Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2015 Apr 16;53(5):1731–1735. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03094-14

Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry Meropenem Hydrolysis Assay with NH4HCO3, a Reliable Tool for Direct Detection of Carbapenemase Activity

Costas C Papagiannitsis a,e,, Vendula Študentová a, Radoslaw Izdebski b, Olga Oikonomou c, Yvonne Pfeifer d, Efthimia Petinaki c, Jaroslav Hrabák a,e
Editor: C-A D Burnham
PMCID: PMC4400744  PMID: 25694522

Abstract

A comparison of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometric (MALDI-TOF MS) meropenem hydrolysis assay with the Carba NP test showed that both methods exhibited low sensitivity (approximately 76%), mainly due to the false-negative results obtained with OXA-48-type producers. The addition of NH4HCO3 to the reaction buffer for the MALDI-TOF MS assay dramatically improved its sensitivity (98%). Automatic interpretation of the MALDI-TOF MS assay, using the MBT STAR-BL software, generally agreed with the results obtained after manual analysis. For the Carba NP test, spectrophotometric analysis found six additional carbapenemase producers.

TEXT

Nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas spp. are now emerging worldwide and are difficult to treat (1). Previous data have shown that strict epidemiological intervention based on the rapid detection of carbapenemase production can prevent the spread of those bacteria (2). Therefore, the introduction of rapid and sensitive methodologies for the detection of carbapenemase-producing bacteria is of utmost importance. Recently, two new highly sensitive and rapid methods for the direct detection of carbapenemase activity were developed. In 2011, two research groups demonstrated that matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) can detect carbapenemase activity, based on mass spectral profiles obtained from carbapenem molecules (3, 4). The second method, the Carba NP test, is a biochemical method used in the detection of carbapenemase activity in Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp., and Acinetobacter species (57). This test is based on a decrease in pH resulting from the hydrolysis of the β-lactam ring of carbapenem molecules, which is detected using phenol red as a pH indicator.

The aim of this study was to validate the efficiency of a MALDI-TOF MS meropenem hydrolysis assay and the Carba NP test for the detection of carbapenemase producers. The performances of both methods were compared with that of a recently published modification of the MALDI-TOF MS assay (MALDI-TOF BIC) in an effort to increase the reliability of detecting OXA-48 producers (8). Furthermore, the automatic interpretation of all methods was evaluated.

The methods were tested against a group of 124 Enterobacteriaceae and 37 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from collections of the Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Plzen (Czech Republic), the National Medicines Institute in Warsaw (Poland), the Robert Koch Institute in Wernigerode (Germany), and the University Hospital in Larissa (Greece). The isolates were previously characterized, as described below. All isolates were tested for extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC expression by the ESBL double-disk synergy test (DDST) with cefotaxime, ceftazidime, aztreonam, and amoxicillin-clavulanate disks in the absence and presence of cloxacillin (250 μg/ml) (9). Susceptibility to carbapenems was determined by using imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem disks and interpreting them according to the EUCAST criteria (http://www.eucast.org/). All isolates that were nonsusceptible to at least one carbapenem were subjected to metallo-β-lactamase (MβL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), and OXA-48 phenotypic detection using DDST with EDTA (10), the combined disk test with phenylboronic acid (11), and a temocillin disk (12), respectively. PCR detection of various bla genes was performed by the use of specific primers for blaSHV-, blaCTX-M-, blaCMY-, blaKPC-, blaVIM-, blaIMP-, blaNDM-, and blaOXA-48-like genes, as reported previously (1320). The PCR products were purified and sequenced on both strands, as described previously (21). The MICs of ceftazidime and meropenem were determined by the broth dilution method (22). The group included 113 isolates producing KPC- (n = 21), VIM- (n = 44), NDM- (n = 24), IMP- (n = 4), and OXA-48-type (n = 19) carbapenemases and one isolate coproducing VIM and IMP metallo-β-lactamases (2329). The remaining 48 isolates were non-carbapenemase producers (Table 1) (21, 30).

TABLE 1.

Results of the MALDI-TOF MS assays and Carba NP testa

Resistance mechanism Bacterial species No. of isolates Reference/source MIC range (μg/ml) for:
No. of carbapenemase producers detected usingb:
Ceftazidime Meropenem MALDI-TOF assay Carba NP test MALDI-TOF BIC assay
KPC K. pneumoniae 20 23, this study 32 to >32 8 to >16 20 (20) 20 (20) 19 (19)
E. cloacae 1 This study >32 >16 1 (1) 1 (1) 1 (1)
VIM K. pneumoniae 6 23, this study 32 to >32 1 to >16 6 (6) 6 (6) 6 (6)
E. cloacae 7 This study 24 to >32 1 to >16 7 (7) 7 (7) 7 (7)
Serratia marcescens 2 This study 4 to 8 >16 2 (2) 2 (2) 2 (2)
Klebsiella oxytoca 1 This study >32 0.25 1 (1) 1 (1) 1 (1)
Citrobacter freundii 1 This study 16 2 1 (1) 1 (1) 1 (1)
L. adecarboxylata 1 24 >32 4 1 (1) 1 (1) 1 (1)
P. aeruginosa 26 25, 26 16 to >32 4 to >16 16 24 (26) 25
NDM K. pneumoniae 4 27 >32 4 to 16 4 (4) 4 (4) 4 (4)
E. cloacae 10 27, 28 >32 0.5 to 16 10 (10) 6 (8) 10 (10)
E. coli 10 27 >32 1 to >16 10 (9) 8 (9) 10 (9)
IMP S. marcescens 1 This study >32 >16 1 (0) 1 (1) 1 (0)
P. aeruginosa 3 25 >32 >16 3 2 (3) 3
VIM + IMP P. aeruginosa 1 25 32 >16 1 1 (1) 1
OXA-48-like K. pneumoniae 11 29, this study 0.5 to >32 0.5 to >16 1 (1) 1 (1) 11 (11)
E. cloacae 1 29 >32 8 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1)
E. coli 6 29, this study 0.5 to 32 0.5 to >16 1 (1) 0 (0) 6 (6)
Raoultella ornithinolytica 1 29 >32 4 1 (1) 0 (0) 1 (1)
Total carbapenemase producers Enterobacteriaceae 83 67 (65) 59 (62) 82 (80)
P. aeruginosa 30 20 27 (30) 29
CTX-M K. pneumoniae 3 This study >32 4 to 8 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
E. coli 15 21 1 to >32 ≤0.125 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
SHV K. pneumoniae 7 This study 16 to >32 0.125 to 16 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
CTX-M + SHV K. pneumoniae 10 This study 16 to >32 0.125 to >16 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
CTX-M + CMY E. coli 1 21 16 ≤0.125 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
DHA K. pneumoniae 5 30 8 to >32 0.5 to >16 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Nonec P. aeruginosa 7 25, 26 4 to >32 8 to >16 0 0 (0) 0
Total non-carbapenemase producers Enterobacteriaceae 41 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
P. aeruginosa 7 0 0 (0) 0
a

Rows representing the total number of isolates per category are in bold.

b

Numbers refer to the number of carbapenemase producers that were correctly detected by each method, while the numbers in parentheses mention the carbapenemase producers that were correctly identified by automatic interpretation of the MALDI-TOF MS assay, Carba NP test, and MALDI-TOF BIC assay. Automatic interpretation was not applied to the spectra of P. aeruginosa isolates.

c

Negative by PCR analysis for blaSHV-, blaCTX-M-, blaCMY-, blaKPC-, blaVIM-, blaIMP-, blaNDM-, and blaOXA-48-like genes.

The MALDI-TOF MS meropenem hydrolysis assay was performed as previously described (31). For the measurement, 1 μl of the sample was applied on a stainless steel MALDI target plate (MSP 96 target; Bruker Daltonics) and allowed to dry. Each sample was overlaid with 1 μl of matrix solution (10 mg/ml 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid and 0.1 μM reserpine diluted in 50% ethanol). After air drying, spectra were measured within the m/z range 350 to 700 using a microflex LT mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics). The analysis of the spectra was performed using the flexAnalysis 3.0 software, based on the interpretation criteria shown in Table 2. The Carba NP test was carried out on strains cultured on Columbia blood agar plates (bioMérieux), as described by Dortet et al. (32). The results of all methods tested were interpreted by three independent technicians who were unaware of the identities of the isolates.

TABLE 2.

Criteria used for manual interpretation of both MALDI-TOF MS assays

Strain type Peak at m/z ofa:
358.5 380.5 384.5 406.5
Carbapenemase producerb Present Present Absent Absent
Non-carbapenemase producerc Absent Absent Present Present
a

358.5-m/z peak, decarboxylated product of meropenem; 380.5-m/z peak, sodium salt of the decarboxylated product of meropenem; 384.5-m/z peak, meropenem; 406.5-m/z peak, sodium salt of meropenem. A peak was interpreted as noise if its intensity was not five times higher than the intensity of the background peaks.

b

An isolate was interpreted as a carbapenemase producer if the presence of at least one of the decarboxylated products of meropenem was detected.

c

An isolate was interpreted as a non-carbapenemase producer if the absence of both decarboxylated products of meropenem and the presence of meropenem and/or its sodium salt were observed.

The results are summarized in Tables 1 and 3. False-positive results were not observed among non-carbapenemase producers with either the MALDI-TOF MS assay or the Carba NP test. Also, both methods performed well against the 21 KPC producers and the isolate coproducing VIM and IMP carbapenemases. The MALDI-TOF MS assay correctly detected all NDM and IMP producers but failed to detect a carbapenemase in 10 VIM-producing P. aeruginosa isolates. The false-negative results found with P. aeruginosa can be explained by the presence of numerous background peaks of significant amplitude (>20% amplitude of the target peaks; Table 2), precluding a definitive analysis of the spectra. On the other hand, the Carba NP test failed to detect three P. aeruginosa isolates expressing either VIM (n = 2) or IMP (n = 1) and six NDM-producing isolates of Enterobacter cloacae (n = 4) and Escherichia coli (n = 2). Of note, both methods experienced significant problems with the subset of the 19 isolates producing OXA-48-type β-lactamases, which are enzymes with weak carbapenemase activity. The MALDI-TOF MS assay correctly detected three out of the 19 (19%) OXA-48-type producers, while the Carba NP test detected the production of a carbapenemase in only one of these isolates (6%). However, an attempt to increase the enzyme quantity in the revealing solution (7) by using the double bacterial inoculum had no impact on the performance of Carba NP test.

TABLE 3.

Diagnostic values of the MALDI-TOF MS assays and Carba NP test for the detection of carbapenemase-producing isolatesa

Method No. of results
Sensitivity Specificity
TP TN FP FN
MALDI-TOF assay 87 (65) 48 (41) 0 (0) 26 (18) 77% (78%) 100% (100%)
Carba NP test 86 (92) 48 (48) 0 (0) 27 (21) 76% (81%) 100% (100%)
MALDI-TOF BIC assay 111 (80) 48 (41) 0 (0) 2 (3) 98% (96%) 100% (100%)
a

TP, true positive; TN, true negative; FP, false positive; FN, false negative. The numbers in parentheses refer to the diagnostic values for the automatic interpretation for each method. Automatic interpretation was not applied to the spectra of P. aeruginosa isolates.

The MALDI-TOF BIC assay differed from the original assay only in that the reaction buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.01% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.1 mM meropenem) was supplemented with 50 mM NH4HCO3 (pH was adjusted to 7.0). Validation of the MALDI-TOF BIC assay indicated that the addition of NH4HCO3 did not have an impact on the specificity (100%) of the assay, while it dramatically improved its sensitivity (98%). One hundred eleven carbapenemase producers, including all NDM-, IMP-, OXA-48-type-producing isolates and the isolate coproducing VIM and IMP carbapenemases, were correctly detected by the modified assay (Table 1). The MALDI-TOF BIC assay missed one KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolate and one P. aeruginosa isolate expressing VIM metallo-β-lactamase. The failure of the MALDI-TOF BIC assay to detect these two isolates might be explained by low expression of carbapenemase enzymes in the respective isolates or by the inhibitory effects of NH4HCO3. However, the inhibitory effects should be further examined, since we are unaware of the side effects of NH4HCO3. The addition of NH4HCO3 to the Carba NP test was not tested, since it might be problematic due to the alkalization of the reaction buffer (31).

Automatic interpretation of results is important for the standardization of a diagnostic process. For Enterobacteriaceae, raw spectra that were acquired with the MALDI-TOF MS and MALDI-TOF BIC assays were automatically analyzed using the MBT STAR-BL prototype software (Bruker Daltonics). The intensity ratio of the hydrolyzed to intact meropenem signals indicates the level of carbapenemase activity. The MBT STAR-BL prototype software calculated the summed hydrolyzed and intact meropenem intensities, as well as the corresponding ratio (logRQ value). The results were normalized to the signal intensities obtained from positive- and negative-control strains and displayed as a plot (Fig. 1), which was evaluated by the unaided eye. The automatic interpretation was generally in accordance with the results obtained after manual analysis (Table 1). Discrepancies were observed only for the same two carbapenemase-producing isolates, which were positive by manual reading of both assays but interpreted as negative by the software. The failure of the software to detect the two carbapenemase-producing isolates might be explained by the fact that both of them exhibited significantly low intensity ratios. Intensity values, which are arbitrary units, may be affected by several variables, resulting in a significant influence on the intensity ratios. Automatic analysis was not applied on P. aeruginosa isolates due to the lower quality of their spectra.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Image obtained after automatic interpretation of spectra by using MBT STAR-BL prototype software. The isolates with normalized logRQ values above the threshold line were interpreted as positive for carbapenemase production, while isolates with normalized logRQ values below the threshold line were interpreted as negative. Under our experimental conditions, the best sensitivity and specificity values were obtained by setting up the threshold line to 0.5.

Furthermore, an automatic reading of Carba NP test was attempted by using a PR 3100 TSC enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reader (Bio-Rad). The absorbances of the samples were compared with those of the negative controls. Each sample had its own negative control. The samples with lower absorbances were read as positive, while samples with absorbances that were higher or equal to those of the negative controls were read as negative. The use of an ELISA reader found six additional carbapenemase producers, interpreted by the technicians as being non-carbapenemase producers (Table 1), and increased the sensitivity of the method to 81%. This finding underlined that the manual interpretation of Carba NP test was inaccurate, especially for samples in which the color change could not be detected by the unaided eye.

In conclusion, the MALDI-TOF MS assay and Carba NP test performed well, exhibiting excellent specificity (100%). Measuring the Carba NP test by an ELISA reader is important for archiving primary data, which is a legal requirement in most European countries. Additionally, the use of an ELISA reader increased the sensitivity of Carba NP test, indicating that automatic reading may help with subjectivity in the interpretation, especially for doubtful results. However, the Carba NP test displayed a lower sensitivity than was initially reported (76% in this study versus 100%) (5, 6), mainly due to false-negative results obtained with OXA-48-type producers. This finding is in agreement with previous studies reporting the limited ability of Carba NP test to detect OXA-48-type-producing isolates and some weak carbapenemases of class A, like GES-5 and SME-1 (33, 34). For the MALDI-TOF MS assay, the limitation in detecting OXA-48-type producers was overtaken by addition of NH4HCO3 to the reaction buffer. The MALDI-TOF BIC assay correctly detected 98% of the carbapenemase producers, demonstrating this method to be a reliable tool for detecting carbapenemase activity. Furthermore, the results from the automatic interpretation of both MALDI-TOF MS assays suggested that the use of the MBT STAR-BL prototype software can be helpful for nonexperienced users facing difficulties with spectrum analysis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Markus Kostrzewa and Christoph Lange (Bruker Daltonics) for providing the MBT STAR-BL prototype software and helpful comments on the interpretation of the results. Also, we thank John D. Perry and Marek Gniadkowski for providing some of the carbapenemase-producing strains used in this study.

This work was supported by the research project grants from the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (grant NT11032-6/2010).

We declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hrabák J, Chudáčková E, Papagiannitsis CC. 2014. Detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae: a challenge for diagnostic microbiological laboratories. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:839–853. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schwaber MJ, Carmeli Y. 2014. An ongoing national intervention to contain the spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Infect Dis 58:697–703. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hrabák J, Walková R, Studentová V, Chudácková E, Bergerová T. 2011. Carbapenemase activity detection by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol 49:3222–3227. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00984-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Burckhardt I, Zimmermann S. 2011. Using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry to detect carbapenem resistance within 1 to 2.5 hours. J Clin Microbiol 49:3321–3324. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00287-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nordmann P, Poirel L, Dortet L. 2012. Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis 18:1503–1507. doi: 10.3201/eid1809.120355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dortet L, Poirel L, Nordmann P. 2012. Rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas spp. J Clin Microbiol 50:3773–3776. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01597-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dortet L, Poirel L, Errera C, Nordmann P. 2014. CarbAcineto NP test for rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter spp. J Clin Microbiol 52:2359–2364. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00594-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Studentova V, Papagiannitsis CC, Izdebski R, Pfeifer Y, Chudackova E, Bergerova T, Gniadkowski M, Hrabak J. 2014. Detection of OXA-48-type carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in diagnostic laboratories can be enhanced by addition of bicarbonates to cultivation media or reaction buffers. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 60:119–129. doi: 10.1007/s12223-014-0349-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Drieux L, Brossier F, Sougakoff W, Jarlier V. 2008. Phenotypic detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in Enterobacteriaceae: review and bench guide. Clin Microbiol Infect 14(Suppl 1):S90–S103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lee K, Lim YS, Yong D, Yum JH, Chong Y. 2003. Evaluation of the Hodge test and the imipenem-EDTA double-disk synergy test for differentiating metallo-β-lactamase-producing isolates of Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. J Clin Microbiol 41:4623–4629. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4623-4629.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Doi Y, Potoski BA, Adams-Haduch JM, Sidjabat HE, Pasculle AW, Paterson DL. 2008. Simple disk-based method for detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-type β-lactamase by use of a boronic acid compound. J Clin Microbiol 46:4083–4086. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01408-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Glupczynski Y, Huang TD, Bouchahrouf W, Rezende de Castro R, Bauraing C, Gerard M, Verbruggen AM, Delpano A, Denis O, Bogaerts P. 2012. Rapid emergence and spread of OXA-48-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates in Belgian hospitals. Int J Antimicrob Agents 39:168–172. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gniadkowski M, Schneider I, Jungwirth R, Hryniewicz W, Bauernfeind A. 1998. Ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates from three Polish hospitals: identification of three novel TEM- and SHV-5-type extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:514–520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Woodford N, Fagan EJ, Ellington MJ. 2006. Multiplex PCR for rapid detection of genes encoding CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamases. J Antimicrob Chemother 57:154–155. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.D'Andrea MM, Literacka E, Zioga A, Giani T, Baraniak A, Fiett J, Sadowy E, Tassios PT, Rossolini GM, Gniadkowski M, Miriagou V. 2011. Evolution and spread of a multidrug-resistant Proteus mirabilis with chromosomal AmpC-type cephalosporinase in Europe. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:2735–2742. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01736-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baraniak A, Grabowska A, Izdebski R, Fiett J, Herda M, Bojarska K, Zabicka D, Kania-Pudlo M, Mlynarczyk G, Zak-Pulawska Z, Hryniewicz W, Gniadkowski M, KPC-PL Study Group. 2011. Molecular characteristics of KPC-producing Enterobacteriaceae at the early stage of their dissemination in Poland, 2008–2009. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5493–5499. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05118-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ellington MJ, Kistler J, Livermore DM, Woodford N. 2007. Multiplex PCR for rapid detection of genes encoding acquired metallo-β-lactamases. J Antimicrob Chemother 59:321–322. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fiett J, Baraniak A, Mrowka A, Fleischer M, Drulis-Kawa Z, Naumiuk L, Samet A, Hryniewicz W, Gniadkowski M. 2006. Molecular epidemiology of acquired-metallo-β-lactamase-producing bacteria in Poland. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:880–886. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.3.880-886.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yong D, Toleman MA, Giske CG, Cho HS, Sundman K, Lee K, Walsh TR. 2009. Characterization of a new metallo-β-lactamase gene, blaNDM-1, and a novel erythromycin esterase gene carried on a unique genetic structure in Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 14 from India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:5046–5054. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00774-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Poirel L, Heritier C, Tolun V, Nordmann P. 2004. Emergence of oxacillinase-mediated resistance to imipenem in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:15–22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.1.15-22.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Papagiannitsis CC, Študentová V, Jakubů V, Španĕlová P, Urbášková P, Žemličková H, Hrabák J. 2014. High prevalence of ST131 among CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli from community-acquired infections, in the Czech Republic. Microb Drug Resist 21:74–84. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2014.0070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 2003. Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibacterial agents by broth dilution. Clin Microbiol Infect 9:ix–xv. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00790.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hrabák J, Papagiannitsis CC, Študentová V, Jakubu V, Fridrichová M, Žemličková H, Czech Participants of European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network. 2013. Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in the Czech Republic in 2011. Euro Surveill 18:pii=20626 http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20626. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Papagiannitsis CC, Študentová V, Hrabák J, Kubele J, Jindrák V, Žemličková H. 2013. Isolation from a nonclinical sample of Leclercia adecarboxylata producing a VIM-1 metallo-β-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:2896–2897. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00052-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Papagiannitsis CC, Študentová V, Ruzicka F, Tejkalova R, Hrabák J. 2013. Molecular characterization of metallo-β-lactamase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Czech hospital (2009–2011). J Med Microbiol 62:945–947. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.056119-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liakopoulos A, Mavroidi A, Katsifas EA, Theodosiou A, Karagouni AD, Miriagou V, Petinaki E. 2013. Carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa from central Greece: molecular epidemiology and genetic analysis of class I integrons. BMC Infect Dis 13:505. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Perry JD, Naqvi SH, Mizra IA, Alizai SA, Hussain A, Ghirardi S, Orenga S, Wilkinson K, Woodford N, Zhang J, Livermore DM, Abbasi SA, Raza MW. 2011. Prevalence of faecal carriage of Enterobacteriaceae with NDM-1 carbapenemase at military hospitals in Pakistan, and evaluation of two chromogenic media. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:2288–2294. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Papagiannitsis CC, Studentova V, Chudackova E, Bergerova T, Hrabak J, Radej J, Novak I. 2013. Identification of a New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-4 (NDM-4)-producing Enterobacter cloacae from a Czech patient previously hospitalized in Sri Lanka. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 58:547–549. doi: 10.1007/s12223-013-0247-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pfeifer Y, Schlatterer K, Engelmann E, Schiller RA, Frangenberg HR, Stiewe D, Holfelder M, Witte W, Nordmann P, Poirel L. 2012. Emergence of OXA-48-type carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in German hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:2125–2128. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05315-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chudáčková E, Bergerová T, Fajfrlik K, Cervená D, Urbásková P, Empel J, Gniadkowski M, Hrabák J. 2010. Carbapenem-nonsusceptible strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing SHV-5 and/or DHA-1 β-lactamases in a Czech hospital. FEMS Microbiol Lett 309:62–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02016.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hrabák J, Študentová V, Walková R, Žemličková H, Jakubu V, Chudácková E, Gniadkowski M, Pfeifer Y, Perry JD, Wilkinson K, Bergerová T. 2012. Detection of NDM-1, VIM-1, KPC, OXA-48, and OXA-162 carbapenemases by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol 50:2441–2443. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01002-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dortet L, Bréchard L, Poirel L, Nordmann P. 2014. Impact of the isolation medium for detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae using an updated version of the Carba NP test. J Med Microbiol 63:772–776. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.071340-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tijet N, Boyd D, Patel SN, Mulvey MR, Melano RG. 2013. Evaluation of the Carba NP test for rapid detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:4578–4580. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00878-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Knox J, Jadhav S, Sevior D, Agyekum A, Whipp M, Waring L, Iredell J, Palombo E. 2014. Phenotypic detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae using MALDI-TOF MS and the Carba NP test. J Clin Microbiol 52:4075–4077. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02121-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES