Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Taylor & Francis Open Select logoLink to Taylor & Francis Open Select
. 2014 Oct 28;28(14):1621–1632. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.964676

Endocan, a putative endothelial cell marker, is elevated in preeclampsia, decreased in acute pyelonephritis, and unchanged in other obstetrical syndromes

Henry Adekola a,b, Roberto Romero a,c,d,*, Piya Chaemsaithong a,b, Steven J Korzeniewski a,b,d, Zhong Dong a,b, Lami Yeo a,b, Sonia S Hassan a,b, Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa a,b
PMCID: PMC4412749  NIHMSID: NIHMS638019  PMID: 25211383

Abstract

Objective: Endocan, a dermatan sulphate proteoglycan produced by endothelial cells, is considered a biomarker for endothelial cell activation/dysfunction. Preeclampsia is characterized by systemic vascular inflammation, and endothelial cell activation/dysfunction. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to determine whether: (1) plasma endocan concentrations in preeclampsia differ from those in uncomplicated pregnancies; (2) changes in plasma endocan concentration relate to the severity of preeclampsia, and whether these changes are specific or observed in other obstetrical syndromes such as small-for-gestational age (SGA), fetal death (FD), preterm labor (PTL) or preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM); (3) a correlation exists between plasma concentration of endocan and angiogenic (placental growth factor or PlGF)/anti-angiogenic factors (soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor or sVEGFR-1, and soluble endoglin or sEng) among pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia; and (4) plasma endocan concentrations in patients with preeclampsia and acute pyelonephritis (both conditions in which there is endothelial cell activation) differ.

Method: This cross-sectional study included the following groups: (1) uncomplicated pregnancy (n = 130); (2) preeclampsia (n = 102); (3) pregnant women without preeclampsia who delivered an SGA neonate (n = 51); (4) FD (n = 49); (5) acute pyelonephritis (AP; n = 35); (6) spontaneous PTL (n = 75); and (7) preterm PROM (n = 64). Plasma endocan concentrations were determined in all groups, and PIGF, sEng and VEGFR-1 plasma concentrations were measured by ELISA in the preeclampsia group.

Results: (1) Women with preeclampsia had a significantly higher median plasma endocan concentration than those with uncomplicated pregnancies (p = 0.004); (2) among women with preeclampsia, the median plasma endocan concentration did not differ significantly according to disease severity (p = 0.1), abnormal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry (p = 0.7) or whether diagnosis was made before or after 34 weeks gestational age (p = 0.3); (3) plasma endocan concentration in women with preeclampsia correlated positively with plasma anti-angiogenic factor concentrations [sVEGFR-1: Spearman rho 0.34, p = 0.001 and sEng: Spearman rho 0.30, p = 0.003]; (4) pregnancies complicated by acute pyelonephritis with bacteremia had a lower median plasma endocan concentration than pregnancies complicated by acute pyelonephritis without bacteremia (p = 0.004), as well as uncomplicated pregnancies (p = 0.001); and (5) there was no significant difference in the median plasma endocan concentration between uncomplicated pregnancies and those complicated by FD, delivery of an SGA neonate, PTL or preterm PROM (other members of the “great obstetrical syndromes”; each p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Median maternal plasma endocan concentrations were higher preeclampsia and lower in acute pyelonephritis with bacteremia than in uncomplicated pregnancy. No significant difference was observed in the median plasma endocan concentration between other great obstetrical syndromes and uncomplicated pregnancies. The difference in the direction of change of endocan in preeclampsia and acute pyelonephritis with bacteremia may be consistent with the view that both disease entities differ in pathogenic mechanisms, despite their associations with systemic vascular inflammation and endothelial cell activation/dysfunction.

Keywords: Endothelial cell activation, endothelial dysfunction, fetal death, preterm labor, small-for-gestational age, soluble endoglin, soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1

Introduction

The traditional view of the pathogenesis of preeclampsia is that uteroplacental ischemia induces the production of soluble factors (or toxins) that, when released into the maternal circulation, are responsible for the clinical manifestations of the disease [1–9]. These factors are thought to cause intravascular inflammation [10–16], endothelial cell dysfunction [17–25], increased thrombin generation [26–35] and platelet aggregation [3,28,35–39].

Generalized endothelial cell activation/dysfunction is considered to be central to the pathophysiology of preeclampsia [9,17]. Considerable effort has been made to identify circulating markers of endothelial cell activation/dysfunction in the circulation of normal pregnant women and those with preeclampsia – this has included coagulation factors produced by endothelial cells, such as Von Willebrand factor [40–44], cellular “cements” (e.g. cellular fibronectin, which is also almost exclusively located in the endothelium) [45–56], endothelial cell adhesion molecules (e.g. E-selectin and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1) [57–67] and anti-endothelial cell antibodies [68–70]. However, none of these makers have been proven to be specific to preeclampsia, and can be elevated in other conditions [71–80]. Thus, a major challenge has been the to identify a biomarker specific to endothelial cell activation/dysfunction and preeclampsia.

Endocan, also known as endothelial specific molecule-1 (ESM-1), is a proteoglycan detectable in the circulation that has been proposed to be a new endothelial cell marker. This protein is elevated in serum of patients with sepsis who have endothelial cell activation/dysfunction [81,82]. Similarly, the serum concentrations of endocan are elevated in lung, breast, hepatocellular [83] and renal cancers [84–86] as well as acute myeloid leukemia [87], conditions associated with endothelial activation/dysfunction [72,74,76,88–94].

The objectives of this study were to determine: (1) whether plasma endocan concentrations in PE differ from those of uncomplicated pregnancy; (2) whether changes the plasma endocan concentration relate to the severity of preeclampsia, and whether these changes are specific or observed in other obstetrical syndromes such as small-for-gestational age (SGA), fetal death (FD), preterm labor (PTL) or preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM); (3) if a correlation exists between the plasma concentration of endocan and angiogenic/anti-angiogenic factors among pregnancies complicated by PE; and (4) whether plasma endocan concentrations in patients with preeclampsia and acute pyelonephritis (both conditions in which there is endothelial cell activation) differ.

Materials and methods

Study design

A cross-sectional study was designed to include patients in the following groups: (1) uncomplicated pregnancy (n = 130); (2) preeclampsia (n = 102); (3) pregnant women without pre-eclampsia or hypertension who delivered a small-for-gestational age neonate (n = 51); (4) fetal death (n = 49); (5) acute pyelonephritis (n = 35); (6) preterm labor with intact membranes (n = 75); and (7) preterm PROM (n = 64). All participants provided written informed consent for the collection and use of samples for research purposes under the protocols approved by, the Institutional Review Boards of Wayne State University and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS).

Clinical definitions

Preeclampsia was defined as new onset hypertension (systolic and/or diastolic blood pressure of ≥140 and/or ≥90 mm Hg) that developed after 20 weeks of gestation, measured on at least two occasions, 4 h to 1 week apart and proteinuria (≥300 mg in a 24-h urine collection, or two random urine specimens obtained 4 h to 1 week apart containing ≥1 + protein by dipstick) [95]. Severe PE was diagnosed according to criteria proposed by the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) [95,96]. Early and late-onset preeclampsia was defined as cases diagnosed before and after 34 weeks of gestation, respectively [97].

The uncomplicated pregnancy group comprised of women with: (1) no medical, obstetrical or surgical complications; (2) a singleton gestation; (3) no labor; and (4) a normal term (≥37 weeks) infant delivered at term whose birth weight was between the 10th and 90th percentile for gestational age [98]. Acute pyelonephritis was diagnosed in the presence of fever (temperature ≥38 °C), clinical signs or symptoms of an upper urinary tract infection (e.g. flank pain, costovertebral angle tenderness), pyuria and a positive urine culture [99,100]. An SGA neonate was defined as birth weight <10th percentile for gestational age [98]. Fetal death was defined as death of the fetus after 20 weeks of gestation, confirmed by ultrasound. All fetal deaths were unexplained. Spontaneous PTL was defined by the presence of preterm labor leading to preterm delivery. Pre-term PPROM was diagnosed as amniorrhexis in preterm gestations that were followed by preterm delivery.

Maternal plasma concentrations of endocan, placental growth factor, sVEGFR-1 and endoglin

Maternal blood was collected into tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), centrifuged and stored at −70 °C until assayed. Maternal plasma concentrations of intact endocan were measured with an immunoassay following the manufacturers’ instructions (USCN Life Science Inc., Wuhan, Hubei, PRC or Cloud-Clone Corp., Houston, TX). Maternal plasma concentrations of placenta growth factor (PIGF), soluble endoglin (sEng) and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (sVEGFR)-1 were determined by sensitive and specific immunoassays obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). The sensitivity and coefficients of variation for these assays are described in Table 1. Validation of these assays has been previously described [101].

Table 1. Sensitivities and coefficients of variation of the assays used in this study.

Analytes Sensitivity Inter-assay coefficient of variation (%) Intra-assay coefficient of variation (%)
Endocan (ng/ml) 89.5 6.2 10.2
Soluble endoglin (ng/ml) 0.08 2.0 4.0
Soluble vascular endothelial  growth factor receptor  (pg/ml) 16.97 1.4 3.9
Placenta growth factor  (pg/ml) 9.52 6.02 4.8
Open in a new tab

Doppler velocimetry

Color Doppler was used to identify blood vessels, and spectral Doppler to calculate Doppler indices in the uterine arteries. The examinations were performed at the time of diagnosis according to methods previously described [15,102,103]. The uterine artery resistance index (RI) was used as a measure of vascular impedance in the uterine circulation. A mean RI (average of left and right) of < or ≥95th percentile for gestational age was used to determine normal and abnormal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry, respectively [104].

Statistical analysis

Normality of data was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and visual plot inspection. The Kruskal–Wallis test with post-hoc analysis by Mann–Whitney U-tests was used to compare continuous variables. Comparison of proportions was performed using χ 2 or Fisher’s exact tests. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationship between plasma endocan, angiogenic (PIGF) and anti-angiogenic factor [(sEng and sVEGFR)-1] concentrations as well as maternal age, gestational age at blood draw, gestational age at delivery and neonatal birth weight. General linear models were constructed to examine the relevance of potential confounders including gestational age at venipuncture, maternal age, African American race and history of smoking status. Endocan concentrations were log-transformed. Multivariable analysis also controlled for the false discovery rate (FDR) in light of the performance of multiple tests. A probability value of <0.05 (2-tailed) was considered significant. Statistical tests were performed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

The demographic, clinical and obstetric characteristics of the study population are displayed in Table 2. Endocan was detected in the maternal plasma of all patients. Among women with uncomplicated pregnancies, maternal plasma endocan concentrations did not correlate with maternal age (p = 0.5), gestational age at venipuncture (p = 0.2), gestational age at delivery (p = 0.9) or birth weight of the neonate (p = 0.8).

Table 2. Clinical and obstetric characteristics of normal and complicated pregnancies.

  Uncomplicated pregnancy (n = 130) Pre-eclampsia (n = 102) SGA (n = 51) Fetal death (n = 49) Acute pyelonephritis (n = 35) PTL (n = 75) PPROM (n = 64) p value
Age (years) 25 (21–29) 23.5 (19.8–30) 24 (20–29) 26 (20–30) 22 (19–25) 22.5 (19–26) 26 (21–32) 0.002
Nulliparity (%) 35 (26.9%) 63 (61.8%) 26 (50.9%) 19 (38.8%) 12 (34.3%) 39 (40.6%) 17 (26.6%) <0.001
Race
 African American 102 (78.5%) 83 (81.4%) 44 (86.3%) 42 (85.7%) 27 (77.1%) 60 (80%) 57 (89.1%) 0.55
 Caucasian 15 (11.5%) 11 (10.8%) 4 (7.8%) 3 (6.1%) 5 (14.3%) 9 (12.3%) 6 (9.4%)  
 Hispanic 7 (5.4%) 5 (4.9%) 1 (2.0%) 3 (6.1%) 3 (8.6%) 3 (4%) 1 (1.6%)  
 Others 6 (4.6%) 3 (2.9%) 2 (3.9%) 1 (2%) 0 1 (1.3%) 0  
Smoking 22 (16.9%) 14 (13.7%) 15 (29.4%) 16 (32.7%) 5 (14.3%) 27 (28.1%) 34 (53.1%) <0.001
GA at venipuncture  (weeks) 38 (31.4–39.1) 36.1 (31.5–38.6) 36.9 (32.7–38.4) 31 (24.8–36.6) 31.4 (25.3–36.4) 29.9 (25.1–32.3) 30.6 (27.6–32.1) <0.001
GA at delivery  (weeks) 39.3 (38.4–40.3) 36.1 (32.3–38.6) 37.1 (33.6–38.6) 31 (25.9–36.7) 39.4 (38.4–40.7) 30 (25–34) 31.6 (29.3–33.1) <0.001
Birth weight (g) 3352 (3118–3633) 2280 (1455–2835) 2050 (1500–2380) 1380 (535–2263) 3210 (2690–3600) 1785 (865–2623.8) 1580 (1142–2055) <0.001
Open in a new tab

Data presented as median (interquartile range) or number (percentage). GA, gestational age; SGA, small for gestational age; PTL, spontaneous preterm labor with intact membranes; PPROM, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.

Maternal plasma endocan concentrations in pre-eclampsia

The median plasma endocan concentration (ng/ml) in patients with preeclampsia was significantly higher than that of women with uncomplicated pregnancies (22.5, IQR 13.8–44.4 versus 18.2, IQR 10.6–28.0; p = 0.004; Figure 1). Subgroup analysis performed among women with preeclampsia revealed that the median plasma endocan concentration (ng/ml) did not significantly differ according to: disease severity (mild preeclampsia 17.5, IQR 10.5–34.1 versus severe preeclampsia 22.6, IQR 15.3–45.6; p = 0.1); the presence of abnormal uterine artery Doppler velocimetry (normal: 21.4, IQR 14.2–51.0 versus abnormal: 22.3, IQR 13.3–41.0; p = 0.7); or if diagnosis was made before or after 34 weeks gestational age (early onset: 24.0, IQR 17.1–45.0 versus late-onset: 22.0, IQR 12.0–43.0; p = 0.3). Maternal plasma endocan concentration correlated positively with plasma sVEGFR-1 (Spearman’s rho 0.34; p = 0.001) and sEng (Spearman’s rho 0.30; p = 0.003), but not with the concentration of PlGF (p = 0.3).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

The median plasma endocan concentration in uncomplicated pregnancy, preeclampsia, pregnancies complicated by the delivery of a small-for-gestational age newborn (SGA), fetal death, acute pyelonephritis, preterm labor and preterm pre-mature rupture of membranes (PPROM). There were significant differences among groups; p = 0.01. The median plasma endocan concentration (ng/ml) between uncomplicated pregnancies; 18.2 (IQR 10.6–28.0) and other groups were as follows: preeclampsia (22.5, IQR 13.8–44.4; p = 0.004), SGA (19.8, IQR 10.8–28.8; p = 0.4); fetal death (19.5, IQR 11.3–39.2; p = 0.3); acute pyelonephritis (13.4, IQR 8.3–29.6; p = 0.2); preterm labor (17.4, IQR 11.8–29.7; p = 0.7); and preterm PROM (15.8, IQR 10.0–26.0; p = 0.5).

Maternal plasma endocan concentration in pregnancies with acute pyelonephritis

The median plasma endocan concentration (ng/ml) was lower in pregnancies complicated by acute pyelonephritis than in uncomplicated pregnancies, but this was not statistically significant (13.4, IQR 8.3–29.6 versus 18.2, IQR 10.6–28.0; p = 0.2). There was no significant difference observed between the median plasma endocan concentration (ng/ml) in pregnancies complicated by acute pyelonephritis without bacteremia and uncomplicated pregnancies (18.1, IQR 9.5–35.2 versus 18.2, IQR 10.6–28.0; p = 0.7; Figure 2). The median plasma concentration of endocan (ng/ml) in pregnancies complicated by acute pyelonephritis with bacteremia was significantly lower than that of those without bacteremia (8.4, IQR 4.5–13.8 versus 18.1, IQR 9.5–35.2; p = 0.004; Figure 2) and lower than that of women with uncomplicated pregnancies (8.4, IQR 4.5–13.8 versus 18.2, IQR 10.6–28.0; p = 0.001). The prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) among pregnancies complicated by acute pyelonephritis in this study was 2.9% (1/35). The plasma endocan concentration of the patient who developed ARDS was 13.4 ng/ml.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

The median plasma endocan concentration of uncomplicated pregnancies, pregnancies complicated by acute pyelonephritis without bacteremia and pregnancies complicated by acute pyelonephritis with bacteremia. There was significant difference in the median plasma endocan concentration (ng/ml) among groups (p = 0.001). Pregnancies complicated by acute pyelonephritis with bacteremia (8.4, IQR 4.5–13.8) had a lower median plasma concentration of endocan than those without bacteremia (18.1, IQR 9.5–35.2; p = 0.005) and lower than those with uncomplicated pregnancies (18.2, IQR 10.6–28.0; p = 0.001). There was no significant different in the median plasma endocan concentration between pregnancies complicated by acute pyelonephritis without bacteremia (18.1, IQR 9.5–35.2) and those with uncomplicated pregnancy (18.2, IQR 10.6–28.0; p = 0.7). Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-tests were performed for comparisons.

The median maternal plasma concentration of endocan (ng/ml) was significantly lower in patients with acute pyelonephritis in patients with preeclampsia (13.4, IQR 8.3–29.6 versus 22.5, IQR 13.8–44.4; p = 0.005).

Maternal plasma endocan concentration in fetal death, SGA, preterm labor and preterm PROM

There were no significant differences in the median plasma endocan concentrations (ng/ml) among women with uncomplicated pregnancies (18.2, IQR 10.6–28.0) and those with FD (19.5, IQR 11.3–39.2; p = 0.3), delivery of an SGA neonate (19.8, IQR 10.8–28.8; p = 0.4), spontaneous PTL (17.4, IQR 11.8–29.7; p = 0.7) or preterm PPROM (15.8, IQR 10.0–26.0; p = 0.5; Figure 1).

Multivariable adjustment with correction for the FDR did not alter the unadjusted determinations of statistical significance. Log endocan concentrations were significantly higher among women with preeclampsia than in those with uncomplicated pregnancies (p < 0.01), adjusting for gestational age at venipuncture, maternal age, nulliparity, race, smoking status and BMI. Similarly adjusting for potential confounders, log endocan concentrations were significantly lower among women with acute pyelonephritis with bacteremia than among those with acute pyelonephritis without bacteremia (p < 0.01) or uncomplicated pregnancies (p < 0.01).

Discussion

Principal findings of the study

(1) The median plasma endocan concentration was higher in preeclampsia than in uncomplicated pregnancies; however, there was no relationship between the plasma concentration of endocan and the severity of preeclampsia; (2) there was a positive correlation between the plasma concentration of endocan and sVEGFR-1 and sEng plasma concentrations among women with preeclampsia; (3) contrary to what was expected, the median plasma concentration of endocan was lower in patients with acute pyelonephritis than in those with preeclampsia; a subgroup analysis demonstrated a significantly lower median endocan concentration in acute pyelonephritis with bacteremia than in those without bacteremia and in those with uncomplicated pregnancies; and (4) endocan was not elevated in other obstetrical syndromes, such as fetal death, SGA, preterm labor and preterm PROM, suggesting that an elevation of maternal plasma endocan occurs selectively in patients with preeclampsia.

Endothelial cell activation and dysfunction in health and disease

The endothelium is a monolayer that lines all blood vessels. The functions of the endothelium are to maintain vascular tone, prevent cell adhesion, promote thromboresistance and regulate smooth muscle vessel wall proliferation [105,106]. Many of these properties are mediated by nitric oxide (NO), which is produced by the endothelium [from l-arginine by the action of endothelial NO synthase (also called eNOS)] [107–116]. This gas diffuses to the vascular smooth muscle cells and activates guanylate cyclase, which leads to cGMP-mediated vasodilatation [106,107,117]. Physiologic regulators of eNOS expression include shear stress [118–122], but other factors can activate this enzyme, including bradykinin, adenosine, vascular endothelial growth factor and serotonin [112,123–128].

The concept of endothelial cell activation was formulated by investigators examining the behavior of endothelial cells in culture, and was coined to describe the increased adhesive properties of these cells to white blood cells when endothelial cells are exposed to biomechanical stimuli [129–131] or cytokines [132–138]. The molecular basis for the increased adhesiveness was the expression of cell surface adhesion molecules, such as VCAM-1, ICAM-1 and endothelial cell adhesion molecule (also known as E-selectin or ELAM) [139,140]. Nitric oxide generated from endothelium (as a result of the activity of nitric oxide synthase) can reduce endothelial cell activation through inhibition of NFκ-B [139,141–143].

The term “endothelial cell dysfunction” was introduced by physiologists and cardiologists who were originally studying impaired endothelial cell-dependent relaxation, and demonstrated that this feature was present in patients with essential hypertension [144]. Endothelial cell dysfunction has been defined as decreased synthesis, release and/or activity of endothelium-derived nitric oxide induced by hypercholesterolemia [140,145], smoking [140,146–148] or oxidative stress [140,149–152].

Endothelial cell activation may lead to endothelial cell dysfunction [140], and both can induce vasoconstriction, platelet aggregation, leukocyte adhesion, low-density lipoprotein oxidation and matrix metalloproteinase protein activation [140]. Thus, endothelial cell activation/dysfunction can lead to atherosclerosis/vascular disease [153–156]. Pregnancy represents a physiological state in which there appears to be endothelial cell activation as a consequence of physiologic intravascular inflammation [157]. It is unclear if endothelial cell activation and dysfunction have different molecular fingerprints; indeed, they appear to coexist. Preeclampsia is considered to be characterized by endothelial cell activation/dysfunction [17–24], and this condition is associated with a significant increase in the maternal circulating concentrations of sE-selectin [57,58,60,158,159] and sVCAM-1 [57,60,158,160,161], which are markers of endothelial cell activation/dysfunction [136,162]. However, there is no increase in the concentration of sICAM-1 and sPECAM-1 [57,60,163,164], indicating that there are some unique features of endothelial cell activation/dysfunction in preeclampsia. When assessing the profile of adhesion molecules, we have found that patients with acute pyelonephritis have an increase in sICAM-1, sE-selectin and sVCAM-1 [60], suggesting that there are subtle differences in the adhesion molecule profile in patients with pyelonephritis and preeclampsia, both of which are characterized by intravascular inflammation [12,157].

What is endocan?

Endocan is a dermatan sulphate proteoglycan first isolated from the human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) cDNA library by Lassalle et al. [165]. This protein is found in endothelial cells and in the epithelium the lung and kidney [166]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-1β can up-regulate mRNA expression of endocan in endothelial cells [167]. Endocan can inhibit the interaction between intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and the integrin (lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1) LFA-1 on leukocytes [168,169], then modulate several leukocyte functions, including adhesion to the endothelium and transmigration [168,170,171]. In addition, endocan can stimulate endothelial cell proliferation and migration induced by epidermal growth factor (EGF), Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) A and-C [172–174]. This has been attributed to the dermatan sulfate moieties of endocan [172,173,175].

We decided to study the behavior of endocan in normal pregnancy and pregnancy complications due to the claim that this was an endothelial cell marker [81]. Previous reports indicated that serum endocan concentrations were elevated in patients with sepsis and septic shock [81]. Sepsis is considered to represent a state in which there is endothelial cell activation/dysfunction. In these conditions, activated leukocytes roll, adhere and extravasate following interaction between the integrin leukocyte function-associated antigen (LFA-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1) on surface of these activated leukocytes [176].

Plasma endocan concentration is increased in pre-eclampsia

`We found that plasma endocan concentrations was increased in patients with preeclampsia, and this increase correlated with the increase in plasma anti-angiogenic factors concentrations, but not with the severity of disease. Preeclampsia is characterized by excessive maternal systemic vascular inflammation, as demonstrated by the phenotypic and metabolic characteristics of neutrophils and monocytes [10,12,177,178], as well as the increased concentration of cytokines [63,65,179–197], chemokines [63,65,198–203], other inflammatory mediators [63,185,189,190,192,204–213], as well as acute phase protein reactants [193,204,214–225] and the decreased concentration of negative acute phase protein reactants [225,226]. The increased cytokine concentration in preeclampsia may be responsible for the elevation in endocan.

The relationship between the increased concentrations of maternal plasma endocan and that of anti-angiogenic factors (sVEGFR-1 and endoglin) in preeclampsia suggests that there may be convergence of the inflammatory process, and the abnormal anti-angiogenic profile observed in the disease [227]. The lack of correlation between the concentrations of PlGF and endocan is unexpected, given that VEGF (another angiogenic factor in the same family as PIGF) can stimulate endocan mRNA expression and release from endothelial cells [228].

Plasma endocan concentration is lower in pregnant women with acute pyelonephritis

Scherpereel et al. [81] demonstrated that the serum endocan concentrations in patients with sepsis and a systemic inflammatory response were significantly higher than that of non-pregnant patients. Our findings herein are different, as we observed that the median plasma endocan concentration was lower in pregnancies complicated by acute pyelonephritis than in non-pregnant patients. This is a puzzling observation, given that our systematic studies of the behavior of cytokines [229], chemokines [230], complement [231,232] in acute pyelonephritis and preeclampsia suggest that both conditions are associated with a pro-inflammatory state. However, studies of the transcriptome of peripheral blood in patients with preeclampsia [233] and pyelonephritis [234] suggest that the molecular details of the inflammatory response differ. Further work is required to understand the similarities and differences in the systemic and local inflammatory response in these two conditions. Interestingly, systemic infection in non-pregnant subjects is associated with an increase in the concentration of sVEGFR-1 in non-pregnant animals [235] and humans [236]. However, in pregnant subjects with acute pyelonephritis, the median plasma concentrations of anti-angiogenic factors (VEGFR-1 and sEng), similar to endocan, are not significantly higher than that of uncomplicated pregnancy [229]. In addition, endocan behaves in a different direction of change in preeclampsia compared to the changes observed in acute pyelonephritis with bacteremia. This is consistent with the view that there may be a fundamental difference in the nature of the inflammatory response in microbial- and “danger signal”-induced inflammation [237].

TNF-α, which stimulates the production of endocan [167], is increased in the peripheral blood of patients with sepsis [238–241]. In addition to demonstrating a high concentration of TNF-α in plasma during maternal sepsis [242], our group also showed a higher concentration of this cytokine in pregnancies complicated by acute pyelonephritis than uncomplicated pregnancies [229]. Therefore, a lower plasma endocan concentration in pregnancies complicated by acute pyelonephritis as a whole, and especially those complicated by bacteremia, was unexpected.

One study reported that, among patients with major trauma, those with lower circulating concentrations of endocan are at increased risk for acute lung injury supporting a protective effect of this protein [243]. The presence of endocan may inhibit leukocyte recruitment, and this protects against lung injury [168]. There was no evidence in our study that patients with pyelonephritis had a higher rate of acute lung injury, although it is well-known that pregnant women with pyelonephritis are at an increased risk for ARDS [244–249].

Strengths and limitations

This is the first study to focus on the changes in plasma concentrations of endocan in preeclampsia, acute pyelonephritis and other “great obstetrical syndromes”. The cross-sectional nature of this study does not enable us to make inferences about temporal changes before diagnosis of the diseases.

Conclusion

Maternal plasma endocan concentrations were higher in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and lower in pregnancies complicated by acute pyelonephritis with bacteremia when compared to uncomplicated pregnancies. Patients with SGA, fetal death, preterm labor or preterm PROM did not have demonstrable changes in maternal plasma concentrations of endocan when compared to uncomplicated pregnancies.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. This research was supported, in part, by the Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH); and, in part, with Federal funds from NICHD, NIH under Contract No. HHSN275201300006C.

References

  1. Young J. The aetiology of eclampsia and albuminuria and their relation to accidental haemorrhage: an anatomical and experimental investigation. Proc R Soc Med. 1914;7:307–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Page EW. On the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1972;79:883–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1972.tb12184.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Romero R, Lockwood C, Oyarzun E, et al. Toxemia: new concepts in an old disease. Semin Perinatol. 1988;12:302–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Redman CW, Sargent IL. Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia. Science. 2005;308:1592–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1111726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Roberts JM, Gammill HS. Preeclampsia: recent insights. Hypertension. 2005;46:1243–9. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000188408.49896.c5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sibai B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2005;365:785–99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17987-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lindheimer MD, Roberts JM, Cunningham GC, et al. Introduction, history, controversies and definitions. In: Lindheimer MD, Roberts JM, Cunningham GC, editors. Chesley’s hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. San Diego: Elsevier; 2009. pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar]
  8. Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, et al. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2010;376:631–44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60279-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Yeo L, et al. Pre-eclampsia part 1: current understanding of its pathophysiology. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014;10:466–80. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2014.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sacks GP, Studena K, Sargent K, et al. Normal pregnancy and preeclampsia both produce inflammatory changes in peripheral blood leukocytes akin to those of sepsis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:80–6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70254-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Redman CW, Sacks GP, Sargent IL. Preeclampsia: an excessive maternal inflammatory response to pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:499–506. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70239-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gervasi MT, Chaiworapongsa T, Pacora P, et al. Phenotypic and metabolic characteristics of monocytes and granulocytes in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:792–7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Redman CW, Sargent IL. Pre-eclampsia, the placenta and the maternal systemic inflammatory response – a review. Placenta. 2003;24:S21–7. doi: 10.1053/plac.2002.0930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Redman CW, Sargent IL. Preeclampsia and the systemic inflammatory response. Semin Nephrol. 2004;24:565–70. doi: 10.1016/s0270-9295(04)00127-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Korzeniewski SJ, et al. Maternal plasma concentrations of angiogenic/antiangiogenic factors in the third trimester of pregnancy to identify the patient at risk for stillbirth at or near term and severe late preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:287.e1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bouwland-Both MI, Steegers EA, Lindemans J, et al. Maternal soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, placental growth factor, plasminogen activator inhibitor-2, and folate concentrations and early fetal size: the Generation R study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:121.e1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Roberts JM, Taylor RN, Musci TJ, et al. Preeclampsia: an endothelial cell disorder. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:1200–4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90665-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Roberts JM, Taylor RN, Goldfien A. Clinical and biochemical evidence of endothelial cell dysfunction in the pregnancy syndrome preeclampsia. Am J Hypertens. 1991;4:700–8. doi: 10.1093/ajh/4.8.700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Friedman SA, Schiff E, Emeis JJ, et al. Biochemical corroboration of endothelial involvement in severe preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:202–3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90113-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lyall F, Greer IA. The vascular endothelium in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Rev Reprod. 1996;1:107–16. doi: 10.1530/ror.0.0010107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Roberts JM. Endothelial dysfunction in preeclampsia. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1998;16:5–15. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1016248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Taylor RN, de Groot CJ, Cho YK, et al. Circulating factors as markers and mediators of endothelial cell dysfunction in preeclampsia. Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1998;16:17–31. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1016249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cindrova-Davies T. Gabor than award lecture 2008: pre-eclampsia – from placental oxidative stress to maternal endothelial dysfunction. Placenta. 2009;30:S55–65. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2008.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lamarca B. Endothelial dysfunction. An important mediator in the pathophysiology of hypertension during pre-eclampsia. Minerva Ginecol. 2012;64:309–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Sandvik MK, Leirgul E, Nygard O, et al. Preeclampsia in healthy women and endothelial dysfunction 10 years later. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:569.e1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cunningham FG, Pritchard JA. Hematologic considerations of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Semin Perinatol. 1978;2:29–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Weenink GH, Treffers PE, Vijn P, et al. Antithrombin III levels in preeclampsia correlate with maternal and fetal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148:1092–7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90634-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Romero R, Mazor M, Lockwood CJ, et al. Clinical significance, prevalence, and natural history of thrombocytopenia in pregnancy-induced hypertension. Am J Perinatol. 1989;6:32–8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. de Boer K, ten Cate JW, Sturk A, et al. Enhanced thrombin generation in normal and hypertensive pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:95–100. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90096-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Cadroy Y, Grandjean H, Pichon J, et al. Evaluation of six markers of haemostatic system in normal pregnancy and pregnancy complicated by hypertension or pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:416–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15264.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chaiworapongsa T, Yoshimatsu J, Espinoza J, et al. Evidence of in vivo generation of thrombin in patients with small-for-gestational-age fetuses and pre-eclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;11:362–7. doi: 10.1080/jmf.11.6.362.367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dekker G. Prothrombotic mechanisms in preeclampsia. Thromb Res. 2005;115:17–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Erez O, Romero R, Kim SS, et al. Over-expression of the thrombin receptor (PAR-1) in the placenta in preeclampsia: a mechanism for the intersection of coagulation and inflammation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21:345–55. doi: 10.1080/14767050802034859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Erez O, Romero R, Hoppensteadt D, et al. Tissue factor and its natural inhibitor in pre-eclampsia and SGA. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21:855–69. doi: 10.1080/14767050802361872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kenny LC, Baker PN, Cunningham FG. Platelets, coagulation, and the liver. In: Lindheimer MD, Roberts JM, Cunningham GC, editors. Chesley’s hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. San Diego: Elsevier; 2009. pp. 335–51. [Google Scholar]
  36. Socol ML, Weiner CP, Louis G, et al. Platelet activation in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:494–7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90276-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Csaicsich P, Deutinger J, Tatra G. Platelet specific proteins (beta-thromboglobulin and platelet factor 4) in normal pregnancy and in pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1989;244:91–5. doi: 10.1007/BF00931379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ahmed Y, van Iddekinge B, Paul C, et al. Retrospective analysis of platelet numbers and volumes in normal pregnancy and in pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:216–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb15233.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Major HD, Campbell RA, Silver RM, et al. Synthesis of sFlt-1 by platelet-monocyte aggregates contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:547.e1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Deng L, Bremme K, Hansson LO, et al. Plasma levels of von Willebrand factor and fibronectin as markers of persisting endothelial damage in preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:941–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Molvarec A, Rigo J, Jr, Boze T, et al. Increased plasma von Willebrand factor antigen levels but normal von Willebrand factor cleaving protease (ADAMTS13) activity in preeclampsia. Thromb Haemost. 2009;101:305–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Stepanian A, Cohen-Moatti M, Sanglier T, et al. Von Willebrand factor and ADAMTS13: a candidate couple for preeclampsia pathophysiology. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:1703–9. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.223610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Xiong Y, Zhou SF, Zhou R, et al. Alternations of maternal and cord plasma hemostasis in preeclampsia before and after delivery. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2011;30:347–58. doi: 10.3109/10641950903572274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Aref S, Goda H. Increased VWF antigen levels and decreased ADAMTS13 activity in preeclampsia. Hematology. 2013;18:237–41. doi: 10.1179/1607845412Y.0000000070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Stubbs TM, Lazarchick J, Horger EO., III Plasma fibronectin levels in preeclampsia: a possible biochemical marker for vascular endothelial damage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;150:885–7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(84)90468-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Friedman SA, de Groot CJ, Taylor RN, et al. Plasma cellular fibronectin as a measure of endothelial involvement in preeclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:838–41. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70295-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kupferminc MJ, Peaceman AM, Wigton TR, et al. Fetal fibronectin levels are elevated in maternal plasma and amniotic fluid of patients with severe preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:649–53. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90587-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gredmark T, Bergman B, Hellstrom L. Total fibronectin in maternal plasma as a predictor for preeclampsia. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;47:89–94. doi: 10.1159/000010069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Chavarria ME, Lara-Gonzalez L, Gonzalez-Gleason A, et al. Maternal plasma cellular fibronectin concentrations in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies: a longitudinal study for early prediction of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:595–601. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.123281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Aydin T, Varol FG, Sayin NC. Third trimester maternal plasma total fibronectin levels in pregnancy-induced hypertension: results of a tertiary center. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2006;12:33–9. doi: 10.1177/107602960601200106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Leeflang MM, Cnossen JS, van der Post JA, et al. Accuracy of fibronectin tests for the prediction of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;133:12–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Powers RW, Catov JM, Bodnar LM, et al. Evidence of endothelial dysfunction in preeclampsia and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Reprod Sci. 2008;15:374–81. doi: 10.1177/1933719107311780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Dane C, Buyukasik H, Dane B, et al. Maternal plasma fibronectin and advanced oxidative protein products for the prediction of preeclampsia in high risk pregnancies: a prospective cohort study. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2009;26:189–94. doi: 10.1159/000259317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Uzun H, Konukoglu D, Albayrak M, et al. Increased maternal serum and cord blood fibronectin concentrations in preeclampsia are associated with higher placental hyaluronic acid and hydroxyproline content. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2010;29:153–62. doi: 10.3109/10641950902968619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Bodova KB, Biringer K, Dokus K, et al. Fibronectin, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) and uterine artery Doppler velocimetry as markers of preeclampsia. Dis Markers. 2011;30:191–6. doi: 10.3233/DMA-2011-0772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Rasanen J, Quinn MJ, Laurie A, et al. Maternal serum glycosylated fibronectin as a point-of-care biomarker for assessment of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.052. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Austgulen R, Lien E, Vince G, et al. Increased maternal plasma levels of soluble adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, VCAM-1, E-selectin) in preeclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997;71:53–8. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(96)02647-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Krauss T, Kuhn W, Lakoma C, et al. Circulating endothelial cell adhesion molecules as diagnostic markers for the early identification of pregnant women at risk for development of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:443–9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70213-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Heyl W, Handt S, Reister F, et al. The role of soluble adhesion molecules in evaluating endothelial cell activation in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:68–72. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70152-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Yoshimatsu J, et al. Soluble adhesion molecule profile in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;12:19–27. doi: 10.1080/jmf.12.1.19.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Coata G, Pennacchi L, Bini V, et al. Soluble adhesion molecules: marker of pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;12:28–34. doi: 10.1080/jmf.12.1.28.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Kim SY, Ryu HM, Yang JH, et al. Maternal serum levels of VCAM-1, ICAM-1 and E-selectin in preeclampsia. J Korean Med Sci. 2004;19:688–92. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2004.19.5.688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Szarka A, Rigo J, Jr, Lazar L, et al. Circulating cytokines, chemokines and adhesion molecules in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia determined by multiplex suspension array. BMC Immunol. 2010;11:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-11-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lewis DF, Canzoneri BJ, Gu Y, et al. Maternal levels of prostacyclin, thromboxane, ICAM, and VCAM in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;64:376–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00861.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Molvarec A, Szarka A, Walentin S, et al. Serum heat shock protein 70 levels in relation to circulating cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules and angiogenic factors in women with preeclampsia. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412:1957–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.06.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Fei X, Hongxiang Z, Qi C, et al. Maternal plasma levels of endothelial dysfunction mediators including AM, CGRP, sICAM-1 and tHcy in pre-eclampsia. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2012;21:573–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Metz TD, Allshouse AA, Euser AG, et al. Preeclampsia in high risk women is characterized by risk group-specific abnormalities in serum biomarkers. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.04.027. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Rappaport VJ, Hirata G, Yap HK, et al. Anti-vascular endothelial cell antibodies in severe preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:138–46. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90836-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Yamamoto T, Takahashi Y, Kuno S, et al. Effects of anti-endothelial cell antibody in pre-eclampsia on endothelin-1 release from cultured endothelial cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 1997;75:340–4. doi: 10.1038/icb.1997.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Yamamoto T, Geshi Y, Kuno S, et al. Anti-endothelial cell antibody in preeclampsia: clinical findings and serum cytotoxicity to endothelial cell. Nihon Rinsho Meneki Gakkai Kaishi. 1998;21:191–7. doi: 10.2177/jsci.21.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Rubin DB, Wiener-Kronish JP, Murray JF, et al. Elevated von Willebrand factor antigen is an early plasma predictor of acute lung injury in nonpulmonary sepsis syndrome. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:474–80. doi: 10.1172/JCI114733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Sudhoff T, Wehmeier A, Kliche KO, et al. Levels of circulating endothelial adhesion molecules (sE-selectin and sVCAM-1) in adult patients with acute leukemia. Leukemia. 1996;10:682–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kayal S, Jais JP, Aguini N, et al. Elevated circulating E-selectin, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, and von Willebrand factor in patients with severe infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:776–84. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.3.9705034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. McGill SN, Ahmed NA, Christou NV. Increased plasma von Willebrand factor in the systemic inflammatory response syndrome is derived from generalized endothelial cell activation. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:296–300. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199802000-00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lyall F, Hayman RG, Ashworth JR, et al. Relationship of cell adhesion molecule expression to endothelium-dependent relaxation in normal pregnancy and pregnancies complicated with preeclampsia or fetal growth restriction. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 1999;6:196–201. doi: 10.1016/s1071-5576(99)00014-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Bruserud O, Ulvestad E. Expression and release of adhesion molecules by human acute myelogenous leukemia blasts. Leuk Res. 1999;23:149–57. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2126(98)00156-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Bretelle F, Sabatier F, Blann A, et al. Maternal endothelial soluble cell adhesion molecules with isolated small for gestational age fetuses: comparison with pre-eclampsia. BJOG. 2001;108:1277–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00259.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Parra-Cordero M, Turan OM, Kaur A, et al. Maternal serum soluble adhesion molecule levels at 11 + 0–13 + 6 weeks and subsequent development of pre-eclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20:793–6. doi: 10.1080/14767050701500349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Costa C, Touscoz GA, Bergallo M, et al. Non-organ-specific and anti-endothelial antibodies in relation to CMV infection and acute rejection in renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. 2010;24:488–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01092.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Papakonstantinou K, Economou E, Hasiakos D, et al. Antepartum and postpartum maternal plasma levels of E-selectin in pre-eclampsia, gestational proteinuria and gestational hypertension. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;153:112–3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Scherpereel A, Depontieu F, Grigoriu B, et al. Endocan, a new endothelial marker in human sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:532–7. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000198525.82124.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. De Freitas Caires N, Legendre B, Parmentier E, et al. Identification of a 14 kDa endocan fragment generated by cathepsin G, a novel circulating biomarker in patients with sepsis. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2013;78–79:45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2013.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Ozaki K, Toshikuni N, George J, et al. Serum endocan as a novel prognostic biomarker in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer. 2014;5:221–30. doi: 10.7150/jca.7691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. van ‘t Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ, et al. Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002;415:530–6. doi: 10.1038/415530a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Lenburg ME, Liou LS, Gerry NP, et al. Previously unidentified changes in renal cell carcinoma gene expression identified by parametric analysis of microarray data. BMC Cancer. 2003;3:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-3-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Borczuk AC, Shah L, Pearson GD, et al. Molecular signatures in biopsy specimens of lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170:167–74. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200401-066OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Hatfield KJ, Lassalle P, Leiva RA, et al. Serum levels of endothelium-derived endocan are increased in patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia. Hematology. 2011;16:351–6. doi: 10.1179/102453311X13127324303434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Favaro D, Santarosa M, Quaia M, et al. Interleukin-6 and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in renal cancer patients and cultured renal cancer cells. Urol Oncol. 1997;3:51–8. doi: 10.1016/s1078-1439(97)00036-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Hoffmann R, Franzke A, Buer J, et al. Prognostic impact of in vivo soluble cell adhesion molecules in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 1999;79:1742–5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Zhang WH, Qiao ZH, Fan XH, et al. The role of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in binding of acute myeloid leukemic blasts cells to human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2003;42:413–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Basoglu M, Atamanalp SS, Yildirgan MI, et al. Correlation between the serum values of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and total sialic acid levels in patients with breast cancer. Eur Surg Res. 2007;39:136–40. doi: 10.1159/000100110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Gogali A, Charalabopoulos K, Zampira I, et al. Soluble adhesion molecules E-cadherin, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and E-selectin as lung cancer biomarkers. Chest. 2010;138:1173–9. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Qian Q, Zhan P, Sun WK, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in lung adenocarcinoma with malignant pleural effusion: correlations with patient survival and pleural effusion control. Neoplasma. 2012;59:433–9. doi: 10.4149/neo_2012_056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Touvier M, Fezeu L, Ahluwalia N, et al. Association between prediagnostic biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial function and cancer risk: a nested case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177:3–13. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Ishihara N, Matsuo H, Murakoshi H, et al. Increased apoptosis in the syncytiotrophoblast in human term placentas complicated by either preeclampsia or intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:158–66. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.119176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Sibai BM, Ewell M, Levine RJ, et al. Risk factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women. The Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) Study Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1003–10. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. von Dadelszen P, Magee LA, Roberts JM. Subclassification of preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2003;22:143–8. doi: 10.1081/PRG-120021060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, et al. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:163–8. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00386-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Cunningham FG, Morris GB, Mickal A. Acute pyelonephritis of pregnancy: a clinical review. Obstet Gynecol. 1973;42:112–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Gilstrap LC, III, Cunningham FG, Whalley PJ. Acute pyelonephritis in pregnancy: an anterospective study. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;57:409–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Ogge G, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, et al. Serum and plasma determination of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors yield different results: the need for standardization in clinical practice. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:820–7. doi: 10.3109/14767050903366119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Chaiworapongsa T, Espinoza J, Gotsch F, et al. The maternal plasma soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 concentration is elevated in SGA and the magnitude of the increase relates to Doppler abnormalities in the maternal and fetal circulation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008;21:25–40. doi: 10.1080/14767050701832833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Kusanovic JP, et al. Plasma soluble endoglin concentration in pre-eclampsia is associated with an increased impedance to flow in the maternal and fetal circulations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:155–62. doi: 10.1002/uog.7491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Kurmanavicius J, Florio I, Wisser J, et al. Reference resistance indices of the umbilical, fetal middle cerebral and uterine arteries at 24–42 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;10:112–20. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10020112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Vita JA, Keaney JF., Jr Endothelial function: a barometer for cardiovascular risk? Circulation. 2002;106:640–2. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000028581.07992.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Deanfield JE, Halcox JP, Rabelink TJ. Endothelial function and dysfunction: testing and clinical relevance. Circulation. 2007;115:1285–95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.652859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Forstermann U, Munzel T. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vascular disease: from marvel to menace. Circulation. 2006;113:1708–14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.602532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Bauer V, Sotnikova R. Nitric oxide – the endothelium-derived relaxing factor and its role in endothelial functions. Gen Physiol Biophys. 2010;29:319–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Cacanyiova S. The vasoactive role of nitric oxide: physiological and morphological aspects. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2011;12:1294–304. doi: 10.2174/138920111798280992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Gkaliagkousi E, Ferro A. Nitric oxide signalling in the regulation of cardiovascular and platelet function. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2011;16:1873–97. doi: 10.2741/3828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Vita JA. Endothelial function. Circulation. 2011;124:e906–12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.078824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Forstermann U, Sessa WC. Nitric oxide synthases: regulation and function. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:829–837. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr304. 837a–d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Tousoulis D, Kampoli AM, Tentolouris C, et al. The role of nitric oxide on endothelial function. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2012;10:4–18. doi: 10.2174/157016112798829760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. van Hinsbergh VW. Endothelium – role in regulation of coagulation and inflammation. Semin Immunopathol. 2012;34:93–106. doi: 10.1007/s00281-011-0285-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Lei J, Vodovotz Y, Tzeng E, et al. Nitric oxide, a protective molecule in the cardiovascular system. Nitric Oxide. 2013;35:175–85. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2013.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Loscalzo J. The identification of nitric oxide as endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Circ Res. 2013;113:100–3. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.301577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Forstermann U, Closs EI, Pollock JS, et al. Nitric oxide synthase isozymes. Characterization, purification, molecular cloning, and functions. Hypertension. 1994;23:1121–31. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.23.6.1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Corson MA, James NL, Latta SE, et al. Phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in response to fluid shear stress. Circ Res. 1996;79:984–91. doi: 10.1161/01.res.79.5.984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Ballermann BJ, Dardik A, Eng E, et al. Shear stress and the endothelium. Kidney Int Suppl. 1998;67:S100–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.06720.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Balligand JL, Feron O, Dessy C. eNOS activation by physical forces: from short-term regulation of contraction to chronic remodeling of cardiovascular tissues. Physiol Rev. 2009;89:481–534. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00042.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Boon RA, Horrevoets AJ. Key transcriptional regulators of the vasoprotective effects of shear stress. Hamostaseologie. 2009;29:39–40. 41–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Vessieres E, Freidja ML, Loufrani L, et al. Flow (shear stress)-mediated remodeling of resistance arteries in diabetes. Vascul Pharmacol. 2012;57:173–8. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2012.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Govers R, Rabelink TJ. Cellular regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2001;280:F193–206. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.2001.280.2.F193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Duda DG, Fukumura D, Jain RK. Role of eNOS in neovascularization: NO for endothelial progenitor cells. Trends Mol Med. 2004;10:143–5. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2004.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Sessa WC. eNOS at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2004;117:2427–9. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Igarashi J, Michel T. S1P and eNOS regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1781:489–95. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2008.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Rafikov R, Fonseca FV, Kumar S, et al. eNOS activation and NO function: structural motifs responsible for the posttranslational control of endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity. J Endocrinol. 2011;210:271–84. doi: 10.1530/JOE-11-0083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Thomas SR, Witting PK, Drummond GR. Redox control of endothelial function and dysfunction: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2008;10:1713–65. doi: 10.1089/ars.2008.2027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Rizzo V, McIntosh DP, Oh P, et al. In situ flow activates endothelial nitric oxide synthase in luminal caveolae of endothelium with rapid caveolin dissociation and calmodulin association. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:34724–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.52.34724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Garcia-Cardena G, Comander J, Anderson KR, et al. Biomechanical activation of vascular endothelium as a determinant of its functional phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:4478–85. doi: 10.1073/pnas.071052598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Koo A, Nordsletten D, Umeton R, et al. In silico modeling of shear-stress-induced nitric oxide production in endothelial cells through systems biology. Biophys J. 2013;104:2295–306. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.03.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Bevilacqua MP, Pober JS, Majeau GR, et al. Interleukin 1 (IL-1) induces biosynthesis and cell surface expression of procoagulant activity in human vascular endothelial cells. J Exp Med. 1984;160:618–23. doi: 10.1084/jem.160.2.618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Bevilacqua MP, Pober JS, Wheeler ME, et al. Interleukin 1 acts on cultured human vascular endothelium to increase the adhesion of polymorphonuclear leukocytes, monocytes, and related leukocyte cell lines. J Clin Invest. 1985;76:2003–11. doi: 10.1172/JCI112200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Yong K, Khwaja A. Leucocyte cellular adhesion molecules. Blood Rev. 1990;4:211–25. doi: 10.1016/0268-960x(90)90001-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Bevilacqua MP, Pober JS, Mendrick DL, et al. Identification of an inducible endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:9238–42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.24.9238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Albelda SM, Smith CW, Ward PA. Adhesion molecules and inflammatory injury. FASEB J. 1994;8:504–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Jutila MA. Leukocyte traffic to sites of inflammation. APMIS. 1992;100:191–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1992.tb00861.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Williams TJ, Hellewell PG. Endothelial cell biology. Adhesion molecules involved in the microvascular inflammatory response. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146:S45–50. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/146.5_Pt_2.S45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. De Caterina R, Libby P, Peng HB, et al. Nitric oxide decreases cytokine-induced endothelial activation. Nitric oxide selectively reduces endothelial expression of adhesion molecules and proinflammatory cytokines. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:60–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI118074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Liao JK. Linking endothelial dysfunction with endothelial cell activation. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:540–1. doi: 10.1172/JCI66843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Grumbach IM, Chen W, Mertens SA, et al. A negative feedback mechanism involving nitric oxide and nuclear factor kappa-B modulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase transcription. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2005;39:595–603. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2005.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Lazzerini G, Del Turco S, Basta G, et al. Prominent role of NF-kappaB in the induction of endothelial activation by endogenous nitric oxide inhibition. Nitric Oxide. 2009;21:184–91. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2009.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Lee KS, Kim J, Kwak SN, et al. Functional role of NF-kappaB in expression of human endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;448:101–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.04.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Panza JA, Quyyumi AA, Brush JE, Jr., et al. Abnormal endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in patients with essential hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:22–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199007053230105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Liao JK, Shin WS, Lee WY, et al. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein decreases the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:319–24. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.1.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Amato M, Frigerio B, Castelnuovo S, et al. Effects of smoking regular or light cigarettes on brachial artery flow-mediated dilation. Atherosclerosis. 2013;228:153–60. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.02.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Messner B, Bernhard D. Smoking and cardiovascular disease: mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction and early atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:509–15. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.300156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Talib J, Kwan J, Suryo Rahmanto A, et al. The smoking-associated oxidant hypothiocyanous acid induces endothelial nitric oxide synthase dysfunction. Biochem J. 2014;457:89–97. doi: 10.1042/BJ20131135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Gryglewski RJ, Palmer RM, Moncada S. Superoxide anion is involved in the breakdown of endothelium-derived vascular relaxing factor. Nature. 1986;320:454–6. doi: 10.1038/320454a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Ohara Y, Peterson TE, Harrison DG. Hypercholesterolemia increases endothelial superoxide anion production. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:2546–51. doi: 10.1172/JCI116491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Rochette L, Lorin J, Zeller M, et al. Nitric oxide synthase inhibition and oxidative stress in cardiovascular diseases: possible therapeutic targets? Pharmacol Ther. 2013;140:239–57. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Magenta A, Greco S, Capogrossi MC, et al. Nitric oxide, oxidative stress, and p66Shc interplay in diabetic endothelial dysfunction. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:193095. doi: 10.1155/2014/193095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Kinlay S, Libby P, Ganz P. Endothelial function and coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2001;12:383–9. doi: 10.1097/00041433-200108000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Robbie L, Libby P. Inflammation and atherothrombosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;947:167–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb03939.x. discussion 179–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Beckman JA, Creager MA, Libby P. Diabetes and atherosclerosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. JAMA. 2002;287:2570–81. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.19.2570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Libby P, Aikawa M, Jain MK. Vascular endothelium and atherosclerosis. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2006;176:285–306. doi: 10.1007/3-540-36028-x_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Naccasha N, Gervasi MT, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Phenotypic and metabolic characteristics of monocytes and granulocytes in normal pregnancy and maternal infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1118–23. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.117682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Lyall F, Greer IA, Boswell F, et al. Expression of cell adhesion molecules in placentae from pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Placenta. 1995;16:579–87. doi: 10.1016/0143-4004(95)90027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Smith CW. Potential significance of circulating E-selectin. Circulation. 1997;95:1986–8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.8.1986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Vadachkoria S, Sanchez SE, Qiu C, et al. Hyperhomocyst(e)inemia and elevated soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 concentrations are associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2004;58:133–9. doi: 10.1159/000079067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Vadachkoria S, Woelk GB, Mahomed K, et al. Elevated soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, elevated Homocyst(e)inemia, and hypertriglyceridemia in relation to preeclampsia risk. Am J Hypertens. 2006;19:235–42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Ley K, Huo Y. VCAM-1 is critical in atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:1209–10. doi: 10.1172/JCI13005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Daniel Y, Kupferminc MJ, Baram A, et al. A selective increase in plasma soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 levels in preeclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1999;41:407–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1999.tb00455.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Baviera G, D’Anna R, Corrado F, et al. ICAM-1 in maternal serum and amniotic fluid as an early marker of preeclampsia and IUGR. J Reprod Med. 2002;47:191–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Lassalle P, Molet S, Janin A, et al. ESM-1 is a novel human endothelial cell-specific molecule expressed in lung and regulated by cytokines. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:20458–64. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.34.20458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Zhang SM, Zuo L, Zhou Q, et al. Expression and distribution of endocan in human tissues. Biotech Histochem. 2012;87:172–8. doi: 10.3109/10520295.2011.577754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Bechard D, Meignin V, Scherpereel A, et al. Characterization of the secreted form of endothelial-cell-specific molecule 1 by specific monoclonal antibodies. J Vasc Res. 2000;37:417–25. doi: 10.1159/000025758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Bechard D, Scherpereel A, Hammad H, et al. Human endothelial-cell specific molecule-1 binds directly to the integrin CD11a/CD18 (LFA-1) and blocks binding to intercellular adhesion molecule-1. J Immunol. 2001;167:3099–106. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.6.3099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Lee W, Ku SK, Kim SW, et al. Endocan elicits severe vascular inflammatory responses in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Physiol. 2014;229:620–30. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. De Freitas Caires N, Barrier M, Sarrazin S, et al. Identification of cathepsin G in the generation of elastase-resistant fragment of the vascular endocan. Involvement in the regulation of LFA-1-dependent cascade. Crit Care. 2010;13:P16. [Google Scholar]
  171. Tissier S, Lancel S, Marechal X, et al. Calpain inhibitors improve myocardial dysfunction and inflammation induced by endotoxin in rats. Shock. 2004;21:352–7. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200404000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Bechard D, Gentina T, Delehedde M, et al. Endocan is a novel chondroitin sulfate/dermatan sulfate proteoglycan that promotes hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor mitogenic activity. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:48341–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M108395200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Sarrazin S, Adam E, Lyon M, et al. Endocan or endothelial cell specific molecule-1 (ESM-1): a potential novel endothelial cell marker and a new target for cancer therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1765:25–37. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2005.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Shin JW, Huggenberger R, Detmar M. Transcriptional profiling of VEGF-A and VEGF-C target genes in lymphatic endothelium reveals endothelial-specific molecule-1 as a novel mediator of lymphangiogenesis. Blood. 2008;112:2318–26. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-05-156331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Scherpereel A, Gentina T, Grigoriu B, et al. Overexpression of endocan induces tumor formation. Cancer Res. 2003;63:6084–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Springer TA. Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: the multistep paradigm. Cell. 1994;76:301–14. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90337-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Ogge G, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Leukocytes of pregnant women with small-for-gestational age neonates have a different phenotypic and metabolic activity from those of women with preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:476–87. doi: 10.3109/14767050903216033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Sacks G, Sargent I, Redman C. An innate view of human pregnancy. Immunol Today. 1999;20:114–8. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5699(98)01393-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Schiff E, Friedman SA, Baumann P, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha in pregnancies associated with preeclampsia or small-for-gestational-age newborns. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:1224–9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70130-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Conrad KP, Benyo DF. Placental cytokines and the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1997;37:240–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1997.tb00222.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Conrad KP, Miles TM, Benyo DF. Circulating levels of immunoreactive cytokines in women with preeclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1998;40:102–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1998.tb00398.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Freeman DJ, McManus F, Brown EA, et al. Short- and long-term changes in plasma inflammatory markers associated with preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2004;44:708–14. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000143849.67254.ca. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Jonsson Y, Ruber M, Matthiesen L, et al. Cytokine mapping of sera from women with preeclampsia and normal pregnancies. J Reprod Immunol. 2006;70:83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2005.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Sharma A, Satyam A, Sharma JB. Leptin, IL-10 and inflammatory markers (TNF-alpha, IL-6 and IL-8) in pre-eclamptic, normotensive pregnant and healthy non-pregnant women. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2007;58:21–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2007.00486.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Borekci B, Aksoy H, Al RA, et al. Maternal serum interleukin-10, interleukin-2 and interleukin-6 in pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2007;58:56–64. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2007.00491.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Gu Y, Lewis DF, Deere K, et al. Elevated maternal IL-16 levels, enhanced IL-16 expressions in endothelium and leukocytes, and increased IL-16 production by placental trophoblasts in women with preeclampsia. J Immunol. 2008;181:4418–22. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.6.4418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Sibai B, Romero R, Klebanoff MA, et al. Maternal plasma concentrations of the soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 are increased prior to the diagnosis of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:630.e1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Lewis DF, Canzoneri BJ, Wang Y. Maternal circulating TNF-alpha levels are highly correlated with IL-10 levels, but not IL-6 and IL-8 levels, in women with pre-eclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2009;62:269–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2009.00735.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Vitoratos N, Economou E, Iavazzo C, et al. Maternal serum levels of TNF-alpha and IL-6 long after delivery in preeclamptic and normotensive pregnant women. Mediators Inflamm. 2010;2010:908649. doi: 10.1155/2010/908649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Tosun M, Celik H, Avci B, et al. Maternal and umbilical serum levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in normal pregnancies and in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:880–6. doi: 10.3109/14767051003774942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Kalkunte S, Nevers T, Norris WE, et al. Vascular IL-10: a protective role in preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol. 2011;88:165–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2011.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Xiao JP, Yin YX, Gao YF, et al. The increased maternal serum levels of IL-6 are associated with the severity and onset of preeclampsia. Cytokine. 2012;60:856–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.07.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Cemgil Arikan D, Aral M, Coskun A, et al. Plasma IL-4, IL-8, IL-12, interferon-gamma and CRP levels in pregnant women with preeclampsia, and their relation with severity of disease and fetal birth weight. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:1569–73. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.648233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Lau SY, Guild SJ, Barrett CJ, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 levels are altered in preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2013;70:412–27. doi: 10.1111/aji.12138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Ozkan ZS, Simsek M, Ilhan F, et al. Plasma IL-17, IL-35, interferon-gamma, SOCS3 and TGF-beta levels in pregnant women with preeclampsia, and their relation with severity of disease. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:1513–7. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.861415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Pinheiro MB, Martins-Filho OA, Mota AP, et al. Severe preeclampsia goes along with a cytokine network disturbance towards a systemic inflammatory state. Cytokine. 2013;62:165–73. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Sahin S, Ozakpinar OB, Eroglu M, et al. The impact of platelet functions and inflammatory status on the severity of preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;20:1–6. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.927860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Mellembakken JR, Aukrust P, Hestdal K, et al. Chemokines and leukocyte activation in the fetal circulation during preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2001;38:394–8. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.38.3.394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Gotsch F, Romero R, Friel L, et al. CXCL10/IP-10: a missing link between inflammation and anti-angiogenesis in preeclampsia? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20:777–92. doi: 10.1080/14767050701483298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Laskowska M, Laskowska K, Leszczynska-Gorzelak B, et al. Comparative analysis of the maternal and umbilical interleukin-8 levels in normal pregnancies and in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia with intrauterine normal growth and intrauterine growth retardation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20:527–32. doi: 10.1080/14767050701412719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Boij R, Svensson J, Nilsson-Ekdahl K, et al. Biomarkers of coagulation, inflammation, and angiogenesis are independently associated with preeclampsia. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;68:258–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2012.01158.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Molvarec A, Szarka A, Walentin S, et al. Serum leptin levels in relation to circulating cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules and angiogenic factors in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:124. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Du M, Basu A, Fu D, et al. Serum inflammatory markers and preeclampsia in type 1 diabetes: a prospective study. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:2054–61. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Guven MA, Coskun A, Ertas IE, et al. Association of maternal serum CRP, IL-6, TNF-alpha, homocysteine, folic acid and vitamin B12 levels with the severity of preeclampsia and fetal birth weight. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2009;28:190–200. doi: 10.1080/10641950802601179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Stampalija T, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, et al. Maternal plasma concentrations of sST2 and angiogenic/anti-angiogenic factors in preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:1359–70. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.784256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Granne I, Southcombe JH, Snider JV, et al. ST2 and IL-33 in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24463. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Wang Y, Lewis DF, Gu Y, et al. Elevated maternal soluble Gp130 and IL-6 levels and reduced Gp130 and SOCS-3 expressions in women complicated with preeclampsia. Hypertension. 2011;57:336–42. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.163360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Sharma D, Singh A, Trivedi SS, et al. Role of endothelin and inflammatory cytokines in pre-eclampsia – a pilot North Indian study. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;65:428–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00903.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Ozler A, Turgut A, Sak ME, et al. Serum levels of neopterin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and Interleukin-6 in preeclampsia: relationship with disease severity. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012;16:1707–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Mosimann B, Wagner M, Poon LC, et al. Maternal serum cytokines at 30–33 weeks in the prediction of preeclampsia. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:823–30. doi: 10.1002/pd.4129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Zhang Z, Gao Y, Zhang L, et al. Alterations of IL-6, IL-6R and gp130 in early and late onset severe preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2013;32:270–80. doi: 10.3109/10641955.2013.798332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Darling AM, McDonald CR, Conroy AL, et al. Angiogenic and inflammatory biomarkers in midpregnancy and small-for-gestational-age outcomes in Tanzania. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.032. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Visser S, Hermes W, Ket JC, et al. Systematic review and metaanalysis on nonclassic cardiovascular biomarkers after hypertensive pregnancy disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.032. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Tjoa ML, van Vugt JM, Go AT, et al. Elevated C-reactive protein levels during first trimester of pregnancy are indicative of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. J Reprod Immunol. 2003;59:29–37. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0378(02)00085-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Qiu C, Luthy DA, Zhang C, et al. A prospective study of maternal serum C-reactive protein concentrations and risk of preeclampsia. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17:154–60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2003.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Teran E, Escudero C, Calle A. C-reactive protein during normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;89:299–300. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Paternoster DM, Fantinato S, Stella A, et al. C-reactive protein in hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2006;12:330–7. doi: 10.1177/1076029606291382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Garcia RG, Celedon J, Sierra-Laguado J, et al. Raised C-reactive protein and impaired flow-mediated vasodilation precede the development of preeclampsia. Am J Hypertens. 2007;20:98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2006.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Ertas IE, Kahyaoglu S, Yilmaz B, et al. Association of maternal serum high sensitive C-reactive protein level with body mass index and severity of pre-eclampsia at third trimester. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36:970–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2010.01279.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. de Jonge LL, Steegers EA, Ernst GD, et al. C-reactive protein levels, blood pressure and the risks of gestational hypertensive complications: the Generation R Study. J Hypertens. 2011;29:2413–21. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834c58e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Gandevani SB, Banaem LM, Mohamadi B, et al. Association of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein serum levels in early pregnancy with the severity of preeclampsia and fetal birth weight. J Perinat Med. 2012;14:1–5. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2011-0190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Kucukgoz Gulec U, Tuncay Ozgunen F, Baris Guzel A, et al. An analysis of C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and D-dimer in pre-eclamptic patients. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2012;68:331–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2012.01171.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Chaemsaithong P, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, et al. Maternal plasma soluble TRAIL is decreased in preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:217–27. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.806906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Rebelo F, Schlussel MM, Vaz JS, et al. C-reactive protein and later preeclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis taking into account the weight status. J Hypertens. 2013;31:16–26. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835b0556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Chaemsaithong P, Romero R, Chaiworapongsa T, et al. Fetuin-A, a negative acute phase protein reactant, is decreased in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 . [Epub ahead of print] [Google Scholar]
  226. Molvarec A, Kalabay L, Derzsy Z, et al. Preeclampsia is associated with decreased serum alpha(2)-HS glycoprotein (fetuin-A) concentration. Hypertens Res. 2009;32:665–9. doi: 10.1038/hr.2009.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Korzeniewski SJ, et al. Pre-eclampsia part 2: prediction, prevention and management. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014;10:531–40. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2014.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  228. Rennel E, Mellberg S, Dimberg A, et al. Endocan is a VEGF-A and PI3K regulated gene with increased expression in human renal cancer. Exp Cell Res. 2007;313:1285–94. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  229. Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Gotsch F, et al. Acute pyelonephritis during pregnancy changes the balance of angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors in maternal plasma. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:167–78. doi: 10.3109/14767050903067378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Gotsch F, Romero R, Espinoza J, et al. Maternal serum concentrations of the chemokine CXCL10/IP-10 are elevated in acute pyelonephritis during pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20:735–44. doi: 10.1080/14767050701511650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Soto E, Richani K, Romero R, et al. Increased concentration of the complement split product C5a in acute pyelonephritis during pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;17:247–52. doi: 10.1080/14767050500072805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  232. Soto E, Romero R, Vaisbuch E, et al. Fragment Bb: evidence for activation of the alternative pathway of the complement system in pregnant women with acute pyelonephritis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:1085–90. doi: 10.3109/14767051003649870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  233. Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R, Whitten A, et al. Differences and similarities in the transcriptional profile of peripheral whole blood in early and late-onset preeclampsia: insights into the molecular basis of the phenotype of preeclampsiaa. J Perinat Med. 2013;41:485–504. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  234. Madan I, Than NG, Romero R, et al. The peripheral whole-blood transcriptome of acute pyelonephritis in human pregnancya. J Perinat Med. 2014;42:31–53. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  235. Tsao PN, Chan FT, Wei SC, et al. Soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 protects mice in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1955–60. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000275273.56547.B8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  236. Shapiro NI, Yano K, Okada H, et al. A prospective, observational study of soluble FLT-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor in sepsis. Shock. 2008;29:452–7. doi: 10.1097/shk.0b013e31815072c1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  237. Kim YM, Romero R, Oh SY, et al. Toll-like receptor 4: a potential link between “danger signals,” the innate immune system, and preeclampsia? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:921–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.07.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Waage A, Aasen AO. Different role of cytokine mediators in septic shock related to meningococcal disease and surgery/polytrauma. Immunol Rev. 1992;127:221–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1992.tb01416.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  239. Martin C, Boisson C, Haccoun M, et al. Patterns of cytokine evolution (tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6) after septic shock, hemorrhagic shock, and severe trauma. Crit Care Med. 1997;25:1813–9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199711000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  240. Hack CE, Aarden LA, Thijs LG. Role of cytokines in sepsis. Adv Immunol. 1997;66:101–95. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2776(08)60597-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  241. Riche FC, Cholley BP, Panis YH, et al. Inflammatory cytokine response in patients with septic shock secondary to generalized peritonitis. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:433–7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200002000-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  242. Romero R, Kadar N, Vaisbuch E, et al. Maternal death following cardiopulmonary collapse after delivery: amniotic fluid embolism or septic shock due to intrauterine infection? Am J Reprod Immunol. 2010;64:113–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2010.00823.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  243. Mikkelsen ME, Shah CV, Scherpereel A, et al. Lower serum endocan levels are associated with the development of acute lung injury after major trauma. J Crit Care. 2012;27:522.e11–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.07.077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  244. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Hankins GD, et al. Respiratory insufficiency associated with pyelonephritis during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;63:121–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  245. Cunningham FG, Lucas MJ. Urinary tract infections complicating pregnancy. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;8:353–73. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3552(05)80325-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  246. Cunningham FG, Lucas MJ, Hankins GD. Pulmonary injury complicating antepartum pyelonephritis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987;156:797–807. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90335-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  247. Jolley JA, Wing DA. Pyelonephritis in pregnancy: an update on treatment options for optimal outcomes. Drugs. 2010;70:1643–55. doi: 10.2165/11538050-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  248. Jolley JA, Kim S, Wing DA. Acute pyelonephritis and associated complications during pregnancy in 2006 in US hospitals. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:2494–8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.704441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  249. Wing DA, Fassett MJ, Getahun D. Acute pyelonephritis in pregnancy: an 18-year retrospective analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:219.e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES