Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Feb 18;1342(1):53–61. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12708

The biology of Plasmodium vivax explored through genomics

Zunping Luo 1, Steven A Sullivan 1, Jane M Carlton 1
PMCID: PMC4405435  NIHMSID: NIHMS654348  PMID: 25693446

Abstract

Malaria is a mosquito-borne disease caused by the Plasmodium parasite. Of the four Plasmodium species that routinely cause human malaria, P. vivax is the most widespread species outside Africa, causing ~ 18.9 million cases in 2012. P. vivax cannot be cultured continuously in vitro, which severely hampers research in non-endemic and endemic countries alike. Consequently, whole-genome sequencing has become an effective means to interrogate the biology of the P. vivax parasite. Our comparative genomic analysis of five P. vivax reference genomes and several whole-genome sequences of the closely related monkey malaria species Plasmodium cynomolgi has revealed an extraordinary level of genetic diversity and enabled characterization of novel multi-gene families and important single-copy genes. The generation of whole-genome sequences from multiple clinical isolates is also driving forward knowledge concerning the biology and evolution of the species. Understanding the biology of P. vivax is crucial to develop potential antimalarial drugs and vaccines and to achieve the goal of eliminating malaria.

Keywords: malaria, genomics, Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium cynomolgi

Introduction

Malaria is an infectious disease caused by the Plasmodium parasite that is transmitted by the bite of infected female Anopheles mosquitoes. Over 200 species of Plasmodium infect mammals, birds, and reptiles, and of the 53 mammalian Plasmodium species, 30 infect primates.1 Among the four species that routinely cause malaria in humans (P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. malariae and P. ovale), P. falciparum receives the most attention because of its high level of mortality, mostly of children under the age of 5 in Africa. However, Plasmodium vivax, while not endemic in Africa because of its restriction to infecting Duffy+ red blood cells (RBCs), also has a significant impact on the health and longevity of human populations in tropical and subtropical parts of the world. It is the most prevalent human malaria parasite outside sub-Saharan Africa, causing an estimated 18.9 million cases in 20122 and contributing to 50% of the total global malaria cases there.2 Indeed, high endemicity and large population densities make Central Asia and Southeast Asia globally significant for P. vivax. For example, of the 2.48 billion people at risk, India contributes to ~ 46% of the burden.3 Recent studies have described the emergence of severe vivax infections (reviewed in Ref. 4), underscoring the importance of research into this global health burden.

P. vivax is closely related to a large clade of malaria parasites that infect cercopithecoid (Old World) monkeys and lesser apes of Southeast Asia (Fig. 1), including Plasmodium cynomolgi, one of its closest sister taxa, which infects Asian macaque monkeys. Because of this close relatedness, and the apparent lack of P. vivax in Africa, it was assumed that P. vivax had arisen from a host switch from monkeys to humans some time in its evolutionary past.5 Recently, however, P. vivax–like parasites have been found in wild apes (gorillas and chimpanzees) in parts of West Africa.6 Interestingly, the ape parasites and human P. vivax in this study appear to represent a single species, although the human P. vivax from various non-African locations form a distinct lineage within the ape parasites, clustering according to geographical origin.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A Plasmodium cartoon phylogeny. The Plasmodium species that routinely cause malaria in humans are highly evolutionarily diverse, and only P. falciparum and P. vivax are shown here. The tree was generated using mitochondrial fragments of cytochrome B and cytochrome C oxidase subunit I coding regions, using maximum likelihood methods, and is adapted from Refs. 6 and 44.

In addition to a distinctive evolution, P. vivax has evolved a group of unique biological characteristics (Table 1). First, unlike P. falciparum, P. vivax has a hypnozoite stage, during which parasites can remain dormant for long periods in the liver, causing relapses weeks or months later. Also, P. vivax displays a preference for invading reticulocytes, which represent 1–2% of circulating human RBCs, whereas P. falciparum is capable of invading both reticulocytes and normocytes. Furthermore, after merozoites are released from the liver and invade RBCs, the sexual stages are produced early in an infection compared to P. falciparum. In addition to these biological characteristics that render research on the species challenging, P. vivax cannot be cultured continuously in vitro, resulting in a limited capability of researchers to perform functional assays.7 The ability to interrogate the biology of P. vivax and to undertake research on this species therefore would appear bleak, were it not for the tremendous insights that whole-genome sequencing of monkey-adapted strains and patient isolates has recently started to provide. In this brief review, we show how the generation and analysis of P. vivax whole-genome sequences by ourselves and others has proven highly effective at probing the biology of the species and has provided insights into the parasite’s population genetics, genetic diversity, and evolution that were previously unknown.

Table 1.

Summary of some biological features between the human malaria species P. vivax and P. falciparum, and the monkey model P. cynomolgi.

P. vivax P. cynomolgi P. falciparum
RBC preference Reticulocytes Reticulocytes Reticulocytes, normocytes
Invasion receptor DARC* DARC Multiple
Dormant liver phase Yes Yes No
Gametocyte production Early Early Late
Chromosome isochores Yes Yes No
Caveola-vesicle complexes Yes Yes No
Sequestration No? No? Yes
Gametocyte shape Round Round Crescent

NOTE: DARC*: P. vivax can invade both Duffy+ and Duffy erythrocytes in certain areas of the world.2733 An isochore is a region of a genome that displays a nucleotide bias, for example extreme A–T composition. Caveola-vesicle complexes are flask-shaped indentations with vesicles in the parasite-infected erythrocyte membrane. Their function may be related to nutrient transport.

The genomes of P. vivax and P. cynomolgi

There are currently five P. vivax reference genome sequences, generated from isolates adapted to growth in monkey hosts and taken from patients in El Salvador, Brazil, North Korea, India, and Mauritania (Table 2). The Carlton lab led the project to sequence the first reference genome, Salvador I, from a patient in El Salvador, a multi-institution and multi-investigator project that was published in 20088 in conjunction with the first genome of P. knowlesi, a malaria parasite of monkeys known to cause zoonotic infections in humans.9 All Plasmodium species have three genomes, a nuclear genome, a mitochondrial genome, and an apicoplast genome. The P. vivax nuclear genome was revealed to be ~27 megabases (Mb) and ~42% average G–C composition, containing ~ 5400 genes distributed among 14 chromosomes. The distinct isochore structure10 of high G–C content in chromosome internal regions but high A– T content in subtelomeric regions was confirmed. Despite the unknown significance of the isochore structure in P. vivax, 11 genes located in G–C–rich isochores were found to evolve faster than genes in A–T–rich regions.8 A large proportion (77%) of P. vivax genes were found to be orthologous with the genes identified from three other mammalian Plasmodium species (P. falciparum, P. knowlesi, and a species of rodent malaria, P. yoelii yoelii), although ~ 50% of these code for hypothetical proteins with uncharacterized functions.8

Table 2.

Summary of all P. vivax genome-sequencing projects from 2008 to the present.

Strain name Country (no. of isolates) Published date; reference Comments

Five reference genomes:
Salvador I El Salvador 20088 Salvador I was the first reference genome to be sequenced from a patient sample adapted to growth in a monkey.
Brazil I
India VII
Mauritania I
North Korean
Brazil
India
Mauritania
North Korea
201212 Four more reference genomes of monkey-adapted strains were subsequently assembled and annotated.

12 patient genomes:
IQ07 Peru 201045 First patient isolate sequenced.
M08, M19
C08, C15, C127
SA-94, SA-95, SA-96, SA-97, SA-98
Madagascar
Cambodia
Peru
201246

201241
Several more patient isolates sequenced for SNP detection only (i.e., no assembly or annotation)
M15 Madagascar 201337

178 global P. vivax patient samples Brazil (20), Columbia (31), PNG (23), Peru (47), India (9), China (8), Mexico (20), Thailand (20) Unpublished For generation of a global genetic map of P. vivax, including population structure and phylogeography.

Recognizing the limitations of a single genome sequence from one geographical area, we subsequently published whole-genome sequences of four more P. vivax strains from Brazil, India, Mauritania, and North Korea in 2012,12 more than doubling the number of reference genomes for this species and providing further resources for the malaria community. All strains were originally taken from infected patients, but the parasites were adapted to growth in monkeys, so that biological material can be generated and is available in the malaria repository MR4 (http://www.mr4.org). Our major finding from the analysis of these four additional P. vivax genomes with Salvador I and a comparator set of P. falciparum isolates taken from similar regions of the world is that P. vivax displays almost twice as much genetic diversity as P. falciparum in terms of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) diversity and microsatellite and gene family variability.12 This implies that the global population of P. vivax may have a capacity for greater functional variation. Indeed, the most sequence diversity was observed in gene families associated with immune evasion and erythrocyte invasion, suggesting that vaccines targeting polymorphic antigens may encounter an even greater hurdle in eliciting an effective immune response than they do in P. falciparum, where strain-specific immunity has been shown to limit vaccine efficacy.13 The observation of extremely high sequence diversity in P. vivax, combined with its dormant stage in the human host, which provides a hidden reservoir of infections, thus reinforces the long-held belief that vivax malaria will be the more difficult malaria species to eliminate.

P. cynomolgi is a simian parasite that causes malaria in Asian Old World monkeys. It is a sister taxon to P. vivax (Fig. 1), and because it shares many biological and genetic characteristics, it is often referred to as a model system for the study of the human species (Table 1). Until recently, P. cynomolgi had been thought to only infect Asian macaque monkeys naturally, with a few reported cases of laboratory-induced transmission to humans. However, a patient from Malaysia initially diagnosed as infected with P. malariae/P. knowlesi was later confirmed as infected by P. cynomolgi14 in 2011. We published the first genomes of three strains of P. cynomolgi from Malaysia and Cambodia in 2012, and performed comparative genomic analysis with the reference genome of P. vivax and P. knowlesi.15 At ~ 26.3 Mb, the genome is very similar in size to that of P. vivax, and, interestingly, we found that the difference in gene number (~ 5700 genes in P. cynomolgi and ~ 5400 in P. vivax, although the number in the P. vivax genome may be an underestimate due to misassembly) is explainable by copy-number variation in multigene families involved in human immune system evasion and host erythrocyte invasion. Moreover, copy numbers of the genes composing multigene families were generally greater in the P. cynomolgi–P. vivax lineage than in P. knowlesi, suggesting repeated gene duplication in the ancestral lineage of P. cynomolgi and P. vivax (or repeated gene deletion in the P. knowlesi lineage). Thus, it appears that a main difference between the genomes of P. cynomolgi, P. vivax, and P. knowlesi is not due to the presence of species-specific genes but rather variations in the copy number of multigene family members shared across the species.

Whole-genome analysis of the aforementioned P. vivax and P. cynomolgi genomes has allowed us and others to explore the biology of the vivax parasite further, including identification and analysis of important gene families and development of synteny and population genetic maps. A brief description of some of our work in these areas and in the context of research by others is given below.

vir gene family: the largest multigene family of P. vivax

The largest gene family in P. vivax was first identified in a study that sequenced a 155-kb chromosomal region of a P. vivax field isolate.16 Thirty-two members of the vir (variable interspersed repeat) family were identified that could be grouped into six different subfamilies, and in silico analysis of protein structures showed that some vir gene subfamilies shared structural characteristics with P. falciparum SURFIN proteins found on the surface of infected RBCs as well as Pfmc-2tm localized at Maurer’s clefts (single membrane structures in the cytoplasm of RBCs infected by P. falciparum).17 SURFINs may have a role in the invasion of erythrocytes, and Pfmc-2tm may be involved in trafficking of parasite proteins.18 However, the question remained as to how many copies might exist in the whole genome. With the completion of the P. vivax Salvador I reference genome,8 a more complete picture emerged. First, ~350 total vir genes were identified, and clustering analysis revealed several more subfamilies—but many more genes that could not be clustered because of their extensive diversity, including a variable number of 1–5 exons and size range of 156–2316 bp in length. Motif analysis of the genes revealed that only half possess transmembrane domains and only ~ 160 contain a PEXEL-like (Plasmodium export element) motif,8 suggesting that there may be alternative pathways for export of VIR proteins to the erythrocyte surface, and that VIR proteins might have different subcellular localizations and functions.

More recently, we studied the vir gene family in all five P. vivax reference genomes, and, as expected, it was revealed to be highly divergent, with limited overlapping repertoires between strains.12 However, we identified 15 ultra-conserved vir genes that displayed low SNP diversity in all P. vivax genomes, with one locus, PVX_113230, absolutely invariant, with high similarity to the kir gene family in P. knowlesi, and exhibiting conserved synteny in rodent malaria species. These data indicate that PVX_113230 might be the founder gene in P. vivax and may perform its ancestral role, although that role is currently unknown.12 A recent publication used novel computational methods to cluster 295 VIR proteins into 10 subfamilies, and an additional 39 hypothetical proteins were predicted to be new VIR proteins by applying this new computational approach.19

Expansion of RBP gene family in P. vivax

One family of Plasmodium parasite ligands that facilitates RBC invasion is the reticulocyte binding-like (RBL) superfamily, which functions by binding to reticulocyte receptors with high affinity.20 RBL proteins are large, ranging in size from 230–350 kDa,21 and localize to merozoites (the form of the parasite that invades RBCs).21,22 Members of the RBL superfamily have a conserved two-exon gene structure, with the first exon encoding a signal peptide and a large second exon coding the remainder of the protein sequence.21 Regardless of these similarities, RBLs have different preferences for RBCs during invasion in different Plasmodium species. Reticulocyte-binding proteins (RBPs), members of the RBL superfamily in P. cynomolgi and P. vivax, are proposed to specifically recognize the reticulocyte subpopulation of RBCs during the invasion process.22

RBPs in P. vivax are promising candidates for development of vaccines blocking receptor–ligand interactions.23 However, the sequence polymorphism of rbp genes may hinder the effectiveness of such vaccines;24 thus, unraveling genetic diversity in rbp genes in P. vivax is a crucial step for successful development of erythrocytic-stage vaccines. In 1992, two genes coding for RBPs, rbp1 and rbp2, were identified in P. vivax,22 giving rise to the assumption that P. vivax has an uncomplicated erythrocyte-invasion pathway compared to P. falciparum. However, analysis of the first P. vivax genome sequence identified ten rbp copies, including three fragmented genes and two pseudogenes, suggesting that P. vivax may have alternative pathways of RBC invasion.8 Although functional genomic studies have yet to be performed, a more recent validation of the multi-copy nature of this gene family has come in the form of phylogenetic analysis of the genome sequences generated from three strains of P. cynomolgi.15 This showed that rbl genes from P. cynomolgi, P. vivax, and P. knowlesi can be classified into three distinct groups, RBP1, RBP2, and RBP3, on the basis of sequence similarity. All three groups of RBPs are represented in the closely related monkey species P. cynomolgi, whereas P. vivax and P. knowlesi lack functional genes from the RBP3 and RBP1 groups, respectively. Thus, rbl gene family expansion seems to have occurred after speciation, indicating that the three species may have multiple species-specific erythrocyte-invasion mechanisms.

One final interesting analysis facilitated by the availability of these several P. vivax and P. cynomolgi genomes was identification of copy-number variants (CNVs) of an rbp gene between strains of a single Plasmodium species. An ortholog of the P. vivax rbp1b gene is present in one P. cynomolgi strain, Berok, but absent in two strains, B and Cambodian.15 As noted by the authors, the repeated birth and death of rbp genes, a signature of adaptive evolution, may allow malaria parasites to switch between monkey and human hosts.

The Duffy binding protein gene family

Another family of invasion ligands that bind RBCs during invasion is the erythrocyte binding-like (EBL) superfamily. Members of the EBL superfamily share similar features, including an N-terminal signal sequence, a large extracellular segment followed by a transmembrane domain, and a C-terminal cytoplasmic domain. Members of the EBL superfamily in P. cynomolgi and P. vivax are called Duffy binding proteins (DBPs), and are exported to the merozoite surface where they bind to the host receptor Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC).2527 Erythrocyte invasion by P. vivax is restricted by the interaction between DBPs and DARC receptors, because Duffy people were shown to be resistant to infection by P. vivax.28,29 However, recently P. vivax infections in Duffy individuals have been found in several countries in Africa3034 and Brazil,35 although the highest prevalence of such cases remains in Madagascar.36 Sequencing the P. vivax and P. cynomolgi reference genomes confirmed the presence of one DBP gene in P. vivax and two in P. cynomolgi;8,12,15 unlike the RBPs, diversity is relatively conserved in the DBP genes. However, a recent study identified a tandem duplication of the dbp gene in whole-genome data from P. vivax field isolates from Madagascar.37 The duplication was extremely prevalent in the patients, suggesting that P. vivax may somehow overcome the barrier to infection presented by Duffy negativity through the duplication of the dbp gene. Moreover, the highly conserved nature of the dbp duplication in these patients indicated that it was a recent event. More studies are required to determine how much of a global phenomenon vivax infection of Duffy individuals is, and how much of a threat it may be to control of the species.

Whole-genome alignment and synteny maps

With the availability of several whole-genome sequences of Plasmodium, we have been able to generate genome-wide alignment and synteny maps for comparative studies of the species. Synteny is the conservation of the order and orientation of genes between genomes of different species, and synteny maps have various uses including (1) identifying orthologs through position when sequence similarity is low; (2) plotting regions of the genome that have evolved differently; (3) identifying regions of a genome that may be co-regulated; (4) inferring the evolution of the genus through tracking chromosomal rearrangements; and (5) identification of conserved non-coding regions in the Plasmodium genome. The first genome-wide synteny map between P. falciparum and P. y. yoelii was published as part of the P. falciparum genome paper, and revealed long tracts of genes conserved in synteny between the two distantly related species.38 After generation of more reference genomes, we developed a synteny map of six Plasmodium species (P. vivax, P. falciparum, P. y. yoelii, P. knowlesi, and two species of rodent malaria parasites, Plasmodium chabaudi and Plasmodium berghei).8 Of the ~ 3300 orthologs on the map between all six species, 99% were found to be positionally conserved. In addition, it was possible to reconstruct the ancestral karyotype of the six species, which turned out to correspond to the karyotypes of P. vivax and P. knowlesi; the karyotypes of P. falciparum and the rodent malaria parasites can be reconstructed from this form through nine and six chromosomal rearrangements, respectively. No synteny breakage hot-spots were identified, indicating that intersyntenic breakpoints were unique during the divergence of the species. More recently, the synteny map was expanded to include P. cynomolgi.15 Not unexpectedly for species from the same monkey malaria clade, gene synteny along the 14 chromosomes of P. knowlesi, P. vivax, and P. cynomolgi is highly conserved, although numerous microsyntenic breaks are present in regions containing multigene families. The map also identified two apparent errors in existing public sequence databases: an inversion in chromosome 3 of P. knowlesi and an inversion in chromosome 6 of P. vivax. This underlies the importance of such maps for assembly and annotation checking (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Genome synteny between representative species of three lineages of the Plasmodium parasite. Protein coding genes of P. knowlesi, representative of species of the monkey malaria clade, are shown aligned with those of P. falciparum, and P. berghei as a representative of the rodent malaria clade. Chromosomes 1 through 14 are shown at the top, and conserved protein coding genes between the genomes are colored in order from red (5′-end of chromosome 1) to blue (3′-end of chromosome 14). An approximate scale in megabases is shown in the middle panel. Such synteny maps can reveal how chromosomes evolved from the first Plasmodium ancestor into the current karyotypes of extant malaria parasite species. Adapted from Ref. 15.

Importantly, alignment of whole P. vivax, P. knowlesi, and P. cynomolgi genomes has enabled calculation of key evolutionary parameters, enabling genes to be classified based on their mode of evolution. For example, analysis of ~ 3300 high-quality P. vivax/P. knowlesi orthologs enabled determination of maximum likelihood estimates of the rate of substitution at synonymous (dS) and non-synonymous (dN) sites, as well as ω(dN/dS).8 P. vivax chromosomes were found to differ significantly in their average values for both dS and dN, but the two variables are strongly correlated within and between chromosomes, and the existence of heterogeneous mutation rates across the genome is also suggested. The degree of selective constraint has also shown to vary across classes of Plasmodium genes. Genes encoding glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins, cell adhesion proteins, proteins predicted to be exported, and proteins with transmembrane or signal peptide motifs (i.e., extracellular proteins) have been found to evolve significantly faster than genes involved in housekeeping functions. Thus, the host immune system appears to have strongly influenced evolutionary rate variation between gene classes in Plasmodium by targeting extracellular proteins.

Similarly, selective constraint analysis within P. cynomolgi and between P. vivax and P. cynomolgi revealed some interesting findings.15 Approximately 60 genes with dN > dS, and ~ 3200 genes with dS > dN, from ~ 4000 pairs of orthologs between two P. cynomolgi strains were identified, providing clues as to the types of genes subject to different selective pressures in the species. Similarly, whether P. cynomolgi is a good model system for P. vivax was investigated by exploring the degree to which evolution of orthologs between the two species had been constrained over evolutionary time. Of ~ 4600 pairs of orthologs analyzed between the two species, less than 2% were found to be under positive selection (i.e., evolving quickly), and at least 81% to be under strong functional constraint (i.e., evolving slowly), indicating that the genome of P. cynomolgi is highly conserved with P. vivax and emphasizing the value of the monkey malaria species as a biomedical and evolutionary model for studying P. vivax.

Future directions

So what is next for whole-genome sequencing studies of P. vivax? We are currently leading a project to sequence ~ 180 P. vivax clinical samples collected from diverse geographic regions, many of which have been collected as part of the National Institutes of Health–funded International Centers of Excellence in Malaria Research initiative39 (Table 2). The genomes are being sequenced at New York University and the Broad Institute using a combination of hybrid selection40 and next-generation sequencing. The inability to easily obtain large amount of host-free DNA has hindered the genome-sequencing projects for P. vivax, and so by using a host-depletion method of hybrid selection, parasite DNA in clinical samples can be enriched as much as 40-fold, reducing the cost associated with generating sufficient parasite coverage for variant discovery or genome assembly. Analyzing the sequences of these global isolates will greatly advance our knowledge of the global genetic diversity and population genetics of P. vivax and the species’ phylogeography, and will enable examination of the evolution of its genome in contrasting regions of the world. Genomic studies in other labs are also pushing the boundaries of our knowledge of P. vivax. For example, whole-genome sequencing studies of successive relapses in a single patient have shown that genetically related parasites can cause both short and long latency relapses,41 and may provide a method of differentiating between recrudescence, relapse, and re-infection in a patient. Several labs are developing genomic technologies and computational approaches to determine within-host diversity of P. vivax infections, and thus permit rapid diagnosis of, for example, drug resistance phenotypes.42 Finally, whole-genome sequencing of additional species of non-human malaria species,43 including those in the monkey malaria clade, will provide evolutionary context and comparative data for deeper studies into the fascinating biology of P. vivax.

Conclusion

P. vivax is particularly suited to interrogation by genomic technologies because the lack of a long-term in vitro culture system makes it difficult to study in a laboratory setting. The generation of five P. vivax reference assemblies and genome data from several patient isolates has dramatically increased our understanding of the genetic diversity and population genetics of this species. Whole-genome sequencing of several P. cynomolgi (a sister taxon to P. vivax) strains has also significantly advanced our knowledge of the biology and evolutionary history of the monkey malaria clade. We look forward to the release of hundreds of P. vivax whole-genome sequences isolated from patients throughout the world in the coming years, both from our own studies as well as from others, enabling real-time epidemiology and population genomic studies of extant parasites and leading to the development of better methods of malaria control.

Acknowledgments

ZL is supported by the MacCracken Program in the Graduate School of Arts and Science at New York University (New York, NY). This work was supported by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH) International Centers of Excellence in Malaria Research Grant U19AI089676. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Martinsen ES, Perkins SL. The Diversity of Plasmodium and other Haemosporidians: The Intersection of Taxonomy, Phlygenetics and Genomics. Caister Academic Press; Norfolk, UK: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO. World Malaria Report 2013 2013 [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gething PW, et al. A long neglected world malaria map: Plasmodium vivax endemicity in 2010. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rahimi BA, et al. Severe vivax malaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies since 1900. Malaria journal. 2014;13:481. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carlton JM, Das A, Escalante AA. Genomics, population genetics and evolutionary history of Plasmodium vivax. Adv Parasitol. 2013;81:203–222. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-407826-0.00005-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu W, et al. African origin of the malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax. Nature communications. 2014;5:3346. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Noulin F, et al. 1912–2012: a century of research on Plasmodium vivax in vitro culture. Trends in parasitology. 2013;29:286–294. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2013.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Carlton JM, et al. Comparative genomics of the neglected human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax. Nature. 2008;455:757–763. doi: 10.1038/nature07327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pain A, et al. The genome of the simian and human malaria parasite Plasmodium knowlesi. Nature. 2008;455:799–803. doi: 10.1038/nature07306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McCutchan TF, et al. Evolutionary Relatedness of Plasmodium Species as Determined by the Structure of DNA. Science. 1984;225:808–811. doi: 10.1126/science.6382604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Carlton J. The Plasmodium vivax genome sequencing project. Trends in parasitology. 2003;19:227–231. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(03)00066-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Neafsey DE, et al. The malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax exhibits greater genetic diversity than Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Genet. 2012;44:1046–1050. doi: 10.1038/ng.2373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ellis RD, et al. Blood stage vaccines for Plasmodium falciparum. Human Vaccines. 2014;6:627–634. doi: 10.4161/hv.6.8.11446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ta TH, et al. First case of a naturally acquired human infection with Plasmodium cynomolgi. Malaria journal. 2014;13:68. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tachibana S, et al. Plasmodium cynomolgi genome sequences provide insight into Plasmodium vivax and the monkey malaria clade. Nat Genet. 2012;44:1051–1055. doi: 10.1038/ng.2375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.del Portillo HA, et al. A superfamily of variant genes encoded in the subtelomeric region of Plasmodium vivax. Nature. 2001;410:839–842. doi: 10.1038/35071118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Merino EF, et al. Multi-character population study of the vir subtelomeric multigene superfamily of Plasmodium vivax, a major human malaria parasite. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2006;149:10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2006.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Frech C, Chen N. Variant surface antigens of malaria parasites: functional and evolutionary insights from comparative gene family classification and analysis. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:427. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lopez FJ, et al. A new computational approach redefines the subtelomeric vir superfamily of Plasmodium vivax. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Okenu DM, et al. The reticulocyte binding proteins of Plasmodium cynomolgi: a model system for studies of P. vivax. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2005;143:116–120. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2005.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rayner JC, et al. Rapid evolution of an erythrocyte invasion gene family: the Plasmodium reichenowi Reticulocyte Binding Like (RBL) genes. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. 2004;133:287–296. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2003.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Galinski MR, et al. A Reticulocyte-Binding Protein Complex of Plasmodium vivax Merozoites. Cell. 1992;69:1213–1226. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90642-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Galinski MR, Barnwell JW. Plasmodium vivax Merozoites, Invasion of Reticulocytes and Considerations for Malaria Vaccine Development. Parasitology Today. 1996;12:20–29. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(96)80641-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rayner JC, et al. Dramatic difference in diversity between Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax reticulocyte binding-like genes. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2005;72:666–674. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Adams JH, et al. The Duffy Receptor Family of Plasmodium knowelsi is located within the micronemes of invasive malaria merozoites. Cell. 1990;63:141–153. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90295-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Adams JH, et al. A family of erythrocyte binding proteins of malaria parasites. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1992;89:7085–7089. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.15.7085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Batchelor JD, Zahm JA, Tolia NH. Dimerization of Plasmodium vivax DBP is induced upon receptor binding and drives recognition of DARC. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18:908–914. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Miller LH, et al. The resistance factor to Plasmodium vivax in blacks. The Duffy-blood-group genotype, FyFy. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1976;295:302–304. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197608052950602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Miller LH, et al. Erythrocyte receptors for (Plasmodium knowlesi) malaria: Duffy blood group determinants. Science. 1975;189:561–563. doi: 10.1126/science.1145213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Culleton R, et al. Evidence for the transmission of Plasmodium vivax in the Republic of the Congo, West Central Africa. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:1465–1469. doi: 10.1086/644510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Mendes C, et al. Duffy negative antigen is no longer a barrier to Plasmodium vivax–molecular evidences from the African West Coast (Angola and Equatorial Guinea) PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ryan JR, et al. Evidence for transmission of Plasmodium vivax among a Duffy antigen negative population in western Kenya. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2006;75:575–581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Woldearegai TG, et al. Plasmodium vivax malaria in Duffy-negative individuals from Ethiopia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2013;107:328–331. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trt016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wurtz N, et al. Vivax malaria in Mauritania includes infection of a Duffy-negative individual. Malaria journal. 2011;10:336–343. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cavasini CE, et al. Duffy blood group gene polymorphisms among malaria vivax patients in four areas of the Brazilian Amazon region. Malaria journal. 2007;6:167. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-6-167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Menard D, et al. Plasmodium vivax clinical malaria is commonly observed in Duffy-negative Malagasy people. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:5967–5971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912496107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Menard D, et al. Whole genome sequencing of field isolates reveals a common duplication of the Duffy binding protein gene in Malagasy Plasmodium vivax strains. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Carlton JM, et al. Genome sequence and comparative analysis of the model rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium yoelii yoelii. Nature. 2002;419:512–519. doi: 10.1038/nature01099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rao M. Foreword. The international centers of excellence for malaria research. Acta tropica. 2012;121:157. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Melnikov A, et al. Hybrid selection for sequencing pathogen genomes from clinical samples. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R73. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-8-r73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bright AT, et al. Whole genome sequencing analysis of Plasmodium vivax using whole genome capture. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:262. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mideo N, et al. Ahead of the curve: next generation estimators of drug resistance in malaria infections. Trends in parasitology. 2013;29:321–328. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2013.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Otto TD, et al. Genome sequencing of chimpanzee malaria parasites reveals possible pathways of adaptation to human hosts. Nature communications. 2014;5:4754. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Duval L, et al. African apes as reservoirs of Plasmodium falciparum and the origin and diversification of the Laverania subgenus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:10561–10566. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005435107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dharia NV, et al. Whole-genome sequencing and microarray analysis of ex vivo Plasmodium vivax reveal selective pressure on putative drug resistance genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:20045–20050. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1003776107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chan ER, et al. Whole genome sequencing of field isolates provides robust characterization of genetic diversity in Plasmodium vivax. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES