Abstract
Phlebopus portentosus can form fruiting bodies, both independently as a saprophyte and in association with plants as an ectomycorrhizal symbiont. It thus offers an excellent model from which to examine the genetic basis of lifestyle adaptations and transitions for mushrooms. This paper reports the genome sequence of a homokaryotic strain of P. portentosus, PP33.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Phlebopus portentosus belongs to the basidiomycete family Boletinellaceae and is distributed in tropical regions in Asia (1–5). Unlike its close relatives in Boletaceae, such as Boletus edulis, P. portentosus can be artificially cultivated (1). Indeed, this species can form mushroom-fruiting bodies, both independently as a saprophyte on artificial substrates and in association with plants as an ectomycorrhizal symbiont (1, 2, 6). This versatile fruiting strategy makes this species an excellent model organism from which to examine the genetic basis of lifestyle adaptations and the potential influences of plant factors on mushroom fruiting. The availability of a whole-genome sequence would lay a solid foundation for investigating these issues.
The genomic DNA from the homokaryotic strain PP33 of P. portentosus was extracted using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol, and three insert libraries (180-bp, 500-bp and 5-kb) were constructed. Genome sequencing was performed by the Illumina HiSeq 2000 system using 100-bp paired-end reads (Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and generated 11.46 Gb of raw data. After filtering out low-quality reads, clean data of 10.90 Gb were assembled using SOAPdenovo2 (7), with a k-mer size of 63. The genome was estimated to be 33.3 Mb, with a G+C content of 48%. The assembly comprised 108 scaffolds with a total length of 30.35 Mb, an N50 size of 1,450,735 bp, and an N90 size of 182,560 bp. RepeatMasker (8) was used to mask repetitive sequences, which accounted for 3.26% of the genome. The genome contained 9 rRNAs, 111 tRNAs, and 13 small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), as revealed by tRNAscan (9) and comparisons with Rfam (10). A total of 8,390 putative protein-coding genes were predicted by Augustus (11), GeneID (12), GeneWise (13), and EVidenceModeler (14). The putative functions of the genes were derived by comparing them against several databases, including NCBI nonredundant, Swiss-Prot, TrEMBL, KEGG, and KOG. Our comparisons showed that 90.17% of the predicted genes had putative functional homologs in these databases.
The carbohydrate metabolism enzymes (CAZyme) were annotated using dbCAN (15). In total, 317 CAZymes were found, including 41 auxiliary activities (AA), 54 carbohydrate-binding modules (CBM), 48 carbohydrate esterases (CE), 107 glycoside hydrolases (GH), 60 glycosyltransferases (GT), and 7 polysaccharide lyases (PL). Interestingly, several key CAZyme families related to the degradation of lignocellulose from plant cell walls (e.g., cellulose, xylan, and pectin) were not found at all or existed only in low copies in the genome of P. portentosus. Some of these CAZyme proteins (e.g., GH7, GH115, CBM1, etc.) play essential roles in saprophytic fungi but are often absent in ectomycorrhizal fungi (16).
Analyses of the transcriptomes of P. portentosus at different developmental stages and their detailed comparisons with other saprophytic, ectomycorrhizal, and pathogenic basidiomycetes would help define and understand the genetic basis for its versatile biotrophic mechanisms.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. JROP00000000. The version described in this paper is version JROP02000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Yunnan Province High-Profile Talents Program (2010CI106) and the funds of the SCI-Tech Innovation System Construction for Tropical Crops of Yunnan Province (no. RF2014).
Footnotes
Citation Cao Y, Zhang Y, Yu Z, Wang P, Tang X, He X, Mi F, Liu C, Yang D, Xu J. 2015. Genome sequence of Phlebopus portentosus strain PP33, a cultivated bolete. Genome Announc 3(2):e00326-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00326-15.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ji K, Cao Y, Zhang C, He M, Liu J, Wang W, Wang Y. 2011. Cultivation of Phlebopus portentosus in southern China. Mycol Prog 10:293–300. doi: 10.1007/s11557-010-0700-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sanmee R, Lumyong S, Lumyong S, Dell B. 2010. In vitro cultivation and fruit body formation of the black bolete, Phlebopus portentosus, a popular edible ectomycorrhizal fungus in Thailand. Mycoscience 51:15–22. doi: 10.1007/S10267-009-0010-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Heinemann P, Rammeloo J. 1982. Observations sur le genre Phlebopus (Boletineae). Mycotaxon 15:384–404. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pegler DN. 1986. Agaric flora of Sri Lanka. In Kew Bulletin Additional Series; London, United Kingdom: HMSO Books. doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(87)80172-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Watling R. 2001. The relationships and possible distributional patterns of boletes in south-east Asia. Mycol Res 105:1440–1448. doi: 10.1017/S0953756201004877. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mortimer PE, Karunarathna SC, Li Q, Gui H, Yang X, Yang X, He J, Ye L, Guo J, Li H, Sysouphanthong P, Zhou D, Xu J, Hyde KD. 2012. Prized edible Asian mushrooms: ecology, conservation and sustainability. Fungal Divers 56:31–47. doi: 10.1007/s13225-012-0196-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W, Yuan J, He G, Chen Y, Pan Q, Liu Y, Tang J, Wu G, Zhang H, Shi Y, Liu Y, Yu C, Wang B, Lu Y, Han C, Cheung DW, Yiu SM, Peng S, Xiaoqian Z, Liu G, Liao X, Li Y, Yang H, Wang J, Lam TW, Wang J. 2012. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 1:18. doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-1-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tarailo-Graovac M, Chen N. 2009. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 4:Unit 4.10. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0410s25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 25:955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.0955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Burge SW, Daub J, Eberhardt R, Tate J, Barquist L, Nawrocki EP, Eddy SR, Gardner PP, Bateman A. 2012. Rfam 11.0: 10 years of RNA families. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D226–D232. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Stanke M, Morgenstern B. 2005. Augustus: a Web server for gene prediction in eukaryotes that allows user-defined constraints. Nucleic Acids Res 33:W465–W467. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Blanco E, Parra G, Guigó R. 2007. Using GeneID to identify genes. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics Chapter 4:Unit 4.3. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0403s18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Birney E, Clamp M, Durbin R. 2004. GeneWise and Genomewise. Genome Res 14:988–995. doi: 10.1101/gr.1865504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Haas BJ, Salzberg SL, Zhu W, Pertea M, Allen JE, Orvis J, White O, Buell CR, Wortman JR. 2008. Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the program to assemble spliced alignments. Genome Biol 9:R7. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yin Y, Mao X, Yang J, Chen X, Mao F, Xu Y. 2012. dbCAN: a Web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 40:W445–W451. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Morin E, Kohler A, Baker AR, Foulongne-Oriol M, Lombard V, Nagy LG, Ohm RA, Patyshakuliyeva A, Brun A, Aerts AL, Bailey AM, Billette C, Coutinho PM, Deakin G, Doddapaneni H, Floudas D, Grimwood J, Hildén K, Kües U, Labutti KM, Lapidus A, Lindquist EA, Lucas SM, Murat C, Riley RW, Salamov AA, Schmutz J, Subramanian V, Wösten HA, Xu J, Eastwood DC, Foster GD, Sonnenberg AS, Cullen D, de Vries RP, Lundell T, Hibbett DS, Henrissat B, Burton KS, Kerrigan RW, Challen MP, Grigoriev IV, Martin F. 2012. Genome sequence of the button mushroom agaricus bisporus reveals mechanisms governing adaptation to a humic-rich ecological niche. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:17501–17506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206847109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
