Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Use Misuse. 2014 Feb 5;49(7):779–782. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2014.880177

The Frequency of Company-Sponsored Alcohol Brand-Related Sites on Facebook – 2012

Siphannay Nhean 1, Justin Nyborn 2, Danielle Hinchey 3, Heather Valerio 4, Kathryn Kinzel 5, Michael Siegel 6, David Jernigan 7
PMCID: PMC4410775  NIHMSID: NIHMS679897  PMID: 24499464

In an effort to gain a broader reach to consumers, many companies have begun advertising on popular social networking websites like Facebook. In 2011, Alexa, a web information company, reported that Facebook was the second most popular website visited on a global level.1 Moreover, Facebook also offers advertisers the ability to target specific groups based on demographic information provided by personal account holders.2 As the benefits of advertising on Facebook have become increasingly more lucrative, marketing experts have predicted that social media spending will increase from $2 billion in 2008 to $3.5 billion in 2013.3 In this study, we attempted to quantify for the first time the frequency of company-sponsored alcohol brand-related sites on Facebook.

We conducted a systematic Internet search for company-sponsored Facebook sites for 898 alcohol brands across 16 different alcoholic beverage types. This brand database was previously created for studies of brand-specific alcohol pricing and consumption among underage youth.4, 5 We conducted two searches for each of the 898 brands. First, we searched by the brand name only such as “Abita.” Second, we searched by the brand name with a descriptor such as “Abita Beer.” We recorded the first 150 entries using each search strategy, including only company-sponsored Facebook sites that promoted the brand directly, such as a Facebook group devoted to that brand, a site advertising or promoting the brand, a group formed around that brand, or an event featuring that brand.

Through our search we identified 1,017 company-sponsored, alcohol brand-related sites on Facebook of which the greatest number of company sites were for beer brands (230), followed by wine (211), and vodka (204) (Table 1). Brands with the most company sites were Smirnoff (52), Johnnie Walker (48), Absolut (36), and New Belgium (27) (Table 2). Our comprehensive database of results can be accessed at www.youthalcoholbrands.com/facebook.

Table 1.

Total Number of Facebook Company Sites by Alcoholic Beverage Type

Alcohol Type Alcohol Subtype Total Number of Company Sites
BEER Beer Total 230
ALCOPOPS FABa Total 21
SPIRITS AEDb 4
Bourbon 44
Brandy 4
Cognac 22
Gin 15
Rum 38
Scotch 80
Tequila 47
Vodka 204
Whiskey 27
Liqueurs 69
Grain alcohol 0
Total 554
 WINE Wine 211
Fortified winec 1
Total 212
OVERALL TOTAL 1,017
a

Flavored alcohol beverage

b

Alcoholic energy drinks

c

Low-end fortified wine

Table 2.

Twenty Alcohol Brands with the Most Company Facebook Sites

Company Brand Number of Company Facebook Sites
Diageo Smirnoff 52
Diageo Johnnie Walker 48
Pernod Ricard Absolut 36
New Belgium Brewing Company New Belgium 27
Beam Inc. Jim Beam 23
Russian Standard Russian Standard 20
Grupo Modelo Corona 15
Diageo Guinness 15
Brown-Forman Finlandia 15
Diageo Baileys 14
Anheuser-Busch Stella Artois 13
Bacardi Limited Bacardi 13
Diageo Jose Cuervo 12
Proximo Spirits Three Olives 12
Anheuser-Busch Bud Light 10
Jas Hennessy & Co. Hennessy 10
Rémy Cointreau Remy Martin 10
Campari Group Skyy 10
Diageo Bushmills 10
LVMH Belvedere 9

Alcohol companies readily admit that brand-specific Facebook sites are critical in promoting sales of those brands.6, 7 New Belgium estimated that its Facebook fans are responsible for $50.7 million in annual sales, or half of its overall sales.6 Diageo reported that Facebook ads and promotions for Smirnoff and Baileys increased sales of these brands by 20%.7 In an article in Advertising Age, Diageo chief marketing officer Andy Fennell emphasized the importance of Facebook to Diageo’s marketing: “Facebook is now just a central part of all of our campaigns. … We’ve got 20 million fans on Facebook, so we’ve done the scale thing, and funnily enough, when you get to 20 million, the next 5 million are dead easy, because it just snowballs.”8

In 2011, Facebook struck a multi-million dollar deal with Diageo to “share skills and pool resources to figure out new ways to harness the chatter among Facebook’s 750m users.” 7 Diageo apparently sent 950 of its marketers to “Facebook boot camps” to “build their social media capabilities” and expected to obtain “significant returns on investment.”9 Our research documents the success of this strategy, as Diageo brands are among the top in total number of company-related, brand-specific alcohol sites. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is presently investigating alcohol marketing using digital media and has requested detailed information from alcohol companies on their use of social media sites such as Facebook™.10

We believe results from our study help to inform the FTC’s investigation and can serve as a foundation for further research, such as investigating whether the most prevalent brands on Facebook are also the brands most preferred by underage drinkers.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Table

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism grant R01 AA020309-01.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: All authors on this manuscript declare no conflicts of interest.

Contributor Information

Siphannay Nhean, Community Health Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health

Justin Nyborn, Community Health Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health

Danielle Hinchey, Community Health Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health

Heather Valerio, Community Health Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health

Kathryn Kinzel, Community Health Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health

Michael Siegel, Community Health Sciences Department, Boston University School of Public Health

David Jernigan, Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Table

RESOURCES