Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2015 Mar 27;4:e06119. doi: 10.7554/eLife.06119

Bovine F1Fo ATP synthase monomers bend the lipid bilayer in 2D membrane crystals

Chimari Jiko 1,, Karen M Davies 2,*,, Kyoko Shinzawa-Itoh 3, Kazutoshi Tani 4, Shintaro Maeda 3, Deryck J Mills 2, Tomitake Tsukihara 3,5, Yoshinori Fujiyoshi 4, Werner Kühlbrandt 2, Christoph Gerle 3,5,*
Editor: Sjors HW Scheres6
PMCID: PMC4413875  PMID: 25815585

Abstract

We have used a combination of electron cryo-tomography, subtomogram averaging, and electron crystallographic image processing to analyse the structure of intact bovine F1Fo ATP synthase in 2D membrane crystals. ATPase assays and mass spectrometry analysis of the 2D crystals confirmed that the enzyme complex was complete and active. The structure of the matrix-exposed region was determined at 24 Å resolution by subtomogram averaging and repositioned into the tomographic volume to reveal the crystal packing. F1Fo ATP synthase complexes are inclined by 16° relative to the crystal plane, resulting in a zigzag topology of the membrane and indicating that monomeric bovine heart F1Fo ATP synthase by itself is sufficient to deform lipid bilayers. This local membrane curvature is likely to be instrumental in the formation of ATP synthase dimers and dimer rows, and thus for the shaping of mitochondrial cristae.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06119.001

Research organism: other

eLife digest

Cells use a molecule called adenosine triphosphate (or ATP for short) to power many processes that are vital for life. Animals, plants, and fungi primarily make their ATP in a specialised compartment called the mitochondrion, which is found inside their cells. The mitochondrion is often referred to as the powerhouse of cells as it captures and stores the energy that animals gain from eating food in the molecule ATP. Other enzymes in the cell break apart ATP to release the stored energy, which they use to power various cellular processes.

The interior architecture of the mitochondrion includes a highly folded inner membrane where electrical energy is transformed into chemical energy. The tight folding of the inner membrane is thought to make this process more efficient. An enzyme named ATP synthase performs the final steps of the energy transformation process by producing ATP (ATP synthase literally means ‘ATP maker’). This enzyme sits in pairs along the edges of the inner membrane folds. This raises the question: does the ATP synthase cause the membrane to fold or does this enzyme just ‘prefer’ these folded edges (which are instead caused by something else inside the mitochondrion)?

To investigate this question, Jiko, Davies et al. extracted ATP synthase from the mitochondria of cow hearts and mixed them with modified fat molecules to form a ‘2D membrane crystal’: a membrane containing an ordered pattern of enzymes. An electron microscope was used to generate a three-dimensional volume of the 2D membrane crystal via a process similar to a MRI or CAT scan that one might have in hospital. In the three-dimensional volume of the membrane crystal, Jiko, Davies et al. discovered that instead of being flat as expected, the membrane of the 2D membrane crystal was rippled and that this ripple was caused by the membrane-embedded part of the ATP synthase. The geometry of the ripple exactly matched half of the bend at the edge of the membrane folds in the mitochondrion. Therefore, Jiko, Davies et al. concluded that a pair of ATP synthases, as found in mitochondria, was responsible for defining the tight folds of the inner mitochondrial membrane.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06119.002

Introduction

The F1Fo ATP synthase is a membrane-embedded nano-machine and a member of the rotary ATPases (F-, V- and A-ATPases), which are found in energy-converting membranes of all eukaryotes, bacteria, and archaea (Muench et al., 2011). The enzyme catalyses the formation of ATP from ADP and inorganic phosphate (Pi) using the energy stored in a trans-membrane electrochemical gradient of protons or sodium ions (Boyer, 1997; von Ballmoos et al., 2009). The bovine heart enzyme has a molecular mass of approximately 600 kDa and consists of 17 different subunits (α3, β3, γ, δ, ε, a, b, c8, d, e, f, g, A6L, F6, oligomycin sensitivity conferral protein [OSCP], DAPIT, and a 6.8 kDa protein) (Meyer et al., 2007; Runswick et al., 2013). The enzyme can be subdivided into four essential functional parts: the catalytic part, (αβ)3, which binds and converts ADP and Pi to ATP; the membrane-embedded part (a, b, c8, e, f, g, A6L, DAPIT, and the 6.8 kDa protein) through which protons move across the membrane; the central stalk, γδε, which transmits the rotation of the membrane-embedded rotor-ring (c8) to the catalytic region; and the peripheral stalk (b, d, F6 and OSCP) which holds the catalytic part stationary relative to the membrane region. The catalytic and central stalk regions form the F1 subcomplex and the remainder, the Fo subcomplex.

Structural studies of the intact F1Fo ATP synthase complex have been held back by the tendency of the enzyme to dissociate when extracted from the membrane. Nevertheless, a number of atomic models have been obtained by x-ray crystallography for various parts of the yeast and bovine mitochondrial F1Fo ATP synthase including the F1 subcomplex (Abrahams et al., 1994), the F1/c-ring subcomplex (Stock et al., 1999; Watt et al., 2010), the peripheral stalk subcomplex (Dickson et al., 2006), and the F1/peripheral stalk fragment (Rees et al., 2009). All these structures except the c-ring belong to the soluble region of the F1Fo ATP synthase. The membrane-embedded part of the mitochondrial F1Fo ATP synthase has two important functions. First, it allows protons to cross the membrane, thereby driving ATP synthesis; and second, it causes the dimerisation and oligomerisation of the enzyme in the membrane. The first structure of the membrane-embedded region of an F1Fo ATP synthase dimer was recently determined for the colourless green algae, Polytomella sp., by single-particle cryo-EM (Allegretti et al., 2015). At 7 Å, the map shows that the conserved a-subunit forms a pair of horizontal helix haripins adjacent to the c-ring, whereas the peripheral stalk forms an intricate and unique dimerisation interface which is different from that of the bovine or yeast enzyme (Davies et al., 2011).

In mitochondria, F1Fo ATP synthases occur as rows of dimers on highly curved ridges in cristae membranes (Strauss et al., 2008; Davies et al., 2011, 2012). Knock-out studies in yeast demonstrated the involvement of subunits e and g in dimer formation and cristae morphology, suggesting a crucial role of the F1Fo ATP synthase dimers in cristae formation (Paumard et al., 2002; Davies et al., 2012). Subtomogram averaging of the F1Fo ATP synthase dimers in situ revealed an angle of 86° between the monomers (Davies et al., 2012). Coarse-grained molecular dynamic simulations have indicated that the shape of the F1Fo ATP synthase dimer alone is sufficient to deform the lipid bilayer and drive the self-assembly of the F1Fo ATP synthase dimers into rows (Davies et al., 2012). However, a recent single-particle cryo-EM map of detergent solubilised, bovine F1Fo ATP synthase monomers found the detergent micelle around the Fo domain was bent leading to the suggestion that the monomer alone could deform lipid bilayers (Baker et al., 2012).

Electron cryo-crystallography and electron cryo-tomography allow the structure of membrane-embedded proteins to be investigated in a lipid environment (Fujiyoshi and Unwin, 2008; Davies and Daum, 2013). To determine the structure of membrane-embedded bovine heart F1Fo ATP synthase, we generated 2D crystals of intact and active bovine heart F1Fo ATP synthase using the synthetic lipid 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DMPC). By a combination of subtomogram averaging and electron crystallography of tomographic slices, we determined the in situ structure and packing of the enzyme complex in 2D crystals. The oblique orientation of individual complexes in the membrane results in a zigzag arrangement of the lipid bilayer, which perfectly matches the observed bend in the detergent micelle of the isolated complex (Baker et al., 2012). Our results demonstrate that the transmembrane region of bovine mitochondrial F1Fo ATP synthase monomer is sufficient to bend the lipid bilayer. This membrane deformation is likely to be a prerequisite for the self-association of F1Fo ATP synthases into dimers and dimers into rows, as observed in mitochondrial cristae.

Results

Formation of stable 2D crystals

Monomeric mitochondrial F1Fo ATP synthase was purified from bovine heart muscle tissue by sucrose density gradient centrifugation and ion-exchange chromatography. For 2D crystallisation, fractions exhibiting high oligomycin-sensitive ATPase activity (>95%) and a high content of native lipids (>100 lipid molecules per F1Fo ATP synthase) were mixed with synthetic DMPC. When the detergent was removed by dialysis, abundant crystalline vesicles formed that were stable for weeks (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). Analysis by SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry confirmed that the crystalline vesicles contained all subunits of the bovine F1Fo ATP synthase, including the small Fo subunits e, f, g, A6L, DAPIT, and the 6.8-kDa protein (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). ATPase assays and blue-native PAGE performed on digitonin-solubilised crystalline vesicles demonstrated that the F1Fo ATP synthase complex in the 2D crystals was intact, active, and highly sensitive to oligomycin (>95%) (Figure 1—figure supplement 3).

Subtomogram average of the F1Fo ATP synthase

The 2D crystals were insufficiently ordered for electron crystallographic processing despite numerous attempts to improve their order and size. Thus, to gain insight into the structure of the membrane-embedded F1Fo ATP synthase, we performed electron cryo-tomography and sub-tomogram averaging. In the tomographic volumes, the F1 subcomplex appears as a 10-nm spherical density attached to the membrane by a thin stalk and is arranged in an alternating up-and-down orientation relative to the central lipid bilayer (Figure 1A,B). Tomographic cross-sections of crystalline vesicles embedded in thick vitreous ice (>200 nm) showed a zigzag morphology of the membrane (Figure 2). Fourier transforms of flat areas of crystalline vesicles showed that the degree of crystalline order varied over short distances. The most highly ordered regions were found in vesicles with a rectangular appearance, in which two membranes were closely apposed (Figure 1C,D). These ordered membrane regions were chosen for further analysis.

Figure 1. 2D crystals of F1Fo ATP synthase in vitreous ice.

(A) Tomographic slice of a vesicle reconstituted with F1Fo ATP synthase. The ATP synthases appear as 10 nm spherical densities located 15 nm above the membrane. (B) Enlarged view of red boxed area in A showing the zigzag membrane structure (arrowhead). (See also Figure 2.) (C) Fourier transform of the blue-boxed area in (A). (D) Cross-section along the yellow dashed line in (A). Scale bar: (A) 100 nm, (B) 20 nm, (D) 50 nm.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06119.003

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Crystalline vesicles of F1Fo ATP synthase in negative stain.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) Overview of an EM grid square with numerous rectangular crystalline vesicles (red arrowheads). Scale bar 3 μm. (B) Rectangular crystalline vesicle at higher magnification with boxed area enlarged. F1 heads (white arrowheads). Scale bar 200 nm.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Subunit composition of F1Fo ATP synthase isolated from 2D crystals.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

(A) SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gel (10–20%) showing the subunit composition of purified F1Fo ATP synthases before (lane 2) and after (lane 3) 2D crystallisation. Lane 1, molecular marker (BenchMark). (B) Mass spectrometry profile of small subunits (5000–12,000 Da) of the F1Fo ATP synthase isolated from 2D crystals. All F1Fo ATP synthase subunits are present in the 2D crystals.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3. Blue-native polyacrylamide gel and activity assay of F1Fo ATP synthase isolated from 2D crystals.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

(A) BN polyacrylamide gradient gel (4–12%) of purified F1Fo ATP synthase solubilized in decylmaltoside (lane 1 and 2, 15 μg and 2 μg respectively) and of digitonin-resolubilised 2D crystals (lane 3 and 4, 30 μg and 90 μg respectively). Bands of lower molecular weight subcomplexes, that is, Fo or c8, are weak or absent. The dimer band in lane 1 and 2 presumably stems from mitochondrial F1Fo ATP synthase dimers preserved by mild purification conditions. The dimer band visible in lane 3 and 4 most likely represents non-physiological F1Fo ATP synthase dimers that form in the 2D crystals. (B) Typical ATPase activity and oligomycin-sensitivity of digitonin-resolubilised F1Fo ATP synthase isolated from 2D crystals. The hydrolysis of ATP by the F1Fo ATP synthase was monitored using an enzyme couple assay by detecting NADH oxidation at 340 nm at 20°C in the absence (blue) or presence (green) of oligomycin. Oligomycin inhibits ATP hydrolysis through F1 by stopping rotation of the Fo motor, that is, oligomycin sensitivity gives a measure of the amount of coupled, intact F1Fo ATP synthase complexes in the preparation, in this case >95%.

Figure 2. Zigzag membrane structure.

Figure 2.

(A) Projection image of a vesicle reconstituted with F1Fo ATP synthase. (B) and (C) tomographic slices of boxed area in (A) at different z-heights. (D) Fourier transform of an oblique tomographic slice through boxed area in (A) showing weak diffraction. (E) Tomographic slice of rectangular crystalline vesicle. (F) Close-up of boxed area in (E). White arrowhead, indicates membrane plane, yellow arrowhead, line of F1 head groups. Scale bar: (A) 50 nm, (B, C, and F) 10 nm, (E) 100 nm.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06119.007

A total of 2100 F1Fo ATP synthase particles from the flattest regions of rectangular crystalline vesicles were manually selected and averaged by gold standard procedures (Scheres and Chen, 2012). According to the 0.5 FSC criterion, the resulting F1Fo ATP synthase average had a resolution of 24 Å (Figure 3 and Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Both the peripheral and central stalks as well as the individual α and β subunits are clearly visible. The α and β subunits form a non-symmetrical hexamer around the central stalk with alternating long and short sides, allowing an accurate assignment to their respective density regions (Figure 3C,D, Figure 3—figure supplement 2).

Figure 3. Sub-tomogram average of bovine heart mitochondrial F1Fo ATP synthase calculated from 2D crystals.

(A) Surface view, (B) longitudinal section showing central stalk, (C) bottom view and (D) top view. Arrowheads: positions of the β subunits. d1 and d2: densities connecting peripheral stalk to F1 subcomplex. Threshold levels: light grey, 1 σ; mesh, 3 σ; dark grey, 5 σ. Scale bar: 20 Å.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06119.008

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Resolution estimate of the ATP synthase monomer sub-tomogram average.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

Fourier shell correlation (FSC) curves were calculated by comparing averages generated from two independently processed data sets (‘Gold standard’; Scheres and Chen, 2012, black line). To check for overfitting, phases beyond 40 Å were randomized (Chen et al., 2013) and the final alignment iteration repeated (grey line). According to the FSC 0.5 criterion (crosshairs), the ATP synthase monomer average has a resolution of 2.4 nm. Points on the FSC curves mark spatial frequency shells used in the FSC calculation.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. The α/β hexamer.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

(A) X-ray map of catalytic domain (PDB code: 1BMF, Abrahams et al., 1994) Fourier-filtered to 25 Å. (B) Subtomogram average calculated from 2D crystals. Dashed lines, cross-section levels in i–iii. Arrowheads, beta subunits *, catalytic interface between α and β subunits. Contour levels drawn at intervals of 0.5 sigma above mean. Scale bar, 20 Å.

The peripheral stalk is the strongest feature in the sub-tomogram average and is easily visible at contour levels >5σ above the mean. As in other cryo-EM maps (Rubinstein et al., 2003; Lau et al., 2008; Baker et al., 2012; Davies et al., 2012), the peripheral stalk of the F1Fo ATP synthase is arranged along the non-catalytic α/β interface and is offset towards the α-subunit, with which it makes contact midway along the stalk (Figure 3). The main contact of the peripheral stalk with the (αβ)3 assembly occurs at the top of the complex (Figure 3A,D). Two distinct densities are visible in this region: one above the α-subunit next to the peripheral stalk and the other above the remaining α-subunits (Figure 3D, d1 and d2, respectively). At lower contour levels, the two densities merge immediately above the β-subunit leaving the centre of the hexameric ring open.

Fitting of atomic models

The first complex we docked into the subtomogram average was the x-ray structure of the F1/peripheral stalk fragment (PDB: 2WSS Rees et al., 2009). All parts of this structure fitted well, with the N-terminal domain of the OSCP occupying the density immediately above the αβα subunits, and the C-terminal domain plus the peripheral stalk occupying the density above the remaining α-subunit. The peripheral stalk subcomplex (PDB: 2CLY Dickson et al., 2006) was then added to the fitted 2WSS structure but the resulting structure did not fit the map (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). The b-subunit residues 182–207 and the C-terminal domain of the OSCP subunit (residues 115–188) from the 2WSS model were then added to the x-ray structure of the bovine peripheral stalk subcomplex (PDB: 2CLY Dickson et al., 2006) and fitted as a rigid body into the subtomogram average. The new model resulted in an excellent match with the EM density (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Finally the c-ring from the F1/c8 x-ray structure (PDB: 2XND Watt et al., 2010) was fitted by superimposing the F1 subcomplex of this structure with that of 2WSS (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Fitted atomic model of the bovine F1Fo ATP synthase.

(AC) Sub-tomogram average with fitted atomic models (A) side view, (B) top view, and (C) the peripheral stalk. Blue, catalytic domain; grey, central stalk; green, oligomycin sensitivity conferral protein (OSCP) from PDB:2WSS (Rees et al., 2009). Purple, c-ring (PDB:2XND) (Watt et al., 2010); Yellow-red, peripheral stalk fragment (PDB: 2CLY) (Dickson et al., 2006) with additional residues from PDB:2WSS (Rees et al., 2009). Pink, α-subunit helix thought to interact with the peripheral stalk. Dashed lines, position of membrane. Scale bar, 20 Å.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06119.011

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Possible atomic models fitted to sub-tomogram average.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(A) Sub-tomogram average fitted with the F1/peripheral stalk complex (PDB entry: 2WSS). (B) as in (A) but peripheral stalk extended with the atomic model of the peripheral stalk fragment (PDB:2CLY). (C) as in (B) but the extended peripheral stalk sub-complex plus C-terminal domain of the OSCP subunit fitted to the average as a rigid-body subsequent to the fitting of the F1-subcomplex plus N-terminal domain of the OSCP subunit from 2WSS. (D) Sequence of the peripheral stalk subunit b from bovine heart showing the position of the predicted trans-membrane helices (blue) and the known helices (red and green) determined by x-ray crystallography. The dashed purple box indicates the residues from PDB:2WSS by which the PDB:2CLY structure was extended for rigid-body fitting in (C). Atomic model subunit colors: blue, α; dark blue, β; light blue, γ,δ,ε; yellow, b; red, F6; brown, d; green OSCP. Scale bar: 20 Å.

Although the sub-tomogram average was calculated from protein reconstituted into membranes, the lipid bilayer itself was not resolved in the average. This is an effect of the missing wedge of information in the tomogram, which blurs out map features perpendicular to the electron beam, rendering the lipid bilayer in effect invisible (Penczek and Frank, 2006). An accurate estimate of the membrane position can however be obtained from the position of the c-ring in our fitted atomic model (Figure 4).

Analysis of crystal packing

To assess the packing of F1Fo ATP synthases in the 2D crystals, the sub-tomogram average was re-inserted into the original tomograms using the inverse of the parameters calculated during averaging (Pruggnaller et al., 2008; Video 1). Defects in the 2D crystal lattice were apparent in the rotational orientation of individual complexes in a single layer (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). For a better understanding of the molecular packing, 400 particles were selected from a small region (235 × 285 nm) of a single crystalline layer, which showed sharp diffraction spots to the third order. These particles were averaged and refined against a reference model calculated from the selected particles, which had been masked to contain a 3 × 3 array of F1Fo ATP synthase densities. The box size of the final average was enlarged to include particles of opposite orientation in the same membrane and the higher resolution subtomogram average (shown in Figure 3) was fitted multiple times into this volume (Figure 5 and Video 2).

Video 1. Tomographic volume of a 2D crystal with re-inserted subtomogram average.

Download video file (6MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.06119.013

The video moves through the z-stacks of the tomogram, revealing the location of the re-inserted sub-tomogram averages of the F1Fo ATP synthase. The four layers of F1Fo ATP synthase molecules are coloured in pink, blue, orange, and green. The predicted position of the vesicle membrane is shown in blue.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06119.013

Video 2. Organization of bovine F1Fo ATP synthases in 2D crystals.

Download video file (5MB, mp4)
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.06119.016

The relative orientation of the F1Fo ATP synthases in a particularly well-ordered region of a 2D crystal is visualized by showing the re-inserted subtomogram averages, then by fitting the F1-c8 crystal structure and finally by fitting the single-particle map of Baker et al., 2012. F1Fo ATP synthases are orientated 16° to the crystal plane resulting in a zigzag arrangement of the lipid bilayer.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06119.016

Figure 5. Packing of bovine F1Fo ATP synthase in the 2D crystal.

(A) Top view of the 2D crystal lattice of bovine F1Fo ATP synthase. Rectangles indicate the position of ATP synthase pairs. Arrows indicate cell axes. (B) Side view of one pair. (C) Cross-section of the crystal lattice indicated by the dashed box and arrowhead in (A). F1Fo ATP synthases of opposite orientation in the membrane are connected via close interaction of their rotor-rings. The rotor-ring pairs are oriented 16° relative to the crystal plane (single grey dashed line). (D) Cross-section as in (C) but with the single-particle EM map (Baker et al., 2012) fitted into the subtomogram averages. The arrangement of the monomeric complexes on the 2D crystal lattice results in a locally kinked lipid bilayer (bold dashed lines). (E) Top view of the cross-section in (D) clipped to remove the catalytic domains of the upper F1Fo ATP synthase layer.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06119.014

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Lattice disorder.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

(A) Side view of subtomogram averages repositioned into the lower face of a 2D crystal. (B) Tomographic slice through a 2D crystal as indicated by line in (A) with a selection of repositioned sub-tomogram averages (transparent). The tomographic slice is viewed from the membrane (indicated by arrow in A). The repositioned subtomogram averages coincide with large and small circular densities, which correspond to the central and peripheral stalks, respectively (orange arrowheads). Scale bar: 10 nm. (C) Graphic representation of selected repositioned sub-tomogram averages in (A) highlighting the disorder in the crystal lattice. Small circles, peripheral stalk; double circle, F1-subcomplex + c-ring; rectangles indicate F1Fo ATP synthase pairs. Arrowheads correspond to those shown in (B) and are included for orientation purposes.

Figure 5A shows the typical packing of F1Fo ATP synthases in the most ordered regions of rectangular-shaped crystalline vesicles. The F1Fo ATP synthases form pairs of particles of twofold symmetry, which are in contact half-way up the peripheral stalks. The angle included by the long axes of the monomers in a pair is approximately 24° (Figure 5B). Note that these ATP synthase pairs in the 2D crystals are structurally unrelated to the native dimers observed in mitochondrial membranes (Strauss et al., 2008; Davies et al., 2011). Pairs of F1Fo ATP synthase particles from opposite faces of the lipid bilayer interact via their c-rings and are related to each other by a ∼90° rotation (Figure 5A).

The interaction of c-rings in the membrane is best observed when viewing a cross-section of the map along the crystallographic a-axis (Figure 5C). In this view, it becomes apparent that the pairs of opposing c-rings and the long axes of the F1Fo ATP synthases include an angle of 16° with the crystal plane. Therefore, in order for the c-rings to be fully embedded in the membrane, the lipid bilayer within the 2D crystals must adopt a zigzag topology, as observed in the vesicle cross-sections (Figure 2). To assess whether the Fo domain of the bovine F1Fo ATP synthase could in fact account for this curvature, we placed the segmented volume of the single-particle map of this enzyme (Baker et al., 2012) into our extended sub-tomogram average. To our surprise, the bend of the micelle-embedded membrane region of the single-particle map perfectly matched the kink in the membrane that is required to hold successive c-rings together (Figure 5D,E). Thus the packing of F1Fo ATP synthases into the 2D crystal strongly supports the notion that the membrane domain of the monomeric bovine heart F1Fo ATP synthases is inherently bent and that this is sufficient to impose a local curvature on the lipid bilayer.

Crystal packing analysed by crystallographic processing of selected z-slices

The subtomogram average lacks well-defined density in the membrane-embedded part of the complex. Therefore, we validated our packing model by crystallographic image processing. Z-slices through the tomographic volume at the levels of the catalytic (αβ)3 hexamer, the stalk region and the membrane-embedded domain, which all showed sharp diffraction spots to the third order, were transformed into projection images and processed by electron crystallographic routines without applying symmetry (Figure 6, Figure 6—figure supplement 1 and Figure 6—figure supplement 2) (Henderson et al., 1986; Crowther et al., 1996).

Figure 6. Projection maps of different z-slices in a 2D crystal of F1Fo ATP synthases.

(A) Side view of crystal packing from Figure 4. (B) Projection images (left) calculated from z-slices of the tomographic volume at z-height positions indicated by black bars in (A), their Fourier transforms (centre) and projection maps (right). (C) z-slices through the crystal packing in (A) corresponding to the position of the projection maps shown in (B). (AC) Protein densities observed in the projection maps perfectly match the features shown in the corresponding z-slices of the crystal-packing model. Dashed orange outlines indicate a pair of F1Fo ATP synthases, red boxes indicate the unit cell of the crystal with dimensions of a = 179.1 Å, b = 171.4 Å, γ = 94.9°. Red arrowheads in the lower panel of (B) indicate lines of continuous protein density in the membrane plane.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06119.017

Figure 6.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1. Flow chart of electron crystallographic image processing of a tomographic volume.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

Figure 6—figure supplement 2. Unit cell parameters and crystal symmetry.

Figure 6—figure supplement 2.

(A) Projection images of tomographic z-slices containing the whole single-layered 2D crystal were processed to determine unit cell parameters and crystal symmetry. Image processing was performed using the MRC image processing programmes. (A) Projection image (left); Fourier transform (center); Fourier synthesis map (right). The red circle indicates the (0, 1) reflection. (B) The programme ALLSPACE did not indicate a clear plane-group symmetry for the 2D lattice.

The resulting projection maps were plotted at 30 Å resolution and showed good correlation with the crystal-packing model (Figure 6). The catalytic (αβ)3 hexamer map featured twofold symmetric particles that were connected via a small protrusion due to the peripheral stalk. The stalk region showed four distinct densities related by a twofold rotation. The larger, more distal density corresponded to the central stalk and the thinner, more elliptical density to the peripheral stalk. For the membrane region, where no clear protein density is observed in the subtomogram average, continuous density is observed in the direction of the proposed c-ring/Fo interaction, but not in the perpendicular direction (Figure 6). Thus, the zigzag membrane geometry observed in Figure 5C was due to the membrane region of the F1Fo ATP synthase.

Discussion

We have reconstituted intact bovine heart F1Fo ATP synthase into lipid bilayers. Due to the mild conditions during protein purification and reconstitution, the protein remained stable and active for several weeks outside mitochondria. This enabled us to study the structure of F1Fo ATP synthase in situ in a lipid bilayer. Sub-tomogram averaging of 2D crystals revealed the structure of bovine heart F1Fo ATP synthase in the membrane to approximately 24 Å. A model of molecular packing, determined by repositioning the sub-tomogram average into the tomographic volume, indicates that the membrane domain of the monomeric F1Fo ATP synthase from bovine heart bends the lipid bilayer.

Map resolution

Our structure of the bovine heart F1Fo ATP synthase reconstituted into a lipid bilayer is consistent with the monomeric detergent-solubilised complex determined by single-particle analysis (Baker et al., 2012). Even though the resolution of our sub-tomogram average at 24 Å is nominally less good than that of the single-particle map at 18 Å, several features are more clearly resolved. This includes the densities of the central and peripheral stalks, the OSCP subunit and the α- and β-subunits, which are clearly separated in the sub-tomogram average (Figure 4). This may be a result of the more accurate particle alignment, which used 3D volumes rather than 2D projection images. In fact, Baker et al. (2012) recently reported that by reducing their data set by 82% to include only the best projection images, structural features of their cryo-EM map became clearer, although the nominal resolution, determined by the Fourier shell correlation, was unchanged. The resolution of our sub-tomogram average is about 1.5× better in the x–y plane than the z direction due to the single orientation of F1Fo ATP synthase particles in the crystal relative to the missing wedge of information (Radermacher, 1988).

The peripheral stalk

In our sub-tomogram average, the peripheral stalk is positioned along the non-catalytic αβ interface as previously reported (Rees et al., 2009; Baker et al., 2012) but is more offset towards the α-subunit than in the x-ray structure (Rees et al., 2009; Figure 4). A small connecting density visible between the midpoint of the peripheral stalk and α-subunit may account for this difference. A similar connection is seen in the single-particle cryo-EM map of the bovine complex (Baker et al., 2012). Analysis of the fitted x-ray structure suggests possible ionic interactions between subunit d and residues 463–475 of the α-subunit, which is the point where the structures of the α and β-subunits diverge (Walker et al., 1982). This additional contact may help the peripheral stalk in its role as a stator, but may also prevent the stalk from interfering with the catalytic cycle of the β-subunit by pulling it away from the α/β interface. Alternatively, the peripheral stalk may be pulled away from the α/β interface by its interactions in the membrane.

The dominant density of the peripheral stalk in the sub-tomogram average suggests that this region is more rigid than other parts of the complex. In accordance with this, we were able to fit the bovine heart peripheral stalk fragment (Dickson et al., 2006) extended by several residues from the F1-peripheral stalk structure (Rees et al., 2009) into the density as a rigid body without the need to introduce hinges as previously suggested (Baker et al., 2012) (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). This fit therefore challenges the notion that the peripheral stalk acts as a flexible linker that stores torque or elastic energy during the catalytic cycle (Sorgen et al., 1998; Sorgen et al., 1999). This hypothesis was based on the bacterial enzyme, which has a peripheral stalk consisting of only two long alpha helices. The bovine peripheral stalk, in contrast, consists of one long alpha helix plus subunits d, F6 and the N-terminal domains of other Fo subunits, which would generate a more rigid structure (Dickson et al., 2006). A rigid peripheral stalk would hold the (αβ)3 hexamer in a stationary position relative to the membrane. This is probably more important in mitochondria than in bacteria, as the mitochondrial F1Fo ATP synthase has another important role in generating local membrane curvature and maintaining cristae morphology through the formation of dimer rows (Davies et al., 2012). The dimer interface is located at the base of the peripheral stalk (Davies et al., 2011, 2012) and thus any flexibility in the structure of the peripheral stalk may compromise the formation and stability of the dimer.

The membrane region

Despite the prominent structural features visible in the membrane-extrinsic regions of the F1Fo ATP synthase, the membrane-embedded parts in our sub-tomogram average were not well-resolved (Figure 3). This was surprising as the c-ring, located directly beneath the central stalk, is easily visible in x-ray models filtered to 20 Å resolution. Therefore, if the sub-volumes are well enough aligned to give an overall resolution of 24 Å, we would expect to see the c-ring in the lipid bilayer. In our sub-tomogram average, we only see a weak density for the c-ring. The lack of detail in the membrane region is unlikely to be caused by the missing wedge as we have observed a similar phenomenon in sub-tomogram averages of other membrane proteins, which have no missing wedge of information, and in single-particle maps when the resolution does not extend beyond 15 Å. The extent of this problem appears to correlate with the composition of the surrounding lipid or detergent. Thus, the lack of protein density in the membrane region for our averages at this resolution seems to be caused mainly by contrast matching between the surrounding lipid and protein.

2D crystal processing of tomographic slices

The projection images generated from selected z-slices of tomographic volumes enabled us to use electron crystallographic image processing, even though the coherently packed areas of the 2D crystals were small. This improved the signal-to-noise ratio because noise originating from additional crystal layers or surrounding buffer was removed in silico by careful selection of the z-slices and Fourier filtering of the diffraction pattern. Thus 2D processing of tomographic 3D crystal volumes poses an attractive alternative for the electron crystallographic treatment of small 2D crystals of large membrane complexes that are not accessible to canonical image processing due to limited size and order. As exemplified in our 2D crystal of the F1Fo ATP synthase, the molecular packing of multi-subunit membrane complexes with large extramembranous domains can be complicated with multiple layers and multiple tilt angles relative to the crystal plane. These are circumstances under which projection maps alone are easily misinterpreted and our approach of combining electron tomography with electron crystallography enables a straightforward interpretation (Gerle et al., 2006; Tani et al., 2013).

F1Fo ATP synthase and membrane curvature

In mitochondria, the F1Fo ATP synthase forms rows of dimers along the highly curved ridges of cristae membranes (Strauss et al., 2008; Davies et al., 2011). Disruption of dimers prevents the formation of wild-type cristae and increases the generation time of the organism (Paumard et al., 2002; Davies et al., 2012). Molecular dynamics simulations have shown that the F1Fo ATP synthase dimer structure alone is sufficient to bend the lipid bilayer and drive row formation (Davies et al., 2012). In addition, single-particle cryo-EM of mitochondrial ATP synthase complexes indicates that the bend of the dimer may originate from the structure of the Fo domain in a single monomer (Baker et al., 2012).

Through our analysis of the F1Fo ATP synthase packing in 2D crystals, we have shown that the Fo domain of monomeric bovine heart F1Fo ATP synthase indeed induces a substantial kink in the lipid bilayer (Figures 5, 6) explaining in molecular terms the zigzag appearance of the membrane in the 2D crystals (Figure 2). When two monomeric complexes join to form a dimer in the inner mitochondrial membrane, the resulting angle between the long axes of the monomers would be ∼86° (Figure 7) exactly as observed in the subtomogram averages of the bovine F1Fo ATP synthase dimer (Davies et al., 2012). This dimer angle gives rise to the high local curvature of membranes required to shape the cristae (Davies et al., 2012). We conclude that the F1Fo monomer is the basic building block of the ATP synthase dimer rows. Newly assembled monomeric complexes of the bovine heart F1Fo ATP synthase monomers would converge on pre-existing regions of high membrane curvature where they assemble into dimers, thus propagating the self-association of dimers into rows.

Figure 7. Monomeric mitochondrial F1Fo ATP synthase as the factor determining cristae membrane curvature.

Figure 7.

(A) Schematic diagram of bovine F1Fo ATP synthase in the 2D crystal lattice, with its transmembrane Fo stator domain imposing a local 43° kink and a 16° inclination of the c-ring relative to the crystal plane. Blue, stator; red, rotor. (B) Schematic diagram of a single monomeric bovine F1Fo ATP synthase. CS: central stalk; PS: peripheral stalk; IMS: intermembrane space; TM Fo: transmembrane domain of Fo. (C) Association of two monomeric F1Fo complexes into a dimer results in an angle of 86°, as observed in ATP synthase dimers in mitochondrial cristae (Davies et al., 2012).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06119.020

Perspective

Using a combination of electron cryo-tomography, sub-tomogram averaging, and electron crystallography, we have determined the structure of an F1Fo ATP synthase in a lipid bilayer. This in vitro system is free from additional proteins, the enzyme is fully functional, and the proteoliposomes are in principle proton-tight. Therefore, this system may be suitable for studying the effect of physiological parameters such as ∆pH, ∆pmf, and substrate availability on the structure and function of F1Fo ATP synthase (Walker, 2013). In addition, with the recent advancements in electron detector development and image processing methods in cryo-EM, it may soon be possible to generate tomographic volumes with sub-nanometer resolution routinely (Schur et al., 2013). This resolution should be sufficient to determine whether the structure of the enzyme changes under different physiological conditions. Only when these questions are answered will we really understand how the F1Fo ATP synthase works in the membrane.

Materials and methods

Purification of intact F1Fo ATP synthase from bovine heart mitochondria

F1Fo ATP synthase was purified by a published procedure (Maeda et al., 2013). Briefly, sub-mitochondrial particles in 40 mM HEPES pH 7.8, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 0.1 mM DTT, isolated from fresh bovine hearts as described previously (Shinzawa-Itoh et al., 2010), were solubilized on ice by the addition of deoxycholate and decylmaltoside to final concentrations of 0.7% (wt/vol) and 0.4% (wt/vol), respectively. Subsequently, the suspension was centrifuged at 176,000×g for 50 min and the supernatant applied to a sucrose step gradient (40 mM HEPES pH 7.8, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM DTT, 0.2% [wt/vol] decylmaltoside and 2.0 M, 1.1 M, 1.0 M, or 0.9 M sucrose) and centrifuged overnight at 176,000×g for 15.5 hr. Fractions with ATPase activity were loaded onto a Poros-20HQ ion-exchange column and eluted by a linear concentration gradient of 0–240 mM KCl in 40 mM HEPES pH 7.8, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM DTT and 0.2% (wt/vol) decylmaltoside. F1Fo ATP synthase fractions containing high amounts of native phospholipids were concentrated to 10 mg/ml (Advantec Ultra filter, polysulfone, MWCO 200 kDa, Toyo Roshi, Tokyo, Japan).

Membrane reconstitution and two-dimensional crystallisation

Synthetic, chemically pure 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL) was solubilised in decylmaltoside and mixed with freshly purified bovine F1Fo ATP synthase at a lipid to protein ratio of 0.2. After overnight incubation on ice, the detergent was removed by dialysis using 20 μl Hampton dialysis buttons (Hampton Research, Aliso Viejo, CA) (membrane cutoff 15,000 Da, SpectraPor#7, Spectrum, Los Angeles, CA) and 500 ml of dialysis buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.2, 100 mM NaCl, 0.02% [wt/vol] NaN3, 0.5 mM ADP, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM EDTA). The dialysis buffer was exchanged daily and the sample was incubated at 27°C for 10 to 21 days.

ATPase activity measurement, gel electrophoresis, and mass spectrometry

To determine the specific enzymatic activity and the proportion of coupled complexes of both the isolated F1Fo ATP synthases and the crystalline vesicles resolubilized with 4% (wt/vol) digitonin, an ATP-regenerating enzyme-coupled assay was used (Pullman et al., 1960). The hydrolysis of ATP by the F1Fo ATP synthase was followed by NADH oxidation at 340 nm at 20°C in the absence or presence of oligomycin. To confirm the subunit composition and intactness of the bovine F1Fo ATP synthase, crystalline vesicles, resolubilized with sodium dodecyl sulfate were examined by denaturing SDS-PAGE and vesicles resolubilized with 4% (wt/vol) digitonin by non-denaturing blue-native PAGE (Wittig et al., 2006). The presence of the lower molecular weight subunits (5000–12,000 Da) of the F1Fo ATP synthase in the crystalline vesicles was confirmed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (Bruker Daltonics Inc., MA, USA).

Negatively stained electron microscopy

2.5 µl of dialysed sample was applied to freshly glow-discharged, carbon-coated 400 mesh copper grids (Veco, Nisshin, Tokyo, Japan), blotted and stained with 2% uranyl acetate solution. Grids were screened using a JEM1010 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at 100 kV and images were acquired using a 2k × 2k slow-scan CCD camera (Gatan, Pleasanton, CA). Images were recorded at a magnification of 40,000×, which corresponds to a pixel size of 6 Å using a 2 s exposure.

Electron cryo-tomography

Samples of 2D crystals were screened by negative stain EM immediately before freezing. Samples containing well-ordered arrays of F1 heads were selected and mixed 1:1 with fiducial gold markers (6 nm gold particles conjugated to protein A, Aurion). 3 µl of the protein:gold sample were applied to glow-discharged quantifoil grids (R2/2, 300 copper mesh), blotted for 3 s (#4 Whatman paper, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI) and plunge-frozen in liquid ethane using a home-built freezing device. Single-axis tilt series (±60°, step size 1.5°) were collected on an FEI Krios microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR) operating at 300 kV and equipped with a post-column energy filter (GIF Quantum, Gatan) with a K2 summit direct detector in counting mode (Gatan). Images were taken with a specimen pixel size of 0.33 nm and a defocus of 2.5 µm. Tilt series were aligned using the gold fiducials and back-projected to generate tomographic volumes using the IMOD package (Kremer et al., 1996).

Sub-tomogram averaging

For particle picking, tomograms were binned 4 × 4 and filtered by nonlinear anisotropic diffusion to increase contrast (Frangakis and Hegerl, 2001). F1 subcomplexes were picked manually in 3dmod with the F1 subcomplexes of opposite orientation assigned to different files. Particles were separated randomly into two data sets and processed independently. Particle alignment was performed in PEET, starting with the contrast-enhanced binned 2 × 2 tomograms, then the binned 2 × 2 tomograms without contrast enhancement and finally the unbinned (1 × 1) volume. An initial reference volume was calculated for each data set by averaging all selected subvolumes on one side of the membrane. Subvolumes containing F1 subcomplexes from the opposite side of the membrane were rotated 180° about the x-axis prior to alignment. Alignment parameters were then restricted to ±45° about the x and y-axis, and 12 pixels in xyz. No restriction was placed on the z-axis rotation. Initial alignment was performed with a resolution limit of 60 Å and gradually lowered to 30 Å in accordance with the FSC. To assess over-fitting, phases beyond 40 Å in the tomogram were randomized and the last alignment iteration was repeated (Chen et al., 2013). The final average, calculated from 2500 subvolumes, was filtered to 18 Å using a Fermi filter with a temperature factor of 0.002 px−1 (Frank, 1996). Fourier shell correlation was performed in PEET using a box size of 96 voxels. Atomic models were docked into the EM density using the sequential fit routine of Chimera and superimposed using the matchmaker command (Pettersen et al., 2004). Electron density maps of atomic models were calculated in CCP4 (Winn et al., 2011).

Image analysis of tomographic slices

Two types of projection images were prepared from tomographic volumes of a single vesicular 2D crystal (for a flow chart see Figure 6—figure supplement 1). To determine the lattice parameters, a projection image of a single-layered 2D crystal was calculated from the corresponding z-slices of the tomographic volume by first extraction and conversion into a projection image using the IMOD package (Kremer et al., 1996) (Figure 6—figure supplement 2A—left panel) and then processing the projection images using the MRC image processing programmes (Crowther et al., 1996) (Figure 6—figure supplement 2A, middle and right panel). The unit cell parameters of the crystal were: a = 179.1 Å, b = 171.4 Å, γ = 94.9°. As the programme ALLSPACE (Valpuesta et al., 1994) indicated only one plane of symmetry, data were merged in p1 (Figure 6—figure supplement 2B). The single-layered 2D crystal in the tomographic volume was subdivided along the z-axis and a total of 64 projection images were generated at an interval spacing of 6.66 Å, corresponding to the sampling size of the tomographic volume. All images were processed with the MRC image processing programmes to correct for crystal lattice distortion (Henderson et al., 1986). Only a few reflections had statistically significant amplitudes beyond 30 Å resolution and all projection maps were calculated within a 30 Å resolution limit.

Acknowledgements

We would like to like to thank Yoshito Kaziro for help and advice during the planning stages of the project and Shinya Yoshikawa for encouragement and support. We gratefully acknowledge Kazumi Kobayashi for maintenance of the JEOL electron microscopes and Tomoko Maeda for assistance with F1Fo ATP synthase purification and John Heumann for writing the randomised phase program for tomographic data. This work was supported by the Max Planck Society (KMD, DJM, and WK), the Cluster of Excellence Frankfurt ‘Macromolecular Complexes’ supported by the DFG (KMD and WK), the Special Coordination Fund for Promoting Science and Technology of MEXT, Japan (to CG), a Platform for Drug Design, Discovery and Development grant from MEXT, Japan (to CG), the JST/CREST (to TT and CG), a Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) from MEXT, Japan, the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) and the National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (to YF) and a Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) from MEXT, Japan (to KT). Establishment, continuous execution and improvement of bovine F1Fo ATP synthase purification was supported by a Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (to SY and KS) from MEXT, Japan, a Grants-in-Aid for the Global Center of Excellence Program (to SY and KS) from MEXT, Japan and a Targeted Protein Research Program (to SY and KS) from MEXT, Japan.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft to Karen M Davies, Deryck J Mills, Werner Kühlbrandt.

  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Cluster of Excellence Frankfurt “Macromolecular Complexes” to Karen M Davies, Werner Kühlbrandt.

  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) Special Coordination Fund to Christoph Gerle.

  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) Platform for Drug Design, Discovery and Development grant to Christoph Gerle.

  • New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organisation (NEDO) to Yoshinori Fujiyoshi.

  • National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NIBIO) to Yoshinori Fujiyoshi.

  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency (CREST, JST) to Tomitake Tsukihara, Christoph Gerle.

  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research to Yoshinori Fujiyoshi, Kazutoshi Tani, Kyoko Shinzawa-Itoh.

  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) Grants-in-Aid for the Global Center of Excellence Program to Kyoko Shinzawa-Itoh.

  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) Targeted Protein Research Program to Kyoko Shinzawa-Itoh.

Additional information

Competing interests

WK: Reviewing editor, eLife.

The other authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Author contributions

CJ, Performed protein purification, Biochemical assays, 2D crystallization and negative stain EM.

KMD, Initiated the project, Designed research, Performed cryo-EM, Tomographic data analysis and modelling, Analyzed the data, Interpreted the results, Wrote the manuscript.

KS-I, Established and performed protein purification and biochemical assays.

KT, Performed electron crystallographic image analysis, Discussed results.

SM, Performed protein purification and biochemical assays.

DJM, Assisted cryo-EM data accquisition.

TT, Contributed key reagents and discussed the results.

YF, Guided the project, Discussed results, Contributed key reagents.

WK, Initiated the project, Designed research, Analysed the data, Interpreted the results, Wrote the manuscript.

CG, Conceived and initiated the project and designed research, Analyzed the data, Interpreted the results, Wrote the manuscript.

Additional files

Major datasets

The following datasets were generated:

Jiko C, Davies KM, Shinzawa-Itoh K, Tani K, Maeda S, Mills DJ, Tsukihara T, Fujiyoshi Y, Kühlbrandt W, Gerle C, 2015, Sub-tomogram average of a mammalian F-type ATP synthase monomer, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/entry/emdb/EMD-2982, Publicly available at the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) at PDBE.

Jiko C, Davies KM, Shinzawa-Itoh K, Tani K, Maeda S, Mills DJ, Tsukihara T, Fujiyoshi Y, Kühlbrandt W, Gerle C, 2015, Raw images of two tilt-series obtained from mammalian F1Fo 2D crystals that were used for tomographic reconstructions, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/emdb/empiar/entry/10027I, Publicly available at the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) at PDBE.

The following previously published datasets were used:

Rees DM, Leslie AGW, Walker JE, 2009, The structure of the membrane extrinsic region of bovine ATP synthase, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=2WSS, Publicly available at RCSB Protein Data Bank 2WSS.

Kane Dickson V, Silvester JA, Fearnley IM, Leslie AGW, Walker JE, 2006, Subcomplex of the stator of bovine mitochondrial ATP synthase, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=2CLY, Publicly available at RCSB Protein Data Bank 2CLY.

Watt IN, Montgomery MG, Runswick MJ, Leslie AGW, Walker JE, 2010, Crystal structure of bovine F1-C8 sub-complex of ATP synthase, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=2XND, Publicly available at RCSB Protein Data Bank 2XND.

Abrahams JP, Leslie AG, Lutter R, Walker JE, 1994, Bovine mitochondrial F1-ATPase, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=1BMF, Publicly available at RCSB Protein Data Bank 1BMF.

References

  1. Abrahams JP, Leslie AG, Lutter R, Walker JE. Structure at 2.8 A resolution of F1-ATPase from bovine heart mitochondria. Nature. 1994;370:621–628. doi: 10.1038/370621a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allegretti M, Klusch N, Mills DJ, Vonck J, Kühlbrandt W, Davies KM. Horizontal membrane-intrinsic α -helices in the stator a-subunit of an F-type ATP synthase. Nature. 2015 doi: 10.1038/nature14185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker LA, Watt IN, Runswick MJ, Walker JE, Rubinstein JL. Arrangement of subunits in intact mammalian mitochondrial ATP synthase determined by cryo-EM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 2012;109:11675–11680. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204935109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyer PD. The ATP synthase–a splendid molecular machine. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 1997;66:717–749. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen S, McMullan G, Farugi AR, Murshudov GN, Short JM, Scheres SH, Henderson R. High-resolution noise substitution to measure overfitting and validate resolution in 3D structure determination by single particle electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy. 2013;135:24–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crowther RA, Henderson R, Smith JM. MRC image processing programs. Journal of Structural Biology. 1996;116:9–16. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davies KM, Anselmi C, Wittig I, Faraldo-Gómez JD, Kühlbrandt W. Structure of the yeast F1Fo ATP synthase dimer and its role in shaping the mitochondrial cristae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 2012;109:13602–13607. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204593109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies KM, Daum B. Role of cryo-ET in membrane bioenergetics research. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2013;41:1227–1234. doi: 10.1042/BST20130029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies KM, Strauss M, Daum B, Kief JH, Osiewacz HD, Rycovska A, Zickermann V, Kühlbrandt W. Macromolecular organization of ATP synthase and complex I in whole mitochondria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 2011;108:14121–14126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103621108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dickson VK, Silvester JA, Fearnley IM, Leslie AG, Walker JE. On the structure of the stator of the mitochondrial ATP synthase. The EMBO Journal. 2006;25:2911–2918. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fujiyoshi Y, Unwin N. Electron crystallography of proteins in membranes. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2008;18:587–592. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Frangakis AS, Hegerl R. Noise reduction in electron tomographic reconstructions using nonlinear anisotropic diffusion. Journal of Structural Biology. 2001;135:239–250. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Frank J. Three-dimensional electron microscopy of macromolecular assemblies. Academic Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gerle C, Tani K, Yokoyama K, Tamakoshi M, Yoshida M, Fujiyoshi Y, Mitsuoka K. Two-dimensional crystallization and analysis of projection images of intact Thermus thermophilus V-ATPase. Journal of Structural Biology. 2006;153:200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Henderson R, Baldwin JM, Downing KH, Lepault J, Zemlin F. Structure of purple membrane from halobacterium halobium: recording, measurement and evaluation of electron micrographs at 3.5 Å resolution. Ultramicroscopy. 1986;19:147–178. doi: 10.1016/0304-3991(86)90203-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kremer JR, Mastronarde DN, McIntosh JR. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. Journal of Structural Biology. 1996;116:71–76. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lau WC, Baker LA, Rubinstein JL. Cryo-EM structure of the yeast ATP synthase. Journal of Molecular Biology. 2008;382:1256–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Maeda S, Shinzawa-Itoh K, Mieda K, Yamamoto M, Nakashima Y, Ogasawara Y, Jiko C, Tani K, Miyazawa A, Gerle C, Yoshikawa S. Two-dimensional crystallization of intact F-ATP synthase isolated from bovine heart mitochondria. Acta Crystallographica Section F, Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications. 2013;69:1368–1370. doi: 10.1107/S1744309113029072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Meyer B, Schägger H, Wittig I, Karas M, Trifilieff E. Identification of two proteins associated with mammalian ATP synthase. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 2007;6:1690–1699. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M700097-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Muench SP, Trinick J, Harrison MA. Structural divergence of the rotary ATPases. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics. 2011;44:311–356. doi: 10.1017/S0033583510000338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Paumard P, Vaillier J, Coulary B, Schaeffer J, Soubannier V, Mueller DM, Brèthes D, di Rago J-P, Velours J. The ATP synthase is involved in generating mitochondrial cristae morphology. The EMBO Journal. 2002;21:221–230. doi: 10.1093/emboj/21.3.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Penczek PA, Frank J. Resolution in electron tomography. New York: Electron tomography Springer; 2006. pp. 307–330. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 2004;25:1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pullman ME, Penefsky HS, Datta A, Racker E. Partial resolution of the enzymes catalyzing oxidative phosphorylation. I. Purification and properties of soluble dinitrophenol-stimulated adenosine triphosphatase. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1960;235:3322–3329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pruggnaller S, Mayr M, Frangakis AS. A visualization and segmentation toolbox for electron microscopy. Journal of structural biology. 2008;164:161, 165. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2008.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Radermacher M. Three‐dimensional reconstruction of single particles from random and nonrandom tilt series. Journal of Electron Microscopy Technique. 1988;9:359–394. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1060090405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rees DM, Leslie AG, Walker JE. The structure of the membrane extrinsic region of bovine ATP synthase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 2009;106:21597–21601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910365106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rubinstein JL, Walker JE, Henderson R. Structure of the mitochondrial ATP synthase by electron cryomicroscopy. The EMBO Journal. 2003;22:6182–6192. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Runswick MJ, Bason JV, Montgomery MG, Robinson GC, Fearnley IM, Walker JE. The affinity purification and characterization of ATP synthase complexes from mitochondria. Open Biology. 2013;3:120160. doi: 10.1098/rsob.120160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Scheres SH, Chen S. Prevention of overfitting in cryo-EM structure determination. Nature Methods. 2012;9:853–854. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schur FK, Hagen WJ, de Marco A, Briggs JA. Determination of protein structure at 8.5 Å resolution using cryo-electron tomography and sub-tomogram averaging. Journal of Structural Biology. 2013;184:394–400. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Shinzawa-Itoh K, Seiyama J, Terada H, Nakatsubo R, Naoki K, Nakashima Y, Yoshikawa S. Bovine heart NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase contains one molecule of ubiquinone with ten isoprene units as one of the cofactors. Biochemistry. 2010;49:487–492. doi: 10.1021/bi9016318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sorgen PL, Bubb MR, Cain BD. Lengthening the second stalk of F(1)F(0) ATP synthase in Escherichia coli. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1999;274:36261–36266. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.51.36261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sorgen PL, Caviston TL, Perry RC, Cain BD. Deletions in the second stalk of F1Fo ATP synthase in Escherichia coli. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1998;273:27873–27878. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.43.27873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Stock D, Leslie AG, Walker JE. Molecular architecture of the rotary motor in ATP synthase. Science. 1999;286:1700–1705. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5445.1700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Strauss M, Hofhaus G, Schröder RR, Kühlbrandt W. Dimer ribbons of ATP synthase shape the inner mitochondrial membrane. The EMBO Journal. 2008;27:1154–1160. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2008.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tani K, Arthur CP, Tamakoshi M, Yokoyama K, Mitsuoka K, Fujiyoshi Y, Gerle C. Visualization of two distinct states of disassembly in the bacterial V-ATPase from Thermus thermophilus. Microscopy. 2013;62:467–474. doi: 10.1093/jmicro/dft020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Valpuesta JM, Carrascosa JL, Henderson R. Analysis of electron microscope images and electron diffraction patterns of thin crystals of Ø29 connectors in ice. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1994;240:281–287. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. von Ballmoos C, Wiedenmann A, Dimroth P. Essentials for ATP synthesis by F1Fo ATP synthases. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2009;78:649–672. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.081307.104803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Walker JE. The ATP synthase: the understood, the uncertain and the unknown. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2013;41:1–16. doi: 10.1042/BST20110773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Walker JE, Saraste M, Runswick MJ, Gay NJ. Distantly related sequences in the alpha-and beta-subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and otherATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold. The EMBO Journal. 1982;1:945–951. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01276.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Watt IN, Montgomery MG, Runswick MJ, Leslie AGW, Walker JE. Bioenergetic cost of making an adenosine triphosphate molecule in animal mitochondria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA. 2010;107:16823–16827. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011099107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Winn MD, Ballard CC, Cowtan KD, Dodson EJ, Emsley P, Evans PR, Keegan RM, Krissinel EB, Leslie AG, McCoy A, McNicholas SJ, Murshudov GN, Pannu NS, Potterton EA, Powell HR, Read RJ, Vagin A, Wilson KS. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallographica Section D, Biological Crystallography. 2011;67:235–242. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910045749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wittig I, Braun H, Schägger H. Blue native PAGE. Nature Protocols. 2006;1:418–428. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
eLife. 2015 Mar 27;4:e06119. doi: 10.7554/eLife.06119.021

Decision letter

Editor: Sjors HW Scheres1

eLife posts the editorial decision letter and author response on a selection of the published articles (subject to the approval of the authors). An edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the substantive concerns or comments; minor concerns are not usually shown. Reviewers have the opportunity to discuss the decision before the letter is sent (see review process). Similarly, the author response typically shows only responses to the major concerns raised by the reviewers.

Thank you for sending your work entitled “Bovine F1Fo ATP synthase monomers bend the lipid bilayer in 2D membrane crystals” for consideration at eLife. Your article has been evaluated by John Kuriyan (Senior editor), a Reviewing editor, and four reviewers, and we invite you to submit a revision.

The following individuals responsible for the peer review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Sjors Scheres (Reviewing editor) and Henning Stahlberg (peer reviewer). Three other reviewers remain anonymous.

The Reviewing editor and the reviewers discussed their comments before we reached this decision, and the Reviewing editor has assembled the following comments to help you prepare a revised submission.

All reviewers much appreciated the fact that 2D crystals of active and intact complexes were obtained, as well as the novel image processing procedures that were used to analyse the tomographic data of these crystals. All reviewers also agreed that the main conclusion of the paper, that the membrane part of the F1Fo ATP synthase monomer by itself bends the lipid bilayer, is very interesting and supportive of earlier results. However, a majority of the reviewers did feel that this conclusion needs additional experimental evidence. In particular the fact that the zig-zag pattern of the monomers is only inferred from the crystal packing, and not observed directly, was judged to be an important weakness of the current manuscript. This should be adequately addressed in a revised version. Possible options discussed were the inclusion of a cross-section plot from the edges of a vesicular 2D crystal, the inclusion of subtomograms from such edges in the averaging procedure to decrease the effects of the missing wedge on the membrane region in the subtomogram average, recording dual-axis tomograms to 70°, or recording images on cryo-sections of crystals.

In addition, two reviewers raised concerns about the possibility to distinguish between different conformations of the alpha/beta pairs at this resolution. Such claims should be backed by more information about the fittings of the different conformations in the maps. In addition, to exclude that random noise in the map could lead to one conformation fitting better than another, the authors could refine two halves of the data independently (i.e. gold-standard procedure, so a FSC=0.143 criterion could be used to assess resolution) and perform the fittings of the different conformations in both half-maps.

Lastly, it was felt that Figure 6 is not representative of the actual results in the paper. It should contain a panel with the relative orientations of the monomers in the 2D crystal, and how the 20° inclination of the c-ring, together with the 2D crystal lattice parameters, lead to the same 43° angle as observed in the single-particle reconstruction (which also isn't very clear from the paper). This figure should also show that the crystal packing is actually very different from the 86° dimer.

Minor comments:

How was the resolution of the tomography reconstruction of 21Å determined? The authors list FSC 0.5 as criterion. But was any Gold Standard method applied here? What about reference bias?

Why is the unit cell given as p1 symmetry? This should be p121b or something similar. Or do the authors merely state that they didn't apply any symmetrization? If so, then they should state it as such.

Figure 1–figure supplement 3A should have reference markers.

It would be helpful to have an introductory sentence in the Results section describing the crystalline vesicles so that the reader can understand that '2D crystals', 'crystalline tubes', 'rectangular-shaped vesicles', 'tubular 2D crystals', and 'tubular crystals' all mean the same thing.

Figure 1: the fact that there are many more ATPase heads on the insides of the vesicles than on the outsides (whereas there should be equal numbers) suggests there may be some degradation, despite the biochemical analyses suggesting the enzyme is complete and active?

I cannot understand Figure 1–figure supplement 3. Why do the gels show mixtures of monomers and dimers, and why do the digitonin-resolubilised 2D crystals have a larger proportion of dimers? I don't understand the significance of the two curves in B. They need to be explained more fully in the caption.

The discussion on the membrane region (first paragraph of the subsection headed “The membrane region”) is not good. The lack of detail in the membrane region is surely due simply to poor resolution perpendicular to the membrane associated with the (quite substantial) missing wedge. It is not a contrast-matching issue. Analyses of helical tubes, where there is no such missing information, have demonstrated clearly that densities of a protein are well contrasted against the lipid bilayer at resolutions near 20Å, and certainly do not require a resolution of 8Å to be visible.

eLife. 2015 Mar 27;4:e06119. doi: 10.7554/eLife.06119.022

Author response


All reviewers much appreciated the fact that 2D crystals of active and intact complexes were obtained, as well as the novel image processing procedures that were used to analyze the tomographic data of these crystals. All reviewers also agreed that the main conclusion of the paper, that the membrane part of the F1Fo ATP synthase monomer by itself bends the lipid bilayer, is very interesting and supportive of earlier results. However, a majority of the reviewers did feel that this conclusion needs additional experimental evidence. In particular the fact that the zig-zag pattern of the monomers is only inferred from the crystal packing, and not observed directly, was judged to be an important weakness of the current manuscript. This should be adequately addressed in a revised version. Possible options discussed were the inclusion of a cross-section plot from the edges of a vesicular 2D crystal, the inclusion of subtomograms from such edges in the averaging procedure to decrease the effects of the missing wedge on the membrane region in the subtomogram average, recording dual-axis tomograms to 70°, or recording images on cryo-sections of crystals.

Thank you for this suggestion. We have now visualized the zigzag membrane morphology directly by collecting tomograms of crystalline vesicles in thick vitreous ice (>200nm). One of these vesicles was optimally orientated relative to the electron beam to reveal the zigzag membrane structure both in projection and in cross-sections of the tomographic volume. These images have been compiled into a new figure, which is now Figure 2.

In addition, two reviewers raised concerns about the possibility to distinguish between different conformations of the alpha/beta pairs at this resolution. Such claims should be backed by more information about the fittings of the different conformations in the maps. In addition, to exclude that random noise in the map could lead to one conformation fitting better than another, the authors could refine two halves of the data independently (i.e. gold-standard procedure, so a FSC=0.143 criterion could be used to assess resolution) and perform the fittings of the different conformations in both half-maps.

We have recalculated the FSC using gold standard and randomized phase procedures. In addition, we have made a direct comparison of our subtomogram average to a low-resolution map generated by Fourier filtering the x-ray structure of the F1-subcomplex to 25 Å. The different positions of the alpha/beta subunits in the hexamer are clearly visible at this resolution (Figure 3–figure supplement 2) but not their different conformations. We have thus deleted the sentence “the conformation of each /β pair varies within the hexamer, suggesting different functional states” from the manuscript.

Lastly, it was felt that Figure 6 is not representative of the actual results in the paper. It should contain a panel with the relative orientations of the monomers in the 2D crystal, and how the 20° inclination of the c-ring, together with the 2D crystal lattice parameters, lead to the same 43° angle as observed in the single-particle reconstruction (which also isn't very clear from the paper). This figure should also show that the crystal packing is actually very different from the 86° dimer.

As requested, we have added a new panel (Figure 7A) to the previous Figure 6 (now Figure 7) to show the orientation of the ATP synthase monomers in the 2D crystals relative to the crystal lattice parameters. This panel clearly illustrates the ∼20° (actually 16°, the more accurate angle now used throughout the paper) inclination of the c-ring relative to the 2D crystal plane which results in the membrane forming two 43° bends in order to embedded neighbouring invert c-ring pairs in the bilayer.

Panels B and C of Figure 7 (previously panels A and B of Figure 6) illustrate how the angles observed in the 2D crystal relates to the ATP synthase monomer and dimer.

Minor comments:

How was the resolution of the tomography reconstruction of 21Å determined? The authors list FSC 0.5 as criterion. But was any Gold Standard method applied here? What about reference bias?

The resolution of 21Å was calculated by splitting the dataset in two after alignment. There was no reference bias as the initial model was calculated ab initio from the subvolumes.

We have now repeated the subtomogram averaging using gold standard procedures and included a gold standard FSC analysis on averages calculated from tomograms with phases randomized beyond 40 Å resolution (Figure 3–figure supplement 1). We have also expanded the description of the subtomogram averaging procedure in the Methods section.

Why is the unit cell given as p1 symmetry? This should be p121b or something similar. Or do the authors merely state that they didn't apply any symmetrization? If so, then they should state it as such.

The crystals are poorly ordered, and the programme ALLSPACE did not detect a clear, plane group symmetry (Figure 6–figure supplement 1B). Thus all 2D processing was performed without symmetry applied.

Figure 1–figure supplement 3A should have reference markers.

The point of BN-PAGE shown in Figure 1–figure supplement 3 was to demonstrate that protein reconstituted into vesicles and stored at 27°C for three weeks was of equal quality to freshly purified protein, in particular absence of degradation, disassembly or aggregation. Thus the migration profile of proteins solubilized from three-week-old 2D crystals using digitonin (lane 3 and 4) was directly compared to freshly purified bovine F1Fo ATP synthases (lane 1 and 2). The aim of this gel was simply to show that both samples behave in the same way, which they do, and not to determine the molecular mass of the ATP synthase monomer and dimer. These molecular masses are well known, so the bands act as their own markers, far better than any extrinsic marker of soluble proteins would do for a blue native PAGE of a membrane protein. The migration behavior of membrane protein complexes on such a gel is highly dependent not only on the size and charge of the protein but also the shape and amount of bound lipids or detergents.

It would be helpful to have an introductory sentence in the Results section describing the crystalline vesicles so that the reader can understand that '2D crystals', 'crystalline tubes', 'rectangular-shaped vesicles', 'tubular 2D crystals', and 'tubular crystals' all mean the same thing.

We have simplified the terminology and now just use the terms: crystalline vesicles and rectangular crystalline vesicles. The latter contains 2D crystals, which showed the highest degree of crystalline order.

Figure 1: the fact that there are many more ATPase heads on the insides of the vesicles than on the outsides (whereas there should be equal numbers) suggests there may be some degradation, despite the biochemical analyses suggesting the enzyme is complete and active?

We can exclude proteolytic degradation as a cause of missing ATPase heads, as the blue-native gel in Figure 1–figure supplement 3 shows clearly that this is not the case. We agree that Figure 1B in the original manuscript did seem to suggest that there were more ATPase heads on the inside. However, this figure was not representative, as the apparent number of ATPase heads on either side of the membrane depends on the exact position of the tomographic slice relative to the 2D lattice and the curvature of the membrane at the edge of the vesicle. In the revised manuscript, we have replaced Figure 1B by a new figure, in which the plane of the slice was chosen more carefully to indicate roughly similar numbers of heads on either side of the membrane. This is also evident from Figure 1D and from the new Figure 2 in the revised manuscript.

I cannot understand Figure 1–figure supplement 3. Why do the gels show mixtures of monomers and dimers, and why do the digitonin-resolubilised 2D crystals have a larger proportion of dimers? I don't understand the significance of the two curves in B. They need to be explained more fully in the caption.

The F1Fo ATP synthase form rows of dimers in mitochondrial cristae (Davies et al., 2012). To isolate the F1Fo ATP synthase, these membranes were solubilized using decyl maltoside (DM). Although this detergent is relatively harsh, the purification procedure used in this study was mild enough to retain a significant portion of F1Fo ATP synthase dimers. Therefore a clear dimer band is seen in lane 1 and 2, as expected.

The 2D crystals were solubilized using the very mild detergent digitonin. It is well known that this detergent preserves oligomeric assemblies of mitochondrial F1Fo ATP synthase dimers upon membrane solubilisation. In the 2D crystal, the F1Fo ATP synthase interacts strongly via its c-ring with complexes of opposite orientation and weakly with complexes of the same orientation via its peripheral stalk. Some of these interactions are likely to be maintained during the solubilisation of the 2D crystals with the mild detergent digitonin.

As digitonin is a milder detergent than DM, more protein-protein interactions are preserved when the 2D crystals are solubilized with digitonin than when the mitochondrial membranes are solubilized with DM. Hence the larger proportion of dimers in lanes 3 and 4 compared to lanes 1 and 2.

To explain the two curves in B more clearly, we added the following statement to the caption:

“Hydrolysis of ATP by the F1Fo ATP synthase was monitored using an enzyme couple assay by detecting NADH oxidation at 340 nm at 20°C in the absence (blue trace) or presence (green trace) of oligomycin. Oligomycin inhibits ATP hydrolysis by binding to and stopping rotation of the Fo motor, i.e. oligomycin sensitivity is a measure of the relative proportion of coupled, intact F1Fo ATP synthase complexes in the digitonin resolubilised 2D crystals, in this case > 95%.”

The discussion on the membrane region (first paragraph of the subsection headed “The membrane region”) is not good. The lack of detail in the membrane region is surely due simply to poor resolution perpendicular to the membrane associated with the (quite substantial) missing wedge. It is not a contrast-matching issue. Analyses of helical tubes, where there is no such missing information, have demonstrated clearly that densities of a protein are well contrasted against the lipid bilayer at resolutions near 20Å, and certainly do not require a resolution of 8Å to be visible.

In our crystallographic projection map Fourier filtering allowed the visualization of transmembrane protein density in the presence of a dense and intact lipid bilayer even at 30 Angstrom resolution and a strong missing wedge. This is because the lipid bilayer has no regular order, and the Fourier terms originating from the membrane are filtered out during the masking of the protein diffraction pattern. A similar process also occurs during helical reconstructions, which means the signal from the protein is enhanced whereas the signal from disordered lipid is removed. In contrast, subtomogram averaging is conducted using real space cross correlation-based methods and all Fourier terms including those from the membrane contribute to the final average. This means both contrast matching and the missing wedge greatly affects the final average and both are likely to be important causes for the absence of transmembrane density in our subtomogram average.

The lack of protein density in the membrane region of our subtomogram average is not a consequence of the missing wedge. We have calculated subtomogram averages of several membrane-embedded ATP synthases that were randomly orientated in the tomographic volume. We found that every single average lacks protein density in the membrane region. We know from the single-particle averages of ATP synthase dimers (Allegretti et al., Nature 2015) published by us (KMD, WK) since the present manuscript was submitted that the c-ring density is seen clearly only at 10Å resolution or better, where membrane-spanning helices begin to become visible. At lower resolution, the mean scattering densities of the protein and surrounding lipid or detergent are too similar to show a clear boundary.


Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

RESOURCES