Abstract
We designed and synthesized two novel nitrobenzoxadiazole (NBD) analogues of the anticancer agent 6-((7-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazol-4-yl)thio)hexan-1-ol (NBDHEX). The new compounds, namely MC3165 and MC3181, bear one and two oxygen atoms within the hydroxy-containing alkyl chain at the C4 position of the NBD scaffold, respectively. This insertion did not alter the chemical reactivity with reduced glutathione, while it conferred a remarkable increase in water solubility. MC3181 was more selective than NBDHEX towards the target protein, glutathione transferase P1-1, and highly effective in vitro against a panel of human melanoma cell lines, with IC50 in the submicromolar-low micromolar range. Interestingly, the cellular response to MC3181 was cell-type-specific; the compound triggered a JNK-dependent apoptosis in the BRAF-V600E-mutated A375 cells, while it induced morphological changes together with an increase in melanogenesis in BRAF wild-type SK23-MEL cells.
MC3181 exhibited a remarkable therapeutic activity against BRAF-V600E-mutant xenografts, both after intravenous and oral administration. Outstandingly, no treatment-related signs of toxicity were observed both in healthy and tumor-bearing mice after single and repeated administrations.
Taken together, these results indicate that MC3181 may represent a potential novel therapeutic opportunity for BRAF-mutated human melanoma, while being safe and water-soluble and thus overcoming all the critical aspects of NBDHEX in vivo.
Keywords: Glutathione Transferase P1-1; c-Jun N-terminal Kinase; 6-((7-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazoles; Human Melanoma Xenografts
INTRODUCTION
Malignant melanoma is the most aggressive skin cancer, and its incidence continues to rise worldwide. In stage 0, I and II (localized) disease, surgical excision of the primary tumor is associated with a cure rate of over 95%. However, in stage III (regional lymph node metastasis) and stage IV (distant metastasis) disease, surgical interventions are of limited value, and systemic therapy becomes the only treatment option. Unlike dacarbazine, temozolomide and interleukin-2, the recently approved ipilimumab and vemurafenib drugs improve median overall survival in metastatic melanoma patients [1–3], but nonetheless there is still a high unmet need for more effective and safer systemic therapies.
Both intrinsic and acquired mechanisms are thought to be responsible for the multidrug-resistant phenotype of melanoma cells. Among these, overexpression of glutathione transferase (formerly glutathione S-transferase, GST) P1-1 may play an important role. This dimeric cytosolic protein is overexpressed in many untreated human tumors, including melanoma, and is well known to catalyze the detoxification of some electrophilic anticancer drugs via conjugation to reduced glutathione (GSH) [4–8]. Furthermore, GSTP1-1 is often co-expressed with the multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1) in melanoma, and acts in a combined fashion with this export pump to protect melanoma cells from some cytotoxic agents [9, 10].
Beside its detoxifying function, GSTP1-1 has a regulatory role in signal transduction, interacting with different members of the Mitogen-Activate Protein Kinase (MAPK) pathway. Activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)-mediated MAPK signaling occurs in response to several anticancer agents including those causing DNA breaks, such as temozolomide [11]. The association of GSTP1-1 with both JNK1 and the up-stream adaptor protein TNF-Receptor Associated Factor 2 (TRAF2) results in impairment of the MAPK pathway, leading to inhibition of apoptosis [12–15].
This evidence prompted us to synthesize and screen non-GSH-peptidomimetic GSTP1-1 inhibitors bearing a nitrobenzoxadiazole (NBD) moiety. Among them, the most effective was NBDHEX. This compound behaves as a “mechanism-based inhibitor” of GSTP1-1 [16] leading to the activation of the apoptotic pathway in a variety of human cancer cell lines [17–20]. We recently demonstrated that NBDHEX exhibits in vitro cytotoxicity at low micromolar concentrations, and significant in vivo therapeutic activity towards Me501 and A375 human melanomas [21]. In addition, NBDHEX synergize with temozolomide both in vitro and in vivo, without worsening the myelotoxic activity of the methylating agent [22]. However, NBDHEX suffers from relatively low target selectivity being a high-affinity ligand of the widely-expressed GSTM2-2 [23], and from having poor water solubility, which limits its oral bioavailability and hinders the development of drug formulations suitable to parenteral administration. These findings led us to search for novel NBDHEX analogues with a better pharmacological profile.
Based on the crystal structure of NBDHEX bound to either GSTP1-1 or GSTM2-2 [24], we recently designed, synthesized and screened for water solubility, GSTP1-1 selectivity and in vitro tumor cell cytotoxicity, 40 new NBDHEX analogues [25]. As a further development of these studies, here we report the synthesis and chemical characterization of two additional NBDHEX analogues, namely MC3165 and MC3181; they are characterized by the presence of one and two oxygen atoms within the hydroxy-containing alkyl chain at the C4 position of the NBD scaffold, respectively. These compounds have been designed with the aim of increasing the water-solubility while minimizing the changes into the NBD nucleus, to avoid any significant drop of cytotoxic potency. Both compounds have been assayed for water solubility, chemical stability and ability to form a distinctive σ-complex intermediate with GSH [16]. Moreover, we examined their inhibition strength towards both GSTP1-1 and GSTM2-2, and the degree of selectivity towards GSTP1-1. The most promising compound, MC3181, was further studied in vitro both for ability to affect the interaction between GSTP1-1 and JNK1 or TRAF2, and for antitumor efficacy against a panel of human melanoma cell lines. Finally, host toxicity and antitumor efficacy of MC3181 upon its intravenous (i.v) or oral administration were assessed in vivo in healthy animals and mice bearing different human melanoma xenografts.
RESULTS
MC3165 and MC3181 preparation
As described in Fig. 1, MC3165 and MC3181 were obtained by a nucleophilic displacement reaction between the commercial 4-chloro-7-nitrobenzo[c] [1,2,5]oxadiazole and the 2-(2-mercaptoethoxy)ethanol and the 2-(2-(2-mercaptoethoxy)ethoxy)ethanol, respectively. The mercapto alcohols were prepared from the commercially available 2-(2-chloroethoxy)ethanol and 2-(2-(2-chloroethoxy)ethoxy)ethanol through a reaction with thiourea in refluxing water under an inert atmosphere, followed by the basic hydrolysis of the hydrochloride intermediates under reflux conditions. The 2-(2-mercaptoethoxy)ethanol and the 2-(2-(2-mercaptoethoxy)ethoxy)ethanol were finally reacted with the 4-chloro-7-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole in an ethanol:water (1:3) mixture, in the presence of pyridine at room temperature, providing the desired compounds, MC3165 and MC3181.
Chemical and physical properties of MC3165 and MC3181
The molecular weights, extinction coefficients, and the aqueous solubility profiles at different pH values of MC3165, MC3181 and their parent compound, NBDHEX, are reported in Table 1.
Table 1. Molecular weights, extinction coefficients and solubility limits.
Compound | Mol. Weight (Da) | ε 425 nm (mM−1cm−1) | Solubility (mM) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH 7.4* | pH 5.0^ | pH 2.0^ | |||
NBDHEX | 297.3 | 15.0 ± 0.1° | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
MC3165 | 285.3 | 20.0 ± 0.4 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 2.0 |
MC3181 | 329.3 | 16.4 ± 0.2 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 9.0 |
0.1 M K-Phosphate buffer,
0.1 M Na-Acetate Buffer, °433 nm.
Data represent means ± SD
Replacement of the n-hexanol chain of NBDHEX with a 2-(ethoxy)ethanol moiety (MC3165) led to a 20-fold increase in water solubility at all the examined pH values. Insertion of two oxygen atoms within the hydroxy-containing alkyl chain of NBDHEX (MC3181) further improved hydrophilicity resulting in a more than 50-fold increase in aqueous solubility.
Spontaneous reactivity of MC3165 and MC3181 with GSH
The potential of the novel NBD derivatives to spontaneously form GSH-conjugates, that might be rapidly extruded from the cell by specific membrane transporters such as MRP1/2 [26], was evaluated spectrophotometrically. Addition of an excess of GSH to MC3165, MC3181 or NBDHEX solutions in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) at 25°C, caused only a small decrease in the absorbance at 430 nm (less than 15% decrease of the absorbance value within 1 h), and a comparable increase in the absorbance band in the 350 nm region (Fig. 2A). Collectively these results indicate a negligible spontaneous reactivity of all of the examined compounds towards GSH.
Sigma complex formation in the GSTP1-1 active Site
As already observed with NBDHEX [16], GSTP1-1 strongly increased the reaction rate between GSH and the new NBD derivatives. The spectral band of MC3165 and MC3181 in the 430 nm region disappeared immediately upon their incubation with GSH and GSTP1-1, and was replaced by a typical σ-complex band centered at 350 nm (Fig. 2B) [16]. The nature of the substituent bound to the sulphur atom influenced the stability of the σ-complex, which was in the rank order NBDHEX > MC3181 > MC3165 (Fig. 2B).
Inhibition of GSTP1-1 and GSTM2-2 conjugation activity by MC3165 and MC3181
To evaluate the degree of selectivity of the novel NBD derivatives against the GSTP1-1 isoform, the IC50 values of each compound towards the catalytic activity of both GSTP1-1 and GSTM2-2 were determined, and used for calculation of a selectivity index (SI, IC50GSTP1-1/IC50GSTM2-2 ratio, see Table 2). While MC3165 had a SI comparable to that of its parent compound (Table 2), MC3181 displayed a 3-fold lower SI than NBDHEX, thus indicating a greater selectivity towards GSTP1-1. Based on these findings, MC3181 was selected for further in vitro and in vivo investigations as a potential therapeutic antimelanoma agent.
Table 2. Inhibitory activities of NBDHEX, MC3165 and MC3181 against GSTP1-1 and GSTM2-2.
Compound | IC50 (μM) | Selectivity Index IC50GSTP1-1/IC50GSTM2-2 | |
---|---|---|---|
GSTP1-1 | GSTM2-2 | ||
NBDHEX | 0.8 ± 0.1 | ≤ 0.01 | ≥ 80 |
MC3165 | 4.0 ± 0.2 | 0.051±0.008 | 78 |
MC3181 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 0.081±0.013 | 32 |
IC50 values were calculated by fitting the binding curves to the Equation 1
(see Methods section). Data represent means ± SD
MC3181 disrupts protein-protein interactions involving GSTP1-1
We recently demonstrated that NBDHEX is able to disrupt the interaction between GSTP1-1 and the MAPK pathway members JNK1 [14] and TRAF2 [15]. Therefore, the effects of MC3181 on these protein-protein complexes were evaluated. Under our experimental conditions, GSTP1-1 resulted bound to JNK1α2 and TRAF2 with Kd values in the nanomolar range (0.42 ± 0.02 μM and 0.28 ± 0.02 μM, respectively; Fig. 3 and Table 3). The presence of GSH remarkably affected the binding properties of GSTP1-1, shifting the Kd values for JNK1α2 and TRAF2 to 2.2 ± 0.1 μM and 3.0 ± 0.3 μM, respectively. Moreover, the addition of MC3181, further hindered the formation of the GSTP1-1-protein complexes leading to Kds > 5–10 μM.
Table 3. Protein-protein interaction between GSTP1-1 and JNK1α2 or TRAF2.
Protein-protein complex | Kd (μM) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
-- | + GSH | + GSH+ NBDHEX | + GSH+ MC3181 | |
JNK1α2-GSTP1-1 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | > 10* | ≥ 5 |
TRAF2-GSTP1-1 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 3.0 ± 0.3 | ≥ 5^ | ≥ 10 |
The Kds of the complexes were calculated by fitting the binding curves to the Equation 1
(see Methods section). Data represent means ± SD. References * (14 ), ^ (15).
In vitro antitumor efficacy of MC3181 towards a panel of human melanoma cell lines
The antitumor efficacy of MC3181 towards five cultured human melanoma cell lines was compared with that of NBDHEX. A375, G-361, MALME-3M and IST-MEL-1 are cell lines harboring the BRAF-V600E mutation, whereas SK23-MEL are BRAF wild-type melanoma cells. Results, summarized in Table 4, show that the IC50 values of MC3181 were in the low micromolar range (0.8–2.4 μM), and comparable to that recorded for NBDHEX
Table 4. Cell growth inhibition studies in human melanoma cell lines.
Cell line | IC50 (μM) | |
---|---|---|
NBDHEX | MC3181 | |
A375 | 1.45 ± 0.14 | 2.31 ± 0.04 |
SK23-MEL | 1.19 ± 0.09 | 1.79 ± 0.05 |
G-361 | 0.55 ± 0.03 | 0.78 ± 0.04 |
MALME-3M | 1.80 ± 0.12 | 2.42 ± 0.16 |
IST-MEL-1 | 1.42 ± 0.05 | 0.92 ± 0.07 |
Cells were exposed to different concentrations (0.05–50 μM) of MC3181 or NBDHEX for 48 h. The IC50 values for each compound were then evaluated by the SRB assay
Analysis of cell death induced by MC3181 in A375 and SK23-MEL cells
A strong inhibition of cell proliferation was observed in both A375 and SK23-MEL cells treated with MC3181 at concentrations about 4-fold higher than their IC50 values, i.e. 10 and 7 μM, respectively (Fig. 4A).
Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle perturbations induced by MC3181 in A375 cells revealed a time-dependent increase in the number of cells blocked in the G2/M phase and a concomitant increase in the amount of cells in the sub-G1 phase (about 27 and 36% increase after 24 and 48 hrs, respectively; Fig. 4B, left panel and Fig. 5, panels B and C). A noticeable cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase was also observed in MC3181-treated SK23-MEL cells, whereas the drug-induced increase in the number of cells in sub-G1 phase was less pronounced than that recorded in A375 cells (about 10 and 20% increase after 24 and 48 hrs of treatment, respectively; Fig. 4B, right panel and Fig. 5, panel E). These differences translated into a different degree of caspase activation; a strong caspase-3 activity (Fig. 4C, left panel) was observed in drug-treated A375 cells, while MC3181 induced only a negligible increase of proteolitic activity in SK23-MEL cells (Fig. 4C, right panel).
To get better insight into the mechanism of cell death induced by MC3181, apoptosis was assessed by flow cytometry upon annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) staining. The analysis was performed after 24 and 48 hrs of exposure to the drug in the A375 cell line, and after 48 hrs of drug treatment in SK23-Mel cells, since, in these cells, apoptosis was negligible at 24 hrs. Results of these experiments are summarized in Figure 5. Early (Ann+/PI−) and late (Ann+/PI+) apoptotic cell death but not necrosis was recorded in both cell lines. The percentage of total apoptotic cells in A375 cells was approximately 23 and 37% at 24 and 48 hrs post-treatment, respectively (Fig. 5, panel A); the percentage of total apoptotic cells for SK23-Mel cells (Fig. 5, panel D) was about 20% after 48 hrs of treatment, in agreement with the results obtained with the PI staining.
MC3181 activates JNK in A375 and SK23-MEL cell lines
Subsequent experiment examined the ability of MC3181 to activate the MAP kinase JNK1. Treatment of A375 cells caused a sustained increase in JNK phosphorylation, starting within 1 hour after the addition of the drug (Fig. 4D, left panel); a more transient phospho-activation of JNK was observed in SK23-MEL cells, treated with an equitoxic concentration of MC3181 (Fig. 4D, right panel).
Pretreatment of A375 cells with the JNK inhibitor SP600125 (20 μM), reduced by about 40% the increase in the number of cells in Sub-G1 phase (Fig. 5B and 5C), and by about 50% the increase of caspase-3 activity (Fig. 5C), elicited by a 24 hrs exposure to MC3181. Collectively, these data confirm the role of JNK in the apoptotic response triggered by MC3181 in A375 cells.
MC3181 induces morphological changes in SK23-MEL cells
SK23-MEL cells are a mixture of spindle and polydendritic cells expressing markers indicative of cells at a late stage of melanocyte differentiation. A 48 hrs treatment with MC3181 caused clear morphological changes, shifting towards a bipolar spindle morphology (Fig. 5F). As the expression of late markers usually correlates with an increase of pigment content and a higher tyrosinase activity [27], we evaluated the impact of MC3181 treatment on cell tyrosinase activity and melanin content. Forty-eight hrs exposure to the drug, produced a significant increase in both melanin content (p < 0.05), and tyrosinase activity (p < 0.005), (Fig. 5C).
Antitumor efficacy of MC3181 in human melanoma xenograft models
MC3181 doses and schedules were decided on the basis of both drug solubility properties and of explorative toxicology studies carried out in CD-1 mice, which were treated using either the i.v. or the oral route of administration. The maximum administrable dose of MC3181 (i.e. 8 mg/kg), which was dictated by its acqueous solubility, was given to mice using either the i.v. or the oral route and according to a q1dx5 schedule for 3 weeks without inducing apparent gross toxicity signs and weight loss (data not shown). Moreover, no microscopic differences were detectable in the structure of all organs between treated and untreated groups (Fig. 6A and 6B), thus demonstrating that the compound was safe at the tested dose schedule.
Initially, the antitumor efficacy of MC3181 was investigated on the fast-growing A375 human melanoma model implanted s.c. as fragments, to better reproduce the tumor cell/stromal architecture. Animals (n = 7 mice/group) were treated i.v. with MC3181 (8mg/kg/d, q1dx5 for three weeks), or i.p. with a reference drug, TMZ (100 mg/kg/d, q1dx5), starting 10 days after tumor implant. MC3181 and TMZ treatments significantly delayed tumor growth from day 13 onward (P < 0.05; Fig. 7A, left panel); moreover, Kaplan–Meier analysis disclosed a significant increase in survival between treated and control mice (p < 0.05 for TMZ and p < 0.005 for MC3181, Fig. 7A, right panel), and fulfilled %ILS values of 53% and 35% for MC3181- and TMZ-treated animals, respectively.
A second set of experiments was performed in mice s.c.-injected with SK23-MEL or G-361 human melanoma cells (n = 6 mice/group), to compare the efficacy of MC3181 upon its administration by the i.v. or the oral route. In the case of the wild-type BRAF SK23-MEL cells, both treatments induced a certain degree of delay in tumor growth (Fig. 7B, left panel), but nonetheless effects appeared quite limited, and did not result in an improvement in survival (ILS < 20%) (Fig. 7B, right panel).
Conversely, treatment of the BRAF-mutated G-361 melanoma tumors produced highly remarkable data. Indeed, while both administration routes led to a significant delay in tumor growth, the oral delivery outperformed the i.v. counterpart, and was also capable of inducing stabilization and regression of the disease in half of the treated mice (Fig. 7C, left panel). These effects strongly impacted on the overall survival, as in the group receiving MC3181 orally, 50% of animals were still alive at the end of the observation period (Fig. 7C, right panel), thus clearly indicating the superior antitumor efficacy of the oral route.
As in the case of in vivo toxicology trials, all of the animals evaluated in the therapeutic activity experiments were monitored for signs of drug toxicity by frequent observation and regular body weight (BW) measurements over the course of the study (Fig. 8). Overall, MC3181 was tolerated very well, with no signs of adverse effects and a decrease in BW lower than 3%. Moreover, macroscopic examination of the vital organs of treated animals did not reveal any alteration. The reference compound, TMZ, caused almost 15% of BW loss during the period of treatment, and a complete recovery only after its interruption (Fig. 8).
Histological analysis
At the end of the observation period, mice were sacrificed and an autopsy was performed. Gross examination of internal organs by a stereo-microscope did not show any significant lesion or metastatic nodules. Melanoma nodules were analyzed for morphology, proliferation and apoptosis. SK23-MEL control tumors showed small, highly proliferating cells (Fig. 9A, left panel). On the contrary, the MC3181-treated SK23-MEL tumors mainly contained epithelioid-shaped tumoral cells, characterized by large eosinophilic cytoplasm (Fig. 9A, right panel). In addition, some cells of drug-treated SK23-MEL xenografts showed melanin production, never observed in the control tumors.
In A375 tumors, we could not detect significant differences between the proliferation status of MC3181-treated and untreated tumors, as the extensive necrosis reduced the sampling areas to the tumor periphery. However, MC3181 treatment resulted in a significant increase of JNK phosphorylation and caspase-3 activity (see Fig. 9B). Moreover, higher apoptosis (about 20%) was still detectable in MC3181-treated tumor xenografts, compared to untreated controls (data not shown).
DISCUSSION
The NBD derivative NBDHEX is a potent GST inhibitor, which has proven to be highly effective both in vitro and in vivo in various tumor models, including human melanoma xenografts [21, 22].
Recently, we designed, synthesized and characterized 40 new NBDHEX analogues, and found that the replacement of the hydroxyhexyl portion with an alkyl chain bearing polar substituents could be associated with a higher water solubility and a good cytotoxicity, compared to the parent compound [25]. Therefore, we extended our analysis to two novel alkyl analogues, named MC3165 and MC3181, which are characterized by the insertion of one and two oxygen atoms in the hexamethylene chain of NBDHEX, respectively.
Likewise NBDHEX, these new NBDs do not spontaneously react with GSH, whereas they form quite stable σ-complexes with this thiol in the GSTP1-1 active site. Overall, MC3181 showed overt improved chemical and physical properties compared to NBDHEX, i.e. a remarkable increase in water solubility and a higher selectivity towards the target protein, GSTP1-1. This prompted us to further investigate the mechanism of action of this novel compound, and to verify its activity at both cellular and in vivo levels.
MC3181 proved to be highly cytotoxic towards a panel of different human melanoma cell lines, as indicated by its IC50 values that were comparable, or in some cases slightly superior, to those recorded for the parent drug, NBDHEX. In particular, MC3181 efficiently inhibited proliferation of both the amelanotic and BRAF-mutated A375 cells, and of the melanotic and BRAF wild-type SK23-MEL cell line. On the other hand, the drug disclosed a different ability in inducing apoptosis in these two cell lines, suggesting a propensity for MC3181 to exert its antitumor activity against BRAF-mutated melanoma cells. Indeed, such observation was confirmed in vivo, as MC3181 proved not to be very effective in reducing tumor volume in SK23-MEL xenografts. However, unlike the untreated ones, MC3181-treated tumors, were characterized by cells with a large eosinophilic cytoplasm and producing melanin, consistent with the increased melanogenesis observed in vitro.
Conversely, in the A375 model, both TMZ and MC3181 showed a comparable efficacy, but with remarkable benefits in terms of toxicity profile for MC3181.
Notably, administration of MC3181 in G-361 tumor-bearing mice revealed a correlation between its antitumor activity and the route of administration, as the oral treatment led not only to a powerful tumor growth inhibition, but also produced a significant improvement in the overall survival. Again, it has to be stressed that the treatment-related signs of toxicity were negligible or completely absent.
With regard to the mechanism of action, MC3181 appeared to disrupt the interaction of GSTP1-1 with both JNK and the scaffold protein TRAF2, which is essential for JNK activation. Indeed, multiple cellular pathways are implicated in the development of melanoma and drug resistance, and therefore their inhibition is considered to be a valid therapeutic strategy for melanoma patients. In particular, the MAP kinase MEK is constitutively activated in the BRAF mutated cells, and it is a target for inhibitors [28]. However, melanoma can be also targeted with selected kinase activators; in fact, several anticancer agents require the activation of the MAP kinase pathway mediated by JNK and p38 [29]; accordingly, our evidences confirm that the proapoptotic activity of MC3181 is dependent on JNK activation.
Another important consequence of our findings is the possibility to exploit the levels of activated JNK (phospho-JNK) as a biomarker of drug responsiveness to be utilized for patient selection, and to monitor tumor response.
Collectively, these results indicate that MC3181 is an agent endowed with a high safety profile and a good water-solubility, thus overcoming all of the critical aspects of NBDHEX administration in vivo. As this compound resulted active upon oral administration, and proved to be therapeutically effective against BRAF-mutated tumors at non-toxic doses, it may represent a high compliant new therapeutic opportunity for the treatment of melanoma patients.
METHODS
Recombinant proteins and chemicals
Human GSTM2-2, GSTP1-1, JNK1a2 and TRAF2 were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified as previously described [14, 15, 30]; protein concentration was determined using the Lowry colorimetric assay [31]. Unless specified otherwise, all chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich S.r.l. (Milan, Italy).
Chemistry
Melting points were determined on a Buchi 530 melting point apparatus. 1H-NMR spectra were recorded at 400 MHz using a Bruker AC 400 spectrometer; chemical shifts are reported in δ (ppm) units relative to the internal reference tetramethylsilane (Me4Si). Mass spectra were recorded on a API-TOF Mariner by Perspective Biosystem (Stratford, Texas, USA); samples were injected by an Harvard pump using a flow rate of 5–10 μL/min, and infused in the Electrospray system. All compounds were routinely checked by TLC and 1H-NMR. TLC was performed on aluminum-backed silica gel plates (Merck DC, Alufolien Kieselgel 60 F254) with spots visualized by UV light or using a KMnO4 alkaline solution. All solvents were reagent grade and, when necessary, were purified and dried by standard methods. Concentration of solutions after reactions and extractions involved the use of a rotary evaporator operating at reduced pressure of ~ 20 Torr. Organic solutions were dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich s.r.l., Milan (Italy) or from TCI Europe N.V., Zwijndrecht (Belgium), and were of the highest purity. As a rule, samples prepared for physical and biological studies were dried in high vacuum over P2O5 for 20h at temperatures ranging from 25 to 40°C, depending on the sample melting point.
General procedure for the preparation of 2-(2-((7-nitrobenzo[c] [1,2,5]oxadiazol-4-yl)thio)ethoxy)ethan-1-ol (MC3165) and 2-(2-(2-((7-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazol-4-yl)thio)ethoxy)ethoxy)ethanol (MC3181)
Example: 2-(2-(2-((7-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazol-4-yl)thio)ethoxy)ethoxy)ethanol (MC3181).
To a solution of 2-(2-(2-chloroethoxy)ethoxy)ethanol (1.74 mL, 12 mmol ) in 20 mL of H2O, thiourea is added (1.37 g, 18 mmol) and the resulting mixture is stirred under nitrogen atmosphere for 30 minutes; then, the reaction is refluxed for 18 hrs, always under an inert atmosphere. The mixture was then cooled at room temperature, a 5N NaOH solution (15 mL) added and the reaction refluxed again for 3 hrs. The solution obtained was acidified at 0–5°C with concentrated HCl until pH = 4 and the aqueous phase was extracted with CHCl3 (4 × 40 mL). The combined organic phases were therefore dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and evaporated under reduced pressure to provide 1.68 g of 2-(2-(2-mercaptoethoxy)ethoxy)ethanol as a colorless oil that was used in the next step without further purification. 1H-NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.60 (t, 1H, CH2OH), 2.45 (s (broad), 1H, HSCH2), 2.70 (q, 2H, CH2CH2SH), 3.67 (m, 8H, CH2CH2OCH2CH2OCH2CH2), 3.73 (t, 2H, SCH2CH2OH).
To a solution of 4-chloro-7-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazole (575 mg, 2.89 mmol) in 6 mL of a mixture EtOH:H2O (0.3:1) were added in sequence pyridine (0.54 mL, 6.8 mmol) and 2-(2-(2-mercaptoethoxy)ethoxy)ethanol (417.2 mg, 2.51 mmol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 hrs. At the end of the reaction the aqueous mixture was extracted with CHCl3 (4 × 10 mL). The combined organic phases were then dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered and evaporated under reduced pressure to obtain a brown solid crude, which was purified by column chromatography on silica gel eluting with a mixture CHCl3/CH3OH (150:1) to give the product as a yellow solid. Mp: 38–40°C (χ n-Hexane). Yield: 46%. 1H-NMR (DMSO): δ 3.38-3.42 (t, 2H, CH2OH), 3.45-3.60 (m, 8H, CH2CH2OCH2CH2OCH2CH2), 3.83 (t, 2H, CH2CH2S), 4.56 (t, 1H, CH2OH), 7.58 (d, 1H, H benzoxadiazole ring), 8.58 (d, 1H, H benzoxadiazole ring). MS-ESI m/z: 330 [M+H]+.
Solubility limits in aqueous buffers
Different amounts of MC3181 and MC3165 were dissolved in a fixed volume of 0.1M potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.4, or 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer at pH 5.0 or 2.0. The solutions obtained were separated from any undissolved matter by centrifugation at 15,000 g and evaluated for drug concentration by recording compound absorbance at 425 nm, using molar extinction coefficients calculated at the same wavelength with diluted standard solutions, prepared in the same matrices.
Reactivity towards GSH
The spontaneous reactivity of the NBDs with GSH was determined at 25°C by recording the UV-visible spectrum of each compound (40 μM) incubated with 1 mM GSH, in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, at different time points.
The ability of GSTP1-1 to stabilize the intermediate σ-complex formed between GSH and the compounds, was evaluated by recording the spectrum of each molecule (40 μM), in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, before and after the addition of a stoichiometric amount of GSTP1-1 and 1 mM GSH.
Inhibition of GSTP1-1 and GSTM2-2 conjugation activity
GST activity was determined spectrophotometrically at 340 nm (ε = 9,600 M−1 cm−1), as previously reported [32]. Inhibition experiments were performed by measuring GSTP1-1 (20 nM) or GSTM2-2 (5 nM) activities in the presence of various amounts of the selected NBD derivative (from 0.1 to 20 μM with GSTP1-1, and from 0.005 and 1 μM with GSTM2-2). Fifty percent inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calculated by fitting the data to Equation 1, where ν is the percentage of the saturated binding sites; [P]t is the total GST concentration and [L]t is the total inhibitor concentration, assuming a 1:1 interaction stoichiometry between the inhibitor and one GST subunit, as well as that the binding sites are equal and independent.
(Eq. 1) |
Protein-protein interaction
The protein-protein interaction between GSTP1-1 and JNK1α2 or TRAF2 recombinant proteins was evaluated in the absence or in the presence of either 1 mM GSH or a mixture of 1 mM GSH and 8 μM MC3181, as previously described [14, 15]. The equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd) of the complexes were calculated by fitting the binding curves to the Equation 1, where ν is the percentage of the saturated binding sites, [P]t is the total concentrations of TRAF2 or JNK1α2 and [L]t is the total concentrations of GSTP1-1 (monomers).
Cell culture and cell treatments
The following human melanoma cell lines were used throughout the study: A375, MALME-3M (American Type Culture Collection, ATCC; Manassas, VA); G-361, IST-MEL-1 (Interlab Cell Line Collection, ICLC, Genova, Italy); SK23-MEL cells were originally provided by Dr. T. Boon (Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Belgium).
All cell lines were profiled using DNA fingerprinting technology (AmpFlSTR Identifiler Plus PCR Amplification kit, Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The Short Tandem Repeat (STR) profiles of the analyzed cell lines were compared to DNA fingerprinting databases (i.e., ATCC, DMSZ). All the profiles analyzed showed a similarity higher than 80%.
A375 and SK23-MEL cells were grown in Dulbecco's MEM (EuroClone, Milan, Italy). IST-MEL-1 and MALME-3M were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (EuroClone). G-361 cells were maintained in Mc Coy's medium (EuroClone). All culture media were supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). Growth medium for IST-MEL-1, G-361 and SK23-MEL, cells was also supplemented with 25 mM HEPES (Lonza); medium for IST-MEL-1, MALME-3M and G-361 was also enriched with 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Lonza). Cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
For in vitro antitumor efficacy studies, cells (2×104 cells/cm2) were seeded in 96-well plates and cultured for 24 h, after which they were exposed to different concentrations (0.05–50 μM) of MC3181 or NBDHEX for 48 h. The IC50 values for each compound were then evaluated by the SRB assay [33].
The proapoptotic and antiproliferative effects of MC3181 were evaluated in A375 and SK23-MEL cell lines seeded in 75 cm2 flask (Corning) at a density of 20,000 cells/cm2. Forty-eight hrs after plating, cells were exposed to equitoxic concentrations of MC3181 (10 and 7 μM for A375 and SK23-MEL, respectively), then were harvested at different time points, counted using a Neubauer Chamber (after 1:1 dilution in Trypan Blue), and subjected to further analysis.
In a separate set of experiments, the A375 cell line was exposed to the JNK inhibitor SP600125 (20 μM), which was added 1 h before the addition of MC3181.
Western blot analysis
The cell pellet obtained at each time point was lysed as previously reported [17] and the protein concentration was determined using the Lowry colorimetric assay. Proteins (40 μg) were loaded on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto a PVDF membrane (GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, UK). Anti-P-JNK (Thr183 Tyr185) (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA), anti-JNK (Cell Signaling) and anti-β actin were used as primary antibodies. Anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling) were revealed with the ECL LiteAblot Extend (EuroClone). The ImageJ software was used to analyze the band intensities.
Cytofluorimetric analysis
Cell cycle analysis was performed at different times after treatment with equitoxic concentrations of MC3181. A375 and SK23-MEL cells, were fixed with 70% ethanol overnight, stained with PI staining buffer (50 mg/ml PI, 10 mg/ml RNAsi and 1% Triton X-100) and analyzed by a FACSCalibur (BD Bioscence, San Jose, CA, USA). The percentage of early apoptotic, late apoptotic, and necrotic cells was determined by simultaneous staining of cells with PI (2 μg/ml) and Annexin V-FITC (0.5 μg/ml) (Sigma Aldrich), according to manufacturer's protocol. Flow cytometric data were analyzed by the FlowJo 8.8.6 software (Tree Stare, Inc, Ashland, OR, USA).
Assessment of caspase-3 activity
Apoptosis was confirmed by measuring caspase-3 activity, at 25°C, in total cell lysates, using the model fluorescent peptide substrate N-Acetyl-Asp-Glu-Val-Asp-7-amido-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin (Ac-DEVD-AFC). Proteolytic cleavage of Ac-DEVD-AFC resulted in a fluorescence emission at 505 nm (excitation at 400 nm) [17]. Caspase activity was expressed as change in fluorescence per min, per 106 cells.
Determination of SK23-MEL melanin content and tyrosinase activity
Melanin content and tyrosinase activity of SK23-MEL cells were determined after 48 hrs incubation with MC3181 (7 μM). Cells (1×106) were lysed in 1M NaOH at 100°C, for 1 hour and then centrifuged at 15,000 g, for 20 minutes. The melanin content of the resulting supernatant was evaluated spectrophotometrically at 490 nm, to avoid interference from MC3181. Tyrosinase activity was examined by measuring spectrophotometrically at 475 nm the rate of L-DOPA oxidation to dopachrome over 1 hour at 37°C. Cells [1×106 in 40 μl of 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) containing 1% Triton X-100 and 1 mM PMSF] were disrupted by freezing and thawing and centrifuged at 15,000 g for 20 minutes at 4°C. The assay was started by addition of 100 μl of 2 mg/ml L-DOPA to 40 μl of supernatant. Tyrosinase activity was expressed as change in absorbance, per hour, per 106 cells.
In vivo explorative toxicology studies in mice
Procedures involving animals and their care were in conformity with institutional guidelines that comply with national and international laws and policies (D.L. 116/92 and subsequent implementing circulars), and experimental protocols were approved by the local Ethical Committee of Padua University (CEASA).
Multiple-dose toxicology studies were carried out in seven-week-old female CD-1 mice (Charles River, Calco, Italy). Animals were randomly assigned to each experimental group (n = 3/group) and were treated orally or intravenously with MC3181 (8 mg/kg dissolved in PBS), or PBS only (control group) for 5 consecutive days (q1dx5) followed by a 2-day wash-out. After 3 weeks of treatment, mice were sacrificed and organs collected for tissue injury assessment by H&E staining. Briefly, organs (intestine, liver, kidneys, spleen, heart, and lungs) were formalin-fixed (PFA 1%, Thermo Scientific, Milan, Italy) for 2 hrs and then transferred in PBS 20% sucrose (Sigma, Milan, Italy) for the H&E staining.
Toxicity was also evaluated in tumor-bearing mice on the basis of macroscopic autopsy findings, mainly in terms of alteration to the size and color of vital organs, and net BW reduction. The percentage of net BW variation, between the first day of treatment and sacrifice day (or day of interest), was evaluated according to the following equation:
(Eq. 2) |
In vivo human melanoma models and treatment
All in vivo experiments were performed using 6- to 8-wk-old male or female immunodeficient mice of different strains purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Calco) and housed in specific pathogen-free animal facilities.
With regard to the in vivo fragment tumor model, A375 cells were injected (1×107) subcutaneously (s.c.) into the right flank of an athymic Nude-Foxn1nu female mouse, and the established primary tumor was then removed and cut into fragments (2–3 mm diameter) and implanted s.c. into recipient mice. Animals were randomly divided in groups of 7 mice and treatment was initiated when a tumor volume of 0.12 ± 0.01 cm3 (mean ± SEM) was reached.
SK23-MEL and G-361 cells were injected s.c. (in both cases, 1×106) into the right flank of NOD/SCID and SCID male mice, respectively. Animals were randomly divided in groups of 6 mice and treatments were started at day 10 (SK23-MEL) and 14 (G-361), when tumors were clearly palpable.
MC3181, dissolved in PBS, was administered i.v. or orally q1dx5 for three weeks at a dose of 8 mg/kg/day.
The reference drug temozolomide, dissolved in DMSO/PBS 1:1 to a final concentration of 10 mg/ml, was administered i.p. q1dx5 at a dose of 100mg/kg/day.
Control groups consisted of PBS-administered mice.
Evaluation of antitumor efficacy in vivo
Primary tumor growth was determined for all animals by caliper measurement (minor and major axis length), three times per week, until they were sacrificed. Primary tumor volume was determined using the following equation:
(Eq. 3) |
where α and β are the minor and major axes, respectively.
The efficacy of the treatment was also analyzed by calculation of the percentage of Increase in Life Span (% ILS), since this analysis gives an evidence of clinical potency [34]. Survival endpoint for each animal was fixed at the day when tumor volume reached 1.0 cm3 (A375) or 0.4 cm3 (SK23-MEL and G-361), and data were used to plot the relative Kaplan-Meier curves. Treatment efficacy was then evaluated by comparing the Median Survival Time (MST) of treated group with the MST of control group, and expressed as percentage of ILS:
(Eq. 4)
Treatment was considered effective when % ILS > 20%.
Immunohistochemical analysis
At sacrifice, tumors were removed, formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded. All internal organs were fixed and paraffin embedded for the morphological study to evaluate drug effects in normal tissues. Three μm-thick sections were cut and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) [35]. Two observers blindly classified the tissues for necrotic areas, evaluated as percent of total area, mitosis number in 10 high power field randomly selected away from the ischemic necrosis.
Tissue-xenografts treated with 8 mg/kg of MC3181 were studied by immonohistochemistry to identify the activation of JNK (after 6 hrs) and apoptosis, characterized by immune-staining for Caspase3 (at the end of treatment). Briefly, 3-μm-thick sections were pre-treated with EDTA citrate pH 7.8, for 30 min, at 95°C and then incubated respectively with rabbit monoclonal anti-Phospho-SAPK/JNK (1:100, 81E11, Cell Signaling, Danvers Massachusetts, USA) and rabbit polyclonal anti-Caspase3, for 60 min (1:100, PA5-16335, ThermoFisher Scientific, Walthman, MA, USA). Washing were performed with PBS 4% + Tween20, pH 7.6, by UCS diagnostic. Reactions were revealed by HRP – DAB Detection Kit (UCS diagnostic).
Statistical analysis
All the in vitro experiments were repeated at least three times; results are presented as means ± SD. Statistical evaluation was done using the Student's t-test (two tailed).
Tumor volumes in in vivo studies (presented as means ± SEM) were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons. Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was performed to estimate the survival curves, and comparison of survivals between groups was performed using the log-rank test. The results were considered to be statistically significant at P < 0.05.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), project IG-10598 (A.M.C.); project IG-13121 and Special Program Molecular Clinical Oncology 5 per mille ID 10016 (A.R.); FIRB RBFR10ZJQT (A.M.); Progetto IIT-Sapienza (A.M.); Progetto Ateneo Sapienza 2013 (D.R.); PRIN 2012 (prot.2012CTAYSY) (D.R.); FILAS (E. B.); University of Padua, “Progetti Strategici di Ateneo 2011” (A.R.); Associazione Piccoli Punti, ONLUS, Padova (L.Q.).
Glossary
Abbreviations
- MC3165
2-(2-((7-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazol-4-yl)thio)ethoxy)ethan-1-ol
- MC3181
2-(2-(2-((7-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazol-4-yl)thio)ethoxy)ethoxy)ethanol
- NBDHEX
6-((7-nitrobenzo[c][1,2,5]oxadiazol-4-yl)thio)hexan-1-ol
- GST
glutathione transferase
- TMZ
temozolomide
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Kaufmann R, Spieth K, Leiter U, Mauch C, von den Driesch P, Vogt T, et al. Temozolomide in combination with interferon-alfa versus temozolomide alone in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma: a randomized, phase III, multicenter study from the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:9001–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Coit DG, Andtbacka R, Bichakjian CK, Dilawari RA, Dimaio D, Guild V, et al. Melanoma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009;7:250–75. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2009.0020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Garbe C, Eigentler TK, Keilholz U, Hauschild A, Kirkwood JM. Systematic review of medical treatment in melanoma: current status and future prospects. Oncologist. 2011;16:5–24. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mannervik B, Castro VM, Danielson UH, Tahir MK, Hansson J, Ringborg U. Expression of class Pi glutathione transferase in human malignant melanoma cells. Carcinogenesis. 1987;8:1929–32. doi: 10.1093/carcin/8.12.1929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Townsend DM, Tew KD. The role of glutathione S-transferase in anti-cancer drug resistance. Oncogene. 2003;22:7369–75. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ruzza P, Rosato A, Rossi CR, Floreani M, Quintieri L. Glutathione transferases as targets for cancer therapy. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2009;9:763–77. doi: 10.2174/187152009789056895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sau A, Pellizzari Tregno F, Valentino F, Federici G, Caccuri AM. Glutathione transferases and development of new principles to overcome drug resistance. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010;500:116–22. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2010.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Serrone L, Hersey P. The chemoresistance of human malignant melanoma: an update. Melanoma Res. 1999;9:51–8. doi: 10.1097/00008390-199902000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schadendorf D, Makki A, Stahr C, van Dyck A, Wanner R, Scheffer GL, et al. Membrane transport proteins associated with drug resistance expressed in human melanoma. Am J Pathol. 1995;147:1545–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Depeille P, Cuq P, Passagne I, Evrard A, Vian L. Combined effects of GSTP1 and MRP1 in melanoma drug resistance. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:216–23. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Picco V, Pages G. Linking JNK Activity to the DNA Damage Response. Genes Cancer. 2013;4:360–8. doi: 10.1177/1947601913486347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Adler V, Yin Z, Fuchs SY, Benezra M, Rosario L, Tew KD, et al. Regulation of JNK signaling by GSTp. EMBO J. 1999;18:1321–34. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.5.1321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu Y, Fan Y, Xue B, Luo L, Shen J, Zhang S, et al. Human glutathione S-transferase P1-1 interacts with TRAF2 and regulates TRAF2-ASK1 signals. Oncogene. 2006;25:5787–800. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.De Luca A, Federici L, De Canio M, Stella L, Caccuri AM. New insights into the mechanism of JNK1 inhibition by glutathione transferase P1-1. Biochemistry. 2012;51:7304–12. doi: 10.1021/bi300559m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.De Luca A, Mei G, Rosato N, Nicolai E, Federici L, Palumbo C, et al. The fine-tuning of TRAF2-GSTP1-1 interaction: effect of ligand binding and in situ detection of the complex. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1015. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2013.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ricci G, De Maria F, Antonini G, Turella P, Bullo A, Stella L, et al. 7-Nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole derivatives, a new class of suicide inhibitors for glutathione S-transferases. Mechanism of action of potential anticancer drugs. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:26397–405. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M503295200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Turella P, Cerella C, Filomeni G, Bullo A, De Maria F, Ghibelli L, et al. Proapoptotic activity of new glutathione S-transferase inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2005;65:3751–61. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Turella P, Filomeni G, Dupuis ML, Ciriolo MR, Molinari A, De Maria F, et al. A strong glutathione S-transferase inhibitor overcomes the P-glycoprotein-mediated resistance in tumor cells. 6-(7-Nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-ylthio)hexanol (NBDHEX) triggers a caspase-dependent apoptosis in MDR1-expressing leukemia cells. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:23725–32. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M604372200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sau A, Filomeni G, Pezzola S, D'Aguanno S, Tregno FP, Urbani A, et al. Targeting GSTP1-1 induces JNK activation and leads to apoptosis in cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant human osteosarcoma cell lines. Mol Biosyst. 2012;8:994–1006. doi: 10.1039/c1mb05295k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.De Luca A, Pellizzari Tregno F, Sau A, Pastore A, Palumbo C, Alama A, et al. Glutathione S-transferase P1-1 as a target for mesothelioma treatment. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:223–30. doi: 10.1111/cas.12061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pellizzari Tregno F, Sau A, Pezzola S, Geroni C, Lapenta C, Spada M, et al. In vitro and in vivo efficacy of 6-(7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-ylthio) hexanol (NBDHEX) on human melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:2606–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.06.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tentori L, Dorio AS, Mazzon E, Muzi A, Sau A, Cuzzocrea S, et al. The glutathione transferase inhibitor 6-(7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-ylthio)hexanol (NBDHEX) increases temozolomide efficacy against malignant melanoma. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:1219–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Awasthi YC, Sharma R, Singhal SS. Human glutathione S-transferases. Int J Biochem. 1994;26:295–308. doi: 10.1016/0020-711x(94)90050-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Federici L, Lo Sterzo C, Pezzola S, Di Matteo A, Scaloni F, Federici G, et al. Structural basis for the binding of the anticancer compound 6-(7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-ylthio)hexanol to human glutathione S-transferases. Cancer Res. 2009;69:8025–34. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rotili D, De Luca A, Tarantino D, Pezzola S, Forgione M, Morozzo della Rocca B, et al. Synthesis and Structure-Activity Relationship of New Cytotoxic Agents Targeting Human Glutathione S-Transferases. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;89:156–171. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.10.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Keppler D. Export pumps for glutathione S-conjugates. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;27:985–91. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(99)00171-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Houghton AN, Real FX, Davis LJ, Cordon-Cardo C, Old LJ. Phenotypic heterogeneity of melanoma. Relation to the differentiation program of melanoma cells. J Exp Med. 1987;165:812–29. doi: 10.1084/jem.165.3.812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Friday BB, Adjei AA. Advances in targeting the Ras/Raf/MEK/Erk mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade with MEK inhibitors for cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:342–6. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ohtsuka T, Buchsbaum D, Oliver P, Makhija S, Kimberly R, Zhou T. Synergistic induction of tumor cell apoptosis by death receptor antibody and chemotherapy agent through JNK/p38 and mitochondrial death pathway. Oncogene. 2003;22:2034–44. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lo Bello M, Battistoni A, Mazzetti AP, Board PG, Muramatsu M, Federici G, et al. Site-directed mutagenesis of human glutathione transferase P1-1. Spectral, kinetic, and structural properties of Cys-47 and Lys-54 mutants. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:1249–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB. Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J Biol Chem. 1974;249:7130–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Skehan P, Storeng R, Scudiero D, Monks A, McMahon J, Vistica D, et al. New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990;82:1107–12. doi: 10.1093/jnci/82.13.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Teicher BA, Andrews PA. Anticancer drug development guide: preclinical screening, clinical trials, and approval. 2. Totowa, N.J: Humana Press; 2004. pp. 99–124. Part II. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Carson FL, Hladik C. Histotechnology: a self-instructional text. 2. Chicago: ASCP Press; 1997. pp. 114–123. Chapter 6. [Google Scholar]