Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
To describe the implementation process of a birth preparation program, the activities in the protocol for physical and birth preparation exercises, and the educational activities that have been evaluated regarding effectiveness and women's satisfaction. The birth preparation program described was developed with the following objectives: to prevent lumbopelvic pain, urinary incontinence and anxiety; to encourage the practice of physical activity during pregnancy and of positions and exercises for non-pharmacological pain relief during labor; and to discuss information that would help women to have autonomy during labor.
METHODS:
The program comprised the following activities: supervised physical exercise, relaxation exercises, and educational activities (explanations of lumbopelvic pain prevention, pelvic floor function, labor and delivery, and which non-pharmacological pain relief to use during labor) provided regularly after prenatal consultations. These activities were held monthly, starting when the women joined the program at 18–24 weeks of pregnancy and continuing until 30 weeks of pregnancy, fortnightly thereafter from 31 to 36 weeks of pregnancy, and then weekly from the 37th week until delivery. Information and printed materials regarding the physical exercises to be performed at home were provided. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01155804.
RESULTS:
The program was an innovative type of intervention that systematized birth preparation activities that were organized to encompass aspects related both to pregnancy and to labor and that included physical, educational and home-based activities.
CONCLUSIONS:
The detailed description of the protocol used may serve as a basis for further studies and also for the implementation of birth preparation programs within the healthcare system in different settings.
Keywords: Antenatal education, Exercise, Labor pain, Pain management, Pelvic floor
INTRODUCTION
Pregnancy and childbirth involve physiological, emotional and social changes, and it is important during this period to implement lifestyle changes that will benefit both maternal and fetal well-being. Within the context of healthcare for pregnant woman, structured birth preparation programs using a multidisciplinary approach play an important role; such programs are being recommended for pregnant women and their partners (1–3). Topics related to pregnancy, childbirth, puerperium, newborn infant care, the physical and emotional changes experienced during pregnancy, fears and fantasies regarding childbirth and puerperium, and the insecurity associated with becoming parents should be discussed during pregnancy in an attempt to minimize anxieties (4–6). These interventions should also include a set of activities that allow women the opportunity to experience labor and childbirth as physiological processes and to feel that they are in control of the situation (1).
Birth preparation is a broad term that includes diverse interventions and the work of different healthcare professionals (7), and this makes the evaluation and standardization of effective practices difficult. Although birth preparation programs are common in many countries, scientific evidence confirming their benefits and establishing the optimal way in which to organize and systematize actions to ensure that they are effective is scarce (8–11). Studies have evaluated isolated activities included in the interventions comprising a birth preparation program but have not assessed the complete set of actions of a program, their effectiveness, or the regularity required to ensure their effectiveness. Examples include studies on pelvic floor muscle exercises for urinary incontinence (12), exercises to prevent lumbopelvic pain (7,13–15) and techniques to improve self-control during labor (16–18).
Even when shown to be effective, the techniques are heterogeneous, and there is little information on their benefits when offered in conjunction or organized into a systematic program. This situation makes it difficult to reach a consensus on the best interventions necessary and the ideal number of meetings to reach effectiveness. Despite the recognition of the relevance of birth preparation programs by health care authorities in various countries (1,19), the difficulty in making these programs available lies in the lack of evaluation of the proposed practices and the scarcity of available published information.
Within the context of public health, the observation of beneficial results within a broader program could bring significant changes in the approach to prenatal care offered to pregnant women. Therefore, the objective of the present article was to describe the implementation process and the activities included in a birth preparation protocol that has been evaluated for its effectiveness.
METHODS
The birth preparation program (BPP) described in this paper was developed in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Woman's Hospital, Universidade de Campinas (UNICAMP), a referral maternity hospital for the care of high-risk pregnant women, and in four primary municipal healthcare centers in the same city.
The Institutional Review Board of the School of Medicine, Universidade de Campinas (UNICAMP), approved the study protocol under the registration number 407/2008. The study was also registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01155804).
The main objectives of the BPP interventions were: 1) to prevent lumbopelvic pain, urinary incontinence and anxiety, 2) to encourage the practice of physical activity during pregnancy, 3) to practice positions and exercises to be used for non-pharmacological pain relief during labor, and 4) to discuss basic information that would help women have autonomy during labor.
The efficacy of this program was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial (20) that assessed the effectiveness of the BPP for the prevention of pain, urinary incontinence and anxiety during pregnancy and evaluated perinatal outcomes by comparing nulliparous women enrolled in the program with pregnant women who did not participate in the program. The main positive effects resulting from the BPP included a lower risk of developing urinary incontinence, better compliance with the regular practice of physical exercise and lower levels of anxiety (20). The qualitative evaluation showed that the guidance provided at the BPP meetings and the use of non-pharmacological pain relief techniques improved women's self-control during labor, with all the women reporting satisfaction with the birthing experience (21).
Before the implementation of the BPP, there was no systematic birth preparation program at our maternity hospital, and participation in a prenatal exercise program, offered once a week and at a different time from prenatal consultation, was optional. The municipal healthcare centers in which the BPP was implemented did not previously offer prenatal exercise programs nor did they have professionals trained to conduct birth preparation activities with the pregnant women.
Because the activities included in the BPP were not part of the routine services provided during prenatal care, the physical space had to be negotiated with the directors of both the maternity and the healthcare units and adapted to all the activities included in the program that was to be implemented. In the maternity hospital, the encounters were held in groups in the physiotherapy clinic or, when that was unavailable, at the outpatient clinic. In the health centers, the encounters took place in doctors' visiting rooms or in spaces such as waiting rooms that were not in use at the time of the BPP. The only support material required for the practice of physical, relaxation, and non-pharmacological pain control exercises were mats. The materials required for the educational activities were already available at the maternity clinic and were replicated for the health centers.
Description of the BPP interventions
The meetings occurred on the days of the prenatal visits to facilitate participation and compliance with the program. They were held monthly from the time the woman joined the program at 18–24 weeks of pregnancy until 30 weeks of pregnancy, fortnightly thereafter from 31 to 36 weeks of pregnancy, and weekly from the 37th week of pregnancy until delivery. The BPP activities were provided by physiotherapists trained to conduct the activities included in the program and were supervised by an obstetrician, a psychologist and a physiotherapist, all with experience working with women during pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium.
The activities developed by the BPP comprised supervised exercises, educational activities and physical activities to be performed at home. The activities were planned and structured especially for this program, based on the need to prevent the discomforts of pregnancy (pain, urinary incontinence, and edema) (13,22–26), to encourage the regular practice of aerobic exercise (27) and to alleviate anxiety in relation to childbirth (1).
Supervised exercises
The exercises were performed under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The same protocol was applied at all the meetings. It comprised light and moderate exercises that lasted approximately 50 minutes. The protocol included general stretching exercises, with particular emphasis on exercises for the spine and exercises to stimulate venous flow in the lower limbs, to strengthen the transversus abdominis, gluteal and quadriceps muscles, as well as pelvic floor muscle training and breathing and relaxation techniques (Table 1).
Table 1.
Position: Standing | ||
Head and neck stretches | Flexion, extension, lateral bending | Hold each position for 20 seconds |
Side bends | With one arm raised, bend trunk laterally to the opposite side | Hold for 20 seconds on each side |
Pelvic mobilization | Perform anteversion, retroversion and circumduction of the hip | One minute |
Pelvic tilts with pelvic floor muscle training | Perineal exercises performed with the pelvis tilted backward | 15 rapid contractions |
Stimulation of venous flow in the lower limbs | Plantar flexion | One minute |
Stimulation of venous flow in the lower limbs | Squatting using support equipment such as the back of a chair, a wall bar or a stick | 2 series of 10 repetitions |
Abdominal activation | Contract the transversus abdominis muscle while breathing out | 15 repetitions |
Position: Seated (using an exercise mat) | ||
Stretching | Triceps brachial muscle; pectoral muscles; posterior thoracic region; hip abductor muscles; posterior thigh muscles | Hold for 20 seconds each |
Pelvic floor muscle training | With thighs flexed and abducted and the soles of the feet together, perform perineal exercises. | 15 rapid contractions; 15 contractions held for 10 seconds with a 5-second resting period |
Position: On all fours | ||
Mobilization of the spine and pelvis | Breathe in, facing forwards, and tilt the pelvis forward; breathe out, lowering head (blow onto stomach) and tilt the pelvis backward. | 10 repetitions |
Abdominal activation | Contract the abdomen while breathing out slowly, as if trying to make the belly button touch the back. | 15 repetitions |
Back stretching | Sitting on heels with knees apart, raise arms above head, rest arms and forehead on the mat. | Hold position for 20 seconds |
Position: Lateral Decubitus | ||
Stretching and stimulation of the venous circulation in the lower limbs | Flexion/extension of the ankle with one leg raised. | 3 series of 20 seconds on each side |
Stretching and trunk rotation | With hips and knees flexed and knees together, rotate the trunk in the opposite direction | Hold for 20 seconds |
Position: Dorsal Decubitus | ||
Stretching and relaxing the lumbopelvic region | With knees flexed and apart, raise both legs up to the chest and hold; perform flexion/extension of the ankles, swinging the trunk slightly to each side | Hold for one minute |
Manual traction of the spine | With knees flexed and feet flat on the mat, the woman is asked to raise her hips. On lowering hips while breathing out, the therapist, with one hand on the sacral region, performs traction in the caudal direction. | Hold for one minute |
Relaxation in lateral decubitus | ||
Breathing training for labor | Diaphragmatic breathing with prolonged exhalation through pursed lips. | 3 minutes |
Relaxation | Progressive relaxation; massage; visualization. | 7 minutes |
Educational activities
Following the exercise sessions, educational activities were conducted at all the meetings. At the first and second meetings, the topics covered included the prevention of lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy and the role of the pelvic floor muscles in pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium. From the 34th week of pregnancy onwards, information was provided on the physiology of labor and non-pharmacological pain control techniques to be used during uterine contractions in labor and delivery. The information provided was discussed, and the subject was raised again at subsequent meetings whenever the women expressed interest in readdressing a certain topic, doubts or questions. All the topics dealt with in the educational activities, as well as the explanations and guidance given during the exercises, followed a script that had been pre-tested and adapted into informal language to facilitate understanding (Table 2).
Table 2.
Postural alterations and pain prevention in pregnancyDuring pregnancy, various changes occur in the pregnant woman's body, and some of these may cause discomfort. Certain attitudes adopted in daily life may avoid or minimize these discomforts. |
|
The role of the pelvic floor muscles in pregnancy and childbirthThe pelvic floor comprises a set of muscles that function to support the internal organs. Weakening of these muscles may lead to dysfunction. |
|
Labor and breathing during the expulsive phaseLabor can be compared to a trip you are going on to fetch your baby. This trip is divided into three parts: the first is long and difficult; the second is short and nice; and the third you often do not even see. |
|
Pain relief techniques for labor During labor, the contractions may range from uncomfortable to quite painful. This depends to a great extent on the woman and on how labor occurs. To facilitate self-control, there are some non-pharmacological techniques that help reduce anxiety, tension and pain. |
|
Activities to be performed at home
Due to the periodicity with which the women participated in their BPP group, a pamphlet was produced describing activities to be performed at home between one meeting and the next. At the first meeting, the participants were given the pamphlet describing these activities, which comprised pelvic floor muscle training with rapid and sustained contractions, stretching exercises for the spine and exercises to stimulate venous flow from the lower limbs. The women were also encouraged to practice aerobic exercises three to five times weekly. Because these activities were unsupervised, the participants received additional written instructions regarding signs at which these exercises should be halted (27). These signs included the following: vaginal bleeding; chest or abdominal pain; amniotic fluid leakage; strong, persistent headache; palpitations, dizziness or a sensation of flashing lights; sudden swelling in the hands, face or feet; decreased fetal movement; pain or a burning sensation at urination; fever; persistent nausea or vomiting; frequent uterine contractions; and dyspnea at rest (Table 3).
Table 3.
Pelvic floor muscle training | In any position, perform rapid contractions of the pelvic floor muscles. 30 repetitions. |
Seated with your legs abducted and soles of the feet together, perform 20 contractions, holding each contraction for 10 seconds. | |
Mobilizing and stretching the spine | In dorsal decubitus with your knees apart and bent, raise your legs towards your chest. Hug your legs for 20 seconds. Then, gently turn your body from one side to the other, five times for each side. |
Get down on your hands and knees. As you breathe in, stretch your head and neck and tilt the pelvis forward. Breathe out, while gently circling your head and neck, and relaxing your back into a neutral position. 10 repetitions. | |
Sit on your heels with your knees apart. Bend over, keeping your arms above your head, and rest your forehead on the mat. Hold for 20 seconds. | |
Exercises to stimulate venous return | On foot, plantar flexion. 30 repetitions. |
In lateral decubitus and with one leg raised, rotate your ankle. Two series of 20 repetitions. Change sides, and repeat with the other leg. | |
Exercises for a healthy pregnancy | Walking, water aerobics, stationary bicycle or swimming – 30 minutes. Avoid the hottest times of the day (between 10 am and 3 pm), and eat something light 30 minutes before exercising. Use comfortable clothes and running shoes if you go walking or if you choose to exercise on a stationary bicycle. |
RESULTS
The BPP was organized to encompass aspects related to both pregnancy and labor and to allow physical, educational and home-based activities to be included. The program was also organized to facilitate participation so that women could participate in most of the group meetings from their inclusion at 18/24 weeks of pregnancy as well as to prevent or minimize the discomforts of pregnancy and to improve the woman's autonomy during labor without compromising maternal or fetal safety.
The BPP is an innovative type of intervention in the sense that it systematized a broad range of birth preparation activities and organized them into a program. The results of the program were statistically evaluated regarding its implementation, effectiveness and outcomes, and a qualitative study described the participants' birthing experiences (20,21).
The results of the evaluation showed that the program was ineffective in reducing lumbopelvic pain during pregnancy (20). One hypothesis for this finding is that the supervised practice of exercise, performed only on the days of the prenatal visit, was insufficient to avoid or minimize this type of pain. Indeed, studies in which better results were obtained were based on supervised exercise performed weekly or fortnightly (7,13–15). Encouraging pregnant women to participate in supervised exercise groups held on a weekly basis may prove a better strategy for preventing lumbopelvic pain.
DISCUSSION
In terms of public health policies, it has been shown that the participation of low-risk pregnant women in BPP and relaxation sessions may be effective in reducing the number of cesarean sections (28) and, furthermore, that the fear of childbirth was minimized in women who participated in exercise programs during their prenatal care (29). In Brazil, the option for a cesarean section was associated with a fear of pain at childbirth, although the majority of women preferred vaginal delivery (30,31). In Sweden, symptoms of anxiety in the first trimester of pregnancy considerably increased women's fear of childbirth and their preference for a cesarean section (32). However, data from the Listening to Mothers study (33) showed that only 34% of the participants reported having participated in childbirth classes during their current pregnancy, and the majority of these participants were primigravidas.
The interventions evaluated in the BPP encompassed aspects of preparation for childbirth that are proposed within the public health policies of Brazil (1,34), thus raising questions on routine practices and challenging them with evidence-based practices. These health policies are aimed at improving prenatal care, guaranteeing humanized quality care for women based on scientific evidence, avoiding unnecessary interventions and preserving women's autonomy (1,34). The effective practices that should be encouraged during labor include the presence of a companion of the woman's own choice, the use of non-pharmacological techniques for pain relief, the freedom to choose the position the woman prefers to be in, and encouragement to move around during labor (1,34).
Multidisciplinary care guarantees an integrated approach that complements the care provided at medical visits (1). To construct a broader, more comprehensive program requires the participation of different healthcare professionals working within their individual specialties to offer an enriching experience for the pregnant woman and her partner. Within the context of birth preparation, a multidisciplinary team is essential because the different approaches complement and enhance each other.
In the present study, scheduling the program for the days of prenatal medical consultation was a way to facilitate women's compliance, particularly of low-income women. Furthermore, having a multidisciplinary team already available contributed towards the low cost of implementing the program and to the richness of its content. The physical space used for the BPP activities was available at the institution without a need for adaptation because the space required for the proposed activities differed according to the number of participants to allow sufficient space for exercise mats to be spread out on the floor, enabling the exercises and educational activities to be performed.
The detailed description of the protocol used may serve as a basis for further studies and for the implementation of birth preparation programs in different settings within the public healthcare system. As the majority of the birth preparation programs or interventions in this area are still based exclusively on the experiences of the healthcare professionals who coordinate them (35), knowledge on which interventions are most effective in controlling the discomforts of pregnancy and preparing the women physically and emotionally for childbirth is a challenge that remains to be faced. The interventions that have proven safe and effective, as evaluated in systematic reviews, would form a theoretically ideal set of actions that, in turn, would be randomly tested on a larger scale to provide the information still required to implement practices in this area.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the State of São Paulo Foundation for the Support of Research (Fundac¸ão de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo – FAPESP) grant #08/10392-5. The first author received partial financial support from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES).
Footnotes
No potential conflict of interest was reported.
REFERENCES
- 1.Brasil . Ministério da Saúde: Parto, aborto e puerpério: assistência humanizada à mulher. Brasília. 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gagnon AJ, Sandall J. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (3) 2007. Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both; p. CDC002869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dragonas T, Christodoulou GN. Prenatal care. Clin Psychol Rev. 1998;18((2)):127–42. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00085-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Soifer R. Psicologia da gravidez, parto e puerpério. 6a Edic¸ão. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Szejer M. Nove meses na vida de uma mulher. São Paulo: Casa do psicólogo; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Simkin P. The meaning of labor pain. Birth. 2000;27((4)):254–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00254.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kashanian M, Akbari Z, Alizadeh MH. The effect of exercise on back pain and lordosis in pregnant women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;107((2)):160–1. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gagnon AJ, Sandall J. Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;((3)):CD002869. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002869.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lumbiganon P, Martis R, Laopaiboon M, Festin MR, Ho JJ, Hakimi M. Antenatal breastfeeding education for increasing breastfeeding duration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(9):CD006425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006425.pub3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kramer MS. Nutritional advice in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000149. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hodnett ED, Lauzon L. Antenatal education for self-diagnosis of the onset of active labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;((2)):CD000935. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hay-Smith J, Mørkved S, Fairbrother KA, Herbison GP. Pelvic floor muscle training for prevention and treatment of urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(4):CD007471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Garshasbi A, Faghih Zadeh S. The effect of exercise on the intensity of low back pain in pregnant women. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;88((3)):271–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Martins RF, Pinto e Silva JL. Tratamento da lombalgia e dor pélvica posterior na gestac¸ão por um método de exercícios. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2005;27((5)):275–82. doi: 10.1590/S0100-72032005000500008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kluge J, Hall D, Louw Q, Theron G, Grové D. Specific exercises to treat pregnancy-related low back pain in a South African population. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;113((3)):187–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.10.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kimber L, McNabb M, Mc Court C, Haines A, Brocklehurst P. Massage or music for pain relief in labour: a pilot randomised placebo controlled trial. Eur J Pain. 2008;12((8)):961–969. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gau ML, Chang CY, Tian SH, Lin KC. Effects of birth ball exercise on pain and self-efficacy during childbirth: a randomised controlled trial in Taiwan. Midwifery. 2011;27((6)):e293–300. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bergström M, Kieler H, Waldenström U. Psychoprophylaxis during labor: associations with labor-related outcomes and experience of childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89((6)):794–800. doi: 10.3109/00016341003694978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . London: 2008. Antenatal care. (guidance.nice.org.uk/cg62) [Google Scholar]
- 20.Miquelutti MA, Cecatti JG, Makuch MY. Evaluation of a birth preparation program on lumbopelvic pain, urinary incontinence, anxiety and exercise: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:154. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Miquelutti MA, Cecatti JG, Makuch MY. Antenatal education and the birthing experience of Brazilian women: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:171. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dumas GA, Reid JG, Wolf LA, Griffin MP, McGrath MJ. Exercise, posture, and back pain during pregnancy. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon) 1995;10((2)):104–9. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(95)92047-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kristiansson P, Svardsudd K, von Schoultz B. Back pain during pregnancy: a prospective study. Spine. 1996;21((6)):702–9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199603150-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Björklund K, Bergström S. Is pelvic pain in pregnancy a welfare complaint. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000;79((1)):24–30. doi: 10.1080/j.1600-0412.2000.079001024.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Scarpa KP, Herrmann V, Palma PC, Riccetto CL, Morais SS. Prevalence and correlates of stress urinary incontinence during pregnancy: a survey at UNICAMP Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17((3)):219–23. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1361-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Whitford HM, Alder B, Jones M. A cross-sectional study of knowledge and practice of pelvic floor exercises during pregnancy and associated symptoms of stress urinary incontinence in North-East Scotland. Midwifery. 2007;23((2)):204–17. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.ACOG Committee Obstetric Practice: ACOG Committee Opinion Number 267, January 2002: exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99((1)):171–3. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01749-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Khunpradit S, Tavender E, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Wasiak J, Gruen RL. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (6) 2011. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section; p. CD005528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Guszkowska M. The effect of exercise and childbirth classes on fear of childbirth and locus of labor pain control. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2014;27((2)):176–89. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2013.830107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Victora CG, Aquino EM, do Carmo Leal M, Monteiro CA, Barros FC, Szwarcwald CL. Maternal and child health in Brazil: progress and challenges. Lancet. 2011;377((9780)):1863–76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60138-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dias MA, Domingues RM, Pereira AP, Fonseca SC, Gama SG, Theme Filha MM, et al. The decision of women for cesarean birth: a case study in two units of the supplementary health care system of the State of Rio de Janeiro. Cienc Saude Coletiva. 2008;13((5)):1521–34. doi: 10.1590/S1413-81232008000500017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rubertsson C, Hellström J, Cross M, Sydsjö G. Anxiety in early pregnancy: prevalence and contributing factors. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014;17((3)):221–228. doi: 10.1007/s00737-013-0409-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S, Herrlich A. Major survey findings of Listening to Mothers (SM) III: pregnancy and birth. Report of the Third National U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences. J Perinat Educ. 2014;23((1)):9–16. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.23.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Brasil. Ministério da Saúde: Rede Cegonha . 2011. ( http://portal.saude.gov.br/PORTAL/SAUDE/GESTOR/AREA.CFM?ID_AREA = 1816) [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jaddoe VW. Antenatal education programmes: do they work? Lancet. 2009;374((9693)):863–4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61610-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]