Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1980 Mar;65(3):557–559. doi: 10.1104/pp.65.3.557

Lipopolysaccharide Composition of the Wilt Pathogen, Pseudomonas solanacearum

CORRELATION WITH THE HYPERSENSITIVE RESPONSE IN TOBACCO 1

Mariamne H Whatley *, Nora Hunter *, Michael A Cantrell *, Carol Hendrick *, Kenneth Keegstra 2, Luis Sequeira *
PMCID: PMC440376  PMID: 16661235

Abstract

In the induction of the hypersensitive response (HR) in tobacco by Pseudomonas solanacearum, the recognition between host and pathogen is thought to involve an interaction between plant lectins and bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The LPS of a series of strains of P. solanacearum were examined to determine if there are structural differences that might account for the ability or inability of these strains to induce the hypersensitive response. Analysis of the components of LPS by gas chromatography indicates a clear difference in sugar composition between the HR-inducing and non-HR-inducing strains, especially in terms of the percentage of glucose, xylose and rhamnose. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis shows there are two distinct kinds of LPS, differing greatly in size, which correspond to rough and smooth LPS in other systems. In addition, a phage, CH154, was isolated which lyses non-HR-inducing bacteria and which is inactivated by LPS from these bacterial strains. Therefore, differences in LPS structure correlate strongly with host recognition of Pseudomonas solanacearum.

Full text

PDF

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burke D., Keegstra K. Carbohydrate structure of Sindbis virus glycoprotein E2 from virus grown in hamster and chicken cells. J Virol. 1979 Feb;29(2):546–554. doi: 10.1128/jvi.29.2.546-554.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carlson R. W., Sanders R. E., Napoli C., Albersheim P. Host-Symbiont Interactions: III. Purification and Partial Characterization of Rhizobium Lipopolysaccharides. Plant Physiol. 1978 Dec;62(6):912–917. doi: 10.1104/pp.62.6.912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DISCHE Z. Qualitative and quantitative colorimetric determination of heptoses. J Biol Chem. 1953 Oct;204(2):983–997. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DUDMAN W. F. Comparison of slime from tomato and banana strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum. Nature. 1959 Dec 19;184(Suppl 25):1969–1970. doi: 10.1038/1841969a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dröge W., Lehmann V., Lüderitz O., Westphal O. Structural investigations on the 2-keto-3-deoxyoctonate region of lipopolysaccharides. Eur J Biochem. 1970 May 1;14(1):175–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1970.tb00276.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fairbanks G., Steck T. L., Wallach D. F. Electrophoretic analysis of the major polypeptides of the human erythrocyte membrane. Biochemistry. 1971 Jun 22;10(13):2606–2617. doi: 10.1021/bi00789a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Graham T. L., Sequeira L., Huang T. S. Bacterial lipopolysaccharides as inducers of disease resistance in tobacco. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 Oct;34(4):424–432. doi: 10.1128/aem.34.4.424-432.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jann B., Reske K., Jann K. Heterogeneity of lipopolysaccharides. Analysis of polysaccharide chain lengths by sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Eur J Biochem. 1975 Dec 1;60(1):239–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1975.tb20996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. KLEMENT Z. RAPID DETECTION OF THE PATHOGENICITY OF PHYTOPATHOGENIC PSEUDOMONADS. Nature. 1963 Jul 20;199:299–300. doi: 10.1038/199299b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kelman A., Hruschka J. The role of motility and aerotaxis in the selective increase of avirulent bacteria in still broth cultures of Pseudomonas solanacearum. J Gen Microbiol. 1973 May;76(1):177–188. doi: 10.1099/00221287-76-1-177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Maier R. J., Brill W. J. Involvement of Rhizobium japonicum O antigen in soybean nodulation. J Bacteriol. 1978 Mar;133(3):1295–1299. doi: 10.1128/jb.133.3.1295-1299.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Whatley M. H., Bodwin J. S., Lippincott B. B., Lippincott J. A. Role of Agrobacterium cell envelope lipopolysaccharide in infection site attachment. Infect Immun. 1976 Apr;13(4):1080–1083. doi: 10.1128/iai.13.4.1080-1083.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wolpert J. S., Albersheim P. Host-symbiont interactions. I. The lectins of legumes interact with the o-antigen-containing lipopolysaccharides of their symbiont Rhizobia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1976 Jun 7;70(3):729–737. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(76)90653-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wright B. G., Rebers P. A. Procedure for determining heptose and hexose in lipopolysaccharides. Modification of the cysteine-sulfuric acid method. Anal Biochem. 1972 Oct;49(2):307–319. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(72)90433-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES