Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2015 Apr 16;53(5):1672–1676. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00549-15

Multicenter Evaluation of Candida QuickFISH BC for Identification of Candida Species Directly from Blood Culture Bottles

Ayman M Abdelhamed a, Sean X Zhang b, Tonya Watkins b, Margie A Morgan c, Fann Wu d, Rebecca J Buckner e, DeAnna D Fuller e, Thomas E Davis e, Hossein Salimnia f, Marilynn R Fairfax f, Paul R Lephart f, Melinda D Poulter g, Sarah B Regi g, Michael R Jacobs a,
Editor: A J McAdam
PMCID: PMC4400752  PMID: 25762766

Abstract

Candida species are common causes of bloodstream infections (BSI), with high mortality. Four species cause >90% of Candida BSI: C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis. Differentiation of Candida spp. is important because of differences in virulence and antimicrobial susceptibility. Candida QuickFISH BC, a multicolor, qualitative nucleic acid hybridization assay for the identification of C. albicans (green fluorescence), C. glabrata (red fluorescence), and C. parapsilosis (yellow fluorescence), was tested on Bactec and BacT/Alert blood culture bottles which signaled positive on automated blood culture devices and were positive for yeast by Gram stain at seven study sites. The results were compared to conventional identification. A total of 419 yeast-positive blood culture bottles were studied, consisting of 258 clinical samples (89 C. glabrata, 79 C. albicans, 23 C. parapsilosis, 18 C. tropicalis, and 49 other species) and 161 contrived samples inoculated with clinical isolates (40 C. glabrata, 46 C. albicans, 36 C. parapsilosis, 19 C. tropicalis, and 20 other species). A total of 415 samples contained a single fungal species, with C. glabrata (n = 129; 30.8%) being the most common isolate, followed by C. albicans (n = 125; 29.8%), C. parapsilosis (n = 59; 14.1%), C. tropicalis (n = 37; 8.8%), and C. krusei (n = 17; 4.1%). The overall agreement (with range for the three major Candida species) between the two methods was 99.3% (98.3 to 100%), with a sensitivity of 99.7% (98.3 to 100%) and a specificity of 98.0% (99.4 to 100%). This study showed that Candida QuickFISH BC is a rapid and accurate method for identifying C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis, the three most common Candida species causing BSI, directly from blood culture bottles.

INTRODUCTION

Candida species are ranked as the third or fourth most common etiologic agents associated with nosocomial bloodstream infections (1, 2). Mortality rates are estimated to be as high as 45% (3, 4), due in part to slow diagnostic methods and to inappropriate initial antifungal treatment (5, 6). Candida albicans and other yeasts reside as commensals of the skin and mucous membranes of the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts, causing infection when the host becomes debilitated or immunocompromised. Risk factors for invasive candidiasis include central venous catheters, parenteral nutrition, organ transplantation, hemodialysis, surgery, burns, long-term stay in an intensive care unit, and previous administration of broad spectrum antimicrobial and immunosuppressive agents (7, 8).

The most common Candida species found in healthy individuals include C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis (9). These species cause more than 90% of invasive infections (10). However, the prevalence of these different Candida species varies widely geographically, and their antifungal susceptibilities are species specific (11). Consequently, rapid, accurate identification of the causative Candida species is critical for successful treatment.

Currently, blood culture is the gold standard method for the diagnosis of fungal bloodstream infection (12). When growth is detected, blood culture medium is drawn for Gram stain and subculture on agar plates for subsequent phenotypic identification (13), which typically takes at least 72 h (14). To overcome this relatively long turnaround time of identification, several molecular methods have been evaluated for identification of yeasts directly from blood culture bottles such as real-time PCR, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry, and peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA-FISH) (15, 16). A method to detect Candida directly from patient's blood specimens within 3 h has also been developed (17, 18).

The first generation of yeast PNA-FISH (AdvanDx, Woburn, MA) distinguishes between the five commonest Candida species directly from positive blood cultures within 90 min. The method uses fluorescence-labeled probes to complement species-specific rRNA sequences: C. albicans and C. parapsilosis fluoresce green, C. tropicalis fluoresces yellow, and C. glabrata and C. krusei fluoresce red. The assay cannot distinguish between C. albicans and C. parapsilosis or between C. glabrata and C. krusei (15). A second-generation yeast PNA-FISH, PNA Candida QuickFISH BC (AdvanDx), is faster (30 min) and able to differentiate between the most common Candida spp.: C. albicans fluoresces green, C. glabrata fluoresces red, and C. parapsilosis fluoresces yellow, while other yeasts do not produce any fluorescence.

The C. albicans probe is species specific and does not react with C. dubliniensis. Similarly, the C. parapsilosis probe does not react with C. orthopsilosis or C. metapsilosis. However, the C. glabrata probe does react with C. bracarensis and C. nivariensis (16).

In the present study, we used a prototype lot of PNA Candida QuickFISH BC (AdvanDx). Candida QuickFISH BC is a FISH method using peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probes designed to detect specific rRNA sequences of yeast species on microscope slides from positive blood culture bottles. Fluorophore-labeled PNA probes that target unique rRNA sequences and quencher probes that target unbound PNA probes are added to smears and hybridized at 55°C for 15 min. PNA probes that do not bind to target rRNA sequences will bind to a quencher probe to form a nonfluorescent probe-quencher complex. Routinely, bloodstream infections caused by yeast are presumptively identified by Gram stain from positive blood cultures, with final identification and differentiation requiring subculture and biochemical analysis, which can take several days. We used Candida QuickFISH BC to identify Candida species directly from positive blood culture bottles in a multicenter study at seven institutions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples from clinical and contrived blood culture bottles were tested at seven study sites with a prototype lot of Candida QuickFISH BC. Clinical samples were obtained from routine blood cultures at all seven study sites. Testing was performed on bottles that signaled positive on automated blood culture devices and showed yeast by Gram stain within 48 h of bottles signaling positive. Contrived samples were produced at five study sites using simulated blood cultures, with aliquots of blood broth medium (using 10 ml of blood per bottle) inoculated with fresh subcultures of clinical isolates. These were incubated with shaking at 35 to 37°C until yeast were visible upon Gram stain, which in most cases was within 24 h.

Candida QuickFISH BC was performed according to the manufacturer's directions. Briefly, 10 μl of fluid from a positive blood culture bottle and one drop of QuickFix-1 were mixed on the sample area of the QuickFISH slide, left to dry (1 to 3 min), and then 2 drops of QuickFix-2 were added and allowed to dry for 1 min. One drop each of Candida PNA blue and Candida PNA yellow were mixed on a coverslip, which was placed onto the QuickFISH slide that contained the fixed blood sample, followed by incubation for 15 min at 55°C using the supplied heat block. The slides were then examined by fluorescence microscopy using appropriate filters. Green fluorescence indicates C. albicans, red fluorescence indicates C. glabrata, and yellow fluorescence indicates C. parapsilosis, whereas no fluorescence indicates a yeast other than C. albicans, C. glabrata, or C. parapsilosis.

The QuickFISH BC results were compared to conventional identification (germ tube test, growth or morphology on fungal media, and identification by API 20C, Phoenix, or Vitek yeast biochemical card, as appropriate). Since conventional identification systems may not distinguish C. parapsilosis from C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis, samples identified by conventional identification as C. parapsilosis were submitted for sequence analysis to distinguish between these species.

RESULTS

A total of 419 yeast-positive blood culture bottles were studied at the seven study sites, consisting of 258 clinical samples and 161 seeded samples (Table 1). Blood culture bottle types included BacT/Alert aerobic and anaerobic bottles and Bactec aerobic, anaerobic, and pediatric bottles (Table 2). The distribution of yeast species in the clinical and contrived samples is shown in Table 3. Sixty-five samples initially identified by conventional testing as C. parapsilosis were sequenced, and the results were as follows: 59 C. parapsilosis, 3 C. metapsilosis, 2 C. orthopsilosis, and 1 C. tropicalis sample.

TABLE 1.

Numbers of clinical and contrived samples tested from each study site

Study site No. of samples
Clinical Contrived
Case Western Reserve University 32 NAa
Cedars Sinai Medical Center 21 41
Columbia University Medical Center 37 39
Detroit Medical Center 25 NA
Indiana University 65 38
Johns Hopkins Hospital 47 3
University of Virginia 31 40
Total 258 161
a

NA, not applicable.

TABLE 2.

Distribution of clinical and contrived blood culture bottle types studied

Blood culture system and bottle typea No. of bottles studied
Clinical Contrived Total
BacT/Alert
    Aerobic 53 38 91
    Anaerobic 10 2 12
Bactec
    Aerobic 154 104 258
    Anaerobic 31b 17 48
    Pediatric 10 0 10
Total 258 161 419
a

All bottles were standard bottles unless indicated otherwise.

b

Four of these bottles were Bactec Anaerobic Plus bottles.

TABLE 3.

Identification of the yeast species present in the 419 samples studieda

Yeast speciesa No. of samples
Clinical Contrived Total (%)
Candida glabrata 89 40 129 (30.8)
Candida albicans 79 46 125 (29.8)
Candida parapsilosis 23 36 59 (14.1)
Candida tropicalis 18 19 37 (8.8)
Candida krusei 12 5 17 (4.1)
Candida guilliermondii 7 1 8 (1.9)
Candida lusitaniae 3 4 7 (1.7)
Candida dubliniensis 3 3 6 (1.4)
Candida metapsilosis 2 3 5 (1.2)
Candida orthopsilosis 3 1 4 (1.0)
Candida kefyr 2 1 3 (0.7)
Candida auris 1 1 (0.2)
Candida famata 1 1 (0.2)
Candida rugosa 1 1 (0.2)
Candida zeylanoides 1 1 (0.2)
Candida species, mixeda 4 4 (1.0)
Cryptococcus neoformans 6 6 (1.5)
Exophilia dermatitidis 1 1 (0.2)
Malassezia pachydermatis 1 1 (0.2)
Rhodotorula spp. 1 1 (0.2)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae 1 1 2 (0.5)
Total 258 161 419 (100)
a

For the Candida species used in the study, the numbers of clinical and contrived samples and the percentage of each Candida species are shown.

b

That is, C. albicans/C. glabrata (n = 2), C. glabrata/C. tropicalis(n = 1), and C. albicans/C. parapsilosis (n = 1).

A total of 415 samples contained a single fungal species, with C. glabrata (n = 129; 30.8%) being the most common isolate, followed by C. albicans (n = 125; 29.8%), C. parapsilosis (n = 59; 14.1%), C. tropicalis (n = 37; 8.8%), and C. krusei (n = 17; 4.1%). Four clinical samples contained two fungal species: C. albicans and C. glabrata (n = 2), C. glabrata and C. tropicalis (n = 1), or C. albicans and C. parapsilosis (n = 1). Of the 258 clinical specimens studied, it was noted that 217 were in aerobic and 41 in anaerobic bottles. It was further noted that the species distribution between aerobic and anaerobic bottle types differed, with 39.3% of the 89 C. glabrata versus 3.6% of the 169 other yeast species present in the anaerobic bottles (P < 0.0001). C. glabrata was found in 85.4% (35/41) of the clinical anaerobic bottles.

The overall agreement between conventional identification and QuickFISH BC was 99.3% (416/419) (Table 4). Agreement was 100% for C. albicans (n = 125), C. glabrata (n = 129) and mixed Candida species (n = 4). Agreement was 98.3% for C. parapsilosis (58/59), with no fluorescence detected in the one discrepant sample. There was 98.0% agreement (100/102) for other yeast species, with yellow fluorescence in the two discrepant samples, one of which contained C. metapsilosis and the other of which contained C. tropicalis. The overall sensitivity was 99.7%, and the specificity was 98.0%.

TABLE 4.

Comparison between Candida QuickFISH BC and conventional identification

Parameter C. albicans C. glabrata C. parapsilosis Other Mixeda Total
Conventional Candida QuickFISH BC identification (no. of strains)
    C. albicans (green) 125 0 0 0 0 125
    C. glabrata (red) 0 129 0 0 0 129
    C. parapsilosis (yellow) 0 0 58 2b 0 60
    Mixed fluorescence 0 0 0 0 4 4
    No fluorescence 0 0 1 100 0 101
Agreement, sensitivity, or specificity (%)
    Agreement 100 (125/125) 100 129/129 98.3 (58/59) 98.0 (100/102) 100 (4/4) 99.3 (416/419)
    Sensitivity 100 (125/125) 100 (129/129) 98.3 (58/59) NAc NA 99.7 (312/313)
    Specificity 100 (290/290) 100 (286/286) 99.4 (354/356) 99.5 (417/419) NA 98.0 (100/102)
a

That is, C. albicans/C. parapsilosis (n = 1), C. albicans/C. glabrata (n = 2), and C. glabrata/C. tropicalis (n = 1).

b

Candida metapsilosis (n = 1) and Candida tropicalis (n = 1).

c

NA, not applicable.

DISCUSSION

Currently, blood culture is the gold standard method for diagnosis of fungal bloodstream infections (12). When growth is detected, blood culture medium is sampled for Gram stain and subculture on agar plates for subsequent phenotypic identification (13), which typically takes at least 72 h (14). To overcome this relatively long turnaround time of identification, several molecular methods have been evaluated for identification of Candida species directly from blood culture bottles, such as real-time PCR (19, 20), multiplex-tandem PCR (21), PCR–high-resolution derivative melt analysis (22), PCR-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (23), DNA microarray (24), and PCR FilmArray (25). Other new detection technologies include CHROMagar (26), random amplified polymorphic DNA (27), MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy (2830), and PNA-FISH (15, 16, 31, 32). Recently, a new method to detect Candida directly from blood samples without culture has been developed, with a limit of detection of 1 CFU/ml of blood and a turnaround time of under 3 h (17, 18).

In our multicenter evaluation of a prototype lot, the Candida QuickFISH BC method for rapid identification directly from blood culture bottles of the three most common Candida species (C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis) was found to be sensitive, specific, and rapid. Furthermore, these three species were indeed shown to be the three most common yeast species present in clinical samples, being present in 74.0% of these samples. Individually, C. glabrata accounted for 34.5%, C. albicans accounted for 30.6%, and C. parapsilosis accounted for 8.9% of the clinical isolates. An interesting observation was that C. glabrata was the yeast species present in 85.4% (35/41) of the clinical anaerobic bottles studied, a finding in agreement with a recent publication documenting exclusive or earlier growth of C. glabrata in anaerobic vials in a large series of candidemic patients from two European hospitals (33).

The Candida QuickFISH BC procedure is simple, and results are obtained in about 30 min. All C. glabrata (129/129) and C. albicans (125/125) isolates and all but one of the 59 C. parapsilosis isolates were correctly identified compared to conventional methods. C. parapsilosis has recently been reclassified into three species: Candida parapsilosis (sensu stricto), Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis (34). Several in vitro studies have demonstrated differences in the geographical distribution, expression of virulence factors, and susceptibility to antifungal agents of these Candida spp. (35, 36). Differentiation within the C. parapsilosis complex is based on a variety of DNA techniques, such as internal transcriber spacer sequencing (37, 38).

Of the 102 yeast species other than C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis, the results of Candida QuickFISH BC were negative, in agreement with conventional methods, except for two samples, with the two discrepant results associated with false-positive yellow fluorescence for 1 of 5 samples containing C. metapsilosis and 1 of 37 samples containing C. tropicalis. The overall agreement between Candida QuickFISH BC and conventional methods was 99.3% (416/419). The C. albicans probe was species specific and did not react with any of the other yeast species tested, including 6 C. dubliniensis isolates. The C. parapsilosis probe did show two false-positive reactions, one with C. metapsilosis and the other with C. tropicalis, but did not react with 4 C. orthopsilosis, 17 other C. tropicalis, or 4 other C. metapsilosis isolates. The C. glabrata probe was species specific, although molecular characterization was not performed to distinguish this species from C. bracarensis or C. nivariensis.

There are many implications of rapid identification of C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis on therapy and antimicrobial stewardship. Technologies enabling rapid diagnosis of invasive candidiasis and the determination of the species of Candida isolates, such as T2 Candida, PNA-FISH, and MALDI-TOF MS, will allow appropriate, cost-effective treatment of patients with candidiasis. This rapid identification of yeast species will limit unnecessary use of antifungal agents and enable antifungal stewardship programs to improve care of patients with systemic candidiasis (39). Antifungal therapy of Candida bloodstream infections is frequently inappropriate and delayed, resulting in increased hospital stay and costs (40, 41).

Current clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Disease Society of America for the management of candidiasis recommend that several factors be considered to guide therapy. These include any history of recent azole exposure and intolerance to antifungal agents, predominant local Candida species and susceptibility data, disease severity, the presence of comorbidities, and central nervous system, cardiac valve, or visceral organ involvement (42). These guidelines note that successful treatment depends on early initiation of effective antifungal therapy, with higher mortality rates occurring when therapy is delayed. Fluconazole is recommended as a first-line therapy for patients with mild to moderate illness, who have had no previous azole exposure, and who do not have a high risk of C. glabrata infection. Amphotericin B should be used for endocardial or central nervous system infection or an echinocandin for endocardial candidiasis, followed by fluconazole for patients with susceptible isolates who improved clinically after initial therapy. Echinocandins are recommended for patients with moderately severe to severe illness or recent azole exposure, whereas fluconazole is suggested for patients who are not critically ill and have had no recent azole exposure. Echinocandins can be changed to fluconazole for clinically stable patients with C. albicans infection. Echinocandins are preferred for infections due to C. glabrata, whereas fluconazole is recommended for infections due to C. parapsilosis. For C. krusei infections, a short course of intravenous echinocandin therapy, followed by oral fluconazole or voriconazole, is suggested.

Limitations of the Candida QuickFISH BC assay include the detection of only three yeast species (although this encompasses the most commonly encountered Candida species), the relatively high cost of the assay, and the need for well-trained personnel to read the assay using fluorescence microscopy. Another limitation of the study is that a prototype lot of the Candida QuickFISH BC assay was used, pending results of stability and functionality of large-scale manufacturing lots, which may require modification of noncoding parts of the probes. Other platforms for the rapid detection of yeasts, such as PCR, are also limited by high cost and a low number of targets, with several assays targeting only a small number of species (C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis) due to limitations of the multiplexing capacities of many real-time PCR systems (4345).

In conclusion, this multicenter study demonstrated the high sensitivity of the Candida QuickFISH BC assay in detecting the three most common Candida species associated with bloodstream infections, C. albicans, C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis, and high specificity in differentiating these three Candida species from other yeast species.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This study was supported in part by AdvanDx, Woburn, MA.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. 2004. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in U.S. hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin Infect Dis 39:309–317. doi: 10.1086/421946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Perlroth J, Choi B, Spellberg B. 2007. Nosocomial fungal infections: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Med Mycol 45:321–346. doi: 10.1080/13693780701218689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. 2007. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev 20:133–163. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00029-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gudlaugsson O, Gillespie S, Lee K, Vande Berg J, Hu J, Messer S, Herwaldt L, Pfaller M, Diekema D. 2003. Attributable mortality of nosocomial candidemia, revisited. Clin Infect Dis 37:1172–1177. doi: 10.1086/378745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bassetti M, Righi E, Ansaldi F, Merelli M, Cecilia T, De Pascale G, Diaz-Martin A, Luzzati R, Rosin C, Lagunes L, Trecarichi EM, Sanguinetti M, Posteraro B, Garnacho-Montero J, Sartor A, Rello J, Rocca GD, Antonelli M, Tumbarello M. 2014. A multicenter study of septic shock due to candidemia: outcomes and predictors of mortality. Intensive Care Med 40:839–845. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3310-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bassetti M, Merelli M, Righi E, Diaz-Martin A, Rosello EM, Luzzati R, Parra A, Trecarichi EM, Sanguinetti M, Posteraro B, Garnacho-Montero J, Sartor A, Rello J, Tumbarello M. 2013. Epidemiology, species distribution, antifungal susceptibility, and outcome of candidemia across five sites in Italy and Spain. J Clin Microbiol 51:4167–4172. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01998-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Prasad PA, Fisher BT, Coffin SE, Walsh TJ, McGowan KL, Gross R, Zaoutis TE. 2013. Pediatric risk factors for candidemia secondary to Candida glabrata and Candida krusei species. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc 2:263–266. doi: 10.1093/jpids/pis093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zaoutis TE, Argon J, Chu J, Berlin JA, Walsh TJ, Feudtner C. 2005. The epidemiology and attributable outcomes of candidemia in adults and children hospitalized in the United States: a propensity analysis. Clin Infect Dis 41:1232–1239. doi: 10.1086/496922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Maccallum DM. 2012. Hosting infection: experimental models to assay Candida virulence. Int J Microbiol 2012:363764. doi: 10.1155/2012/363764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Miceli MH, Diaz JA, Lee SA. 2011. Emerging opportunistic yeast infections. Lancet Infect Dis 11:142–151. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70218-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Papon N, Courdavault V, Clastre M, Bennett RJ. 2013. Emerging and emerged pathogenic Candida species: beyond the Candida albicans paradigm. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003550. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Murray PR, Masur H. 2012. Current approaches to the diagnosis of bacterial and fungal bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 40:3277–3282. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318270e771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brandt ME, Warnock DW. 2011. Taxonomy and classification of fungi., p 1749–1755. In Versalovic J, Carroll KC, Funke G (ed), Manual of clinical microbiology, vol 2, 10th ed ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fernandez J, Erstad BL, Petty W, Nix DE. 2009. Time to positive culture and identification for Candida blood stream infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 64:402–407. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stone NR, Gorton RL, Barker K, Ramnarain P, Kibbler CC. 2013. Evaluation of PNA-FISH yeast traffic light for rapid identification of yeast directly from positive blood cultures and assessment of clinical impact. J Clin Microbiol 51:1301–1302. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00028-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hall L, Le Febre KM, Deml SM, Wohlfiel SL, Wengenack NL. 2012. Evaluation of the Yeast Traffic Light PNA FISH probes for identification of Candida species from positive blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 50:1446–1448. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06148-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Neely LA, Audeh M, Phung NA, Min M, Suchocki A, Plourde D, Blanco M, Demas V, Skewis LR, Anagnostou T, Coleman JJ, Wellman P, Mylonakis E, Lowery TJ. 2013. T2 magnetic resonance enables nanoparticle-mediated rapid detection of candidemia in whole blood. Sci Transl Med 5:182ra154. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Beyda ND, Alam MJ, Garey KW. 2013. Comparison of the T2Dx instrument with T2Candida assay and automated blood culture in the detection of Candida species using seeded blood samples. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 77:324–326. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Foongladda S, Mongkol N, Petlum P, Chayakulkeeree M. 2014. Multi-probe real-time PCR identification of four common Candida species in blood culture broth. Mycopathologia 177:251–261. doi: 10.1007/s11046-014-9743-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xafranski H, Melo AS, Machado AM, Briones MR, Colombo AL. 2013. A quick and low-cost PCR-based assay for Candida spp. identification in positive blood culture bottles. BMC Infect Dis 13:467. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lau A, Halliday C, Chen SC, Playford EG, Stanley K, Sorrell TC. 2010. Comparison of whole blood, serum, and plasma for early detection of candidemia by multiplex-tandem PCR. J Clin Microbiol 48:811–816. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01650-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mandviwala T, Shinde R, Kalra A, Sobel JD, Akins RA. 2010. High-throughput identification and quantification of Candida species using high resolution derivative melt analysis of panfungal amplicons. J Mol Diagn 12:91–101. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Laffler TG, Cummins LL, McClain CM, Quinn CD, Toro MA, Carolan HE, Toleno DM, Rounds MA, Eshoo MW, Stratton CW, Sampath R, Blyn LB, Ecker DJ, Tang YW. 2013. Enhanced diagnostic yields of bacteremia and candidemia in blood specimens by PCR-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol 51:3535–3541. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00876-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.De Luca Ferrari M, Ribeiro Resende M, Sakai K, Muraosa Y, Lyra L, Gonoi T, Mikami Y, Tominaga K, Kamei K, Zaninelli Schreiber A, Trabasso P, Moretti ML. 2013. Visual analysis of DNA microarray data for accurate molecular identification of non-albicans Candida isolates from patients with candidemia episodes. J Clin Microbiol 51:3826–3829. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01050-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Altun O, Almuhayawi M, Ullberg M, Ozenci V. 2013. Clinical evaluation of the FilmArray blood culture identification panel in identification of bacteria and yeasts from positive blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol 51:4130–4136. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01835-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Madhavan P, Jamal F, Chong PP, Ng KP. 2011. Identification of local clinical Candida isolates using CHROMagar Candida as a primary identification method for various Candida species. Trop Biomed 28:269–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xavier PC, Chang MR, Paula CR, Matsumoto FE, Asensi MD, Matos Mde F, Andreotti R. 2013. Molecular characterization of Candida spp. isolates from patients with bloodstream infections. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 46:786–787. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-1718-2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Spanu T, Posteraro B, Fiori B, D'Inzeo T, Campoli S, Ruggeri A, Tumbarello M, Canu G, Trecarichi EM, Parisi G, Tronci M, Sanguinetti M, Fadda G. 2012. Direct maldi-tof mass spectrometry assay of blood culture broths for rapid identification of Candida species causing bloodstream infections: an observational study in two large microbiology laboratories. J Clin Microbiol 50:176–179. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05742-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Calderaro A, Martinelli M, Motta F, Larini S, Arcangeletti MC, Medici MC, Chezzi C, De Conto F. 2013. Comparison of peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization assays with culture-based matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for the identification of bacteria and yeasts from blood cultures and cerebrospinal fluid cultures. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:O468–O475. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yan Y, He Y, Maier T, Quinn C, Shi G, Li H, Stratton CW, Kostrzewa M, Tang YW. 2011. Improved identification of yeast species directly from positive blood culture media by combining SepsiTyper specimen processing and Microflex analysis with the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization BioTyper system. J Clin Microbiol 49:2528–2532. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00339-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Gorton RL, Ramnarain P, Barker K, Stone N, Rattenbury S, McHugh TD, Kibbler CC. 2014. Comparative analysis of Gram's stain, PNA-FISH and Sepsityper with MALDI-TOF MS for the identification of yeast direct from positive blood cultures. Mycoses 57:592–5601. doi: 10.1111/myc.12205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rigby S, Procop GW, Haase G, Wilson D, Hall G, Kurtzman C, Oliveira K, Von Oy S, Hyldig-Nielsen JJ, Coull J, Stender H. 2002. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with peptide nucleic acid probes for rapid identification of Candida albicans directly from blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol 40:2182–2186. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.6.2182-2186.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cobos-Trigueros N, Kaasch AJ, Soriano A, Torres JL, Vergara A, Morata L, Zboromyrska Y, De La Calle C, Alejo I, Hernandez C, Cardozo C, Marco F, Del Rio A, Almela M, Mensa J, Martinez JA. 2014. Time to positivity and detection of growth in anaerobic blood culture vials predict the presence of Candida glabrata in candidemia: a two-center European cohort study. J Clin Microbiol 52:3082–3084. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01198-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tavanti A, Davidson AD, Gow NA, Maiden MC, Odds FC. 2005. Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis spp. nov. to replace Candida parapsilosis groups II and III. J Clin Microbiol 43:284–292. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.1.284-292.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Miranda-Zapico I, Eraso E, Hernandez-Almaraz JL, Lopez-Soria LM, Carrillo-Munoz AJ, Hernandez-Molina JM, Quindos G. 2011. Prevalence and antifungal susceptibility patterns of new cryptic species inside the species complexes Candida parapsilosis and Candida glabrata among blood isolates from a Spanish tertiary hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother 66:2315–2322. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Goncalves SS, Amorim CS, Nucci M, Padovan AC, Briones MR, Melo AS, Colombo AL. 2010. Prevalence rates and antifungal susceptibility profiles of the Candida parapsilosis species complex: results from a nationwide surveillance of candidaemia in Brazil. Clin Microbiol Infect 16:885–887. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03020.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tavanti A, Hensgens LA, Ghelardi E, Campa M, Senesi S. 2007. Genotyping of Candida orthopsilosis clinical isolates by amplification fragment length polymorphism reveals genetic diversity among independent isolates and strain maintenance within patients. J Clin Microbiol 45:1455–1462. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00243-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Garcia-Effron G, Canton E, Peman J, Dilger A, Roma E, Perlin DS. 2011. Assessment of two new molecular methods for identification of Candida parapsilosis sensu lato species. J Clin Microbiol 49:3257–3261. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00508-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Aitken SL, Beyda ND, Shah DN, Palmer HR, Lasco TM, Koo H, Garey KW. 2014. Clinical practice patterns in hospitalized patients at risk for invasive candidiasis: role of antifungal stewardship programs in an era of rapid diagnostics. Ann Pharmacother 48:683–690. doi: 10.1177/1060028014529928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zilberberg MD, Kollef MH, Arnold H, Labelle A, Micek ST, Kothari S, Shorr AF. 2010. Inappropriate empiric antifungal therapy for candidemia in the ICU and hospital resource utilization: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 10:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Vazquez J, Reboli AC, Pappas PG, Patterson TF, Reinhardt J, Chin-Hong P, Tobin E, Kett DH, Biswas P, Swanson R. 2014. Evaluation of an early step-down strategy from intravenous anidulafungin to oral azole therapy for the treatment of candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: results from an open-label trial. BMC Infect Dis 14:97. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, Benjamin DK Jr, Calandra TF, Edwards JE Jr, Filler SG, Fisher JF, Kullberg BJ, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Reboli AC, Rex JH, Walsh TJ, Sobel JD. 2009. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 48:503–535. doi: 10.1086/596757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jensen TG, Gahrn-Hansen B, Arendrup M, Bruun B. 2004. Fusarium fungaemia in immunocompromised patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 10:499–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00859.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pietrucha-Dilanchian P, Lewis RE, Ahmad H, Lechin AE. 2001. Candida lusitaniae catheter-related sepsis. Ann Pharmacother 35:1570–1574. doi: 10.1345/aph.1A077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Simarro E, Marin F, Morales A, Sanz E, Perez J, Ruiz J. 2001. Fungemia due to Scedosporium prolificans: a description of two cases with fatal outcome. Clin Microbiol Infect 7:645–647. doi: 10.1046/j.1198-743x.2001.00317.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES