Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Nat Prod. 2015 Feb 4;78(3):431–440. doi: 10.1021/np5008153

Neolignans and Other Metabolites from Ocotea cymosa from the Madagascar Rain Forest and their Biological Activities, 1

L Harinantenaina Rakotondraibe †,, Paul R Graupner , Quanbo Xiong , Monica Olson , Jessica D Wiley §, Priscilla Krai §, Peggy J Brodie , Martin W Callmander ⊥,°, Etienne Rakotobe ||, Fidy Ratovoson , Vincent E Rasamison ||, Maria B Cassera §, Donald R Hahn , David G I Kingston †,*, Serge Fotso ‡,*
PMCID: PMC4410025  NIHMSID: NIHMS679309  PMID: 25650896

Abstract

Ten new neolignans including the 2′-oxo-8.1′-lignans cymosalignans A (1a), B (2), and C (3), an 8.O.6′-neolignan (4a), ococymosin (5a), didymochlaenone C (6a) and the bicyclo[3.2.1]octanoids 710 were isolated along with the known compounds 3,4,5,3′,5′-pentamethoxy-1′-allyl-8.O.4′-neolignan, 3,4,5,3′-tetramethoxy-1′-allyl-8.O.4′-neolignan, didymochlaenone B, virologin B, ocobullenone and the unusual 2′-oxo-8.1′ –lignan sibyllenone from the stems or bark of the Madagascan plant Ocotea cymosa (Lauraceae). The new 8.O.6′-neolignan 4a, dihydrobenzofuranoid 5a, and the bicyclo[3.2.1]octanoid 7a had weak in vitro activity against Aedes aegypti, while the new compounds 5a, 7a, 8 and 10a and the known virolongin B (4b) and ocobullenone (10b) had antiplasmodial activity. We report herein the structure elucidation of the new compounds on the basis of spectroscopic evidence, including 1- and 2-D NMR spectra, Electronic Circular Dichroism (ECD), and mass spectrometry, and the biological activities of the new and known compounds.


Ocotea (Lauraceae) is a large genus containing about 350 species distributed primarily in the tropical and warm areas of the Americas, with a few in Macronesia, seven in tropical African countries, and 34 in Madagascar.2,3 Ocotea cymosa (Nees) Palacky (vernacular name: varongy) is an endemic medium sized tree up to 25 m tall widely found throughout the eastern part of Madagascar. Its wood and the wood of other Ocotea species growing on the island have been used for furniture, boat building, and making mortars.4 The leaves, bark, and fruits are aromatic and are used as a condiment or added to locally prepared alcoholic drinks. No medicinal uses of O. cymosa have been recorded in Madagascar’s pharmacopoeia, although O. bullata, a species native to eastern and southern South Africa, has been used to treat headache and male urinary tract infections. Plant species from the genus Ocotea are rich sources of neolignans including the bicyclo[3.2.1]octanoid neolignans ocobullenone (10b),5 iso-ocobullenone,6 sibyllenone (7b),7 ocophyllals A and B,8 and virolongin-type9 and benzofuran neolignans.10 Various biological activities such as insecticidal, antibacterial, antitumor, and antiviral have been reported for the lignans.11 Aporphine alkaloids1215 and flavonoids16 have also been isolated from plants of this genus.

The search for bioactive compounds and chemical constituents from natural sources with agricultural value has been an ongoing project in the Dow AgroSciences group. An extract of O. cymosa stems was selected for investigation for its bioactivity as an insecticidal and antifungal agent in the Dow AgroSciences screens.

The eradication of malaria still remains one of the world’s most important medical goals. In 2010, over three billion people were at risk of malaria. Ninety percent of all malaria-related deaths occurred in sub-Saharan Africa, mainly among children under five years of age.17 Recently, the Virginia Tech group reported the isolation and structure elucidation of the two phloroglucinols, mallotojaponins C and D, with potent activity against both blood stage malaria and against gametocytes.18 In continuation of this search for antimalarial compounds from Madagascan plants, an extract of O. cymosa bark was selected for investigation based on its activity against drug resistant Plasmodium falciparum (Dd2).19

Bioguided isolation of ethanol extracts of O. cymosa using both antimalarial and insecticidal screens led to the isolation of 10 new metabolites and six known compounds.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Isolation and Structure Elucidation

Normal phase chromatography followed by HPLC of the crude ethanol extract of O. cymosa stems yielded compounds 14a, 6a, 7a, and 8 – 10a. Similar treatment or direct HPLC of the active antiplasmodial hexanes fraction (IC50 1.25 μg/mL) obtained from a liquid-liquid partitioning of the ethanol extract of O. cymosa bark yielded the new compounds 5a, 7a, 8, 10a and the known virolongin B (4b) ocobullenone (10b)5 as the active antimalarial compounds. The known compounds 3,4,3′,5′-tetramethoxy-8.O.4′-neolignan,20 2,3,4,3′,5′-penta- methoxy-8.O.4′-neolignan,21 didymochlaenone B,22 virolongin B,21 and the 2′-oxo-8.1′-lignan sibyllenone7 were also isolated.

Compound 1a was isolated as an oil. It had the molecular formula C22H26O6 based on its 13C NMR and HREISMS data, indicating 10 indices of hydrogen deficiency. Its 1H NMR spectrum in CDCl3 (Table 1) indicated signals of a substituted propyl group including a methyl doublet at δH 0.67 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, H-9) bonded to the only aliphatic methine in the molecule at δH 2.25 (m) and a methylene unit at δH 2.09 (brt, J = 13.0, H-7b) and 2.99 (dd, J = 13.0, 3.0 Hz, H-7a) which coupled with the C-8 methine. This portion of the molecule was confirmed by a COSY experiment. Furthermore, a 2-propenyl group was identified by vinyl resonances at δH 5.58 (ddt, J = 17.3, 10.1, 7.4 Hz, H-8′), 5.06 (dq, J = 17.3, 1.1 Hz, H-9′a), 4.98 (ddt, J = 10.1, 2.0, 1.1 Hz, H-9′b) and aliphatic resonances at δH 2.73 (ddt, J = 13.2, 7.4, 1.1 Hz, H-7′a), and 2.50 (ddt, J = 13.2, 7.4, 1.1 Hz, H-7′b). Signals attributed to a methylenedioxy group at δH 5.84 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 2H), and two sp2 methines at δH 5.65 (s, H-5′) and δH 5.51 (s, H-2′) were also visible. Two singlet resonances of three methoxy groups at δH 3.83 (s, 6H) and 3.82 (s, 3H) were observed.

Table 1.

1H NMR Data for Compounds 1a–6a (600 MHz, CDCl3)

Position 1a 2 3 4a 5aa 6a
2 6.35 s 6.66 d (2.0) 6.35 s 6.44 s 6.62 s 3.13 m
3a 2.86 dd (13.3, 5.0)
3b 1.89 dd (13.3, 13.3)
5 6.77 d (8.0)
6 6.35 s 6.68 dd (8.0, 2.0) 6.35 s 6.44 s 6.62 s 5.53 s
7 5.08 d (8.4)
7a 2.99 dd (13.0, 3.0) 2.99 dd (13.1, 2.9) 2.99 brd (13.0) 2.99 dd (13.7, 6.4) 2.69 m
7b 2.09 brt (13.0 ) 2.09 brt (13.1) 2.06 t (12.4) 2.77 dd (13.7, 6.4) 2.34 m
8 2.25 m 2.23 m 2.23 m 4.39 sextet (6.2) 3.49 m 5.74 m
9 0.67 d (6.6) 0.65 d (6.6) 0.65 d (6.6) 1.27 d (6.2) 1.48 d (6.8) 5.06 m
2′ 5.51 s 5.52 s 6.63 s
3′ 5.65 s 6.40 s
5′ 5.65 s 5.65 s 6.47 s 6.40 s
6′ 5.51 s 6.52 br s
7′a 2.73 ddt (13.2, 7.4, 1.1) 2.73 dd (13.1, 7.3) 2.74 dd (13.0, 7.2) 3.27 dt (6.6, 1.5) 3.33 ddt (15.5, 6.7, 1.5) 3.36 br dt (6.8, 1.4)
7′b 2.50 ddt (13.2, 7.4, 1.1) 2.51 dd (13.1, 7.3) 2.50 dd (13.0, 7.2) 3.27 dt (6.6, 1.5) 3.28 ddt (15.5, 6.7, 1.5)
8′ 5.58 ddt (17.3, 10.1, 7.4) 5.57 m 5.58 m 5.89 m 5.97 ddt (16.7, 10.1, 6.7) 5.97 m
9′a 5.06 dq (17.3, 1.1) 5.05 brd (17.0) 5.05 brd (17.0) 5.01 m 5.04 dq (10.1, 1.5) 5.13 m
9′b 4.98 ddt (10.1, 2.0, 1.1) 4.98 brd (10.2) 4.98 d (10.1) 5.01 m 5.09 dq (16.7, 1.5) 5.13 m
2′,6′-OCH3 3.79 s
3-OCH3 3.83 s 3.87 s 3.87 s 3.83 s 3.86 s
4-OCH3 3.82 s 3.85 s 3.82 s 3.84 s
5-OCH3 3.83 s 3.87 s 3.83 s 3.86 s
4-OH 5.37 s
3′-OCH3
5′-OCH3
O-CH2-O 5.84 d (1.5) 5.84 s 5.84 s 5.88 d (1.5) 5.87 d (1.5) 5.62 s; 5.48 s
O-CH2-O 5.87 d (1.5) 5.91 d (1.5)
a

Spectrum obtained at 500 MHz

The 13C NMR spectrum of 1a (Table 2) displayed only 19 signals, and the presence of three pairs of chemically equivalent carbons (C-2 and C-6, C-3 and C-5 and 3-OCH3 and 5-OCH3) was readily explained by the presence of a 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzene moiety and confirmed by an HSQC spectrum which indicated that the two-proton aromatic resonance at δH 6.35 (H-2, H-6) was connected to the carbon at δC 106.2.

Table 2.

13C NMR Data for compounds 1a – 6a (151 MHz, in CDCl3)

Carbon 1a 1ba 2 3 4a 5a 6a
1 136.2 132.3 133.0 131.5 134.1 136.5 199.9
2 106.2 111.4 112.2 105.7 106.5 102.9 41.6
3 153.0 146.4 148.8 146.9 153.01 153.4 36.7
4 136.3 143.9 147.3 133.0 136.6 137.8 105.2
5 153.0 114.0 111.1 146.9 153.01 153.4 169.0
6 106.2 122.0 121.2 105.7 106.5 102.9 101.3
7 37.5 36.8 36.7 37.3 43.4 92.5 34.7
8 44.7 45.0 44.9 44.9 76.4 44.6 135.8
9 14.4 14.2 14.3 14.3 19.7 17.5 117.1
1′ 57.1 57.2 57.2 57.2 122.3 113.0 138.1
2′ 106.1 106.2 106.2 106.2 109.5 152.7 154.3
3′ 145.1 145.1 145.1 145.2 141.3 112.7 105.4
4′ 163.8 163.7 163.8 163.7 146.2 141.7 129.4
5′ 100.4 100.3 100.4 100.4 97.7 142.4 105.4
6′ 202.8 202.0 202.9 203.1 149.8 107.7 154.3
7′ 43.4 43.3 43.4 43.6 34.2 33.6 40.5
8′ 132.9 133.0 133.0 133.0 137.3 136.8 136.8
9′ 118.1 118.1 118.1 118.1 115.3 115.4 116.4
3-OCH3 56.1 55.9 55.90 56.2 56.1 56.2
4-OCH3 60.9 55.88 60.9 60.9
5-OCH3 56.1 56.2 56.1 56.2
13-OCH3 55.9
16-OCH3 55.9
OCH2O 101.4 101.3 101.4 101.4 101.0 101.2 99.9
a

Data from reference 11.

The HMBC spectrum indicated correlations from H-2, H-6, 3-OMe, and 5-OMe to the carbons at δC 153.0 (C-3 and C-5). In addition, cross peaks were observed from the H-2, H-6, and 4-OMe to C-4 (δC 136.3). The substituted propyl group was determined to be attached to the trimethoxybenzene ring by the long range correlation of H-2 and H-6 to the methylene carbon at δC 37.5 (C-7).

graphic file with name nihms679309u1.jpg

Comparison of the 13C NMR data of 1a (Table 2) with those of 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-3′,4′-methylenedioxy-6′-oxo-Δ-2′,4′,8′-8.1′-neolignan (1b)23 indicated that they had identical cyclohexadienone rings. This conclusion was confirmed by analysis of the HMBC spectrum of 1a, which indicated cross peaks from the methylenedioxy signal at δH 5.84 and the singlets at δH 5.65 (H-5′) and 5.51 (H-2′) to C-4′ (δC 163.8) an d C-3′ (145.1). Furthermore, cross peaks were observed from H-5′, H-2′, and H-7′ to a quaternary carbon at δC 57.1 (C-1′). Additionally, H-5′, H-2′, and H-7′ displayed HMBC correlations to a ketocarbonyl at δC 202.8 (C-6′). Compound 1a was thus identified as 3,4,5-trimethoxy-3′,4′-methylenedioxy-6′-oxo-Δ-2′,4′,8′-8.1′-neolignan, and is named cymosalignan A.

The relative and absolute configurations of 1a were not assigned.

Cymosalignan B (2) was also obtained as an oil, and its 1H NMR spectrum was similar to that of 1a. An overlay of both spectra indicated that compound 2 contained the same features as 1a such as the 2-propenyl, the substituted propyl, and the methylenedioxy groups. The only difference was the presence of two methoxy groups in 2 instead of three as in compound 1a, and the aromatic region indicated an AMX spin system characteristic of a 1,3,4-trisubstituted benzene ring, suggesting that the 5-OMe group present at δH 3.83 in 1a was missing in 2. The mass spectrum of 2 showed a protonated molecular ion at m/z 357 [M+H]+ and the molecular formula was assigned as C21H24O5 by HRMS, indicating loss of a CH2O fragment compared to 1a. This evidence coupled with the NMR spectroscopic data confirmed that 2 is the 5-demethoxy derivative of 1a, i.e. 3,4-dimethoxy-3′,4′-methylenedioxy-6′-oxo-Δ-2′,4′,8′-8.1′-neolignan, or cymosalignan B.

Cymosalignan C (3) was isolated as an oil, for which analysis based on 13C NMR and HRESIMS (m/z = 373.1649 [M+H]+ and 395.1471 [M+Na]+) data, indicated a molecular formula of C21H24O6. The 1H NMR spectroscopic data of 3 (Table 1) were similar to those of compounds 1a and 2 and included all the signals of the 2-propenyl, methylenedioxy, and substituted propyl groups. Comparison of the spectroscopic data of 3 with those of 1a indicated that the only significant difference was the lack of a signal for the 4-methoxy group and the observation of a singlet at δC 3.87 integrating for 6 protons. The Δm of 14 Da between compounds 1a and 3 and the HMBC correlation of 4-OH (δH 5.37, s) and H-2, H-6 protons to C-3 (δC 146.9) and C-4 (δC 133.0), together with cross peaks between 4-OH and the 3-OMe protons to C-3, confirmed that compound 3 is the 4-O-demethyl derivative of 1a. It was thus identified as the new neolignan 4-hydroxy-3,4-dimethoxy-3′,4′-methylenedioxy-6′-oxo--Δ-2′,4′,8′,8.1′-neolignan or cymosalignan C.

Cymosalignans A (1a), B (2) and C (3) belong to the unusual 6′-oxo-8.1′ group of neolignans, and are related to the lignans isolated from Piper capense23 and to piperkadsin B [(7R,8S)-7-acetoxy-3,3′,4,4′-tetramethoxy-6′-oxo-Δ-2′,4′,8′-8.1′-lignan] isolated from Piper kadsura.24

Compound 4a was isolated as an oil. Its 1H NMR spectrum (Table 1) indicated signals of a 1,3,4,5- tetrasubstituted benzene with a side chain bearing an oxymethine at δH 4.39 (1H, J = 6.2 Hz, H-8, sextet). The second part of this structure gave signals of an allyl group characterized by olefinic methines at δH 5.89 (m, H-8′), and δH 5.01 (m, H-9′ab) and an aliphatic methylene at δH 3.27 (dt, J = 6.6, 1.5 Hz, H-7′ab). In addition signals attributed to a methylenedioxy group at δH 5.88 (d, J = 1.5 Hz), δH 5.87 (d, J = 1.5 Hz), and three aromatic singlets at δH 6.44 (2H), assignable to H-2 and H-6, at δH 6.63 for H-2′, and at δH 6.47 for H-5′ were observed. From its HMBC spectrum (Figure 1), long range correlations were observed between the methylenedioxy, H-2′ and H-5′ to C-4′ (δC 146.2) and C-3′ (δC 141.3). Furthermore, H-2′ (δH 6.63) showed a cross peak to the methylene carbon at δC 34.2 (C-7′).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Selected HMBC correlations in 4a.

An important HMBC correlation from the methine at δH 4.39 (H-8), the methylene at δH 3.27 (H2-7′) and the methine at δH 6.63 (H-2′) to the carbon at δH 149.8 (C-6′) indicated that 4a is the new neolignan 3′,4′-methylenedioxy-3,4,5-trimethoxy-Δ8′-8.O.6′-neolignan. Its configuration was tentatively assigned as S based on its positive optical rotation, as for synthetic (S)-virolongin B (4b), although the magnitude of the rotations differed significantly.25,26 The isolation of (S)-virolongin B from both stem and bark extracts supported this stereochemical assignment.

graphic file with name nihms679309u2.jpg

Ococymosin (5a) had the molecular formula C22H24O6 as determined by 13C NMR spectroscopic data and the positive ion HRESIMS. Its IR spectrum displayed absorption bands characteristic of aromatic ring double bond methines. Its 1H NMR spectrum (Table 1) exhibited two signals in the aromatic region corresponding to one A2 (δH 6.62, s, 2H) and one A (δH 6.52, br s, 1H) spin systems, the resonance of a secondary methyl at δH 1.48 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, H-9); a set of signals due to the protons of a primary allyl group at δH 3.33 (ddt, J = 15.5, 6.7, 1.5 Hz, H-7′a), 3.28 (ddt, J = 15.5, 6.7, 1.5, H-7′b), 5.97 (ddt, J = 16.7, 10.1, 6.7 Hz, H-8′), 5.04 (dq, J = 10.1, 1.5Hz, H-9′a), and 5.09 (dq, J = 16.7, 1.5 Hz, H-9′b); a methine proton on an oxygenated carbon of a dihydrofuran ring at δH 5.08 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-7); two signals corresponding to three methoxy groups at δH 3.84 (s, 3H, 4-OMe) and δH 3.86 (s, 6H, 3- and 5-OMe); and signals for two methylenedioxy protons at δH 5.87 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H) and 5.91 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H). The 13C NMR spectrum (Table 2) had 22 signals assignable to three methoxy carbons (δC 56.0, 56.1 and 56.1), a methylenedioxy carbon (δC 101.2) and 18 carbons (2 x C6-C3) ascribable to a dihydrobenzofuranoid neolignan skeleton.11 The 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopic data of 5a are similar to those of 5b, a dihydrobenzofuranoid lignan isolated from Piper capense (Piperaceae),11 except for the signals arising from ring A. In the 1H NMR spectrum of 5a, an A2 spin system was observed for ring A instead of the AMX system of 5b (δH 6.70, dd, J = 8.1, 1.9 Hz; 6.81, d, J = 1.9 Hz; 6.96, d, J = 8.1 Hz).11 Comparison of the 13C NMR data of 5a with those of 5b confirmed the presence of a 1,3,4,5-tetrasubstituted benzene ring in 5a instead of the 1,3,4-trisubstituted benzene ring in 5b. The attachment of the three methoxy groups at C-3, C-4, and C-5, the allyl group at C-1′, the methylenedioxy group at C-4′ and C-5′, and the presence of a 7.O.2′-8.3′ dihydrobenzofuran ring were substantiated by interpretation of the 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopic data of 5a, including COSY, HSQC, HMBC, and NOESY experiments. The HMBC correlations observed between the O-methyl protons at δH 3.86 and the carbons at δC 153.4 (C-3 and C-5), and between the O-methyl protons at δH 3.84 and the carbon at δC 137.8 (C-4), indicated that the three methoxy groups present in 5a were attached to C-3, C-4, and C-5 of ring A. Furthermore, the HMBC long-range correlations (Figure 2) between the allylic methylene protons at δH 5.04 and δH 5.09 and C-7′ (δC 33.6) on the one hand and between H2-7′ protons at δH 3.28 and 3.33 and the C-2′ and C-6′ carbons at δC 152.7 and 107.7, respectively, on the other hand suggested that the allyl group was located at C-1′. The methylenedioxy group was determined to be attached at C-4′ and C-5′ due to the HMBC cross peaks observed between the methylene protons at δH 5.87 and 5.91 (each a doublet, J = 1.5 Hz) and the C-4′ and C-5′ carbons at δC 141.7 and 142.4, respectively. The deshielding of the oxygen-bearing methine carbon (δC 92.5, C-7) and the long range correlations between H-7 proton at δH 5.08 and C-2 and C-6, and between the secondary methyl protons at δH 1.48 (H3-9) and C-2′ and C-3′ corroborated the presence of a 2-aryl-3-methyl-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran ring system.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Selected HMBC correlations in 5a.

The relative configuration of 5a was substantiated by the NOESY data, which showed a cross peak between H-7 and CH3-9, indicating the syn relationship of these groups, and by comparison of its optical rotation with the reported data for 5b, the structure of which has been confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis.11 From the above data, the structure of ococymosin (5a) was determined to be rel-(7R,8R)-Δ8′-3,4,5- trimethoxy-4′,5′-methylenedioxy-7.O.2′-8.3′-neolignan.

graphic file with name nihms679309u3.jpg

Compound 6a was isolated as a colorless oil. Its 13C NMR and HRESIMS data indicated the composition C21H24O6, indicative of 10 indices of hydrogen deficiency. The IR spectrum indicated the presence of an α,β-unsaturated carbonyl moiety (1655 cm−1). The combination of the 1H, 13C, and HSQC data indicated the presence of a two-proton aromatic singlet at δH 6.40, four methines (one aliphatic and three olefinic), six methylenes (one methylenedioxy, three aliphatic and two olefinic), a six-proton singlet at δH 3.79 attributed to two methoxy groups, and seven unprotonated carbons. The 2D NMR COSY and HMBC spectra indicated the presence of two distinct allyl groups. The first one comprised a multiplet of an olefinic methylene between δH 5.06 (m, H2-9), a methine at 5.74 (H-8), a methylene at δH 2.69 and 2.34 (H2-7); it was connected to a methine (H-2) and methylene (H2-3) to give the substructure CH2=CH-CH2-CH-CH2. The HMBC spectrum of 6a (Figure 3) revealed correlations between H-2, H-3, H-6, and H-7 to C-1 (δC 199.9). In addition, H-3, H-6, and the methylenedioxy (H2-10) protons exhibited cross peaks to the unprotonated carbon at δC 105.2 (C-4) and δC 169.0 (C-5). Correlations of the aromatic singlet at δH 6.40 (H-3′, H-5′) to the C-7′ methylene carbon (δC 40.5) were also observed. Further correlations were seen from the H-3′ and the methoxy singlet at δH 3.79 to the carbons at δH 154.3 (C-2′, C-6′) (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Selected HMBC correlations of 6a.

This evidence led to the assignment of structure 6a to the new compound. Didymochlaenone A (6b), a demethoxy analogue of 6a, and didymochlaenone B were previously isolated from Didymochlaena truncatula, also a plant from the Madagascar rain forest.22 The name didymochlaenone C is thus proposed for compound 6a.

graphic file with name nihms679309u4.jpg

The molecular formula of C20H20O5 for compound 7a was determined by a combination of 13C NMR and low and high resolution MS data. Its 1H (Table 3) and 13C NMR data (Table 4) were similar to those of the known compound sibyllenone (7b)7 with the signals of two methylenedioxy groups and an allyl group visible at δH 5.60 (dddd, J =16.9, 10.3, 8.9, 5.4 Hz, 1H, H-8′), 4.87 (m, 2H, H3-9′), 2.39 ddt (J =13.9, 5.4, 1.5, H-7′a) and 1.30 dd (J = 13.9, 8.9 Hz, H-7′b). The 1H and COSY data also indicated the C3 unit constituted of a methyl doublet at δH 1.06 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H, H3-9) bonded to a methine at δH 2.75 (quintet, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H, H-8) which further extended to the methine at δH 2.47 (brd, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H, H-7). The J7,8 value of 6.9 Hz indicated that these protons had an anti orientation, based on comparison with the similar values for the anti protons of sibyllenone and iso-ocobullenone and the larger value of 11.9 Hz for the syn protons of ocobullenone.7 The only difference between compounds 7a and 7b was the lack of a methoxy group at C-5 in 7a, and this was confirmed by the presence of three aromatic proton signals between δH 6.66–6.78. The analysis of the 2D NMR data from the HSQC and HMBC spectra confirmed the structure of 7a as a new natural product member of the bicyclo [3.2.1]octanoid neolignan family, identified as demethoxysibyllenone. The relative configuration was determined by the interpretation of the NOESY spectrum with a correlation between H-8 and H-2′. The absolute configurations of 7a, 7b, and the related compound 8 are shown as depicted by Zschocke et al.,7 and confirmed by analyses of their physical and spectroscopic data including the ECD spectrum of 8. Compound 7a is thus (7R,8S,1′S,3′S)-Δ8′-3,4-methylenedioxy-3′,4′-methylenedioxy-l′,2′,3′,6′-tetrahydro-6′-oxo-7.1′-8.3′-neolignan.

Table 3.

1H NMR Data for Compounds 7a–10a (600 MHz, CDCl3)

Position 7a 7ba 8b 9 10ab
2 6.72 brs 6.31–6.46 (m) 6.75 brs 6.42 brs 6.22 s
5 6.76 d (7.9)
6 6.66 brd (7.9) 6.31–6.46 (m) 6.76 brs 6.42 brs 6.22 s
7 2.47 brd (6.9)
anti
2.45 d (7.4)
anti
2.47 d (7.7)
Anti
2.50 d (7.7)
anti
3.42 d (12.0)
syn
8 2.75 quint (6.9) 2.75 q (6.8) 2.74 quint (6.8) 2.84 quint (6.9) 2.92 dq (12, 7.4)
9 1.06 d (6.9) 1.06 d (6.7) 1.06 d (6.8) 1.11 d (6.7) 0.87 d (7.4)
2′ 2.15 brd (11.0) 2.32 d (11.0) 2.14 d (10.9)
2.32 d (10.9)
2.14 d (10.7)
2.31 d (10.7)
2.19 d (11.0)
2.36 d (11.0)
2.09 d (10.7)
2.31 d (10.7)
5′ 5.47 s 5.47 (s) 5.46 s 5.51 s 5.61
7′a 2.39 ddt (13.9, 5.4, 1.5) 2.40–2.51 (m) 2.39 ddt (13.6, 5.4, 1.7) 2.48 brdd (13.8, 5.5) 2.10 dd (14, 9.0)
7′b 1.30 dd (13.9, 8.9) 1.32 dd (8.7) 1.30 dd (13.6, 9.0) 1.33 dd (13.8, 8.8) 2.60 dd (14, 5.8)
8′ 5.60 dddd (16.9, 10.3, 8.9, 5.4) 5.49–5.70 5.60 dddd (15.8, 10.5, 9.0, 5.5) 5.62 dddd (16.3, 10.9, 8.8, 5.5) 5.79 dddd (16.2, 10.4, 9.0, 5.8)
9′ 4.87 m 4.84–4.93 4.85 m, 4.88 m 4.89 m 5.09 m
3-OCH3 3.89 s 3.79 s
4-OCH3 3.88 s 3.82 s
5-OCH3 3.90 3.89 s 3.79 s
O-CH2-O 5.98 d (1.5) 5.97 d (1.5) 5.98 dd (1.5) 5.65 s, 5.88 s
Alk-O-CH2-O 5.69 s, 5.66 s 5.68 d (5.0) 5.97 d (1.4) 5.98 d (1.4) 5.73 s; 5.71 s 5.67 s; 5.70 s
a

Data from reference 7.

b

Spectrum obtained at 500 MHz

Table 4.

13C NMR Data for compounds 7a – 10a (151 MHz, CDCl3)

Carbon 7a 8 9 10a
1 132.8 132.7 134.7 130.9
2 NOa 108.2 NOa 108.3
3 146.9 147.6 153.1 152.4
4 147.9 138.2 137.4 137.0
5 108.1 140.8 153.1 152.4
6 NOa 108.2 NOa 108.3
7 55.8 56.0 56.3 54.3
8 48.8 48.9 48.5 44.3
9 15.5 15.6 15.5 14.3
1′ 55.9 55.9 55.8 59.7
2′ 44.7 44.8 44.7 46.7
3′ 89.9 90.0 89.9 91.3
4′ 176.1 176.1 176.1 177.7
5′ 96.5 96.6 96.6 98.2
6′ 201.2 201.1 201.1 200.5
7′ 36.5 36.6 36.3 37.7
8′ 135.4 135.5 135.3 134.5
9′ 117.0 117.0 117.0 118.5
3-OCH3 56.5 56.0
4-OCH3 60.9 60.8
5-OCH3 56.5 56.0
ArOCH2O 101.4 101.5
AlkOCH2O 101.2 101.3 101.4 101.6
a

Not observed

graphic file with name nihms679309u5.jpg

The molecular formula of 8 was determined to be C20H20O6 by 13C NMR and HRESIMS data. Its IR spectroscopic data were similar to those of 7a except for the addition of a hydroxy absorption band at 3420 cm−1. Its 1H NMR spectroscopic data were also similar to those of 7a and sibyllenone (7b), with signals assignable to two methylenedioxy groups, a secondary methyl group at δH 1.06 (d, J = 6.9 Hz), two aromatic protons (δH 6.75, br s and 6.76, br s, each 1H), an allyl group, and the α-proton of an α,β-unsaturated carbonyl group (δH 5.46, s). These observations suggested that 8 differed from sibyllenone by the replacement of the C-5 methoxy group by a hydroxy group. In confirmation, the 13C NMR chemical shifts of 8 were close to those of sibyllenone,7 except for the absence of the aromatic methoxy signal at δC 56.8 in 8 (Table 4). Its relative configurations at C-7, C-8, and C-1′ were confirmed by the observation of NOESY cross peaks between CH3-9 and H-7, between a 2′-proton and H-8, and between H-7 and H-8′. Compound 8 is thus assigned as 5-O-demethylsibyllenone. The assignments of all protons and carbons of 8 (Tables 3 and 4) were confirmed by HMBC and NOESY experiments (Figure 4); the coupling constants of the protons of the aromatic ring methylenedioxy groups differ slightly from those reported.7

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Key HMBC (left) and NOESY (right) correlations for 8.

The absolute configuration of 8 was assigned by analysis of its ECD spectrum. The negative Cotton effect for the carbonyl n→π* transition (305 nm)27 correlated with the back octant rule applied to a minimized energy (MM2) of 8. Its structure was thus assigned as (7R,8S,1′S,3′S)-Δ8′-5-hydroxy-3,4-methylenedioxy-3′,4′-methylenedioxy-l′,2′,3′,6′-tetrahydro-6′-oxo-7.1′-8.3′-neolignan.

Compound 9 was obtained as a white powder. Its molecular formula was determined as C22H26O6 on the basis of 13C NMR and HRESIMS data. The 1H NMR spectrum was similar to those of 7a and sibyllenone (7b) (Table 3), and the J7,8 value of 7.7 Hz indicated the anti orientation of H-7 and H-8. The 1H NMR spectrum also indicated all signals attributed to the bicylo[3.2.1]octanoid part; the signals of H-2 and H-6 appeared as a broad singlet at δH 6.42 (brs, 2H) instead of two separate signals as in 7a, indicating their symmetrical location. The major difference between the 1H NMR spectra of 7a and 9 was the absence in 9 of the signals due to the aryl methylenedioxy groups present in 7a and 7b, and the presence of signals for three methoxy groups at δH 3.89 (6H, 3,5-OCH3) and 3.88 (3H, 4-OCH3). The HMBC spectrum of 9 indicated key correlations of the 3,5-OCH3 protons to the carbons at δC 153.1 (C-3,5), and the correlations of the 4-OCH3 protons to the carbon at δC 137.4 (C-4). These facts led to the assignment of the structure of 9 as the new natural product (7R,8S,1′S,3′S)-Δ8′-3,4,5-trimethoxy-3′,4′-methylenedioxy-l′,2′,3′,6′-tetrahydro-6′-oxo-7.1′-8.3′-neolignan. The absolute configuration of 9 was assigned based on the comparison of its spectroscopic and physical data with those of 7a, 7b and 8.

Compound 10a had the molecular formula C22H26O6 as indicated by 13C NMR and positive ion HRESIMS data. The IR spectrum showed absorption bands suggestive of aromatic and double bond methine (2985 cm−1) and conjugated ketocarbonyl functions (1641 cm−1). The 1H NMR spectroscopic data of 10a (Table 3) were similar to those of 7a, 7b, and 8, and the signals for the bicyclooctanoid portion of the molecule closely matched those for ocobullenone (Table 4).7 In particular, the J7.8 value of 12 Hz indicated a syn relationship between H-7 and H-8. The 13C NMR spectrum of 10a exhibited signals due to three aromatic methoxy carbons [δC 60.8, 56.0 (x 2)] instead of signals for the methylenedioxy and methoxy groups of ocobullenone. Comparison of the 1H and 13C NMR data of 10a with those of ocobullenone (10b)5,7 confirmed its assignment as an analogue of ocobullenone. HMBC correlations between the methoxy protons at δH 3.79 and C-3 and C-5, between the methoxy protons at δH 3.82 and C-4, and between H-2/6 (δH 6.22) and C-1, C-3, C-4, C-5, and C-7 confirmed the presence of a 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzene moiety at C-7 in 10a (Figure 5). In addition, the HMBC correlations from the protons of the C-9 secondary methyl group to C-7 and the oxygen-bearing tertiary carbon (δC 91.3, C-3′), together with the long range cross peaks between H-2′ and C-8, C-7, C-7′, and C-4′, and between the olefinic H-5′ and C-1′ and C-3′ confirm the planar structure of 10a.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Key HMBC (left) and NOESY (right) correlations for 10a.

The relative and absolute configurations of 10a were determined by interpretation of the data obtained from NOESY experiments and by its ECD spectrum. NOESY correlations observed between H-7 and H-8, and H-7 and H-2′a, confirmed the relative configurations at C-7, C-8, C-1′, and C-3′ to be as depicted (Figure 5). Interpretation of the negative Cotton effect observed for the n→π* transition at 305 nm was facilitated by minimizing the energy using a molecular mechanics (MM2) computation of 10a. In the most stable conformation, the methoxylated aromatic ring made a major contribution to the negative Cotton effect. This ring was situated in front of the carbonyl group and contributed to the negative Cotton effect in the front quadrant of the octant rule.28,29 From these data, the absolute configuration of 10a was assigned as (7R,8R,1′R,3′R)-Δ8′-3,4,5-trimethoxy-3′,4′-methylenedioxy-l′,2′,3′,6′-tetrahydro-6′-oxo-7.1′-8.3′-neolignan.30

Compounds 7a10a belong to a rare group of bicyclo [3.2.1] octanoid neolignans possessing a 7.1′.8.3′ coupling with unique features such as the deoxygenated C-2′ between the bridge heads and the methylenedioxy group on the cyclohexenone ring. No biological reports have been published for this series of compounds, but their C-2 oxygenated counterparts and lacking the methylenedioxy group at C-3′ and C-4′ have been reported to possess potent anti-PAF (Platelet-Activating Factor) activity.31

Biological Activities

The biological activities of selected compounds are shown in Table 5. The new 8.O.6′-neolignan 4a, dihydrobenzofuranoid 5a, and bicyclo[3.2.1]octanoid (7a) all had in vitro activity against Aedes aegypti, with ≥ 80% mortality at 4 mg/mL.

Table 5.

Antiparasitic and Insecticidal Activities of Isolated Compounds

Compound Inhibition of P. falciparum Dd2 IC50 (μM) Activity against Aedes aegypti
4a NTa Activea
4b (Virolongin B) 3.3 ± 0.6 NTb
5a 0.45 ± 0.02 Activea
7a 14.6 ± 0.7 Activea
8 42 NTb
10a 7.7 ± 0.5 NTb
10b (Ocobullenone) 4.1 ± 0.8 NTb
Artemisinin 0.00082 ± 0.00002 NTb
a

Active: ≥ 80% mortality at 4 mg/mL.

b

Not tested

Ococymosin (5a) was the most active antiparasitic component among those isolated in the present study, with an IC50 value of 0.45 μM against the Dd2 strain of Plasmodium falciparum. Virolongin B (4b), compound 10a, and ocobullenone (10b) all had IC50 values in the single digit micromolar range, while compounds 7a and 8 had IC50 values in the double digit micromolar range. Lignans and neolignans have been reported to have a wide range of bioactivities such as antineoplastic,32 viral reverse transcriptase inhibitor,33 antimalarial,33 antileishmanial,34 and others. The antiplasmodial activity of virolongin B is not surprising since its isomer virolongin A has been reported to be active against both a chloroquine sensitive strain (PoW) and a chloroquine-resistant clone (Dd2) of Plasmodium falciparum (IC50 values 12.4 and 14.9 μM, respectively).35 This is the first report on the antiplasmodial activity of 7.O.2′-8.3′-neolignans and dihydrobenzofuranoid neolignans.

None of the isolated compounds significantly inhibited the proliferation of A2780 ovarian cancer cells.

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

General Experimental Procedures

Optical rotations were recorded on a JASCO P-2000 polarimeter. IR and UV spectra were measured on MIDAC M-series FTIR and Shimadzu UV-1201 spectrophotometers, respectively. ECD analysis was performed on a JASCO J-810 spectropolarimeter with a 0.1cm cell in MeOH at room temperature under the following conditions: speed 50 nm/min, time constant 1 s, band width 2.0 nm. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 500 spectrometer in CDCl3 with TMS as internal standard. Mass spectra were obtained on JEOL JMS-HX-110 and Agilent 6220 LC-TOF-MS. Preparative HPLC was performed using Shimadzu LC-10AT pumps coupled with a semi-preparative Varian Dynamax C18 column (5 μm, 250x10 mm), a Shimadzu SPD M10A diode array detector (DAD) and a SCL-10A system controller.

Insecticidal Bioassay

For in vitro evaluation, the actives were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and tested in a 96-well micotiter plate. For in vivo and in vitro evaluation in mosquitoes, the master plates containing 400 mg of a molecule dissolved in 100 mL of DMSO (equivalent to a 4000 ppm solution) are used. A master plate of assembled molecules contains 15 mL per well. To this plate, 135 mL of a 90:10 water:acetone mixture is added to each well. This solvent addition is completed shortly before actual run time on the Sagian to minimize any molecules incompatibility or stability issues. The Sagian robot is programmed to dispense 15 mL aspirations from the master plate into an empty 96-well shallow plate (“daughter” plate). There are 6 reps (“daughter” plates) created per master. The created daughter plates are then immediately infested with YFM larvae (Yellow Fever Mosquito, Aedes aegypti).

The day before plates are to be treated, mosquito eggs are placed in Millipore water containing liver powder to begin hatching (4 g into 400 mL). After the daughter plates are created using the Sagian robot, they are infested with 220 mL of the liver powder/larval mosquito mixture (about 1 day-old larvae). After plates are infested with mosquito larvae, a non-evaporative lid is used to cover the plate to reduce drying. Plates are held at room temperature for 3 days prior to grading. After 3 days, each well is observed and scored based on mortality.

For activity against Beet Armyworm (Spodoptera exigua), master plates containing 400 mg of a molecule dissolved in 100 mL of DMSO (equivalent to a 4000 ppm solution) are used. A master plate of assembled molecules contains 30 mL per well. To this plate, 270 mL of a 2:1 acetone:water mixture is added to each well. This solvent addition is completed shortly before actual run time on the Biomek robot to minimize any molecules incompatibility or stability issues. The Biomek is programmed to dispense 30 mL aspirations from the master plate onto the surface of a 96-well shallow-well plate (“daughter” plate) that has been pre-filled approximately half full with a multispecies lep diet. There are six reps (“daughter” plates) created per master. The created daughter plates are dried in a fume hood for 5 hours, and placed in sealed plastic tubs until the following day. The plates are then infested with unhatched beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua) eggs using a stainless steel “seeder”. After plates are infested with the eggs, a layer of cotton batting is placed over the plate, then sealed with a non-evaporative lid used to reduce drying. Plates are held at 28C in a high humidity chamber for 7 days prior to grading. After 7 days, each well is observed and scored based on mortality.

Antiproliferative Bioassay

The A2780 ovarian cancer cell line assay was performed at Virginia Tech as previously reported.36,37 The A2780 cell line is a drug-sensitive cell line.38

Intraerythrocytic Stages Antimalarial Bioassay

The effect of each fraction and pure compounds on parasite growth of Dd2 strain was measured in a 72 h growth assay in the presence of drug as described previously with minor modifications.39,40 Briefly, ring stage parasite cultures (200 μL per well, with 1% hematocrit and 1% parasitaemia) were grown for 72 h in the presence of increasing concentrations of the drug in a 5.05% CO2, 4.93% O2 and 90.2% N2 gas mixture at 37°C. After 72 h in culture, parasite viability was determined by DNA quantitation using SYBR Green I (50 μl of SYBR Green I in lysis buffer at 0.4 μl of SYBR Green I/ml of lysis buffer).40 The half-maximum inhibitory concentration (IC50) calculation was performed with GraFit software using a nonlinear regression curve fitting. IC50 values are the average of three independent determinations with each determination in duplicate, and are expressed ± S.E.M.

Plant Material

Stems and wood of Ocotea cymosa (Nees) Palacky (collection: F. Ratovoson 251) were collected at an elevation of 1000 m in July 2000 in rainforest near the village of Ambatondrazaka, on the northern edge of Zahamena National Park, 17°28′45″S, 048°44′10″E, Madagascar. The sample collected was from a 12 m tree, 15 cm diameter at breast height, with yellow flower buds and open yellow flowers. The plant taxonomy was confirmed by Dr. Henk van der Werff (Missouri Botanical Garden).

Duplicate voucher specimens of each plant were deposited at Centre National d’Application des Recherches Pharmaceutiques (CNARP), the Herbarium of the Parc Botanique et Zoologique de Tsimbazaza, Antananarivo, Madagascar (TAN), the Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri (MO), and the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle in Paris, France (P).

Extraction

A ground sample of O. cymosa stems (310 g) was extracted with EtOH at room temperature to yield 9.5 g of crude EtOH extract designated MG 0448. A ground sample of O. cymosa wood (137 g) was extracted with EtOH at room temperature to yield 6.0 g of crude EtOH extract designated MG 0450.

Isolation of Compounds with Insecticidal Activity from O. cymosa Stems

The extract MG 0448 exhibited activity against Aedes aegypti (AEDSAE) and Spodoptera exigua (LAPHEG) in high throughput screening (HTS). The level 2 screen however indicated weak activity with an MIC of 273 μg/cm2 for AEDSAE. A total of 1.0 g of the extract MG 0448 was pretreated on polyamide, the resulting extract was dissolved in MeOH, and 50 g of Celite was added. The mixture was dried on a rotary evaporator and then loaded in a 80 g cartridge and chromatographed on a silica gel column on a Combiflash instrument with elution by CH2Cl2-MeOH. Twelve fractions were collected and tested for activity against AEDSAE and LAPHEG. From the HTS results it was observed that only fractions 5, 6, 7, and 8 had activity against AEDSAE, with fractions 7 and 8 as the most active with 60 and 73 % mortality at 100 μg. Trituration of the weakly active fraction 7 (81.0 mg) afforded a white powder which was identified as sibyllenone (7b, 64.0 mg). Purification of the mother liquor using preparative HPLC gave sibyllenone and the new didymochlaenone C (6a) (3.0 mg).

Fraction 8 (600.2 mg) was purified using a combination of Sephadex LH-20 (CH2Cl2/50%MeOH), preparative TLC, and HPLC to yield 6 compounds. The new metabolites cymosalignan A (1a, 30.0 mg), B (2, 5.0 mg) and C (3, 1.2 mg), and compounds 8 (136 mg) and 9 (10 mg) were obtained, together with the known 3,4,5,3′,5′-pentamethoxy-8.O.4′-neolignan (45.5 mg) and sibyllenone (7b, 3.2 mg). Purification of fraction F5 on preparative HPLC yielded the three new compounds: 8 (31.0 mg), ococymosin (5a) (88 mg), and didymochlaenone C (6a) (2.0 mg) as well as sibyllenone (4.0 mg). Purification of fraction F6 gave the new compounds 4a (10 mg), 7a (5.0 mg) and the known didymochlaenone B (3.0 mg).

Isolation of Compounds with Antimalarial Activity from O. cymosa Wood

A total of 1.8 g of the wood extract was made available to Virginia Tech. To locate the types of metabolites responsible for its activity, 100 mg of the crude EtOH extract was subjected to a liquid-liquid partition using hexanes, EtOAc, and H2O to afford 18.9 mg of active hexanes fractions (IC50 1.25 μg/mL). HPLC was performed on this fraction on a C18 column with a solvent gradient from H2O:MeOH (syst I): 20:80 to 18:82 for 10 min, to 15:85 from 10 to 15 min, hold at 15:85 for 5 min, to 10:90 from 20 to 25 min, and to 0:100 from 25 min to 27 min, ending with 100% MeOH for 36 min. Five compounds were recovered: 3 (tR: 19.76 min; IC50 42.1 μM, 2.6 mg), virolongin B (4b, tR: 22.88 min; IC50 3.1 μM, 1.1 mg), 8 (tR: 24.11 min; IC50 28.4 μM, 1.4 mg), 10a (tR: 27.76 min; IC50 40.5 μM, 1.4 mg), and 5a (tR: 29.27 min; IC50 4.7 μM, 2.1 mg).

Cymosalignan A (1a)

Colorless oil; [α]25D −22 (c 0.2, MeOH); UV (λmax from HPLC) 318, 256 nm; IR (νmax, cm−1): 3079, 2916, 1622, 1590, 1509, 1465, 1413, 1387, 1330, 1220, 1198, 1118, 1042, 1009, 949. 1H and 13C NMR data, see Tables 1 and 2; (+)-HRESIMS m/z 387.1801 [M+H]+ (Calcd. for C22H27O6+, 387.1802), 409.1616 [M+Na]+ (Calcd. for C22H26O6Na+, 409.1622),

Cymosalignan B (2)

Colorless oil; [α]25D −21.0 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (λmax from HPLC) 320, 258 nm; IR (νmax, cm−1): 3074, 2920, 1625, 1590, 1513, 1463, 1410, 1387, 1261, 1222, 1140, 1026, 943; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Tables 1 and 2; (+)-HRESIMS: m/z 379.1509 [M+Na]+ (Calcd. for C21H24O5Na+, 379.1516).

Cymosalignan C (3)

Colorless oil; [α]25D −16 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (λmax from HPLC) 217, 250, 318 nm; IR (νmax, cm−1): 3396, 2929, 1624, 1517, 1460, 1412, 1389, 1327, 1213, 1114, 1041, 937; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Tables 1 and 2; (+)-HRESIMS m/z 373.1649 [M+H]+ (Calcd. for C21H25O6+, 373.1646) 395.1471 [M+Na]+ (Calcd. for C21H24O6Na+, 395.1465), 767.3057 [2M+Na]+ (Calcd. for C42H48O12Na+, 767.3038).

Compound 4a

Colorless oil; [α]25D +23 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (λmax from HPLC): 300, 256, 234 nm; IR (νmax, cm−1): 2933, 2837, 1645, 1587, 1508, 1457, 1421, 1361, 1326, 1245, 1200, 1124, 1098, 1056, 1005, 922, 837: 1H and 13C NMR data, see Tables 1 and 2; (+)-HRESIMS m/z 387.1805 [M+H]+ (Calcd. for C22H27O6+, 387.1802), 409.1623 [M+Na]+ (Calcd. for C22H26O6Na+, 409.1622), 795.3343 [2M+Na]+ (Calcd. for C44H52O12Na+, 795.3351).

Ococymosin (5a)

Colorless oil; [α]25D +42 (c 0.9, MeOH); UV (λmax from HPLC) 300, 240 nm; IR (νmax, cm−1): 2922, 2837, 1657, 1641, 1593, 1501, 1478, 1455, 1414, 1365, 1322, 1269, 1216, 1158, 1039, 996, 954; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Tables 1 and 2; (+)-HRESIMS m/z 404.1465 [M+Na]+ (Calcd. for C22H24O6Na+, 407.1465), 791.3032 [2M+Na]+ (Calcd. for C44H48O12Na+, 791.3038).

Didymochlaenone C (6a)

Colorless oil; [α]25D −119 (c 0.2, MeOH); UV (λmax from HPLC) 246, 280 nm; IR (νmax, cm−1): 3075, 2935, 2840, 1655, 1588, 1496, 1459, 1420, 1333, 1278, 1242, 1180, 1123, 1041, 981, 909; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Tables 1 and 2; (+)-HRESIMS m/z 373.1864 [M+H]+ (Calcd. for C21H25O6+, 373.1651), 395.1452 [M+Na]+ (Calcd for C21H24O6Na+, 395.1465), 767.3008 [2M+Na]+ (Calcd. for C42H48O12Na+, 767.3038).

Demethoxysibyllenone (7a)

Colorless oil; [α]25D −144 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (λmax from HPLC) 240, 290 nm; IR (νmax, cm−1): 2962, 2906, 1646, 1503, 1488, 1443, 1142, 1361, 1251, 1230, 1199, 1132, 1095, 1037, 928; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Tables 2 and 4; (+)-HRESIMS m/z 341.1416 [M+H]+ (Calcd. for C20H21O5+, 341.1384), 363.1172 [M+Na]+ (Calcd. for C20H20O5Na+, 363.1203), 703.2492 [2M+Na]+ (Calcd. for C40H40O10Na+, 703.2514).

Demethylsibyllenone (8)

Amorphous powder; [α]25D +6, (c 0.01, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax nm (log ε): 205 (3.31) 240 (2.7), 300 (1.9); ECD (c 0.02, MeOH) λmax (Δε) 305 (−1.8), 251 (1.3), 225 (−3.1); IR (film) 3420, 1640, 2985, 1512, 1424, 1205, 1043, 920 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Tables 2 and 4; (+)-ESI-HRMS m/z 357.1342 [M+H]+ (Calcd. for C20H21O6+, 357.1333).

(7R,8S,1′S,3′S)-Δ8′-3,4,5-Trimethoxy-3′,4′-methylenedioxy-l′,2′,3′,6′-tetrahydro-6′-oxo-7.1′-8.3′-neolignan (9)

Colorless oil; [α]25D −51 (c 0.02, MeOH); UV (λmax from HPLC) 217, 250 nm; IR (νmax, cm−1): 2933, 2837, 1645, 1587, 1508, 1457, 1422, 1362, 1326, 1245, 1200, 1124, 1098, 1057, 1006, 922; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Tables 2 and 4; (+)-HRESIMS m/z 387.2360 [M+H]+ (Calcd. for C22H27O6+, 387.1802), 409.1620 [M+Na]+ (Calcd. for C22H26O6Na+, 409.1622), 795.3378 [2M+Na]+ (Calcd. for C44H52O12Na+, 795.3351).

(7R,8R,1′R,3′R)-Δ8-3,4,5-Trimethoxy-3′,4′-methylenedioxy-l′,2′,3′,6′-tetrahydro-6′-oxo-7.1′-8.3′-neolignan (10a)

Colorless oil; [α]25D +101, (c 0.02, MeOH); UV (λmax from HPLC): 217, 250 nm; ECD (c 0.1, MeOH) λmax (Δε) 305 (−1.42), 259 (1.5), 240 (−3.2); IR (νmax, cm−1): 3074, 2932, 2837, 1643, 1587, 1509, 1454, 1425, 1381, 1362, 1322, 1248, 1200, 1120, 1057, 1003, 919; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Tables 3 and 4; (+)-HRESIMS: m/z 409.1596 [M+Na]+ (Calcd. for C22H26O6Na+, 409.1622 ), 445.2303 [M+CH3CN+NH4]+ (Calcd. for C24H33O6N2+, 445.2333).

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Fogarty International Center, the National Cancer Institute, the National Science Foundation, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, the National Institute of Mental Health, the Office of Dietary Supplements, and the Office of the Director of NIH, under Cooperative Agreement U01 TW000313 with the International Cooperative Biodiversity Groups. This project was also supported by the National Research Initiative of the Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service, USDA, Grant #2008-35621-04732, and by the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine under Cooperative Agreement U01 TW000313-19S1. Jessica Wiley was supported by NSF S-STEM award (DUE-0850198). This work was also supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant no. CHE-0619382 for purchase of the Bruker Avance 600 NMR spectrometer and Grant no. CHE-0722638 for the purchase of the Agilent 6220 mass spectrometer. We thank Mr. B. Bebout for obtaining the mass spectra. Field work essential for this project was conducted under a collaborative agreement between the Missouri Botanical Garden and the Parc Botanique et Zoologique de Tsimbazaza and a multilateral agreement between the ICBG partners, including the Centre National d’Applications des Recherches Pharmaceutiques. We gratefully acknowledge courtesies extended by the Government of Madagascar (Ministère des Eaux et Forêts). These supports are gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

1

Supporting Information

D and 2D-NMR spectra of all new compounds (110a) are available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

REFERENCES AND NOTES

  • 1.Biodiversity Conservation and Drug Discovery in Madagascar, Part 60. For part 59, see Rasamison VE, Rakotondraibe LH, Slebodnick C, Brodie PJ, Ratsimbason M, TenDyke K, Shen Y, Randrianjanaka LM, Kingston DGI. Org Lett. 2014;16:2626–2629. doi: 10.1021/ol500775r.
  • 2.Mabberley DJ. The Plant-Book, a Portable Dictionary of the Higher Plants. 2. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, England: 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van der Werff H. Adansonia, sér 3. 2013;35:235–279. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Louppe D, Oteng-Amoako AA, Brink M. Plant Resources of Tropical Africa, Timbers 1. Vol. 7. Backhuys Publishers; Leiden, Netherlands: 2008. p. 704. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sehlapelo BM, Drewes SE, Sandor P. Phytochemistry. 1993;32:1352–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Drewes SE, Horn MM, Sehlapelo BM, Ramesar N, Field JS, Shaw RS, Sandor P. Phytochemistry. 1995;38:1505–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zschocke S, van Staden J, Paulus K, Bauer R, Horn MM, Munro OQ, Brown NJ, Drewes SE. Phytochemistry. 2000;54:591–595. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(00)00163-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Coy-Barrera ED, Cuca-Suarez LE, Sefkow M. Phytochemistry. 2009;70:1309–1314. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Barbosa-Filho JM, Da SMS, Yoshida M, Gottlieb OR. Phytochemistry. 1989;28:2209–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Funasaki M, Lordello ALL, Viana AM, Santa-Catarina C, Floh EIS, Yoshida M, Kato MJ. J Braz Chem Soc. 2009;20:853–859. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Green TP, Galinis DL, Wiemer DF. Phytochemistry. 1991;30:1649–1652. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Garcez FR, da Silva AFG, Garcez WS, Linck G, Matos MdFC, Santos ECS, Queiroz LMM. Planta Med. 2011;77:383–387. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1250401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Monte NRL, Sousa LMA, Dias CS, Barbosa FJM, Oliveira MR. Z Naturforsch, C: J Biosci. 2008;63:681–686. doi: 10.1515/znc-2008-9-1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Montrucchio DP, Miquel OG, Zanin SMW, Araujo dSG, Cardozo AM, Santos ARS. Planta Med. 2012;78:1543–1548. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1315026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhou BN, Johnson RK, Mattern MR, Wang X, Hecht SM, Beck HT, Ortiz A, Kingston DGI. J Nat Prod. 2000;63:217–221. doi: 10.1021/np990442s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Garett R, Romanos MTV, Borges RM, Santos MG, Rocha L, da Silva AJR. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2012;22:306–313. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.WHO. WHO: WHO website. 2013. The secretariat’s report on progress in implementation of resolution WHA64.17 and on global efforts to control and eliminate malaria. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Harinantenaina L, Bowman JD, Brodie PJ, Slebodnick C, Callmander MW, Rakotobe E, Randrianaivo R, Rasamison VE, Gorka A, Roepe PD, Cassera MB, Kingston DGI. J Nat Prod. 2013;76:388–393. doi: 10.1021/np300750q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kingston DGI. J Nat Prod. 2011;74:496–511. doi: 10.1021/np100550t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yang XH, Xin, Ahmat Mamat. Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi. 2008;33:397–402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Forrest JE, Heacock RA, Forrest TP. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans. 1974;1:205–209. doi: 10.1039/p19740000205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cao S, Radwan MM, Norris A, Miller JS, Ratovoson F, Andrianjafy M, Andriantsiferana R, Rasamison VE, Rakotonandrasana S, Kingston DGI. J Nat Prod. 2006;69:284–286. doi: 10.1021/np050351x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Green TP, Wiemer DF. Phytochemistry. 1991;30:3759–3762. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lin LC, Shen CC, Shen YC, Tsai TH. J Nat Prod. 2006;69:842–844. doi: 10.1021/np0505521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bárbosa-Filho JM, Da Silva MS, Yoshida M, Gottlieb OR. Phytochemistry. 1989;28:2209–2211. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ren X, She X, Peng K, Xingang X, Sua Y, Pan X, Zhang H. J Chin Chem Soc. 2004;51:969–974. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Berova N, Nakanishi K, Woody RW. Circular Dichroism Principles and Applications. 2. Wiley-VCH; New York, NY: 2000. p. 877. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wragniere G. J Am Chem Soc. 1966;88:3937–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lightner DA, Chang TC, Hefelfinger DT, Jackman DE, Wijekoon WMD, Givens JW., III J Am Chem Soc. 1985;107:7499–508. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.There is some confusion in the literature on the relative configuration of ocobullenone and sibyllenone. Zschocke et al. (2000) assign sibyllenone as rel-7S,8S,1′S,3′S, which would make ocobullenone rel-7S,8R,1′R,3′R, but Sehlapelo et al., SciFinder, and ChemDraw all assign ocobullenone as 7R,8R,1′R,3′R. We have used the latter set of descriptors in this work.
  • 31.Kuroyanagi M, Yoshida K, Yamamoto A, Miwa M. Chem Pharm Bull. 2000;48:832–837. doi: 10.1248/cpb.48.832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Apers S, Vlietinck A, Pieters L. Phytochem Rev. 2004;2:201–207. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ward RS. Nat Prod Rep. 1999;16:75–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Barata LES, Santos LS, Ferri PH, Phillipson JD, Paine A, Croft SL. Phytochemistry. 2000;55:589–595. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(00)00240-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kraft C, Jenett-Siems K, Kohler I, Tofern-Reblin B, Siems K, Bienzle U, Eich E. Phytochemistry. 2002;60:167–173. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9422(02)00101-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cao S, Brodie PJ, Miller JS, Randrianaivo R, Ratovoson F, Birkinshaw C, Andriantsiferana R, Rasamison VE, Kingston DGI. J Nat Prod. 2007;70:679–681. doi: 10.1021/np060627g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pan E, Cao S, Brodie PJ, Callmander MW, Randrianaivo R, Rakotonandrasana S, Rakotobe E, Rasamison VE, TenDyke K, Shen Y, Suh EM, Kingston DGI. J Nat Prod. 2011;74:1169–1174. doi: 10.1021/np200093n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Louie KG, Behrens BC, Kinsella TJ, Hamilton TC, Grotzinger KR, McKoy WM, Winker MA, Ozols RF. Cancer Res. 1985;45:2110–2115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bennett TN, Paguio M, Gligorijevic B, Seudieu C, Kosar AD, Davidson E, Roepe PD. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:1807–10. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1807-1810.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Smilkstein M, Sriwilaijaroen N, Kelly JX, Wilairat P, Riscoe M. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:1803–6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1803-1806.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES