Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1994 Jun 21;91(13):5823–5827. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.13.5823

A model for reading morphogenetic gradients: autocatalysis and competition at the gene level.

M Kerszberg 1, J P Changeux 1
PMCID: PMC44089  PMID: 8016073

Abstract

How are morphogenetic gradients interpreted in terms of embryonic gene transcription patterns within a syncytium such as the Drosophila blastoderm? We propose a hypothetical model based on recent findings in the molecular biology of transcription factors. The model postulates a morphogen which is itself a spatially distributed transcription factor M or which generates a distribution of such a factor. We posit the existence of an additional, zygotically transcribed "vernier" factor V. M and V form all possible dimers: MM, MV, and VV. These are differentially translocated to the nuclei and bind with various affinities to responsive elements in the V promoter, thereby contributing to activation/inactivation of V transcription. We find four generic regimes. In order of complexity, they are as follows: (i) MM activates V; the M gradient gives rise to a sharp transcriptional boundary for V and to a secondary gradient in the concentration of protein V; (ii) MV activates V; a sharp boundary in transcription and distribution of V arises; (iii) MM and MV compete for binding; a stationary stripe of active V transcription is generated; (iv) MM and VV are in competition; a stripe of V transcription moves from one end of the embryo toward the other and may stop and/or dwindle at an intermediate position. Tentative interpretations in terms of Drosophila genes such as bicoid and hunchback are presented.

Full text

PDF
5823

Images in this article

5824Image
on p.5824

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Akam M. The molecular basis for metameric pattern in the Drosophila embryo. Development. 1987 Sep;101(1):1–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blackwood E. M., Eisenman R. N. Max: a helix-loop-helix zipper protein that forms a sequence-specific DNA-binding complex with Myc. Science. 1991 Mar 8;251(4998):1211–1217. doi: 10.1126/science.2006410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Britten R. J., Davidson E. H. Gene regulation for higher cells: a theory. Science. 1969 Jul 25;165(3891):349–357. doi: 10.1126/science.165.3891.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brockes J. P. Retinoids, homeobox genes, and limb morphogenesis. Neuron. 1989 Apr;2(4):1285–1294. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(89)90066-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Driever W., Nüsslein-Volhard C. A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos. Cell. 1988 Jul 1;54(1):83–93. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90182-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Driever W., Nüsslein-Volhard C. The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner. Cell. 1988 Jul 1;54(1):95–104. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90183-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Driever W., Nüsslein-Volhard C. The bicoid protein is a positive regulator of hunchback transcription in the early Drosophila embryo. Nature. 1989 Jan 12;337(6203):138–143. doi: 10.1038/337138a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Driever W., Thoma G., Nüsslein-Volhard C. Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen. Nature. 1989 Aug 3;340(6232):363–367. doi: 10.1038/340363a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eichele G., Thaller C. Characterization of concentration gradients of a morphogenetically active retinoid in the chick limb bud. J Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;105(4):1917–1923. doi: 10.1083/jcb.105.4.1917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghysen A., Dambly-Chaudiere C. Genesis of the Drosophila peripheral nervous system. Trends Genet. 1989 Aug;5(8):251–255. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(89)90097-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hafen E., Basler K., Edstroem J. E., Rubin G. M. Sevenless, a cell-specific homeotic gene of Drosophila, encodes a putative transmembrane receptor with a tyrosine kinase domain. Science. 1987 Apr 3;236(4797):55–63. doi: 10.1126/science.2882603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Heemskerk J., DiNardo S., Kostriken R., O'Farrell P. H. Multiple modes of engrailed regulation in the progression towards cell fate determination. Nature. 1991 Aug 1;352(6334):404–410. doi: 10.1038/352404a0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoch M., Seifert E., Jäckle H. Gene expression mediated by cis-acting sequences of the Krüppel gene in response to the Drosophila morphogens bicoid and hunchback. EMBO J. 1991 Aug;10(8):2267–2278. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1991.tb07763.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hülskamp M., Tautz D. Gap genes and gradients--the logic behind the gaps. Bioessays. 1991 Jun;13(6):261–268. doi: 10.1002/bies.950130602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ingham P. W., Martinez Arias A. Boundaries and fields in early embryos. Cell. 1992 Jan 24;68(2):221–235. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90467-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jessell T. M., Melton D. A. Diffusible factors in vertebrate embryonic induction. Cell. 1992 Jan 24;68(2):257–270. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90469-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang J., Levine M. Binding affinities and cooperative interactions with bHLH activators delimit threshold responses to the dorsal gradient morphogen. Cell. 1993 Mar 12;72(5):741–752. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90402-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Knust E., Campos-Ortega J. A. The molecular genetics of early neurogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Bioessays. 1989 Oct;11(4):95–100. doi: 10.1002/bies.950110405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kouzarides T., Ziff E. The role of the leucine zipper in the fos-jun interaction. Nature. 1988 Dec 15;336(6200):646–651. doi: 10.1038/336646a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kumar V., Chambon P. The estrogen receptor binds tightly to its responsive element as a ligand-induced homodimer. Cell. 1988 Oct 7;55(1):145–156. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90017-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lewis J., Slack J. M., Wolpert L. Thresholds in development. J Theor Biol. 1977 Apr 7;65(3):579–590. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(77)90216-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. MONOD J., JACOB F. Teleonomic mechanisms in cellular metabolism, growth, and differentiation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1961;26:389–401. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1961.026.01.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Meinhardt H. Hierarchical inductions of cell states: a model for segmentation in Drosophila. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1986;4:357–381. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1986.supplement_4.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Melton D. A. Pattern formation during animal development. Science. 1991 Apr 12;252(5003):234–241. doi: 10.1126/science.1672778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nauber U., Pankratz M. J., Kienlin A., Seifert E., Klemm U., Jäckle H. Abdominal segmentation of the Drosophila embryo requires a hormone receptor-like protein encoded by the gap gene knirps. Nature. 1988 Dec 1;336(6198):489–492. doi: 10.1038/336489a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Noll M. Evolution and role of Pax genes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1993 Aug;3(4):595–605. doi: 10.1016/0959-437x(93)90095-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pankratz M. J., Seifert E., Gerwin N., Billi B., Nauber U., Jäckle H. Gradients of Krüppel and knirps gene products direct pair-rule gene stripe patterning in the posterior region of the Drosophila embryo. Cell. 1990 Apr 20;61(2):309–317. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90811-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Ragsdale C. W., Jr, Brockes J. P. Retinoids and their targets in vertebrate development. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1991 Dec;3(6):928–934. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(91)90109-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Reinke R., Zipursky S. L. Cell-cell interaction in the Drosophila retina: the bride of sevenless gene is required in photoreceptor cell R8 for R7 cell development. Cell. 1988 Oct 21;55(2):321–330. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90055-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schröder C., Tautz D., Seifert E., Jäckle H. Differential regulation of the two transcripts from the Drosophila gap segmentation gene hunchback. EMBO J. 1988 Sep;7(9):2881–2887. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03145.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Small S., Kraut R., Hoey T., Warrior R., Levine M. Transcriptional regulation of a pair-rule stripe in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1991 May;5(5):827–839. doi: 10.1101/gad.5.5.827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Smith J. C. Dorso-ventral patterning in the neural tube. Curr Biol. 1993 Sep 1;3(9):582–585. doi: 10.1016/0960-9822(93)90003-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Struhl G., Struhl K., Macdonald P. M. The gradient morphogen bicoid is a concentration-dependent transcriptional activator. Cell. 1989 Jun 30;57(7):1259–1273. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90062-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sun S. C., Ganchi P. A., Ballard D. W., Greene W. C. NF-kappa B controls expression of inhibitor I kappa B alpha: evidence for an inducible autoregulatory pathway. Science. 1993 Mar 26;259(5103):1912–1915. doi: 10.1126/science.8096091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Tautz D. Regulation of the Drosophila segmentation gene hunchback by two maternal morphogenetic centres. Nature. 1988 Mar 17;332(6161):281–284. doi: 10.1038/332281a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Thayer M. J., Tapscott S. J., Davis R. L., Wright W. E., Lassar A. B., Weintraub H. Positive autoregulation of the myogenic determination gene MyoD1. Cell. 1989 Jul 28;58(2):241–248. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90838-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tomlinson A., Ready D. F. Cell fate in the Drosophila ommatidium. Dev Biol. 1987 Sep;123(1):264–275. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90448-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tomlinson A. Sevenless and its bride: a marriage of molecules? Curr Biol. 1991 Jun;1(3):132–134. doi: 10.1016/0960-9822(91)90209-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Walther C., Gruss P. Pax-6, a murine paired box gene, is expressed in the developing CNS. Development. 1991 Dec;113(4):1435–1449. doi: 10.1242/dev.113.4.1435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Weintraub H., Davis R., Tapscott S., Thayer M., Krause M., Benezra R., Blackwell T. K., Turner D., Rupp R., Hollenberg S. The myoD gene family: nodal point during specification of the muscle cell lineage. Science. 1991 Feb 15;251(4995):761–766. doi: 10.1126/science.1846704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wolpert L. Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J Theor Biol. 1969 Oct;25(1):1–47. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(69)80016-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Xue D., Tu Y., Chalfie M. Cooperative interactions between the Caenorhabditis elegans homeoproteins UNC-86 and MEC-3. Science. 1993 Sep 3;261(5126):1324–1328. doi: 10.1126/science.8103239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES