Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 30.
Published in final edited form as: Stroke. 2014 Jan 14;45(3):677–682. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002630

Impaired Cerebral Autoregulation Is Associated With Vasospasm and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Fadar Otite 1,*, Susanne Mink 1,*, Can Ozan Tan 1, Ajit Puri 1, Amir A Zamani 1, Aujan Mehregan 1, Sherry Chou 1, Susannah Orzell 1, Sushmita Purkayastha 1, Rose Du 1, Farzaneh A Sorond 1
PMCID: PMC4415505  NIHMSID: NIHMS684235  PMID: 24425120

Abstract

Background and Purpose

Cerebral autoregulation may be impaired in the early days after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between cerebral autoregulation and angiographic vasospasm (aVSP) and radiographic delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) in patients with SAH.

Methods

Sixty-eight patients (54±13 years) with a diagnosis of nontraumatic SAH were studied. Dynamic cerebral autoregulation was assessed using transfer function analysis (phase and gain) of the spontaneous blood pressure and blood flow velocity oscillations on days 2 to 4 post-SAH. aVSP was diagnosed using a 4-vessel conventional angiogram. DCI was diagnosed from CT. Decision tree models were used to identify optimal cut-off points for clinical and physiological predictors of aVSP and DCI. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to develop and validate a risk scoring tool for each outcome.

Results

Sixty-two percent of patients developed aVSP, and 19% developed DCI. Patients with aVSP had higher transfer function gain (1.06±0.33 versus 0.89±0.30; P=0.04) and patients with DCI had lower transfer function phase (17.5±39.6 versus 38.3±18.2; P=0.03) compared with those who did not develop either. Multivariable scoring tools using transfer function gain >0.98 and phase <12.5 were strongly predictive of aVSP (92% positive predictive value; 77% negative predictive value; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.92) and DCI (80% positive predictive value; 91% negative predictive value; area under the curve, 0.94), respectively.

Conclusions

Dynamic cerebral autoregulation is impaired in the early days after SAH. Including autoregulation as part of the initial clinical and radiographic assessment may enhance our ability to identify patients at a high risk for developing secondary complications after SAH.

Keywords: cerebrovascular circulation, subarachnoid hemorrhage, ultrasonography, Doppler


Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a devastating condition that affects ≈50 000 Americans yearly.1 Angiographic vasospasm (aVSP) and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality after SAH. Early and accurate prediction of these complications will help develop more effective treatments.

The clinical tools currently used to predict the development of secondary complications after SAH are not satisfactory.2 Although various clinical and radiographic factors have been associated with increased risk of vasospasm and DCI,3-6 multi-variable analyses showed that the combination of these factors is poorly predictive of risk.5 This suggests that other risk factors associated with vasospasm and DCI were omitted from these analyses. The effectiveness of cerebral autoregulation (ie, the ability of cerebrovasculature to buffer against changes in pressure) in SAH may be among these factors.

Cerebral autoregulation is increasingly recognized as a factor that requires evaluation in patients with SAH. Several studies have shown that early impairments in autoregulation are associated with vasospasm and DCI after SAH.7-14 Thus, including measures of autoregulation as part of risk scores may allow for more accurate prediction of these complications. The aims of this study were to explore the association between autoregulation and the occurrence of aVSP and DCI in SAH and identify cut-off values for measures of autoregulation (transfer function phase and gain) that can aid in prediction of aVSP or DCI. As a secondary aim, we also developed a simple and easy-to-use risk scoring approach that combines clinical, radiographic, and cerebral autoregulatory parameters.

Methods

All patients admitted to the neurointensive care unit at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital with a diagnosis of spontaneous SAH between March 15, 2010, and September 10, 2012, and with transcranial Doppler ultrasound measures within the first 4 days post-SAH were included in our study. Additional inclusion criteria were age >18 years, evidence of SAH on admission CT, and hemodynamic stability. Exclusion criteria were traumatic SAH and other central neurological disorders (tumors, previous stroke, hemorrhage or other vascular malformations). All patients were managed according to recommended guidelines,1,15 and the institutional review board approved the study.

aVSP was diagnosed from digital subtraction cerebral angiography performed between days 6 and 8 post-SAH and compared with baseline angiogram at presentation.16 DCI was diagnosed as a new cerebral infarct on the latest CT scan that was seen <6 weeks after SAH or before discharge or death and not attributable to any other causes16-18 (see the online-only Data Supplement for outcome definition and ascertainment).

Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation

Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (MultiDop x4; DWL-Transcranial Doppler System Inc, Sterling, VA) was used to measure resting blood flow velocity bilaterally in the middle cerebral arteries.19 Autoregulation was assessed from the phase and gain of the transfer function between beat-to-beat mean arterial pressure and mean flow velocity fluctuations across low (0.03–0.15 Hz) and high (0.15–0.5 Hz) frequency ranges (see the online-only Data Supplement).

Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed using data collected from days 2 to 4 post-SAH. There was no significant lateral or temporal difference in phase and gain. Therefore, phase and gain were averaged across sides and days 2 to 4 for analysis.

Continuous variables were expressed as mean±SD and categorical variables as proportions. After testing for normality (Shapiro–Wilk test), continuous variables were compared between patient groups (vasospasm versus no vasospasm; DCI versus no DCI) using unpaired Student t test (normal distribution) or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Categorical variables were compared using the Fisher exact test. We did not perform comparisons between aVSP and DCI because all but 3 of the DCI patients also had aVSP.

Classification and regression tree (CART) models were used to derive optimal cut-off points for significant predictors of aVSP or DCI, and stepwise logistic regression was used to derive parsimonious models for prediction. Point estimates of the β-coefficients of significant predictors in the final stepwise models were used as covariate-weighted scores to predict outcome as described previously.20-22 An individual’s overall risk score was calculated as the sum total of covariate-weighted scores for all independent variables (see the online-only Data Supplement for CART analysis, derivation and validation of the scoring tool, and sensitivity analysis). Ideally, an independent data set would be needed to validate each scoring tool externally. However, given our relatively small sample size, we relied on 2 separate procedures for validation: bootstrapping, which produces stable and unbiased estimates of predictive accuracy,23 and Jackknife (leave-one-out) resampling procedure. Average bias-corrected C-statistic obtained from 1000 bootstrap models was used to estimate the models’ potential for generalization to other populations, whereas Jackknife estimates provided a further measure of model bias and variance (see the online-only Data Supplement).

CART analysis was done using SPSS 21 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). All other analyses were performed in STATA 11 (StataCorp 2009, College Station, TX). A P value <0.05 was assumed to be statistically significant.

Results

Sixty-eight patients with SAH (31 nonaneurysmal) satisfied our criteria. Sixty-two percent (N=42) of patients developed aVSP, and 19% (N=13) developed DCI. All but 3 of the DCI patients also had aVSP.

Patients with aVSP were slightly younger and more likely to have aneurysmal SAH. They also had higher gain but similar phase on days 2 to 4 compared with those without aVSP (Table 1; Figure 1). Mean flow velocity was also significantly higher in patients who developed aVSP, but the values were significantly <120 cm/s used as cut-off point for clinical transcranial Doppler ultrasound diagnosis of vasospasm. Our findings did not change when we limited our analysis to patients with only middle cerebral artery aneurysms or only middle cerebral artery vasospasm (data not shown).

Table 1.

Baseline Demographic, Clinical, and Autoregulatory Characteristics of Patients With and Without Angiographic Vasospasm

Vasospasm Present
(N=42)
Vasospasm Absent
(N= 26)
P Value
Age, y 51.3 (11.3) 57.5 (14.5) 0.06
Men/women 16/26 12/14 0.61
Diabetes mellitus,
yes/no
5/37 2/24 0.70
Hypertension,
yes/no
20/22 9/17 0.32
Smoking, yes/no 16/26 4/19 0.12
Aneurysm, yes/no 31/11 6/20 <0.001
WFNS score* 2 (1–4) 1.5 (1–2) 0.86
Hunt and Hess* 2 (2–3) 2 (2–2) 0.61
Hemoglobin, mg/dL 12.9 (2.0) 12.0 (2.1) 0.11
Modified Fisher
score*
3 (3–4) 3 (2–3) 0.53
Admission glucose,
mg/dL
142.9 (35.0) 142.2 (36.0) 0.94
Admission
magnesium, mg/dL
1.9 (0.3) 1.9 (0.2) 0.51
Mean flow velocity,
cm/s
76.0 (21.6) 64.0 (21.2) 0.03
Mean arterial
pressure, mm Hg
82.2 (12.9) 78.6 (12.3) 0.26
Phase, degrees
(low frequency)
35.2 (20.2) 32.9 (31.2) 0.60
Gain (low
frequency)
1.06 (0.33) 0.89 (0.30) 0.04

Values represent mean (SD) for all continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables unless otherwise stated. WFNS indicates World Federation of Neurosurgeons.

*

Represent median (interquartile range).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Transfer function phase (A), gain (B), and mean ow velocity (C) in patients with and without angiographic vasospasm. Average transfer function phase, gain, and mean flow velocity across days 2 to 4 in the low frequency (LF; 0.03–0.15 Hz) and high frequency (HF; 0.15–0.5 Hz) ranges for patients with and without angiographic vasospasm. *P<0.05.

Patients who developed DCI were older, more likely to have aneurysmal SAH, had higher Hunt and Hess and World Federation of Neurosurgeons (WFNS) scores, and higher blood glucose on admission (Table 2). DCI patients also had lower phase on days 2 to 4 when compared with patients without DCI (Table 2; Figure 2). Our findings did not change when we adjusted our analysis to account for side and location of DCI (data not shown).

Table 2.

Baseline Demographic, Clinical, and Autoregulatory Characteristics of Patients With and Without Delayed Cerebral Ischemia (DCI)

DCI Present (N=13) DCI Absent (N= 55) P Value
Age, y 59.9 (12.3) 52.2 (12.6) 0.05
Men/women 4/9 24/31 0.40
Diabetes mellitus,
yes/no
2/11 5/50 0.61
Hypertension,
yes/no
7/6 22/33 0.36
Smoking, yes/no 5/8 16/39 0.52
Aneurysm, yes/no 11/2 26/29 0.02
Clipping/coiling if
aneurysmal, yes/no
9/2 17/8 0.69
WFNS score* 4 (2–4) 1 (1–2) 0.03
Hunt and Hess* 3 (2–4) 2 (2–3) 0.004
Modified Fisher
score*
3 (3–4) 3 (2–3) 0.23
Admission glucose,
mg/dL
161.3 (35.6) 138.2 (33.9) 0.03
Admission
magnesium, mg/dL
1.9 (0.3) 1.9 (0.2) 0.37
Mean flow velocity,
cm/s
71.0 (20.2) 71.5 (22.7) 0.94
Mean arterial
pressure, mm Hg
84.1 (14.9) 80.0 (12.1) 0.3
Phase, degrees
(low frequency)
17.5 (39.6) 38.3 (18.2) 0.03
Gain (low
frequency)
1.0 (0.3) 1.0 (0.3) 0.56

Values represent mean (SD) for all continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables unless otherwise stated. WFNS indicates World Federation of Neurosurgeons.

*

Represent median (interquartile range).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Transfer function phase (A), gain (B), and mean flow velocity (C) in patients with and without delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Average transfer function phase, gain, and mean flow velocity across days 2 to 4 in the low frequency (LF; 0.03–0.15 Hz) and high frequency (HF; 0.15–0.5 Hz) ranges for patients with and without DCI. *P<0.05.

CART Model Building and Model Comparison

Based on our CART analysis; gain >0.98, age ≤60 years, and mean flow velocity on days 2 to 4 >70 cm/s were identified as optimal cut-off points for predicting aVSP, whereas phase <12.5, mean arterial pressure on days 2 to 4 >90 mm Hg, and admission blood glucose >155 mg/dL were identified as optimal cut-off points for predicting DCI. These cut-off points were used for logistic regression models. To better assess the contribution of clinical variables and transfer function parameters to outcome, we used 3 separate logistic regression models: 1 with clinical variables, 1 with transfer function parameters, and 1 with both.

Table 3 summarizes the predictive values of aVSP and DCI models. The addition of gain >0.98 to models containing only clinical predictors (model 1 in Table 3) significantly improved the likelihood (P=0.007) of predicting aVSP, suggesting a better model fit with inclusion of transfer function gain as an independent predictor. Similarly, the addition of phase <12.5 to models containing only clinical predictors (model 4 in Table 3) significantly improved the likelihood of predicting DCI (P=0.03), suggesting a better model fit when phase is included as an independent predictor.

Table 3.

Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV), and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) for Various Clinical and Autoregulatory Predictors of Angiographic Vasospasm (aVSP) and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia (DCI)

Sensitivity,
%
Specificity,
%
PPV, % NPV, % AUROC
aVSP
 Gain >0.98
 alone
64.3 73.1 79.4 55.9 0.69
 Model 1* 73.8 84.6 88.6 66.7 0.86
 Model 2* 90.5 69.2 82.6 81.8 0.90
DCI
 Phase <12.5
 alone
46.2 98.2 85.7 88.5 0.72
 Model 3* 53.9 98.2 87.5 90.0 0.92
 Model 4* 61.5 96.4 80 91.3 0.94

Model 1: Stepwise forward selection model containing aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, smoking, and age <60 y as independent variables. Model 2: Model 1 plus transfer function gain >0.98. Model 3: Stepwise forward selection model containing World Federation of Neurosurgeons (WFNS) score IV to V, admission blood glucose >155 mg/dL, and mean arterial pressure >90 mm Hg on days 2 to 4. Model 4: Model 3 plus phase <12.5 degrees.

*

P<0.01 comparing model 1 to model 2, and P=0.03 comparing model 3 to model 4.

Scoring Tools for aVSP and DCI

We used a logistic regression model containing transfer function parameters and clinical variables to develop simple scoring tools for aVSP (Smoking, Age, Gain, Aneurysmal SAH [SAGA] score) and DCI (WFNS, Hyperglycemia, Arterial Pressure, Phase [WHAP] score). These scores were derived from the β-coefficients of significant predictors of outcome in stepwise multivariate models (models 2 and 4 in Table 3).

The SAGA score (Table 4) ranged from 0 to 11 with median 5 (interquartile range, 4–9) for all participants. A score ≥5 had 90% sensitivity and 69% specificity, whereas a score ≥7 had 62% sensitivity and 96% specificity for aVSP. The SAGA score had excellent discrimination (bootstrapped bias-corrected C-statistic, 0.90±0.03) and achieved good calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test; P=0.93). Each unit increase in the SAGA score was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of aVSP (Jackknife odds ratio, 2.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.59–4.32; Table I in the online-only Data Supplement).

Table 4.

Scoring Tools for Angiographic Vasospasm (aVSP; SAGA Score) and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia (DCI; WHAP Score)

Points
Category β-Coefficient* 95% CI for β P Value Yes No
SAGA score for aVSP
 Smoking 1.77 0.15–3.38 0.03 2 0
 Age ≤60 y 3.43 1.04–5.82 0.005 3 0
 Gain >0.98 1.92 0.43–3.41 0.01 2 0
 Aneurysmal
 SAH
4.02 1.65–6.39 0.001 4 0
WHAP score for DCI
 WFNS score
 IV to V
2.80 0.14–5.45 0.04 3 0
 Hyperglycemia
 (glucose > 155
 mg/dL)
1.31 −0.66 to 3.27 0.19 1 0
 Mean arterial
 pressure, >90
 mmHg
3.36 0.79–5.92 0.01 3 0
 Phase <12.5
 degrees
3.32 1.90–10.19 0.046 3 0

CI indicates confidence interval; SAGA, Smoking, Age, Gain, Aneurysmal SAH; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; WFNS, World Federation of Neurosurgeons; and WHAP, WFNS, Hyperglycemia, Arterial Pressure, Phase.

*

Obtained from stepwise logistic regression models adjusted for included predictors.

The WHAP score (Table 4) ranged from 0 to 7 (out of a maximum possible 10) with median 1 (interquartile range, 0–3). The WHAP score also had excellent discrimination (boot-strapped bias-corrected C-statistic, 0.94±0.03) and provided a good fit (Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test; P=0.53). The model had a sensitivity of 62%, specificity of 96%, positive predictive value of 80%, and a negative predictive value of 91% in classifying patients with DCI. A score ≥3 had 100% sensitivity and 65.5% specificity, whereas a score ≥6 had 62% sensitivity and 96% specificity. For each unit increase in the WHAP score, the odds of developing DCI increased 3-fold (Jackknife odds ratio, 2.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–4.78; Table I in the online-only Data Supplement).

Sensitivity Analysis

We compared the forward stepwise model used in our primary analysis for each outcome to that obtained using a backward stepwise selection approach. Both procedures yielded exactly the same models for aVSP. The backward regression approach in models with DCI as the dependent variable was in good agreement with the forward regression procedure on some predictors (WFNS IV to V; mean arterial pressure >90 mm Hg; and phase <12.5), but 2 additional variables (hypertension and aneurysmal SAH) were added to the model. Admission glucose >155 mg/dL was excluded from this model. The performance characteristics of the backward selection model for DCI were slightly higher than that obtained using the forward selection approach (Table II in the online-only Data Supplement), and a score derived using this approach had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96±0.02.

Discussion

We showed that cerebral autoregulation is impaired in the early days after SAH and that this impairment is predictive of aVSP and DCI. In patients with SAH, transfer function gain >0.98 alone was fairly specific for aVSP (73%), and transfer function phase <12.5 alone was highly specific for predicting DCI (98%). The addition of transfer function parameters that reflect the effectiveness of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (ie, phase and gain) to clinical and radiographic measures modestly but significantly improved the specificity and sensitivity of identifying patients at high risk for aVSP and DCI. Thus, although our study was a pilot trial with limited number of subjects, our results highlight the potential importance of cerebrovascular control in the development of aVSP and DCI, as well as the potential advantage of incorporating measures of cerebral autoregulation into predictive models of vasospasm or DCI.

Previous studies that attempted to predict the clinical outcomes of vasospasm or DCI have been limited by how these outcomes were defined and ascertained.10,12 The use of cerebral blood flow velocity alone to diagnose vasospasm is limited,24 and a purely clinical diagnosis of DCI may be con-founded by various other medical comorbidities unrelated to ischemic injury. In our study, we relied on imaging criteria alone for DCI, current recommended standard for DCI reporting,16-18 and aVSP was ascertained from conventional 4-vessel angiogram, the accepted gold standard for this diagnosis. The use of continuous variables as predictors has also been a limiting factor,25 making it difficult to apply such models at the bedside. Our modeling approach with statistically derived cut-off points for risk prediction effectively translates these measures into bedside clinical tools. Although we recognize that dichotomizing continuous variables may result in some loss of information, our focus and emphasis in this study was on clinical utility. Consistent with this emphasis, it is also important to note that our measures rely on the use of transcranial Doppler ultrasound, which is a noninvasive tool available at bedside in the majority of neurointensive care units and is already routinely used for clinical monitoring of vasospasm.

The SAGA and WHAP scores developed and proposed in this study incorporate established clinical and autoregulatory measures to enhance our ability to accurately identify SAH patients at high risk for secondary complications in the first few days after their admission. Accurate prediction of aVSP and DCI shortly after initial SAH (within the first 4 days) can facilitate individualized medical or endovascular measures for patients with SAH. Moreover, given their high specificity and sensitivity, the scores developed in this study can also help in the selection or proper risk stratification of patients for future randomized clinical trials. Thus, the SAGA score for vasospasm and WHAP score for DCI, which combine simple clinical and physiological parameters, offer great promise for both clinical and research applications.

The positive association of transfer function gain with aVSP and the negative association of transfer function phase with DCI support the hypothesis that autoregulation may be impaired in the first few days after SAH, and that the degree of this impairment may be related to the development of secondary complications. With intact autoregulation, cerebral vessels effectively buffer against slow arterial fluctuations. Thus, there is delay (high phase) and dampening (low gain) in the transmission of pressure fluctuations to cerebral flow. We showed that in early SAH, autoregulation is impaired as manifested by a low phase (DCI) and a high gain (VSP) between pressure and flow fluctuations. Previous studies support that deterioration in cerebral autoregulation precedes vasospasm without a marked change in blood flow velocity,12 and patients with intact cerebral autoregulation after initial hemorrhage seem to have lesser risk of vasospasm and DCI regardless of the absolute cerebral blood flow velocity.7,13,26 The differential association of gain and phase with aVSP and DCI, respectively, may suggest that potentially different mechanisms of dysregulation may contribute to subsequent development of vasospasm and DCI. However, although increased gain and reduced phase both indicate an impairment of cerebral auto-regulation, they are insufficient to tease apart physiological mechanisms of autoregulation.27,28

Lastly, we acknowledge that risk scores do best in the population from which they are derived. Therefore, these scores will need to be validated in a larger and independent cohort before they can be fully adopted in clinical settings. Nevertheless, to improve the validity of our findings, we have used in our models only carefully selected predictive factors derived mainly from systematic reviews of DCI risk factors5,6 and established risk factors for vasospasm.4,29,30 Moreover, the likelihood of including superfluous independent predictors was minimized via sensitivity analyses, and generalizability of the models was rigorously tested via well-established internal validation procedures.

In conclusion, our study provides further evidence that cerebral autoregulation is impaired in the early days after SAH, long before there is any other evidence of clinical or radiographic deterioration. The addition of autoregulatory parameters to clinical and radiographic variables can improve our ability to identify patients at a high risk for aVSP and DCI after SAH. Therefore, the SAGA and WHAP scores, which combine simple clinical variables with those related to cerebrovascular regulation, hold promise as clinical tools in neurointensive care units.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental

Acknowledgments

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by grant K23-AG030967 (to F.A.S.) from the National Institute of Aging.

Footnotes

The online-only Data Supplement is available with this article at http://stroke.ahajournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002630/-/DC1.

Disclosures

None.

References

  • 1.Connolly ES, Jr, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, Derdeyn CP, Dion J, Higashida RT, et al. American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Clinical Cardiology Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/american Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43:1711–1737. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Friedman JA, Goerss SJ, Meyer FB, Piepgras DG, Pichelmann MA, McIver JI, et al. Volumetric quantification of Fisher Grade 3 aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a novel method to predict symptomatic vasospasm on admission computerized tomography scans. J Neurosurg. 2002;97:401–407. doi: 10.3171/jns.2002.97.2.0401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Charpentier C, Audibert G, Guillemin F, Civit T, Ducrocq X, Bracard S, et al. Multivariate analysis of predictors of cerebral vasospasm occurrence after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 1999;30:1402–1408. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.7.1402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dupont SA, Wijdicks EF, Manno EM, Lanzino G, Rabinstein AA. Prediction of angiographic vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: value of the Hijdra sum scoring system. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11:172–176. doi: 10.1007/s12028-009-9247-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.de Rooij NK, Rinkel GJ, Dankbaar JW, Frijns CJ. Delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review of clinical, laboratory, and radiological predictors. Stroke. 2013;44:43–54. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.674291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kruyt ND, Biessels GJ, de Haan RJ, Vermeulen M, Rinkel GJ, Coert B, et al. Hyperglycemia and clinical outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2009;40:e424–e430. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.529974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lam JM, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Pickard JD, Kirkpatrick PJ. Predicting delayed ischemic deficits after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage using a transient hyperemic response test of cerebral auto-regulation. Neurosurgery. 2000;47:819–825. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200010000-00004. discussions 825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jaeger M, Soehle M, Schuhmann MU, Meixensberger J. Clinical significance of impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation after severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2012;43:2097–2101. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.659888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jaeger M, Schuhmann MU, Soehle M, Nagel C, Meixensberger J. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular autoregulation after subarachnoid hemorrhage by brain tissue oxygen pressure reactivity and its relation to delayed cerebral infarction. Stroke. 2007;38:981–986. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000257964.65743.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Budohoski KP, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kasprowicz M, Helmy A, Bulters D, et al. Impairment of cerebral autoregulation predicts delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective observational study. Stroke. 2012;43:3230–3237. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.669788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Pickard JD, Matheson M, Patterson J, Wyper D. Prediction of late ischemic complications after cerebral aneurysm surgery by the intraoperative measurement of cerebral blood flow. J Neurosurg. 1980;53:305–308. doi: 10.3171/jns.1980.53.3.0305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lang EW, Diehl RR, Mehdorn HM. Cerebral autoregulation testing after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: the phase relationship between arterial blood pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:158–163. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200101000-00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rätsep T, Asser T. Cerebral hemodynamic impairment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage as evaluated using transcranial doppler ultra-sonography: relationship to delayed cerebral ischemia and clinical outcome. J Neurosurg. 2001;95:393–401. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.95.3.0393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Budohoski KP, Czosnyka M, Kirkpatrick PJ, Smielewski P, Steiner LA, Pickard JD. Clinical relevance of cerebral autoregulation following sub-arachnoid haemorrhage. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9:152–163. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bederson JB, Connolly ES, Jr, Batjer HH, Dacey RG, Dion JE, Diringer MN, et al. American Heart Association Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke. 2009;40:994–1025. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.191395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Etminan N, Beseoglu K, Heiroth HJ, Turowski B, Steiger HJ, Hänggi D. Early perfusion computerized tomography imaging as a radiographic surrogate for delayed cerebral ischemia and functional outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2013;44:1260–1266. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.675975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vergouwen MD, Vermeulen M, van Gijn J, Rinkel GJ, Wijdicks EF, Muizelaar JP, et al. inition of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage as an outcome event in clinical trials and observational studies: proposal of a multidisciplinary research group. Stroke. 2010;41:2391–2395. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.589275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vergouwen MD. Participants in the International Multi-Disciplinary Consensus Conference on the Critical Care Management of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Vasospasm versus delayed cerebral ischemia as an outcome event in clinical trials and observational studies. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15:308–311. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9586-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sorond FA, Khavari R, Serrador JM, Lipsitz LA. Regional cerebral auto-regulation during orthostatic stress: age-related differences. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60:1484–1487. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.11.1484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Onder G, Petrovic M, Tangiisuran B, Meinardi MC, Markito-Notenboom WP, Somers A, et al. Development and validation of a score to assess risk of adverse drug reactions among in-hospital patients 65 years or older: the GerontoNet ADR risk score. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:1142–1148. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ntaios G, Faouzi M, Ferrari J, Lang W, Vemmos K, Michel P. An integer-based score to predict functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke: the ASTRAL score. Neurology. 2012;78:1916–1922. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318259e221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Smith EE, Shobha N, Dai D, Olson DM, Reeves MJ, Saver JL, et al. Risk score for in-hospital ischemic stroke mortality derived and validated within the Get with the Guidelines-Stroke Program. Circulation. 2010;122:1496–1504. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.932822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Harrell FE, Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–387. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lysakowski C, Walder B, Costanza MC, Tramèr MR. Transcranial Doppler versus angiography in patients with vasospasm due to a ruptured cerebral aneurysm: a systematic review. Stroke. 2001;32:2292–2298. doi: 10.1161/hs1001.097108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Carrera E, Schmidt JM, Oddo M, Ostapkovich N, Claassen J, Rincon F, et al. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound in the acute phase of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27:579–584. doi: 10.1159/000214222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Soehle M, Czosnyka M, Pickard JD, Kirkpatrick PJ. Continuous assessment of cerebral autoregulation in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Anesth Analg. 2004;98:1133–1139. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000111101.41190.99. table of contents. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tan CO, Taylor JA. Exp Physiol. Nov 1, 2013. Integrative physiological and computational approaches to understand autonomic control of cerebral autoregulation. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2013.072355.: http://ep.physoc.org/content/early/2013/11/01/expphysiol.2013.072355. Accessed November 4, 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tan CO, Hamner JW, Taylor JA. The role of myogenic mechanisms in human cerebrovascular regulation. J Physiol. 2013;591:5095–5105. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.259747. pt 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Torbey MT, Hauser TK, Bhardwaj A, Williams MA, Ulatowski JA, Mirski MA, et al. Effect of age on cerebral blood flow velocity and incidence of vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001;32:2005–2011. doi: 10.1161/hs0901.094622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jabbarli R, Glasker S, Weber J, Taschner C, Olschewski M, Van Velthoven V. Predictors of severity of cerebral vasospasm caused by aneurysmal sub-arachnoid hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22:1332–1339. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental

RESOURCES