Skip to main content
World Journal of Gastroenterology logoLink to World Journal of Gastroenterology
. 2005 Aug 21;11(31):4794–4799. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i31.4794

Vitamin D receptor gene Tru9I polymorphism and risk for incidental sporadic colorectal adenomas

You-Ling Gong 1,2,3,4, Da-Wen Xie 1,2,3,4, Zong-Lin Deng 1,2,3,4, Roberd M Bostick 1,2,3,4, Xi-Jiang Miao 1,2,3,4, Jin-Hui Zhang 1,2,3,4, Zhi-Hong Gong 1,2,3,4
PMCID: PMC4398724  PMID: 16097046

Abstract

AIM: Recent laboratory and epidemiological studies suggest that vitamin D is a potential agent for colorectal cancer prevention. Its function is partially mediated by the vitamin D receptor (VDR). The aim of this study was to investigate whether a novel G (allele ‘U’)>A (allele ‘u’) polymorphism (Tru9I) in the VDR intron 8 region is associated with risk for colorectal adenoma in a colonoscopy-based case-control study.

METHODS: Genotyping for a total of 391 subjects was carried out through PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism.

RESULTS: The frequencies of ‘U’ and ‘u’ alleles were 89.3% and 10.7%, respectively. The ‘Uu’ and ‘uu’ genotypes were associated with decreased risk for adenoma (OR, 0.71; 95%CI, 0.40-1.25). The inverse association was more pronounced for multiple adenomas and adenomas that were larger had moderate or greater dysplasia, or were sessile: the odds ratios (ORs) were, 0.51 (95%CI, 0.21-1.24), 0.37 (95%CI, 0.11-1.28), 0.68 (95%CI, 0.33-1.41), and 0.36 (95%CI, 0.13-0.97) respectively. In joint/combined analyses, inverse associations were more obvious among those who had at least one ‘u’ allele and also were younger (OR, 0.60; 95%CI, 0.26-1.37), women (OR, 0.38; 95%CI, 0.17-0.88), did not smoke (OR, 0.39; 95%CI, 0.13-1.23), or took NSAID (OR, 0.38; 95%CI, 0.12-1.25), but no evidence existed for interactions with calcium or vitamin D intake.

CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the VDR Tru9I polymorphism may be associated with lower risk for colorectal adenoma, particularly in interaction with various risk factors, but not with calcium or vitamin D.

Keywords: Case-control study, Colorectal adenoma, Colorectal neoplasia, Vitamin D receptor, Genetic polymorphism

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the USA, with an annual incidence of 146 940 cases and 56 730 deaths[1]. It has been reported that in USA, CRC morbidity is greater in northern latitudes, which may in part be due to lower sun exposure[2]. Several epidemiological studies support the hypothesis that dermal vitamin D synthesis mediated by sunlight may protect against colorectal cancer; several found decreased risk for this disease with higher serum levels of vitamin D or with increasing dietary vitamin D intake[3-5]. The vitamin D receptor (VDR), a member of the steroid/thyroid receptor family, mediates genomic actions of the active metabolite of vitamin D [1,25(OH)2D3], and thus regulates cellular proliferation and differentiation[6-8] and induces apoptosis[9]. Recent studies show that VDR functions as a sensor of the colorectal carcinogen, lithocholic acid (LCA), inducing in vivo expression of the CYP3A family that detoxifies LCA in the liver and intestine[10]. Based on such findings, there has been increased interest in an interaction between vitamin D and the VDR gene and risk for colorectal cancer. Although contradictory results have been reported[11-13], evidence suggests that at least some VDR gene polymorphisms are related to the risk of CRC or adenoma[14-17].

Recently, a novel G>A polymorphism in the 3’-UTR region of the VDR gene was identified and designated as VDR Tru9I[18]. It is thought that the polymorphisms in this region of the VDR gene may affect its mRNA stability, possibly through linkage to other variants[19]. So far, no previous study has been reported on investigating the function of this polymorphism. In a epidemiological study, Gyorffy et al[20], found that the presence of the variant ‘u’ allele, combined with VDR ApaI ‘a’ and BsmI ‘b’ alleles, is associated with increased risk for type I diabetes mellitus in girls. To our knowledge, there has been no previously published study on a potential association between the VDR Tru9I polymorphism and colorectal adenoma risk. Previously, we found that different genetic polymorphisms might affect risk for colorectal adenoma: the cyclinD1 A/G polymorphism was associated with increased risk[21], and the p53-inducible ribonucleotide reductase small subunit 2 (p53R2) ‘AA’ genotype was strongly associated with increased risk in those with lower dietary nutrients including vitamins and calcium intakes (paper submitted). Herein, we report data from this same North Carolina case-control study on the association of the VDR Tru9I polymorphism and colorectal adenoma risk, alone and in interaction with various environmental risk factors for colorectal neoplasms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

From 1994 to 1997, the markers of adenomatous polyps (MAP) case-control study were conducted to assess the validity of colonic epithelial cell proliferation as a biomarker of risk for incident sporadic colorectal adenomatous polyps. Prior to beginning the study, MAP was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Wake Forest University, Bowman Gray School of Medicine in accordance with an assurance filed with and approved by the Department of Health and Human Services. Informed consent was obtained from each participant. Eligibility criteria for study subjects consisted of English speaking adults from 30 to 74 years of age, either sex or any race who were scheduled for elective outpatient colonoscopy by four large gastro-enterology practices in Winston-Salem and Charlotte, North Carolina. Patients were recruited for over 24 mo. Cases were identified as eligible colonoscopy patients who were determined to have study index pathologist-confirmed incident adenomatous polyps according to criteria adapted from the National Polyp Study[22]. Controls consisted of all eligible colonoscopy patients with no previous history of adenomatous polyps and who were found to be free of adenomatous polyps. Persons with familial polyposis, Gardner’s syndrome, ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s Disease, bowel resection, newly diagnosed recurrent adenomatous polyps, and incident colon cancer were excluded, as they were patients with past or prevalent cancer other than non-melanoma skin cancer.

Patients completed mailed questionnaires prior to their colonoscopies (to avoid bias) regarding family history of polyps or colon cancer, medical history, dietary information (via a semi-quantitative Willett 153-item Food Frequency Questionnaire), physical activity (via a modified Paffenbarger questionnaire), reproductive variables, body fat distribution, and their reasons for and the sequence of events leading to colonoscopy. Blood was drawn and stored at -70 °C for possible later measurement of various genotypes.

Preparation for colonoscopy included a 12 h fast and bowel cleansing with polyethylene glycol (GoLYTELY). Subjects willing to undergo biopsies had four quadrant biopsies taken from normal appearing mucosa in the rectum (10 cm above the anus), sigmoid colon, and cecum for a total of 16 biopsies. Information recorded included number of polyps, polyp size, polyp type (adenoma, hyperplastic, or mixed), adenoma subtype (tubular, villous, tubulo-villous), and the degree of dysplasia.

Subjects

Among all four clinical sites, 2 246 colonoscopy patients were identified. Of these, 669 were eligible on initial screening (eligibility rate 29.8%), and of these 633 were willing to discuss the study, 617 of these were contacted, and 417 of these signed consent and had study colonoscopies (consent rate 63.1%). Of the 417 participants, 259 had some type of polyp, and of these 179 had adenomatous polyps. Nine of the 417 patients were subsequently determined ineligible for the study, and an additional eight patients had incident colon cancer and were not eligible for the primary case-control analyses; thus, 400 possible patients were available for genotypic analysis. Of these 400 patients, viable DNA was isolated from 391 (171 cases and 220 controls) for genotyping.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was obtained from stored WBCs digested in 500 μL of lysis buffer (50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.2% SDS, 200 g/mL proteinase K) over night at 55 °C with shaking. The digestion was precipitated directly with isopropanol and the pellets were washed with 70% ethanol. The genomic DNA pellets (50-100 μg) were dissolved in 300-800 μL of TE buffer, of which about 1 μL was used for each PCR reaction. DNA was amplified following the primers designed for the exon 8 region of the VDR gene following the published DNA sequence (GenBank number: AY342401). An isoschizomer of Tru9I, MseI, was used in this study. The PCR (50 μL volume) was carried out in 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.4, 50 mmol/L KCl, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L dNTP, 0.5 mmol/L of each primer (5’-GCA GGG TAC AAA ACT TTG GAG -3’ as forward and a 5’-CCT CAT CAC CGA CAT CAT GTC -3’ as reverse), 80-120 ng of DNA template, and 2.5 units Taq polymerase (Gibco-Invitrogen). The solution was heated to 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 69 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C. The final reaction was extended 7 min at 72 °C. The PCR products (5 μL) were loaded onto a 3% 2:1 NuSieve-SeaKem gel for confirmation. The PCR products (10 μL) were then subjected to MseI restriction enzyme at 37 °C overnight. Bands for the wild-type (‘UU’) allele were not cut (177 bp); the ‘uu’ genotype was showed at 91 and 86 bp; and the heterozygote (‘Uu’) allele was cut into 177-, 91-, and 86-bp fragments.

Statistical analysis

Allelic frequencies for polymorphic VDR Tru9I G>A alleles were compared to those in previous study populations. VDR Tru9I G>A genotype (UU, Uu, uu) distributions for cases and controls were tested for adherence to the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

All statistical inquiries were conducted using R language version 1.9.0 from http://www.R-project.org. Descriptive comparisons (i.e., mean±SD, frequencies as percents) of cases and controls were conducted utilizing χ2 tests for categorical variables, and t test for continuous variables.

Multiple logistic regressions were utilized to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95%CI, adjusted for potential concluding factors, to estimate the strength of an association between VDR Tru9I genotype and risk for incident sporadic colorectal adenomas. The effect of VDR Tru9I genotype was analyzed utilizing a priori hypothesized low risk, common ‘UU’ genotype as the referent group. A ‘P’ test for trend was calculated across genotypes to detect a pattern of association.

Several risk factors were scrutinized as possible confo-unders or effect modifiers of the VDR Tru9I genotype-colorectal adenoma association. Among these were age, sex, race, body mass index, family history of colon cancer (FHCC), smoking, alcohol consumption, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, and total dietary intake of calcium and vitamin D. Criteria for inclusion of any covariate in the final model included: (1) biological plausibility; (2) whether it fits the model at P≤0.1; and (3) whether it altered the OR for the primary exposure variable by 10% or more. Final models for genotype main effects included age, sex, smoking status, drinking status, and FHCC. Models involving in the assessment of possible interactions between genotypes and various anti- and pro-proliferative and other key risk factors included age, sex, FHCC, NSAIDs, smoking status, and total intake of calcium and alcohol.

To examine potential gene-environment interactions of VDR Tru9I genotype and certain risk factors, stratified analyses were conducted. Continuous variables were dichotomized on median values for controls; furthermore, continuous dietary variables were categorized as sex-specific. Criteria for assessing effect modifiers were based on previous literature, biological plausibility, and whether or not risk estimates differed substantially across strata.

RESULTS

Adenoma cases were similar to the controls in respect to race, education status, and most dietary intakes (Table 1). However, cases were more likely to be a little older, male, and current drinkers or smokers. Controls were more likely to have histories of colon cancer in first-degree relatives.

Table 1.

Selected characteristics of cases and controls, MAP study, 1994-19971

Cases (n = 171) Controls (n = 220) P1
Demographic factors
Age (yr)2 58.4 (8.4) 55.8 (10.2) 0.006
Male (%) 60 36 <0.001
White (%) 89 89 0.98
College education (%) 19 23 0.38
Major risk factors
Family history of colon cancer (%) 14 31 <0.001
Currently smoke cigarettes (%) 30 20 0.02
Currently drink alcohol (%) 75 55 <0.001
NSAID3 use (%) 19 30 0.007
Dietary intakes
Total energy (kcal/d) 2 010 (30) 2 169 (1 999) 0.27
Total fat (g/d) 71.3 (39.9) 72.6 (65.9) 0.8
Total meat (serve/wk) 4.4 (1.4) 4.5 (1.4) 0.57
Total fruits and vegetables (serve/wk) 6.1 (3.6) 7.4 (10.2) 0.09
Total calcium (mg/d) 736 (406.6) 871 (757) 0.02
Total vitamin D (IU/d) 315 (258.2) 359 (374) 0.16
Total folate (mg/d) 416.7 (241.6) 467 (402) 0.12
Total alcohol (g/d) 7.4 (15.1) 4.8 (20.8) 0.14

1Adjusted for age, sex, total energy intake, history of colon cancer in a first degree relative, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, current smoking status, and total calcium and alcohol intakes;

2

mean±SD presented unless otherwise indicated, except for age, all other means are age adjusted; 3non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug.

There were significant differences in NSAID use and dietary calcium intake between cases and controls. The polymorphism distribution in present population was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (χ2 = 3.41, P = 0.07).

Table 2 presents the associations between VDR Tru9I genotypes and colorectal adenoma risk. The frequencies of VDR Tru9I ‘UU’, ‘Uu’, and ‘uu’ genotypes were 84.2%, 13.5%, and 2.3% in cases, and 77.8%, 20.3%, and 1.9% in controls, respectively. There were equivalent allele distributions for cases (‘U’ = 90.9%, ‘u’ = 9.1%) and controls (‘U’ = 88%, ‘u’ = 12%). A 29% decreased multivariable-adjusted OR (0.71; 95%CI, 0.40-1.25) was observed in ‘Uu’ and ‘uu’ carriers, compared to ‘UU’ carriers.

Table 2.

Frequencies of VDR Tru9I genotypes and associations with incident sporadic colorectal adenomas (MAP study), 1994-1997

VDR Tru9I genotype Cases (n = 171)
Controls (n = 220)
Adjusted OR1 95%CI2
n % n %
UU 144 84.2 171 77.8 1
Uu 23 13.5 45 20.4 0.88 (0.17-4.55)3
uu 4 2.3 4 1.8 0.69 (0.38-1.25)
Uu+uu 27 15.8 49 22.2 0.71 (0.40-1.25)
P-trend 0.24
1

Odds ratio;

2

95% confidence interval;

3

adjusted for age, sex, total energy intake, history of colon cancer in a first degree relative, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, current smoking status, and total calcium and alcohol intake.

We investigated the association of the polymorphism with colorectal adenoma risk according to characteristics of adenomatous polyps (Table 3). The inverse association of having at least one ‘u’ allele with risk for colorectal adenoma was more pronounced for adenoma that were multiple (OR, 0.51; 95%CI, 0.21-1.24), larger (OR, 0.37; 95%CI, 0.11-1.28), sessile (OR, 0.36; 95%CI, 0.13-0.97), and perhaps for adenomas with higher levels of dysplasia (OR, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.33-1.41).

Table 3.

Age-, sex-adjusted associations of VDR Tru9I genotypes and risk for incident sporadic colorectal adenomas according to adenoma characteristics, MAP Study, 1994-1997

Adenoma characteristics Tru9I genotypes
UU
Uu+uu
Cases/controls (n) OR1/95%CI2 Cases/controls (n) OR/95%CI
Multiplicity
1 85/171 1.00 20/49 0.88 (0.48-1.60)
>1 59/171 1.00 7/49 0.51 (0.21-1.24)
Shape
Sessile 51/171 1.00 5/49 0.36 (0.13-0.97)
Pedunculated 97/171 1.00 22/49 0.93 (0.51-1.68)
Size (cm)3
<1.0 111/171 1.00 24/49 0.84 (0.47-1.49)
≥1.0 33/171 1.00 3/49 0.37 (0.11-1.28)
Dysplasia4
Mild 73/171 1.00 15/49 0.79 (0.41-1.53)
≥Moderate 71/171 1.00 12/49 0.68 (0.33-1.41)
Morphology5
Tubular 131/171 1.00 27/49 0.80 (0.46-1.38)
Any villous 13/171 1.00 0/49 NA6
1

Odds ratio;

2

95% confidence interval; 3greatest diameter of largest adenoma; 4dysplasia in adenoma with greatest degree of dysplasia; 5if multiple adenomas, classified as “Any villous” if any adenoma villous or tubulovillous; 6not available.

Potential interactions of VDR Tru9I polymorphism and other risk factors for colorectal neoplasms and risk for adenomas are shown in Table 4. Compared to the ‘UU’ genotype carriers, having a ‘u’ allele was inversely associated with risk for colorectal adenoma among those who were younger (OR, 0.60; 95%CI, 0.26-1.37), women (OR, 0.38; 95%CI, 0.17-0.88), did not smoke (OR, 0.39; 95%CI, 0.13-1.23), or took NSAID (OR, 0.38; 95%CI, 0.12-1.25). Dietary calcium and vitamin D intake were observed to be related to decreased risk for adenoma; however, there was no evidence suggesting an interaction with the VDR Tru9I polymorphism.

Table 4.

Multivariate-adjusted1 joint and combined associations of VDR Tru9I genotypes and various risk factors for colorectal neoplasms and risk for incident sporadic colorectal adenomas, MAP study, 1994-1997

UU
Uu+uu
Cases (n) Controls (n) OR2/95%CI3 Cases (n) Controls (n) OR/95%CI
Age (yr)
≤57 58 83 1 12 31 0.60 (0.26-1.37)
>57 86 89 1.41 (0.86-2.31) 15 18 1.09 (0.46-2.56)
Sex
Male 85 60 1 15 16 0.65 (0.28-1.53)
Female 59 112 0.51 (0.30-0.85) 12 33 0.38 (0.17-0.88)
Current smoker
No 35 77 1 6 25 0.39 (0.13-1.23)
Yes 105 94 1.84 (1.07-3.17) 20 24 1.56 (0.69-3.53)
Current drinker
No 63 99 1 13 26 0.96 (0.44-2.08)
Yes 77 71 1.65 (1.01-2.69) 12 22 0.90 (0.39-2.06)
NSAID4 use
No 118 117 1 21 38 0.64 (0.34-1.23)
Yes 23 54 0.48 (0.26-0.86) 5 11 0.38 (0.12-1.25)
Total calcium intake5
Lower 92 84 1 13 23 0.53 (0.23-1.20)
Higher 49 86 0.53 (0.32-0.87) 14 26 0.52 (0.23-1.14)
Total vitamin D intake6
Lower 76 83 1 14 25 0.59 (0.26-1.33)
Higher 65 87 0.78 (0.48-1.27) 13 24 0.60 (0.27-1.38)

1Adjusted for age, sex, total energy intake, history of colon cancer in a first degree relative, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, current smoking status, and total calcium and alcohol intakes; 2odds ratio; 395% confidence interval; 4nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; 5sex-specific median calcium intakes for males 701.3 mg/d, for females 754.1 mg/d; 6sex-specific median vitamin D intakes for males 257.2 IU/d, for females 229.7 IU/d.

DISCUSSION

VDR polymorphisms have been evaluated as risk factors for CRC or adenoma; however, their impact remains unclear. In the present study, we assessed, for the first time, VDR Tru9I variants as risk factor for colorectal adenoma. Our data suggest that the Tru9I mutant ‘u’ allele was associated with decreased risk for colorectal adenoma, particularly for adenomas that were larger, multiple, had moderate or greater dysplasia, or were sessile. Also, the ‘u’ allele was related to decreased risk for adenoma, particularly among persons who were younger, female, NSAID users or did not smoke.

Vitamin D is obtained from the diet or sunlight-induced synthesis, and hydroxylated first in the liver [forming 25-(OH)D], then subsequently in the kidney [forming 1,25-(OH)2D]. The hypothesis that vitamin D may provide reduced colorectal adenoma risk was first proposed in the early 1980s in light of an inverse ecologic association between CRC morbidity and solar exposure[23]. In vivo and in vitro studies found that vitamin D3 promotes differentiation of colon carcinoma cells by inducing E-cadherin and inhibiting β-catenin signaling[7]. Experimental data also suggest that the active metabolite of vitamin D and its analogs can induce apoptosis in a colorectal adenoma cell line[9]. Vitamin D interacts with the VDR, which upregulates CYP3A expression, which in turn increases detoxification of secondary bile acids, including LCA[10]. Recent epidemiological studies have suggested inverse associations among calcium, vitamin D and CRC or adenoma risk; but results are mixed. In the present study, higher calcium and vitamin D intake were associated with lower risk for colorectal adenomas; however, there was no support for the hypothesis that the VDR Tru9I polymorphism may interact with these dietary micronutrients.

VDR is thought to mediate most vitamin D effects, and six common polymorphisms of the VDR gene have been identified. It has been reported that the polymorphisms in the 3’UTR-region (BsmI, TaqI, ApaI, Tru9I and Poly-A) might alter transcriptional activity and mRNA degradation[19]; and FokI, located at the VDR start codon, affects the length of the N-terminal VDR transactivation domain, resulting in a three-amino acid longer protein[24]. Several epidemiological studies have addressed associations between VDR polym-orphisms and different cancer types including colorectal cancers[11-15,25-31]. The FokI polymorphism, which is a potential functional variant, has been extensively studied. Under various exposures, inconsistent results were obtained from different investigators: Wong et al[14], reported, that the mutant ‘f’ allele was associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer; while another study by Ingles et al[13], found that the ‘f’ allele was related to decreased risk; but null associations also have been observed[12,17]. The association of VDR BsmI polymorphism with cancer risk has also been investigated. Two previous studies found that the VDR BsmI ‘BB’ genotype may reduce risk for colorectal adenoma; in one, the association was modified by NSAID use, and in the other, the association was associated with reduced risk among those who had lower calcium intake and used NSAIDs[11,16]. Also, we previously reported that the VDR BsmI variant ‘b’ allele was associated with colorectal adenoma risk in the same study population as the current study[32]. The VDR Poly-A polymorphism has been associated with decreased risk for colorectal adenoma, modified by NSAID use[11]. So far, there have been no previous reports of investigations of an association of the Tru9I polymorphism with any cancer.

Many studies have reported that the VDR polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility for and prognosis of different cancers[13,33,34]. Hutchinson et al[33], found that the VDR ‘ttff’ genotype (according to TaqI and FokI polymorphisms) was significantly associated with thicker malignant melanoma tumors. It has also been reported that the FokI polymorphism was more strongly related to large adenoma risk among subjects with lower dietary calcium intake[13].

Some limitations in this study should be considered in interpreting our results. First, the small sample size and consequent low power preclude drawing strong conclusions. Second, this study is colonoscopy-based, and the population may not be representative of the general population. People who worried about their positive family history were more likely to seek colonoscopy examination, leading to a family history bias that may have attenuated associations. Another potential limitation is that ultraviolet radiation exposure was not assessed in the present study; therefore, the dietary vitamin D intake may not reflect the true exposure to vitamin D. In light of the relationship between vitamin D and calcium, this may also impact the estimated calcium-adenoma association.

In conclusion, this is the first study to investigate an association between the VDR Tru9I polymorphism and risk for incident sporadic colorectal adenoma. Our data suggest that the VDR Tru9I polymorphism may be more related to progression than initiation of colorectal adenoma. Our study also focused on the interaction between the VDR gene polymorphism, Tru9I, and dietary calcium and vitamin D intakes; however, no such interaction was found. On the other hand, our data suggest possible interactions of VDR Tru9I genotypes with age, sex, smoking, drinking, and NSAID use. Further, larger studies are needed to verify the present data, to understand the biological mechanisms of VDR gene/calcium/vitamin D interactions.

Footnotes

Supported by the Public Health Service grants, No. R01CA-51932 to RMB (National Cancer Institute), and Center for Colon Cancer Research grant, No. RR017698 to FGB from National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services

Co-first-authors: You-Ling Gong and Da-Wen Xie

Science Editor Wang XL and Guo SY Language Editor Elsevier HK

References

  • 1.Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, Ghafoor A, Samuels A, Ward E, Feuer EJ, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54:8–29. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.54.1.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Garland CF, Garland FC, Gorham ED. Can colon cancer incidence and death rates be reduced with calcium and vitamin D? Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;54:193S–201S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/54.1.193S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Platz EA, Hankinson SE, Hollis BW, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Speizer FE, Giovannucci E. Plasma 1,25-dihydroxy- and 25-hydroxyvitamin D and adenomatous polyps of the distal colorectum. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000;9:1059–1065. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Garland CF, Comstock GW, Garland FC, Helsing KJ, Shaw EK, Gorham ED. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and colon cancer: eight-year prospective study. Lancet. 1989;2:1176–1178. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91789-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Braun MM, Helzlsouer KJ, Hollis BW, Comstock GW. Colon cancer and serum vitamin D metabolite levels 10-17 years prior to diagnosis. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:608–611. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pence BC, Buddingh F. Inhibition of dietary fat-promoted colon carcinogenesis in rats by supplemental calcium or vitamin D3. Carcinogenesis. 1988;9:187–190. doi: 10.1093/carcin/9.1.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pálmer HG, González-Sancho JM, Espada J, Berciano MT, Puig I, Baulida J, Quintanilla M, Cano A, de Herreros AG, Lafarga M, et al. Vitamin D(3) promotes the differentiation of colon carcinoma cells by the induction of E-cadherin and the inhibition of beta-catenin signaling. J Cell Biol. 2001;154:369–387. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200102028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sadava D, Remer T, Petersen K. Hyperplasia, hyperproliferation and decreased migration rate of colonic epithelial cells in mice fed a diet deficient in vitamin D. Biol Cell. 1996;87:113–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Díaz GD, Paraskeva C, Thomas MG, Binderup L, Hague A. Apoptosis is induced by the active metabolite of vitamin D3 and its analogue EB1089 in colorectal adenoma and carcinoma cells: possible implications for prevention and therapy. Cancer Res. 2000;60:2304–2312. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Makishima M, Lu TT, Xie W, Whitfield GK, Domoto H, Evans RM, Haussler MR, Mangelsdorf DJ. Vitamin D receptor as an intestinal bile acid sensor. Science. 2002;296:1313–1316. doi: 10.1126/science.1070477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Peters U, Hayes RB, Chatterjee N, Shao W, Schoen RE, Pinsky P, Hollis BW, McGlynn KA. Circulating vitamin D metabolites, polymorphism in vitamin D receptor, and colorectal adenoma risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:546–552. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grau MV, Baron JA, Sandler RS, Haile RW, Beach ML, Church TR, Heber D. Vitamin D, calcium supplementation, and colorectal adenomas: results of a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1765–1771. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ingles SA, Wang J, Coetzee GA, Lee ER, Frankl HD, Haile RW. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and risk of colorectal adenomas (United States) Cancer Causes Control. 2001;12:607–614. doi: 10.1023/a:1011292002475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wong HL, Seow A, Arakawa K, Lee HP, Yu MC, Ingles SA. Vitamin D receptor start codon polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk: effect modification by dietary calcium and fat in Singapore Chinese. Carcinogenesis. 2003;24:1091–1095. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgg059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Speer G, Cseh K, Fuszek P, Dworak O, Vargha P, Takács I, Nagy Z, Lakatos P. The role of estrogen receptor, vitamin D receptor and calcium receptor genotypes in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. Orv Hetil. 2001;142:947–951. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim HS, Newcomb PA, Ulrich CM, Keener CL, Bigler J, Farin FM, Bostick RM, Potter JD. Vitamin D receptor polymorphism and the risk of colorectal adenomas: evidence of interaction with dietary vitamin D and calcium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:869–874. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Peters U, McGlynn KA, Chatterjee N, Gunter E, Garcia-Closas M, Rothman N, Sinha R. Vitamin D, calcium, and vitamin D receptor polymorphism in colorectal adenomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;10:1267–1274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ye WZ, Reis AF, Velho G. Identification of a novel Tru9 I polymorphism in the human vitamin D receptor gene. J Hum Genet. 2000;45:56–57. doi: 10.1007/s100380050011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Beelman CA, Parker R. Degradation of mRNA in eukaryotes. Cell. 1995;81:179–183. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90326-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Györffy B, Vásárhelyi B, Krikovszky D, Madácsy L, Tordai A, Tulassay T, Szabó A. Gender-specific association of vitamin D receptor polymorphism combinations with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;147:803–808. doi: 10.1530/eje.0.1470803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lewis RC, Bostick RM, Xie D, Deng Z, Wargovich MJ, Fina MF, Roufail WM, Geisinger KR. Polymorphism of the cyclin D1 gene, CCND1, and risk for incident sporadic colorectal adenomas. Cancer Res. 2003;63:8549–8553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.O'Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Diaz B, Dickersin GR, Ewing S, Geller S, Kasimian D. The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology. 1990;98:371–379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Garland C, Shekelle RB, Barrett-Connor E, Criqui MH, Rossof AH, Paul O. Dietary vitamin D and calcium and risk of colorectal cancer: a 19-year prospective study in men. Lancet. 1985;1:307–309. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91082-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gross C, Eccleshall TR, Malloy PJ, Villa ML, Marcus R, Feldman D. The presence of a polymorphism at the translation initiation site of the vitamin D receptor gene is associated with low bone mineral density in postmenopausal Mexican-American women. J Bone Miner Res. 1996;11:1850–1855. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650111204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tayeb MT, Clark C, Haites NE, Sharp L, Murray GI, McLeod HL. Vitamin D receptor, HER-2 polymorphisms and risk of prostate cancer in men with benign prostate hyperplasia. Saudi Med J. 2004;25:447–451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cheteri MB, Stanford JL, Friedrichsen DM, Peters MA, Iwasaki L, Langlois MC, Feng Z, Ostrander EA. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk. Prostate. 2004;59:409–418. doi: 10.1002/pros.20001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Huang SP, Chou YH, Wayne Chang WS, Wu MT, Chen YY, Yu CC, Wu TT, Lee YH, Huang JK, Wu WJ, et al. Association between vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk in a Taiwanese population. Cancer Lett. 2004;207:69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2003.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ruza E, Sotillo E, Sierrasesúmaga L, Azcona C, Patiño-García A. Analysis of polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor, estrogen receptor, and collagen Ialpha1 genes and their relationship with height in children with bone cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003;25:780–786. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200310000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guy M, Lowe LC, Bretherton-Watt D, Mansi JL, Colston KW. Approaches to evaluating the association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with breast cancer risk. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2003;164:43–54. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55580-0_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schöndorf T, Eisberg C, Wassmer G, Warm M, Becker M, Rein DT, Göhring UJ. Association of the vitamin D receptor genotype with bone metastases in breast cancer patients. Oncology. 2003;64:154–159. doi: 10.1159/000067767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ikuyama T, Hamasaki T, Inatomi H, Katoh T, Muratani T, Matsumoto T. Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism with renal cell carcinoma in Japanese. Endocr J. 2002;49:433–438. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.49.433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Boyapati SM, Bostick RM, McGlynn KA, Fina MF, Roufail WM, Geisinger KR, Wargovich M, Coker A, Hebert JR. Calcium, vitamin D, and risk for colorectal adenoma: dependency on vitamin D receptor BsmI polymorphism and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:631–637. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hutchinson PE, Osborne JE, Lear JT, Smith AG, Bowers PW, Morris PN, Jones PW, York C, Strange RC, Fryer AA. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms are associated with altered prognosis in patients with malignant melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:498–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xu Y, Shibata A, McNeal JE, Stamey TA, Feldman D, Peehl DM. Vitamin D receptor start codon polymorphism (FokI) and prostate cancer progression. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:23–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Gastroenterology : WJG are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

RESOURCES