Abstract
Background
We hypothesized that transcutaneous gas determinations of O2 and CO2 (TcPO2 and TcPCO2) are associated with the severity of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH).
Methods
In this cross-sectional study we included consecutive patients with PAH (group 1 pulmonary hypertension (PH)) (n=34). Transcutaneous gas determinations were compared to those of age- and gender-matched healthy controls (n=14), non-group 1 PH (n=19) or patients with high estimated right ventricular systolic pressure on echocardiography but without hemodynamic evidence of PH (n=12).
Results
In patients with PAH, TcPO2 and TcPCO2 were significantly associated with PaO2 (R= 0.44, p=0.03) and PaCO2 (R=0.77, p<0.001), respectively. TcPO2/FiO2 (mean difference: −65.0 [95% CI: −121.3–8.7]) and TcPCO2 (mean difference: −7.4 [95% CI: −11.6–3.1]) were significantly lower in patients with PAH than healthy controls. TcPCO2 was useful in discriminating PAH patients from other individuals (AUC: 0.74 (95% CI of 0.62–0.83)). TcPO2/FiO2 ratio was significantly associated with mean PAP, TPG, PVR, CI, SVI, DLCO, 6-min walk distance and components of the CAMPHOR questionnaire.
Conclusions
Transcutaneous pressure of CO2 was lower in patients with PAH. Transcutaneous pressure of O2 over inspired fraction of O2 ratio was inversely associated with severity of disease in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
Keywords: Pulmonary arterial hypertension, arterial blood gases, oxygen, carbon dioxide, transcutaneous oxygenation, microcirculation, vascular function
Introduction
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) is a pulmonary vascular disease that despite remarkable therapeutic advances in the last two decades, continues to be responsible for right ventricle failure and premature death [28]. There is a pressing need to identify methods that allow a comprehensive non-invasive assessment of this life-threatening condition.
Previous guidelines included arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis as part of the evaluation of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) [10,17]. This was in part supported by a retrospective study that identified lower partial pressure of carbon dioxide (CO2) (measured in arterialized capillary blood obtained from hyperemic earlobes) as an independent predictor of mortality in patients with idiopathic PAH [13]. The recently published, Fifth World Symposium on PH still suggests considering ABG analysis in the diagnostic work-up of patients with PH [12].
Arterial blood gas analysis is not routinely done in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with PAH, mostly due to its invasive nature. In order to avoid the arterial puncture, several authors have proposed the measurement of blood gases in arterialized capillary blood (hyperemic earlobes) or the determination of CO2 at the end of expiration (EtCO2); nevertheless, these methodologies have limitations [5,18,22,25]. An alternative non-invasive approach is the measurement of the transcutaneous PO2 and PCO2 (TcPO2 and TcPCO2, respectively) by a locally applied skin electrode that reflected the amount of O2 and CO2 that diffuses from the capillaries through the skin into the sensors. Transcutaneous gas determinations are affected by respiratory or circulatory conditions that influence the delivery of O2 or extraction of CO2 [20]. TcPO2 provides a direct and quantitative assessment of the O2 availability to the tissues and is commonly used in medical decision making in wound care and hyperbaric medicine [20].
We hypothesized that transcutaneous gas determinations would approximate the values obtained with ABG analysis and that these non-invasive measurements are associated with the severity of PAH. Therefore, in the present study we tested how transcutaneous gas measurements (TcPO2 and TcPCO2) compare to ABG analysis and their association with functional, laboratory, echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters in patients who underwent RHC at our institution. Our cohort of interest was patients with PAH (5th World Symposium group 1 PH) [26]. Given the difficulties in finding a valid comparator, we studied 3 other groups of subjects: non-group 1 PH [26], patients without PH on RHC who were studied because of a high right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) on echocardiogram and age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Preliminary results of this study have been previously reported in the form of an abstract [3].
Methods
a) Subjects and study design
The research protocol was approved by the Cleveland Clinic Institutional Review Board (study # 11-441) and all subjects provided written informed consent. We conducted this cross-sectional study between December 2011 and December 2013. We included consecutive patients that met hemodynamic criteria for PAH (defined as mean PAP ≥ 25 mm Hg, PAWP ≤ 15 mm Hg and PVR > 3 Wood Units) [12]. In addition, we studied patients with non-group 1 PH [26] and patients that underwent a RHC due to a high RVSP on echocardiogram and were subsequently found to have a mean PAP < 25 mmHg. A detailed clinical evaluation was performed in all patients to determine the etiology of PH [12]. In addition, we tested age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Healthy controls did not have ABG analysis, echocardiograms or RHC.
Patients underwent RHC in the outpatient setting using local anesthesia (lidocaine 2%) and cannulating preferably the right internal jugular vein. No intravenous sedation or analgesia was given to any patient before, during or after the procedure. Patients did not eat or drink for 8 hours prior to testing. We continued or started O2 supplementation in patients on chronic O2 therapy or in whom the pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) was below 90%, respectively. In the event that O2 supplementation was provided to the patients, we maintained the same O2 flow during all the study measurements. The procedure room had stable temperature (72° F or 22° C) during all the interventions.
During the RHC, we obtained mixed venous O2 from the pulmonary artery. Immediately after the RHC, we obtained radial ABG and determined forearm TcPO2 and TcPCO2. Furthermore, we measured the EtCO2 and partial pressure of expired CO2 (PeCO2) and calculated the alveolar dead space (Figure 1). Given that the metabolic cart determinations were incorporated after the initiation of the study, EtCO2 and PeCO2 were measured in only 29 patients who underwent RHC. Meanwhile, ABGs were not done in 5 patients (2 patients declined the procedure and in 3 patients the procedure was aborted given that arterial blood was not obtained after 2 attempts).
Figure 1. Measurements performed.
Upper panel: To the left of the subject we observed the CCM Express indirect calorimeter (MGC diagnostics, Saint Paul, Minnesota) and the PeriFlux system 5000 (Perimed, Järfälla, Sweden). To the right of the subject we can see the transcutaneous electrode (E5280) in the anterior aspect of the right forearm and an arterial blood collection kit. Lower panel: TcPO2 and TcPCO2 measurements. The arrows point to the recorded values for this particular patient.
b) ABG analysis, PeCO2 and EtCO2 determinations
Brachial, radial and ulnar pulses were of good quality and none of the patients had known peripheral vascular disease. Arterial blood was obtained from the radial artery and analyzed in the ABL 800 Flex analyzer (Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark). This instrument uses 128 wavelengths for full CO-oximetry which allowed the precise measurement of the relative blood concentrations of oxyhemoglobin (SaO2).
EtCO2, PeCO2 and tidal volume (Vt) were determined using the CCM Express indirect calorimeter (MGC diagnostics, Saint Paul, Minnesota). During the course of 15 minutes, the EtCO2 and PeCO2 were determined breath by breath and the 30-second means were averaged. We calculated the physiological dead space (Vd): (PaCO2−PeCO2)/PaCO2* Vt - face mask dead space [2,6,27].
c) TcPO2 and TcPCO2 determinations
We used the PeriFlux system 5000 (Perimed, Järfälla, Sweden) that included the PF 5040 TcPO2/TcPCO2 unit and the E5280 electrode. This electrode is covered with a thin membrane that stabilizes the conditions and is permeable to O2 and CO2. Per manufacture’s protocol, the electrode warms the underlying tissue (45°C) to achieve greater skin gas diffusion. TcPO2 is determined by direct polarography, based on an electro-chemical process that involves a platinum cathode (sensor electrode) and a silver anode (reference electrode). The reduction of O2 at the cathode generates a current which is later converted into voltage and digitalized. TcPCO2 is electrochemically calculated by a change in PH of an electrolyte solution [20].
For transcutaneous gas determinations, patients were in a sitting position with the right forearm at the level of the heart (Figure 1). The membrane of the E5280 transcutaneous electrode was changed weekly following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The transcutaneous electrode was calibrated before each measurement. The electrode was applied in the anterior aspect of the right forearm away from blood vessels and 5 cm distal to the antecubital fossa. We chose the forearm because this site is easily accessible and commonly used for studies of microvascular function.
The skin of the forearm was prepared by applying a clean adhesive tape that removes part of the stratum corneum. After wiping the area with alcohol, a TC 550 fixation ring was applied to the skin and 3 to 5 drops of contact liquid (TC 560) we instilled before mounting the electrode. The TcPO2 and TcPCO2 measurements were obtained by two operators (L.A., F.C.) immediately after the RHC. Transcutaneous gas readings were recorded and analyzed off-line. We measured TcPO2 and TcPCO2 after at least 20 minutes of the application of the electrode and once values stabilized. Operators were blinded to the hemodynamic determinations or severity of the clinical condition.
d) Functional, echocardiographic and hemodynamic measurements
We determined the severity of PAH by using NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional class, plasma NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) concentration, diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) by single-breath technique [15], distance walked in the 6-minute [1] and right ventricular (RV) size and function on echocardiography [23]. RV function was determined by the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE); meanwhile, RV size was measured in the apical four-chamber view by the RV basal, middle cavity and longitudinal dimensions [23]. We assessed quality of life with the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR) questionnaire [16]. We measured and calculated the following hemodynamic parameters during RHC: right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), transpulmonary gradient (TPG: mean PAP - PAWP), diastolic pulmonary gradient (DPG: diastolic PAP – PAWP), cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI) and pulmonary artery vascular resistance (PVR).
Statistical analysis
Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and categorical data are summarized as discrete values and percentages (n (%)). Independent continuous samples were compared using Kruskal Wallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks and the post hoc Games-Howell test for pairwise comparison. Categorical variables were compared with Fisher’s exact test. Relationships between parameters were tested using the Pearson correlation test. Agreement was tested with Bland-Altman plot and expressed as mean difference and limit of agreement (LOA). Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and values provided as area under the curve (AUC) with their respective 95% confidence interval. Given that some patients were on O2 supplementation, we performed the TcPO2 analyses on the entire cohort using the calculated TcPO2/FiO2 ratio and additionally only in the subgroup of patients not on O2 therapy. All p values are two-tailed and a value of < 0.05 was considered significant. The statistical analyses were performed using the statistical package IBM SPSS, version 20 (IBM; Armonk, New York) and MedCalc, version 13 (Ostend, Belgium).
Results
a) Patient characteristics
We included 34 patients with group 1 PAH (idiopathic or heritable: 18 (53%), connective tissue disease associated: 7 (21%), porto-pulmonary hypertension: 6 (18%), congenital heart disease: 2 (6%) and due to human immunodeficiency virus: 1 (3%)). Of the patients with PAH, 24 (71%) were receiving PH-specific treatment (only oral treatment: 15 (63%), parenteral or inhaled prostacyclin analogues: 9 (37%)).
We also included, 14 patients with non-group 1 PH (5th World Symposium groups II: 5 (36%), III: 3 (21%), IV: 4 (29%), and V: 2 (14%)), 11 patients with elevated right ventricular systolic pressure (> 40 mm Hg) on echocardiogram but no PH on RHC, and 14 healthy controls. The clinical, functional, echocardiographic and hemodynamic characteristics of the study subjects are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the study subjects:
| PAH (Group 1 PH) Mean ±SD, median (range) or n (%) |
Non-group 1 PH Mean ±SD, median (range) or n (%) |
No PH on RHC Mean ±SD, median (range) or n (%) |
Healthy controls Mean ±SD or n (%) |
P (Kruskal Wallis/Fisher’s exact test) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 34 | 14 | 11 | 14 | |
| Age (years) | 54 ±13 | 58 ±13 | 56 ±17 | 51 ±11 | 0.59 |
| Female gender | 27 (79) | 8 (57) | 5 (46) | 11 (79) | 0.12 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 29.4 ±6 | 32.1 ±7 | 28.8 ±13 | - | 0.60 |
| Patients on O2 supplementation# | 9 (27) | 3 (21) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.04 |
| 6-min walk distance (% of predicted)[7] | 64 ±21 | 58 ±18 | 72 ±22 | - | 0.40 |
| NT-pro BNP (pg/mL) | 1888 ±2053 | 1753 ±2162 | 96 ±50 | - | 0.01 |
| DLCO (% of predicted) | 59 ±21 | 54 ±23 | 70 ±18 | - | 0.30 |
| CAMPHOR (symptoms) | 12.7 ±6 | 9.9 ±7 | 3.8 ±3 | - | 0.03 |
| CAMPHOR (activity) | 11.7 ±7 | 7 ±4 | 3.8 ±4 | - | 0.03 |
| CAMPHOR (QOL) | 9.7 ±7 | 7 ±7 | 3.2 ±3 | - | 0.12 |
| TAPSE (cm) | 1.8 ±0.6 | 1.8 ±0.8 | 2.11 ±0.4 | - | 0.27 |
| Basal RV diameter (cm) | 4.3 ±0.7 | 4.5 ±0.6 | 4.7 ±0.8 | - | 0.32 |
| Mid RV diameter (cm) | 4.0 ±1.1 | 4.0 ±0.8 | 3.6 ±1.0 | - | 0.70 |
| Longitudinal RV diameter (cm) | 6.8 ±1.1 | 7.0 ± 1.2 | 7.0 ±1.4 | - | 0.54 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 77 ±11 | 79 ±20 | 70 ±17 | - | 0.19 |
| Systolic ABP (mmHg) | 121 ±29 | 138 ±25 | 127 ±18 | - | 0.10 |
| RA pressure (mmHg) | 8 ±5 | 11 ±8 | 6 ±3 | - | 0.04 |
| Mean PAP (mmHg) | 46 (25.0–73.0) | 38.5 (25.0–60.0) | 20.0 (18.0–23.3) | - | <0.001 |
| PAWP (mmHg) | 11 ±6 | 15 ±6 | 12 ±3 | - | 0.03 |
| CI (L/min/m2) | 3.0 ±1.2 | 3.0 ±0.7 | 2.9 ±0.7 | - | 0.87 |
| SVI (ml/m2) | 41 ±15 | 39 ±10 | 43 ±8 | - | 0.58 |
| PVR (Wood units) | 7.5 (3–16) | 4.0 (0.1–8) | 1.7 (1–7) | - | <0.001 |
| Mixed venous O2 (%)* | 68 ±8 | 66 ±10 | 69 ±7 | - | 0.69 |
| Lactic acid in arterial blood (mmol/L) | 1.0 ±0.4 | 1.0 ±0.5 | 1.0 ±0.3 | 0.41 |
Abbreviations: ABP: arterial blood pressure, BMI: body mass index, CI: cardiac index, DLCO: diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide, FiO2: fraction of inspired O2, NT-pro BNP: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, PAH: pulmonary arterial hypertension, PAWP: pulmonary artery wedge pressure, PAP: pulmonary artery pressure, PH: pulmonary hypertension, PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance, QOL: quality of life, RA: right atrial, RV: right ventricle, SD: standard deviation, SVI: stroke volume index, TAPSE: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.
on patients not on oxygen supplementation.
in patients on O2 supplementation the flow (L/min) was 3.6 ±1 and 4.0 ±1 for PAH and non-group 1 PH patients, respectively.
Measurements of transcutaneous gases, ABGs and EtCO2 are presented in Table 2 for the entire cohort and for those patients not on O2 supplementation. In the entire cohort of patients TcPO2/FiO2 (mean difference: −65.0 [95% CI: −121.3–8.7]) and TcPCO2 (mean difference: −7.4 [95% CI: −11.6–3.1]) were significantly lower in patients with PAH than healthy controls. Interestingly TcPCO2 was significantly lower in patients with PAH compared to other PH groups (mean difference: −7.1 [95% CI: −14.0–0.2]). Treatment for PAH did not significantly affected any of the O2 or CO2 measurements (data not shown).
Table 2.
Comparison of ABGs, transcutaneous and EtCO2 in the study subjects.
| PAH (Group 1 PH) Mean ±SD or n (%) |
Non-group 1 PH Mean ±SD or n (%) |
No PH on RHC Mean ±SD or n (%) |
Healthy controls Mean ±SD or n (%) |
P (Kruskal-Wallis/Fisher’s exact test) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measurements on all patients | |||||
| n | 34 | 14 | 11 | 14 | |
| TcPO2/FiO2 ratio (mmHg) | 338 ±69 | 324 ±69 | 393 ±59 | 403 ±58 | 0.005 |
| PaO2/FiO2 ratio (mmHg) | 342 ±81 | 328 ±99 | 375 ±47 | - | 0.40 |
| TcPCO2 (mmHg) | 31.6 ±7 | 37.8 ±7 | 33.4 ±10 | 38.9 ±3 | 0.001 |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | 33 ±5 | 40.7 ±5 | 42 ±4 | - | <0.001 |
| PaCO2 - TcPCO2 (mmHg) | 1.9 ±4.9 | 3.1 ±3.9 | 5.1 ±9.3 | - | 0.58 |
| EtCO2 (mmHg) | 27.7 ± 3.6 | 31.3 ±6 | 30.4 ±5.5 | - | 0.07 |
| Vd (mL) | 175 ±110 | 127 ±88 | 154 ±126 | - | 0.58 |
| Vd/Vt (%) | 25 ±9 | 25 ±11 | 29 ±18 | - | 0.97 |
| Measurements only in patients not on O2 supplementation | |||||
| Patients not on O2 supplementation# | 9 (27) | 3 (21) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0.04 |
| TcPO2 (mmHg) | 76 ±11 | 74 ±8 | 82 ±12 | 85 ±12 | 0.049 |
| PaO2 (mmHg) | 78 ±11 | 77 ±14 | 79 ±10 | - | 0.84 |
| PaO2 - TcPO2 (mmHg) | 1.0 ± 11.3 | 3.4 ±8.4 | −3.7 ±8.4 | - | 0.27 |
| TcPCO2 (mmHg) | 30 ±5 | 37 ±7 | 33 ±10 | 39 ±3 | <0.001 |
| PaCO2 (mmHg) | 32 ±4 | 42 ±4 | 39 ±5 | - | <0.001 |
| PaCO2 - TcPCO2 (mmHg) | 3.0 ±3.1 | 3.6 ±3.7 | 5.1 ±9.3 | - | 0.92 |
| EtCO2 (mmHg) | 28 ±4 | 31 ±6 | 30 ±6 | - | 0.08 |
Abbreviations: CO2: carbon dioxide, EtCO2: end-tidal carbon dioxide, FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen, O2: oxygen, PaCO2: partial pressure of CO2 in arterial blood, PaO2: partial pressure of O2 in arterial blood, TcPCO2, transcutaneous carbon dioxide, TcPO2, transcutaneous oxygen, Vd: physiological dead space, Vt: tidal volume.
b) Difference and agreement between transcutaneous gases and ABGs
Using Bland-Altman analysis the mean difference between TcPO2 and PaO2 was −2 mmHg with wide 95% LOA (25 mmHg to −29 mmHg). In patients not on O2 supplementation the Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference between TcPO2 and PaO2 of −0.2 mmHg with 95% LOA of 19.4 mmHg to −19.7 mmHg. In patients that underwent RHC the same analysis revealed a mean difference between TcPCO2 and PaCO2 of −3.1 mmHg with 95% LOA of 8.8 mmHg to −15 mmHg.
c) Associations between TcPO2/FiO2 ratio and TcPCO2 versus functional, laboratory, echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters in PAH patients
In the entire cohort of PAH patients TcPO2/FiO2 ratio was significantly associated with TPG, PVR, CI and SVI as well as the activities and QOL components of the CAMPHOR questionnaire and DLCO (Table 3). When only considering the PAH patients not on O2 supplementation, TcPO2 was inversely associated with TPG and the activities and QOL components of the CAMPHOR questionnaire. TcPCO2 was indirectly associated with TPG and the activities and QOL components of the CAMPHOR questionnaire; meanwhile other associations did not reach statistical significance.
Table 3.
Correlation table in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
| TcPO2/FiO2 | TcPO2 * | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | p | R | p | |
| Cardiac output # | 0.37 | 0.04 | ||
| Cardiac index # | 0.36 | 0.049 | ||
| TPG | −0.36 | 0.05 | −0.42 | 0.04 |
| PVR | −0.39 | 0.03 | ||
| SVI | 0.46 | 0.01 | ||
| CAMPHOR (activities) | −0.73 | 0.001 | −0.76 | 0.006 |
| CAMPHOR (QOL) | −0.54 | 0.03 | −0.60 | 0.049 |
| DLCO (% of predicted) | 0.58 | 0.005 | ||
Only significant associations are shown.
Only in patients not on O2 supplementation.
measured by thermodilution.
Abbreviations: CI: cardiac index, DLCO: diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide, PAP: pulmonary artery pressure, PVR: pulmonary vascular resistance, QOL: quality of life, R: Pearson correlation coefficient, SVI: stroke volume index and TPG: transpulmonary gradient.
d) TcPCO2 as a predictor of PAH and TcPO2/FiO2 ratio as a predictor of severity of disease in PAH
We used ROC test to assess whether TcPCO2 could help differentiate patients with PAH from individuals with non-group 1 PH and those with normal pulmonary pressure in RHC. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.74 (95% CI of 0.62–0.83) and a TcPCO2 cut-off of ≤ 34.4 mmHg had a sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 74%, respectively to predict PAH, with a positive likelihood ratio of 2.99 (95% CI: 1.7–5.2). Meanwhile, a TcPCO2 cut-off of ≤ 32.2 mmHg had a sensitivity and specificity of 64% and 84%, respectively, with a positive likelihood ratio of 4.0 (95% CI: 1.9–8.8) (Figure 2, Panel A).
Figure 2. ROC curves for TcPCO2 and TcPO2/FiO2.
Panel A shows the ROC curve of TcPCO2 for discriminating patients with PAH from the cohort of subjects that underwent RHC. Panel B depicts that ROC curve of TcPO2/FiO2 for discriminating patients with a PVR above the median (≥ 7.5 Wood Units).
We tested whether TcPO2/FiO2 could help identify PAH patients who were not on supplemental O2 and had more severe hemodynamic profile defined as a PVR below or above the median. The AUC was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.52–0.86) and a cut-off value of ≤ 274 mmHg had a sensitivity of 46% and specificity of 100% to discriminate between patient with PVR ≥ 7.5 Wood Units (Figure 2, Panel B).
Discussion
Since the publication of the National Institute of Health (NIH) national registry it is known that PAH is associated with mild to moderate hypoxemia and hypocapnia [21]. Limited information is available to determine the degree in which this ABG pattern reflects disease severity and how it relates to non-invasive determinations. For the first time, we have tested transcutaneous gas measurements in patients with PH and compared them with arterial gas determinations as well as several other important clinical parameters. Overall, we found that O2 and CO2 transcutaneous gas determinations are of value in PAH since a lower TcPO2/FiO2 ratio was associated with severity of disease and TcPCO2 may help with the identification of PAH patients.
Transcutaneous monitoring has no absolute contraindications and it is non-invasive. A decrease in the peripheral perfusion or capillary density may result in a decrease in TcPO2 and TcPCO2; hence these measurements can be used to determine the adequacy of tissue perfusion [9,20]. We tested this noninvasive methodology in patients with PAH, a condition that with time leads to decrease cardiac output and poor peripheral perfusion. In addition, there is mounting evidence that PAH is not only a disease limited to pulmonary vasculature but also affects the systemic microcirculation [4,14]. Hofstee et al. found that a reduction in nailfold capillary density was associated with PAH severity in patients with systemic sclerosis or idiopathic PAH[14]. Further investigations are needed to determine whether the lower TcPO2/FiO2 ratio noted in our study is a reflection of a decrease cutaneous capillary density, particularly in patients with more severe PAH.
As noted by previous investigations, transcutaneous gas determinations showed a very good association between TcPCO2 and PaCO2 [11,24] and a weaker association between TcPO2 and PaO2. Hence, TcPCO2 could adequately estimate PaCO2 in clinical practice; however, given the large limits of agreement between the measurements the same does not hold true for TcPO2 and PaO2.
A retrospective analysis by Hoeper et al. showed that a lower PCO2 in arterialized capillary blood gases was a strong and independent predictor of survival in patients with idiopathic PAH [13]. In addition, lower EtCO2 values have been reported in PAH [29,30]. These findings are likely due to ventilatory inefficiency in PAH which is attributable to an increase in dead space fraction and sensitivity of chemoreceptors together with a decrease in cardiac output [8,13,19]. In our study, TcPCO2 does not appear to be related to variables that predict prognosis in PAH. Nevertheless, we found that TcPCO2 was lower in PAH patients than in other groups of patients. In support of our findings, prior investigations showed a lower PaCO2 in PAH patients [13].
Hoeper et al. showed an inverse association between arterialized capillary PO2 and RA pressure but no association with mean PAP or PVR [13]. Our study found a significant association between the ratio of TcPO2/FiO2 and several parameters that track with disease severity. In PAH patients not on supplemental O2, TcPO2 was associated with TPG and CAMPHOR questionnaire scores. Some associations between parameters of disease severity and TcO2 were noted only for TcPO2/FiO2 and not for TcPO2, potentially due to the smaller sample size when PAH patient on supplemental O2 are excluded.
There are limitations in this exploratory analysis that tested invasive and non-invasive methodologies that measure O2 and CO2 tension at different levels in patients that underwent RHC due to the suspicion of PH. Firstly, our sample size is relatively small; however PAH is a rare disease and despite working in a large academic center it took us 2 years to collect data on the patients presented in this study. Secondly, for a variety of reasons not all gas measurements were performed in all patients. Thirdly, we did not obtain arterialized capillary blood and healthy controls did not have an echocardiogram or blood work as part of the study. The strengths of this investigation are that ABG and novel gas measurements were performed immediately after the right heart catheterization which is the gold standard for diagnosing the disease and a critical tool for assessing severity of disease.
Conclusions
A lower transcutaneous pressure of CO2 suggested the presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension. In patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, a lower ratio of transcutaneous pressure of O2 over the inspired fraction of O2 was associated with a worse pulmonary hemodynamic profile.
Acknowledgments
Funding sources: This publication was made possible by CTSA KL2 [Grant # TR000440] (A.R.T.) from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, and by the NIH grants HL081064, HL107147 and RR026231 (R.A.D).
We would like to recognize invaluable help provided by the G62 procedure room nurses.
Abbreviations
- ABG
arterial blood gas
- CAMPHOR
Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review
- CO2
carbon dioxide
- EtCO2
end-tidal carbon dioxide
- FiO2
fraction of inspired oxygen
- NT-pro BNP
NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide
- NYHA
New York Heart Association
- O2
oxygen
- PAH
pulmonary arterial hypertension
- PaCO2
partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood
- PAWP
pulmonary artery wedge pressure
- PaO2
partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood
- PAP
pulmonary artery pressure
- PeCO2
partial pressure of expired CO2
- PH
pulmonary hypertension
- PVR
pulmonary artery vascular resistance
- RHC
right heart catheterization
- RV
right ventricle
- SpO2
pulse oxygen saturation
- TAPSE
tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion
- TcPCO2
transcutaneous partial pressure of carbon dioxide
- TcPO2
transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen
- TPG
transpulmonary gradient
- Vd
physiological dead space
- Vt
tidal volume
Footnotes
Contributions of authors:
Adriano R. Tonelli MD: Participated in the conception and design of the study, data collection, statistical analysis, interpretation of the results, writing and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and final approval of the manuscript submitted. Dr Tonelli is the guarantor of the paper, taking responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, from inception to published article.
Laith Alkukhun MD: Participated in the data collection, interpretation of the results and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and final approval of the manuscript submitted.
Frank Cikach: Participated in the data collection, interpretation of the results and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and final approval of the manuscript submitted.
Mostafa Ahmed MD: Participated in the interpretation of the results and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and final approval of the manuscript submitted.
Raed A. Dweik MD: Participated in the interpretation of the results, writing and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and final approval of the manuscript submitted.
Conflict of interest statements:
Adriano R. Tonelli MD: The author has no significant conflicts of interest with any companies or organization whose products or services may be discussed in this article.
Laith Alkukhun MD: The author has no significant conflicts of interest with any companies or organization whose products or services may be discussed in this article.
Frank Cikach: The author has no significant conflicts of interest with any companies or organization whose products or services may be discussed in this article.
Mostafa Ahmed MD: The author has no significant conflicts of interest with any companies or organization whose products or services may be discussed in this article.
Raed A. Dweik MD: The author has no significant conflicts of interest with any companies or organization whose products or services may be discussed in this article.
Contributor Information
Adriano R. Tonelli, Email: tonella@ccf.org, Staff, Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine. Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Laith Alkukhun, Email: alkukhl@ccf.org, Research Fellow, Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine. Respiratory Institute, OH, USA.
Frank Cikach, Email: Cikachf@ccf.org, Medical Student, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mostafa Ahmed, Email: Ahmedm2@ccf.org, Research Fellow, Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine. Respiratory Institute, OH, USA. Assistant Lecturer, Department of Chest Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Raed A. Dweik, Email: dweikr@ccf.org, Director of Pulmonary Vascular Diseases Program, Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine. Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
References
- 1.ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:111–117. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bohr C. Ueber die Lungenathmung. Skand Arch Physiol. 1891;2:236–268. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cikach F, Dweik RA, Tonelli AR. Arterial And Transcutaneous Gases In Pulmonary Hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:A4691. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dababneh L, Cikach F, Alkukhun L, Dweik RA, Tonelli AR. Sublingual microcirculation in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11:504–512. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201308-277OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eaton T, Rudkin S, Garrett JE. The clinical utility of arterialized earlobe capillary blood in the assessment of patients for long-term oxygen therapy. Respir Med. 2001;95:655–660. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Enghoff H. Volumen inefficax, Bemerkungen zur Frage des schadlichen Raumes. Upsala Lakareforen Forh. 1938;44:191–218. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Enright PL, Sherrill DL. Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:1384–1387. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9710086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fanfulla F, Mortara A, Maestri R, Pinna GD, Bruschi C, Cobelli F, Rampulla C. The development of hyperventilation in patients with chronic heart failure and Cheyne-Strokes respiration: a possible role of chronic hypoxia. Chest. 1998;114:1083–1090. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.4.1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Franzeck UK, Bollinger A, Huch R, Huch A. Transcutaneous oxygen tension and capillary morphologic characteristics and density in patients with chronic venous incompetence. Circulation. 1984;70:806–811. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.70.5.806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Galie N, Hoeper MM, Humbert M, Torbicki A, Vachiery JL, Barbera JA, Beghetti M, Corris P, Gaine S, Gibbs JS, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Jondeau G, Klepetko W, Opitz C, Peacock A, Rubin L, Zellweger M, Simonneau G. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2009;34:1219–1263. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00139009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gancel PE, Roupie E, Guittet L, Laplume S, Terzi N. Accuracy of a transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure monitoring device in emergency room patients with acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:348–351. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2076-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hoeper MM, Bogaard HJ, Condliffe R, Frantz R, Khanna D, Kurzyna M, Langleben D, Manes A, Satoh T, Torres F, Wilkins MR, Badesch DB. Definitions and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:D42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hoeper MM, Pletz MW, Golpon H, Welte T. Prognostic value of blood gas analyses in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2007;29:944–950. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00134506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hofstee HM, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Voskuyl AE, Dijkmans BA, Postmus PE, Smulders YM, Serne EH. Nailfold capillary density is associated with the presence and severity of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:191–195. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.087353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Macintyre N, Crapo RO, Viegi G, Johnson DC, van der Grinten CP, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Enright P, Gustafsson P, Hankinson J, Jensen R, McKay R, Miller MR, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Pellegrino R, Wanger J. Standardisation of the single-breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:720–735. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.McKenna SP, Doughty N, Meads DM, Doward LC, Pepke-Zaba J. The Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review (CAMPHOR): a measure of health-related quality of life and quality of life for patients with pulmonary hypertension. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:103–115. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-3513-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.McLaughlin VV, Archer SL, Badesch DB, Barst RJ, Farber HW, Lindner JR, Mathier MA, McGoon MD, Park MH, Rosenson RS, Rubin LJ, Tapson VF, Varga J. ACCF/AHA 2009 expert consensus document on pulmonary hypertension a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians; American Thoracic Society, Inc.; and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573–1619. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mollard P, Bourdillon N, Letournel M, Herman H, Gibert S, Pichon A, Woorons X, Richalet JP. Validity of arterialized earlobe blood gases at rest and exercise in normoxia and hypoxia. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2010;172:179–183. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2010.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Naeije R, van de Borne P. Clinical relevance of autonomic nervous system disturbances in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Eur Respir J. 2009;34:792–794. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00091609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Restrepo RD, Hirst KR, Wittnebel L, Wettstein R. AARC clinical practice guideline: transcutaneous monitoring of carbon dioxide and oxygen: 2012. Respiratory care. 2012;57:1955–1962. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rich S, Dantzker DR, Ayres SM, Bergofsky EH, Brundage BH, Detre KM, Fishman AP, Goldring RM, Groves BM, Koerner SK, et al. Primary pulmonary hypertension. A national prospective study. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:216–223. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-2-216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rodriguez P, Lellouche F, Aboab J, Buisson CB, Brochard L. Transcutaneous arterial carbon dioxide pressure monitoring in critically ill adult patients. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:309–312. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-0006-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD, Chandrasekaran K, Solomon SD, Louie EK, Schiller NB. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:685–713. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.05.010. quiz 786-688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sarrazin F, Tessler MJ, Kardash K, McNamara E, Holcroft C. Blood gas measurements using the Bayer Rapid Point 405: are we basing our decisions on accurate data? J Clin Monit Comput. 2007;21:253–256. doi: 10.1007/s10877-007-9082-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sauty A, Uldry C, Debetaz LF, Leuenberger P, Fitting JW. Differences in PO2 and PCO2 between arterial and arterialized earlobe samples. Eur Respir J. 1996;9:186–189. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09020186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Simonneau G, Gatzoulis MA, Adatia I, Celermajer D, Denton C, Ghofrani A, Gomez Sanchez MA, Krishna Kumar R, Landzberg M, Machado RF, Olschewski H, Robbins IM, Souza R. Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:D34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tang Y, Turner MJ, Baker AB. Effects of alveolar dead-space, shunt and V/Q distribution on respiratory dead-space measurements. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:538–548. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tonelli AR, Arelli V, Minai OA, Newman J, Bair N, Heresi GA, Dweik RA. Causes and circumstances of death in pulmonary arterial hypertension. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 2013;188:365–369. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201209-1640OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wensel R, Opitz CF, Anker SD, Winkler J, Hoffken G, Kleber FX, Sharma R, Hummel M, Hetzer R, Ewert R. Assessment of survival in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension: importance of cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Circulation. 2002;106:319–324. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000022687.18568.2a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yasunobu Y, Oudiz RJ, Sun XG, Hansen JE, Wasserman K. End-tidal PCO2 abnormality and exercise limitation in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension. Chest. 2005;127:1637–1646. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.5.1637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


