Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bone. 2015 Apr 18;77:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.04.018

Racial Differences in Bone Loss and Relation to Menopause Among HIV-infected and Uninfected Women

Anjali Sharma 1, Peter L Flom 2, Clifford J Rosen 3, Ellie E Schoenbaum 1,4,5
PMCID: PMC4418198  NIHMSID: NIHMS682538  PMID: 25896953

Abstract

Objective

To characterize changes in bone mineral density (BMD) according to race among HIV-infected and uninfected women, and to evaluate the relationship between race and menopause-related bone loss.

Methods

Dual x-ray absorptiometry measured BMD on study entry and a minimum of 18 months later in 246 HIV-infected and 219 HIV-uninfected women in the Menopause Study. Linear regression analyses determined percent annual BMD change at total hip (TH), femoral neck (FN), and lumbar spine (LS) after adjusting for potential confounders. Race-stratified and HIV-infected subgroup analyses were performed.

Results

At baseline, mean age was 45 years, 19% of women were postmenopausal. HIV-infected women were more likely to be black (58% vs. 38%), and had lower BMI and less cigarette exposure when compared to HIV-uninfected women. Women who were perimenopausal at baseline and postmenopausal at follow-up had the greatest TH bone loss (−1.68%/yr, p<.0001) followed by those postmenopausal throughout (−1.02%/yr, p=.007). We found a significant interaction between HIV status and race in multivariate analyses of BMD change at the FN and TH. In race-stratified analyses, HIV infection was associated with TH BMD loss in non-black women. Black women experienced greater menopause-associated decline in TH BMD compared with non-black women.

Conclusions

The association of HIV and BMD differs strikingly by race, as do the effects of the menopausal transition on bone. Determining the extent to which the effect of HIV on fracture risk varies by race will be crucial to identify HIV-infected women at greatest risk for osteoporotic fracture, particularly as they enter menopause.

Keywords: bone mineral density, menopause, HIV, race, women, osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

Long-term consequences of HIV infection and its treatment, particularly disturbances of bone metabolism, are emerging concerns given the growing numbers of older adults living with HIV. Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) is common in persons living with HIV, who are estimated to be at over 3 times the risk for osteoporosis and almost 7 times the risk of osteopenia as their uninfected counterparts [1]. Emerging fracture data are worrisome, showing 30–70% higher fracture rates among HIV-infected persons compared with uninfected persons [24.] Although race and ethnicity are known to be important factors influencing osteoporosis and fracture risk in population based studies, few studies conducted in HIV-infected persons have specifically examined the contribution of race to osteoporosis. Additionally, studies focusing on BMD in HIV-infected women have generally lacked a seronegative comparison group with similar demographic characteristics and risk factors for osteoporosis, or have included either only premenopausal women [59] or only postmenopausal women [10]. In the general population, the most important risk factor for bone loss in middle-aged women is menopause. Yet there is wide variation in the rate of bone loss during the menopausal transition, with some women experiencing rapid bone loss and others having relatively stable BMD [1113]. Patterns of bone loss during the menopausal transition may vary by race/ethnicity, which may in turn, contribute to differences in fracture rates. We undertook this study to evaluate racial and ethnic differences in risk for bone loss among middle-aged HIV-infected and uninfected women, and to investigate the relationship between race and bone loss associated with the menopausal transition among HIV-infected and at-risk women.

METHODS

Study Participants

Between August 2001 and July 2003, women over age 35 were recruited from methadone programs, primary care clinics, and community newsletters in the Bronx, New York, and enrolled in the Menopause Study cohort (MS) as previously described [14]. Enrollment was stratified so that 50% of the cohort was HIV-infected and 50% was uninfected, and within each strata 50% reported illicit drug use within 5 years, and 50% reported other high-risk behavior. Semiannual research visits included standardized interviews, phlebotomy, and height and weight measurements for body mass index (BMI) calculation. The current analysis includes women who completed BMD measurement by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) on study entry and at a minimum of 18 months later. The MS was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and all participants provided written, informed consent.

Interview data

Standardized interviews were administered either in English or Spanish, using translated study instruments by trained research staff, and collected demographics, personal and family medical history, antiretroviral and other medication use, sexual history, reproductive and menstrual history, and exercise and dietary habits. Menopause status was based on self-report of bleeding pattern over the past year using menstrual diaries and defined according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria [15]. Menopause was defined as at least 12 consecutive months of amenorrhea, and age at onset of menopause was determined as of the date of the last menstrual period, after WHO criteria were met. Women who reported amenorrhea for 12 months at their first visit were included. Perimenopause was defined as absence of menses in at least 3 cycles but for <12 months in the past year, and perimenopausal classification was retained until evidence of completion of menopause. For women who experienced onset of menopause at or just before the baseline interview, there was an average of 1 year of follow-up interviews for confirmation of menopause. Drug-use behaviors were measured at each visit, including drug type, route of administration, frequency, and methadone dose for subjects prescribed methadone replacement. The CAGE questionnaire was administered to screen for alcohol dependence [16], and amount and frequency of current alcohol use was also collected. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale [17], and depressive symptoms, drug use behaviors, and sexual history were assessed using audio computer-assisted self-interviewing technique, which enhances collection of stigmatic or sensitive information [18].

Laboratory Methods

Laboratory measures completed at each visit included HIV and Hepatitis C serologic testing, and for HIV-infected participants, CD4+ count and HIV viral load. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), estradiol (E2), and prolactin were collected annually, and during days 2–6 of the cycle for menstruating women. For women who had completed DEXA at two time points, using stored sera corresponding with time of the first DEXA, levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) were assayed using ISYS automated immunoassay system (Immunodiagnostic Systems Inc.[IDS], Scottsdale, AZ); C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTx) was analyzed using ELISA (Serum CrossLaps; IDS, Scottsdale, AZ); bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) was analyzed using the Ostase BAP EIA (IDS, Scottsdale, AZ); osteocalcin (OC) was analyzed using the N-Mid Osteocalcin ELISA (IDS, Scottsdale, AZ).

Bone Mineral Density Assessment

BMD (g/cm2) of the total hip (TH), femoral neck (FN), and lumbar spine (LS, L2–L4) were measured at two time points using a Prodigy densitometer with GE Lunar software, version 6.8, with only one densitometer used for the entire study.

Statistical Analysis

Linear regression models examined the relationship between annual percent change in BMD at total hip (TH), femoral neck (FN), and lumbar spine (LS) and race in relation to menopause after adjusting for potential confounders (see below). Because race was strongly associated with BMD and there were unequal proportions of black women in the HIV-positive and HIV-negative groups, we constructed models stratified by race (black vs. non-black), and tested for an interaction between HIV status and race. Unique models were constructed for TH, FN, and LS for both race strata that included the same variables as in the combined models. Levels of bone turnover markers (CTx, OC, and BAP) were log10 transformed for analyses. Subgroup analyses assessed associations between HIV-specific factors and % change in BMD per year.

To avoid the problems associated with stepwise variable selection we first created two sets of independent variables for each of two groups: all women and HIV-infected women. One set was forced covariates included in all regressions for substantive reasons and another of covariates and independent variables that we were interested in assessing [1921]. Forced covariates were: age, race, BMI, menopause status (at baseline and follow-up), smoking pack years, history of methadone use, HIV serostatus, Hepatitis C virus serostatus, FSH level, 25OHD level, and baseline BMD. Forced covariates for analyses restricted to HIV-infected women included history of AIDS diagnosis, duration of HIV diagnosis, CD4+ cell count, use of tenofovir, and use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in addition to those covariates forced into analyses of the full cohort. Antiretroviral use was categorized as never use, initiation during the study period in ART naïve persons, use at first DEXA with subsequent discontinuation during the study period, reinitiation of antiretrovirals during the study period in non-naïve persons, and continuous use throughout the study. Tenofovir use was categorized similarly however no persons re-initiated tenofovir during the study. After performing multiple regressions with the forced covariates, we then performed multiple regressions with forced variables and other covariates of interest.

RESULTS

Study Participants

Participant characteristics are shown in Table 1. Of the 465 participants, 246 (53%) were HIV-infected. At baseline, 19% of women were postmenopausal, and an additional 10% of HIV-infected women and 6% of HIV-uninfected women became postmenopausal over the study period. HIV-infected women were younger and more likely to be black than were HIV-uninfected women, had lower BMI, less lifetime cigarette exposure, and were less likely to report a history of opioid exposure. Among HIV-infected women, 11% were antiretroviral therapy naïve, 85% reported past NRTI use, and 63% reported PI use. Tenofovir was initiated between the 2 DEXA measurements in 26% of HIV-infected women, 3% were on tenofovir at the time of the first DEXA and continued tenofovir throughout the study period, and 69% reported never using tenofovir. Cross-sectional and longitudinal BMD analyses have previously been published by our group, and the current analyses include new data on bone turnover markers and new regression analyses of the effects of race, menopause, and initiation and discontinuation of antiretrovirals including tenofovir on bone mineral density [22, 23].

Table 1.

Menopause Study participant characteristics

Characteristica,b HIV−
n=219
HIV+
n=246
P valuec
Age at 1st exam (yrs), mean ± SD 48.0 ± 5.1 46.9 ± 4.9 .02

Race (%) <.0001
Black 38.4 57.7
Not Black (White, Hispanic, Other) 61.6 42.3

Menopause status: visit 1 & 2 (%) .57
Premenopausal (1) Premenopausal (2) 32.1 29.3
Premenopausal (1) Perimenopausal (2) 16.0 14.2
Perimenopausal (1) Perimenopausal (2) 26.4 25.9
Perimenopausal (1) Postmenopausal (2) 6.1 10.3
Postmenopausal (1) Postmenopausal (2) 19.3 20.3

BMI at visit 1 (kg/m2), mean ± SD 32.0 ± 7.1 28.2 ± 6.4 <.0001

Past estrogen therapy (%) 8.7 12.6 .17

Ever corticosteroid use (%) 10.5 9.0 .58

Smoking history (%) .10
Nonsmoker 8.7 9.4
Former smoker 21.0 29.3
Current smoker 70.3 61.4

Pack years at visit 1, mean ± SD 18.5 ± 15.9 14.4 ± 14.0 .003

Alcohol drinks per day, mean ± SD 0.39 ± 1.14 0.41 ± 0.09 .86

Opioid use ever (%) 54.3 31.3 <.0001

Methadone use ever (%) 46.1 21.6 <.0001

Hepatitis C Virus seropositivity (%) 47.7 51.5 .42

FSH level (IU/L), mean ± SD 46.1 ± 5.1 45.1 ± 4.2 .03

25OH vitamin D level (ng/mL), mean ± SD 18.8 ± 8.9 19.3 ± 9.6 .60

Log10 BAP (mcg/L), mean ± SD 1.26 ± 0.17 1.29 ± 0.20 .14

Log10 Osteocalcin (ng/mL), mean ± SD 0.94 ± 0.33 1.03 ± 0.36 .007

Log10 CTx (ng/mL), mean ± SD −0.78 ± 0.23 −0.71 ± 0.30 .004

Total hip BMD (g/cm2) (mean ± SD) 1.08 ± 0.14 1.04 ± 0.15 .002

Femoral neck BMD (g/cm2) (mean ± SD) 1.04 ± 0.14 1.01 ± 0.14 .02

Lumbar spine BMD (g/cm2) (mean ± SD) 1.23 ± 0.17 1.21 ± 0.17 .14

History of AIDS diagnosis NAd 31.3 NAd

CD4 count (cells/ml), median (IQR) NAd 486 (321, 697) NAd

HIV RNA viral load (copies/ml), median (IQR) NAd 141.3 (75.9, 4,265.8) NAd

HIV RNA viral load (log10 copies/ml ), median (IQR) NAd 2.2 (1.9, 3.6) NAd

Antiretroviral therapy use (%)

Never use NAd 11.4 NAd

Initiation (naive) NAd 3.3 NAd

Discontinuation NAd 5.3 NAd

Re-initiation NAd 10.2 NAd

Continuous use NAd 69.5 NAd

Tenofovir use (%)

Never use NAd 68.7 NAd

Initiation NAd 25.6 NAd

Discontinuation NAd 0.8 NAd

Continuous use NAd 3.3 NAd

Time from HIV diagnosis (yrs, %)
Unknown NAd 1.6 NAd
< 5 NAd 19.9 NAd
5–9 NAd 36.6 NAd
≥10 NAd 41.9 NAd
a

Abbreviations: HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; BMI: body mass index; BMD: bone mineral density; FSH: follicle-stimulating hormone; BAP: bone-specific alkaline phosphatase; OC: osteocalcin; CTx: C-telopeptide

b

Values are expressed as mean ± SD for continuous variables and % for categorical variables

c

Compares HIV− to HIV+ with independent samples t-test for continuous variables and with chi-square for categorical variables

d

NA not applicable since only applies to HIV+

Menopause participant characteristics have been previously published (Sharma A, et al. Maturitas. 2011 Nov; 70(3): 295–301.)

HIV-infected women had lower baseline BMD at the TH and FN when compared with HIV-uninfected women, in addition to higher levels of both bone formation and resorption markers. Median values of OC were higher in HIV-infected women compared with uninfected women [10.8 ng/mL for HIV+, (IQR 7.2–17.9) vs.9.4 ng/mL for HIV− (IQR 5.9–13.5); p=.001]. Median CTx level was also higher in HIV-infected women compared with uninfected women [0.19 ng/mL for HIV+, (IQR 0.13–0.31) vs. 0.17 ng/mL for HIV− (IQR 0.12–0.24); p =.02]. Mean time between the two DEXA scans was slightly lower for HIV-infected women (1.80 years + 0.28 for HIV+ vs.1.88 yrs + 0.34 for HIV−; p= 0.005). When comparing subjects who completed two DEXA scan to those who completed one, we found no significant differences between groups in terms of race, menopause status, opioid or methadone use, hepatitis C serostatus, history of corticosteroid use, FSH level, age, cigarette pack years, number of alcohol-containing drinks, or BMI. Baseline BMD at LS (1.20 g/cm2 + 0.17 for one DXA, vs. 1.22 g/cm2 + 0.17, p=0.23), and TH (1.03 g/cm2 + 0.17 for one DEXA, vs. 1.06 g/cm2 + 0.15, p=0.06) were similar between groups, however FN BMD was higher at baseline in those who completed both initial and follow-up DEXA when compared to those who had only one DEXA measure (0.99 g/cm2 + 0.15 for one DEXA vs. 1.02 g/cm2 + 0.14 for two DEXA, p=0.02).

Analysis of Annual % Change in Bone Mineral Density in the Full MS Cohort

In unadjusted analyses, mean annual % change in BMD was similar between HIV-infected and uninfected women at the TH (−0.34%/y HIV+ vs. −0.38%/y HIV−, p=0.88), FN (−0.47%/y HIV+ vs. −0.50%/y HIV−, p=0.88), and LS (−0.54%/y HIV+ vs. −0.17%/y HIV−, p=0.13). In multivariable analyses, we found a significant interaction between HIV status and race in analyses of change in BMD at FN and TH, showing that the combined effects of HIV and race on BMD vary, and we thus conducted race-stratified analyses. In analyses of the full MS cohort, when compared with women who remained premenopausal throughout the study period, women who were perimenopausal at baseline and postmenopausal at follow-up had the greatest amount of TH bone loss (−1.68%/yr, p<.0001), followed by those postmenopausal throughout (−1.02%/yr, p=.0066), and those pre-menopausal at baseline and perimenopausal at follow-up (−0.64%/yr, p=.024) or perimenopausal throughout (−0.58%/yr, p=.019) (Table 2.) BMI was positively associated with TH, FN, and LS BMD, while hepatitis C seropositivity was associated with FN BMD decline (−0.56%/yr, p=.019), and serum FSH level was associated with LS BMD decline (−0.020%/yr BMD change per IU/L of baseline FSH level, p=.014.

Table 2.

Factors Associated with % Annual Change in BMD (g/cm2) in the Menopause Study Cohort

Total Hip (p; 95% CI) Femoral Neck (p; 95% CI) Lumbar Spine (p; 95% CI)
Black race*HIV 1.00 (0.0070; 0.27, 1.72) 1.30 (0.0032; 0.44, 2.16) 0.43 (0.40; −0.58, 1.45)
Black race −0.42 (0.13; −0.96, 0.12) 0.72 (0.032;1.37,0.064) 0.028 (0.94; −0.74, 0.80)
HIV+ serostatus −0.46 (0.080; −0.98, 0.054) −0.49 (0.12; −1.10, 0.13) −0.59 (0.11; −1.31, 0.13)
BMI (kg/m2) 0.044 (0.0026; 0.015, 0.073) 0.035 (0.040; 0.0016, 0.069) 0.096 (<0.0001; 0.058, 0.13)
Menopause status (time 1 & 2)
Pre-menopausal (1)
Pre-menopausal (2)
Reference Reference Reference
Pre-menopausal (1)
Peri-menopausal (2)
0.64 (0.024;1.19,0.086) 0.68 (0.043;1.34,0.023) −0.68 (0.085; −1.46, 0.095)
Peri-menopausal (1)
Peri-menopausal (2)
0.58 (0.019;1.055,0.097) −0.31 (0.29; −0.88, 0.27) −0.22 (0.51; −0.90, 0.45)
Peri-menopausal (1)
Post-menopausal (2)
1.68 (<0.0001;2.43,0.92) −0.79 (0.080; −1.68, 0.096) −0.53 (0.32; −1.57, 0.52)
Post-menopausal (1)
Post-menopausal (2)
1.020 (0.0066;1.75,0.29) −0.49 (0.27; −1.36, 0.38) −0.53 (0.31; −1.56, 0.49)
HCV+ serostatus −0.19 (0.33; −0.58, 0.20) 0.56 (0.019;1.026,0.095) −0.21 (0.45; −0.76, 0.34)
FSH level (per IU/L) −0.0079 (0.20; −0.020, 0.0041) −0.00029 (0.97; −0.014, 0.013) 0.020 (0.014;0.036,0.0042)

Abbreviations: BMD: bone mineral density; CI: confidence interval; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; BMI: body mass index. Models are adjusted for baseline BMD, age, race, BMI, menopause status at time 1 and 2 (reference value is premenopausal at time 1 and 2), smoking pack years, methadone use, HIV status, HCV status, FSH level, 25OH vitamin D

Race-stratified Analyses of Annual % Change in BMD

The association of HIV and change in BMD differed strikingly by race: although HIV infection was not associated with bone loss among black women, it was associated with −0.55% greater TH bone loss per year among non-black women, relative to non-black women who were HIV-uninfected (Table 3). Moreover, we found racial differences in bone loss associated with menopause. Among black women, we observed menopause-related bone loss at the TH in particular, such that when compared with black women who remained premenopausal throughout the study period, those who were perimenopausal at baseline and postmenopausal at follow-up had the greatest amount of TH bone loss (−1.89%/yr, p=0.0017), followed by those postmenopausal throughout (−1.29%/yr, p=0.0033), and those pre-menopausal at baseline and perimenopausal at follow-up (−1.022%/yr, p=0.014) or perimenopausal throughout (−0.76%/yr, p=0.050). Among non-black women, compared with those who remained premenopausal throughout, menopause-related bone loss was significant for women transitioning from perimenopause to postmenopause, and at the TH only (−1.50%/yr, p=0.0047).

Table 3.

Racial Differences in Factors Associated with % Annual Change in BMD (g/cm2) in the Menopause Study Cohort

Total Hip (p; 95% CI) Femoral Neck (p; 95% CI) Lumbar Spine (p; 95% CI)
Black Women Non-Black Women Black Women Non-Black Women Black women Non-Black Women
HIV+ serostatus 0.58 (0.064; −0.033, 1.20) 0.55 (0.037;1.064,0.033) 0.81 (0.027; 0.095, 1.53) −0.53 (0.10; −1.17, 0.11) −0.17 (0.63; −0.86, 0.53) −0.63 (0.15; −1.49, 0.23)
BMI (kg/m2) 0.040 (0.060; −0.0016, 0.082) 0.054 (0.011; 0.013, 0.096) 0.031 (0.21; −0.018, 0.080) 0.042 (0.089; −0.0065, 0.090) 0.099 (<0.0001; 0.054, 0.15) 0.089 (0.0048; 0.028, 0.15)
Menopause status (time 1 & 2)
Pre-menopausal (1)
Pre-menopausal (2)
Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
Pre-menopausal (1)
Peri-menopausal (2)
1.022 (0.014;1.83,0.21) −0.17 (0.67; −0.96, 0.61) −0.80 (0.10; −1.76, 0.15) −0.65 (0.18; −1.61, 0.30) 1.20 (0.011;2.13,0.28) −0.090 (0.89; −1.38, 1.20)
Peri-menopausal (1)
Peri-menopausal (2)
0.76 (0.050;1.52,0.0013) −0.46 (0.15; −1.093, 0.17) −0.67 (0.14; −1.56, 0.23) −0.082 (0.84; −0.86, 0.69) −0.12 (0.79; −0.98, 0.74) −0.32 (0.54; −1.36, 0.72)
Peri-menopausal (1)
Post-menopausal (2)
1.89 (0.0017;3.057,0.72) 1.50 (0.0047;2.53,0.46) −0.73 (0.29; −2.08, 0.62) −0.95 (0.13; −2.19; 0.28) −0.35 (0.59; −1.66, 0.95) −0.73 (0.39; −2.39, 0.93)
Post-menopausal (1)
Post-menopausal (2)
1.29 (0.033;2.47,0.11) −0.84 (0.090; −1.81, 0.13) −0.91 (0.20; −2.30, 0.49) −0.29 (0.63; −1.46, 0.88) −0.70 (0.30; −2.054, 0.64) −0.33 (0.68; −1.90, 1.24)
FSH (IU/L) −0.0058 (0.56; −0.025, 0.014) −0.0096 (0.24; −0.026, 0.0064) −0.00075 (0.94; −0.022, 0.020) 0.0024 (0.80; −0.016, 0.021) 0.029 (0.0057;0.049,0.0085) −0.012 (0.34; −0.037, 0.013)

Abbreviations: BMD: bone mineral density; CI: confidence interval; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; BMI: body mass index. Models are adjusted for baseline BMD, age, BMI, menopause status at time 1 and 2 (reference value is premenopausal at time 1 and 2), smoking pack years, methadone use, HIV status, HCV status, FSH level, 25OH vitamin D

Annual % Change in BMD among HIV-infected Women Only

Table 4 shows sub-analyses performed in HIV-infected women. Although initiation of antiretroviral therapy in treatment-naive women was not associated with loss of BMD at any site, re-initiation of ART in treatment-experienced women was associated with loss of FN BMD. Tenofovir initiation was not associated with loss of BMD, whereas tenofovir discontinuation was associated with increases in FN and LS BMD. Other HIV-related factors such as CD4+ count, history of AIDS defining illness, and duration of HIV diagnosis were not associated with change in BMD at any site. The relationship between menopause and TH bone loss was similar in the subset of HIV-infected women to that observed in the overall cohort, although the magnitude of loss was slightly greater in HIV-infected women.

Table 4.

Factors Associated with % Annual Change in BMD (g/cm2) among HIV+ Women in the Menopause Study Cohort

Total Hip (p value; 95% CI) Femoral Neck (p value; 95% CI) Lumbar Spine (p value; 95% CI)
Black race 0.72 (0.016; 0.14, 1.30) 0.69 (0.029; 0.073, 1.30) 0.58 (0.15; −0.21, 1.36)
BMI (kg/m2) 0.073 (0.0026; 0.026, 0.12) 0.072 (0.0043; 0.023, 0.12) 0.11 (0.0005; 0.046, 0.16)
Serum 25OH vitamin D (ng/mL) 0.033 (0.028; 0.0036, 0.062) 0.024 (0.12; −0.0060, 0.054) 0.044 (0.027; 0.0049, 0.082)
Menopause status: (time 1 & 2)
Pre-menopausal (1)
Pre-menopausal (2)
Reference Reference Reference
Pre-menopausal (1)
Peri-menopausal (2)
0.88 (0.039;1.71,0.046) −0.51 (0.27; −1.42, 0.40) −1.054 (0.077; −2.22, 0.11)
Peri-menopausal (1)
Peri-menopausal (2)
−0.63 (0.091; −1.35, 0.10) −0.73 (0.071; −1.52, 0.062) −0.99 (0.055; −1.99, 0.021)
Peri-menopausal (1)
Post-menopausal (2)
1.70 (0.0015;2.74,0.66) −1.068 (0.059; −2.18, 0.042) −0.88 (0.22; −2.29, 0.54)
Post-menopausal (1)
Post-menopausal (2)
1.38 (0.011;2.43,0.33) −1.025 (0.077; −2.16, 0.11) −1.21 (0.10; −2.67, 0.25)
Antiretroviral therapy use
Never use Reference Reference Reference
Initiation (naïve) −1.39 (0.21; −3.57, 0.79) −2.092 (0.063; −4.30, 0.12) −0.37 (0.80; −3.20, 2.46)
Discontinuation 0.66 (0.31; −0.61, 1.93) −0.083 (0.91; −1.49, 1.32) −0.63 (0.49; −2.42, 1.17)
Re-initiation −0.50 (0.39; −1.67, 0.66) 1.85 (0.0054;3.15,0.55) −0.12 (0.88; −1.75, 1.51)
Continuous use 0.48 (0.25; −0.35, 1.32) −0.14 (0.76; −1.074, 0.79) 0.44 (0.47; −0.75, 1.62)
Tenofovir use
Never use Reference Reference Reference
Initiation −0.19 (0.55; −0.82, 0.44) −0.098 (0.77; −0.77, 0.57) −0.66 (0.13; −1.52, 0.19)
Discontinuation −0.67 (0.62; −3.30, 1.96) 4.75 (0.0021; 1.74, 7.76) 4.03 (0.038; 0.22, 7.84)
Continuous use 0.26 (0.73; −1.25, 1.77) 1.57 (0.070; −0.13, 3.28) 0.91 (0.41; −1.27, 3.094)

Abbreviations: BMD: bone mineral density; CI: confidence interval; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; BMI: body mass index. Models are adjusted for baseline BMD, age, race, BMI, menopause status at time 1 and 2 (reference value is premenopausal at both times 1 and 2), smoking, methadone use, HCV status, FSH level, 25OH vitamin D level, AIDS history, CD4+ count, log10HIV RNA, length of HIV diagnosis, tenofovir use and HAART use

Differences in Bone Turnover Markers

Levels of baseline bone formation (BAP and OC) and resorption (CTX) markers correlated inversely with baseline BMD at all three sites among HIV-infected women (p<.05), but only BAP was significantly correlated with change in BMD over time, and only at the lumbar spine (r=0.13, p<.05) (data not shown). In multivariable, race-stratified analyses of baseline BMD which included BTMs, none of the BTMs were associated with baseline BMD at any site among black women. Among non-black women however, BAP was associated with reduced BMD at all sites, and CTX was associated with reduced baseline LS BMD. In longitudinal multivariable analyses, BTMs were not predictive of BMD change at any site among black women, and for non-black women, only osteocalcin was associated with increase in FN BMD (data not shown). None of the BTMs were associated with change in BMD at any site in the full Menopause Study cohort. In the subset of HIV-infected women, log10BAP was associated with higher BMD at the femoral neck only (1.81%/y for each 10-fold change in BAP in mcg/L; p=0.036, 95% CI: 0.12–3.50).

DISCUSSION

We observed significant racial differences in risks for bone loss in this cohort of middle-aged HIV-infected and at-risk women. In particular, we found that the effects of HIV infection on BMD over time were very different for black women and non-black women. Although HIV infection was associated with bone loss among non-black women, this was not the case among black women. In analyses of the entire Menopause Study cohort, HIV was not associated with change in BMD; however this is likely due to the differential effect of HIV among black vs. non-black women, which became evident only upon conducting race-stratified analyses and testing for an interaction between race and HIV status, which was statistically significant. It is well known that race and ethnicity are important factors influencing the incidence of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture, yet studies conducted in HIV-infected persons have not specifically examined the contribution of race to bone loss.

Annual fractures and costs in the United States are projected to grow by 50% between 2005 and 2025, surpassing 3 million and $25 billion, respectively. Nonwhite populations will comprise a growing proportion of total osteoporosis fractures and related costs; in 2005, 12% of all fractures occurred in nonwhites, but by 2025, this percentage is expected to rise to 21% [24.] Rates of osteoporosis for white and hispanic women have declined, but not for African American women, according to data from Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1988–94, and NHANES 2005–06, although these differences are unexplained [25.] While the relative risk of fractures is lower in minority women compared with white women, their absolute risk of fracture is still significant [26]. Within 1 year in the Observational Study of the Women’s Health Initiative, fractures were more common in minority women than myocardial infarction/coronary heart disease death, stroke, and breast cancer combined [27.] Consequences of osteoporotic hip fracture also differ by ethnicity and race, and mortality after hip fracture is higher for African American women compared with white women [28.] Although data on outcomes after hip fracture in non-white populations are limited, one study found the percentage of patients with hip fracture who were non-ambulatory at discharge was six times higher among African American women compared with white women [29.] Understanding racial and ethnic differences in risk for osteoporosis and fracture, as well as the health consequences of these fractures, will be crucial in order to develop interventions to reduce the burden of disease. For HIV-infected women, it will be important to determine whether the relationship between BMD and fracture varies by race, or differs from that observed in uninfected women, and what the consequences of osteoporotic fractures are in terms of pain, disability, and mortality as the HIV-infected population ages.

While BTMs were associated with baseline BMD in the Menopause Study cohort, they were not particularly predictive of BMD change, regardless of HIV status. Additionally, BTMs did not perform as well in black women compared with non-black women, and BTMs were neither associated with baseline BMD nor BMD change in black women. Our results differ somewhat from the findings of Yin et al, who conducted a small prospective cohort study of 128 (73 HIV+, 55 HIV−) postmenopausal Hispanic and African-American women and found that HIV status was associated with bone loss at the LS, TH, and ultra-distal radius (UDR), although age, race/ethnicity, and BMI were not associated with change in BMD at any site [10.] In that study, HIV-infected women had significantly higher levels of OC and CTx compared with uninfected women, and among HIV-infected women, serum NTx predicted bone loss at the distal radius and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and serum NTx predicted bone loss at the UDR. Our study differed from Yin’s in that we did not limit our study to postmenopausal women, nor to only racial and ethnic minority women; furthermore we recruited HIV-uninfected subjects to have similar behavioral risk factors as the HIV-infected subjects, rather than recruiting from general medical ambulatory clinics.

Our finding that HIV-infection was associated with bone loss in non-black women is somewhat surprising, as most published longitudinal studies in HIV-infected adults have shown a decline in BMD within the first two years of HAART initiation, and stable BMD thereafter, and the majority of Menopause Study participants were antiretroviral treatment experienced and maintained on continuous therapy [3033.] Initiation of HAART among antiretroviral naive women was not associated significantly with bone loss, however only 8 (3%) of the HIV-infected participants were antiretroviral therapy naive HAART initiators, and thus we were likely underpowered to observe effects of HAART on BMD in naive subjects, who would be expected to experience the greatest amount of antiretroviral therapy associated bone loss.

In this treatment experienced cohort, continuous antiretroviral therapy was not associated with bone loss, whereas re-initiation of ART was independently associated with reductions in BMD. Initiation of tenofovir during the study period was not associated with loss of BMD, unlike other reports associating tenofovir with accelerated BMD loss [3438]. We found higher BMD at the FN and LS after tenofovir discontinuation, although our findings must be regarded with caution given the small numbers of HIV-infected women stopping tenofovir and unclear indications for its discontinuation. Others have described bone recovery after discontinuation of tenofovir, although these studies have been limited by non-randomized design [39] and small sample size [39, 40], and were conducted in predominantly white men [39, 40].

We were able to characterize not only the effect of the menopausal transition on BMD in HIV-infected and uninfected women, but also the influence of race. We found that the greatest amount of bone loss with menopause was seen at the total hip, particularly in black women. Bone loss was greatest for women as they transitioned from perimenopause to postmenopause, however postmenopausal women continued to lose more bone than women who remained premenopausal or perimenopausal throughout. These relationships were similar in the subset of HIV-infected women, who also had significant bone loss at the lumbar spine, associated with transition into perimenopause, or remaining in perimenopause. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the specific effect of the menopausal transition on BMD in HIV-infected women, or racial differences in bone loss with menopause. The Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) Bone Study measured BMD at the LS and TH annually in a large multiethnic cohort of women and found little change in BMD during pre- or early perimenopause, marked acceleration of bone loss in late perimenopause and continued loss in postmenopause; however ethnic differences in rates of bone loss were largely eliminated after controlling for body weight [41.] Like SWAN, we found that the greatest amount of bone loss occurred as menopause approached, followed by the postmenopausal state. However unlike SWAN, we observed significant differences in bone loss by race despite adjusting for BMI, and in our study a greater amount of TH bone loss occurred than LS. A 10-year study in the SWAN found that annual transmenopausal (from 1 year before to 2 years after Final Menstrual Period) FN bone loss was greater in Asians and less in African Americans when compared with whites, and that African American women experienced less transmenopausal LS bone loss; however racial/ethnic differences in 10-year cumulative bone loss were small, and on the order of 1–2% [42]. Similar to our results, in that study, BMI independent racial/ethnic variation in bone loss were observed, and greater BMI and African American heritage were related to slower bone loss rates.

Our study has several limitations. Only a sub-set of the entire cohort had a repeat DEXA due to loss to follow-up, which may have resulted in a selection bias. Characteristics of those women who completed one DEXA and those who completed two DEXA scans were similar in terms of risk factors for osteoporosis, however. Because our data was collected as part of an observational study, our findings are subject to possible unmeasured confounding. Additionally because our cohort included only women with or at-risk for HIV infection, results are not generalizable to HIV-infected men, however because we were interested in understanding the relationship between menopause and bone loss, our study could only have been performed in a female population. Our study also has a number of strengths, particularly the inclusion of an HIV-uninfected comparison group with similar behavioral risk profiles and demographics to the HIV-infected group, and large number of women under study over five years. Lastly, the Menopause Study cohort was designed specifically to examine metabolic complications of HIV infection in women as they transition through menopause, and thus uniquely poised to evaluate the effects of menopause on bone mineral density, which has not previously been well characterized.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant racial differences in risks for bone loss exist among middle-aged HIV-infected and uninfected women. The effects of HIV infection on BMD over time are very different for black women and non-black women, as is the amount of bone loss associated with the menopausal transition. Determining the extent to which the effect of HIV on fracture risk varies by race will be crucial to identify HIV-infected women at greatest risk for osteoporotic fracture, particularly as they enter menopause. It is unclear whether current algorithms to evaluate fracture risk can accurately estimate the probability of fracture among HIV-infected women, and what the relative importance of race is in predicting fracture risk in HIV-infected women. Understanding racial and ethnic differences in risk for osteoporosis and fracture, as well as the health consequences of these fractures, will be crucial in order to develop interventions such as evidence-based screening recommendations, to reduce the burden of osteoporotic disease among HIV-infected women as they enter menopause.

Highlights.

  • The association of HIV and bone mineral density differs strikingly by race.

  • Menopause-associated bone loss was greater in black women than non-black women.

  • HIV infection was associated with total hip bone loss in non-black women.

  • Re-initiation of antiretrovirals was associated with reduced bone mineral density.

  • Tenofovir discontinuation was associated with increase in bone mineral density.

Acknowledgments

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01 DA13564 to E.E.S. and R03 DA029460 to A.S.); the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (K23AR061993 to A.S.); and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Physician Faculty Scholars Program (to A.S.).

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Disclosure Statement. All authors: no conflicts of interest.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Brown TT, Qaqish RB. Antiretroviral therapy and the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis: a meta-analytic review. AIDS. 2006 Nov 14;20(17):2165–74. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32801022eb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Triant VA, Brown TT, Lee H, Grinspoon SK. Fracture prevalence among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected versus non-HIV-infected patients in a large U.S. healthcare system. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Sep;93(9):3499–504. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Womack JA, Goulet JL, Gibert C, Brandt C, Chang CC, Gulanski B, Fraenkel L, Mattocks K, Rimland D, Rodriguez-Barradas MC, Tate J, Yin MT, Justice AC Veterans Aging Cohort Study Project Team. Increased risk of fragility fractures among HIV infected compared to uninfected male veterans. PLoS One. 2011 Feb 16;6(2):e17217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Young B, Dao CN, Buchacz K, Baker R, Brooks JT HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) Investigators. Increased rates of bone fracture among HIV-infected persons in the HIV Outpatient Study (HOPS) compared with the US general population, 2000–2006. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Apr 15;52(8):1061–8. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dolan SE, Huang JS, Killilea KM, Sullivan MP, Aliabadi N, Grinspoon S. Reduced bone mineral density in HIV-infected women. AIDS. 2004;18:475–83. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200402200-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yin M, Dobkin J, Brudney K, et al. Bone mass and mineral metabolism in HIV+ postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16:1345–52. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-1845-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Teichmann J, Stephan E, Lange U, et al. Osteopenia in HIV-infected women prior to highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Infect. 2003;46:221–7. doi: 10.1053/jinf.2002.1109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dolan SE, Kanter JR, Grinspoon S. Longitudinal analysis of bone density in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(8):2938–2945. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yin MT, Lu D, Cremers S, Tien PC, Cohen MH, Shi Q, Shane E, Golub ET, Anastos K. Short-term bone loss in HIV-infected premenopausal women. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Feb 1;53(2):202–8. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181bf6471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yin MT, Zhang CA, McMahon DJ, Ferris DC, Irani D, Colon I, Cremers S, Shane E. Higher rates of bone loss in postmenopausal HIV-infected women: a longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Feb;97(2):554–62. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Reeve J, Walton J, Russell LJ, Lunt M, Wolman R, Abraham R, Justice J, Nicholls A, Wardley-Smith B, Green JR, Mitchell A. Determinants of the first decade of bone loss after menopause at spine, hip, and radius. QJM. 1999;92:261–273. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/92.5.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Falch JA, Sandvik L. Perimenopausal appendicular bone loss: a 10-year prospective study. Bone. 1990;11:425–428. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(90)90138-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hansen MA, Overgaard K, Riis B, Christiansen C. Role of peak bone mass and bone loss in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 12 year study. BMJ. 1991;303:961–964. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6808.961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Miller SA, Santoro N, Lo Y, et al. Menopause symptoms in HIV-infected and drug-using women. Menopause. 2005;12:348–56. doi: 10.1097/01.gme.0000141981.88782.38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.World Health Organization. Research on the Menopause in the 1990s: Report of a WHO Scientific Working Group. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 1996. WHO Technical Report Series No. 866. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mayfield DG, McCleod G, He YD. The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. Am J Psych. 1974;131:1121–1123. doi: 10.1176/ajp.131.10.1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385–401. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Metzger DS, Koblin B, Turner C, et al. Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. HIVNET Vaccine Preparedness Study Protocol Team. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:99–106. doi: 10.1093/aje/152.2.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Harrell FE. Regression Modeling Strategies. New York: Springer; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Flom PL, Cassell DL. Stopping Stepwise: Why stepwise and similar methods are bad and what you should use instead. Abstract Presented at Northeast SAS Users Group; Baltimore. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Efron B, Hastie T, Johnstone I, Tibshirani R. Least Angle Regression. Ann Statist. 2004;32 (2):407–499. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Arnsten JH, Freeman R, Howard AA, Floris-Moore M, Santoro N, Schoenbaum EE. HIV infection and bone mineral density in middle-aged women. Clinical infectious diseases. 2006;42(7):1014–1020. doi: 10.1086/501015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sharma A, Cohen HW, Freeman R, Santoro N, Schoenbaum EE. Prospective Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density among Middle-Aged HIV-Infected and Uninfected Women: Association between Methadone Use and Bone Loss. Maturitas. 2011 Nov;70(3):295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22:465–475. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.061113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Looker AC, Melton LJ, 3rd, Harris TB, Borrud LG, Shepherd JA. Prevalence and trends in low femur bone density among older US adults: NHANES 2005–2006 compared with NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:64–71. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.090706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cummings SR, Melton LJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet. 2002;359:1761–1767. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08657-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cauley JA, Wampler NS, Barnhart JM, Wu L, Allison M, Chen Z, Hendrix S, Robbins J, Jackson RD Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. . Incidence of fractures compared to cardiovascular disease and breast cancer: The Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:1717–1723. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0634-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jacobsen SJ, Goldberg J, Miles TP, Brody JA, Stiers W, Rimm AA. Race and sex differences in mortality following fracture of the hip. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:1147–1150. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.8.1147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Furstenberg AL, Mezey MD. Differences in outcome between black and white elderly hip fracture patients. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:931–938. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90142-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McComsey GA, Kitch D, Daar ES, et al. Bone mineral density and fractures in antiretroviral-naive persons randomized to receive abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine along with efavirenz or atazanavir-ritonavir: Aids Clinical Trials Group A5224s, a substudy of ACTG A5202. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:1791–801. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brown TT, McComsey GA, King MS, Qaqish RB, Bernstein BM, da Silva BA. Loss of bone mineral density after antiretroviral therapy initiation, independent of antiretroviral regimen. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009 Aug 15;51(5):554–61. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181adce44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mallon PW. HIV and bone mineral density. Curr Opi n Infect Dis. 2010 Feb;23(1):1–8. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328334fe9a. Review. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bolland MJ, Wang TK, Grey A, Gamble GD, Reid IR. Stable bone density in HAART-treated individuals with HIV: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Sep;96(9):2721–31. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cassetti I, Madruga JV, Suleiman JM, et al. The safety and efficacy of tenofovir DF in combination with lamivudine and efavirenz through 6 years in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-1-infected patients. HIV Clin Trials. 2007;8:164–72. doi: 10.1310/hct0803-164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Martin A, Bloch M, Amin J, Baker D, Cooper DA, Emery S, Carr A. Simplification of antiretroviral therapy with tenofovir-emtricitabine or abacavir-Lamivudine: a randomized, 96-week trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Nov 15;49(10):1591–601. doi: 10.1086/644769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.McComsey GA, Kitch D, Daar ES, et al. Bone mineral density and fractures in antiretroviral-naive persons randomized to receive abacavir-lamivudine or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine along with efavirenz or atazanavir-ritonavir: AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5224s, a substudy of ACTG A5202. J Infect Dis. 2011;203:1791–801. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Haskelberg H, Hoy JF, Amin J, et al. Changes in bone turnover and bone loss in HIV-infected patients changing treatment to tenofovir-emtricitabine or abacavir-lamivudine. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38377. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rasmussen TA, Jensen D, Tolstrup M, et al. Comparison of bone and renal effects in HIV-infected adults switching to abacavir or tenofovir based therapy in a randomized trial. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bloch M, Tong WW, Hoy J, Baker D, Lee FJ, Richardson R, Carr A TROP (Switch from Tenofovir to Raltegravir for Low Bone Density) study team. Switch from tenofovir to raltegravir increases low bone mineral density and decreases markers of bone turnover over 48 weeks. HIV Med. 2014 Jul;15(6):373–80. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12123. Epub 2014 Jan 26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Negredo E, Domingo P, Pérez-Álvarez N, Gutiérrez M, Mateo G, Puig J, Escrig R, Echeverría P, Bonjoch A, Clotet B. Improvement in bone mineral density after switching from tenofovir to abacavir in HIV-1-infected patients with low bone mineral density: two-centre randomized pilot study (OsteoTDF study) J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69 (12):3368–3371. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Finkelstein JS, Brockwell SE, Mehta V, Greendale GA, Sowers MR, Ettinger B, Lo JC, Johnston JM, Cauley JA, Danielson ME, Neer RM. Bone Mineral Density Changes during the Menopause Transition in a Multiethnic Cohort of Women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(3):861–868. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-1876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Greendale GA, Sowers M, Han W, Huang M, Finkelstein JS, Crandall CJ, Lee JS, Karlamangla AS. Bone Mineral Density Loss in Relation to the Final Menstrual Period in a Multiethnic Cohort: Results from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN) JBMR. 2012 Jan;27(1):111–118. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES