Skip to main content
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1980 Aug;66(2):276–280. doi: 10.1104/pp.66.2.276

Endorhizal and Exorhizal Acetylene-reducing Activity in a Grass (Spartina alterniflora Loisel.)-Diazotroph Association 1

C David Boyle 1, David G Patriquin 1
PMCID: PMC440582  PMID: 16661421

Abstract

Earlier studies indicated that bacteria responsible for nitrogenase activity of some grasses are located inside the roots. Those studies were conducted with excised roots in which a long, unexplained “lag phase” occurred before initiation of nitrogenase activity. When hydroponically maintained Spartina alterniflora Loisel. was incubated in a two-compartment system with acetylene, ethylene was produced following, at most, a 2-hour lag in both the upper (shoot) and lower (roots + water) phases. Ethylene production in the upper phase not attributable to leaf-associated acetylene-reducing activity or to diffusion of ethylene from around the roots is considered to represent “endorhizal acetylene-reducing activity,” the internally produced ethylene diffusing into the upper phase via the lacunae. Ethylene produced in the lower phase is designated “exorhizal acetylene-reducing activity.” The endorhizal acetylene-reducing activity, in comparison to exorhizal activity, was relatively insensitive to additions of HgCl2, NH4Cl, or carbon sources to the lower phase. Post-lag acetylene-reducing activity of roots excised from plants growing in soil responded to additions in a manner similar to that of endorhizal acetylene-reducing activity, whereas post-lag acetylene-reducing activity of rhizosphere soil responded in a manner similar to that of exorhizal acetylene-reducing activity.

Full text

PDF
276

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Evans H. J., Barber L. E. Biological nitrogen fixation for food and fiber production. Science. 1977 Jul 22;197(4301):332–339. doi: 10.1126/science.197.4301.332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Flett R. J., Hamilton R. D., Campbell N. E. Aquatic acetylene-reduction techniques: solutions to several problems. Can J Microbiol. 1976 Jan;22(1):43–51. doi: 10.1139/m76-006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hardy R. W., Holsten R. D., Jackson E. K., Burns R. C. The acetylene-ethylene assay for n(2) fixation: laboratory and field evaluation. Plant Physiol. 1968 Aug;43(8):1185–1207. doi: 10.1104/pp.43.8.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Patriquin D. G., Döbereiner J. Light microscopy observations of tetrazolium-reducing bacteria in the endorhizosphere of maize and other grasses in Brazil. Can J Microbiol. 1978 Jun;24(6):734–742. doi: 10.1139/m78-122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Von Bülow J. F., Döbereiner J. Potential for nitrogen fixation in maize genotypes in Brazil. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jun;72(6):2389–2393. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.6.2389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. deBont J. A. Bacterial degradation of ethylene and the acetylene reduction test. Can J Microbiol. 1976 Jul;22(7):1060–1062. doi: 10.1139/m76-155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES