Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2015 Apr 7;54(15):2481–2489. doi: 10.1021/bi501462g

Structural insight into MtmC, a bifunctional ketoreductase-methyltransferase involved in the assembly of the mithramycin trisaccharide chain

Jhong Min Chen 1, Caxia Hou 1, Guojun Wang 1, Oleg V Tsodikov 1,*, Jürgen Rohr 1,*
PMCID: PMC4406830  NIHMSID: NIHMS663394  PMID: 25587924

Abstract

More and more post-PKS tailoring enzymes are recognized to be multifunctional and co-dependent on other tailoring enzymes. One of the recently discovered intriguing examples is MtmC, a bifunctional TDP-4-keto-d-olivose ketoreductase-methyltransferase, which – in co-dependence with glycosyltransferase MtmGIV – is a key contributor to the biosynthesis of the critical trisaccharide chain of the antitumor antibiotic mithramycin (MTM), produced by Streptomyces argillaceus. We report crystal structures of three binary complexes of MtmC with its methylation co-substrate SAM, its co-product SAH, and a nucleotide TDP as well as crystal structures of two ternary complexes, MtmC-SAH-TDP-4-keto-d-olivose and MtmC-SAM-TDP, in the range of 2.2-2.7 Å in resolution. The structures reveal general and sugar-specific recognition and catalytic structural features of MtmC. Depending on the catalytic function that is carried out by MtmC, it must bind either NADPH or SAM in the same co-factor binding pocket. A tyrosine residue (Tyr79) appears as a lid covering the sugar moiety of the substrate during the methyl transfer reaction. This residue swings out of the active site by about 180° in the absence of the substrate. This unique conformational change likely serves to release the methylated product and, possibly, to open up the active site for binding the bulkier co-substrate NADPH prior to the reduction reaction.

Keywords: crystal structure, conformational change, bifunctional enzyme, natural product, sugar biosynthesis

INTRODUCTION

Mithramycin 1 (MTM; Fig. 1) is a member of the aureolic acid family of antitumor antibiotics that also includes the chromomycins, olivomycin, durhamycin A, UCH9, and chromocyclomycin.1-4 Aureolic acids act on gram positive bacteria, and inhibit growth and multiplication of several cancer cell lines through dis regulation of transcription, by interacting in an Mg2+-dependent manner with the minor groove of GC-rich regions of DNA.5, 6 Durhamycin A is also an inhibitor of HIV Tat transactivation.4 Additionally, chromomycin and MTM are strong inducers of erythroid differentiation in K562 cells and potent inhibitors of neuronal apoptosis, making these compounds candidates for therapeutics of haematological diseases and neurological disorders, respectively.7 MTM was recently discovered as the only drug out of 50,000 screened compounds to potently antagonize the abnormal oncogenic transcription factor EWS-FLI1 in Ewing sarcoma, a poorly treatable bone and soft tissue cancer that affects mostly children and young adults.8 MTM is currently in clinical trials to treat this devastating cancer (National Cancer Institute, clinical trial NCT01610570). MTM was also identified as a potent down-regulator of ABCG2 efflux pumps,9 whose overexpression is responsible for resistance to lung cancer chemotherapeutics. MTM recently entered clinical trials to treat cancers of the respiratory tract, including esophageal and lung cancers (National Cancer Institute, clinical trial NCT01624090).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Chemical structures of MTM and other representative aureolic acid drugs.

MTM and all other aureolic acid compounds (except chromocylomycin) contain a tricyclic chromophore with two oligosaccharide chains attached via O glycosidic bonds at position C-2 and C-6 of the aglycone, respectively, as well as two aliphatic side chains at C-3 and C-7 positions, respectively (Figure 1). The aglycone is formed by a type-2 polyketide synthase (PKS) from one acetyl-CoA and nine malonyl-CoA units.10-13 In each aureolic acid compound, except durhamycin A and UCH9, the oligosaccharides at C-2 and C-6 are di- and trisaccharide chains, respectively, and they contain unique deoxyhexose sugars. The trisaccharide chain of MTM is a key structural part that appears to be evolutionary optimized for binding DNA in a minor groove of GC-rich regions. This chain contains a d-olivose (sugar C), a d-oliose (sugar D) and a d-mycarose (sugar E). Although this chain contains three sugar units, its biosynthesis requires only two glycosyltransferases, namely MtmGIV and MtmGIII. MtmGIV initiates the glycosylation cascade by transferring a d-olivose moiety to the aglycone precursor premithramycinone, and finishes the trisaccharide chain by transferring a d-mycarose unit (Fig. 2).14 MtmGIII acts by transferring the middle sugar, d-oliose.15, 16 Both of the MtmGIV catalyzed steps are supported by MtmC, which – in situ – generates either TDP-d-olivose by reduction or TDP-d-4 keto mycarose by methylation from the same precursor, TDP-4-keto-d-olivose (TDP-KOL). 17 Furthermore, MtmTIII is required for the reduction of 4-keto-d-mycarose to d-mycarose, either prior or immediately after the glycosyltransfer step.14 Therefore, activities of MtmC, MtmGIV and MtmTIII need to be coordinated. How these enzymes cooperate remains one of the most intriguing mysteries of the MTM biosynthetic pathway. Here we present the first piece of the puzzle of the multi-faceted biosynthesis of MTM’s trisaccharide chain, the crystal structure of the bi-functional ketoreductase-methyltransferase MtmC.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The biosynthetic route for generation of the trisaccharide chain of MTM, highlighting the central role of MtmC and MtmGIV in the sugar elaboration the chain assembly.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Protein expression, and purification and site-directed mutagenesis of MtmC

The original annotated sequence of the mtmC gene from Streptomyces argillaceus contained inaccuracies; the corrected sequence was deposited into GenBank under submission numbers GUSub26197 and GUSub26196 for the amino acid residue and nucleotide sequences, respectively. MtmC protein was expressed following a previously reported protocol.17 The fractions containing MtmC were pooled and dialysed against 20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 100 mM M NaCl, 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol and 10% glycerol. For biochemical assays, the enzyme was concentrated to 14 mg/mL, flash-frozen and stored at −80 °C. For crystallization, the purified protein was further passed through a size-exclusion Sephacryl S-200 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in 40 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 (pH adjusted at room temperature), 0.1 M NaCl and 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol and the fractions containing the protein were pooled and concentrated using an Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter device (Millipore) to 12 mg/ml.

MtmC Tyr79Phe and MtmC Tyr79Ala mutants were generated by site-directed mutagenesis with the QuikChange kit (Stratagene), following the manufacturer's protocol. Incorporation of the desired mutation into each plasmid was confirmed by DNA sequencing at the University of Kentucky DNA Sequencing Core. Mutant proteins were expressed and purified analogously to the wild-type enzyme.

Crystallization, data collection and crystal structure determination

The initial crystallization condition was found by a sparse incomplete factorial screen (Hampton Research Crystal Screen), by vapor diffusion in hanging drops at 21 °C. At the optimized conditions, the drops contained 1 OL of MtmC with 1 mM ligand (SAM, SAH, TDP, TDP-4-keto d-olivose or their mixtures, as specified) and 1 OL of the reservoir solution (0.1 M MES pH 5.5, 0.2 M ammonium acetate, 16% PEG 4000). The crystals were gradually transferred into the cryoprotectant buffer (0.1 M MES pH 5.5, 0.2 M ammonium acetate, 16% PEG 4000, 20% glycerol) and rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen.

X-ray diffraction data were collected at 100 K at beamlines 21ID-G (for MtmC-SAM-TDP crystals) and 22ID (for the other crystals) of the Advanced Photon Source at the Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne, IL). The data were processed with HKL2000.18 The structure of MtmC-SAM-TDP complex was determined by molecular replacement with MOLREP19 with the structure of methyltransferase TcaB9 (PDB accession code 4E2X)20 as a search model. The structure was then iteratively rebuilt and refined with COOT21 and REFMAC,22 respectively. The ligands in this and other structures were modeled without uncertainty into strong omit Fo-Fc electron density. The structure of MtmC-SAM-TDP served as a starting point for rebuilding and refinement of all other structures of MtmC. The data collection and refinement statistics are given in Table 1. Crystal structures listed in Table 1 were deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes 1RV9 (complex with SAH), 4RVD (complex with SAM), 4RVF (complex with TDP), 4RVG (complex with SAM and TDP) and 4RVH (complex with SAH and TDP-4-keto-d-olivose).

Table 1.

X-ray diffraction data collection and structure refinement statistics.

Molecular complex MtmC-SAH-TDP-KOL MtmC-SAM-TDP MtmC-SAM MtmC-SAH MtmC-TDP
Data collection
Space group I4122 I4122 I4122 I4122 I4122
Monom./asymm. unit 1 1 1 1 1
Unit cell dimensions
    a, b, c (Å) 135.4, 135.4, 127.3 134.7, 134.7, 127.8 134.8, 134.8, 129.7 134.2, 134.2, 130.0 134.2, 134.2, 132.3
    α, β, γ (°) 90, 90, 90 90, 90, 90 90, 90, 90 90, 90, 90 90, 90, 90
Resolution (Å) 50-2.35 (2.39-2.35)a 50-2.3 (2.34-2.30) 50-2.2 (2.24-2.20) 50-2.2 (2.24-2.20) 50-2.7 (2.8-2.7)
I/σ 28.2 (2.5) 40.3 (4.7) 39.9 (3.2) 41.8 (3.7) 25.2 (3.3)
Completeness (%) 95.7 (98.9) 99.5 (100) 100 (100) 99.0 (100) 100 (100)
Redundancy 6.6 (6.5) 9.8 (10) 8.1 (8.2) 9.6 (9.8) 9.7 (10.0)
Rmerge 0.075 (0.61) 0.077 (0.499) 0.064 (0.625) 0.087 (0.627) 0.129 (0.676)
Unique reflections 21204 24771 28993 28774 16056
Structure refinement
Resolution (Å) 40-2.35 40-2.3 40-2.2 40-2.2 40-2.7
R (%) 20.6 21.2 21.4 20.3 20.9
Rfree (%) 23.1 23.8 25.7 24.1 24.8
Rmsd from ideal
    bond lengths (Å) 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.005
    bond angles (°) 1.01 1.08 1.13 1.1 0.97
Ramachadran plotb
% residues by regions
    most allowed 98.1 97.1 92.2 97.8 90.5
    additional allowed 1.9 2.9 7.3 2.2 8.7
    generously allowed 0 0 0.6 0 0.3
    disallowed 0 0 0 0 0.6
a

Values in parentheses refer to the highest-resolution shell.

b

PROCHECK statistics.33

Methyltranferase activity assays

The product of the 3-methylation reaction by wild-type MtmC, TDP-4-keto-D-mycarose, was unobservable likely because the axial 3-OH group generated concomitantly with 3-methylation attacked the proximal phosphate to cleave the phosphodiester bond of TDP, resulting in the loss of UV absorbance.17 For this reason, we monitored formation of the co-product SAH. Kinetic assays were carried out for the wild-type and mutant MtmC (Tyr79Phe and Tyr79Ala) by discontinuous HPLC (Waters 600 system, consisting of a controller, a Waters 996 photodiode array detector, and a Delta 600 pump). A 100 L reaction mixture contained 25 mM Hepes pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 90 M TDP KOL, 2 mM SAM, and 5 M MtmC. The reactions were initiated by the addition of enzyme and incubated at 22 °C, to minimize the non-enzymatic degradation of SAM. 50 μL aliquots were quenched at 60 and 300 min (in the range where SAH concentration increased linearly over time) with 5 μL of 1.5 g/mL trichloroacetic acid (13.6% w/v final concentration) and then incubated on ice for 10 min. After centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 3 min, 50 μL of the supernatant was passed through a Phenomenex Kinetex™ 5 μm EVO C18 100 Å column (250 × 4.6 mm) and eluted isocratically in 10 mM ammonium formate with 5% methanol (pH = 3.0) at 0.8 mL/min. The area under the chromatogram absorbance peak at 260 nm corresponding to SAH was measured. The rate of conversion of SAM to SAH for the wild-type enzyme and the two mutants was calculated from the 60 and 300 min data points.

RESULTS

Homologs of MtmC

A BLAST search23 for MtmC homologs yielded a number of mostly putative bacterial Class I family SAM-dependent sugar C-methyltransferases dominated by those from Streptomyces. MtmC homologs whose function has been demonstrated or postulated are listed in Table 2 together with the respective sugar moiety and the final natural product, whose biosynthesis they are involved in. The multiple sequence alignment of MtmC and these homologs are given in Supplementary Fig. 1. The only homolog of MtmC that has been rigorously characterized both functionally and structurally, by Holden and co-workers, is C-3’-methyltransferase TcaB9 from Micromonospora chalcea, from the biosynthetic pathway for d-tetronitrose in tetrocarcin A.20, 24 Structural information on MtmC would not only help elucidate its intriguing catalytic mechanism, but also reveal divergent structural features of this family of C-methyltransferases responsible for recognition of specific sugar substrates.

Table 2.

MtmC and its homologs.

Protein Bacterium Sugar product Pathway product Reference

MtmC Streptomyces argillaceus D-mycarose/D-olivose mithramycin this study and17
SnoGa Streptomyces nogalater nogalose nogalamycin 34
CloU Streptomyces roseochromogenes var. oscitans DS12.976 5,5-gem-dimethyl deoxysugar (GDD) clorobiocin 25
CouU Streptomyces rishiriensis GDD coumermycin A1 26, 27
NovU Streptomyces spheroides (niveus) GDD noviose novobiocin 28
ORF14/SmtA Amycolatopsis orientalis vancosamine chloroeremomycin/vancomycin 35
TcaB9 Micromonospora chalcea D-tetronitrose tetrocarcin A 20, 24
TiaS2 Dactylosporangium aurantiacum subsp. hamdegenensis NRRL 18085 modified D-rhamnose tiacumicin B 29
EryBIII Saccharopolyspora erythraea modified L-mycarose erythromycin A 30
TylCIII Streptomyces fradiae L-mycarose tylosin 31
AviG1 Streptomyces viridochromogenes Tü57 L-mycarose avilamycin 32
a

The homologs are presented in the order of their sequence similarily to MtmC, from the most to the least similar homologs.

Overview of crystal structures of MtmC with its substrates and co-substrates

We determined crystal structures of three binary complexes: MtmC-SAM, MtmC-SAH and MtmC-TDP and two ternary complexes: MtmC-SAH-TDP-4-keto-d-olivose and MtmC-SAH-TDP (Fig. 3). In all the structures, the ligands were very clearly resolved in the strong omit Fo-Fc electron density map (Fig. 3). The apo-MtmC did not form crystals suitable for a diffraction experiment, likely due to mobility of protein regions involved in substrate or co-substrate binding. The overall structure of MtmC is similar to that of TcaB9.24 MtmC is a monomer with a tri-partite fold. Its N-terminal domain (residues 1-68) consists of a β-sheet and extensive regions lacking secondary structure. As in TcaB9, these loop regions contain a tightly bound Zn2+ ion coordinated tetrahedrally to four conserved cysteines (Cys13, Cys16, Cys56 and Cys59; Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. 1). The central domain (residues 69-288) and the C terminal domain (residues 289-423) are structurally similar, with a Rossman-type fold forming a SAM and a TDP binding site, respectively. Except for one region of the central domain, whose residues interact both with SAM/SAH and the sugar moiety of the TDP-sugar substrate (residues 76 to 84; described in detail in the next section), all structures of MtmC are similar to each other.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A cartoon representation of crystal structures of MtmC with its biologically relevant ligands. The N-, central and C-terminal domains are shown in yellow, blue and green, respectively. The ligands are shown as sticks, SAM and SAH in pink and the substrate and TDP in orange. The sensor loop (residues 76-84) is shown in black. The Zn2+ ion is a red sphere. A. The structure of MtmC-SAH-TDP-4-keto-olivose (MtmC-SAH-TDP-KOL). The zoom-in views of the active sites of MtmC-SAM-TDP, MtmC-SAM, MtmC-SAH and MtmC-TDP complexes are shown in panels B, C, D and E, respectively.

MtmC-SAM and MtmC-SAH complexes

In the crystal structures of MtmC-SAM and MtmC-SAH complexes, the co-factor and its product are bound in the conserved binding pocket formed by residues of the central domain, similarly to the bound SAH in the crystal structure of TcAB924 (Fig. 3A-D). The protein conformations in the complexes with SAM and SAH are nearly identical (Figs 3C, D). A striking difference in the substrate binding pocket between MtmC-SAM/SAH and TcaB9 structures is in the conformation of a loop region between residues 76 and 84, which we will call the sensor loop (Fig. 3). The backbone of the sensor loop in MtmC switches its conformation based on whether the susbstrate or the co-substrate occupies their respective binding pockets. In contrast, the conformation of this region in TcaB9 does not differ significantly among any of its binary and ternary complexes with the co-substrate, substrate or their products.20, 24 The conformations of the sensor loop of MtmC when only SAM/SAH or only TDP is bound, allow relatively facile access to the active site from outside. In contrast, when both SAM and TDP are bound this loop adopts a conformation that is more closed onto the active site. Finally when both SAH and TDP-4’-keto-olivose are bound, the sensor loop fis in the most closed state, sterically blocking the dissociation of the ligands from it.

MtmC-SAH-TDP-4-keto-d-olivose, MtmC-SAM-TDP and MtmC-TDP structures

The ternary complex MtmC-SAH-TDP-4-keto-d-olivose represents a mimic of the reaction intermediate prior to the catalytic methyl transfer. Here, we observe a number of interactions that stabilize the bound substrate TDP-4-keto-d-olivose (Fig. 4). These interactions are similar to those observed in the ternary complex TcaB9-SAH-TDP-3-amino 2,3,6-trideoxy-4-keto-d-glucose, except His178 of MtmC is replaced by Asn 177 in TcaB9, both making a van der Waals contact between their respective Cβ-methylene group and the 5-methyl group of the sugar. The environment of the 3-OH group of the sugar is highly hydrophilic, with the side chains of Glu225 and His182 engaged in hydrogen bonds with this hydroxyl group. Tyr77 is in the sensor loop, but its conformation does not change significantly in different complexes, and its hydroxyl group appears to form a weak hydrogen bond with the 3-OH of the sugar (with the O-O distance of 3.35 Å). His226 forms a hydrogen bond with the 4-keto group of the olivose, consistent with its potential role as the catalytic acid, demonstrated for its counterpart in TcaB9, His225.20 The 3-OH group of the sugar points towards the sulfur atom of SAH, indicating that the methylation occurs with inversion of stereochemistry at this position, in agreement with the biosynthetic pathway and the enzymatic properties of MtmC.17 In contrast, the counterpart 3-amino-group of TDP-3-amino 2,3,6-trideoxy-4-keto-d-glucose points away from the SAH in the complex with TcaB9, indicating that methylation by this enzyme occurs without inversion at this stereocenter.24

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The active site of the MtmC-SAH-TDP KOL complex. The ligands and the residues interacting with the sugar moiety of the substrate are shown as sticks and colored according to the protein region to which they belong, as in Fig. 1.

The sensor loop and especially Tyr79 exhibit a progression of conformational states in complexes MtmC-SAM/SAH, MtmC-TDP, MtmC-SAM-TDP and MtmC-SAH-TDP-4-keto-d-olivose, as follows. In the MtmC-SAM and MtmC SAH complexes (Fig. 5A; MtmC-SAH is nearly identical), Tyr79 points out of the active site. When only TDP is bound (Fig. 5B), the sensor loop remains essentially unchanged, except for Tyr79, whose side chain is rotated by 130° where it does not interact with the TDP phosphates (Fig. 5B). In the MtmC-TDP complex, the only complex not containing SAM or SAH, the sensor loop exhibits partial disorder, whereas it is well ordered in the MtmC-SAM and MtmC-SAH complexes, indicating that this loop undergoes an order-disorder transition upon dissociation of SAH. This is consistent with Tyr77, Tyr79 and Thr81 in this loop forming a part of the co-factor binding interface in the ternary complexes (Figs. 4 and 5C, D). In the ternary complex MtmC-SAM-TDP (Fig. 5C), the backbone of the sensor loop around Tyr79 is moved towards the active site, with Tyr79 pointing out of the active center. In this conformation, Tyr79 does not interact with either SAM or TDP, apparently because the previous conformation would place the aromatic ring of Tyr in the unfavorable charged environment of the TDP phosphate groups SAM. In all the above complexes, waters fill empty co-substrate or substrate binding pockets. Specifically, in complexes MtmC-SAM/SAH and MtmC-TDP, a water molecule is invariably found in place of the 3-OH group of the sugar (Fig. 5A-C). In complex MtmC-SAH-TDP-4-keto-d-olivose (Fig. 5D), the sensor loop stays in the same backbone conformation, and Tyr79 is in a different rotamer state (different from that in the MtmC-SAM complex by 180°), capping the substrate by the steric contact between the phenol ring of Tyr79 and the nonpolar sugar-β-phosphate junction as well as a making a hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl group of Tyr79 and the α-phosphate. In addition, in this conformation Tyr79 interacts sterically with SAH. This conformation of the sensor loop and Tyr79 is similar to that observed in all structures of TcaB9, with and without the substrates, co-substrates or products. Therefore, unlike TcaB9, MtmC exhibits conformational plasticity of the sensor loop and its residues, especially Tyr79.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The different conformations of the sensor loop (in black sticks) in (A) MtmC-SAM, (B) MtmC-TDP, (C) MtmC-SAM-TDP and (D) MtmC-SAH-TDP-KOL complexes. The water molecule that occupies the site of the 3-OH group of the sugar in it absence is shown as a blue sphere.

Methyltransferase activity of MtmC mutants Tyr79Ala and Tyr79Phe

To probe the functional importance of Tyr79, we measured the rate of SAH formation upon methyl transfer. We found that Tyr79Ala and Tyr79Phe mutants of MtmC catalyzed the methyl transfer ~7-8 times less efficiently than the wild-type MtmC (Fig. 6). This demonstrated the functional importance of the hydroxyl group of the Tyr79 in positioning the substrate for catalysis, consistent with its interaction with the α-phosphate of the TDP moiety shown by the structural analysis.

Figure 6. Effect of mutations of Tyr79 on the methyltransferase activity of MtmC.

Figure 6

Shown are methyltransferase activities of wild-type MtmC and its mutants, Tyr79Phe and Tyr79Ala, relative to that of the wild-type enzyme.

DISCUSSION

An intriguing enzyme complex MtmC/MtmGIV plays a key role in the biosynthesis of the important trisaccharide chain of the anticancer drug mithramycin. As a stepping stone towards elucidation of how these two enzymes cooperate, we determine the protein crystal structure of ketoreductase/C-methyltransferase MtmC. We obtained crystal structures of MtmC with its biologically relevant ligands, including that of the ternary complex of MtmC with bound substrate 4-keto-d-olivose and SAH. Because the TDP-sugar binding pocket appears to be highly conserved in this family of methyltransferases, and the only other access to the sugar moiety (without a major protein conformational change) is via the SAM-binding channel, MtmC must use the same channel to bind either NADPH or SAM, depending on the catalytic function. The conformationally versatile sensor loop and, specifically, Tyr79 likely play an important role in active site dehydration and the control of substrate and co-substrate binding and product release. Our biochemical and structural data explain the universal conservation of this Tyr among MtmC and its homologs (Supplementary Fig. 1): the hydrogen bond between the OH of Tyr79 and the TDP moiety is critically important for the catalytic turnover, since the Tyr79Phe mutant is unable to support methylation in vitro. Moreover, Tyr79 is likely needed to ensure discrimination of the sugar-TDP from TDP or other abundant ligands, via its ability to establish a bi-dentate interaction with both the sugar and the TDP moieties of the substrate, while also making a contact with SAM. Indeed, Tyr79 is seen in the conformation ensuring such interaction only in the ternary complex MtmC-SAH-TDP-4-keto-d-olivose, but not in complex MtmC-SAM-TDP. Because the active site pocket appears too constricted for binding of the larger co-factor, NADPH, when Tyr79 is in the “in” conformation, we propose that MtmC has uniquely evolved to accommodate NADPH by swinging Tyr79 out of the active site to make room for NADPH binding. In support of this idea, the TcaB9, which is a monofunctional methyltransferase, the homologous Tyr78 does not appear to undergo this conformational change. We modeled NADPH bound to MtmC in this Tyr79 “out” conformation (Fig. 7); the nicotinic acid moiety of NADPH in this model is in place of the phenol ring of Tyr79 in the “in” conformation, with the ribose rings of SAM and SAH occupying the same site. Because NADPH is larger than SAM, the adenine base of NADPH in the model is more solvent-exposed, as expected, since the binding site has evolved to bind mainly SAM in this family of enzymes. Indeed, as we observed only partial density for NADPH in the crystals grown or soaked with NADPH or NADPH and the substrate (insufficient for building its structure in the active site of MtmC), NADPH is likely only loosely bound.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

The model of the MtmC-NADPH-TDP-KOL complex.

The structures of MtmC and TcaB9 in complexes with their respective substrates together with the sequence alignment (Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 1) allow one to analyze potential sugar recognition and regiospecificity rules among close homologs of MtmC. Interestingly, some of the homologs function as 5-methyltransferases, methylating a position symmetrical with respect to a 180° rotation around the axis going through positions 1-4 of the sugar ring. Such rotation is needed to expose the 5-position for methylation and, consequently, the ring oxygen of the sugar will then be located in place of the 2-methylene group in the structure of MtmC-SAH-TDP-KOL. These 5-C methyltransferases are CloU,25 CouU26, 27 and NovU28 from the clorobiocin, coumermycin A1 and novobiocin biosynthetic pathways, respectively, and a more divergent homolog TiaS229 from the tiacumicin B pathway. The 2-methylene in the MtmC and TcaB9 structures in complexes with their respective substrates are dehydrated and are not in close proximity to potential hydrogen bond donors. The side chain of Asp34 that points towards this sugar position is too far to interact with it and, instead, Asp34 interacts with a potential catalytic residue Glu225. Interestingly, in CloU, CouU and NovU Asp34 is replaced by a Gly, creating a void. A coupled residue difference in these three 5-C-methyltransferases is a replacement of Pro78 in the sensor loop by an Arg. These two changes may either expose this position, now occupied by a ring oxygen, to solvent, or through a potential conformational change of the backbone due to the Pro78 substitution, provide the Arg as a hydrogen bond donor for the ring oxygen. TiaS2 appears to be a special case, where Asp34 is not replaced and Pro78 is replaced by a Val. However, TiaS2 is also the only exception in that in place of Tyr223 it contains a His, which has a potential for formation of strong hydrogen bonds. In even more divergent 3-C-methyltransferases EryBIII30 TylCIII31 and AviG1,32 a Gly is in place of both Asp34 and Pro78, but a Cys in place of Tyr223 may preserve the overall dehydrated environment of the methylene at the 2-position. These last three examples are more speculative, since the sensor loop sequence in these homologs is very different from that of MtmC and is very Gly- and Ser-rich; therefore, its conformation may not be well predicted by the structures of MtmC and TcaB9. Finally, a much smaller Cys in place of Tyr223 in EryBIII is able to accommodate a bulky methoxy group that is also installed at 3-position, which would otherwise clash with a Tyr.

While both the sugar donor substrate generation and transfer are catalyzed by MtmC, MtmTIII and MtmGIV for the first and the third sugar of the trisaccharide chain, the overall biosynthetic sequence of the trisaccharide chain biosynthesis necessitates one MtmC-independent step in between, namely the transfer of d-oliose, the second sugar of the chain, by MtmGIII. Thus, many intriguing questions remain; for example, how is the product of the first MtmC/MtmGIV reaction passed onto MtmGIII, and then back to MtmC/MtmGIV? Are three or all four of these enzymes somehow assembled into a multi-enzyme complex? We hope that complementary ongoing structural studies of MtmGIV and MtmTIII will shed light onto these questions.

Supplementary Material

suppl info

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank the staff of sectors 21 and 22 of the Advanced Photon Source at the Argonne National Laboratory for the assistance with X-ray diffraction data collection. This work was supported by a grant of the National Institutes of Health (grant CA 091901 and GM 105977) to J.R. and start-up funds from University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy to O.V.T.

ABBREVIATIONS

MTM

mithramycin

MT

methyl transferase

PCR

polymerase chain reaction

HPLC

high performance liquid chromatography

DMSO

dimethylsulfoxide

LB

Lysogeny broth

IPTG

isopropyl-β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside

IMAC

Immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography

Tris

tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane

TBE

Tris/Borate/EDTA

MS

mass spectrometry

HRMS

high resolution mass spectrometry

NMR

nuclear magnetic resonance

ESI-MS

electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

HRESI-MS

high resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

TDP

thymidine diphosphate

TDP-KOL

TDP-4-keto-d-olivose

SAM

S-adenosyl-methionine

SAH

S-adenosyl homocysteine

NADPH

nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate

GDD

5,5-gem-dimethyl deoxysugar

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Skarbek JD, Speedie MK. Antitumor antibiotics of the aureolic acid group: chromomycin A3, mithramycin A, and olivomycin A. In: Aszalos A, editor. Antitumor compounds of natural origin: chemistry and biochemistry. CRC Press; Boca Raton, Florida.: 1981. pp. 191–235. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lombó F, Menendez N, Salas JA, Méndez C. The aureolic acid family of antitumor compounds: structure, mode of action, biosynthesis, and novel derivatives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006;73:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0511-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Katahira R, Uosaki Y, Ogawa H, Yamashita Y, Nakano H, Yoshida M. UCH9, a new antitumor antibiotic produced by Streptomyces. II. Structure elucidation of UCH9 by mass and NMR spectroscopy. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 1998;51:267–274. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.51.267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jayasuriya H, Lingham RB, Graham P, Quamina D, Herranz L, Genilloud O, Gagliardi M, Danzeisen R, Tomassini JE, Zink DL, Guan ZQ, Singh SB. Durhamycin A, a potent inhibitor of HIV Tat transactivation. J. Nat. Prod. 2002;65:1091–1095. doi: 10.1021/np010642f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Majee S, Sen R, Guha S, Bhattacharyya D, Dasgupta D. Differential Interactions of the Mg2+ Complexes of chromomycin A3 and mithramycin with poly(dG-dC)·poly(dC-dG) and poly(dG)·poly(dC). Biochemistry. 1997;36:2291–2299. doi: 10.1021/bi9613281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Silva DJ, Goodnow R, Jr., Kahne D. The sugars in chromomycin A3 stabilize the Mg(2+) dimer complex. Biochemistry. 1993;32:463–471. doi: 10.1021/bi00053a010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bianchi N, Osti F, Rutigliano C, Corradini FG, Borsetti E, Tomassetti M, Mischiati C, Feriotto G, Gambari R. The DNA-binding drugs mithramycin and chromomycin are powerful inducers of erythroid differentiation of human K562 cells. Brit. J. Haematol. 1999;104:258–265. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01173.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grohar PJ, Woldemichael GM, Griffin LB, Mendoza A, Chen QR, Yeung C, Currier DG, Davis S, Khanna C, Khan J, McMahon JB, Helman LJ. Identification of an inhibitor of the EWS FLI1 oncogenic transcription factor by high throughput screening. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2011;103:962–978. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang M, Mathur A, Zhang Y, Xi S, Atay S, Hong JA, Datrice N, Upham T, Kemp CD, Ripley RT, Wiegand G, Avital I, Fetsch P, Mani H, Zlott D, Robey R, Bates SE, Li X, Rao M, Schrump DS. Mithramycin represses basal and cigarette smoke-induced expression of ABCG2 and inhibits stem cell signaling in lung and esophageal cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2012;72:4178–4192. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Menéndez N, Nur-e-Alam M, Braña AF, Rohr J, Salas JA, Méndez C. Tailoring modification of deoxysugars during biosynthesis of the antitumour drug chromomycin A by Streptomyces griseus ssp. griseus. Mol. Microbiol. 2004;53:903–915. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04166.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Menéndez N, Nur-e-Alam M, Braña AF, Rohr J, Salas JA, Méndez C. Biosynthesis of the antitumor chromomycin A3 in Streptomyces griseus: analysis of the gene cluster and rational design of novel chromomycin analogs. Chem. Biol. 2004;11:21–32. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2003.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Menéndez N, Nur-e-Alam M, Fischer C, Braña AF, Salas JA, Rohr J, Méndez C. Deoxysugar transfer during chromomycin A3 biosynthesis in Streptomyces griseus subsp. griseus: new derivatives with antitumor activity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72:167–177. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.1.167-177.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Montanari A, Rosazza JP. Biogenesis of chromomycin A3 by Streptomyces griseus. J. Antibiot. 1990;43:883–889. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.43.883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Remsing LL, Garcia-Bernardo J, Gonzalez AM, Künzel E, Rix U, Braña AF, Bearden DW, Méndez C, Salas JA, Rohr J. Ketopremithramycins and ketomithramycins, four new aureolic acid type compounds obtained upon inactivation of two genes involved in the biosynthesis of the deoxysugar moieties of the antitumor drug mithramycin by Streptomyces argillaceus, reveal novel insights into post-PKS tailoring steps of the mithramycin biosynthetic pathway. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:1606–1614. doi: 10.1021/ja0105156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gonzalez A, Remsing LL, Lombó F, Fernandez MJ, Prado L, Braña AF, Künzel E, Rohr J, Méndez C, Salas JA. The mtmVUC genes of the mithramycin gene cluster in Streptomyces argillaceus are involved in the biosynthesis of the sugar moieties. Mol. Gen. Genet. 2001;264:827–835. doi: 10.1007/s004380000372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nur-e-Alam M, Méndez C, Salas JA, Rohr J. Elucidation of the glycosylation sequence of mithramycin biosynthesis: isolation of 3A-deolivosylpremithramycin B and its conversion to premithramycin B by glycosyltransferase MtmGII. Chembiochem. 2005;6:632–636. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200400309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang G, Pahari P, Kharel MK, Chen J, Zhu H, Van Lanen SG, Rohr J. Cooperation of two bifunctional enzymes in the biosynthesis and attachment of deoxysugars of the antitumor antibiotic mithramycin. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:10638–10642. doi: 10.1002/anie.201205414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Method. Enzymol. 1997;276:307–326. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vagin A, Teplyakov A. Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2010;66:22–25. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909042589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bruender NA, Thoden JB, Kaur M, Avey MK, Holden HM. Molecular architecture of a C 3′ methyltransferase involved in the biosynthesis of D-tetronitrose. Biochemistry. 2010;49:5891–5898. doi: 10.1021/bi100782b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004;60:2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Murshudov GN, Vagin AA, Dodson EJ. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 1997;53:240–255. doi: 10.1107/S0907444996012255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990;215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bruender NA, Holden HM. Probing the catalytic mechanism of a C-3′-methyltransferase involved in the biosynthesis of D tetronitrose. Protein Sci. 2012;21:876–886. doi: 10.1002/pro.2074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Freitag A, Li SM, Heide L. Biosynthesis of the unusual 5,5-gem-dimethyl-deoxysugar noviose: investigation of the C methyltransferase gene cloU. Microbiology. 2006;152:2433–2442. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28931-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang ZX, Li SM, Heide L. Identification of the coumermycin A(1) biosynthetic gene cluster of Streptomyces rishiriensis DSM 40489. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000;44:3040–3048. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.11.3040-3048.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li SM, Westrich L, Schmidt J, Kuhnt C, Heide L. Methyltransferase genes in Streptomyces rishiriensis: new coumermycin derivatives from gene-inactivation experiments. Microbiology. 2002;148:3317–3326. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-10-3317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thuy TT, Lee HC, Kim CG, Heide L, Sohng JK. Functional characterizations of novWUS involved in novobiocin biosynthesis from Streptomyces spheroides. Arch. Biochem. Biophy.s. 2005;436:161–167. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2005.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xiao Y, Li S, Niu S, Ma L, Zhang G, Zhang H, Ju J, Zhang C. Characterization of tiacumicin B biosynthetic gene cluster affording diversified tiacumicin analogues and revealing a tailoring dihalogenase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:1092–1105. doi: 10.1021/ja109445q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gaisser S, Bohm GA, Doumith M, Raynal MC, Dhillon N, Cortes J, Leadlay PF. Analysis of eryBI, eryBIII and eryBVII from the erythromycin biosynthetic gene cluster in Saccharopolyspora erythraea. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1998;258:78–88. doi: 10.1007/s004380050709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Takahashi H, Liu YN, Chen H, Liu HW. Biosynthesis of TDP-l mycarose: the specificity of a single enzyme governs the outcome of the pathway. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:9340–9341. doi: 10.1021/ja051409x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Weitnauer G, Gaisser S, Kellenberger L, Leadlay PF, Bechthold A. Analysis of a C-methyltransferase gene (aviG1) involved in avilamycin biosynthesis in Streptomyces viridochromogenes Tu57 and complementation of a Saccharopolyspora erythraea eryBIII mutant by aviG1. Microbiology. 2002;148:373–379. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-2-373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Laskowski RA, Macarthur MW, Moss DS, Thornton JM. Procheck - a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993;26:283–291. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Torkkell S, Kunnari T, Palmu K, Mantsala P, Hakala J, Ylihonko K. The entire nogalamycin biosynthetic gene cluster of Streptomyces nogalater: characterization of a 20-kb DNA region and generation of hybrid structures. Mol. Genet. Genomics. 2001;266:276–288. doi: 10.1007/s004380100554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chen H, Thomas MG, Hubbard BK, Losey HC, Walsh CT, Burkart MD. Deoxysugars in glycopeptide antibiotics: enzymatic synthesis of TDP-L-epivancosamine in chloroeremomycin biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000;97:11942–11947. doi: 10.1073/pnas.210395097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

suppl info

RESOURCES