Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 Apr 30;3(2):e00379-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00379-15

Whole-Genome Sequencing of 10 Pseudomonas syringae Strains Representing Different Host Range Spectra

Claudia Bartoli a,b,c,d, Sébastien Carrere c,d, Jay Ram Lamichhane a,b,e, Leonardo Varvaro a, Cindy E Morris b,
PMCID: PMC4417698  PMID: 25931602

Abstract

Pseudomonas syringae is a ubiquitous bacterium that readily persists in environmental habitats as a saprophyte and also is responsible for numerous diseases of crops. Here, we report the whole-genome sequences of 10 strains isolated from both woody and herbaceous plants that will contribute to the elucidation of the determinants of their host ranges.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The Pseudomonas syringae complex is composed of 13 phylogenetic groups (1) collectively able to cause disease on more than one hundred plant species (2, 3). P. syringae strains have also been isolated from substrates other than plants in various habitats linked to the water cycle. Many of these environmental strains, when tested in the laboratory, are also pathogenic for several plant species (4, 5). Here, we sequenced, assembled, and annotated the whole genomes of 10 strains of P. syringae isolated from diverse plants and representing 3 phylogenetic groups. These strains were chosen to represent different host range spectra based on the results of research to be reported elsewhere. From phylogroup 1, the strains included CFBP 1657 (pv. maculicola) isolated from Brassica oleracea, CFBP 1702 (pv. viburni) isolated from Viburnum sp., and PaVt10 (5) (pv. avellanae) isolated from Corylus avellana. From phylogroup 2, the strains were 41a from Prunus armeniaca and CFBP 1754 (pv. papulans) from Malus sylvestris. From phylogroup 3, we sequenced the genomes of strains CFBP 3205 (pv. amygdali) from Prunus dulcis, CFBP 3225 (pv. meliae) from Melia azedarach, CFBP 3226 (pv. dendropanacis) from Dendropanax trifidus, CFBP 4219 (pv. daphniphylli) from Daphniphyllum sp., and PseNe107 (5) (pv. savastanoi) from Olea europaea. With the exception of strain 41a, all other strains were from reference collections and were described previously. For all strains, DNA was extracted by using the Qiagen Genomic-tip 100/G kit after growing strains overnight at 26°C in a liquid nutrient broth. Illumina libraries were constructed with the NEXTflex PCR-free DNA sequencing kit and NEXTflex PCR-free barcodes, and genomes were sequenced by using MiSeq M00185 (250-bp paired-end reads). The insert sizes for each genome are reported in Table 1. Overall, the average insert size was 389 bp. De novo assembly was performed by using a pipeline that consists of a combination of Velvet (6), SOAPdenovo, and SOAPGapCloser (7). The structural annotation of the contigs was achieved as previously described (8). The features for each genome are reported in Table 1. Analysis of the 10 P. syringae genomes showed that all strains present a complete type III secretion system.

TABLE 1.

Genome characteristics

Strain name Phylogroup Accession no. Genome size (bp) Insert size (bp) No. of contigs N50 (bp) No. of protein-coding genes G+C content (%)
CFBP 1657 1 JYHH00000000 891,415,000 374 138 122,411 5,209 58.43
CFBP 1702 1 JYHK00000000 944,775,000 397 265 98,077 5,595 58.60
PaVt10 1 JYHC00000000 899,519,500 392 455 30,706 4,807 58.82
41a 2 JYHJ00000000 930,312,000 372 24 665,729 5,126 59.11
CFBP 1754 2 JYHI00000000 735,876,000 394 182 132,813 2,378 58.97
CFBP 3205 3 JYHB00000000 697,222,500 404 343 35,334 4,934 58.29
CFBP 3225 3 JYHE00000000 733,793,000 390 360 34,681 4,344 58.40
CFBP 3226 3 JYHG00000000 545,040,500 370 247 73,921 4,988 58.11
CFBP 4219 3 JYHD00000000 614,308,500 403 377 47,492 5,100 58.12
PseNe107 3 JYHF00000000 853,186,500 396 247 109,046 5,303 58.02

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the GetPlage Platform (INRA-Toulouse) for assistance in genome sequencing. Genome assembly and annotation were performed by using the informatics facilities of INRA-Toulouse LIPM Research Unit.

Support for this work came from in-house funding from UR0407 of INRA and from DAFNE of Tuscia University and from contract no. 21000546 to UR0407 from the French Ministry of Agriculture for the RESIBAC project.

Footnotes

Citation Bartoli C, Carrere S, Lamichhane JR, Varvaro L, Morris CE. 2015. Whole-genome sequencing of 10 Pseudomonas syringae strains representing different host range spectra. Genome Announc 3(2):e00379-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00379-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Berge O, Monteil CL, Bartoli C, Chandeysson C, Guilbaud C, Sands DC, Morris CE. 2014. A user’s guide to a data base of the diversity of Pseudomonas syringae and its application to classifying strains in this phylogenetic complex. PLoS One 9:e105547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lamichhane JR, Varvaro L, Parisi L, Audergon J-M, Morris CE. 2014. Disease and frost damage of woody plants caused by Pseudomonas syringae: seeing the forest for the trees. Adv Agron 126:235–295. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800132-5.00004-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lamichhane JR, Messéan A, Morris CE. 2015. Insights into epidemiology and control of diseases of annual plants caused by the Pseudomonas syringae species complex. J Gen Plant Pathol, in press. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Morris CE, Kinkel LL, Xiao K, Prior P, Sands DC. 2007. Surprising niche for the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Infect Genet Evol 7:84–92. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2006.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bartoli C, Lamichhane JR, Berge O, Guilbaud C, Varvaro L, Balestra GM, Vinatzer BA, Morris CE. 2015. A framework to gauge the epidemic potential of plant pathogens in environmental reservoirs: the example of kiwifruit canker. Mol Plant Pathol 16:137–149. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W, Yuan J, He G, Chen Y, Pan Q, Liu Y, Tang J, Wu G, Zhang H, Shi Y, Liu Y, Yu C, Wang B, Lu Y, Han C, Cheung DW, Yiu S-M, Peng S, Xiaoqian Z, Liu G, Liao X, Li Y, Yang H, Wang J, Lam T-W, Wang J. 2012. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 1:18. doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-1-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sallet E, Gouzy J, Schiex T. 2014. EuGene-PP: a next-generation automated annotation pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 30:2659–2661. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES