Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1980 Aug;66(2):261–266. doi: 10.1104/pp.66.2.261

Amino Acid Transport in Suspension-cultured Plant Cells

II. CHARACTERIZATION OF l-LEUCINE UPTAKE 1

Merrill S Blackman 1, Carl N McDaniel 1,2
PMCID: PMC440579  PMID: 16661418

Abstract

l-Leucine (l-Leu) transport into suspension cultured Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Wisconsin 38 cells has been investigated. Cells were batch-cultured and routinely assayed 3.5 to 4 days after subculturing. Uptake rates were measured over the concentration range of 10 micromolar to 150 millimolar. Kinetic analysis of the uptake rates indicated that uptake was multiphasic with three saturable phases and one unsaturable phase. The three saturable phases which occur in the concentration ranges of 10 to 40 micromolar, 50 to 100 micromolar, and 0.2 to 5.0 millimolar exhibited the following characteristics; (a) phases were energy-dependent as shown by 84 to 94% inhibition of uptake rates by metabolic inhibitors; (b) phases exhibited broad pH optima between 3.0 and 5.5; (c) phases showed stereospecificity for l-Leu; (d) over a 12-hour incubation period, phases concentrated l-Leu 43, 90, and 10 times when the initial l-Leu concentration was 20 micromolar, 100 micromolar, and 1.0 millimolar, respectively; (e) phases had Km values of 17.6 micromolar, 60.1 micromolar, and 1.38 millimolar, respectively; and (f) in the temperature range of 17 to 27 C phases had Q10 values of 2.1, 1.4, and 1.4, respectively. l-Leu uptake in the three saturable phases was inhibited by a 20-fold higher concentration of 18 other amino acids; phenylalanine, alanine, and methionine were the most effective inhibitors, whereas aspartic acid, asparagine, histidine, and arginine were the least effective. The nonsaturable phase which was responsible for increases in the uptake rate above 5.0 mm appeared to be primarily diffusional since it was minimally influenced by metabolic inhibitors and had a Q10 of 1.3.

Full text

PDF
261

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BIRT L. M., HIRD F. J. The uptake of amino acids by carrot slices. Biochem J. 1956 Oct;64(2):305–311. doi: 10.1042/bj0640305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berlin J., Widholm J. M. Amino acid uptake by amino acid analog resistant tobacco cell lines. Z Naturforsch C. 1978 Sep-Oct;33(9-10):634–640. doi: 10.1515/znc-1978-9-1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlson P. S. Methionine sulfoximine--resistant mutants of tobacco. Science. 1973 Jun 29;180(4093):1366–1368. doi: 10.1126/science.180.4093.1366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheruel J., Jullien M. Amino Acid Uptake into Cultivated Mesophyll Cells from Asparagus officinalis L. Plant Physiol. 1979 Apr;63(4):621–626. doi: 10.1104/pp.63.4.621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harrington H. M., Smith I. K. Cysteine transport into cultured tobacco cells. Plant Physiol. 1977 Dec;60(6):807–811. doi: 10.1104/pp.60.6.807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Servaites J. C., Schrader L. E., Jung D. M. Energy-dependent Loading of Amino Acids and Sucrose into the Phloem of Soybean. Plant Physiol. 1979 Oct;64(4):546–550. doi: 10.1104/pp.64.4.546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Smith I. K. Role of calcium in serine transport into tobacco cells. Plant Physiol. 1978 Dec;62(6):941–948. doi: 10.1104/pp.62.6.941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stewart C. R. Some characteristics of the uptake of glutamine by corn scutellum. Plant Physiol. 1971 Jan;47(1):157–161. doi: 10.1104/pp.47.1.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vasil V., Hildebrandt A. C. Differentiation of Tobacco Plants from Single, Isolated Cells in Microcultures. Science. 1965 Nov 12;150(3698):889–892. doi: 10.1126/science.150.3698.889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES