Abstract
The autotrophic Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1 can grow by coupling the oxidation of ferrous iron to the reduction of oxygen. Soluble ferrous iron is oxidized at the surface of the cell by an MtoAB porin-cytochrome complex that functions as an electron conduit through the outer membrane. Electrons are then transported to the cytoplasmic membrane where they are used to generate proton motive force (PMF) (for ATP synthesis) and NADH for autotrophic processes such as carbon fixation. As part of the mtoAB gene cluster, S. lithotrophicus also contains the gene mtoD that is proposed to encode a cytochrome c protein. We isolated mtoD from a Shewanella oneidensis expression system where the mtoD gene was expressed on a pBAD plasmid vector. Biochemical, biophysical, and crystallographic characterization of the purified MtoD revealed it as an 11 kDa monomeric protein containing a single heme. Sequence and structural alignment indicated that MtoD belonged to the class-1 cytochrome c family and had a similar fold to ferricytochrome c552 family, however the MtoD heme is bis-histidine coordinated and is substantially more exposed than the hemes of other family members. The reduction potential of the MtoD heme at pH 7 was +155 mV vs. Standard Hydrogen Electrode, which is approximately 100 mV lower than that of mitochondrial cytochrome c. Consideration of the properties of MtoD in the context of the potential respiratory partners identified from the genome suggests that MtoD could associate to multiple electron transfer partners as the primary periplasmic electron shuttle.
Keywords: class 1 cytochrome, MtoD, Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1, iron oxidation
Introduction
The potential for bacteria to utilize iron as an energy source has been widely recognized in recent years (Bird et al., 2011; Konhauser et al., 2011). Several families of bacteria live at the microoxic/ferrous iron interface where they can survive by coupling the oxidation of ferrous iron to the reduction of oxygen (Hedrich et al., 2011). These bacteria are typically autotrophic and generate sufficient energy from this reaction to fix carbon dioxide and dinitrogen. Bacteria that are capable of this chemolithoautotrophic growth include acidophilic bacteria involved in acid mine drainage such as Acidothiobacillus ferrooxidans and Leptospirillum ferrooxidans (Rawlings et al., 1999; Ferguson and Ingledew, 2008; Mishra and Rhee, 2014); the marine stalk-forming Gallionella ferruginea and the freshwater Gallionella capsiferriformans ES-2 and Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1 (Hallbeck et al., 1993; Emerson and Moyer, 1997). The genomes of these organisms have been sequenced revealing a range of putative metabolic pathways (Emerson et al., 2013) and analysis of these pathways poses a range of interesting questions: how do the bacteria extract the electrons from the ferrous iron, and how are those electrons ultimately coupled to the generation of NADH and a proton motive force (PMF)?
The best studied of the iron oxidizing bacteria is the acidophilic A. ferrooxidans, where an outer membrane monoheme Cyc2 collects electrons from the oxidation of Fe(II) to Fe(III) and transfers them to a periplasmic rusticyanin which then transfers the electrons to two potential shuttles, the diheme cytochromes Cyc1 and CycA1. These diheme cytochromes then transfer the electrons down divergent routes, either to a cytochrome bc1 complex where electrons enter the quinol pool to ultimately generate NADH, or an aa3 oxidase where oxygen is reduced to water together with the transport of protons across the membrane (Bonnefoy and Holmes, 2012; Roger et al., 2012).
The neutrophilic S. lithotrophicus ES-1 does not contain any genes with significant homology for cyc2, but instead contains the genes mtoA (Slit_2497) and mtoB (Slit_2496) (Liu et al., 2012). These are homologs of Shewanella oneidensis mtrA and mtrB, which encode a decaheme cytochrome MtrA and transmembrane porin MtrB. These two proteins form a porin-cytochrome complex in the outer membrane of S. oneidensis that allows for efficient electron transport through the outer membrane via a chain of hemes (Hartshorne et al., 2009; White et al., 2013). It has been proposed that MtoA and MtoB fulfill a similar function in S. lithotrophicus ES-1, in forming an electron conduit that allows electrons to be collected from the oxidation of ferrous iron at the surface of the cell and transported through to the periplasm (Liu et al., 2012).
Both mtoA and mtoB are located in a gene cluster in the S. lithotrophicus ES-1 genome that also contains two other c-type cytochromes; Slit_2498 that encodes MtoD, a small mono-heme cytochrome and Slit_2495, which encodes CymAES−1, a tetraheme quinol oxidoreductase. As part of the same cluster it is possible that all four of these genes are co-transcribed and expressed as part of an operon. This would provide a porin-cytochrome complex (MtoAB), a soluble periplasmic cytochrome (MtoD), and a quinol oxidoreductase in the cytoplasmic membrane (CymAES−1) (Emerson et al., 2013).
S. lithotrophicus ES-1 also contains the genes necessary to express two distinct oxygenases, a cytochrome bb3 oxidase (cbb3), and a cytochrome bd1 oxidase (cbd1). These have been characterized in other bacteria and shown to have low KM-values for oxygen: typically cbd1 operates in the micromolar range while cbb3 operates in the sub-micromolar range. cbb3 couples O2 reduction to proton pumping and receives electrons from a cytochrome c, while cbd1 has no proton pumping mechanism and receives electrons directly from the quinol pool (Pitcher and Watmough, 2004).
The bioenergetic and biochemical mechanism of precisely how iron oxidizing bacteria are able to couple Fe oxidation to O2 reduction is still unclear. How do electrons from the MtoAB complex enter the cytochrome oxidase? It was previously suggested that CymAES−1 was the redox partner, however, this would result in the loss of protonmotive force. In order to better understand the possible roles of the periplasmic redox partners in S. lithotrophicus ES-1 the MtoD cytochrome was expressed in a recombinant form, purified and characterized using a range of biochemical, spectroscopic, and crystallographic techniques.
Materials and methods
Expression and isolation of strep-II tagged MtoD
The 354 bp sequence encoding mtoD was synthesized and cloned into a puc57 vector by GENScript. mtoD was amplified from pUC57 using the following primers: mtoD_1_F: 5′-ATG ACT CGT CAA GCT TAT TCC TCA ATG TTG and mtoD_1_R: 5′-GAG CGA AAG GAT CCA GTC CAC CAG. A second pair of primers were used to make modifications to mtoD including the addition of a 5′ CACC overhang, making the mtoD insert compatible with the desired pBAD202 D-TOPO cloning kit, followed by a ribosome binding sequence and a 3′ 6xCAC repeat coding for a C-terminal polyhistidine tag. mtoD_2_F: 5′-CAC CTA AGA AGG AGA TAT ACA TCC CAT GAC TCG TCA AGC TTA TTC. mtoD_R_6xHis: 5′-CTA GTG GTG GTG GTG GTG GTG GAG CGA AAG GAT C. A pBAD directional TOPO® expression kit was used clone mtoD-His into a pBAD202 expression vector. One Shot TOP10 E. coli cells were transformed with pBAD202_mtoD-His using methods described in the pBAD D-TOPO user guide. pBAD202_mtoD-His was conjugated from TOP10 to S. oneidensis MR-1 using E. coli helper strain DH5α pRK2013. Kanamycin and carbenicillin were used to select for successfully conjugated MR-1. DNA sequencing performed by Eurofins MWG operon using primers mtoD_2_F and mtoD_R_6xHis confirmed successful conjugation of pBAD202_mtoD-His into S. oneidensis MR-1. For the production of Strep II-tagged MtoD pBAD202_mtoD-His was isolated from S. oneidensis MR-1 using a miniprep kit and the whole plasmid was amplified using the primers mtoD_SII_F: 5′-AAT TCG AGA AGT AGA AGG GCG AGC TCA AGC TTG AAG GTA and mtoD_SII_R: 5′-GTG GAT GAG ACC AGA GCG AAA GGA TCC AGT CCA CAG G. The pBAD202_mtoD-His template was removed by DpnI digestion followed by PCR clean up. T4 polynucleotide kinase was used to phosphorylate the linear product and a blunt end ligation was performed using DNA ligase to circularize the pBAD202_mtoD-SII product. One Shot TOP10 E. coli were transformed with pBAD202_mtoD-SII and conjugation was used to produce recombinant S. oneidensis MR-1 as before.
Recombinant S. oneidensis MR-1_mtoD-SII was cultured aerobically at 30°C in 20 L batches in LB media. Expression of tagged protein was induced at mid-exponential phase (OD600: 0.5) by addition of L-arabinose to a working concentration of 2 mM. Cultures were incubated for a further 5 h and harvested by centrifugation at 6000 g for 15 min. Recombinant MR-1 cell pellets were re-suspended in 20 mM HEPES pH 7 buffer and three passes of French Press treatment at 1000 psi (6.89 MPa) were used to lyse the cells. The soluble cell fraction was isolated by ultracentrifugation of the lysate at 205,000 g for 2 h. The supernatant was retained for purification of tagged MtoD. MtoD was isolated using 5 mL Strep-Tactin affinity column (GE healthcare). The column was run with a 20 mM HEPES pH 7, 150 mM NaCl equilibration/wash buffer. Four cycles of loading and eluting were performed to isolate all of the expressed MtoD. SDS PAGE was used to analyze eluted fractions; MtoD fractions were dialysed with 20 mM HEPES pH 7, 150 mM NaCl overnight then concentrated in preparation for size exclusion chromatography. Gel filtration was performed using a Superdex S75 16/60 column. The column was equilibrated with 20 mM HEPES pH 7, 150 mM NaCl before loading MtoD and running at a flow rate of 0.5 mL.min−1. Pure fractions of MtoD, determined by SDS PAGE analysis, were pooled, concentrated and dialysed with 20 mM HEPES pH 7, 100 mM NaCl overnight at 4°C.
Pyridine hemochrome analysis of MtoD
Oxidized spectra of horse heart cytochrome c and MtoD were prepared in 20 mM HEPES pH 7 buffer containing 2 mM CaCl2 for cytochrome c, and 100 mM NaCl for MtoD. Each sample was fully oxidized with 10 μM K3Fe(CN)6 before measurement of UV/vis electronic absorption spectrum. The pyridine hemochrome method was used to quantify the concentration of heme in the purified MtoD sample and to determine the extinction coefficient of the Soret maxima of MtoD (Berry and Trumpower, 1987). Briefly cytochrome c and MtoD were mixed with pyridine and NaOH to give final concentrations of 3 and 75 mM, respectively. These samples were divided into two Suba-sealed quartz cuvettes. Samples were oxidized using 10 μM K3Fe(CN)6 and reduced with 3 mM Na2S2O4 to give the oxidized and reduced spectra of heme bis-pyridine. A Bio-Rad protein assay kit was used to determine the total protein concentration.
Sedimentation velocity
Four hundred and ten microliters of MtoD samples of 3.5 and 8.5 μM were measured into sample chambers of a two chamber cell assembly and 20 mM HEPES pH 7, 100 mM NaCl was measured into the reference chambers. A Beckman Optima XL-A analytical ultracentrifuge with an An50Ti rotor was used to optically measure sedimentation, monitoring absorbance at 406 nm with a rotational speed of 42,000 rpm. 300 radial scans were performed over a 20-h period at a constant temperature of 20°C. Analyses of the sedimentation velocity data were performed using SEDFIT (Brown and Schuck, 2006). The C(s) distribution model was applied to the data and non-linear fitting was performed. Buffer density and viscosity parameters (1.0039 g.mL−1 and 1.0264 × 10 −2 ρ, respectively) in addition to predicted v-bar for MtoD (0.7282 mL.g−1), were included in the C(s) model to solve Lamm equations.
MtoD crystallization and data collection
A pure solution of MtoD was concentrated to 30 mg.mL−1 and sparse matrix screening, using the sitting drop method, was performed to explore potential crystallization conditions. Crystals formed at 16°C in 0.6 μl drops at ratios of 1:1 or 2:1 mother liquor/protein. The mother liquor was 0.1 M KCN, 30% PEG 2000 MME. Crystals were cryo-protected by transferring to a solution of mother liquor containing 12% glycerol before being vitrified by plunging into liquid nitrogen. Data were collected on MtoD crystals in a gaseous stream of nitrogen at 100 K on beamlines I03 at the Diamond Light Source (UK). MtoD crystals were of space group P22121 with typical cell dimensions of a = 29.70, b = 40.20, c = 92.180 Å. A SAD dataset was collected at a wavelength of 1.72 Å to a final resolution of 2.5 Å. Further datasets from single crystals were collected using an x-ray wavelength of 0.97 Å.
MtoD structure determination and refinement
MtoD datasets were processed using XIA2 (Winter, 2010). The SAD dataset of MtoD was analyzed using the autosol pipeline within the PHENIX software suite (Adams et al., 2010). The program HySS located one heavy atom site and the electron density maps calculated with PHASER/RESOLVE were sufficiently interpretable to manually place a single heme corresponding to a single MtoD molecule in the asymmetric unit. The model building program Phenix AutoBuild was used to build residues followed by alternating rounds of manual building and refinement using PHENIX (Adams et al., 2010) or REFMAC (Murshudov et al., 2011). The final model was refined to an Rcryst (Rfree) value of 19.4 (24.5)%. This model has no residues in the disallowed region of the Ramachadran plot. Coordinates have been deposited in the RCSB Protein Data bank under accession code 4XXL.
Electrochemistry
Mediated redox spectropotentiometry of a solution of MtoD was performed using methods described previously (Bamford et al., 2002). Experiments were performed under continuous argon gas flow with a solution of 5.5 μM MtoD in 20 mM HEPES pH 7, 100 mM NaCl containing 10 μM each of the following mediators: 2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine (DAD), phenazine methosulphate (PMS), phenazine ethosulphate (PES), 5-hydroxy-1,4-napthoquinone, 2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-1,4-benzoquinone, 2-methyl-1,4-napthoquinone, 9,10-anthraquinone-2,6-disulphonic acid, anthraquinone-2-sulphonic acid and 1,1′-dibenzyl-4,4′-bipyridinium dichloride. The electrochemical potential was raised or lowered through the addition of aliquots of anaerobic solutions containing potassium ferricyanide or sodium dithionite, respectively.
Results
Expression, purification, and characterization of S. lithotrophicus MtoD
MtoD was purified to homogeneity from S. oneidensis as described in Methods. SDS-PAGE analysis revealed that MtoD ran as a single band with apparent molecular weight of 13 kDa, slightly larger than the predicted molecular weight of 11 kDa due to the c-terminal strep-II tag (Figure 1A). Edman degradation (PNAC facility, Cambridge UK) revealed the N-terminal sequence began AVDVD, matching the cleavage site predicted by SignalP (Petersen et al., 2011) and pyridine hemochrome assays revealed that the sample of MtoD contained approximately stoichiometric ratio of 0.85 heme: protein, giving an ε410 coefficient of 105.2 mM−1 cm−1.
Solutions of MtoD display electronic absorbance spectra consistent with the presence of a low-spin c-type heme (Figure 1B). The characteristic Soret peak in the oxidized protein has a maximum at 406 nm, giving a 280/406 nm absorbance ratio of 0.19. The 406 nm maximum shifts to 416 nm on reduction of MtoD and α and β peaks appear with maxima at 549 and 520 nm, respectively. Spectral features above 600 nm would be indicative of high-spin ferric heme or low-spin ferric heme with His/Met axial heme ligation as is typically observed in other class-1 cytochrome-c family members (Bertini et al., 2006). However, MtoD displayed no detectable absorbance above 600 nm in agreement with the heme ligand set resolved by X-ray diffraction as described below. Mediated potentiometric titration of MtoD monitored by electronic absorbance spectroscopy defined the heme redox properties (Figure 2A). Changes in the absorbance at 549 nm due to the ferric/ferrous heme interconversion were fully reversible with change of solution potential (Figure 2B). The behavior was in excellent agreement with that predicted by the Nernst equation for a single redox center undergoing a one-electron redox transformation with a mid-point potential of 155 ± 10 mV vs. SHE.
The biophysical properties of MtoD in solution were examined using sedimentation velocity. MtoD samples at 3.5 and 8.5 μM were centrifuged as described in methods and the migration profile of MtoD at 406 nm was measured over 5 h (Figure 3A). The data was fitted using the software program SEDFIT which revealed a single species with a sedimentation coefficient of 1.55 s and a molecular mass of 11.7 kDa (Figure 3B). Further analysis of the sedimentation data gave a f/fo coefficient of 1.24, indicating that MtoD behaved like a monomeric globular protein in solution.
The crystal structure of MtoD was solved to an initial resolution of 2.29 Å by single wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD) using the anomalous signal caused by the single iron atom contained within the heme group. The initial model was used as a template for molecular replacement to obtain a final resolution of 1.47 Å. The overall statistics obtained for data collection and structure refinement are given in Supplementary Table 1. The crystal structure contained residues 28–119 of the processed amino acid sequence and a single c-type heme covalently attached to Cys43 and Cys46 via thioether bonds (Figure 4A), consistent with the histidine ligands predicted from the sequence alignment. The iron atom of the heme group was coordinated by the imidazoles of the porin cofactor and His47 and His95 of the active site. The imidazole side chains of the two histidines coordinating the heme iron are arranged near-parallel relative to one another, at an angle of approximately 35° (Figure 4B).
The sequence alignment between MtoD and the other structurally resolved cytochromes revealed that cytochrome c552 from Nitrosomas europea had the highest amino acid sequence homology (Supplemental Figure 1). When the structure of MtoD was compared with the other available structures of bacterial monoheme c-type cytochromes, the closest structural homolog was cytochrome c552 from Hydrogenobacter thermophilus (PDB id. 1YNR). Superposition of the main chain of this cytochrome with MtoD gave an average root-mean-square-displacement of 2.59 Å (Figure 4B, Table 1). Despite the high level of secondary structure conservation there are notable structural differences between MtoD and the other known c-type cytochromes. One obvious difference is that the axial coordination of the MtoD heme is bis-Histidine, while other crystallized cytochromes have Histidine/Methionine coordination (Table 1). The class 1 cytochromes typically contain a flexible loop that covers the front of the heme, however in MtoD this region is restrained by a hydrogen bonding network that causes the formation of a β-loop and prevents the peptide sidechains from interacting with the heme propionate groups (Figures 4C,D). This causes an increase in the overall surface exposure of the MtoD heme, giving an overall exposed heme of 152 Å2 compared to 30–61 Å2 for other class 1 cytochromes. Typically the hemes of these class 1 cytochromes are exposed on one side, next to the thiolated cysteine residues, with the propionate edge being completely covered. To date the heme group of MtoD is significantly more exposed to solvent than the heme of any other structurally resolved monoheme cytochrome, suggesting that the properties of the heme are likely to be extremely susceptible to changes within the local environment.
Table 1.
Name | Class | PDB id | Axial ligands | Accesible Heme area (Å2) | RMSD (Å) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. lithotrophicus MtoD | – | 4XXL | His/His | 152.5 | – |
N. europea c552 | c552 | 1A56 | His/Met | 54.2 | 3.23 |
P. aeruginosa c551 | c551 | 451C | His/Met | 52.6 | 3.25 |
H. thermoluteolus c552 | c552 | 2D0S | His/Met | 61.3 | 2.87 |
H. thermophilus c552 | c552 | 1YNR | His/Met | 57.4 | 2.59 |
P. stutzeri c551 | c552 | 1COR | His/Met | 55.2 | 3.08 |
A. aeolicus c555 | c555 | 2ZXY | His/Met | 37.5 | 3.54 |
Six cytochromes were identified through sequence similarity to MtoD using BLAST. Structures were downloaded from the RCSB protein data bank. The root mean square displacement (RMSD) was measured using SUPERPOSE (Krissinel and Henrick, 2004). Accesible heme area was measured using a 1.4 Å probe using AREAIMOL (Shrake and Rupley, 1973).
Discussion
Autotrophic iron oxidizing bacteria face a significant bioenergetic challenge in generating both the reducing equivalents (NADH) and chemical energy (ATP) required for carbon fixation and other anabolic reactions essential for cell survival. The energy source for both NADH and ATP production is generated from the liberation of electrons obtained from the oxidation of iron at the cell surface. At pH 7.0 the redox potential of this iron couple Fe(OH)3/Fe2+ is -236 mV vs. SHE, which is low enough to allow electron transfer across the outer membrane through the MtoAB complex (Widdel et al., 1993; Liu et al., 2012). The electrons obtained from iron oxidation are required both for PMF-coupled oxygen reduction, and the reduction of NADH at the cytoplasmic membrane. At an initial potential around −236 mV the energy associated with these electrons would be sufficient to catalyze the reduction of oxygen (+816 mV), but they would not be able to reduce NAD+ to NADH (−320 mV). As a consequence electrons destined for NADH formation will have to be pumped “uphill” through different carriers before reducing NADH. The energy source for this uphill electron transfer is most likely to be obtained from the proton gradient. In A. ferrooxidans two periplasmic diheme cytochromes Cyc1 and CycA1 take electrons to either the cytochrome oxidase or the cytochrome bc1 complex, which then runs in reverse to reduce ubiquinone. These cytochromes are located in two separate operons; the rus operon contains cyc1 as well as cyc2, rusA and the genes for a cytochrome c oxidase, while the petl operon contains cycA1 and the genes for a cytochrome bc1 complex (Roger et al., 2012). In contrast the mto gene cluster of S. lithotrophicus contains the gene for only one monoheme cytochrome: mtoD, while the gene clusters that contain the genes of cytochrome bc1 and cytochrome bb3 do not contain any soluble monoheme cytochromes.
The MtoD cytochrome has a number of unusual features. Comparative analysis of the MtoD amino acid sequence with the sequences of other structurally defined class-1 cytochromes revealed that MtoD is unusual in having bis-His coordination instead of His/Met, and that the sequence around the distal ligand is not proline rich as observed for other cytochromes (Table 1 and Supplemental Figure 1). The measured redox potential of +155 mV for the MtoD heme is high for a bis-His coordinated heme and the heme group is significantly more solvent exposed than in monoheme cytochromes. It is possible that these unusual features of the MtoD heme group allow it to function as an electron donor to cytochrome bb3, cytochrome bc1 and/or CymAES−1 (Figure 5).
Previous studies on the potentials of the heme groups of MtoA indicate that they span a mid-point potential range between +30 and −350 mV (Liu et al., 2012), which is lower than the potential of MtoD and indicates that electron transfer from MtoA to MtoD would be thermodynamically favorable. This supports the hypothesis that MtoD could be the electron transfer shuttle between the outer membrane MtoAB complex and the cytochrome bb3 oxidase on the cytoplasmic membrane, allowing the efficient generation of a PMF.
A membrane bound NADH dehydrogenase is proposed to reduce NAD+ to NADH using electrons provided by the quinol pool and energy generated by the PMF (Emerson et al., 2013). Either the cytochrome bc1 complex or CymAES−1could generate quinol, using electrons supplied by MtoD (Figure 5). At +155 mV, the potential of MtoD is only slightly higher than the midpoint potential of ubiquinol (+100 mV vs. SHE) and consequently electron transfer from MtoD to cytochrome bc1 could occur in order to drive NADH production. The generation of reduced ubiquinol from cytochrome bc1 has been observed in other iron oxidizing bacteria, notably A. ferrooxidans (Elbehti et al., 2000). In this system, the two half reactions of the cytochrome bc1 complex run in reverse, causing the net transport of two protons across the cytoplasmic membrane for every ubiquinone reduced.
The role of CymAES−1 is less clear. The homologous CymA cytochrome from S. oneidensis MR-1 was shown to be specific for menaquinone, that has a midpoint potential of −70 mV vs. SHE (McMillan et al., 2012). This suggests that the measured potential of MtoD would not allow thermodynamically favorable electron transfer to CymAES−1. However, the highly exposed heme surface of MtoD is likely to be sensitive to changes in the local environment, such as those caused by protein complex formation. This may allow lowering of the MtoD midpoint potential on association with CymAES−1, facilitating electron exchange and menaquinone reduction.
In summary, the structure and electrochemical properties of MtoD are consistent with its possible role as an electron shuttle between MtoAB on the outer membrane and a range of potential electron acceptors on the inner membrane. However, a full biochemical analysis will be required to verify the true redox partners and confirm the pathway of electron transfer through this iron oxidizing bacterium.
Author contributions
CB, ME, ML, and LS carried out data acquisition and analysis. CB, ME, JB, DR, TC carried out data analysis and interpretation. CB, ME, ML, LS, JB, DR, TC drafted the manuscript. CB, ME, JB, DR, TC revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/K009885/1, BB/L023733/1) and a DTP studentship to ML. the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) through the Subsurface Biogeochemical Research (SBR) program, and is a contribution of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) SBR SFA. PNNL is operated for DOE by Battelle under contract DE-AC05-76RLO1830. We are grateful to Prof. Jim Fredrickson and John Zachara for useful discussion.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00332/abstract
References
- Adams P. D., Afonine P. V., Bunkoczi G., Chen V. B., Davis I. W., Echols N., et al. (2010). PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221. 10.1107/S0907444909052925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bamford V. A., Angove H. C., Seward H. E., Thomson A. J., Cole J. A., Butt J. N., et al. (2002). Structure and spectroscopy of the periplasmic cytochrome c nitrite reductase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 41, 2921–2931. 10.1021/bi015765d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Berry E. A., Trumpower B. L. (1987). Simultaneous determination of Hemes-a, Hemes-B, and Hemes-C from pyridine hemochrome spectra. Anal. Biochem. 161, 1–15. 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90643-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bertini I., Cavallaro G., Rosato A. (2006). Cytochrome c: occurrence and functions. Chem. Rev. 106, 90–115. 10.1021/cr050241v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bird L. J., Bonnefoy V., Newman D. K. (2011). Bioenergetic challenges of microbial iron metabolisms. Trends Microbiol. 19, 330–340. 10.1016/j.tim.2011.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonnefoy V., Holmes D. S. (2012). Genomic insights into microbial iron oxidation and iron uptake strategies in extremely acidic environments. Environ. Microbiol. 14, 1597–1611. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02626.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown P. H., Schuck P. (2006). Macromolecular size-and-shape distributions by sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation. Biophys. J. 90, 4651–4661. 10.1529/biophysj.106.081372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elbehti A., Brasseur G., Lemesle-Meunier D. (2000). First evidence for existence of an uphill electron transfer through the bc(1) and NADH-Q oxidoreductase complexes of the acidophilic obligate chemolithotrophic ferrous ion-oxidizing bacterium Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. J. Bacteriol. 182, 3602–3606. 10.1128/JB.182.12.3602-3606.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emerson D., Field E. K., Chertkov O., Davenport K. W., Goodwin L., Munk C., et al. (2013). Comparative genomics of freshwater Fe-oxidizing bacteria: implications for physiology, ecology, and systematics. Front. Microbiol. 4:254. 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emerson D., Moyer C. (1997). Isolation and characterization of novel iron-oxidizing bacteria that grow at circumneutral pH. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 4784–4792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferguson S. J., Ingledew W. J. (2008). Energetic problems faced by micro-organisms growing or surviving on parsimonious energy sources and at acidic pH: I. Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans as a paradigm. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1777, 1471–1479. 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hallbeck L., Stahl F., Pedersen K. (1993). Phylogeny and phenotypic characterization of the stalk-forming and iron-oxidizing bacterium Gallionella-ferruginea. J. Gen. Microbiol. 139, 1531–1535. 10.1099/00221287-139-7-1531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hartshorne R. S., Reardon C. L., Ross D., Nuester J., Clarke T. A., Gates A. J., et al. (2009). Characterization of an electron conduit between bacteria and the extracellular environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 22169–22174. 10.1073/pnas.0900086106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hedrich S., Schlomann M., Johnson D. B. (2011). The iron-oxidizing proteobacteria. Microbiology 157, 1551–1564. 10.1099/mic.0.045344-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Konhauser K. O., Kappler A., Roden E. E. (2011). Iron in microbial metabolisms. Elements 7, 89–93 10.2113/gselements.7.2.89 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Krissinel E., Henrick K. (2004). Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2256–2268. 10.1107/S0907444904026460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu J., Wang Z. M., Belchik S. M., Edwards M. J., Liu C. X., Kennedy D. W., et al. (2012). Identification and characterization of MtoA: a decaheme c-type cytochrome of the neutrophilic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacterium Sideroxydans lithotrophicus ES-1. Front. Microbiol. 3:37. 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McMillan D. G., Marritt S. J., Butt J. N., Jeuken L. J. (2012). Menaquinone-7 is specific cofactor in tetraheme quinol dehydrogenase CymA. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 14215–14225. 10.1074/jbc.M112.348813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mishra D., Rhee Y. H. (2014). Microbial leaching of metals from solid industrial wastes. J. Microbiol. 52, 1–7. 10.1007/s12275-014-3532-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murshudov G. N., Skubak P., Lebedev A. A., Pannu N. S., Steiner R. A., Nicholls R. A., et al. (2011). REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 67, 355–367. 10.1107/S0907444911001314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petersen T. N., Brunak S., von Heijne G., Nielsen H. (2011). SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods 8, 785–786. 10.1038/nmeth.1701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pitcher R. S., Watmough N. J. (2004). The bacterial cytochrome cbb(3) oxidases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1655, 388–399. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2003.09.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rawlings D. E., Tributsch H., Hansford G. S. (1999). Reasons why ‘Leptospirillum’-like species rather than Thiobacillus ferrooxidans are the dominant iron-oxidizing bacteria in many commercial processes for the biooxidation of pyrite and related ores. Microbiology 145, 5–13. 10.1099/13500872-145-1-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roger M., Castelle C., Guiral M., Infossi P., Lojou E., Giudici-Orticoni M. T., et al. (2012). Mineral respiration under extreme acidic conditions: from a supramolecular organization to a molecular adaptation in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 40, 1324–1329. 10.1042/BST20120141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shrake A., Rupley J. A. (1973). Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms - lysozyme and insulin. J. Mol. Biol. 79, 351–371. 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90011-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White G. F., Shi Z., Shi L., Wang Z. M., Dohnalkova A. C., Marshall M. J., et al. (2013). Rapid electron exchange between surface-exposed bacterial cytochromes and Fe(III) minerals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 6346–6351. 10.1073/pnas.1220074110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Widdel F., Schnell S., Heising S., Ehrenreich A., Assmus B., Schink B. (1993). Ferrous iron oxidation by anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria. Nature 362, 834–836 10.1038/362834a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Winter G. (2010). xia2: an expert system for macromolecular crystallography data reduction. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 43, 186–190 10.1107/S0021889809045701 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.