Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1980 Jun;65(6):1096–1098. doi: 10.1104/pp.65.6.1096

Temperature Effects on Soybean Imbibition and Leakage

A Carl Leopold 1
PMCID: PMC440488  PMID: 16661338

Abstract

As a part of an analysis of the nature of chilling injury to seeds, measurements were made of the initial linear rates of water entry into and solute leakage out of cotyledons of soybean at various temperatures. Arrhenius plots were approximately linear for water entry into both living and dead cotyledons, with the slope (and activation energy) for entry into living cells being insignificantly higher than for dead cells, suggesting little effect of membrane barriers on water entry. The plots for solute leakage showed 10-fold lower leakage rates from living than from dead tissues; a reversal of slope in the Arrhenius plot at temperatures below 15 C reflected increasing leakage rates, interpreted as a quantitative disruption of membrane reorganization at the temperatures associated with chilling injury.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bramlage W. J., Leopold A. C., Parrish D. J. Chilling Stress to Soybeans during Imhibition. Plant Physiol. 1978 Apr;61(4):525–529. doi: 10.1104/pp.61.4.525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CHATTERJEE A. OVARIAN RESPONSE TO ADMINISTRATION "PMS" IN CHLORPROMAZINIZED AND RESERPINIZED FEMALE RATS. Naturwissenschaften. 1965 Jun;52:309–309. doi: 10.1007/BF00608052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Glinka Z., Reinhold L. Reversible Changes in the Hydraulic Permeability of Plant Cell Membranes. Plant Physiol. 1964 Nov;39(6):1043–1050. doi: 10.1104/pp.39.6.1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HERRERA T., PETERSON W. H., COOPER E. J., PEPPLER H. J. Loss of cell constituents on reconstitution of active dry yeast. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1956 Jul;63(1):131–143. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(56)90017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Parrish D. J., Leopold A. C. On the mechanism of aging in soybean seeds. Plant Physiol. 1978 Mar;61(3):365–368. doi: 10.1104/pp.61.3.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Parrish D. J., Leopold A. C. Transient changes during soybean imbibition. Plant Physiol. 1977 Jun;59(6):1111–1115. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.6.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pollock B. M., Toole V. K. Imbibition period as the critical temperature sensitive stage in germination of lima bean seeds. Plant Physiol. 1966 Feb;41(2):221–229. doi: 10.1104/pp.41.2.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Waggoner P. E., Parlange J. Y. Water uptake and water diffusivity of seeds. Plant Physiol. 1976 Feb;57(2):153–156. doi: 10.1104/pp.57.2.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. van Steveninck J., Ledeboer A. M. Phase transitions in the yeast cell membrane. The influence of temperature on the reconstitution of active dry yeast. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1974 May 30;352(1):64–70. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(74)90179-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES