guinea: 1957–1984. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 81: 175–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Taylor JE, Pacheco MA, Bacon DJ, Beg MA, Machado RL, et al. (2013) The Evolutionary History of Plasmodium vivax as Inferred from Mitochondrial Genomes: Parasite Genetic Diversity in the Americas. Mol Biol Evol 30: 2050–2064. 10.1093/molbev/mst104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Joy DA, Feng X, Mu J, Furuya T, Chotivanich K, et al. (2003) Early origin and recent expansion of Plasmodium falciparum. Science 300: 318–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Tanabe K, Jombart T, Horibe S, Palacpac NMQ, Honma H, et al. (2013) Plasmodium falciparum mitochondrial genetic diversity exhibits isolation-by-distance patterns supporting a sub-Saharan African origin. Mitochondrion 13: 630–636. 10.1016/j.mito.2013.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Mueller I, Galinski MR, Baird JK, Carlton JM, Kochar DK, et al. (2009) Key gaps in the knowledge of Plasmodium vivax, a neglected human malaria parasite. Lancet Infect Dis 9: 555–566. 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70177-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Shanks GD (2012) Control and Elimination of Plasmodium vivax. Adv Parasitol 80: 301–341. 10.1016/B978-0-12-397900-1.00006-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. White NJ (2011) Determinants of relapse periodicity in Plasmodium vivax malaria. Malar J 10: 297 10.1186/1475-2875-10-297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Lum JK, Kaneko A, Tanabe K, Takahashi N, Björkman A, et al. (2004) Malaria dispersal among islands: human mediated Plasmodium falciparum gene flow in Vanuatu, Melanesia. Acta Trop 90: 181–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Mu J (2005) Host Switch Leads to Emergence of Plasmodium vivax Malaria in Humans. Mol Biol Evol 22: 1686–1693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Hairston NG, Bang FB, Maier J (1947) Malaria in the natives of New Guinea. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 40: 795–807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Kazura JW, Siba PM, Betuela I, Mueller I (2012) Research challenges and gaps in malaria knowledge in Papua New Guinea. Acta Trop 121: 274–280. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Kasehagen LJ, Mueller I, Mcnamara DT, Bockarie MJ, Kiniboro B, et al. (2006) Changing patterns of Plasmodium blood-stage infections in the Wosera region of Papua New Guinea monitored by light microscopy and high throughput PCR diagnosis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 75: 588–596. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Sutton PL (2013) A call to arms: on refining Plasmodium vivax microsatellite marker panels for comparing global diversity Malaria Journal 12:447–559. 10.1186/1475-2875-12-447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The genotype data is available in the Supporting Information Files.