Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2015 Apr 16;6:6860. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7860

Demonstration of relativistic electron beam focusing by a laser-plasma lens

C Thaury 1,a,*, E Guillaume 1,*, A Döpp 1,2,*, R Lehe 1, A Lifschitz 1, K Ta Phuoc 1, J Gautier 1, J-P Goddet 1, A Tafzi 1, A Flacco 1, F Tissandier 1, S Sebban 1, A Rousse 1, V Malka 1
PMCID: PMC4410646  PMID: 25880791

Abstract

Laser-plasma technology promises a drastic reduction of the size of high-energy electron accelerators. It could make free-electron lasers available to a broad scientific community and push further the limits of electron accelerators for high-energy physics. Furthermore, the unique femtosecond nature of the source makes it a promising tool for the study of ultrafast phenomena. However, applications are hindered by the lack of suitable lens to transport this kind of high-current electron beams mainly due to their divergence. Here we show that this issue can be solved by using a laser-plasma lens in which the field gradients are five order of magnitude larger than in conventional optics. We demonstrate a reduction of the divergence by nearly a factor of three, which should allow for an efficient coupling of the beam with a conventional beam transport line.

Inline graphicLaser-driven plasmas can accelerate electrons in set-ups far smaller than conventional particle accelerators, but beam divergence is a problem. Here, the authors demonstrate a laser-plasma lens that can focus the beam thanks to field gradients five order of magnitude larger than using traditional optics.

Electron beams from laser-plasma accelerators1,2,3 have typical normalized transverse emittances of about or below 1 mm mrad (refs 4, 5, 6, 7), comparable or even smaller than those of linear accelerators delivering similar energies8,9. Yet, this small emittance is mostly due to a sub-micrometer source size10, while the beams typically have rather large divergence of a few milliradians. Their energy spread, of a couple of per cents11, is also at least one order of magnitude larger than in linear accelerators. This raises several issues for the beam transport and hence for key applications of laser-plasma accelerators such as free-electron lasers and high-energy colliders12,13,14,15. In particular, the transverse emittance tends to increase during a free drift because electrons with different energies rotate with different velocities in the transverse phase space16. The emittance increase is tolerable17 if the drift length Inline graphic. Here Inline graphic is the initial normalized emittance, γ0 is the mean Lorentz factor, σE is the root mean square (r.m.s.) relative energy spread and σθ is the r.m.s. divergence. Regarding state of the art laser-plasma accelerators5,7,11,18, the above condition indicates that the drift length should be smaller than 1–5 cm, depending on the exact conditions. In other words, electrons must be focused within a few centimeters from the accelerator exit in order to be transported efficiently.

Focusing the beam within such a short distance requires very high transverse field gradients. Quadrupole magnets, which are generally used to transport electron beams, operate at gradients of ∼50 T m−1, which is two orders of magnitude less than required. Although using non-adjustable permanent magnet configurations with millimetre-size aperture, field gradients of up to 500 T m−1 have been reported19, further enhancement is limited due to manufacturing issues, demagnetization effects and so on. An electron beam transport line based on quadrupole technology will therefore degrade the quality of a laser-plasma electron beam, rendering it useless for most applications. As they can sustain much higher gradients, plasmas could help to drastically miniaturize focusing optics, similar to the miniaturization achieved by laser-plasma accelerators, and hence to avoid any emittance growth. Incidentally, the idea to use plasma to focus an electron beam20 is almost as old as the idea to use plasma to accelerate electrons21. It was proposed to focus an electron beam using the radial fields created in the wake of the electron beam itself, when it propagates in a plasma. The so-called plasma lens was demonstrated in the context of conventional accelerators22,23,24,25, but it has not been considered for focusing electron beams from laser-plasma accelerators owing to the ultrashort length of these beams. Indeed, there is always a finite length at the bunch head over which the focusing is very non-uniform26,27; for ultrashort bunches from laser-plasma accelerators this length is comparable to the bunch length28. The laser-plasma lens was recently proposed, and validated by three-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations, to solve this issue29,30.

In the following, we present an experimental demonstration of this concept. First, we explain the principle of the laser-plasma lens. Then, we show that the strength of the lens can be optimized by tuning both the distance between the accelerator and the lens, and the electron density in the lens. Finally, we analyse the chromaticity of the lens and discuss the results.

Results

Principle of the laser-plasma lens

In a laser-plasma accelerator, the wakefields in which electrons are accelerated present both longitudinal components, which are responsible for the energy gain31, and transverse components, which make electrons oscillate and lead to betatron radiation32. The idea of the laser-plasma lens is to use these transverse fields to focus the electron beam. Its principle is illustrated in Fig. 1a. A laser pulse drives a wakefield in a first gas jet, diffracts in free space, and drives again a wakefield in a second jet. As a result, an electron beam is generated and accelerated in the first jet, it then drifts in the free space, where the interaction with the plasma is negligible, and is focused by the transverse components of the wakefield in the second jet. In general, transverse oscillations in a laser wakefield cannot be used to focus an electron beam because the beam electrons oscillate out of phase (there is no correlation between the electron position and its propagation angle). In a laser-plasma lens, the required synchronization is operated by the free drift. During the drift, the trajectory of individual electrons is r(z)=r0+θ0z, with r0 and θ0 being the transverse position and propagation angle, respectively, at the accelerator end, and z is the longitudinal distance from the accelerator end. Hence, for z>>r0/θ0, r is almost proportional to θ0, the position is strongly correlated to the propagation angle. Because of this correlation, electrons oscillate almost in phase in the second laser wakefield (the laser-plasma lens), except for a small detuning arising from the beam energy spread (which impacts the oscillation frequency) and from the dependance of r on r0. Thus, the plasma can act as a lens whose strength depends on its length and density. More specifically, the electron beam will be collimated if the focusing fields vanish when the transverse momentum is minimum for most electrons.

Figure 1. Principle scheme of the laser-plasma lens.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) An electron beam is accelerated in the first gas jet (accelerator), then it enters free space where it diverges and is eventually focused in the second gas jet (lens). The same laser triggers a wakefield in both gas jets. Electron spectra are measured using an electron spectrometer consisting of a dipole magnet and a phosphor screen, imaged by a CCD camera. (b) Phase spaces at the end of the acceleration (I), drift (II) and focusing (III) stages.

The principle of the laser-plasma lens is further illustrated by the phase-space traces in Fig. 1b. The free drift creates a correlation between r and θ, then the phase-space trace rotates in the second gas jet, leading to a decrease of the beam divergence. The trace area gives the transverse emittance, which is conserved during the focusing process. This emittance conservation can be used to estimate the minimum divergence σθ,min≈ɛN/(γσθL), where ɛN and σθ are the normalized emittance and the r.m.s. divergence at the accelerator end, respectively, and L is the distance between the two gas jets. We see that the drift length L is a key parameter to enhance the collimation. Note that this is a rough estimate, which assumes that the transverse fields in the lens are perfectly linear and neglects both the increase of the beam size during the phase-space rotation and chromatic effects, that is, influence of the beam energy spread; a more accurate analysis shows similar trends29. Note also that a noticeable electron density is tolerable in the drift space as long as the transverse forces do no prevent the electron beam to diverge. While σθ,min decreases as L increases, longer drift lengths do not necessarily imply smaller divergences. As the laser diffracts while propagating in free space, the laser intensity and thus the wakefield amplitude in the second jet decrease with increasing L, resulting in only a partial collimation of the electrons for long L. This puts an upper limit on the drift length, meaning that there is always a trade-off between low σθ,min and efficient wakefield generation (necessary to get an actual divergence reduction).

Influence of the drift length

The laser-plasma lens, in the collimation configuration, was demonstrated at Laboratoire d'Optique Appliquée using the Salle Jaune laser system (see Methods section for information on the laser system, the gas targetry and divergence measurements). The measured density profile is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. At the end of the accelerator stage, electrons had a mean energy of ≈241±12 MeV (r.m.s. error) and a beam divergence of ≈4.1±0.6 mrad. The electron beam had a few pC charge and was stable shot-to-shot, suggesting that electrons are injected into the accelerator by longitudinal self-injection33. The laser-plasma lens does not modify significantly the charge, the mean energy or the spectrum shape (Fig. 2a). In contrast, Fig. 2b shows that the beam divergence can strongly decrease in the lens, down to 1.6 mrad. The final divergence depends on the distance L from the accelerator to the lens. It decreases as L increases for Inline graphic mm and increases with L for Inline graphicmm. The evolution of the divergence is governed by two effects, namely the decrease of the minimum achievable divergence σθ,min and the decrease of the laser intensity, which reduces the strength of the focusing fields for long L. Indeed, the Rayleigh length at the accelerator exit is <400 μm (see Methods section). After 1.8 mm of propagation, the laser beam diameter and intensity are thus Φ>54 μm full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) and I<8.3 × 1017 W cm−2. Therefore, the wakefield in the lens is in the linear regime and the strength of the focusing fields strongly depends on the laser beam size and intensity. More precisely, the gradient of the focusing fields in the lens evolves as (ref. 29) z−4. As a result, these fields can be too strong for short L, leading to excessive focusing, and too low for long L, leading to insufficient focusing. In Fig. 2, the transverse force seems to vanish for Inline graphic mm, while the lowest divergence is obtained for L≈1.8 mm. Note that for the shortest lengths, the wakefield may be in the nonlinear regime.

Figure 2. Influence on the electron beam divergence of the distance between the accelerator and the lens L.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Electron spectrum before and after the lens, normalized by 1.3 × 105. The distance between the two stages is L=1.8 mm. (b) FWHM beam divergence, at 270 MeV, as a function of L (blue diamonds). The divergence measured without the laser-plasma lens is indicated by the black diamonds on the right. The peak electron density in the focusing stage is ∼3.9 × 1018 cm−3. Data points were averaged over 10 shots; the vertical error bars correspond to the s.e.m. and the horizontal bars correspond to the precision on the measurement of L. Two series of 10 shots were fired for L=2.3 mm, and the case without lens. (c) Typical angularly resolved spectrum without laser-plasma lens. (d) Typical spectrum obtained for L=1.8 mm. The colour scale indicates the number of electrons per MeV and mrad, divided by 17,000.

Influence of the plasma-lens density

In addition to the drift length, the electron density n2 and the length of the second jet can also impact the lens properties. The influence of the electron density is illustrated in Fig. 3. According to the model from ref. 29, the focusing force varies as Inline graphic, where Inline graphic is the plasma wave vector, σz is the r.m.s. length of the laser pulse and d is the distance between the laser and the considered electron. The term in brackets corresponds to the amplitude of the transverse wakefield, it is maximum when the laser pulse is resonant with the plasma wave, that is, for kpσz=1. The strength of the lens depends also on the position of the electron beam in the wakefield. This effect is described by the sine term; electrons experience the largest focusing force when kpd=π/2 and are defocused for kpd>π. The combination of both terms leads to a complex influence of the electron density on the focusing strength. For low densities (Inline graphic cm−3 in Fig. 3), the focusing fields are very weak and the divergence is hardly reduced. As density increases, the transverse focusing fields rise, which leads to the desired beam collimation. In Fig. 3, the lowest divergence is obtained for n2≈4.3 × 1018 cm−3. The fact that the divergence remains almost constant for higher densities suggests that the focusing force has a local maximum around n2≈4.3 × 1018 cm−3. For even higher densities (not investigated in the experiment), the divergence should increase and eventually exceed the initial divergence when the fields become defocusing (for kpd>π). Note that, for long L, the mean density, which is effectively experienced by the electron beam during the focusing process, may be significantly smaller than the peak density indicated in Fig. 3, because the focusing process is likely to occur only in the rising edge of the second gas jet (the focusing force decreases as z−4).

Figure 3. Influence on the electron beam divergence of the peak electron density in the second gas jet (the laser-plasma lens).

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The divergence was measured for an electron energy of 270 MeV. The distance between the two stages is L=2.3 mm. Data points were averaged over at least 11 shots; the vertical error bars correspond to the s.e.m. and the horizontal bar correspond to the precision on the backing pressure. The analysis of the interferograms leads to an additional systematic error on the density of ±5%.

Chromaticity of the lens

Up to this point, the electron beam was implicitly assumed to be monoenergetic, and in Figs 2b and 3 only the divergence at 270 MeV was considered. Yet, a careful analysis of the angularly resolved electron spectra in Fig. 2c,d reveals that electrons of different energies are not focused to the same extend. This is shown more clearly in Fig. 4, which displays the reduction factor of the beam divergence as a function of both the electron energy and the distance between the two stages. A couple of observations can be made from this plot. First, the reduction factor is larger towards higher energies. This is likely due to the decrease of σθ,min at higher energies, both because σθ,min varies as (γσθ)−1, and because in this particular experiment, the divergence σθ at the accelerator end increases with γ. Second, the optimal length L decreases as the electron energy increases. This is because the amplitude of the transverse fields required to focus the beam increases with the electron energy. Lengthening L tends to lessen the focusing fields and hence enhances the focusing of low-energy electrons (similar results can be obtained by decreasing the electron density). Nonetheless, Figs 2b,c and 4 show that an electron beam with an energy spread exceeding 100 MeV can be strongly focused, as a whole, using a laser-plasma lens.

Figure 4. Chromaticity of the laser-plasma lens.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The colour map shows the factor of reduction of the divergence, as a function of the electron energy and of the distance L between the accelerator and the lens. The peak electron density in the focusing stage is ∼3.9 × 1018 cm−3.

Discussion

We demonstrated the collimation of an electron beam by a laser-plasma lens. The electron beam was accelerated in a laser-plasma accelerator up to ≈300 MeV before going through a laser-plasma lens. At the lens exit, the beam divergence was reduced by a factor of 2 for the whole beam and a factor of 2.6 for its high-energy part. This factor was limited by the fast decrease of the laser intensity in the lens. Stronger collimation could be obtained by using a shorter gas jet for the acceleration stage, a gas jet with sharper gradients for the lens, or a more energetic laser pulse. Nevertheless, the demonstrated divergence reduction should already be sufficient to transport the electron beam with a quadrupole lens. For state of the art laser-plasma accelerators, the emittance growth should remain negligible over a propagation distance of ∼30 cm, which should be enough to transport the beam with compact quadrupoles19. Alternatively, the collimated electron beam could be send directly into an optical34 or a plasma undulator35 to form a millimetre scale, possibly coherent, synchrotron source.

Methods

Laser system

The experiment was conducted at Laboratoire d'Optique Appliquée with the ‘Salle Jaune' Ti:Sa laser system, which delivers 0.9 Joule in the focal spot with a FWHM pulse duration of 28 fs and a linear polarization. The laser pulse was focused at the entrance of the first gas jet with a 1-m focal length off-axis parabola to a FWHM focal spot size of 12 μm. From the measured intensity distribution in the focal plane, the peak intensity was estimated to be 1.8 × 1019 W cm−2. The Rayleigh length in vacuum is ∼400 μm. It is likely significantly shorter at the accelerator exit because of self-focusing.

Gas targetry

Helium gas jets were used for both the acceleration and the focusing stages. The two gas jets were produced by supersonic nozzles. The first has an exit diameter of 3 mm and a Mach number of 3, and the second has a diameter of 0.8 mm and a Mach number of 1.6. The laser was fired at 1.6 mm from the nozzle exits.The electron density profiles of both gas jets were characterized by interferometry and were analysed using the image processing programme Neutrino. The density profile in the acceleration stage had a plateau of 2.4±0.1 mm surrounded by 600±100 μm gradients. The peak electron density was ∼9.2±0.5 × 1018 cm−3. In the second gas jet, the density profile was triangular with 1±0.1 mm gradients (Supplementary Fig. 1). The distance between the two gas jets was measured at half-maximum.

Electron diagnostics

The electron divergence was measured, in the vertical direction, from electron spectra. The electron spectrometer consisted of a permanent bending magnet (1.1 T over 10 cm), which deflects electrons depending on their energy, and a Lanex phosphor screen, which converts a fraction of the electron energy into 546 nm light imaged by a 16-bit visible CCD camera. The energy resolution varies between 1% (for 140 MeV electrons with a beam divergence of 1.5 mrad) and 10% (for 300 MeV electrons with a beam divergence of 4 mrad). The angular resolution is ∼0.3 mrad. Two-dimensional footprints of the electron beam showed that the divergence is very similar in the horizontal and vertical directions. These footprints cannot be used to estimate the divergence reduction because of chromatic effects.

Author contributions

C.T. proposed the experiment and wrote the paper with help from E.G., A.D. and R.L. E.G., A.D., C.T., K.T.P. and J.G. performed the experiment. E.G. analysed the results. R.L. and A.L. provided a theoretical support. A.L. realized Figure 1. J.-P.G. and A.T. designed, built and operated the upgraded laser system of Salle Jaune. A.F., F.T., S.S. and A.R. provided support for the operation of the facility. V.M. supervised the project.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Thaury, C. et al. Demonstration of relativistic electron beam focusing by a laser-plasma lens. Nat. Commun. 6:6860 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7860 (2015).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figure 1

ncomms7860-s1.pdf (97.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the European Research Council through the ERC projects PARIS (contract no. 226424) and X-Five (contract no. 339128), and by the Agence Nationale pour la recherche through the project LUCEL-X (ANR-13-BS04-0011). A.D. acknowledges LA3NET, which is funded by the European Commission under grant agreement number GA-ITN-2011-289191. C.T. thanks A. Loulergues for fruitful discussions regarding the emittance growth in beam transport lines.

References

  1. Faure J. et al. A laser-plasma accelerator producing monoenergetic electron beams. Nature 431, 541–544 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Geddes C. G. R. et al. High-quality electron beams from a laser wakefield accelerator using plasma-channel guiding. Nature 431, 538–541 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mangles S. P. D. et al. Monoenergetic beams of relativistic electrons from intense laser-plasma interactions. Nature 431, 535–538 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brunetti E. et al. Low emittance, high brilliance relativistic electron beams from a laser-plasma accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 215007 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Plateau G. R. et al. Low-emittance electron bunches from a laser-plasma accelerator measured using single-shot x-ray spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 064802 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Weingartner R. et al. Ultralow emittance electron beams from a laser-wakefield accelerator. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 15, 111302 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  7. Thaury C. et al. Angular-Momentum Evolution in Laser-Plasma Accelerators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 135002 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Alesini D. et al. The SPARC project: a high-brightness electron beam source at LNF to drive a SASE-FEL experiment. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 507, 345–349 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  9. Löhl F. et al. Measurements of the transverse emittance at the flash injector at desy. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9, 092802 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  10. Corde S. et al. Controlled betatron x-ray radiation from tunable optically injected electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 255003 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rechatin C. et al. Controlling the phase-space volume of injected electrons in a laser-plasma accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 164801 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nakajima K. Compact x-ray sources: towards a table-top free-electron laser. Nat. Phys. 4, 92–93 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  13. Malka V. et al. Principles and applications of compact laser-plasma accelerators. Nat. Phys. 4, 447–453 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  14. Schroeder C. B., Esarey E., Geddes C. G. R., Benedetti C. & Leemans W. P. Physics considerations for laser-plasma linear colliders. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Accel. Beams 13, 101301 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  15. Nakajima K. et al. Operating plasma density issues on large-scale laser-plasma accelerators toward high-energy frontier. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 14, 091301 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  16. Floettmann K. Some basic features of the beam emittance. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Accel. Beams 6, 034202 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  17. Migliorati M. et al. Intrinsic normalized emittance growth in laser-driven electron accelerators. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Accel. Beams 16, 011302 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  18. Buck A. et al. Shock-front injector for high-quality laser-plasma acceleration. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 185006 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Becker S. et al. Characterization and tuning of ultrahigh gradient permanent magnet quadrupoles. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12, 102801 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen P. A possible final focusing mechanism for linear colliders. Part. Acceler. 20, 171–182 (1987). [Google Scholar]
  21. Tajima T. & Dawson J. M. Laser electron accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 267–270 (1979). [Google Scholar]
  22. Nakanishi H. et al. Direct observation of plasma-lens effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1870–1873 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hairapetian G. et al. Experimental demonstration of dynamic focusing of a relativistic electron bunch by an overdense plasma lens. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2403–2406 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hairapetian G. et al. Transverse dynamics of a short, relativistic electron bunch in a plasma lens. Phys. Plasmas 2, 2555–2561 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  25. Ng J. S. T. et al. Observation of plasma focusing of a 28.5 gev positron beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 244801 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Barov N., Conde M. E., Gai W. & Rosenzweig J. B. Propagation of short electron pulses in a plasma channel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 81–84 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  27. Rosenzweig J. B., Breizman B., Katsouleas T. & Su J. J. Acceleration and focusing of electrons in two-dimensional nonlinear plasma wake fields. Phys. Rev. A 44, R6189–R6192 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lehe R., Thaury C., Lifschitz A., Rax J.-M. & Malka V. Transverse dynamics of an intense electron bunch traveling through a pre-ionized plasma. Phys. Plasmas 21, (2014) http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/pop/21/4/10.1063/1.4870336. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lehe R., Thaury C., Guillaume E., Lifschitz A. & Malka V. Laser-plasma lens for laser-wakefield accelerators. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 17, 121301 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  30. Lehe R. Improvement of the quality of laser-wakefied accelerators: towards a compact free-electron laser. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique (2014) http://www.normalesup.org/lehe/Lehe_PhD_Manuscript.pdf.
  31. Esarey E., Schroeder C. B. & Leemans W. P. Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accelerators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1229–1285 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  32. Corde S. et al. Femtosecond x rays from laser-plasma accelerators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1–48 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  33. Corde S. et al. Observation of longitudinal and transverse self-injections in laser-plasma accelerators. Nat Commun. 4, 1501 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Andriyash I. A., d'Humières E., Tikhonchuk V. T. & Balcou P. X-ray amplification from a raman free-electron laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 244802 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Andriyash I. A. et al. An ultracompact x-ray source based on a laser-plasma undulator. Nat Commun. 5, 4736 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figure 1

ncomms7860-s1.pdf (97.1KB, pdf)

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES