Skip to main content
Aging Cell logoLink to Aging Cell
. 2015 Feb 9;14(3):491–495. doi: 10.1111/acel.12325

Accelerated epigenetic aging in Down syndrome

Steve Horvath 1,2,*,, Paolo Garagnani 3,4,5,*, Maria Giulia Bacalini 3,4,6, Chiara Pirazzini 3,4, Stefano Salvioli 3,4, Davide Gentilini 7, Anna Maria Di Blasio 7, Cristina Giuliani 8, Spencer Tung 9, Harry V Vinters 9, Claudio Franceschi 4,10
PMCID: PMC4406678  PMID: 25678027

Abstract

Down Syndrome (DS) entails an increased risk of many chronic diseases that are typically associated with older age. The clinical manifestations of accelerated aging suggest that trisomy 21 increases the biological age of tissues, but molecular evidence for this hypothesis has been sparse. Here, we utilize a quantitative molecular marker of aging (known as the epigenetic clock) to demonstrate that trisomy 21 significantly increases the age of blood and brain tissue (on average by 6.6 years, = 7.0 × 10−14).

Keywords: biomarker of aging, DNA methylation, Down syndrome, epigenetics

Introduction

Down Syndrome (DS) is a genetic disorder caused by the presence of all or part of a third copy of chromosome 21 (trisomy 21; +21). It is not only associated with intellectual disability but also with a group of clinical manifestations of ‘accelerated aging’ (Devenny et al., 2005; Patterson & Cabelof, 2012; Moran, 2013). Adults with DS have a specific list of conditions with accelerated age at onset, including premature skin wrinkling, greying of hair, hypogonadism, early menopause, hypothyroidism, declining immune function, and Alzheimer's disease. However, as recently reviewed (Zigman, 2013), accelerated aging in DS is atypical and segmental, involving some but not all organs and tissues. Of particular interest are the brain (Lott & Head, 2005; Teipel & Hampel, 2006) and the immune system (Cuadrado & Barrena, 1996). Certain functional abnormalities of lymphocytes can be interpreted as precocious immunosenescence (Kusters et al., 2011) but alternative interpretations are possible (Cuadrado & Barrena, 1996).

Due to the limited availability of biomarkers of aging, it has been difficult to rigorously test whether DS is associated with accelerated aging effects, per se, versus specific vulnerabilities to conditions typically associated with old age (e.g., increased risk for Alzheimer's disease). One basic tenet is that a suitable biomarker of aging should detect accelerated aging effects in tissues (e.g., brain and blood) that exhibit clinical manifestations of accelerated aging in DS subjects.

Telomere length can be used as a molecular aging marker and (Vaziri et al., 1993) reported that DS cases exhibited shorter leukocyte telomere length (LTL) than control subjects, with more recent data suggesting that shorter telomere length is associated with the presence of both dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults with DS (Jenkins et al., 2008). However, one study found no evidence that cultured skin fibroblasts from DS subjects attained replicative senescence (a telomere length-dependent phenomenon) earlier than those from controls (Kimura et al., 2005).

Here, we study a new type of molecular marker of aging, our recently developed ‘epigenetic clock’, which is based on DNA methylation (DNAm) levels (Horvath, 2013). The epigenetic clock has several advantages over other methods. It is quantitative, it overcomes the technical difficulties that plague telomere length measurements and is applicable in all types and sources of tissues, importantly including cryopreserved banked specimens (Horvath, 2013). This epigenetic clock, which we defined by studying DNAm in series of human tissues across a range of chronological ages, is a prediction method of chronological age based on the DNAm levels of 353 specific CpGs. In normal individuals, the predicted (estimated) age is referred to as DNAm age. DNAm age is highly correlated with chronological age across sorted cell types (CD4 T cells, monocytes, neurons), complex tissues (e.g., blood, brain, liver) (Horvath, 2013; Horvath et al., 2014). The epigenetic clock can be applied to two commercially standardized methylation platforms: the Illumina 450K and the 27K arrays.

Our 4 DNAm data sets are described in Table1 and in the Methods. DNA methylation levels were assessed in peripheral blood leukocytes (data set 1; 27K array), various brain regions (from DS subjects, Alzheimer's disease subjects and controls, data set 2; 450K array), whole blood (data set 3; 450K array) and buccal epithelium (data set 4; 27K arrays).

Table 1.

Overview of the DNA methylation data sets

Tissue source Platform N (total) Perc. female, % N (DS) Mean Age (range) GEO ID Citation P-value
1. Leukocytes 27K 56 70 35 43 (22, 64) GSE25395 Kerkel et al. (2010) 0.0048
2. Brain 450K 71 47 15 53 (32, 64) GSE63347 Current article 5.5E-7
3. Whole blood 27K 87 63 29 33 (9,83) GSE52588 Current article 0.00056
4. Buccal epithelium 27K 20 50 10 34 (27, 47) GSE50586 Jones et al. (2013b) 0.26

The rows correspond to the data sets used in this article. Columns report the tissue source, DNAm platform, total number of samples (N), percent female, number of DS samples, mean age (and range, i.e., minimum age, maximum age), data access information, and citation. The last column reports a (Kruskal–Wallis test) P-value regarding the relationship between age acceleration and DS status. Additional details can be found in the Supporting Information.

As expected, DNAm age has a strong positive correlation with chronological age in the control samples (0.74 < r < 0.95, Fig.1ad). Therefore, we were able to define a measure of age acceleration as the residual resulting from a linear model that regressed DNAm age on chronological age in controls. By construction, this measure of age acceleration is not correlated with chronological age and takes on a positive value for samples whose DNAm age is higher than expected.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Analysis of 4 independent Down syndrome data sets. Each column corresponds to a different data set. The top row (a–d) shows scatter plots between chronological age (x-axis) and DNAm age (y-axis) in the 4 independent data sets. Red circles indicate DS, blue circles indicate Alzheimer's disease, and black squares denote control subjects. The orange line corresponds to a regression line through DS subjects. The black line in the upper panels indicates the regression line through the remaining (control) samples. The age acceleration effect for each subject (point) corresponds to the vertical distance to the black regression line. While DNAm age is highly correlated with chronological age, red points tend to lie above the black line, which indicates that DS subjects exhibit accelerated aging effects. The bottom row (e–h) show how mean age acceleration (y-axis) relates to DS status. By definition, the mean age acceleration measure in controls is zero. The title of the bar plots also reports a P-value from a nonparametric group comparison test (Kruskal Wallis test). Each bar plot reports 1 SE.

Strikingly, we find that DS subjects exhibit a highly significant age acceleration effect in three independent data sets (P = 0.0048, P = 5.5×10-7, P = 0.00056 Fig.1eg) involving blood and brain tissue. By contrast, we did not observe a significant age acceleration effect in buccal epithelium (P = 0.26, Fig.1h) which might reflect that clinical manifestations of accelerated aging have not been observed in this tissue. However, we caution the reader that data set 4 only involved 10 cases and 10 controls. Larger studies may succeed at detecting an accelerated aging effect in buccal epithelium.

A meta-analysis applied to the blood and brain data sets shows that DS status is highly significantly (P = 7.0 × 10−14) associated with increased DNAm age (average 6.6 years, Table2).

Table 2.

Estimation of the influence of DS on DNAm age

Variable Data set 1 Data set 2 Data set 3 Data set 4
Leukocytes Brain Whole blood Buccal Epithel.
Estimate (SE) P Estimate (SE) P Estimate (SE) P Estimate (SE) P
Chronological age 0.95374 (0.06191) <2 × 10−16 0.74144 (0.0565) <2 × 10−16 0.79168 (0.02865) <2 × 10−16 0.9452 (0.1449) 5.2 × 10−6
DS 3.74593 (1.37252) 8.6 × 10−3 8.53045 (1.23934) 2.3 × 10−9 3.65564 (1.08842) 1.2 × 10−3 2.6495 (1.7776) 0.15
R-squared 0.83 0.73 0.92 0.72
Age accel. for DS 3.9 years 11.5 years 4.6 years 2.8 years

Using a multivariate regression model DNAm age is regressed on chronological age and DS status. The table reports estimates of the regression coefficients and corresponding standard errors, Wald test P-values. The last row reports the age acceleration associated with DS status. For example DS status is associated with an increase of 3.9 years (=3.74593/0.95374) in the first data set. The results for data sets 1–3 are largely unchanged after including blood cell type abundance measures as additional covariates (Table s1).

Data set 2 shows that the brain tissue of DS subjects exhibits significantly higher age acceleration than that of AD subjects or controls (Fig.1f). These results can also be found when restricting attention to samples from the cerebellum, frontal lobe, or other brain regions (Fig. s1).

Data set 3 involved blood from 29 individuals with DS, their mothers and their unaffected siblings. This design allows adjustment for possible confounding effects on DNA methylation patterns deriving from genetic and environmental (lifestyle) factors within families. To properly account for the family relationships, we also fit a mixed effects model to the 29 discordant sib pairs. Specifically, DNAm age was regressed on DS status, chronological age, and a random effects term (intercept) that encoded the sib ship. Using this model, we found that DS status significantly affected DNAm age (P = 0.00029), raising it by 3.86 years ± 1.03 (SE).

Additional analyses examined potential confounders of gender and mean methylation levels. None of these factors contributed significantly to the effect of DS on DNAm age (e.g., Figs S2 and S3, Data S1).

Several studies reported age-dependent defects in the innate and in the adaptive immune system of DS (Kusters et al., 2011), consisting in altered prevalence of the different lymphocyte subpopulations. In data sets 1, DS status is not significantly associated with blood cell type proportions (Fig. s4mr). But using the discordant sib pair data from data set 3, we observe that DS subjects exhibit fewer CD4 T cells and B cells (Fig. s5n,p) and more Natural Killer cells (Fig. s5o). Considering that DNA methylation is cell type specific, differences in blood cell counts could confound the relationship between DS status and age acceleration effects. While no significant correlation can be found between proportions of blood cell types and age acceleration in data set 1 (Fig. s4af), we observe a significant negative correlation for CD4 T cells (Fig. s5b) and monocytes (Fig. s5e). But differences in blood cell counts do not explain the observed age acceleration effects as can be seen from the fact that DS status remains a significant predictor of DNAm age in a multivariate regression model that includes blood cell counts and chronological age (Table s1). Similarly, the results remain significant (Table s2) when using a ‘reference free’ method that does not require reference libraries of cell types (Houseman et al., 2014). Further, a structural equation model analysis shows that causal models that posit that changes in blood cell type abundance mediate the effect of DS on age acceleration do not fit our data (Table s3).

Our observed results regarding the relationship between DS status and epigenetic age acceleration do not depend on any particular choice of aging signature (Fig. s6). In particular, they can also be found using an alternative age predictor described in (Hannum et al., 2013), and using aging signatures from (Teschendorff et al., 2010) and (Horvath et al., 2012).

A marginal analysis that related individual CpGs to age, acceleration, and DS status can be found in Figs S710 and 2. As the epigenetic clock was constructed as a multivariate predictor, it is not surprising that most of the 353 clock CpGs do not exhibit a consistent age correlation across data sets (Fig. s7ac). These results demonstrate that the total (epigenetic clock) is more than the sum of its parts. The marginal association of CpGs with epigenetic age acceleration is only moderately (r = 0.41) preserved between data sets 1 and 2 (Fig. s7df). Similarly, marginal associations with DS status are moderately preserved across the blood and brain data sets (Fig. s8ac, ef).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

CpGs that relate to DS status tend to be correlated with age acceleration. (a–c) Results for data sets 1–3, respectively. d) Results of a meta-analysis (Supplementary Information). Each x-axis reports the marginal association with epigenetic age acceleration (as detailed in Supplementary Information and Fig. s7). The sign of the log (base 10) transformed P-value was chosen so that a positive (negative) value indicates that the CpG has a positive (negative) correlation with age acceleration. Each y-axis reports the marginal association with DS status (as detailed in Fig. s8). The sign of the log-transformed P-value was defined such that a positive value indicates that the CpG is hypermethylated in DS subjects. The 353 clock CpGs are colored according to their age correlation in the original training data set from (Horvath, 2013): red and blue for clock CpGs that have a positive and negative age correlation, respectively. The red horizontal and vertical lines correspond to an uncorrected P-value threshold of 0.05.

Strikingly, CpGs that are associated with DS status tend to be correlated with epigenetic age acceleration (Fig.2). For example, we present CpGs that are hypermethylated in DS subjects and have a positive correlation with age acceleration in Fig. s9. These two CpGs correspond to the two magenta triangles in the upper right hand corner of Fig.2d. It is noteworthy that CpG cg12186917 is located on chromosome 21 (near gene CRYZL1). The other CpG cg04455759 is close to gene MRPL42 (mitochondrial ribosomal protein L42) on chromosome 12. We also present two CpGs that are both hypomethylated in DS subjects and have a negative correlation with age acceleration (Fig. s10). These CpGs correspond to the green triangles in the lower left corner of Fig.2d. CpG cg11678767 is located near COL4A6 (type IV alpha 6 collagen isoform A precursor) on the X chromosome, whereas CpG cg20425293 is located near gene SDHD (succinate dehydrogenase complex; subunit D precursor) on chromosome 11. Results for individual CpGs can be found in the Supporting File. A detailed marginal analysis is beyond our scope but we briefly point out that it is already known that DS does not affect global methylation levels in blood (Kerkel et al., 2010) or buccal epithelium (Jones et al., 2013a).

Due to a lack of transcriptional data, we could not directly correlate epigenetic age acceleration with gene expression levels in this study. Several studies have looked at altered gene expression levels in DS subjects, for example, (Esposito et al., 2008; Costa et al., 2011; Letourneau et al., 2014). (Letourneau et al., 2014) showed that the nuclear compartments of trisomic cells undergo modifications of the chromatin environment influencing the overall transcriptome.

To the best of our knowledge, the epigenetic clock approach facilitated the first analysis of DS on age-related epigenetic modifications. Our results indicate that DS can be interpreted as segmental progeria, which affects at least two disparate tissues. As it is well known that DS is associated with clinical manifestations of premature aging in brain and to a lesser extent in blood tissue, it is reassuring that we observe significant age acceleration effects in brain (11 years) and blood (4 years) tissue. Future studies should evaluate whether the extent of epigenetic age acceleration relates to the prevalence of age-related conditions across tissues.

Acknowledgments

All data presented in this article are publicly available in Gene Expression Omnibus. Accession numbers are presented in Table1. The authors are grateful to the following no-profit associations: ANFFAS - Associazione Nazionale Famiglie di Persone con Disabilitá Affettiva e/o Relazionale Onlus, Macerata, Italy; CEPS Onlus - Centro Emiliano studi sociali per la trisomia 21, Bologna, Italy; and OPIMM - Opera dell'Immacolata Onlus, Bologna, Italy, who helped in the enrolment of the DS persons. The authors also particularly thank all the DS persons and their families who participated in the study.

Funding

SH was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIA/NIH 5R01AG042511-02). The brain data from H. Vinters and S. Tung were supported by P50 AG16570 and the Univ of California Multi-Campus Research grant (MRPI). The generation of data set 3 and the co-authors from Italy were supported by the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (grant agreement no. 259679 ‘IDEAL’, by the CARISBO foundation and by the Italian Ministry of Health, Progetto Ricerca Finalizzata 2008, convenzione 35.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supporting Information

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher's web-site.

Data S1-S5 Detailed description of datasets, Public availability of data sets, Ethics, DNA methylation measurements, Statistical analysis, Estimation of blood cell type composition based on DNAm data, Reference free method for estimating cell counts and confounders, Evaluation of causal models using structural equation models and Marginal analysis and meta analysis for finding CpGs that relate to DS status or age acceleration.

Fig. s1 Results in different brain regions.

Fig. s2 Results by gender.

Fig. s3 Mean methylation versus age and DS status.

Fig. s4 Blood cell types versus age acceleration in dataset 1.

Fig. s5 Blood cell types versus age acceleration in dataset 3.

Fig. s6 Results for alternative epigenetic biomarkers of aging.

Fig. s7 Preservation of marginal associations with age and age acceleration

Fig. s8 Preservation of associations with DS status.

Fig. s9 Two CpGs that are hyper-methylated in DS.

Fig. s10 Two CpGs that are hypo-methylated in DS.

Table s1 Multivariate regression models involving blood cells.

Table s2 Multivariate regression models based on reference free covariates.

Table s3 Results of the structural equation model analysis.

acel0014-0491-sd1.docx (544KB, docx)

Data S6 Results for Supplementary data file for relating CpGs with age acceleration and DS status.

acel0014-0491-sd2.csv (8.8MB, csv)

References

  1. Costa V, Angelini C, D'Apice L, Mutarelli M, Casamassimi A, Sommese L, Gallo MA, Aprile M, Esposito R, Leone L, Donizetti A, Crispi S, Rienzo M, Sarubbi B, Calabrò R, Picardi M, Salvatore P, Infante T, DeBerardinis P, Napoli Cl, Ciccodicola A. Massive-Scale RNA-Seq analysis of non ribosomal transcriptome in human trisomy 21. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e18493. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cuadrado E, Barrena MJ. Immune dysfunction in Down's syndrome: primary immune deficiency or early senescence of the immune system? Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1996;78:209–214. doi: 10.1006/clin.1996.0031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Devenny DA, Wegiel J, Schupf N, Jenkins E, Zigman W, Krinsky-McHale SJ, Silverman WP. Dementia of the Alzheimer's type and accelerated aging in Down syndrome. Sci. Aging Knowledge Environ. 2005;(14) doi: 10.1126/sageke.2005.14.dn1. ):dn1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Esposito G, Imitola J, Lu J, De Filippis D, Scuderi C, Ganesh VS, Folkerth R, Hecht J, Shin S, Iuvone T, et al. Genomic and functional profiling of human Down syndrome neural progenitors implicates S100B and aquaporin 4 in cell injury. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2008;17:440–457. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hannum G, Guinney J, Zhao L, Zhang L, Hughes G, Sadda S, Klotzle B, Bibikova M, Fan J-B, Gao Y, et al. Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol. Cell. 2013;49:359–367. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Horvath S. DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol. 2013;14:R115. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Horvath S, Zhang Y, Langfelder P, Kahn R, Boks M, van Eijk K, van den Berg L, Ophoff RA. Aging effects on DNA methylation modules in human brain and blood tissue. Genome Biol. 2012;13:R97. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-r97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Horvath S, Erhart W, Brosch M, Ammerpohl O, von Schönfels W, Ahrens M, Heits N, Bell JT, Tsai P-C, Spector TD, et al. Obesity accelerates epigenetic aging of human liver. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:15538–15543. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412759111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Houseman EA, Molitor J, Marsit CJ. Reference-free cell mixture adjustments in analysis of DNA methylation data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1431–1439. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jenkins EC, Ye L, Gu H, Ni SA, Duncan CJ, Velinov M, Pang D, Krinsky-McHale SJ, Zigman WB, Schupf N, et al. Increased “absence” of telomeres may indicate Alzheimer's disease/dementia status in older individuals with Down syndrome. Neurosci. Lett. 2008;440:340–343. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.05.098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jones M, Fejes A, Kobor M. DNA methylation, genotype and gene expression: who is driving and who is along for the ride? Genome Biol. 2013a;14:126. doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-7-126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones MJ, Farre P, McEwen LM, Macisaac JL, Watt K, Neumann SM, Emberly E, Cynader MS, Virji-Babul N, Kobor MS. Distinct DNA methylation patterns of cognitive impairment and trisomy 21 in Down syndrome. BMC Med. Genomics. 2013b;6:58. doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-6-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kerkel K, Schupf N, Hatta K, Pang D, Salas M, Kratz A, Minden M, Murty V, Zigman WB, Mayeux RP, et al. Altered DNA Methylation in Leukocytes with Trisomy 21. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kimura M, Cao X, Skurnick J, Cody M, Soteropoulos P, Aviv A. Proliferation dynamics in cultured skin fibroblasts from Down syndrome subjects. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2005;39:374–380. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kusters MA, Verstegen RH, de Vries E. Down syndrome: is it really characterized by precocious immunosenescence? Aging Dis. 2011;2:538–545. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Letourneau A, Santoni FA, Bonilla X, Sailani MR, Gonzalez D, Kind J, Chevalier C, Thurman R, Sandstrom RS, Hibaoui Y, et al. Domains of genome-wide gene expression dysregulation in Down's syndrome. Nature. 2014;508:345–350. doi: 10.1038/nature13200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lott IT, Head E. Alzheimer disease and Down syndrome: factors in pathogenesis. Neurobiol. Aging. 2005;26:383–389. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Moran J. Aging and Down Syndrome. ndss: A Health & Well-Being Guidebook; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  19. Patterson D, Cabelof DC. Down syndrome as a model of DNA polymerase beta haploinsufficiency and accelerated aging. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2012;133:133–137. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2011.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Teipel S, Hampel H. Neuroanatomy of Down syndrome in vivo: a model of preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Behav. Genet. 2006;36:405–415. doi: 10.1007/s10519-006-9047-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Teschendorff AE, Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Ramus SJ, Weisenberger DJ, Shen H, Campan M, Noushmehr H, Bell CG, Maxwell AP, et al. Age-dependent DNA methylation of genes that are suppressed in stem cells is a hallmark of cancer. Genome Res. 2010;20:440–446. doi: 10.1101/gr.103606.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Vaziri H, Schachter F, Uchida I, Wei L, Zhu X, Effros R, Cohen D, Harley CB. Loss of telomeric DNA during aging of normal and trisomy 21 human lymphocytes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1993;52:661–667. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zigman WB. Atypical aging in Down syndrome. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2013;18:51–67. doi: 10.1002/ddrr.1128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data S1-S5 Detailed description of datasets, Public availability of data sets, Ethics, DNA methylation measurements, Statistical analysis, Estimation of blood cell type composition based on DNAm data, Reference free method for estimating cell counts and confounders, Evaluation of causal models using structural equation models and Marginal analysis and meta analysis for finding CpGs that relate to DS status or age acceleration.

Fig. s1 Results in different brain regions.

Fig. s2 Results by gender.

Fig. s3 Mean methylation versus age and DS status.

Fig. s4 Blood cell types versus age acceleration in dataset 1.

Fig. s5 Blood cell types versus age acceleration in dataset 3.

Fig. s6 Results for alternative epigenetic biomarkers of aging.

Fig. s7 Preservation of marginal associations with age and age acceleration

Fig. s8 Preservation of associations with DS status.

Fig. s9 Two CpGs that are hyper-methylated in DS.

Fig. s10 Two CpGs that are hypo-methylated in DS.

Table s1 Multivariate regression models involving blood cells.

Table s2 Multivariate regression models based on reference free covariates.

Table s3 Results of the structural equation model analysis.

acel0014-0491-sd1.docx (544KB, docx)

Data S6 Results for Supplementary data file for relating CpGs with age acceleration and DS status.

acel0014-0491-sd2.csv (8.8MB, csv)

Articles from Aging Cell are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES