Skip to main content
International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine logoLink to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
. 2015 Feb 15;8(2):3010–3016.

The diagnosis of gallbladder agenesis: two cases report

Li-Ming Tang 1, Xin-Fu Wang 1, Pei-Tu Ren 1, Guan-Geng Xu 1, Chen-Sheng Wang 1
PMCID: PMC4402921  PMID: 25932274

Abstract

Congenital absence of the gallbladder is an extremely rare embryological aberration that is frequently mistaken for cholecystolithiasis; the aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic methods for agenesis of the gallbladder. Two surgically confirmed gallbladder agenesis cases in our hospital and 75 cases of gallbladder agenesis reported in the literature in China were reviewed. It is extremely difficult to make a correct diagnosis of gallbladder agenesis before operation. When suspected, it may be confirmed by ERCP and MRCP. Interoperate, if no gallbladder can be found during laparoscopy, open surgery should be immediately performed Clinician’s understanding of this disease is of great help in avoiding unnecessary surgical exploration and minimizing the risk of complication. Patients with gallbladder agenesis can be classified into two new types, I: Symptomatic, II: Asymptomatic. Type I can be divided into two subtypes: I a with fatal malformations and I b without fatal malformations.

Keywords: Gallbladder agenesis, diagnosis

Introduction

Gallbladder agenesis without biliary atresia is an extremely rare embryonic aberration. Patients become symptomatic in 23% of cases [1,2], and gallbladder agenesis will almost always be misinterpreted as cholecystitis with cystic duct obstruction or as a sclero-atrophic gallbladder. Misdiagnosis leads unnecessary operations. We reviewed 77 cases of gallbladder agenesis. The 75 cases reported in the literature of “The China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)” from Jan 1994 to Jan 2006. Keyword search used was gallbladder agenesis. In 1991 and 2006, 2 cases of gallbladder agenesis were reported in our hospital, and these are briefly described.

Materials and methods

Cases in our hospital

Case 1

The 44-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of confirmed gallstone under transabdominal ultrasonography in a routine physical examination. He presented no right upper bellyache, no nausea, no vomiting, no chill, and no fever. Repeated ultrasonography showed a 3.1 cm×1.1 cm gallbladder (Figure 1), with arc-shaped light band inside and acoustic shadow backside, with no choledochectasia. Physical examination: no yellow skin and sclera, belly flat and soft, no tenderness, and negative Murphy’s sign. He was diagnosed with cholelithiasis and cholecystic atrophy. The patient was taken to the operating room for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) on Oct 30th, 2006. The initial exploration failed to find the gallbladder. Laparotomy was immediately adopted. The upper part of common bile duct was dilated to 1.5 cm, but still no gallbladder was seen, no stone was palpitated. Ultrasonography during operation showed a negative result consistent with the postoperative ultrasound and CT scan (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Ultrasound shows an abdominal solitary large stone (GBST) in the gallbladder.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

CT scan shows no gallbladder can be found.

Case 2

This case was a 45-year-old woman presenting upper bellyache, fever and vomiting for 1 day. Physical examination: T39.3°C; Yellow skin and sclera, flat belly, liver palpitated 3 cm below right costal margin, 4 cm below xiphoid process; upper belly tenderness was noted, with no rebound tenderness, and Murphy’s sign negative. B ultrasonography: gallbladder wasn’t clearly visualized, approximately 4.0 cm×1.5 cm; The common bile duct was dilated to 2.1 cm inside which a 1.9 cm strong echo can be seen with acoustic shadow. She was diagnosed with chronic atrophic cholecystitis, choledocholith and acute suppurative cholangitis. Open exploration was conducted on Dec 3, 1991. The following was seen: the left half of the liver was 2 times as big as the right half, the hepatic porta was rotated toward the back right direction; gallbladder wasn’t detected; common bile duct was dilated to 1.6 cm containing purulent bile but no calculus; a 3 cm×3 cm×3 cm hard mass could be palpitated in the ampulla. Ampulla cancers, acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis, congenital liver malformation combining gallbladder agenesis were diagnosed according to the findings made in the operation. Postoperative CT scan prompted diagnosis of ampulla cancer and gallbladder agenesis. T-tube cholangiography showed lower bile duct obstruction, mild dilation in the intrahepatic bile duct; no contrast material filled where was supposed to be the gallbladder. The patient died 9 months later.

Literature data

We include 75 cases in this group (Table 1). 4 of them presented no symptoms at all, 68 had a history of right-upper-quadrant pain, the others exhibited left-upper-quadrant pain (combining situs inversus viscerum); 34 patients had jaundice; 10 patients had nausea and vomiting; 12 patients complained of a lack of appetite; 19 patients had fever. 69 patients took a preoperative ultrasound study, 4 of whom accepted CT or MRI scan simultaneously. 2 patients took PTC (percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography). The assisted examination wasn’t described thoroughly in the clinical data of the other 4 patients.

Table 1.

Preoperative diagnosis

Preoperative diagnosis Cases in our hospital Cases In the literature
Congenital gallbladder agenesis 2
Congenital gallbladder agenesis, choledocholith 3
Cholelithiasis 1 36
Cholelithiasis, choledocholith 5
Choledocholith 20
Cholelithiasis, choledocholith, acute suppurative cholangitis 1
Atrophic cholecystitis 2
Atrophic cholecystitis and jaundice without definite cause 1
Acute cholangitis 2
Choledochalcyst 1
Abdominal stabbing injury 1
Left lateral hepatic tumor 1
Situs inversus viscerum accompanied by choledocholith 1
Total 2 75

Preoperative diagnosis (Table 1): 2 cases were diagnosed with congenital gallbladder agenesis, 3 were congenital gallbladder agenesis with choledocholith, 36 were cholelithiasis, 5 were cholelithiasis with choledocholith, 20 were choledocholith, 2 were atrophic cholecystitis, 1 was atrophic cholecystitis and jaundice without definite cause, 2 were acute cholangitis, 1 was choledochal cyst, 1 was abdominal stabbing injury, 1 was left lateral hepatic tumor, 1 was situs inversus viscerum accompanied by choledocholith.

Treatment

Laparotomy was applied to 73 cases except 1 that had been diagnosed with congenital gallbladder agenesis and 1 that selected laparoscope exploration.

Postoperative diagnosis (Table 2)

Table 2.

Postoperative diagnosis

Postoperative diagnosis Cases in our hospital Cases In the literature
Congenital gallbladder agenesis 1 36
Congenital gallbladder agenesis, choledocholith 1 27
Congenital gallbladder agenesis, ampullae’s cancer, choledocholith 1
Congenital gallbladder agenesis, acute cholangitis 3
Congenital gallbladder agenesis, choledochal cyst 1
Congenital gallbladder agenesis, abdominal stabbing injury 1
Congenital gallbladder agenesis, left lateral hepatic tumor 1
Congenital gallbladder agenesis, situs inversus viscerum combining choledocholith 1
Congenital gallbladder agenesis, choledocholith, lower common bile duct narrowing 3
Congenital gallbladder agenesis, choledocholith, lower common bile duct valve 1
Total 2 75

Congenital gallbladder agenesis existed in all patients while 39 of them had other combining diseases. Within the 36 cases given the preoperative diagnosis of cholelithiasis, 31 turned out to be congenital gallbladder agenesis and the other 5 combined choledocholith.

Altogether 34 cases (2 misdiagnosed with atrophic cholecystitis, 32 with cholelithiasis) undertook unnecessary operation. Inevitable visceral injuries occurred in the exploration process: 1 in bile duct, 1 in transverse colon, and 1 in duodenum, all of which were properly and quickly fixed. During the operation, 4 took cholangiography, 1 took ultrasonography. After the operation, 6 received CT scan, 4 received ERCP, and others chose ultrasonography as a rechecking method. A gallbladder wasn’t discovered in any of these cases.

Results

Ectopic gallbladder was found in none of these cases, but with the help of explorative surgery, varying degrees of organ malformation were noticed: 3 had lower common bile duct narrowing, 3 had choledochectasia, 1 was aproblem with the lower common bile duct valve, and 1 was situs inversus viscerum.

Discussion

The pathogenesis of gallbladder agenesis is not fully interpreted yet. Currently we view it as a congenital malformation. Hepatic diverticulum in a 4-week-old embryo is regarded as the bud of liver, gallbladder and bile duct [3]. The end of hepatic diverticulum expands and separates into caudal and rostral branches. The caudal branch elongates to form a vacuole, which gradually swells. The gallbladder consequently takes its shape (anlage). Meanwhile the proximal narrow segment develops into the cystic duct. The gallbladder is a hollow organ initially, but subsequently transforms to a contemporary solid state because of coating epithelial hyperplasia, which later reopens accompanying epithelial liquefaction. Caudal branch hypoplasia will predispose to gallbladder and cystic duct agenesis. Besides, a solid gallbladder can be detected if the epithelial liquefaction step is missed. Most cases are dispersed, but familial clustering phenomenon also exists [2,4-9], reminding us that a genetic factor may play a part in the pathogenesis of gallbladder agenesis. However no such case was found in our study.

According to the literature, the incidence of gallbladder agenesis is 0.013%~0.075% [10] overseas and 0.07%~0.38% in China [11-13]. Bennion et al. [14] classification methods are most frequently referred to. There are 3 categories: (1) multiple congenital malformations: occupying 12.8%~30% of the total cases, in which 9% are combined with biliary atresia, 12.8%~21% combined other deformities with normal bile ducts. Most of these patients died shortly after their birth. (2) Asymptomatic type: occupies 31.6%. The absence of gallbladder was discovered accidentally in autopsy, other open surgeries, or when the patients’ relatives undergo medical screening. (3) Symptomatic type: occupies 55.6%. Symptomatology includes biliary symptoms consistent with an intact gallbladder, such as right-upper-quadrant pain, nausea, vomiting, and intolerance to fatty foods, dyspepsia, jaundice, and choledoch- olith.

After analyzing the data, we find Bennion’s classification is not appropriate enough. His criterion isn’t united. Type (1) is actually multiple congenital malformations, while gallbladder agenesis is just one insignificant part, imposing no threat on people’s lives. Congenital malformation can be divided into lethal and nonlethal kinds. Under the former circumstance, infants may die in the perinatal period, but babies could survive and manifest the symptoms mentioned above if the situation happened to be the latter one. There is an overlap between Bennion’s (1) and (3) types promoting confusion. Take, for example, case 2 in our hospital. Congenital liver malformation and gallbladder agenesis coexist in the same patient. Similar cases can be found in the literature. Dual attribution becomes a tough problem. Here we suggest a classification method as below, I: symptomatic type: can be further divided into I a and I b subtypes. Type I a: Accompanied by lethal deformities such as biliary atresia, ventricular septal defect, imperforate anus, duodenal atresia, etc. The majority of suffers die shortly after birth; I b: Accompanied by nonlethal deformities such as intestinal malrotation, right liver agenesis, cryptorchism, choledochal cyst, choledochectasia, etc. In this study, the major clinical manifestations include: right-upper-quadrant pain 95.8% (69/72), nausea and vomiting 15.3% (11/72), lack of appetite 16.7% (12/72), jaundice 48.6% (35/72), fever 27.8% (20/72). II: Asymptomatic type: it accounts for approximate 6.5% (5/77) of all cases.

Type I b occupies a proportion of 93.5% (72/77) which is significantly higher than the other types, similar to the figure 94% reported by literature overseas [13]. The attributable reasons maybe: the collaboration of gallbladder, bile duct and the Oddi sphincter in bile reservation and discharge under neural and humoral control is interrupted, resulting in the Oddi sphincter dysfunction and bile duct dyskinesia; in addition, the presence of other deformities within the bile system such as congenital Oddi sphincter dysfunction, bile duct dyskinesia, choledochectasia, etc, ought to be responsible for the figure; or possibly all the reasons mentioned above coexist. All these will promote biliary stasis, infection, choledocholith and corresponding biliary symptoms [15,16]. The incidence of choledocholith is 44.2% (34/77) in our study object accords with the statistical result overseas that ranged from 20% to 50% [14,17].

Compared to Bennion’s statistics, the proportion of type I a and II seems relatively low. We attribute this to the inadequacy of physical examination and autopsy popularization where the error emerges. Nevertheless, when consulting the statistics of Zhou JZ et al. [18], gallbladder agenesis accounts for just 3.4% in paediatric congenital multiple malformations.

Although ultrasonography and other image diagnostic technology provide us with high veracity and classification criteria, gallbladder agenesis is still a difficult thing to diagnose before operation [1,15,19-24]. Almost all the symptomatic gallbladder agenesis is confirmed through cystectomy under either transabdominal or laparoscope, but asymptomatic cases are generally detected in autopsy, irrelevant open surgery or screening of patients’ family members [25]. 34 (33+1) patients, equal to 44.7% (34/76) of our total objects were misdiagnosed and suffered unnecessary operations.

Misdiagnosis is responsible for unnecessary operations. The common reasons for misdiagnosis are: (1) apparent biliary symptoms such as right-upper-quadrant pain, nausea and vomiting, lack of appetite, jaundice, pyrexia; CA199 may elevate in one or two patients [26], (2) false positive B ultrasound report: intestinal artifacts [27], bile duct dilation and calculus, strip-form fibrous tissue at the normal position of gallbladder [28,29], (3) Ultrasound doctors and surgeons didn’t include this diagnosis into their logical speculation because the chance to come across this malformation in their clinical experience is so rare. Neglect of this congenital malformation is a dominating reason for misdiagnosis.

Regarding the high frequency of misdiagnosis, we recommend that suspected patients with preoperative B ultrasonographic findings of absent or atrophic gallbladder should undergo further examinations such as CT, ERCP [7,20,30-32], and MRC [33,34] in order to avoid unnecessary operation [36]. Chao et al. [37] retrospectively analyzed the preoperative assisted examinations of 9 patients who were later diagnosed with gallbladder agenesis in the operation. He found CT is of great use in elevating preoperative diagnosis rate while cutting down open exploration rate. Orlando et al. [38] believe MRCP following B ultrasonograph also helps.

There is another viewpoint proposing laparoscopic exploration [16,39], but we think if no gallbladder can be found during the exploration, open surgery should be immediately performed. Because ectopic locations for the gallbladder must be excluded before the diagnosis of gallbladder agenesis is made, careful exploration should be carried out. Ectopic gallbladders may be located in the liver, between the leaves of the lesser omentum, in the retroperitoneum and retrohepatic region, within the falciform ligament, or in the retroduodenal and retropancreatic area. Such locations are difficult to reach with a laparoscope [40], ultrasonography [13,37] or cholangiography [17,41] can help with the diagnosis. However, excessive exploration may bring on visceral damage [39,42,43] because of the presence of anatomic variation in the bile duct system and the difficulty in exposing the Calot triangle [44]. 4 cases [13,45,46] in our study suffered iatrogenic injury during the exploration.

Currently, preoperative diagnosis of gallbladder agenesis is still very difficult, but sufficient cognition of this disease can help doctors distinguish suspected cases, make a correct diagnosis, avoid unnecessary operations and lessen exploration complications.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Guo HY, M.D. and Zhou JQ, M.D. from Shaoxing Hospital of Zhejiang University, for critical reading of the manuscript. Wu X, M.D. and Wendy from Shaoxing University, for collection the foreign data.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Serour F, Klin B, Strauss S, Vinograd I. False-positive ultrasonography in agenesis of gallbladder: a pitfall in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993;3:144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nadeau LA, Cloutier WA, Konecki JT, Morin G, Taylor RW. Hereditary gallbladder agenesis: twelve cases in the same family. J Maine Med Assoc. 1972;63:1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blechschmidt CM. Agenesis of the gallbladder-borderlinecase of normality? Anat Anz. 1982;151:281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kabiri H, Domingo OH, Tzarnas CD. Agenesis of the gallbladder. Curr Surg. 2006;63:104. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2005.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wilson JE, Deitrick JE. Agenesis of the gallbladder: case report and familial investigation. Surgery. 1986;99:106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sterchi RB, Baraitser M. A diagnostic compendium. 1st edition. Cambridge: Chapman and Hall Medical; 1991. Multiple congenital anomalies; p. 109. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Venuta A, Laudizi L, Miceli F, Pantusa M, Laudizi Z. Agenesis of the gallbladder. Description of 2 cases in 2 siblings. Pediatr Med Chir. 1989;11:465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Becker IW, Mastroni PP. Congenital absence of the gallbladder with a family history. Am Surg. 1979;45:541. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kobacker JL. Congenital absence of the galbladder: a possible hereditary defect. Ann Int Med. 1950;25:1008. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-33-4-1008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Singh B, Satyapal KS, Moodley J, Haffejee AA. Congenital absence of the gall bladder. Surg Radial Anat. 1999;21:221. doi: 10.1007/BF01630907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang CH, Cai ZJ, Wang H. Gall bladder agenesis in abdominal operation: the report of six cases. Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery. 2003;11:160. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zheng MH, Chen JR, Zhou WJ. Congenital gallbladder agenesis combining choledocholith: two cases report. Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery. 2000;6:86. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li XY, Gao WS, Yang ZY. Congenital gallbladder agenesis: four cases report. Chinese Journal of Surgery. 2003;41:874. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bennion RS, Thompson JE JR, Tompkins RK. Agenesis of the gallbladder without extrahepatic biliary atresia. Arch Surg. 1988;123:1257. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400340083014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gotohdan N, Itano S, Horiki S, Endo A, Nakao A, Terada N, Tanaka N. Gallbladder agenesis with no other biliary tract abnormality: report of a case and review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7:327. doi: 10.1007/s005340070057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Akoh JA, George MM, Auld CD, Walls AD. Congenital absence of the gallbladder: ways of avoiding laparotomy. Br J Clin Pract. 1994;48:77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jackson RJ, McClellan D. Agenesis of the gallbladder: a cause of false-positive ultrasonography. Am Surg. 1989;55:36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhou JZ, Wu S, Chen L. Pathological Analysis of Fatal Malformations From 515 Perinatal Autopsies. Chinese Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2003;6:96. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sabiston CS. Surgery. 15th edition. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1997. p. 118. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cabajo CM, Martin del Olmo JC, Blanco AJ, Atienza Sanchez R. Gallbladder and cystic duct absence. An infrequent malformation in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:483. doi: 10.1007/s004649900397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Amaral JF, Ferland R. Agenesis of the gallbladder: laparoscopic diagnosis. Surg Lapa-rosc Endosc. 1993;3:337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Belli G, D’Agostino A, Iannelli A, Rotondano G, Ceccarelli P. Isolated agenesis of the gallbladder. An intraoperative problem. Minerva Chir. 1997;52:1119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kestenholz PB, von FM, Harder F. Agenesis of the gallbladder in adults: a laparoscopic diagnosis. Chirurg. 1997;68:643. doi: 10.1007/s001040050246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Azmat N, Francis KR, Mandava N, Pizzi WF. Agenesis of the gallbladder revisited laparoscopically. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:1269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Peloponissios N, Gillet M, Cavin R, Halkic N. Agenesis of the gallbladder: A dangerously misdiagnosed malformation. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:6228. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i39.6228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Trompetas V, Panagopoulos E, Ramantanis G. Gallbladder agenesis presenting with obstructive jaundice and elevated CA 19-9. Acta Chir Belg. 2004;104:347. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2004.11679571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tian BS, Huo XH, Zhang JS. Congenital gallbladder agenesis: two cases report. Chinese Journal of Surgery of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine. 2004;10:31. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lv DC, Yang FN. A case report of congenital gallbladder agenesis with common hepatic (bile) duct valve. Chinese Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 1998;19:225. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Jiang W, Cao H, Wang YY. A case of misdiagnosis of congenital gallbladder agenesis. Chinese Journal of Ultrasound in medicine. 2000;16:544. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.O’Sullivan J, O’Brien PA, MacFeely L, Whelton MJ. Congenital absence of the gallbladder and cystic duct: nonoperative diagnosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1987;82:1190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lotz G, Stahlschmidt M. Agenesis of the gallbladder. Chirurg. 1986;57:37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kennard GK. Congenital agenesis of the gallbladder. A diagnostic problem. Report of a case. Mil Med. 1985;150:283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chan FL, Chan JK, Leong LL. Modern imaging in the evaluation of hepatolithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology. 1997;44:358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Vanbeckevoort D, Van HL, Ponette E, Marchal G, Bosmans H, De CB. Imaging of gallbladder and biliary tract before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of intravenous cholangiography and the combined use of HASTE and singleshot RARE MR imaging. J Belge Radiol. 1997;80:6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schuster DM, Pedrosa MC, Robbins AH. Magnetic resonance cholangiography. Abdom Imaging. 1995;20:353. doi: 10.1007/BF00203370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xiao M, Li JL, Wei XM. Three cases of congenital gallbladder anatomical variation. Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery. 2003;9:523. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chao CH, Suh KW, Min JS, Kim CK. Congenital absence of gallbladder. Yonsei Med J. 1992;33:364. doi: 10.3349/ymj.1992.33.4.364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Orlando R, Candiani F, Lirussi F. Agenesis of the gallbladder associated with Gilbert's syndrome. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:757. doi: 10.1007/s004640000387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Peloponissios N, Gillet M, Cavin R, Halkic N. Agenesis of the gallbladder: a dangerously misdiagnosed malformation. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:6228. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i39.6228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Raju SG. Agenesis of the gallbladder in two adults: brief review of the literature. Am J Gastroenterol. 1972;57:55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kwon AH, Yanagimoto H, Matsui Y, Imamura A. Agenesis of the gallbladder with hypoplastic cystic duct diagnosed at laparoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006;16:251. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200608000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Pan WQ, Yin YM, Ai H. Gallbladder agenesis: two cases report. Chinese Journal of General Surgery. 2002;10:101. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Peng XQ, Wei QZ, Nie H. The misdiagnosis of congenital gallbladder agenesis with cholelithiasis. Beijing Medical Journal. 2006;28:346. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Dalla Torre A, D’Amata G, Perri SG, Pietrasanta D, Palmieri I, Moraldi A. Isolated agenesis of the gallbladder: case report. G Chir. 2004;25:294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu C, Lv Y, Wang ZF. The lessons in the diagnosis and treatment of congenital gallbladder agenesis. Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery. 2002;8:375. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhou YG, Li ZH, Shi GJ. Congenital gallbladder agenesis with operational combination: a case report. Journal of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery. 2002;14:131. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES