Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2014 Oct 14;12(12):1487–1499. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2014.970634

Melioidosis: Molecular Aspects of Pathogenesis

Joshua K Stone 1, David DeShazer 2, Paul J Brett 1, Mary N Burtnick 1,*
PMCID: PMC4409121  NIHMSID: NIHMS681828  PMID: 25312349

SUMMARY

Burkholderia pseudomallei is a Gram-negative bacterium that causes melioidosis, a multifaceted disease that is highly endemic in Southeast Asia and northern Australia. This facultative intracellular pathogen possesses a large genome that encodes a wide array of virulence factors that promote survival in vivo by manipulating host cell processes and disarming elements of the host immune system. Antigens and systems that play key roles in B. pseudomallei virulence include capsular polysaccharide, lipopolysaccharide, adhesins, specialized secretion systems, actin-based motility and various secreted factors. This review provides an overview of the current and steadily expanding knowledge regarding the molecular mechanisms used by this organism to survive within a host and their contribution to the pathogenesis of melioidosis.

Keywords: Burkholderia pseudomallei, melioidosis, pathogenesis, virulence factors, facultative intracellular pathogen, capsule, lipopolysaccharide, secretion systems

INTRODUCTION

Burkholderia pseudomallei, the etiologic agent of melioidosis, is an environmental saprophyte found in moist soils and surface waters in tropical and subtropical regions. This Gram-negative bacterium can be acquired by humans via inhalation, inoculation, or ingestion, with the highest number of infections occurring during the rainy season [1]. Melioidosis is highly endemic in Southeast Asia and northern Australia although scattered cases have been described globally [2]. Based on increasing numbers of case reports from various areas of the world including South America, Africa, and India, melioidosis is considered to be an emerging infectious disease. Human cases that have occurred in temperate regions have, for the most part, been attributed to recent travel to endemic areas.

The clinical presentations of melioidosis are varied with manifestations ranging from localized abscess formation to acute pneumonia and overwhelming septicemia [1,3]. Risk factors, most commonly diabetes mellitus, alcoholism, and chronic pulmonary disease, are present in up to 80% of patients. Acute cases typically present within 1-21 days after infection while chronic cases are characterized by less severe symptoms that persist for weeks or months [1,4]. B. pseudomallei is resistant to numerous antibiotics so treatment is prolonged, requiring antibiotic regimens of up to six months for clearance of infections [5,6]. In addition, recrudescence is common, occurring in up to ~9% of patients [4]. Mortality can be high, ranging from 14% in northern Australia to 43% in northeast Thailand, and case fatality rates are as high as 61.5% in Cambodia [4,7,8]. Diagnosis of melioidosis can be challenging and no vaccine is currently available [1]. Further complicating matters, B. pseudomallei is categorized as a U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Tier 1 select agent, restricting work to select agent compliant biosafety level 3 containment facilities [9].

The genome of B. pseudomallei is large at 7.2 Mb and encodes for numerous virulence factors [10]. Included amongst these are surface polysaccharides such as capsular polysaccharide (CPS) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) which are involved in inhibiting opsonophagocytosis and conferring resistance to killing by host complement [11], and specialized secretion systems, in particular the cluster 3 type III secretion system (T3SS-3) and cluster 1 type VI secretion system (T6SS-1), that facilitate optimal survival and growth of the organism within host cells [12]. Additional virulence factors including adhesins, flagella, various secreted proteins (e.g. phospholipases and proteases) and secondary metabolites have also been described. Many of the virulence associated systems expressed by B. pseudomallei appear to be regulated by two component systems (TCSs) or quorum sensing (QS) suggesting that environmental cues and bacterial cross-talk may mediate activation of some of these factors.

In this review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms used by B. pseudomallei to evade constitutive immune defenses and to then survive and replicate inside phagocytic and nonphagocytic cells. As a facultative intracellular pathogen, the life cycle of B. pseudomallei involves adherence and entry into host cells, escape from the phagosome, replication within the cytosol and spread to neighboring cells (Figure 1). Based on the current literature, it appears that various adhesins mediate attachment to non-phagocytic cells and that cell contact triggers T3SS-3 expression. Once inside a eukaryotic cell, the iron limiting environment of the phagosome appears to lead to activation of the VirAG TCS and T6SS-1 transcription. T3SS-3 effectors enable escape from phagosomes and once free in the cytosol, B. pseudomallei can polymerize host actin and propel itself throughout the cell. Upon contact with host cell membranes T6SS-1 mediates membrane fusion with adjacent cells, resulting in multinucleated giant cell (MNGC) formation. Lysis of MNGCs results in release of the intracellular bacteria and can lead to plaque formation in vitro.

Figure 1. Proposed model of the intracellular lifestyle of B. pseudomallei in phagocytic cells.

Figure 1

Following entry in host cells, B. pseudomallei (Bp) rapidly escapes from the phagosome, enters into the cytosol where it can replicate, polymerize host cell actin (red), spread cell to cell, and induce host cell fusion resulting in the formation of multinucleated giant cells (MNGC). Within the cytosol B. pseudomallei can activate pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and evade host cell autophagy. Gene products and systems that are important at various points are indicated in blue text. VirAG senses a signal within the phagosome that activates T6SS-1 gene expression; T3SS-3 is required for escape from the phagosome; BimA facilitates actin-based motility and actin tail formation; BopA is important for avoidance of autophagy; TssM interferes with host cell signaling and activation of PRRs; T6SS-1 is critical for MNGC formation.

SURFACE POLYSACCHARIDES

B. pseudomallei strains express a number of cell surface exposed polysaccharides that play important roles in the pathogenesis of melioidosis. The organism is capable of expressing at least five different CPS antigens as well as the O-polysaccharide (OPS) portion of LPS [13-15]. Four CPS biosynthetic gene clusters (encoding for CPS I, II, II and IV) and one OPS biosynthetic gene cluster have been identified in the B. pseudomallei genome [10,16]. Of the CPS antigens described to date, only CPS I (encoded by the wcb gene cluster, BPSL2786-BPSL2810; commonly referred to as CPS) has been shown to play a major role in virulence. This antigen is an unbranched homopolymer consisting of monosaccharide repeats having the structure →3)-2-O-acetyl-6-deoxy-β-d-manno-heptopyranose-(1→ and is expressed by both B. pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei, the causative agent of glanders, and some strains of Burkholderia thailandensis, a closely related non-pathogenic environmental saprophyte [15,17]. Expression of CPS I is up-regulated in response to normal human serum (NHS) and this antigen has been shown to reduce phagocytosis by host cells by preventing complement factor C3b deposition on the surface of the bacterium [11,18]. B. pseudomallei CPS I mutants have been shown to exhibit significantly attenuated virulence, with a >10,000-fold increase in the 50% lethal dose (LD50), in comparison to wild type strains in Syrian hamsters and mice [18,19]. Recent studies have demonstrated that CPS I is both a protective antigen and promising vaccine candidate [20,21]. Investigations focused on examining the function of the individual ORFs within the wcb operon may provide a better understanding of the mechanism of CPS I biosynthesis and export in B. pseudomallei and further insights into the role of this important antigen in pathogenesis [22].

CPS III (BPSS1825-BPSS1835) is composed of galactose, glucose, mannose, rhamnose, and xylose residues and has been shown to be down-regulated in the presence of NHS and in animal tissues, but up-regulated in water suggesting a role in environmental survival [15]. A CPS III mutant retained wild type virulence in hamsters, but was attenuated in BALB/c mice, an observation that could be reflective of differences in animal models [15,23]. Little work has examined the roles of CPS II (BPSS0417-BPSS0429) and CPS IV (BPSL2769-BPSL2785) in the pathogenesis of melioidosis. Growth of B. pseudomallei in numerous different laboratory conditions did not induce CPS IV expression, however, CPS II was up-regulated in response to divalent cation supplementation of TSB-DC growth media [24]. Virulence testing of CPS II mutants in BALB/c mice demonstrated an increased mean time to death compared to the wild type strain [23]. In addition to these CPS antigens, a 1,3-linked mannan CPS as well as a tetrameric exopolysaccharide composed of three repeating galactose and a Kdo residue are also produced by B. pseudomallei, but their genetic loci and functions are unknown [13,25,26].

Three B. pseudomallei OPS types have been described: the typical and predominant type A as well as the atypical and serologically related types B and B2 [27]. Rough strains lacking OPS have also been reported. Type A OPS is best described as an unbranched polymer consisting of disaccharide repeats having the structure →3)-β-d-glucopyranose-(1→3)-6-deoxy-α-l-talopyranose-(1→ in which the 6-deoxy-α-l-talopyranose residues are variably substituted with O-acetyl and O-methyl modifications [14,28]. The presence of this moiety confers serum resistance and enables B. pseudomallei to grow in 10-30% NHS while rough type strains are rapidly killed [16]. Consistent with this function, mutant strains lacking type A OPS exhibited LD50s ~10-fold higher in hamsters and guinea pigs and ~100-fold higher in rats relative to the wild-type strains [16]. Passive protection studies in animals using anti-OPS monoclonal antibodies indicate that this carbohydrate moiety is a protective antigen and potential vaccine candidate [20]. The structures and roles of the type B and B2 OPS are unknown but would be predicted to function similarly to the type A OPS as strains expressing type B are able to grow in 30% NHS while type B2 strains are susceptible to killing [27]. Collectively, these studies indicate that surface polysaccharides play important roles in resisting host innate immune killing mechanisms and likely help to facilitate survival of B. pseudomallei during the early stages of infection. In addition, both CPS and LPS represent attractive targets for the development of future countermeasures.

ADHERENCE TO HOST CELLS

Bacteria commonly use type IV pili (TFP) or fimbriae to adhere to eukaryotic cells. Eight TFP gene clusters have been identified in the B. pseudomallei genome and three of these (TFP1, 4 and 7) have been preliminarily characterized. Deletion of TFP1 (pilA, BPSL0782) reduced adherence to human epithelial cell lines RPMI-2650, A549, and BEAS2-B, with adherence nearly abolished to the latter two [29]. A subsequent study using ME-180 human cervical cancer cells found that PilA mediated formation of microcolonies of B. pseudomallei which in turn adhered to the eukaryotic cells [30]. Two genes in the TFP4 pili cluster, pilW and pilV (BPSL2754-2755), were required for full virulence of B. pseudomallei in a BALB/c mouse model, however, their role in mediating adherence to host cells was not determined [31]. The TFP7 protein PilV (BPSS1593) was found to be highly immunogenic in mice suggesting it is surface-exposed during infection [32]. Interestingly, however, PilV failed to induce protective immunity in mice. A recent study demonstrated that the TFP7 gene cluster (BPSS1593-BPSS1602) is orthologous to the R64 plasmid thin pilus and to a Salmonella enterica TFP, which aids in adhesion to intestinal epithelial cells and to other bacteria via biofilm formation [33,34]. It is likely that TFP7 may act in a similar manner although this remains to be experimentally determined.

Autotransporters are a large family of Type V secreted proteins that are bound in the outer membrane and contain an effector domain, and often acts as adhesins. These proteins are subdivided into classical or trimeric autotransporter adhesins (TAAs). The B. pseudomallei genome contains one confirmed classical autotransporter (BcaA), one predicted classical autotransporter (BPSL2237) and nine predicted TAAs, six of which display homology to the adhesin YadA of Yersinia enterocolitica [35-39]. Two important TAA adhesins expressed by B. pseudomallei are BoaA and BoaB [35]. When cloned and expressed in E. coli, both BoaA and BoaB increased adhesion to A549, HEp2, and NHBE epithelial cells. Accordingly, B. pseudomallei boaA and boaB mutants exhibited decreased adherence to these cell lines and no difference was found in the rate of phagocytosis. A double boaA/boaB mutant adhered to host cells at levels comparable to those for each single mutant, and was also phagocytosed equivalently. Curiously, this double mutant had a 60% decrease in survival within J774.1 murine macrophages [35]. Similar experiments conducted with BpaC demonstrated that expression of this TAA in E. coli increased adherence to A549, HEp2, and NHBE cells 5-7 fold [40]. A B. pseudomallei bpaC mutant had no change in adherence to A549 or HEp2 cells, but exhibited a 61% reduction in adherence to NHBE cells. There was no change in invasion of epithelial cells, phagocytosis by macrophages, or intracellular replication suggesting that BpaC may be specific for attachment to ciliated mucosal epithelial cells such as NHBE [40]. These findings are in contrast to those of Campos et al who found that a bpaC mutant displayed reduced adherence (~10-fold) to A549 cells [38]. It is possible that these differences could be attributable to culture methods, length of infection time, or the nature of the bpaC mutation since both studies used derivatives of B. pseudomallei 1026b [40]. Another TAA, BbfA (BPSS1439 or BpaF), was shown to play a role in microcolony formation, biofilm production, and adherence when grown on glass coverslips. While no change in motility or intracellular replication within A549 and J774.2 cells was observed, the BbfA mutant was attenuated for virulence in BALB/c mice [36]. Taken together, these data suggest that adherence of B. pseudomallei to host cells is multi-factorial and that further investigations will be necessary to more fully understand the specific role(s) of each of these proteins during interactions with host cells.

TYPE III SECRETION SYSTEM

Type III secretion systems (T3SSs) are syringe-like mechanisms used by Gram-negative pathogens to translocate effector proteins directly into target cells and are often associated with virulence [41]. The B. pseudomallei genome encodes three T3SS gene clusters, two of which are homologous to systems found in the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum, and a third (T3SS-3, bsa locus, BPSS1520-BPSS1554) which is homologous to the Inv/Mxi-Spa T3SS of Salmonella typhimurium (SPI-1 T3SS) and Shigella flexneri [42]. Several studies have shown that T3SS-3 expression is triggered following contact with host cells and has been associated with invasion of non-phagocytic cells, rapid escape from endocytic vacuoles, and virulence [43-46].

T3SS-3 structural proteins BsaQ (BPSS1543) and BsaZ (BPSS1534) are predicted to be components of the integral membrane export apparatus necessary for secretion of effectors. Disruption of bsaQ prevented secretion of BopE and BipD, resulted in reduced invasion and plaque formation in A549 cells as well as decreased phagosomal escape and MNGC formation in J774A.1 macrophages [47]. In contrast, no differences were observed in invasion, replication, or vacuolar escape in human HEK293T cells [48]. Stevens et al showed that a bsaZ mutant was unable to escape phagosomes and thus could not replicate intracellularly or form actin filaments in J774.2 macrophages [43]. This mutant was later found to be capable of delayed vacuolar escape, limited replication and MNGC formation in RAW 264.7 macrophages [49]. These data are consistent with experiments demonstrating that bsaZ mutants exhibit attenuated virulence in mice and hamsters [45,46].

To date, at least five putative T3SS-3 effector proteins have been described in B. pseudomallei including BopE (BPSS1525), BopA (BPSS1524), BopB (BPSS1514), BopC (BPSS1516) and CHBP (BPSS1385). BopE, the first effector to be characterized, is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor that targets Cdc42 and Rac1 and induces actin rearrangements that aid in bacterial invasion of non-phagocytic cells. Ectopic expression of BopE in HeLa cells resulted in actin polymerization and ruffling of host cell membranes [44]. A B. pseudomallei bopE mutant exhibited reduced invasion of HeLa cells compared to the wild type strain, however, no change was observed in its ability to escape from phagosomes, replicate, or form actin tails in J774.2 cells or murine bone-derived macrophages, and full virulence was retained in mice and hamsters [43,44,46,50]. These findings suggest that although BopE may promote invasion of non-phagocytic cells, this protein plays only a minor role in virulence.

Investigations focused on BopA have revealed that this effector protein is involved in avoidance of host autophagy since a B. pseudomallei bopA mutant showed increased co-localization with autophagosomal microtubule-associated protein light chain 3 (LC3) compared to the wild type strain following infection of RAW 264.7 macrophages [51,52]. The bopA mutant also exhibited delayed phagosomal escape and reduced intracellular survival, but was fully virulent in hamsters [46,51,52]. Deletion of bopB, a predicted phosphatase, had no effect on intracellular growth or actin tail formation in J774.2 macrophages and did not attenuate virulence in BALB/c mice [45]. A bopC mutant displayed decreased invasion of A549 cells, and reduced phagosomal escape and intracellular survival in J774A.1 macrophages, however, no change was noted in actin tail or MNGC formation [53].

The CHBP effector protein is encoded for outside of the T3SS-3 gene cluster and is a cycle inhibiting factor (Cif) homolog that is predicted to be a cysteine protease. CHBP secretion was shown to occur following infection of human U937 macrophages with B. pseudomallei, require a functional T3SS-3, and was postulated to be host cell contact dependent [54]. A chbP mutant survived at wild type levels in U937 cells, retained the ability to form actin tails, and induced MNGC formation in J774A.1 macrophages [54]. Interestingly, following infection of HeLa cells the plaque forming efficiency of the chbP mutant was significantly decreased, cytotoxicity was reduced, and smaller plaques were consistently observed in comparison to the wild type [54]. When ectopically expressed in HEK293T and HeLa cells, CHBP induced actin stress fiber formation and arrested the cell cycle at the G2/M boundary by deamidation of Gln40 in ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins [55-57].

The T3SS-3 translocator proteins BipB, BipC and BipD facilitate the delivery of effectors proteins into host cells. A B. pseudomallei bipD mutant exhibited significantly reduced invasion of HeLa cells, inefficient endosomal escape, and decreased intracellular survival and actin tail formation in J774.2 and RAW 264.7 macrophages [43-45]. A bipB mutant was unable to invade A549 cells, did not spread between HeLa cells, and failed induce MNGC formation or apoptosis in J774A.1 macrophages. Consistent with these phenotypes, both bipD and bipB mutants were highly attenuated for virulence in an intranasal BALB/c mouse model [45,58]. Collectively, these data suggest that while T3SS-3 promotes invasion of non-phagocytic cells, it appears that a key a function of this system is to facilitate rapid escape of B. pseudomallei from endocytic vacuoles allowing entry into host cell cytosol.

TYPE VI SECRETION SYSTEMS

The T6SS is a relatively recently described secretion system resembling an inverted bacteriophage-like structure that functions to deliver effector proteins directly into eukaryotic and prokaryotic target cells [59]. T6SS gene clusters typically encode 15-20 proteins involved in the assembly, structure and function of the system. Two conserved components of the T6SS apparatus, hemolysin co-regulated protein (Hcp) and valine glycine repeat protein (VgrG), are predicted to form a spear-like structure that is propelled into target cells to facilitate effector delivery [60]. In many instances VgrG proteins also function as effector molecules.

The B. pseudomallei genome harbors six type VI secretion system (T6SS) gene clusters. At present, only T6SS-1 (BPSS1494-BPSS1511) has been shown to play a role in virulence in animals [12,61,62]. While T6SS-1 is not typically expressed during the routine culture of B. pseudomallei in rich media, it is expressed in minimal media and following uptake by host cells, and is required for virulence in both mice and hamsters [61-65]. Several studies have shown that disruption of this system significantly influences the intracellular behavior of the organism. Notably, hcp1 (BPSS1498) deletion mutants exhibited attenuated intracellular growth in RAW 264.7 cells, defects in actin-based motility, an inability to stimulate MNGC formation and a corresponding decrease in macrophage cytotoxicity [61]. Similar phenotypes were observed with tssF (BPSS1504) and tssK (BPSS1509) mutants which displayed impaired MNGC formation in macrophages, reduced plaque formation in Ptk2 cells, and attenuated virulence in BALB/c mice [65,66].

Recent studies focused on B. pseudomallei VgrG1 (BPSS1503, also known as VgrG5) indicate that the C-terminal extended region of this protein is required for MNGC formation and virulence in mice [61,67]. Additional studies with B. thailandensis a VgrG1-GFP fusion protein have revealed that T6SS-1 localizes to the bacterial poles, either with or opposite to actin tail formation [68]. Consistent with these observations, Toesca et al showed that B. pseudomallei vgrG1 mutants escaped from endosomes in HEK 293 cells and could polymerize actin [67]. Complementation of a B. pseudomallei vgrG1 mutant with orthologous B. mallei, B. thailandensis, or Burkholderia oklahomensis vgrG1 genes restored the ability to induce MNGC formation [67]. Based on this evidence, it has been postulated that the C-terminal domain (CTD) of VgrG1 facilitates host cell fusion, however, the specific mechanism and factors involved remain to be determined. Identification of additional T6SS-1 associated effectors may provide insight into how T6SS-1 is modulating host cell processes to enable bacterial proliferation.

REGULATION OF T3SS-3 AND T6SS-1

In general, the expression of T3SSs and T6SSs is precisely regulated so that these systems are only expressed when appropriate. In keeping with this notion, a complex regulatory cascade involving multiple proteins governing the coordinated expression of T3SS-3 and T6SS-1 in B. pseudomallei has been identified and partially characterized [64,69]. A TetR family regulator designated BspR (BPSL1105) is encoded by neither gene cluster but is believed to act on the T3SS-3 regulator BprP (BPSS1553). BprP then activates transcription of T3SS-3 structural components and the regulator BsaN which, along with the chaperone BicA, activates the expression of secreted effectors such as BopE and the AraC family transcriptional regulator BprC [69]. BsaN/BicA also activate BprABD, predicted transcriptional regulators within the T3SS-3 gene cluster whose targets are unknown [42]. Both BprC and the VirAG two-component system positively regulate expression of T6SS-1 [61,64,69].

Activation of this signal cascade is dependent upon contact between the bacterium and eukaryotic cells [64]. T6SS-1 transcription occurs after the bacteria has entered the host cell and is dependent on VirAG, with BprC activating transcription of tssA (BPSS1496) and tssB (BPSS1497), encoding predicted structural components required for Hcp1 secretion [64]. It has been hypothesized that VirA may recognize nutrient deprived conditions found in the phagosome, activating VirG and the transcription of T6SS-1 genes. This is supported by the finding that virAG is expressed during growth of B. pseudomallei in minimal media [63]. Furthermore, the observation that T6SS-1 expression is negatively regulated by iron and zinc suggests that divalent cation depletion may serve as a signal for expression of this system [63]. This observation is consistent with the finding that B. mallei T6SS-1 expression is activated within the iron-limiting environment of the phagosome [70].

OTHER SECRETED PROTEINS

B. pseudomallei secretes a multitude of proteins with numerous different activities. The importance of some of these secreted products has been examined in the context of host cells or in animal models of infection. One recently identified protein that has gained considerable attention is TssM (BPSS1512), a potent deubiquitinase that is secreted inside host cells. The tssM gene is physically linked to both the T3SS-3 and T6SS-1 gene clusters and is co-regulated with T6SS-1, but neither system is involved in TssM export [71]. It has recently been shown that secretion of TssM is instead dependent on a functional type II secretion system (T2SS) [72]. When secreted inside macrophages, TssM interferes with the toll-like receptor (TLR) mediated NF-κB signaling pathways associated with innate immune responses [71]. In B. mallei, which has an identical copy of tssM, expression was found to occur exclusively within macrophages; however, deletion of this gene had no effect on intracellular survival and replication [73]. Consistent with these findings, B. pseudomallei tssM mutants were hyper-inflammatory in mice and resulted in a decreased time to death indicating that this protein may manipulate host immune responses to the benefit of the bacteria [71].

Several proteases and phospholipases have been described which are secreted by the T2SS [72,74]. MprA (BPSS1993) is a serine metalloprotease that is responsible for most of the extracellular proteolytic activity of B. pseudomallei [72,75]. Three phospholipase C paralogs are present in the B. pseudomallei genome, plcN1 (BPSL2403), plcN2 (BPSL0338), and plcN3 (BPSS0067). PlcN1 and PlcN2 are acidic proteins which contribute to plaque formation in HeLa cells [76]. A plcN2 mutant also demonstrated reduced cytotoxicity in RAW 264.7 macrophages, however, no change was observed in MNGC formation or cell lysis [76]. PlcN3 is a basic protein and deletion of plcN3 resulted in attenuation in a hamster model [77]. BPSL2198 is a phospholipase A2-like protein that when ectopically expressed in HeLa cells localized to the nuclear periphery and caused cell death [78]. Additionally, BPSL1549 or Burkholderia Lethal Factor 1 (BLF1), is a glutamine deamidase which destroys the RNA helicase ability of elongation factor 4A at the start of translation [79]. While the mechanism of its secretion is uncertain, BLF1 is highly cytotoxic toward host cells and lethal when administered to BALB/c mice.

SECONDARY METABOLITES

The B. pseudomallei genome contains a large number of biosynthetic gene clusters encoding polyketide- and nonribosomal peptide-based small molecules [80,81]. Many of these gene clusters are not expressed in vitro and their biological functions have not been identified. Recently, Biggins et al. have demonstrated that several of these small molecules are critical for Burkholderia virulence [80,81]. They devised methods to artificially express these large gene clusters in vitro, structurally characterize the encoded natural products, and test the virulence of mutant derivatives in animal models of infection. The B. pseudomallei 1026b mpnA-E genes (BP1026B_II1742-1746) encode malleipeptin A and malleipeptin B, 12 amino acid lipopeptides with a novel peptide sequences and a rarely seen 13-membered terminal lactone [80]. The malleipeptins function as biosurfactants and are critical for virulence in BALB/c mice. The B. pseudomallei 1026b syrA-I genes (BP1026B_II1345-1353), encode glidobactin C and deoxyglidobactin C. Syrbactins are 20S proteasome inhibitors that have been found in plant pathogenic bacteria, but glidobactin C and deoxyglidobactin C are the first syrbactins described in a mammalian bacterial pathogen [80]. A mutant strain that could not synthesize the syrbactins was severely attenuated in BALB/c mice, suggesting that these molecules play an important role in B. pseudomallei virulence. Finally, the malA-M gene cluster (BP1026B_II0328-II0340) encodes a polyketide synthase-derived cytotoxic siderophore termed malleilactone [81]. B. thailandensis strains harboring mutations in the mal gene cluster are less virulent in the Caenorhabditis elegans nematode and the Dictyostelium discoideum co-culture models of infection, suggesting that malleilactone is a Burkholderia virulence determinant.

INTRACELLULAR MOTILITY

Once B. pseudomallei has escaped from phagosomes/endosomes and entered into the cytosol, it is able to utilize actin-based motility to move about the host cell. It is known that binding and polymerization of host actin by B. pseudomallei involves the polarly localized protein BimA, but the mechanism(s) that facilitate this process appear to be distinct from those described for other intracellular pathogens [82,83]. Mutagenesis of bimA resulted in abolishment of actin tail formation in J774.2 cells and plaque formation in HEK293 and A549 cells, but had no effect on vacuolar escape [84-86]. When BimA was expressed in HeLa cells, monolayer detachment was observed and cellular shape was spherically distorted. Actin was found to polymerize with BimA and corresponded to a decrease in actin stress fiber formation [86].

Additional gene products have been identified which may contribute to actin-based motility in B. pseudomallei including BPSL1057F1, BPSL1528, and BPSS1727 [31]. Revised genome annotation of B. pseudomallei K96243 identified a novel gene, BPSL1057F1, which contains a putative signal sequence for extracellular secretion. A marked increase in actin stress fiber formation, very similar in effect to BopE, was observed when BPSL1057F1 was expressed in HeLa cells [31]. A mutant of the hypothetical protein BPSL1528 had severely reduced actin tail formation in HeLa cells while expression of the hemagglutanin FhaB (BPSS1727) in J774.2 macrophages yielded actin projections stretching towards adjacent cells [65,87]. The BPSL1528 mutant also displayed reduced swimming motility and intracellular growth in phagocytic and non-phagocytic cells, suggesting BPSL1528 may act pleiotropically in a regulatory manner [65].

While BimA facilitates actin polymerization and intracellular motility in Southeast Asian isolates of B. pseudomallei, a flagellar gene cluster designated BTFC (fla2) that is present in B. thailandensis and most B. pseudomallei isolates of Australian origin may serve a similar function [88]. French et al demonstrated that fla2 encodes for lateral flagella which enable rapid intracellular motility by B. thailandensis that can compensate for the lack of BimA-mediated actin-based motility [84]. Inactivation of fla2 resulted in reduced plaque diameter in infected HEK293 cells while a fla2/bimA double mutant was unable to induce plaque formation [84]. Although B. thailandensis carries a different bimA allele (bimABt) than B. pseudomallei (bimABp), bimABt can complement B. pseudomallei actin polymerization when bimABp is deleted [89]. B. mallei contains a different bimA allele (bimABm) which is also found in 12% of Australian B. pseudomallei isolates (54% ID to bimABp) [90]. The implications of these findings are unclear, although Australian B. pseudomallei strains with the bimABp allele are more likely to cause pneumonia and strains with the bimABm allele are more likely to cause encephalomyelitis [91].

MNGC FORMATION

MNGC formation has been observed in both phagocytic and non-phagocytic cell lines infected with B. pseudomallei as well as in tissues isolated from melioidosis patients. The role of MNGCs in pathogenesis is unknown, but it has been speculated that these structures facilitate bacterial survival and replication, yielding a direct path to neighboring cells while avoiding extracellular immune responses [3,82,83]. This phenomenon is associated with actin-based motility and results from host cell fusion events. In support of this, French et al demonstrated that a B. pseudomalleibimA mutant failed to stimulate MNGC and plaque formation in HEK293 cells [84]. As discussed above, a functional T6SS-1 is required for Burkholderia-induced MNGC formation, and current evidence suggests that the CTD of VgrG1 plays a critical role in this process. While it has been postulated that the effector function associated with VgrG1 may be as a “fusogenic factor”, the exact mechanism(s) of T6SS-1 mediated cell fusion remains to be elucidated.

Several additional genes have been linked to B. pseudomallei-induced MNGC formation although their specific roles in the process are not well understood. The RNA polymerase sigma subunit rpoS (BPSL1505) has been implicated in this process as a B. pseudomallei rpoS mutant stimulated reduced MNGC formation (3%) in comparison to the wild-type strain (17%) in RAW 264.7 cells. It is possible that RpoS may play a role in regulating the transcription of genes whose products are involved in promoting macrophage fusion [84,92]. Ecotopic expression of BPSL0590 and BPSL0591, putative homologs of Photorhabdus luminescens insecticidal toxins, in J774.2 macrophages induced MNGC formation and nuclear apoptosis [87]. BPSS0945, a putative exported peptidase, localized to the nucleus when expressed in HeLa cells and resulted in increased MNGC formation. This protein also contains a human microtubule-associated serine/threonine kinase-like (MASTL) domain; MASTL proteins aid in facilitation of mitosis, anaphase, and cytokinesis, which could implicate host cell growth and expansion as ideal conditions for MNGC formation [78]. The senescence marker LfpA (BPSS2074) was able to modify macrophages to resemble osteoclasts; these osteoclastic markers are also detected on MNGCs [93]. A lipoate-protein ligase lipB mutant (BPSL0413) did not affect intracellular growth, but had a delayed time to plaque formation and was unable to grow in iron deplete media conditions. This protein is proposed to modify proteins with lipoyl groups, possibly in a regulatory manner [65].

INTRACELLULAR SURVIVAL

Host cells, particularly macrophages, are capable of killing intracellular pathogens through a variety of mechanisms including the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen intermediates (RNI), phagolysosome fusion and autophagy. While T3SS-3 plays an important role in facilitating phagosomal escape and avoidance of autophagy, B. pseudomallei possesses additional mechanisms to contend with exposure to potent ROS such as superoxide (O2−) and RNI such as nitric oxide (NO). These include strategies ranging from the production of specific proteins to combat oxidative stress to suppression of pathways that normally lead to the generation of RNI.

Bacterial resistance to killing via superoxide involves a family of enzymes designated superoxide dismutases (SOD) which convert O2 to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), a less harmful compound that can be detoxified by other enzymes (e.g. KatG or AhpC). In B. pseudomallei SodC (BPSL1001), a Cu2+- and Zn2+-dependent SOD, confers resistance against exogenous O2, contributing to survival within J774A.1 macrophages and virulence in BALB/c mice [94]. A SodB homolog (BPSL0880) has also been identified in B. pseudomallei, but remains to be investigated. Enzymes that degrade H2O2 such as KatG (a catalase/peroxidase), AhpC (an alkyl hydroperoxide reductase), and DpsA (a DNA-binding protein) have been preliminarily characterized and shown to mediate resistance of B. pseudomallei to oxidative stress [95-97]. In addition to providing protection against oxidative stress, AhpC also helps B. pseudomallei to evade killing by RNI [96]. Expression of these genes (katG, dpsA and ahpC) was shown to be dependent on the global regulator OxyR, and consistent with this, B. pseudomallei oxyR mutants were hypersensitive to H2O2 [95-98].

In activated macrophages, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is responsible for generating high levels of nitric oxide (NO) which is rapidly oxidized to nitrogen dioxide, dinitrogen trioxide, and when superoxide is present, peroxynitrite is also generated. All of these RNI play important roles in the clearance of intracellular bacteria. Previous studies have demonstrated that following uptake by murine macrophage cell lines, B. pseudomallei fails to activate expression of interferon-beta (IFN-β), iNOS, and NO production [99,100]. By interfering with RNI generating responses the organism essentially promotes its own survival within host cells. Recent studies aimed at understanding how B. pseudomallei subverts these defense mechanisms have revealed that this phenomenon is complex and involves modulation of the expression of several host proteins including the sterile-α and armadillo motif (SARM)-containing protein, a known negative regulator of the MyD88-independent (TRIF dependent) pathway, and signal regulatory protein alpha (SIRPα), a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor signaling [99,101,102]. By up-regulating SARM and preventing down-regulation of SIRPα, B. pseudomallei effectively inhibited MyD88-independent signaling and ultimately lead to the suppression IFN-β and iNOS expression. Elucidation of the mechanisms used by B. pseudomallei to interfere with RNI production will be important for understanding how the organism manipulates host signaling pathways in order to escape killing by macrophages.

Additional factors that have been identified in B. pseudomallei that may help to facilitate survival of the organism in host cells include an ecotin homolog (eco), a macrophage infectivity potentiator (Mip)-like protein (BPSS1823) with peptidyl-prolyl isomerase (PPIase) activity belonging to the FK-506-binding protein (FKBP) family, a disulfide oxidoreductase (dsbA), and a second FKBP homolog (BPSL0918) lacking PPIase activity. In E. coli ecotin is a periplasmic protein which inhibits host serine proteases and is involved in resisting the degradative enzymes found in lysosomes. A B. pseudomallei eco homolog (BPSL1054) was required for replication in J774A.1 macrophages and full virulence in an intraperitoneal BALB/c mouse model [103]. A B. pseudomallei mutant in the Mip-like protein BPSS1823, proposed to play a role in resisting phagolysosomal degradation, demonstrated reduced growth in J774A.1 macrophages and A549 cells, and was attenuated in BALB/c mice. In addition, the mutant displayed increased sensitivity to low-pH conditions and decreased protease secretion and flagella production [104]. Likewise, B. pseudomallei dsbA (BPSL0381) and BPSL0918 mutants were attenuated in both macrophages and in BALB/c mice [105,106]. DsbA is responsible for introducing disulfide bonds into unfolded or partially folded proteins while BPSL0918 thought to play a role in protein folding and chaperoning.

QUORUM SENSING AND TWO COMPONENT SYSTEMS

QS is a cell density-dependent form of communication between bacteria that uses extracellular signaling molecules known as N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs). Most QS systems consist of two proteins LuxI, an AHL synthase, and LuxR, a transcription regulator that binds AHLs and then activates expression of target genes. This process leads to coordinated gene expression in entire populations. The B. pseudomallei genome contains three luxI homologs and five luxR homologs [107]. Six of the eight genes were inactivated by mutagenesis resulting in a delayed time to death in Syrian hamsters and reduced colonization in BALB/c mice [107]. This was corroborated by a luxI1 (BPSS0885) mutant in a Swiss mouse model [75]; however a mutant with all three luxI genes deleted showed no difference in bacterial clearance in an intranasal BALB/c mouse model [108]. Interestingly, the triple luxI mutant also displayed a markedly increased formation rate of MNGCs resulting from the fusion of RAW 264.7 murine macrophages [108]. LuxI1 and LuxR1 (BPSS0887) have also been linked to regulation of siderophore synthesis, secretion of phospholipase C, and the MprA protease [75,109].

TCSs sense and respond to environmental stimuli and are commonly involved in the regulation of bacterial virulence gene expression. At present, three B. pseudomallei TCSs (IrlRS, VirAG and BPSL0127-0128) have been shown to influence interactions with host cells or to be required for virulence in animals. Jones et al identified the IrlRS (BPSS1039-1040) TCS via transposon mutagenesis and demonstrated that this locus was required for efficient invasion of A549, CHO, and HeLa epithelial cells [110]. Interestingly, an irlRS mutant retained wild type virulence in both Syrian hamsters and infant diabetic rats. No differences were observed in uptake by macrophages suggesting that these genes may specifically modulate invasion of nonphagocytic cells. The VirAG TCS was initially identified in B. mallei as a major virulence factor and shown to be a positive regulator of T6SS-1, bimBCADE and tssM [12,111]. Consistent with these findings, Chen et al showed that B. pseudomallei virAG mutants exhibited attenuated survival in RAW 264.7 cells and were avirulent in mice [64]. The BPSL0127-0128 TCS was identified using the phagocytic amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum as a model system. Mutation of the sensor kinase (BPSL0127) in B. pseudomallei resulted in decreased resistance to D. discoideum predation, reduced survival in RAW 264.7 cells, and was avirulent in BALB/c mice [112]. The specific genes controlled by BPSL0127-0128 remain to be determined.

ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE

In addition to having a complex intracellular lifestyle and producing numerous secreted products that influence virulence, B. pseudomallei is resistant to the killing action of cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAPs) including human neutrophil peptides (defensins), protamine sulfate, poly-l-lysine, magainins, and polymyxins [113,114]. Investigations aimed at determining the molecular basis for this resistance have revealed that the expression of smooth LPS and maintenance of outer membrane permeability are critical for conferring high level resistance of B. pseudomallei to CAPs. Mutations that disrupted LPS core biosynthesis and lipid A modifications, or compromised outer membrane integrity resulted in increased susceptibility of B. pseudomallei to CAPs and other antibiotics [113]. More recent studies, however, indicate that B. pseudomallei is highly susceptible to human cathelicidin peptide LL-37 and lactoferrin antimicrobial peptide derivatives, and that these may be useful in the development of novel therapeutic agents for treatment of melioidosis [115-117].

B. pseudomallei is also intrinsically resistant to numerous commonly used antibiotics, including aminoglycosides, penicillins, rifamycins, and third-generation cephalosporins [6]. Thus, the treatment options for melioidosis are limited with intravenous ceftazidime, imipenem or meropenem followed by oral trimethorpim-sulfamethoxazole or amoxicillin-clavulanate reported as effective treatments for acute disease [1,5]. While primary resistance to ceftazidime in clinical isolates is relatively rare, it has been reported. In patients with multiple isolates collected over hospitalization stays, mutation of penA (BPSS0946), a Class A β-lactamase, is common and associated with increased resistance to ceftazidime and clavulanic acid in as little as 17 days [118-121]. Notably, a point mutation leading to a C69Y transition in penA can increase ceftazidime resistance >170 fold [118-120]. Additionally, B. pseudomallei has been reported to undergo genome reduction during chronic infection leading to the deletion of drug targets such as penicillin-binding proteins [122,123]. Understanding the molecular basis for antimicrobial resistance mechanisms in B. pseudomallei should allow the rapid detection of resistant strains and help to facilitate the use of appropriate melioidosis therapies.

EXPERT COMMENTARY & FIVE YEAR VIEW

Melioidosis is an emerging infectious disease in many parts of the world and is a significant public health concern in endemic regions. In addition, B. pseudomallei is recognized as a biothreat agent with the potential for malicious use. Because of this, research into the biology and pathogenesis of this organism has steadily increased over the past decade. It is anticipated that this will continue over the next 5 years and that the knowledge gained from present and ongoing studies can be exploited to identify novel therapeutic targets and antigens for use in future diagnostics and vaccines.

Although B. pseudomallei virulence is multifactorial, it has become apparent that surface polysaccharides (CPS and LPS) and specialized secretion systems (T3SS-3 and T6SS-1) are key factors that contribute to ability of this pathogen to cause disease. Not only do CPS and LPS enable the organism to subvert innate host immune defenses following initial infection, both have been shown to be protective antigens and promising diagnostic candidates. T3SS-3 and T6SS-1 are attractive as anti-bacterial targets and preliminary studies indicate that components of these systems (e.g. BopA and Hcp1) demonstrate promise as future melioidosis vaccine candidates. Additional antigens including adhesins and autotransporter proteins may also be useful in this regard.

B. pseudomallei is a versatile pathogen with a complex intracellular lifestyle that is only beginning to be appreciated at the molecular level. Mechanistic studies focused on understanding the functions of B. pseudomallei virulence determinants will not only shed light on their roles in the pathogenesis of melioidosis, but may also provide insights for the development of novel treatment strategies and countermeasures. Many interesting questions relating to multiple aspects of B. pseudomallei pathogenesis remain to be addressed.

KEY ISSUES.

  • Melioidosis is an emerging infectious disease that can be difficult to treat due to the intrinsic resistance of B. pseudomallei to many commonly used antibiotics.

  • Diagnosis of melioidosis can be challenging and no vaccines are currently available for prevention of B. pseudomallei infections.

  • The complex intracellular lifestyle of B. pseudomallei involves numerous factors and is only beginning to be understood at a molecular level.

  • B. pseudomallei expresses several major virulence determinants that are required for survival of the organism in animal models of melioidosis.

  • Surface polysaccharides (CPS and LPS) are important for evasion of host innate immune defenses, are protective antigens, and represent promising vaccine candidates.

  • Adherence of B. pseudomallei to host cells is multi-factorial and the contribution of various autotransporter proteins in this process is only beginning to be explored.

  • Virulence associated Type III and Type VI secretion systems play major roles in the intracellular behavior of B. pseudomallei. Research aimed at determining how these systems function at a molecular level and how they are regulated will provide important insights into the pathogenesis of melioidosis.

  • The mechanistic details regarding intracellular actin-based motility and B. pseudomallei-induced MNGC formation are poorly understood; the role of MNGCs in disease is unclear.

  • A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying B. pseudomallei pathogenesis may lead to the identification of new therapeutic targets, diagnostic antigens, and vaccine candidates.

REFERENCES

*Of interest:

**Of considerable interest:

  • 1.Wiersinga WJ, Currie BJ, Peacock SJ. Melioidosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012;367(11):1035–1044. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1204699. [A comprehensive review of the clinical aspects of melioidosis.] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Currie BJ, Dance DAB, Cheng AC. The global distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei and melioidosis: an update. Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2008;102(Supplement 1):S1–S4. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(08)70002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cheng AC, Currie BJ. Melioidosis: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Management. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2005;18(2):383–416. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.2.383-416.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Currie BJ, Ward L, Cheng AC. The Epidemiology and Clinical Spectrum of Melioidosis: 540 Cases from the 20 Year Darwin Prospective Study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4(11):e900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lipsitz R, Garges S, Aurigemma R, et al. Workshop on treatment of and postexposure prophylaxis for Burkholderia pseudomallei and B. mallei Infection, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(12):e2. doi: 10.3201/eid1812.120638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schweizer HP. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in Burkholderia pseudomallei: implications for treatment of melioidosis. Future Microbiol. 2012;7(12):1389–1399. doi: 10.2217/fmb.12.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rammaert B, Goyet S, Tarantola A. Melioidosis requires better data sharing for improved diagnosis and management in the Mekong region. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;90(2):383. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0657a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Limmathurotsakul D, Wongratanacheewin S, Teerawattanasook N, et al. Increasing Incidence of Human Melioidosis in Northeast Thailand. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2010;82(6):1113–1117. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.CDC Possession, use, and transfer of select agentsand toxins; biennial review. Final rule. Fed. Regist. 2012;77:61083–61115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Holden MTG, Titball RW, Peacock SJ, et al. Genomic plasticity of the causative agent of melioidosis, Burkholderia pseudomallei. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(39):14240–14245. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403302101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Woodman ME, Worth RG, Wooten RM. Capsule Influences the Deposition of Critical Complement C3 Levels Required for the Killing of Burkholderia pseudomallei via NADPH-Oxidase Induction by Human Neutrophils. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e52276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schell MA, Ulrich RL, Ribot WJ, et al. Type VI secretion is a major virulence determinant in Burkholderia mallei. Molecular Microbiology. 2007;64(6):1466–1485. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05734.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Heiss C, Burtnick MN, Wang Z, Azadi P, Brett PJ. Structural analysis of capsular polysaccharides expressed by Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei. Carbohydr Res. 2012;349:90–94. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2011.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Perry MB, MacLean LL, Schollaardt T, Bryan LE, Ho M. Structural characterization of the lipopolysaccharide O antigens of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Infection and Immunity. 1995;63(9):3348–3352. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.9.3348-3352.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Reckseidler-Zenteno SL, Viteri D-F, Moore R, Wong E, Tuanyok A, Woods DE. Characterization of the type III capsular polysaccharide produced by Burkholderia pseudomallei. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2010;59(12):1403–1414. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.022202-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.DeShazer D, Brett PJ, Woods DE. The type II O-antigenic polysaccharide moiety of Burkholderia pseudomallei lipopolysaccharide is required for serum resistance and virulence. Molecular Microbiology. 1998;30(5):1081–1100. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01139.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sim BM, Chantratita N, Ooi WF, et al. Genomic acquisition of a capsular polysaccharide virulence cluster by non-pathogenic Burkholderia isolates. Genome Biol. 2010;11(8):R89. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Reckseidler-Zenteno SL, DeVinney R, Woods DE. The Capsular Polysaccharide of Burkholderia pseudomallei Contributes to Survival in Serum by Reducing Complement Factor C3b Deposition. Infection and Immunity. 2005;73(2):1106–1115. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.2.1106-1115.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Atkins T, Prior R, Mack K, et al. Characterisation of an acapsular mutant of Burkholderia pseudomallei identified by signature tagged mutagenesis. J Med Microbiol. 2002;51(7):539–547. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-51-7-539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.AuCoin DP, Reed DE, Marlenee NL, et al. Polysaccharide specific monoclonal antibodies provide passive protection against intranasal challenge with Burkholderia pseudomallei. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Scott AE, Burtnick MN, Stokes MG, et al. Burkholderia pseudomallei Capsular Polysaccharide Conjugates Provide Protection against Acute Melioidosis. Infect Immun. 2014;82(8):3206–3213. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01847-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cuccui J, Milne TS, Harmer N, et al. Characterization of the Burkholderia pseudomallei K96243 capsular polysaccharide I coding region. Infect Immun. 2012;80(3):1209–1221. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05805-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sarkar-Tyson M, Thwaite JE, Harding SV, et al. Polysaccharides and virulence of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2007;56(8):1005–1010. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47043-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ooi WF, Ong C, Nandi T, et al. The Condition-Dependent Transcriptional Landscape of Burkholderia pseudomallei. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(9):e1003795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Masoud H, Ho M, Schollaardt T, Perry MB. Characterization of the capsular polysaccharide of Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) pseudomallei 304b. Journal of Bacteriology. 1997;179(18):5663–5669. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.18.5663-5669.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Steinmetz I, Rohde M, Brenneke B. Purification and characterization of an exopolysaccharide of Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) pseudomallei. Infection and Immunity. 1995;63(10):3959–3965. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.10.3959-3965.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tuanyok A, Stone JK, Mayo M, et al. The Genetic and Molecular Basis of O-Antigenic Diversity in Burkholderia pseudomallei Lipopolysaccharide. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(1):e1453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Heiss C, Burtnick MN, Roberts RA, Black I, Azadi P, Brett PJ. Revised structures for the predominant O-polysaccharides expressed by Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei. Carbohydr Res. 2013;381:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2013.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Essex-Lopresti AE, Boddey JA, Thomas R, et al. A Type IV Pilin, PilA, Contributes to Adherence of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Virulence In Vivo. Infection and Immunity. 2005;73(2):1260–1264. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.2.1260-1264.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Boddey JA, Flegg CP, Day CJ, Beacham IR, Peak IR. Temperature-Regulated Microcolony Formation by Burkholderia pseudomallei Requires pilA and Enhances Association with Cultured Human Cells. Infection and Immunity. 2006;74(9):5374–5381. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00569-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nandi T, Ong C, Singh AP, et al. A Genomic Survey of Positive Selection in Burkholderia pseudomallei Provides Insights into the Evolution of Accidental Virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(4):e1000845. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sangdee K, Waropastrakul S, Wongratanacheewin S, Homchampa P. Heterologously type IV pilus expressed protein of Burkholderia pseudomallei is immunogenic but fails to induce protective immunity in mice. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health. 2011;42(5):1190–1196. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lassaux P, Conchillo-Solé O, Manjasetty BA, et al. Redefining the PF06864 Pfam Family Based on Burkholderia pseudomallei PilO2<sub>Bp</sub> S-SAD Crystal Structure. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4):e94981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Morris C, Tam CKP, Wallis TS, Jones PW, Hackett J. Salmonella enterica serovar Dublin strains which are Vi antigen-positive use type IVB pili for bacterial self-association and human intestinal cell entry. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2003;35(6):279–284. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2003.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Balder R, Lipski S, Lazarus J, et al. Identification of Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei adhesins for human respiratory epithelial cells. BMC Microbiology. 2010;10(1):250. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lazar Adler NR, Dean RE, Saint RJ, et al. Identification of a Predicted Trimeric Autotransporter Adhesin Required for Biofilm Formation of Burkholderia pseudomallei. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e79461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Campos CG, Borst L, Cotter PA. Characterization of BcaA, a Putative Classical Autotransporter Protein in Burkholderia pseudomallei. Infection and Immunity. 2013;81(4):1121–1128. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01453-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Campos CG, Byrd MS, Cotter PA. Functional Characterization of Burkholderia pseudomallei Trimeric Autotransporters. Infection and Immunity. 2013;81(8):2788–2799. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00526-13. [Comparison of eight autotransporters for roles in cell adherence and pathogenesis.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lazar Adler NR, Stevens JM, Stevens MP, Galyov EE. Autotransporters and Their Role in the Virulence of Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:151. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lafontaine E, Balder R, Michel F, Hogan R. Characterization of an autotransporter adhesin protein shared by Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei. BMC Microbiology. 2014;14(1):92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cornelis GR. The type III secretion injectisome. Nat Rev Micro. 2006;4(11):811–825. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sun GW, Gan Y-H. Unraveling type III secretion systems in the highly versatile Burkholderia pseudomallei. Trends in Microbiology. 2010;18(12):561–568. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2010.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Stevens MP, Wood MW, Taylor LA, et al. An Inv/Mxi-Spa-like type III protein secretion system in Burkholderia pseudomallei modulates intracellular behaviour of the pathogen. Molecular Microbiology. 2002;46(3):649–659. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03190.x. [The initial description of T3SS-3 in B. pseudomallei examining virulence in vitro and in vivo.] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Stevens MP, Friebel A, Taylor LA, et al. A Burkholderia pseudomallei Type III Secreted Protein, BopE, Facilitates Bacterial Invasion of Epithelial Cells and Exhibits Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Activity. Journal of Bacteriology. 2003;185(16):4992–4996. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.16.4992-4996.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Stevens MP, Haque A, Atkins T, et al. Attenuated virulence and protective efficacy of a Burkholderia pseudomallei bsa type III secretion mutant in murine models of melioidosis. Microbiology. 2004;150(8):2669–2676. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27146-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Warawa J, Woods DE. Type III secretion system cluster 3 is required for maximal virulence of Burkholderia pseudomallei in a hamster infection model. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2005;242(1):101–108. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.10.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Muangsombut V, Suparak S, Pumirat P, et al. Inactivation of Burkholderia pseudomallei bsaQ results in decreased invasion efficiency and delayed escape of bacteria from endocytic vesicles. Archives of Microbiology. 2008;190(6):623–631. doi: 10.1007/s00203-008-0413-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hii C-S, Sun GW, Goh JWK, Lu J, Stevens MP, Gan Y-H. Interleukin-8 Induction by Burkholderia pseudomallei Can Occur without Toll-Like Receptor Signaling but Requires a Functional Type III Secretion System. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2008;197(11):1537–1547. doi: 10.1086/587905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Burtnick MN, Brett PJ, Nair V, Warawa JM, Woods DE, Gherardini FC. Burkholderia pseudomallei Type III Secretion System Mutants Exhibit Delayed Vacuolar Escape Phenotypes in RAW 264.7 Murine Macrophages. Infection and Immunity. 2008;76(7):2991–3000. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00263-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bast A, Krause K, Schmidt IHE, et al. Caspase-1-Dependent and -Independent Cell Death Pathways in Burkholderia pseudomallei Infection of Macrophages. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(3):e1003986. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cullinane M, Gong L, Li X, et al. Stimulation of autophagy suppresses the intracellular survival of Burkholderia pseudomallei in mammalian cell lines. Autophagy. 2008;4(6):744–753. doi: 10.4161/auto.6246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gong L, Cullinane M, Treerat P, et al. The Burkholderia pseudomallei Type III Secretion System and BopA Are Required for Evasion of LC3-Associated Phagocytosis. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(3):e17852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Srinon V, Muangman S, Imyaem N, et al. Comparative assessment of the intracellular survival of the Burkholderia pseudomallei bopC mutant. Journal of Microbiology. 2013;51(4):522–526. doi: 10.1007/s12275-013-2557-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pumirat P, Broek CV, Juntawieng N, et al. Analysis of the Prevalence, Secretion and Function of a Cell Cycle-Inhibiting Factor in the Melioidosis Pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(5):e96298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 55.Cui J, Yao Q, Li S, et al. Glutamine Deamidation and Dysfunction of Ubiquitin/NEDD8 Induced by a Bacterial Effector Family. Science. 2009;329(5996):1215–1218. doi: 10.1126/science.1193844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jubelin G, Chavez CV, Taieb F, et al. Cycle Inhibiting Factors (CIFs) Are a Growing Family of Functional Cyclomodulins Present in Invertebrate and Mammal Bacterial Pathogens. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(3):e4855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yao Q, Cui J, Zhu Y, et al. A bacterial type III effector family uses the papain-like hydrolytic activity to arrest the host cell cycle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106(10):3716–3721. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900212106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Suparak S, Kespichayawattana W, Haque A, et al. Multinucleated Giant Cell Formation and Apoptosis in Infected Host Cells Is Mediated by Burkholderia pseudomallei Type III Secretion Protein BipB. Journal of Bacteriology. 2005;187(18):6556–6560. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.18.6556-6560.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Leiman PG, Basler M, Ramagopal UA, et al. Type VI secretion apparatus and phage tail-associated protein complexes share a common evolutionary origin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106(11):4154–4159. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813360106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Basler M, Pilhofer M, Henderson GP, Jensen GJ, Mekalanos JJ. Type VI secretion requires a dynamic contractile phage tail-like structure. Nature. 2012;483(7388):182–186. doi: 10.1038/nature10846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Burtnick MN, Brett PJ, Harding SV, et al. The Cluster 1 Type VI Secretion System Is a Major Virulence Determinant in Burkholderia pseudomallei. Infection and Immunity. 2011;79(4):1512–1525. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01218-10. [Examination of each T6SS cluster for its role in mammalian pathogenesis.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Shalom G, Shaw JG, Thomas MS. In vivo expression technology identifies a type VI secretion system locus in Burkholderia pseudomallei that is induced upon invasion of macrophages. Microbiology. 2007;153(8):2689–2699. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/006585-0. [The initial description of T6SS-1 in B. pseudomallei examining virulence in macrophages.] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Burtnick MN, Brett PJ. Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia pseudomallei Cluster 1 Type VI Secretion System Gene Expression Is Negatively Regulated by Iron and Zinc. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(10):e76767. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chen Y, Wong J, Sun GW, Liu Y, Tan G-YG, Gan Y-H. Regulation of Type VI Secretion System during Burkholderia pseudomallei Infection. Infection and Immunity. 2011;79(8):3064–3073. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05148-11. [Elucidation of a regulatory cascade governing T3SS-3 and T6SS-1 expression.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pilatz S, Breitbach K, Hein N, et al. Identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei Genes Required for the Intracellular Life Cycle and In Vivo Virulence. Infection and Immunity. 2006;74(6):3576–3586. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01262-05. [Identification of numerous genes involved in the pathogenesis of B. pseudomallei.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hopf V, Göhler A, Eske-Pogodda K, Bast A, Steinmetz I, Breitbach K. BPSS1504, a cluster 1 type VI secretion gene, is involved in intracellular survival and virulence of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Infection and Immunity. 2014 doi: 10.1128/IAI.01544-14. In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Toesca IJ, French CT, Miller JF. The Type VI Secretion System Spike Protein VgrG5 Mediates Membrane Fusion during Intercellular Spread by Pseudomallei Group Burkholderia Species. Infection and Immunity. 2014;82(4):1436–1444. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01367-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Schwarz S, Singh P, Robertson JD, et al. VgrG-5 Is a Burkholderia Type VI Secretion System-Exported Protein Required for Multinucleated Giant Cell Formation and Virulence. Infection and Immunity. 2014;82(4):1445–1452. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01368-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sun GW, Chen Y, Liu Y, et al. Identification of a regulatory cascade controlling Type III Secretion System 3 gene expression in Burkholderia pseudomallei. Molecular Microbiology. 2010;76(3):677–689. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07124.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Burtnick MN, DeShazer D, Nair V, Gherardini FC, Brett PJ. Burkholderia mallei cluster 1 type VI secretion mutants exhibit growth and actin polymerization defects in RAW 264.7 murine macrophages. Infect Immun. 2010;78(1):88–99. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00985-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Tan KS, Chen Y, Lim Y-C, et al. Suppression of Host Innate Immune Response by Burkholderia pseudomallei through the Virulence Factor TssM. The Journal of Immunology. 2010;184(9):5160–5171. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Burtnick MN, Brett PJ, DeShazer D. Proteomic analysis of the Burkholderia pseudomallei type II secretome reveals hydrolytic enzymes, novel proteins, and the deubiquitinase TssM. Infection and Immunity. 2014 doi: 10.1128/IAI.01739-14. In Press. [Identification of novel T2SS secreted products.] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Shanks J, Burtnick MN, Brett PJ, et al. Burkholderia mallei tssM Encodes a Putative Deubiquitinase That Is Secreted and Expressed inside Infected RAW 264.7 Murine Macrophages. Infection and Immunity. 2009;77(4):1636–1648. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01339-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.DeShazer D, Brett PJ, Burtnick MN, Woods DE. Molecular Characterization of Genetic Loci Required for Secretion of Exoproducts in Burkholderia pseudomallei. Journal of Bacteriology. 1999;181(15):4661–4664. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.15.4661-4664.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Valade E, Thibault FM, Gauthier YP, Palencia M, Popoff MY, Vidal DR. The PmlIPmlR Quorum-Sensing System in Burkholderia pseudomallei Plays a Key Role in Virulence and Modulates Production of the MprA Protease. Journal of Bacteriology. 2004;186(8):2288–2294. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.8.2288-2294.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Korbsrisate S, Tomaras AP, Damnin S, et al. Characterization of two distinct phospholipase C enzymes from Burkholderia pseudomallei. Microbiology. 2007;153(6):1907–1915. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2006/003004-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Tuanyok A, Tom M, Dunbar J, Woods DE. Genome-Wide Expression Analysis of Burkholderia pseudomallei Infection in a Hamster Model of Acute Melioidosis. Infection and Immunity. 2006;74(10):5465–5476. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00737-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Singh AP, Lai S-c, Nandi T, et al. Evolutionary Analysis of Burkholderia pseudomallei Identifies Putative Novel Virulence Genes, Including a Microbial Regulator of Host Cell Autophagy. Journal of Bacteriology. 2013;195(24):5487–5498. doi: 10.1128/JB.00718-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Cruz-Migoni A, Hautbergue GM, Artymiuk PJ, et al. A Burkholderia pseudomallei Toxin Inhibits Helicase Activity of Translation Factor eIF4A. Science. 2011;334(6057):821–824. doi: 10.1126/science.1211915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Biggins JB, Kang HS, Ternei MA, DeShazer D, Brady SF. The chemical arsenal of Burkholderia pseudomallei is essential for pathogenicity. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(26):9484–9490. doi: 10.1021/ja504617n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Biggins JB, Ternei MA, Brady SF. Malleilactone, a Polyketide Synthase-Derived Virulence Factor Encoded by the Cryptic Secondary Metabolome of Burkholderia pseudomallei Group Pathogens. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2012;134(32):13192–13195. doi: 10.1021/ja3052156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Allwood EM, Devenish RJ, Prescott M, Adler B, Boyce JD. Strategies for intracellular survival of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2011;22(2):170. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Galyov EE, Brett PJ, DeShazer D. Molecular Insights into Burkholderia pseudomallei and Burkholderia mallei Pathogenesis. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2010;64(1):495–517. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.French CT, Toesca IJ, Wu T-H, et al. Dissection of the Burkholderia intracellular life cycle using a photothermal nanoblade. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(29):12095–12100. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107183108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Sitthidet C, Korbsrisate S, Layton AN, Field TR, Stevens MP, Stevens JM. Identification of Motifs of Burkholderia pseudomallei BimA Required for Intracellular Motility, Actin Binding, and Actin Polymerization. Journal of Bacteriology. 2011;193(8):1901–1910. doi: 10.1128/JB.01455-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Stevens MP, Stevens JM, Jeng RL, et al. Identification of a bacterial factor required for actin-based motility of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Molecular Microbiology. 2005;56(1):40–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04528.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Dowling AJ, Wilkinson PA, Holden MTG, et al. Genome-Wide Analysis Reveals Loci Encoding Anti-Macrophage Factors in the Human Pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei K96243. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(12):e15693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Tuanyok A, Auerbach RK, Brettin TS, et al. A Horizontal Gene Transfer Event Defines Two Distinct Groups within Burkholderia pseudomallei That Have Dissimilar Geographic Distributions. Journal of Bacteriology. 2007;189(24):9044–9049. doi: 10.1128/JB.01264-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Stevens JM, Ulrich RL, Taylor LA, et al. Actin-Binding Proteins from Burkholderia mallei and Burkholderia thailandensis Can Functionally Compensate for the Actin-Based Motility Defect of a Burkholderia pseudomallei bimA Mutant. Journal of Bacteriology. 2005;187(22):7857–7862. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.22.7857-7862.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Sitthidet C, Stevens JM, Chantratita N, et al. Prevalence and Sequence Diversity of a Factor Required for Actin-Based Motility in Natural Populations of Burkholderia Species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2008;46(7):2418–2422. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00368-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Sarovich DS, Price EP, Webb JR, et al. Variable Virulence Factors in Burkholderia pseudomallei (Melioidosis) Associated with Human Disease. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e91682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Utaisincharoen P, Arjcharoen S, Limposuwan K, Tungpradabkul S, Sirisinha S. Burkholderia pseudomallei RpoS regulates multinucleated giant cell formation and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in mouse macrophage cell line (RAW 264.7). Microbial Pathogenesis. 2006;40(4):184–189. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2006.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Boddey JA, Day CJ, Flegg CP, et al. The bacterial gene lfpA influences the potent induction of calcitonin receptor and osteoclast-related genes in Burkholderia pseudomallei-induced TRAP-positive multinucleated giant cells. Cellular Microbiology. 2007;9(2):514–531. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00807.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Vanaporn M, Wand M, Michell SL, et al. Superoxide dismutase C is required for intracellular survival and virulence of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Microbiology. 2011;157(8):2392–2400. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.050823-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Loprasert S, Whangsuk W, Sallabhan R, Mongkolsuk S. DpsA protects the human pathogen Burkholderia pseudomallei against organic hydroperoxide. Arch Microbiol. 2004;182(1):96–101. doi: 10.1007/s00203-004-0694-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Loprasert S, Sallabhan R, Whangsuk W, Mongkolsuk S. Compensatory increase in ahpC gene expression and its role in protecting Burkholderia pseudomallei against reactive nitrogen intermediates. Arch Microbiol. 2003;180(6):498–502. doi: 10.1007/s00203-003-0621-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Loprasert S, Whangsuk W, Sallabhan R, Mongkolsuk S. Regulation of the katG-dpsA operon and the importance of KatG in survival of Burkholderia pseudomallei exposed to oxidative stress. FEBS Lett. 2003;542(1-3):17–21. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00328-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Jangiam W, Loprasert S, Smith DR, Tungpradabkul S. Burkholderia pseudomallei RpoS regulates OxyR and the katG-dpsA operon under conditions of oxidative stress. Microbiol Immunol. 2010;54(7):389–397. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2010.00230.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Pudla M, Limposuwan K, Utaisincharoen P. Burkholderia pseudomallei-induced expression of a negative regulator, sterile-alpha and Armadillo motif-containing protein, in mouse macrophages: a possible mechanism for suppression of the MyD88-independent pathway. Infect Immun. 2011;79(7):2921–2927. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01254-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Utaisincharoen P, Tangthawornchaikul N, Kespichayawattana W, Chaisuriya P, Sirisinha S. Burkholderia pseudomallei interferes with inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) production: a possible mechanism of evading macrophage killing. Microbiol Immunol. 2001;45(4):307–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2001.tb02623.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Baral P, Utaisincharoen P. Involvement of signal regulatory protein alpha, a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor signaling, in impairing the MyD88-independent pathway and intracellular killing of Burkholderia pseudomallei-infected mouse macrophages. Infect Immun. 2012;80(12):4223–4231. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00718-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Baral P, Utaisincharoen P. Sterile-alpha- and armadillo motif-containing protein inhibits the TRIF-dependent downregulation of signal regulatory protein alpha to interfere with intracellular bacterial elimination in Burkholderia pseudomallei-infected mouse macrophages. Infect Immun. 2013;81(9):3463–3471. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00519-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Ireland PM, Marshall L, Norville I, Sarkar-Tyson M. The serine protease inhibitor Ecotin is required for full virulence of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Microbial Pathogenesis, 67. 2014;68(0):55–58. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2014.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Norville IH, Harmer NJ, Harding SV, et al. A Burkholderia pseudomallei Macrophage Infectivity Potentiator-Like Protein Has Rapamycin-Inhibitable Peptidylprolyl Isomerase Activity and Pleiotropic Effects on Virulence. Infection and Immunity. 2011;79(11):4299–4307. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00134-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Ireland PM, McMahon RM, Marshall LE, et al. Disarming Burkholderia pseudomallei: Structural and Functional Characterization of a Disulfide Oxidoreductase (DsbA) Required for Virulence In Vivo. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling. 2014;20(4):606–617. doi: 10.1089/ars.2013.5375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Norville IH, Breitbach K, Eske-Pogodda K, et al. A novel FK-506-binding-like protein that lacks peptidyl-prolyl isomerase activity is involved in intracellular infection and in vivo virulence of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Microbiology. 2011;157(9):2629–2638. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.049163-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Ulrich RL, DeShazer D, Brueggemann EE, Hines HB, Oyston PC, Jeddeloh JA. Role of quorum sensing in the pathogenicity of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2004;53(11):1053–1064. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.45661-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Horton RE, Grant GD, Matthews B, et al. Quorum Sensing Negatively Regulates Multinucleate Cell Formation during Intracellular Growth of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Macrophage-Like Cells. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e63394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Song Y, Xie C, Ong Y-M, Gan Y-H, Chua K-L. The BpsIR Quorum-Sensing System of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Journal of Bacteriology. 2005;187(2):785–790. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.2.785-790.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Jones AL, DeShazer D, Woods DE. Identification and characterization of a two-component regulatory system involved in invasion of eukaryotic cells and heavy-metal resistance in Burkholderia pseudomallei. Infection and Immunity. 1997;65(12):4972–4977. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.12.4972-4977.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Nierman WC, DeShazer D, Kim HS, et al. Structural flexibility in the Burkholderia mallei genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(39):14246–14251. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403306101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Hasselbring BM, Patel MK, Schell MA. Dictyostelium discoideum as a Model System for Identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei Virulence Factors. Infection and Immunity. 2011;79(5):2079–2088. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01233-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Burtnick MN, Woods DE. Isolation of polymyxin B-susceptible mutants of Burkholderia pseudomallei and molecular characterization of genetic loci involved in polymyxin B resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999;43(11):2648–2656. doi: 10.1128/aac.43.11.2648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Jones AL, Beveridge TJ, Woods DE. Intracellular survival of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Infect Immun. 1996;64(3):782–790. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.3.782-790.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Puknun A, Bolscher JG, Nazmi K, et al. A heterodimer comprised of two bovine lactoferrin antimicrobial peptides exhibits powerful bactericidal activity against Burkholderia pseudomallei. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;29(7):1217–1224. doi: 10.1007/s11274-013-1284-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Kanthawong S, Bolscher JG, Veerman EC, et al. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of LL-37 and its truncated variants against Burkholderia pseudomallei. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;39(1):39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kanthawong S, Nazmi K, Wongratanacheewin S, Bolscher JG, Wuthiekanun V, Taweechaisupapong S. In vitro susceptibility of Burkholderia pseudomallei to antimicrobial peptides. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34(4):309–314. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Sarovich DS, Price EP, Von Schulze AT, et al. Characterization of Ceftazidime Resistance Mechanisms in Clinical Isolates of Burkholderia pseudomallei from Australia. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2):e30789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Rholl DA, Papp-Wallace KM, Tomaras AP, Vasil ML, Bonomo RA, Schweizer HP. Molecular Investigations of PenA-mediated beta-lactam Resistance in Burkholderia pseudomallei. Front Microbiol. 2011;2:139. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Sam I-C, See KH, Puthucheary SD. Variations in Ceftazidime and Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Susceptibilities within a Clonal Infection of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2009;47(5):1556–1558. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01657-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Tribuddharat C, Moore RA, Baker P, Woods DE. Burkholderia pseudomallei Class A β-Lactamase Mutations That Confer Selective Resistance against Ceftazidime or Clavulanic Acid Inhibition. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2003;47(7):2082–2087. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.7.2082-2087.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Chantratita N, Rholl DA, Sim B, et al. Antimicrobial resistance to ceftazidime involving loss of penicillin-binding protein 3 in Burkholderia pseudomallei. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(41):17165–17170. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111020108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Hayden HS, Lim R, Brittnacher MJ, et al. Evolution of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Recurrent Melioidosis. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5):e36507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES