Skip to main content
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy logoLink to Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
. 2015 Jan 5;70(5):1443–1452. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku547

Early agr activation correlates with vancomycin treatment failure in multi-clonotype MRSA endovascular infections

Wessam Abdelhady 1,, Liang Chen 2,, Arnold S Bayer 1,3, Kati Seidl 4, Michael R Yeaman 1,3, Barry N Kreiswirth 2, Yan Q Xiong 1,3,*
PMCID: PMC4398469  PMID: 25564565

Abstract

Objectives

Persistent MRSA infections are especially relevant to endovascular infections and correlate with suboptimal outcomes. However, the virulence signatures of Staphylococcus aureus that drive such persistence outcomes are not well defined. In the current study, we investigated correlations between accessory gene regulator (agr) activation and the outcome of vancomycin treatment in an experimental model of infective endocarditis (IE) due to MRSA strains with different agr and clonal complex (CC) types.

Methods

Twelve isolates with the four most common MRSA CC and agr types (CC5-agr II, CC8-agr I, CC30-agr III and CC45-agr I) were evaluated for heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA), agr function, agrA and RNAIII transcription, agr locus sequences, virulence and response to vancomycin in the IE model.

Results

Early agr RNAIII activation (beginning at 2 h of growth) in parallel with strong δ-haemolysin production correlated with persistent outcomes in the IE model following vancomycin therapy. Importantly, such treatment failures occurred across the range of CC/agr types studied. In addition, these MRSA strains: (i) were vancomycin susceptible in vitro; (ii) were not hVISA or vancomycin tolerant; and (iii) did not evolve hVISA phenotypes or perturbed δ-haemolysin activity in vivo following vancomycin therapy. Moreover, agr locus sequence analyses revealed no common point mutations that correlated with either temporal RNAIII transcription or vancomycin treatment outcomes, encompassing different CC and agr types.

Conclusions

These data suggest that temporal agr RNAIII activation and agr functional profiles may be useful biomarkers to predict the in vivo persistence of endovascular MRSA infections despite vancomycin therapy.

Keywords: bacteria, antibiotics, resistance

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common cause of endovascular infections, including infective endocarditis (IE), and the second most frequent cause of bacteraemia.1,2 Invasive infections such as IE, particularly those caused by MRSA strains, are associated with a high mortality (15%–40%).35 In addition, the high rates of clinical failure on vancomycin (even with CLSI-defined ‘susceptible’ strains) and the growing problem of daptomycin non-susceptibility, have further complicated the management of patients with invasive MRSA infections.5,6

The pathogenesis of S. aureus is largely controlled by regulatory networks composed of: (i) global regulons (e.g. sarA); (ii) two-component regulatory systems (e.g. agr and saeRS); and (iii) downstream effector genes (e.g. hla).7,8 Central to the orchestration of this regulatory network is the quorum-sensing operon agr. Of note, agr consists of two transcription domains, RNAII and RNAIII, driven by the divergent promoters P2 and P3, respectively.9 RNAII encodes a quorum-sensing system and RNAIII is the effector molecule of the agr system. In vitro, agr down-regulates many pivotal cell surface proteins involved in tissue colonization while up-regulating exoproteins associated with host cell damage.9 In vitro studies have suggested that the temporal activation of agr is an important determinant of agr functionality; i.e. earlier versus later agr activation correlates with intact versus attenuated function, respectively.6,10 As most of the available data on agr expression and regulatory impacts have only been obtained in vitro, an important question relates to how such temporal regulatory functions translate to the in vivo scenario, particularly in the context of endovascular MRSA infections that persist versus resolve after antibiotic treatment.

We previously demonstrated a positive correlation between early-onset agr RNAIII activation and resistance to vancomycin treatment in an experimental model of IE.6 Although intriguing, these initial studies were somewhat limited: (i) they were restricted to strains from only two clonotypes (CC45-agr I and CC5-agr II); and (ii) they did not account for other genotypic influences on outcomes such as variations of agr types. Thus, it remains unknown whether the relationship between the temporal RNAIII activation profiles and antibiotic treatment outcomes is CC and/or agr type-specific in endovascular infection. Therefore, in the current investigation, we sought to validate and extend upon our prior observations, using a broad range of the most common clonotypes causing invasive MRSA infections such as IE.1113 The overarching goals of this project were: (i) to assess key genetic strategies used by MRSA to resist antimicrobial therapy (e.g. early agr activation); and (ii) to identify novel biomarkers that correlate with the phenotype of persistent endovascular MRSA infection.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

In the current study, we selected two CC5-agr II, four CC8-agr I and two CC30-agr III MRSA clinical isolates; in addition, we chose four previously sequenced reference strains of S. aureus (one for each CC type, including CC45) as relevant genetic controls (B. N. Kreiswirth, unpublished data; Table 1). These strains were from a multinational clinical trial collection and other sources14 and were pre-selected based on their relative δ-haemolysin activities as outlined below. Unless otherwise stated, all S. aureus strains were grown at 37°C either in tryptic soy broth (TSB; Difco) or TSB agar plates. Stocks were kept at –80°C in brain heart infusion (Difco) broth supplemented with 10% glycerol.

Table 1.

Genotypic characteristics of and vancomycin MICs for study isolates

Strains CC agr group SCCmec spa type (motif) Source Location (reference) Year Vancomycin MIC (mg/L)
Clinical isolates
 26997 5 II IV 2 (TJMBMDMGMK) blood USA 2009 1.0
 31190 5 II II 2 (TJMBMDMGMK) sputum USA 1996 1.0
 29439 8 I IV 1037 (YHGFMBO) SSTI Colombia 2008 1.0
 30279 8 I VIII 1 (YHGFMBQBLO) SSTI USA 2010 2.0
 31082 8 I IV 139 (YGFMBLO) blood USA 2009 2.0
 30568 8 I IV 7 (YHGCMBQBLO) blood USA 2010 2.0
 33367 30 III IV 19 (XKAKAOMQ) wound Romania 2005 1.0
 17130 30 III II 16 (WGKAKAOMQQQ) SSTI USA 2007 1.0
Reference strains
 36096 5 II IV 2 (TJMBMDMGMK) blood USA 2010 2.0
 19069 (USA300-FPR3757) 8 I IV 1 (YHGFMBQBLO) abscess USA ND 2.0
 22033 (WBG10049) 30 III IV 19 (XKAKAOMQ) ND Australia 1999 2.0
 21314 45 I MSSA XKAKBEMBKB blood France 2002 2.0

ND, no data available; SSTI, skin and soft tissue infection.

agr, SCCmec, spa, CC typing and agr locus sequence

The agr group was determined by a multiplex PCR assay described elsewhere,15 while the SCCmec type was examined using a multiplex real-time PCR published previously.16 The spa typing was conducted according to a protocol described before; the corresponding clonal complex (CC) of each strain was inferred based on the spa types.17 Full-length agr locus sequencing was performed as previously described.6

MICs, kill curves and population analyses

The determination of vancomycin MICs was conducted by broth microdilution as recommended by the CLSI.18 In vitro, vancomycin kill curves and population analyses were carried out to detect vancomycin tolerance and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA), respectively.19 All in vitro experiments were performed at least twice for each strain on different days.

δ-Haemolysin activity

δ-Haemolysin activity was assayed by cross-streaking the test strains perpendicularly to RN4220, a strain that is a hyperproducer of β-haemolysin but that does not produce α-haemolysin.6 Strains SH1000 and SH1001 (the agr mutant of SH1000) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. δ-Haemolytic activity was denoted by an enhanced area of haemolysis at the intersection of the RN4220 streak and the test strain streaks as described.6 In addition, the δ-haemolysin activity of each strain was semi-quantitatively scored by two investigators involved in this study who were blinded to the isolate numbers, as follows: non-detectable, weak and strong. All experiments were conducted at least three times on separate days.

agrA and RNAIII transcription by quantitative RT–PCR

It is well accepted that transcription from P2 and P3 occurs in a strictly AgrA-dependent manner. However, recent studies have identified that core virulence factors in various S. aureus strains depend either on RNAIII or AgrA for regulation.20 Thus, in the current study, we defined the temporal transcription profiles of both agrA and RNAIII (as surrogate biomarkers of global agr operon activation) by qRT–PCR analyses.6 In brief, overnight cultures of S. aureus were diluted 100-fold in fresh TSB medium and grown at 37°C in a shaking incubator. Cells were harvested at 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 h of growth, representing the early-, mid-, late-, post-exponential phases, and the stationary phase, respectively. Quantitative real-time PCR was carried out using an ABI Prism 7000 instrument (Applied Biosystems) and the SYBR green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems). Reaction mixtures were prepared using the 100 nM primers listed in Table 2. A well-characterized gene, gyrB, was used as an internal control.6,21 Relative target gene expression was calculated as the differences in cycle thresholds (ΔCT) (gyrBCT – target gene CT) for all samples.21 qRT–PCR experiments were performed using at least two biological replicates, with each one tested in triplicate.

Table 2.

Primers used in this study

Primer Sequence (5′–3′) Reference
gyrB-F CGCAGGCGATTTTACCATTA 6
gyrB-R GCTTTCGCTAGATCAAAGTCG 6
RNAIII-F GCCATCCCAACTTAATAACCA 6
RNAIII-R TGTTGTTTACGATAGCTTACATGC 6
agrA-F CGAAGACGATCCAAAACAAAG 48
agrA-R ATGTTACCAACTGGGTCATGC 48

Experimental rabbit IE model

It was important to assess the potential translatability of our in vitro findings in a realistic and relevant infection model in vivo. A catheter-induced model of IE affecting the aortic valve in rabbits was used to study the composite metrics of virulence and responsiveness to vancomycin therapy among the S. aureus strains used in the study.6,22 The animals were maintained in accordance with the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care criteria. The Animal Research Committee (IACUC) of the Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center approved all the animal studies.

To assess the relative intrinsic virulence of the strains, infected animals (∼105 cfu, representing the ID95 inoculum) were euthanized at 24 h after intravenous challenge by a rapid intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbital (200 mg/kg; Abbott Laboratories). The cardiac vegetations, kidneys and spleen were then removed under sterile conditions and quantitatively cultured.6,22 The tissue densities of S. aureus were calculated as the mean log10 cfu/g (±SD).

To assess the response to vancomycin therapy, animals with IE were randomized at 24 h post-infection to receive either no therapy (controls) or vancomycin therapy (15 mg/kg, intravenously, twice daily for 3 days). This is a standard effective dose of vancomycin in the experimental model of IE caused by vancomycin-susceptible staphylococcal strains.6,22 At 24 h after the last dose of vancomycin, the animals were sacrificed and the target tissues removed and quantitatively cultured as described above.

In vivo population analysis

An in vivo population analysis assay was performed to determine whether the in vivo emergence of the hVISA phenotype might explain the subsequent impact on either the virulence of the organism or the responsiveness to the antibiotic. A volume of 10 μL of vegetation homogenate was plated directly onto TSA agar plates containing serial concentrations of vancomycin (0.125–8 mg/L) as described above.

In vivo assessment of δ-haemolysin activity

Similar to the hVISA analyses above, it was important to test whether δ-haemolysin activity among the infecting strains was altered during in vivo passage. Thus, an in vivo assessment of δ-haemolysin production was performed by cross-streaking vegetation homogenates perpendicularly to RN4220 as described above.

Statistical analysis

To compare tissue counts of S. aureus in vancomycin-treated versus untreated control animals, univariate analyses were performed using the Student's t-test. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

In vitro susceptibility to vancomycin

Vancomycin MICs for the study strains were all in the susceptible range as outlined by the CLSI guidelines (Table 1). In vitro population analyses of the isolates revealed no hVISA phenotypes [Figure S1 (A1, B1 and C1), available as Supplementary data at JAC Online; data not shown for the four reference strains]. Killing curve assays demonstrated no evidence of in vitro vancomycin tolerance (data not shown).

In vitro δ-haemolysin activities

A total of two CC5, three CC8, one CC30 and one CC45 isolates produced strong zones of haemolysis due to δ-haemolysin activity (Figure S2). In contrast, the other five strains exhibited weak or non-detectable δ-haemolysin production (Figure S2).

agrA and RNAIII transcriptions

The initiation of transcription of RNAIII strictly relies upon the expression of agrA, in an RNAII-dependent manner. Our data support these observations as the transcription of agrA was observed in all strains with RNAIII expression except strain 30568 (Figure 1a and b for agrA and RNAIII expression, respectively). In addition, a rapid increase in RNAIII transcription occurred in the post-exponential growth phase, concomitant with a cell-density-dependent expression of the agr operon (Figure 1b). More importantly, the seven strains with strong δ-haemolysin activity (one CC5, two CC8 and one CC30 clinical isolate, and three of the four reference strains) exhibited a relatively early onset of RNAIII expression, beginning at 2–3 h of growth (Figure 1b). The other five strains had very low-level or no RNAIII transcripts detectable before 4 h (Figure 1b). These data indicated that the early onset of RNAIII transcription correlated with strong δ-haemolysin production, independent of the CC/agr genotype. As the growth rates for all the study strains were similar, the observed differences in the onset of RNAIII expression were not due to differences in growth dynamics (data not shown).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

In vitro expression of agrA (a) and RNAIII (b) in all S. aureus strains studied at 2, 3, 4, 8 and 24 h of growth. Data were obtained by RT–PCR and relative transcript levels of agrA and RNAIII represent the mean (+SD) of at least two biological replicates (fold changes versus gyrB). Strains with strong δ-haemolysin activity are underlined.

agr locus sequence analyses

We sequenced the entire agr locus of the 12 study strains (including RNAII, RNAIII and their respective promoter regions; Table 3). The results in two CC5-agr II strains (exhibiting strong δ-haemolysin activity and an early onset of RNAIII activation) revealed identical agr locus sequences but these differed from the agr sequence reference strain N315 by only one nucleotide between agrD and agrC. The agr sequence of another CC5-agr II strain, 31190 (having weak δ-haemolysin activity and a late onset of expression of RNAIII), differed by one nucleotide from these two strains within the intergenic region between hld and agrB. However, it is not clear whether this agr mutational event was related to the different δ-haemolysin activity observed in this strain set. Two CC8-agr I (31082 and 30568) and two CC30-agr III (33367 and 22033) strains with different δ-haemolysin activities had the same agr sequence as their respective reference strains. Taken together, these results indicate that no consensus genetic determinants in the agr locus were identified as being predictive of agr functionality crossing different CC and agr genetic types.

Table 3.

agr locus sequence, δ-haemolysin and RNAIII activation of the study strains

Strains CC agr group δ-Haemolysin activity RNAIII activation agr sequence Reference strains
Clinical isolates
 26997 5 II strong early T→A between agrD and agrC N315
 31190 5 II weak late T→A between agrD and agrC, G→A between hld and agrB, N315
 29439 8 I strong early T→A in agrC (F309I) USA 300
 30279 8 I weak late A→G in RNAIII, T→A in P3 promoter region, A→T in agrB (I171F), T→A in agrC (F309I) USA 300
 31082 8 I strong early T→A in P3 promoter region, T→A in agrC (F309I) USA300
 30568 8 I none none T→A in P3 promoter region, T→A in agrC (F309I) USA300
 33367 30 III strong early RNAIII 386A del, agrC (R55G) MRSA 252
 17130 30 III weak late none MRSA 252
Reference strains
 36096 5 II strong early T→A between agrD and agrC N315
 19069 (USA300-FPR3757) 8 I strong early none USA300
 22033 (WBG10049) 30 III weak late RNAIII 386A del, agrC (R55G) MRSA 252
 21314 45 I strong early none CA-347 (CP006044)

Intrinsic virulence and responsiveness to vancomycin in the IE model

The intrinsic virulence of the study strains in the IE model (based on achievable target-tissue counts of S. aureus) was similar among the study isolates (Figure 2). Therefore, there was no obvious relationship between the above agr metrics, CC types and intrinsic virulence of the strains studied in this model of infection.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

S. aureus densities in the target tissues in the IE model in the presence versus absence of vancomycin therapy for 3 days (panels a, b and c represent clinical CC5, CC8 and CC30 S. aureus strains, respectively, and panel d represents four reference strains). Each dot represents one rabbit and the horizontal black bars indicate the means of the observations. Strains with strong δ-haemolysin activities are underlined. VAN, vancomycin.

In contrast, our data revealed a direct correlation between temporal agr RNAIII expression in vitro and vancomycin therapy in vivo. For example, the vancomycin therapy of animals infected with the five strains that exhibited a late onset of RNAIII and weak or no δ-haemolysin activity in vitro (clinical isolates 31190, 30279, 30568 and 17130, and reference strain 22033) resulted in uniform and highly significant reductions in MRSA counts in all the target tissues (Figure 2). Thus, we observed a ≥5 log10 cfu reduction in the vegetation counts and ≥3 log10 cfu reduction in the kidney and spleen counts compared with the respective untreated control groups (P < 0.0001 for all strains and all three target tissues). In contrast, animals with IE caused by strains with strong δ-haemolysin activity and an early onset of RNAIII transcription showed one of two outcomes: (i) no response to vancomycin treatment, with residual target-tissue MRSA densities similar to those in the respective untreated controls (the 33367 clinical isolate and the 36096 reference strain; Figure 2); or (ii) a <3 log10 cfu reduction in target-tissue counts (clinical isolates 26997, 29439 and 31082, and reference strains 19069 and 21314; Figure 2). Importantly, there was no significant difference in the weight of the vegetations between the groups (data not shown). Therefore, the microbiological difference in vegetation counts was not impacted by the differences in structure or size of the vegetations.

In vivo population analyses

Figure S1 (A2, B2, B3 and C2) shows the in vivo population analyses from vegetation homogenates of the study clinical isolates surviving vancomycin therapy in the IE model (data not shown for the four reference strains). No subpopulations that were hetero-resistant to vancomycin were observed in the vegetations from any animals (Figure S1; data not shown for the control animals without treatment). We were unable to test for potential hVISA phenotypes in strains highly susceptible to vancomycin therapy in the IE model due to the low residual bacterial counts of the vegetations (<3 log10 cfu/g).

In vivo δ-haemolysin activity

No changes in profiles of δ-haemolysin activity were observed in any isolates after passage through the IE model (Figure S2; data not shown for the four reference strains).

Discussion

S. aureus is a highly adaptable bacterium capable of dynamic changes in its virulence and resistance phenotypes in the face of exposure to host defences or administered antibiotics. As a result of such capabilities, ‘persistent’ endovascular MRSA infections frequently occur despite seemingly appropriate antibiotic therapy. This reality represents a daunting and increasingly life-threatening clinical syndrome. The fundamental phenotypic and genotypic virulence and resistance ‘signatures’ of S. aureus that drive such persistent clinical outcomes are not well defined. Thus, the identification of potential biomarkers that specifically characterize persistent S. aureus strains is urgently needed. The current study was designed to contribute new insights that might help to address this void in knowledge.

The agr operon plays an important and complex role in the pathogenesis of MRSA infections.9,23,24 In addition, polymorphisms in agrD and agrC have been utilized to genotypically define the major S. aureus agr groups (I–IV).2527 Several previous studies have suggested an association of specific agr groups with distinct clinical syndromes involving S. aureus.25,26 For example, agr group II has been associated with a poor response to vancomycin therapy in patients with MRSA infections.28 Of note, such linkage of the agr group II genotype to suboptimal treatment outcomes has not been verified in more recent reports using a rabbit model of IE.6 Interestingly, in addition to agr genotypes, four CC types (CC5, CC8, CC30 and CC45) are reported to predominate in serious S. aureus infections.29,30 Moreover, distinct CC types show a differing potential to cause invasive disease.31 For instance, CC5 and CC30 have been reported to be associated with more severe infections.11 Furthermore, Miller et al.32 recently correlated the CC22 genotype with cases of IE. Conversely, Feil et al.33 reported that disease isolates were equally represented across all CC types, suggesting that the link between CC genotype and the propensity to cause specific disease syndromes is at best inconsistent. The above examples illustrate how the genotypic and phenotypic plasticity of S. aureus is likely to afford a variety of survival strategies and advantages in distinct host defence settings. Thus, rather than seeking a single gene or distinct host phenotype that enables persistence, our work seeks to identify and validate more integrated signals of adaptive responses in S. aureus that are associated with virulence and antimicrobial resistance.

Vancomycin has remained a stalwart for the treatment of invasive MRSA infections. We recently studied the relationship of agr RNAIII expression with vancomycin treatment outcomes in experimental IE due to 10 clinical MRSA strains with two distinct genetic backgrounds (CC5-agr II and CC45-agr I). These investigations demonstrated that early-onset agr RNAIII activation correlated with failures of vancomycin treatment in this model.6 Therefore, our current studies were designed to further investigate the question of whether this putative correlation between the temporal agr RNAIII activation profiles and the outcome of antibiotic treatment is CC-agr type specific or more generic across CC-agr types. In this regard, our strategy was strengthened by the use of clinical MRSA isolates representing the most common CC-agr types (CC5-agr II, CC8-agr I and CC30-agr III) in comparison with four respective S. aureus reference strains.

Several key insights emerged from this study. We found that the overall temporal transcription of RNAIII was strain dependent but CC/agr type independent. Most importantly, consistent with our previous observation,6 we found that early-onset agr RNAIII activation (beginning at 2–3 h of growth) significantly correlated with reduced vancomycin efficacy in experimental IE. The exact mechanism(s) by which early agr activation provides the organism with reduced vancomycin susceptibility in vivo in this model is yet to be defined. However, in this regard, we have recently confirmed that strains exhibiting early RNAIII activation (which are vancomycin non-responders in the IE model) differed substantially from the strains showing later RNAIII expression (vancomycin responders in the same model) in terms of: (i) lower vancomycin binding; (ii) increased intrinsic biofilm formation; (iii) higher survival in the presence of vancomycin within biofilms in the presence or absence of catheters; (iv) enhanced biofilm formation during vancomycin exposure below the MIC; (v) significantly greater damage to endothelial cells;19,34 and (vi) reduced killing by certain host defence antimicrobial peptides.35 Each of these differences may contribute individually or in combination to the strain-specific vancomycin treatment outcomes in the IE model. Importantly, we performed an in vitro growth assay and found that all the study strains had similar growth rates. In addition, all the study isolates had similar fitness profiles in the IE model: (i) all strains had the same ID95 for the induction of IE (105 cfu/animal); and (ii) the intrinsic virulence of the study strains in the IE model, based on achievable target-tissue counts of S. aureus, was similar among the study isolates (Figure 2). These data indicate that the observed differences in the onset of agr RNAIII expression and treatment outcomes were not due to differences in in vivo growth dynamics. In contrast to our observations, other studies have suggested that agr dysfunction can be associated with decreased vancomycin efficacy and persistent bacteraemia in MRSA infections.5,27,3638 For instance, Fowler et al.5 reported that δ-haemolysin activity was less common in persistent versus resolving MRSA isolates. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance.5 In addition, these conflicting findings may reflect geographical or other epidemiological patterns. Of note, it has been reported that even though the lack of δ-haemolysin production is a phenotypic marker of agr dysfunction,5,39,40 its absence does not necessarily correlate with the absence of RNAIII transcripts.41

Paralleling our experimental model outcomes, clinical treatment failures with vancomycin occur fairly commonly even with ‘vancomycin-susceptible’ S. aureus strains.42 Some studies have suggested that an in vivo evolution of the hVISA phenotype during therapy can be responsible for such clinical failures.43 However, in the current study, we could not confirm hVISA development in vivo during vancomycin therapy.

Consistent with previous studies from our laboratories6 and others,4446 we found no common or consensus SNPs within the agr locus that predicted its temporal activation profiles and/or functionality in vitro, or vancomycin responsiveness in experimental IE crossing different CC/agr types. In support of our findings, other investigations have also found no differences in the agr sequence between clinical pairs of parental vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus strains and hVISA/VISA strains evolving during antibiotic-persistent infection.45,46 Taken together, these findings suggest that strain-specific gain-of-function or loss-of-function readouts of genetic determinants in the agr locus cannot yet be linked to agr functionality and vancomycin treatment outcomes. This observation also implies that genotypic factors beyond or interacting with the agr locus may play a role in adaptive response phenotypes with respect to virulence and antibiotic resistance outcomes in vivo.

Our investigations have several limitations. For example, hVISA strains were not studied in our model; such strains may be very important as they have been associated with high frequencies of treatment failure and persistent bacteraemia.43,47 In addition, additional S. aureus isolates from patients with known endovascular infections should be evaluated to better understand the precise factors responsible for persistent outcomes in this clinical context. Moreover, based on current findings, we do not know whether the relationship between the RNAIII activation profiles and the outcome of antibiotic treatment is ‘vancomycin specific’ or more broad range against other antimicrobials. Although this is beyond the scope of the present study, future studies should examine this potential correlation.

In summary, we have demonstrated that: (i) early agr RNAIII activation, although not ‘causal’,6 is a ‘biomarker’ or ‘signature’ predictive of an antibiotic-persistent outcome; and (ii) factors outside the agr locus are responsible for the genetic linkage between temporal agr RNAIII activation and the outcome of vancomycin treatment in the IE model. The exact mechanism(s) that correlate with the failure of vancomycin treatment remain to be fully elucidated. Studies including whole-genome sequencing, susceptibilities to the peptides involved in host defences against antimicrobial agents (e.g. platelet microbicidal proteins and human neutrophil peptide 1), biofilm formation, endothelial cell damage, vancomycin binding, etc. are in progress in our laboratories to better define these mechanism(s).

Funding

This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (grants R21AI097657 to Y. Q. X., RO1AI-39108 to A. S. B. and AI111 to M. R. Y.); and the U.S. Department of Defense (grant W81XWH-12-2-0101 to M. R. Y.).

Transparency declarations

None to declare.

Supplementary data

Figures S1 and S2 are available as Supplementary data at JAC Online (http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/).

Supplementary Data

References

  • 1.Fowler VG, Jr, Miro JM, Hoen B, et al. Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a consequence of medical progress. JAMA 2005; 293: 3012–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, et al. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39: 309–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Naber CK. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management strategies. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48 Suppl 4: S231–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Khatib R, Johnson LB, Fakih MG, et al. Persistence in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: incidence, characteristics of patients and outcome. Scand J Infect Dis 2006; 38: 7–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fowler VG, Jr, Sakoulas G, McIntyre LM, et al. Persistent bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection is associated with agr dysfunction and low-level in vitro resistance to thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein. J Infect Dis 2004; 190: 1140–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Seidl K, Chen L, Bayer AS, et al. Relationship of agr expression and function with virulence and vancomycin treatment outcomes in experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 5631–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cheung AL, Bayer AS, Zhang G, et al. Regulation of virulence determinants in vitro and in vivo in Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Immun Med Microbiol 2004; 40: 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Novick RP. Pathogenicity factors and their regulation. In: Fischett VA, Novick RP, Ferretti JJ, et al., eds. Gram-positive Pathogens. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology, 2000; 392–407. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Novick RP, Geisinger E. Quorum sensing in staphylococci. Annu Rev Genet 2008; 42: 541–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Traber K, Novick R. A slipped-mispairing mutation in AgrA of laboratory strains and clinical isolates results in delayed activation of agr and failure to translate δ- and α-haemolysins. Mol Microbiol 2006; 59: 1519–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fowler VG, Jr, Nelson CL, McIntyre LM, et al. Potential associations between hematogenous complications and bacterial genotype in Staphylococcus aureus infection. J Infect Dis 2007; 196: 738–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McCalla C, Smyth DS, Robinson DA, et al. Microbiological and genotypic analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2008; 52: 3441–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nienaber JJ, Sharma Kuinkel BK, Clarke-Pearson M, et al. Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis isolates are associated with clonal complex 30 genotype and a distinct repertoire of enterotoxins and adhesins. J Infect Dis 2011; 204: 704–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fowler VG, Jr, Boucher HW, Corey GR, et al. Daptomycin versus standard therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 653–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lina G, Boutite F, Tristan A, et al. Bacterial competition for human nasal cavity colonization: role of Staphylococcal agr alleles. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003; 69: 18–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen L, Mediavilla JR, Oliveira DC, et al. Multiplex real-time PCR for rapid staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec typing. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47: 3692–706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mathema B, Mediavilla J, Kreiswirth BN. Sequence analysis of the variable number tandem repeat in Staphylococcus aureus protein A gene: spa typing. Methods Mol Biol 2008; 431: 285–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: M7-A9 . CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Abdelhady W, Bayer AS, Seidl K, et al. Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in an in vitro catheter-related biofilm model correlates with poor therapeutic outcomes in experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother 2013; 57: 1447–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Queck SY, Jameson-Lee M, Villaruz AE, et al. RNAIII-independent target gene control by the agr quorum-sensing system: insight into the evolution of virulence regulation in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Cell 2008; 32: 150–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Abdelhady W, Bayer AS, Seidl K, et al. Impact of vancomycin on sarA-mediated biofilm formation: role in persistent endovascular infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis 2014; 209: 1231–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xiong YQ, Fowler VG, Yeaman MR, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in vitro and in an experimental endocarditis model. J Infect Dis 2009; 199: 201–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cheung GY, Wang R, Khan BA, et al. Role of the accessory gene regulator agr in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis. Infect Immun 2011; 79: 1927–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Traber KE, Lee E, Benson S, et al. agr function in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Microbiol 2008; 154: 2265–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ji G, Beavis R, Novick RP. Bacterial interference caused by autoinducing peptide variants. Science 1997; 276: 2027–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jarraud S, Lyon GJ, Figueiredo AM, et al. Exfoliatin-producing strains define a fourth agr specificity group in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 2000; 182: 6517–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sakoulas G, Eliopoulos GM, Moellering RC, Jr, et al. Accessory gene regulator (agr) locus in geographically diverse Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46: 1492–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Moise-Broder PA, Sakoulas G, Eliopoulos GM, et al. Accessory gene regulator group II polymorphism in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is predictive of failure of vancomycin therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38: 1700–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wertheim HF, Melles DC, Vos MC, et al. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis 2005; 5: 751–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Enright MC, Robinson DA, Randle G, et al. The evolutionary history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). PNAS 2002; 99: 7687–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brueggemann AB, Griffiths DT, Meats E, et al. Clonal relationships between invasive and carriage Streptococcus pneumoniae and serotype- and clone-specific differences in invasive disease potential. J Infect Dis 2003; 187: 1424–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Miller CE, Batra R, Cooper BS, et al. An association between bacterial genotype combined with a high-vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration and risk of endocarditis in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 54: 591–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Feil EJ, Cooper JE, Grundmann H, et al. How clonal is Staphylococcus aureus? J Bacteriol 2003; 185: 3307–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Seidl K, Bayer AS, McKinnell JA, et al. In vitro endothelial cell damage is positively correlated with enhanced virulence and poor vancomycin responsiveness in experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Microbiol 2011; 13: 1530–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Seidl K, Bayer AS, Fowler VG, Jr, et al. Combinatorial phenotypic signatures distinguish persistent from resolving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia isolates. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 575–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sakoulas G, Moellering RC, Jr, Eliopoulos GM. Adaptation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the face of vancomycin therapy. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42 Suppl 1: S40–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sakoulas G, Eliopoulos GM, Fowler VG, Jr, et al. Reduced susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to vancomycin and platelet microbicidal protein correlates with defective autolysis and loss of accessory gene regulator (agr) function. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 2687–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Schweizer ML, Furuno JP, Sakoulas G, et al. Increased mortality with accessory gene regulator (agr) dysfunction in Staphylococcus aureus among bacteremic patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011; 55: 1082–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Moise PA, Forrest A, Bayer AS, et al. Factors influencing time to vancomycin-induced clearance of nonendocarditis methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: role of platelet microbicidal protein killing and agr genotypes. J Infect Dis 2010; 201: 233–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sakoulas G, Eliopoulos GM, Moellering RC, Jr, et al. Staphylococcus aureus accessory gene regulator (agr) group II: is there a relationship to the development of intermediate-level glycopeptide resistance? J Infect Dis 2003; 187: 929–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wright JS, 3rd, Traber KE, Corrigan R, et al. The agr radiation: an early event in the evolution of staphylococci. J Bacteriol 2005; 187: 5585–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Moise PA, Schentag JJ. Vancomycin treatment failures in Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2000; 16 Suppl 1: S31–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Moreillon P, Bizzini A, Giddey M, et al. Vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus selected during vancomycin therapy of experimental endocarditis are not detected by culture-based diagnostic procedures and persist after treatment arrest. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012; 67: 652–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Howden BP, Johnson PD, Ward PB, et al. Isolates with low-level vancomycin resistance associated with persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006; 50: 3039–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Howden BP, Smith DJ, Mansell A, et al. Different bacterial gene expression patterns and attenuated host immune responses are associated with the evolution of low-level vancomycin resistance during persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. BMC Microbiol 2008; 8: 39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Park C, Shin NY, Byun JH, et al. Downregulation of RNAIII in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus strains regardless of the presence of agr mutation. J Med Microbiol 2012; 61: 345–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Howden BP, Davies JK, Johnson PD, et al. Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains: resistance mechanisms, laboratory detection, and clinical implications. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23: 99–139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Burnside K, Lembo A, de Los Reyes M, et al. Regulation of hemolysin expression and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus by a serine/threonine kinase and phosphatase. PLoS One 2010; 5: e11071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

Articles from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES