Skip to main content
Journal of International Oral Health : JIOH logoLink to Journal of International Oral Health : JIOH
. 2015 Apr;7(4):54–57.

Antimicrobial Activity of Filling Materials Used in Primary Teeth Pulpotomy

Hévelin Couto Pimenta 1, Álvaro Henrique Borges 2,, Matheus Coelho Bandeca 4, Ana Thereza Sabóia Neves 1, Rodrigo Gusmão Fontes 3, Priscila Vieira da Silva 3, Andreza Maria Fábio Aranha 2
PMCID: PMC4409797  PMID: 25954072

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the antibacterial activity of pulp capping materials used in primary teeth (formocresol [FC], zinc oxide and eugenol cement [ZOE], ZOE mixed with FC [ZOEFC], mineral trioxide aggregate [MTA] and calcium hydroxide [CH]) against cariogenic bacteria. The agar plate diffusion test was used for the cultures, including saline solution as a negative control. A base layer of 15 mL of brain heart infusion agar was inoculated with 300 mL of each inoculum. Twelve wells were made and completely filled with one of the testing materials for each bacteria strain. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Zones of microbial inhibition and material diffusion were measured and photographed. The results obtained were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney non-parametric tests. Respectively, the medium zones of bacteria inhibition of FC, ZOE, ZOEFC, MTA and CH against Streptococcus mutans growth were 28.5, 15.2, 20.8, 9.3 and 11.6; against Lactobacillus acidophilus growth were 28.7, 14.8, 15.3, 15.2 and 20.0, and against Actinomyces viscosus growth were 13.6, 13.5, 14.7, 10.0 and 13.6. We might confirmed the high antibacterial activity of FC solution, especially against S. mutans and L. acidophilus, as wells as, the low inhibitory effect of MTA cement on the cariogenic bacteria studied.

Keywords: Anti-infective agents, deciduous, pulpotomy

Introduction

One of the major purposes of pediatric dentistry is to maintain primary teeth in anatomical and functional conditions up to their physiological exfoliation and eruption of permanent teeth. It is fundamental to prevent changes in chewing, speech and phonetics, as well as for maintenance of the dental arch length and esthetics, and prevention of deleterious oral habits.1

The early childhood caries as in dental traumas may involve pulp tissue, exposing it to oral microflora.2 In the absence of endodontic treatment and bacterial control, inflammatory mediators are released and can compromise the vitality of dental pulp, leading the tissue to dystrophic calcification or to necrosis.3,4

Currently, there are different techniques and protocols for the treatment of the pulp of primary teeth, depending on the damage extension and the pathologic pulp involvement.5 Pulpotomy is a conservative therapeutic alternative responsible for the removal of the infected coronal pulp and capping of the remaining non-infected pulp tissue with biocompatible material.4,5 The ideal pulp capping cement should have good physical and biological properties such as sealing of the remaining pulp tissue, not being resorbable, being biocompatible and presenting antibacterial activity.3 An antibacterial pulp capping cement is necessary to avoid failures in the conservative endodontic treatment and the dissemination of the inflammatory and infectious processes along the radicular channel.3

Among the materials used for primary teeth pulpotomies stand out the calcium hydroxide (CH) cement.3,6 and formocresol (FC).7-10 The CH cement has the ability to stimulate the tertiary dentin formation, it is biocompatible and presents high alkaline pH, which confers it antimicrobial property.3,6,11 However, when not correctly indicated, it may stimulate internal dentinal resorption.12 FC is a medication derived from formaldehyde, widely accepted as the treatment of choice for primary teeth,7 characterized by the clinical action of tissue fixation, but it does not lead to tissue repair.10 Although there are evidences of clinical success and radiographic success,8 there is controversy about FC toxicity and carcinogenic potential,7,13 which explain its decreasing use in recent years.9 In this regard, techniques and more biocompatible alternative materials have been proposed, including laser therapy, lyophilized bone, bone morphogenetic protein and aggregate of mineral trioxide.14

The MTA has attracted the attention of endodontics as a result of its sealing capacity, biocompatibility, ability to stimulate hard tissue deposition and periodontal ligament regeneration, and cell inductive potential.14,15 MTA is composed mainly of calcium phosphate and calcium oxide, with an initial pH of 10.2 and during its setting reaches a pH of 12.5, comparable to CH.3

In addition, there is evidence that MTA presents antimicrobial properties similar to zinc oxide and eugenol cement (ZOE) and low cytotoxic effect.16 Clinically and radiographically, MTA has been showed a 100 % success rates after 6, 12 and 24 months treatment.12,17

As the microorganisms eradication is essential for successful endodontic treatment, characterized by the maintenance of the vitality of the remaining radicular pulp, the evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of filling materials used in pulpotomy of primary teeth is critical to the success of the technique.

Materials and Methods

The materials evaluated in this study were FC (FC; Biodynamic Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Ltda., Ibiporã, PR, Brazil), ZOE (ZOE; IRM, Dentsply, Petrópolis, PR, Brazil), FC mixed with ZOE (FCZOE), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA; Ângelus, Londrina, PR, Brazil), CH paste (CH p.a and physiological solution) (HC; Biodynamic Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Ltda., Ibiporã, PR, Brazil). The antimicrobial activity of each paste was evaluated against Streptococcus mutans (ATCC # 25175), Lactobacillus acidophilus (ATCC# IAL-523) and Actinomyces viscosus (T14V # IAL.5) by the Agar diffusion test. Indicators strains were grown in Brain Heart Infusion Agar (BHI - Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) at 37°C for 24 h, according to the physiological characteristics of each microorganism.

In each sterilized petri plates (20 mm × 100 mm), a base layer containing 15 mL of BHI agar mixed with 300 mL of each inoculum was prepared. After solidification of culture medium, six wells measuring 4 mm in diameter, about 15 mm from the edges of the dishes and at equidistant points, were made in each plate and completely filled with one of the testing materials. For the FC group, 5 mL of FC were applied on sterile filter paper discs (N = 12). Twelve wells were filled with each material and bacterial strain. All materials were prepared under aseptic conditions according to the recommendations of their respective manufacturers. 5 mL of 0.9% saline solution was applied on a 4 mm diameter sterile filter paper discs (N =3), as negative control group. The plates were kept for 2 h at room temperature for diffusion of the material. After that, they were incubated at 37°C for 48 h.

Zones of bacterial inhibition and material diffusion were photographed and measured in millimeters (mm), using a digital caliper (Mitutoyo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). Measurements were taken at the greatest distance between two points at the outer limit of the inhibition halo formed around the well. Antibacterial tests were repeated three times to confirm the homogeneity of the results. Results were expressed as means and subjected to statistical non-parametric tests of Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney (Wilcoxon rank-sum-tests) at the significance level of 5%.

Results

The mean values and standard deviations of the inhibition zones for each material according to the bacteria strain are shown in Table 1. Antibacterial activity was only considered to have occurred when a true inhibition zone was present, whether associated or not with the diffusion zone.

Table 1.

Means of inhibition zones diameters (mm) and SD values observed on inoculated agar plates after 48 h according to experimental material and bacteria strain.

graphic file with name JIOH-7-54-g001.jpg

It can be observed that all studied material showed antibacterial activity, and they were statistically different from the negative control against bacteria studied strains. FC was the most effective material against all tested bacteria strains. When associated to the FC, the ZOE increased their activity against S. mutans. MTA showed the lowest activity against S. mutans and A. viscosus.

Only the CH paste showed diffusion zones between 3.8 and 5.7 mm for all bacteria strains.

Discussion

In this study, the antimicrobial activity of FC, CH paste, ZOE associated or not with FC, and MTA cement were investigated. FC and CH paste have been used worldwide as pulp capping materials in primary teeth pulpotomy10,18-20 and more recently, MTA, due to showing good clinical and radiographic results and being biocompatible.12,14,17

The microorganisms studied in this study are Gram-positive aerobic bacteria strains, which are part of the aciduric phase of the dental caries progression.21 Dental caries is resulted by imbalance of the de-/remineralization process where strains of S. mutans and Lactobacillus as well as aciduric strains of non-mutans Streptococcus, Actinomyces, bifidobacteria (anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria) and fungi may be dominant.21 Around 30-50% of the microorganisms present in the caries lesions are represented by S. mutans, but including L. acidophilus and A. viscosus presence.22

Different in vitro methods have been used to study antibacterial activity of dental materials.23,24 Although differences in the agar medium, capacity of diffusion of the materials, bacterial strains, and cell density may interfere in the formation of inhibition zones around the materials studied,11 the agar plate diffusion test was selected in this study to be the method of antimicrobial activity widely used.23,25,26

According to the results of the present study, FC was the most effective medication against S. mutans and L. acidophilus, having high activity against A. viscosus as well. FC has been considered the gold standard in pediatric dentistry due to excellent clinical and radiographic results in pulpotomy of primary molars.10,18 CH paste presented best effect against L. acidophilus followed by A. viscosus. It could be explained by its high alkalinity, reaching a pH of 12.5 after setting,27 and the fact that both bacteria strains are highly acidogenic and aciduric, and may survive in an environment at pH less than 4.6.28 However, the action mechanism of CH to bacteria is not yet totally clarified.29

MTA presented less antimicrobial activity against A. viscosus and notably against S. mutans than the other materials. The MTA setting process is based on the reactions of anhydrous cement compounds with water (hydration reaction), producing a calcium silicate hydrate of low alkalinity, which dissociates in CH molecules.30 Thus, MTA, after setting, may be considered as CH surrounded by a silicate matrix.30 Although presented inferior results in vitro test, MTA has shown clinical and radiographic results compatible to FC,10,12,17,18 and higher than CH.12,19 In addition, MTA presents other ideal properties as its high sealing ability, biocompatibility, capacity to stimulate dentin neoformation and regeneration of periodontal tissue.12,17

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated that all tested materials indicated for pulpotomy of primary teeth have antibacterial potential, according to bacteria strain. More evidences on the mechanisms of action of released components by materials, pH, as well as on the strains metabolism, are necessary to explain the results obtained. Another important issue to be investigated is whether the antimicrobial activity is sufficient to control bacterial metabolism or eliminate these microorganisms.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: None

Source of Support: Nil

References

  • 1.Smith NL, Seale NS, Nunn ME. Ferric sulfate pulpotomy in primary molars: A retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22(3):192–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sae-Lim V, Yuen KW. An evaluation of after-office-hour dental trauma in Singapore. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1997;13(4):164–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1997.tb00032.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schmitt D, Lee J, Bogen G. Multifaceted use of ProRoot MTA root canal repair material. Pediatr Dent. 2001;23(4):326–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Simancas-Pallares MA, Díaz-Caballero AJ, Luna-Ricardo LM. Mineral trioxide aggregate in primary teeth pulpotomy. A systematic literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010;15(6):e942–6. doi: 10.4317/medoral.15.e942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nadin G, Goel BR, Yeung CA, Glenny AM. Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;1:CD003220. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Katsamakis S, Slot DE, Van der Sluis LW, Van der Weijden F. Histological responses of the periodontium to MTA: A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40(4):334–44. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Primosch RE, Glomb TA, Jerrell RG. Primary tooth pulp therapy as taught in predoctoral pediatric dental programs in the United States. Pediatr Dent. 1997;19(2):118–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Waterhouse PJ, Nunn JH, Whitworth JM. An investigation of the relative efficacy of Buckley's Formocresol and calcium hydroxide in primary molar vital pulp therapy. Br Dent J. 2000;188(1):32–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4800380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Casas MJ, Kenny DJ, Judd PL, Johnston DH. Do we still need formocresol in pediatric dentistry? J Can Dent Assoc. 2005;71(10):749–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Srinivasan D, Jayanthi M. Comparative evaluation of formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate as pulpotomy agents in deciduous teeth. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22(3):385–90. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.87058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Estrela C, Bammann LL, Estrela CR, Silva RS, Pécora JD. Antimicrobial and chemical study of MTA, Portland cement, calcium hydroxide paste, Sealapex and Dycal. Braz Dent J. 2000;11(1):3–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Oliveira TM, Moretti AB, Sakai VT, Lourenço Neto N, Santos CF, Machado MA, et al. Clinical, radiographic and histologic analysis of the effects of pulp capping materials used in pulpotomies of human primary teeth. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2013;14(2):65–71. doi: 10.1007/s40368-013-0015-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Milnes AR. Persuasive evidence that formocresol use in pediatric dentistry is safe. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006;72(3):247–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Holan G, Eidelman E, Fuks AB. Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27(2):129–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Güven EP, Tasli PN, Yalvac ME, Sofiev N, Kayahan MB, Sahin F. In vitro comparison of induction capacity and biomineralization ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and a bioceramic root canal sealer. Int Endod J. 2013;46(12):1173–82. doi: 10.1111/iej.12115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Torabinejad M, Hong CU, Lee SJ, Monsef M, Pitt Ford TR. Investigation of mineral trioxide aggregate for root-end filling in dogs. J Endod. 1995;21(12):603–8. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81112-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sakai VT, Moretti AB, Oliveira TM, Fornetti AP, Santos CF, Machado MA, et al. Pulpotomy of human primary molars with MTA and Portland cement: A randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J. 2009;207(3):E5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Noorollahian H. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulp medicaments for pulpotomies in primary molars. Br Dent J. 2008;204(11):E20. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Moretti AB, Oliveira TM, Sakai VT, Santos CF, Machado MA, Abdo RC. Mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy of a primary second molar in a patient with agenesis of the permanent successor. Int Endod J. 2007;40(9):738–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01274.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yengopal V, Harneker SY, Patel N, Siegfried N. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2:CD004483. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004483.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Takahashi N, Nyvad B. The role of bacteria in the caries process: Ecological perspectives. J Dent Res. 2011;90(3):294–303. doi: 10.1177/0022034510379602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Marchant S, Brailsford SR, Twomey AC, Roberts GJ, Beighton D. The predominant microflora of nursing caries lesions. Caries Res. 2001;35(6):397–406. doi: 10.1159/000047482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gomes BP, Vianna ME, Sena NT, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, de Souza Filho FJ. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide combined with chlorhexidine gel used as intracanal medicament. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;102(4):544–50. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N, Gogulnath D, Kindo AJ. Dentinal tubule disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine gel, propolis, morinda citrifolia juice, 2% povidone iodine, and calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J. 2010;43(5):419–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01696.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ballal V, Kundabala M, Acharya S, Ballal M. Antimicrobial action of calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine and their combination on endodontic pathogens. Aust Dent J. 2007;52(2):118–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.tb00475.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Poggio C, Colombo M, Scribante A, Sforza D, Bianchi S. In vitro antibacterial activity of different endodontic irrigants. Dent Traumatol. 2012;28(3):205–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Milosevic A. Calcium hydroxide in restorative dentistry. J Dent. 1991;19(1):3–13. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(91)90028-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bradshaw DJ, Marsh PD. Analysis of pH-driven disruption of oral microbial communities in vitro. Caries Res. 1998;32(6):456–62. doi: 10.1159/000016487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vianna ME, Gomes BP, Sena NT, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, de Souza Filho FJ. In vitro evaluation of the susceptibility of endodontic pathogens to calcium hydroxide combined with different vehicles. Braz Dent J. 2005;16(3):175–80. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402005000300001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Holland R, de Souza V, Nery MJ, Bernabé oF, Filho JA, Junior ED, et al. Calcium salts deposition in rat connective tissue after the implantation of calcium hydroxide-containing sealers. J Endod. 2002;28(3):173–6. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200203000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of International Oral Health : JIOH are provided here courtesy of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry

RESOURCES