Skip to main content
World Journal of Hepatology logoLink to World Journal of Hepatology
. 2015 Apr 28;7(6):903–909. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i6.903

Aetiological factors of Budd-Chiari syndrome in Algeria

Nawel Afredj 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Nawal Guessab 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Abdelbasset Nani 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Sid Ahmed Faraoun 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Ibtissem Ouled Cheikh 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Rafik Kerbouche 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Djouhar Hannoun 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Zine Charef Amir 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Hayet Ait Kaci 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Kamel Bentabak 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Aurélie Plessier 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Dominique-Charles Valla 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Valerie Cazals-Hatem 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Marie-Hélène Denninger 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Tadjeddine Boucekkine 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, Nabil Debzi 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
PMCID: PMC4411532  PMID: 25937867

Abstract

AIM: To study the clinical presentation of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) and identify the aetiologies of this disease in Algeria.

METHODS: Patients with BCS, hospitalised in our unit from January 2004 until June 2010 were included and the aetiological factors were assessed. Patients presenting a BCS in the setting of advanced-stage cirrhosis or a liver transplantation were excluded from the study. The diagnosis was established when an obstruction of hepatic venous outflow (thrombosis, stenosis or compression) was demonstrated. We diagnosed myeloproliferative disease (MPD) by bone marrow biopsy and V617F JAK2 mutation. Anti-phospholipid syndrome (APLS) was detected by the presence of anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-β2 glycoprotein antibodies and Lupus anticoagulant. We also detected paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) by flow cytometry. Celiac disease and Behçet disease were systematically investigated in our patients. Hereditary anticoagulant protein deficiencies were also assessed. We tested our patients for the G20210A mutation at Beaujon Hospital. Imaging procedures were performed to determine a local cause of BCS, such as a hydatid cyst or a liver tumour.

RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen patients were included. Mean follow up: 32.12 mo. Mean age: 34.41 years, M/F = 0.64. Chronic presentation was frequent: 63.5%. The revealing symptoms for the BCS were ascites (74.8%) and abdominal pain (42.6%). The most common site of thrombosis was the hepatic veins (72.2%). Involvement of the inferior vena cava alone was observed in 3 patients. According to the radiological investigations, BCS was primary in 94.7% of the cases (n = 109) and secondary in 5.2% (n = 6). An aetiology was identified in 77.4% of the patients (n = 89); it was multifactorial in 27% (n = 31). The predominant aetiology of BCS in our patients was a myeloproliferative disease, observed in 34.6% of cases. APLS was found in 21.7% and celiac disease in 11.4%. Other acquired conditions were: PNH (n = 4), systemic disease (n = 6) and inflammatory bowel disease (n = 5). Anticoagulant protein deficiency was diagnosed in 28% of the patients (n = 18), dominated by protein C deficiency (n = 13). Secondary BCS was caused by a compressing hydatic cyst (n = 5) and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1).

CONCLUSION: The main aetiologic factor of BCS in Algeria is MPD. The frequency of celiac disease justifies its consideration when BCS is diagnosed in our region.

Keywords: Algeria, Etiologie, Celiac disease, Budd-Chiari, Thrombosis


Core tip: Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a rare disease, but it seems quite common in our country and in North Africa in general. However, we do not know the etiological features of this disease in our region. We collected 115 cases of BCS in 6 years. A fairly complete etiologic assessment was achieved. We identified the cause of BCS in 77%. It was multifactorial in 27%. The etiologies were dominated by the myeloproliferative disease 34%, followed by antiphospholipid syndrome in 21%. Finally, the etiological distribution in our patients does not differ too much from what is reported in Western countries.

INTRODUCTION

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) has been characterised by a panel of European experts as a group of disorders that results from an obstruction of hepatic venous outflow at any level from the small hepatic veins (HV) to the junction of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and the right atrium. BCS may be secondary to a non-thrombotic obstruction of hepatic venous drainage pathways, but in most cases, it is related to a venous thrombosis. This is referred to as primary BCS. Heart failure, constrictive pericarditis and veno-occlusive disease are excluded from this definition[1].

BCS is a rare disease, with an estimated prevalence of 2 per 100000 inhabitants and an annual incidence of approximately 0.2 cases per million inhabitants[2].

The clinical presentation of BCS depends on the extent and the acute or progressive occurrence of venous thrombosis. We distinguish asymptomatic forms of BCS, which are discovered fortuitously, and symptomatic forms, which can be acute or chronic. The acute form is characterised by abdominal pain, ascites and hepatomegaly, without evidence of portal hypertension. This form can be complicated by fulminant hepatitis. The chronic form is difficult to distinguish from cirrhosis regardless of the aetiology. The subacute form is characterised by features of acute BCS with portal hypertension. It reflects an extension of a previous occurrence of thrombosis in the HV.

Primary BCS is the clinical expression of an underlying thrombotic condition that should be identified by an exhaustive aetiological investigation.

The causal mechanism of venous thrombosis, which is frequently multifactorial, often involves a myeloproliferative disorder (MPD)[1,2]. The purpose of this work was to identify causal factors of BCS in Algeria. We also sought to study the anatomic aspects and the clinical presentation of BCS in our patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study that included consecutive patients, over the age of 16 years with BCS, who were hospitalised in our unit from January 2004 until June 2010. Patients who presented with BCS complicating advanced-stage cirrhosis and transplantation were excluded from the study. At inclusion, Doppler ultra-sound exploration, triphasic computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance (MR) angiography were performed in all patients, to confirm the diagnosis.

The diagnosis was established when a thrombosis, a stenosis or a compression of hepatic venous outflow (HV and/or suprahepatic IVC) was demonstrated. We also looked for indirect signs of BCS, such as HV dilatation upstream of a stenosis, spiderweb collateral venous circulation between HV, enlarged segment I of the liver or patchy enhancement of hepatic parenchyma.

For the aetiological work-up, we looked for acquired causes of thrombosis, especially MPD, with a bone marrow biopsy (BMB) and a test for V617F JAK2 mutation by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) (JAK2 MutaQuant kit, Ipsogen). In doubtful cases, a second examination of the BMB was performed in the pathology unit of Beaujon Hospital in Paris. The diagnosis of MPD was established using the World Health Organization 2008 revised criteria[3]. MPD was considered latent if BMB was abnormal and/or if a JAK2 mutation was found while the blood count was normal.

Tests were conducted to detect anticardiolipin (ACL) IgG and IgM antibodies, anti-β2 glycoprotein antibodies and lupus anticoagulant to determine the presence of anti-phospholipid syndrome (APLS). Patients were considered positive when the results from two successive tests performed within a 2 to 3 mo interval exceeded the cutoff levels of 20 U/L for ACL antibodies and 10 U/mL for A2βGP antibodies. Autoantibody tests were also performed to distinguish primary and secondary APLS that may be associated with Lupus.

The classical diagnostic criteria were used to identify Behçet’s disease[4]; genotyping for the Human Major Histocompatibility Complex (HLA) B51 was performed in doubtful cases. To identify paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) in patients with haemolytic anemia and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, flow cytometry was performed to detect CD55/CD59 deficient peripheral blood cells.

The systematic assessment for celiac disease included tests for anti-endomysium and/or anti-transglutaminase antibodies and duodenal biopsies in patients without major coagulation disorders. PCR for HLA class I and class II antigens was performed in seven patients with both celiac disease and BCS. The work-up included an examination of other acquired prothombotic disorders including hyperhomocysteinaemia, inflammatory bowel disease and tuberculosis.

We also looked for an inherited cause of thrombosis (i.e., proteins C, S or antithrombin III deficiency). When a family survey was not available, the deficiency in anticoagulant proteins was considered to be a primary disorder in the absence of severe liver failure (prothrombine time > 60%), nephrotic syndrome, acute thrombosis or anticoagulant treatment. Activated protein C resistance was used to diagnose a factor V mutation, because genetic testing (Leiden mutation) was not available. The prothrombin gene was sequenced in 21 patients in the molecular biology unit of Beaujon Hospital, to detect the G20210A mutation.

We also looked for oral contraceptive use or the occurrence of BCS during or after pregnancy. Appropriate imaging procedures were performed to search for a local cause of BCS, notably a hydatid cyst or a liver tumour.

The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Estimated variables are reported with the 95% confidence interval. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Fisher’s exact test and the χ2 test were used for the comparison of qualitative variables and the Fisher-Snedecor test was used for the comparison of quantitative and qualitative variables.

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients were included in this study. The mean time from the onset of symptoms to the diagnosis was 13.03 ± 4.5 mo (range: 4 d-10 years). The mean patient age was 34 years; the M/F sex-ratio was 0.64. The majority of patients were aged from 20 to 29 years at the time of diagnosis. The chronic form of BCS predominated, which was observed in 63.5% of the patients (n = 73). In contrast, the acute form was found in 8.7% of the patients (n = 10) and the fulminant form was observed in 3 patients.

BCS was latent and was discovered fortuitously in 9.6% of the patients (n = 11). In the majority of cases, BCS was revealed by ascites and abdominal pain, as observed in 74.8% and 42.6% of patients respectively. Revealing symptoms are reported in Table 1.

Table 1.

Revealing symptoms

Symptoms n %
Ascites 86 74.8
Abdominal pain 49 42.6
Jaundice 16 13.9
Bleeding 14 12.2
Hepatic encephalopathy 6 5.2
Fever 18 15.7
Lower limb edema 15 13

Ascites and gastrointestinal bleeding were more frequent in patients with the chronic form of BCS, however, as might be expected, pain, fever and an elevated transaminase level were predominantly observed in the acute and sub-acute forms of the disease. This difference was highly significant (P < 0.001). Demographic, clinical and laboratory features are reported in Table 2.

Table 2.

Clinical and laboratory characteristics at diagnosis

Demographic parameters
Age (yr) 34 (16-72)
M/F (n) 45/70
Distribution by age, n (%)
< 20 yr 8 (9)
20-40 yr 63 (72)
> 40 yr 29 (34)
Clinical parameters n (%)
Disease onset
Acute 8.7 (10)
Chronic 63.5 (73)
Subacute 27.8 (32)
Ascites 62.6 (72)
Hepatomegaly 62.6 (72)
Splenomegaly 42.6 (49)
Thoraco-abdominal venous collaterals 43.5 (50)
Lumber venous collaterals 11.3 (13)
Hepatic encephalopathy 3.5 (4)
Jaundice 40 (46)
Lower limb oedema 24.3 (28)
Biological parameters
ALT (ULN) 2.5 (1-60)
Bilirubin (mg/dL) 20.58 (3-265)
Prothrombin time (%) 57 (14-98)
Haemoglobin (g/dL) 11.7 (3-17)
RBC (106/mm3) 4.5 (1.7-7.9)
WBC (103/mm3) 7.7 (1.3-21.5)
Platelet count (/mm3) 263212 (29000-695000)
Albumin (g/L) 29.4 (16.7-45)
Thrombocytosis n (%) 20 (23)
Erythrocytosis n (%) 11.3 (13)
Hyperleucocytosis n (%) 25.2 (29)
Cholestasis n (%) 73.9 (85)
Hyperbilirubinaemia n (%) 41.7 (48)
Elevated liver enzymes n (%) 49.6 (57)
Liver failure n (%) 61.7 (71)
Renal failure n (%) 9.5 (11)

ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; ULN: Upper limit of normal; M/F: Male/female; RBC: Red blood cells; WBC: White blood cells.

The Child-Pugh classification scores at admission were: B (n = 62, 53.9%); A (n = 34, 29.6%); C (n = 19, 16.5%).

Doppler ultrasound was performed in 90% of patients (n = 104) and established the diagnosis in 87%. For the remaining cases, the diagnosis was based on the CT-scan. MR-angiography completed the work-up in 46% of patients (n = 53). According to the radiological investigations, BCS was secondary in 5.3% (n = 6) and primary in 94.7% (n = 109). Secondary BCS was caused by a hydatic liver cyst (n = 5) or hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1). Isolated involvement of the HV was observed in 72% of patients and both the HV and IVC were involved in 25.2%. Involvement of the IVC alone was observed in 3 patients. Thrombosis in other venous areas was observed in 32.7% of the cases (Table 3). Thoraco-abdominal collateral venous circulation (CVC) was predominant in patients with an isolated HV thrombosis (P = 0.05), whereas lumbar CVC was prevalent in patients with combined HV and IVC thrombosis (P = 0.007). A dysmorphic liver was found in 64.3% of patients (n = 74). Hypertrophy of the caudate lobe was noted in 86.1% of the cases (n = 99). Intrahepatic collateral veins typical of BCS were found in 81.7% (n = 94) and hypervascular regenerative macronodules were observed in 27.8% of the patients (n = 32).

Table 3.

Radiological features

Thrombosis site n %
Hepatic veins 83 72.2
IVC 3 2.6
IVC and HV 29 25.2
Associated thrombosis 37/113 32.2
Retrohepatic IVC 7 6.0
Portal vein 26 22.6
Mesenteric vein/splenic vein 4 3.4
Renal veins 4 3.4
Iliac veins 3 2.6

IVC: Inferior vena cava; HV: Hepatic veins.

The aetiologies of BCS are reported in Table 4. At least one cause of BCS was found in 77.4% of the cases (n = 89) and a combination of several prothrombotic conditions was noted in 27% (n = 31). The most common aetiological association was MPD and APLS. Secondary BCS was often associated with an underlying thrombophilia.

Table 4.

Budd-Chiari syndrome aetiologies

Aetiologies Tested patients n % (n/tested n)
MPD 104 36 34.6
Patent 19
Latent 17
APL syndrome 92 20 21.7
Protein C deficiency 67 13 19.4
Protein S deficiency 59 5 8.5
Antithrombin deficiency 68 0 0
APCR 68 7 10.3
Celiac disease 88 10 11.4
Hyperhomocysteinaemia 42 5 11.9
PNH 11 4
Systemic disease1 106 6 5.6
Inflammatory bowel disease2 60 5 8.3
Gene II mutation 21 1 4.7
Liver hydatic cyst 115 5 4.3
Hepatocellular carcinoma 115 1 0.8
Hormonal factors 70 25 35.7
Oral contraception 70 24 34.3
Pregnancy 70 3 4.3
Hormonal treatment 70 1 1.4
Unknown aetiology 24 20.9
1

Systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 1), granulomatosis (n = 1), sarcoidosis (n = 1), Behçet disease (n = 3);

2

Ulcerative colitis (n = 1), Crohn’s disease (n = 4). PNH: Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria; APL: Anti-phospholipid syndrome; APCR: Activated protein C resistance; MPD: Myeloproliferative disease.

MPD was the predominant causal factor of BCS and was observed in 34% (n = 36) of the tested patients. A BMB was performed in 95 cases (83%) and testing for the JAK2 mutation was performed in 53 patients (46%). The MPD was patent in 19 cases (polyglobulia n = 5; essential thrombocytaemia n = 9; myelofibrosis n = 5) and latent in 17 cases. Fourteen patients were positive for the JAK2 mutation and 30 patients had signs of MPD on BMB. Among patients with JAK2 mutation, 8 had histological features of MPD. The BMB was not contributive otherwise (n = 6). Patients with and without MPD were comparable; no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups with respect to the mean age, sex ratio, disease onset or site of thrombosis.

ACL antibodies were detected in 21% of the tested patients (n = 20), and were associated with systemic lupus in one patient. A second cause of thrombophilia was associated with APLS in 79% of these patients.

Celiac disease was found in 10 patients and was diagnosed during the work-up for BCS in most cases (n = 6). In these patients, an underlying thrombophilia, apart from celiac disease was noted in only 40% of cases. The immunogenetic study failed to disclose any HLA class I specificity. With respect to the HLA class II antigens, the patients were positive for DQβ1*02 and/or DQβ1*03, two alleles strongly linked with celiac disease and for alleles DRβ1*04 and/or DRβ1*07 which are known to be in linkage disequilibrium with DQβ1*03 and DQβ1*02.

PNH was found in 4 patients and had been undetected prior to the BCS work-up in 3 of them. Severe anaemia with an elevated LDH level was found in 3 patients; the flow cytometry results were positive in all of these patients (n = 4). An associated splanchnic vein thrombosis was also found in 100% of cases (n = 4).

Other acquired causes of thrombosis were: systemic disease (n = 6) and inflammatory bowel disease (n = 5).

Anticoagulant protein deficiency was observed in 28% of patients (n = 18), dominated by protein C deficiency (n = 13). Only 5 patients demonstrated a protein S deficiency, one had a mutation in the prothrombin gene and no patient demonstrated an antithrombin deficiency.

In 3 cases, BCS occurred during pregnancy or during the post-partum period. Nevertheless, a general cause of thrombosis was found in the majority of these patients.

DISCUSSION

This series collected 115 cases of BCS over a period of seven years in a single centre, which corresponds to approximately 18 cases annually. This is comparable with the data provided by the French national BCS observatory (20 new cases/year)[5]. The present series is the largest reported to date in North Africa.

Except for a few series in Asia, where the mean age was less than 30 years[6,7] and the M/F sex-ratio > 1[8], BCS has generally been observed in young female patients[9-11]. This was the case in our series where the M/F ratio was 0.6, and the mean age was 34 years.

The diagnosis of BCS depends on the results of non-invasive imaging techniques. Though the results of Doppler-ultrasound are operator-dependent, its estimated diagnostic yield is 90%, according to recent studies[12-14], or even greater with advanced technical devices such as contrast ultrasound[15]. The diagnostic yield was estimated to be 87% in our series. MR-angiography should be proposed if the diagnosis by Doppler ultrasound is doubtful, because it avoids the radiation exposure associated with CT-angiography. In our work, MR-angiography was performed in only 46.1% of the patients because it was not available before October 2007.

Isolated HV involvement occurred in 72% of our patients. This same pattern is generally reported in European series[11,16], but not in Asian series, particularly those from Japan, where IVC obstruction is frequent[5,17]. Splanchnic thrombosis, which worsens the prognosis of patients with BCS, was observed in 23% in our series, which contrast with the literature, where this association is noted in less than 14%[8,9,11]. The number of aetiological factors has been significantly related to the extension of the thrombosis into the splanchnic territory[18]. Indeed, in our patients, multifactorial thrombophilia was more frequently observed among patients with combined BCS and portal vein involvement (34% vs 24% for isolated BCS). An earlier and well-conducted anticoagulant regimen would most likely reduce the rate of this complication which compromises the efficacy of the therapeutic options for BCS.

Our work-up, although incomplete, enabled an etiological diagnosis in 77.4% of cases.

In the literature, the cause of thrombophilia was found in 87%, 72% and 84% of the cases presented in recent studies from India[8], Turkey[19] and Europe[9] respectively. The causes encountered in our work were similar to those observed in Europe, with a clear predominance of MPD. In Southeast Asian countries, bacterial and parasitic infections have been suggested to be risk factors for IVC thrombosis[8,20,21]. In recent studies from India, the aetiological profile of SBC has changed. Prothrombotic states are now found in more than 60% of the cases in those series[22,23], which is similar to the rates reported in Western series. This could be linked to the widespread availability of diagnostic tests, including the essays to detect the JAK2 mutation.

In our series, the rate of MPD-related BCS did not reach 50% as reported in the Western literature, but was most likely underestimated because only 46% of our patients were tested for JAK2 mutation. The concordance of the JAK2 mutation with BMB was not strong in our study: among the 14 patients with a positive mutation, only 8 (57%) had histological features of MPD on BMB. This finding is most likely related to the poor sample quality of the BMB.

In accordance with the data from the literature[2,9], the second leading cause of BCS in our patients after MPD was APLS. ACL antibodies were detected in 21.7% of the tested patients. An associated thrombophilia was observed in 75% of these patients. This result is comparable with data published by Espinoza from a series of 43 patients with APLS-associated BCS, where ACL antibodies were often associated with another thrombophilic disorder[24].

The rate of factor V Leiden mutation, the most common inherited cause of thrombophilia, was unusually low in our study. However, the only test available for the diagnosis of this condition at our centre was the activated protein C resistance test, which lacks diagnostic reliability, and most likely underestimates the frequency of this condition.

A high rate of celiac disease was also noted in our patients with BCS. This association seems to be frequent in North Africa. We found 16 published cases in the literature until 2012[25-35], and noted that 12 of them were originated from Algeria or Tunisia. Environmental factors, particularly geophagia or special diets might be involved, although they were not demonstrated. These factors were excluded in our patients. The immunogenetic study that was performed did not show any association with a specific major histocompatibility complex antigen in these patients[36]. Further information from a broader genetic study might be useful.

The frequency of celiac disease in Maghreb might also explain the high number of the association of celiac disease with BCS. An epidemiological study conducted in Oran (west Algeria) gave an estimated rate of 2.34 ± 1.3 celiac disease cases per 1000 live births[37]. In our setting, we thus propose a systematic search for celiac disease in the aetiological work-up for BCS.

All of patients with PNH died. The management of these patients was challenging in our setting because oral anticoagulants were often discontinued when haemolytic events occurred. This led to an extension of the thrombosis to the splanchnic veins. It should be noted, however, that Eculizumab was not yet available when this study was conducted. This treatment has significantly improved the prognosis of patients with PNH by reducing the rate of thromboembolic events[38]. Furthermore, in specialised centres, patients with PNH-BCS currently have the same prognosis as other patients with BCS[39].

As mentioned above, the aetiological workup was not exhaustive. The lack of molecular biolgy techniques constitutes the main limitation of our work. Tests for mutations in JAK2 and prothrombine genes were not performed in all patients, whereas tests for factor V Leiden mutation were simply unavailables. We used indirect methods for the diagnosis of this last condition, which may be insufficient. An improvement in the diagnostic tools should most likely enhance the results of the aetiological investigation in our patients.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that BCS is not rare in Algeria and that the predominant cause of thrombophilia is MPD, as reported in Western countries. There is however one particular aspect that concerns the presence of celiac disease and hydatid cysts of the liver that should be systematically included in the aetiological work-up of BCS in our geographic location.

COMMENTS

Background

The relevance of this article is that Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) has never been explored in the authors’ region. Practitioners often associated BCS with Behçet’s disease; the authors provided an update on this pathology, imperfectly known, and they proved that the predominant etiology was not Behçet’s disease but the myeloproliferative syndrome.

Research frontiers

This is a research work because the authors identified the etiologies of this disease in Algeria, which were not previously known. The results can serve as reference for future works on this field. The authors achieved an etiological assessment including molecular biology, like JAK2 mutation and prothrombin gene mutation. Some of these tests have required moving abroad to achieve them. For all this, they can consider that this is research work.

Innovations and breakthroughs

Some studies have been made in the same field in Algeria and other Maghreb countries but it was a low sample studies or case reports. The authors work will allow a breakthrough in understanding the etiologies of BCS in their region.

Applications

The work has practical applications. Thus, in any patient with Budd-Chiari originated from Algeria or even from Maghreb, practitioners must first search for a myeloproliferative syndrome or systemic autoimmune disease. Celiac disease should also be sought systematically, given the frequency of the association of these two diseases in their study.

Terminology

The authors ensured that the words used in the text are easily understood by all scientists’ readers. Abbreviations are always enclosed in parentheses, next to the full name at the first appearance in the text.

Peer-review

The authors have performed a good study, the manuscript is interesting.

Footnotes

P- Reviewer: Jadallah KA, Wei L, Yuan SM S- Editor: Tian YL L- Editor: A E- Editor: Liu SQ

Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Peer-review started: July 27, 2014

First decision: August 14, 2014

Article in press: March 5, 2015

References

  • 1.Janssen HL, Garcia-Pagan JC, Elias E, Mentha G, Hadengue A, Valla DC; European Group for the Study of Vascular Disorders of the Liver. Budd-Chiari syndrome: a review by an expert panel. J Hepatol. 2003;38:364–371. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(02)00434-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Valla DC. Primary Budd-Chiari syndrome. J Hepatol. 2009;50:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tefferi A, Vardiman JW. Classification and diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasms: the 2008 World Health Organization criteria and point-of-care diagnostic algorithms. Leukemia. 2008;22:14–22. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Criteria for diagnosis of Behçet’s disease. International Study Group for Behçet’s Disease. Lancet. 1990;335:1078–1080. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Valla DC. Hepatic venous outflow tract etiopathogenesis. Asia versus the west. J Gastroen Hepatol. 2004;19:S204–S211. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shrestha SM, Okuda K, Uchida T, Maharjan KG, Shrestha S, Joshi BL, Larsson S, Vaidya Y. Endemicity and clinical picture of liver disease due to obstruction of the hepatic portion of the inferior vena cava in Nepal. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;11:170–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1996.tb00056.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Singh V, Sinha SK, Nain CK, Bambery P, Kaur U, Verma S, Chawla YK, Singh K. Budd-Chiari syndrome: our experience of 71 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;15:550–554. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02157.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Amarapurkar DN, Punamiya SJ, Patel ND. Changing spectrum of Budd-Chiari syndrome in India with special reference to non-surgical treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:278–285. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Darwish Murad S, Plessier A, Hernandez-Guerra M, Fabris F, Eapen CE, Bahr MJ, Trebicka J, Morard I, Lasser L, Heller J, et al. Etiology, management, and outcome of the Budd-Chiari syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:167–175. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-3-200908040-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zeitoun G, Escolano S, Hadengue A, Azar N, El Younsi M, Mallet A, Boudet MJ, Hay JM, Erlinger S, Benhamou JP, et al. Outcome of Budd-Chiari syndrome: a multivariate analysis of factors related to survival including surgical portosystemic shunting. Hepatology. 1999;30:84–89. doi: 10.1002/hep.510300125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Darwish Murad S, Valla DC, de Groen PC, Zeitoun G, Hopmans JA, Haagsma EB, van Hoek B, Hansen BE, Rosendaal FR, Janssen HL. Determinants of survival and the effect of portosystemic shunting in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome. Hepatology. 2004;39:500–508. doi: 10.1002/hep.20064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Buckley O, O’ Brien J, Snow A, Stunell H, Lyburn I, Munk PL, Torreggiani WC. Imaging of Budd-Chiari syndrome. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2071–2078. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0537-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Erden A. Budd-Chiari syndrome: a review of imaging findings. Eur J Radiol. 2007;61:44–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bolondi L, Gaiani S, Li Bassi S, Zironi G, Bonino F, Brunetto M, Barbara L. Diagnosis of Budd-Chiari syndrome by pulsed Doppler ultrasound. Gastroenterology. 1991;100:1324–1331. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rossi S, Rosa L, Ravetta V, Cascina A, Quaretti P, Azzaretti A, Scagnelli P, Tinelli C, Dionigi P, Calliada F. Contrast-enhanced versus conventional and color Doppler sonography for the detection of thrombosis of the portal and hepatic venous systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:763–773. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mahmoud AE, Mendoza A, Meshikhes AN, Olliff S, West R, Neuberger J, Buckels J, Wilde J, Elias E. Clinical spectrum, investigations and treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome. QJM. 1996;89:37–43. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.qjmed.a030135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Okuda H, Yamagata H, Obata H, Iwata H, Sasaki R, Imai F, Okudaira M, Ohbu M, Okuda K. Epidemiological and clinical features of Budd-Chiari syndrome in Japan. J Hepatol. 1995;22:1–9. doi: 10.1016/0168-8278(95)80252-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Darwish Murad S, Valla DC, de Groen PC, Zeitoun G, Haagsma EB, Kuipers EJ, Janssen HL. Pathogenesis and treatment of Budd-Chiari syndrome combined with portal vein thrombosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:83–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00353.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Uskudar O, Akdogan M, Sasmaz N, Yilmaz S, Tola M, Sahin B. Etiology and portal vein thrombosis in Budd-Chiari syndrome. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:2858–2862. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.2858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Victor S, Jayanthi V, Panchanadam M, Chitra S, Vijayalakshmi CS, Madanagopalan N. Budd Chiari syndrome and pericaval filariasis. Trop Gastroenterol. 1994;15:161–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shrestha SM, Shrestha S. Hepatic vena cava disease: Etiologic relation to bacterial infection. Hepatol Res. 2007;37:196–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2007.00012.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mohanty D, Shetty S, Ghosh K, Pawar A, Abraham P. Hereditary thrombophilia as a cause of Budd-Chiari syndrome: a study from Western India. Hepatology. 2001;34:666–670. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.27948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pati HP, Dayal S, Srivastava A, Pande GK, Acharya SK. Spectrum of hemostatic derangements, in Budd-Chiari syndrome. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2003;22:59–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Espinosa G, Font J, García-Pagan JC, Tàssies D, Reverter JC, Gaig C, Cervantes F, Cervera R, Bosch J, Ingelmo M. Budd-Chiari syndrome secondary to antiphospholipid syndrome: clinical and immunologic characteristics of 43 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2001;80:345–354. doi: 10.1097/00005792-200111000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gelsi E, Ruitord F, Saint-Paul MC, Filippi J, Arab K, Hébuterne X. [Association of Budd-Chiari syndrome with a coeliac disease in patient native from North Africa] Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2004;28:903–905. doi: 10.1016/s0399-8320(04)95155-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Martínez F, Berenguer M, Prieto M, Montes H, Rayón M, Berenguer J. Budd-Chiari syndrome caused by membranous obstruction of the inferior vena cava associated with coeliac disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2004;36:157–162. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2003.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.El Younsi S, Nassif T, Kuoch V, Boytchev I, Pelletier G, Buffet C. [Association of Budd-Chiari syndrome and celiac disease] Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2003;27:236–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Manzano ML, Garfia C, Manzanares J, Urruzuno P, Yela C, Castellano G, Solís JA. [Celiac disease and Bud-Chiari syndrome: an uncommon association] Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;25:159–161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Aguirrebarrena G, Pulcinelli S, Giovannoni AG, Gidekel L. [Celiac disease and Budd-Chiari syndrome: infrequent association] Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2001;93:611–612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marteau P, Cadranel JF, Messing B, Gargot D, Valla D, Rambaud JC. Association of hepatic vein obstruction and coeliac disease in North African subjects. J Hepatol. 1994;20:650–653. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(05)80355-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hamdi A, Ayachi R, Saad H, Gargouri R, Zouari K, Chebbah MS. [Hemiplegia revealing Budd-Chiari syndrome associated with celiac disease in an infant] Presse Med. 1990;19:1011–1012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Boudhina T, Ghram N, Ben Becher S, Ayach R, Ben Ghachem K, Yedes A, Hamza M. [Budd-Chiari syndrome and total villous atrophy in children: apropos of 3 case reports] Tunis Med. 1990;68:59–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ouakaa-Kchaou A, Ennaifer R, Belhadj N, Gargouri D, Elloumi H, Romani M, Kochlef A, Kilani A, Kharrat J, Ghorbel A. [Celiac disease associated with Budd-Chiari syndrome] Presse Med. 2008;37:239–241. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2007.05.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ben Hriz F, Habbassi H, Maamouri N, Azaiez O, Chaabouni H, Chouaib S, Mnif E, Ben Mami N. [Budd-Chiari syndrome associated with celiac disease] Rev Med Interne. 2010;31:160–162. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2008.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hmami F, Chaouki S, Souilmi FZ, Abourazzak S, Idrissi M, Atmani S, Hida M. [Association of celiac disease and Budd-Chiari syndrome: a case report] Arch Pediatr. 2011;18:102. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2010.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Afredj N, Metatla S, Faraoun SA, Nani A, Guessab N, Benhalima M, Bendib SE, Debzi N, Layaida K, Gamar L, et al. Association of Budd-Chiari syndrome and celiac disease. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2010;34:621–624. doi: 10.1016/j.gcb.2010.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bessahraoui M, Bouziane Nedjadi K, Naceur M, Niar S, Bouchetara A, Bouhamidi M. Eur Acad Paediatr. Nice (France) Poster: 2008. p. 181. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hillmen P, Muus P, Dührsen U, Risitano AM, Schubert J, Luzzatto L, Schrezenmeier H, Szer J, Brodsky RA, Hill A, et al. Effect of the complement inhibitor eculizumab on thromboembolism in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Blood. 2007;110:4123–4128. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-095646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hoekstra J, Leebeek FW, Plessier A, Raffa S, Darwish Murad S, Heller J, Hadengue A, Chagneau C, Elias E, Primignani M, et al. Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria in Budd-Chiari syndrome: findings from a cohort study. J Hepatol. 2009;51:696–706. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Hepatology are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

RESOURCES