Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Microbiology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Microbiology
. 2014 Feb;6(1):1–7.

Heterogeneity of Iranian clinical isolates of Mycobacterium fortuitum

Abdolrazagh Hashemi-Shahraki 1, Parvin Heidarieh 2,*, Maryam Biranvand 1, Saeed Zaker Bostanabad 3, Nasrin Sheikhi 4, Mohamad Hashemzadeh 1, Masume Karami 1, Mohammad Mehdi Feizabadi 5
PMCID: PMC4419039  PMID: 25954484

Abstract

Background and Objectives

The increase of infections caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is receiving increasing attention worldwide. Mycobacterium fortuitum is encountered with increasing frequency in clinical laboratories of Iran.

Materials and Methods

Sequence variation of 48 M. fortuitum clinical isolates, were investigated by sequence analysis of the 16S-23S Internal Transcribed Spacer.

Results

Twelve different sequence types (sequevar) were identified by sequence analysis of ITS region. Seven previously described sequevar including MfoA, MfoB, MfoC, MfoD, MfoE, MfoF and MfoG identified. Five novel sequevar namely MfoH, MfoI, MfoJ, MfoK and MfoL that were distinctly different from the previously described sequevar were detected among different clinical strains of M. fortuitum, from Iran.

Conclusion

This study showed that the ITS region possesses high discriminatory power between the clinical isolates up to the clonal level. The results also suggest the possibility of the existence of predominant clone of M. fortuitum in affected patients in Iran. The data also point to the conclusion that a large variety of M. fortuitum clone can produce disease although certain clones seem to be predominant.

Keywords: Mycobacterium fortuitum, ITS, diversity

INTRODUCTION

To date, the genus Mycobacterium comprises over 160 species (http://www.bacterio.cict.fr/). Several species other than M. tuberculosis, nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTMs), are becoming increasingly recognized as significant human pathogens (1). In the last decade, the rapid development of molecular techniques has led to a great increase in our knowledge about mycobacterial identification and typing (2). Methods for identification and typing of mycobacteria include nucleic acid probes (3), PCR hybridization with species-specific probes (4, 5), PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (6, 7) and nucleic acid sequencing (8). Identification of Mycobacterium species by conventional methods including growth characteristics and biochemical tests are time-consuming and often not unequivocal in their interpretation (2, 8). Currently, the widely accepted strategy formulated to improve methods of mycobacterial strain identification includes analysis of the gene encoding 16S rRNA, however this technique is unable to differentiate members of several closely related species called complex groups a result of small number of polymorphic positions within the 16S rRNA (8- 10).

Several studies have shown that sequencing of 16S-23S Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) gene sequencing could help to differentiate and identify the closely related mycobacterial species (11, 12). Studies aiming at the assessment of heterogeneity within M. fortuitum group have used different approaches, from phenotypic methods, conventional typing such as PFGE and ERIC, hsp65-PRA and sequence based approaches (13- 17).

Taxonomic status of species belongs to M. fortuitum group clearly addressed by sequencing methods (9). However, the possible correlation between the pathogenicity of the clinical isolates of M. fortuitum subsp. fortuitum in the host and their genotypes has not been extensively evaluated. Distinct ITS sequences namely sequevar found in the M. avium complex demostrated that the ITS region is suitable for differentiating strains within some mycobacterial species and has the potential to be used as a marker to distinguish clinically relevant subspecies (11, 12, 18).

In this study the ITS sequences of 48 Iranian M. fortuitum clinical isolates from different regions were investigated to understand the genetic diversity of the strains and their presumptive relationships with different clinical presentation of disease caused by this organism in Iran.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains

Mycobacterial strains investigated in the present study included 48 clinical isolates of Iranian M. fortiutum, which had been isolated in or referred to our laboratory, at Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Ahvaz, Iran. Case subjects were considered for inclusion if they met the 1997 American Thoracic Society criteria for NTM disease (19). Table 1 summarises patients’ histories. The strains were collected or recovered from the symptomatic patients during 2010-2013.

Table 1.

Characteristics of 48 Clinical isolates of Iranian M. fortuitum

Strains (Mf) Sample source G/Aa PMH Main symptoms Chest X-ray Diagnosis by clinical findings ITS sequevars*
7 Leg abscess F (66) Healthy Subcutaneous abscesses ND Tb K
9 BAL F (64) Kidney transplant recipient Fever, cough Irregular nodular lesions Tb F
10 BAL M (59) COPD Fever, cough Cavitation Tb A
11 Wound infection (2) F (62) HIV Fever, weight loss NA Tb E
12 BAL M (34) Chronic lymphocytic leukemia Dyspnea, cough Pleural effusion Tb C
13 Biopsy M (19) Soft tissue abscess Subcutaneous nodules ND Tb A
14 Blood M (44) BMT Fever, weight loss ND ND K
15 BAL F (71) Chronic bronchitis Dyspnea, cough Bilateral involvement Tb H
16 Blood F (47) BMT Fever, weight loss ND Fungal infection A
18 Sputum (3) F (66) COPD Dyspnea Consolidative with pleural effusions Tb A
22 BAL F (71) HIV Fever, cough Pleural effusions Tb H
23 Soft tissue biopsy M (45) Healthy - - ND B
24 Oral ulcers M (32) Pamphlgus Oral ulcers - ND D
25 Blood F (47) HIV Fever ND ND F
28 BAL F (72) Recurrent CMV, HIV Fever, cough Cavitation Tb B
29 BAL F (71) Healthy Fever, cough Infiltrates Tb B
30 Sputum and BAL M (42) HIV Fever, general weakness and dysuria Infiltrates Tb H
31 BAL F (65) Kidney transplant recipient Fever, cough Diffuse pneumonic infiltrates Tb A
32 Brain abscess M (32) Brain abscess FUO NA Nocardiosis C
35 Leg discharges (2) M (49) DM Swelling left leg, purulent wound discharge ND Mycetoma L
39 BAL F (67) Tb Fever, cough Cavitation Tb G
40 BAL F (31) Healthy Fever, chest pain, cough Nodule Tb L
41 Blood M(66) Mitral valve prosthesis Post operative fatigue, chest pain ND ND I
42 BAL F (81) Neo Fever, chest pain, cough Infiltrate Tb A
43 Sputum (3) M (62) Ischemic heart disease Fever, cough Small irregular nodular lesions Tb H
47 BAL M (67) Chronic bronchitis Fever, cough Diffuse pneumonic infiltrates Tb J
48 BAL M (59) Chronic bronchitis Fever, cough Diffuse pneumonic infiltrates Tb C
49 Sputum, BAL M (42) Follicular non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Dyspnea, cough Bilateral involvement Tb H
50 Brain abscess M (59) Brain abscess FUO, weight loss, headache CT scan, cerebral abscess Nocardiosis J
51 BAL F (47) Healthy Fever, chest pain, weight loss Cavitation Tb H
52 BAL F (55) Healthy Fever, chest pain, cough Nodule Tb E
53 Biopsy F (18) Skin graft recipient Weakness, soft tissue abscess NA Nocardiosis D
54 Biopsy F (28) Soft tissue abscess Subcutaneous nodules ND Mycetoma I
55 BAL F (81) Tb Fever, cough Cavitation Tb B
56 Blood M (32) Liver transplant recipient FUO ND ND L
68 Brain abscess F (64) Brain abscess FUO, weight loss, headache CT scan, cerebral abscess Nocardiosis L
71 Sputum (3) F (64) Tb, HIV Fever, cough Cavitation Tb L
77 Brain abscess F (50) Multifocal brain abscesses FUO, headache CT scan, cerebral abscess Nocardiosis B
78 Sputum M (88) Neo Chest pain Cavitation Tb H
79 Bone marrow biopsy M (14) Hemophili Fever, Dyspnea, cough ND Tb K
84 BAL F (73) Neo Fever, chest pain, weight loss Infiltrate Tb B
90 Sputum (4) M (48) Neo Fever, cough, chest pain Cavitation Tb C
SM25 BAL M (63) Liver transplant recipient Fever, cough Small irregular nodular lesions Tb J
SM26 BAL F (42) Tb, HIV General weakness, dysuria Cavitation Tb L
SM30 BAL F (21) Follicular non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Fever , cough Diffuse pneumonic infiltrates Tb H
SM62 Blood F (46) Kidney transplant recipient FUO ND ND H
SM80 BAL F (73) Neo Fever, chest pain, weight loss Infiltrate Tb B
SM84 BAL F (40) Neo Fever, chest pain, weight loss Infiltrate Tb B

Abbreviations: G/A, gender/age; PMH, past medical history; F, female, ND, not determined; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; M, Male; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; NA, not available; BMT, bone marrow transplantation; CMV, cytomegalovirus, FUO, fever unknown origin, DM, diabetes mellitus; Tb, tuberculosis; Neo, neoplasia, CT, computed tomography.

*

ITS sequevars from A to G has been reported previously (9) and H to L reports as new genotypes base of ITS sequences.

Identification of isolates by phenotypic tests

Isolates were initially screened using conventional phenotypic tests including standard morphological and biochemical assays previously established for identification of mycobacteria (20).

DNA extraction and purification

Chromosomal DNA was extracted using a method of Pitcher et al. (21) with a slight modification to facilitate the susceptibility of cells to the standard digestion. In brief, after thermal inactivation, a pretreatment of biomass with lipase (Type VII; final concentration, 2 mg/ml [Sigma]) and a further treatment with proteinase K (100 pg/ml) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (final concentration, 0.5% [wt/vol]) were applied. The DNA was purified by phenol chloroform-isoamyl alcohol and precipitated with isopropanol. The precipitate was washed in 70% ethanol, dehydrated and dissolved in 100 μl of Milli-Q water and stored at -20°C freezer until use.

Identification of isolates to species level

The identity of the isolates as M. fortuitum was confirmed by PCR restriction fragment length polymorphisem analysis (PRA) of 441 base pairs region of the 65-kDa heat shock protein gene (hsp65) by two restriction endonuclease including BstEII and HaeIII as described previously (16). Representative isolates (randomly selected strains) from each genotype based on ITS region further identified by 16S rRNA sequencing (8).

ITS gene sequencing

All M. fortuitum clinical isolates were subjected to the ITS region amplification and sequencing following the procedures described herein (22). Amplification of the full ITS segment was performed with primers L (5’- GCTGGATCACCTCCTTCT-3’) from conserved sequence at the 3’ end of the 16S rRNA (from position 1525 to position 1543 on the Escherichia coli 16S rRNA) and R (5’- CTGGTGCCAAGGCATCCA-3’) which deduced from conserved sequence of 23S rRNA 5’ sequences (position 23 to position 40 on the E. coli 23S rRNA). Mixture reaction (50μl) containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM (each) deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dATP, dGTP, dCTP, and dUTP), 10 pmol of each primer, 0.5U of Taq DNA polymerase, and 5 μl (50 ng) of extracted DNA using recommended thermal profile. The purified PCR products were directly sequenced with the forward 16S-1511f and reverse 23S-23r primers using an ABI 3100 genetic analyzer and a BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit by SEQLAB Company (Germany).

Data analysis of ITS gene sequences

The obtained sequences of ITS region of each strain were aligned with the published ITS region sequences of M. fortuitum type strains and clinical strains (retrieved from GenBank™ database) using the jPhydit software package according to primary-structure (23). Comparative analyses of ITS region was performed with distance matrix, maximum-parsimony, and maximum-likelihood methods as implemented in the Mega4 program (24). Tree topologies was tested by bootstrap analysis on 1000 resampling.

The GenBank accession numbers of ITS sequences of clinical isolates of M. fortuitum determined in this work are as follows: KF366424 - KF366435.

RESULTS

Based on growth characteristics, 48 isolates were rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM). The isolates were initially classified into Runyon’s groups IV (20) and further identified by hsp65-PRA method as M. fortuitum (Table 1).

Analysis of the hsp65 gene by PRA (PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis) (explain PRA for first time) demonstrated identical electrophoretic patterns from clinical isolates (BstEII pattern 235/120/85 and HaeIII pattern 145/120/60/55) to that M. fortuitum pattern (http://app.chuv.ch/prasite). Randomly selected strains from each genotypes of ITS region, identified as M. fortuitum species by 16S rRNA sequence analysis.

PCR amplification of the ITS region with the primers L and R resulted in detection of a single band of approximately 380 bp. No variation in product length was considerable between strains.

Twelve different sequence types (sequevar) were identified based on ITS region. Of these 7 had been previously described and these include MfoA, MfoB, MfoC, MfoD, MfoE, MfoF and MfoG identified (11) but five novel sequevars designated as MfoH, MfoI, MfoJ, MfoK and MfoL were identified among different Iranian clinical strains of M. fortuitum. These novel sequevar were distinct from the first group.

Pairwise comparisons between the previously reported sequevar and clinical isolates displayed higher sequence variation between M. fortuitum strains. A dendrogram based on maximum parsimony analysis reflecting the ITS sequence-based clustering of all test strains of M. fortuitum is shown in Fig. 1. Within the consensus tree, twelve clusters with distinct branches among the M. fortuitum reference strains could be defined.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Distance matrix tree showing the divergence of ITS sequences of the Iranaian clinical isolates of M. fortuitum. All alignment positions which are occupied by residues were used for the calculation of binary distance values. The topology of the tree was evaluated and corrected according to the results of maximum-parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses. The bar represents 0.1 estimated sequence divergence.

Of 48 test strains, 25 (52%) grouped and formed distinct clusters with previously reported sequevars (11). The branches was supported with highest bootstrap value (100%) (Fig 1).

Among previously reported sequevars, MfoB (8 isolates, 16.8%) was the most frequently encountered, followed by MfoA (6 isolates, 12.5%) and MfoC (4 isolates, 8.3%). Two isolates (4%) belong to each sequevars MfoD (Mf 24, Mf 53), MfoE (Mf 11, Mf 52) and MfoF (Mf 9, Mf 25) were identified. One isolate (Mf 39), showed identical ITS sequence, to that of reported for MfoG.

Of 48 test strains, 23 (48%), represented novel sequevars and took five well-supported and distinct positions on the ITS tree (Fig. 1). Among the new sequevars reported in this study, MfoH (9 isolates, 18.7%) was the most frequently encountered followed by MfoL (6 isolates, 12.5%), MfoJ and MfoK (4 isolates, 8.3%) and MfoI (2 isolates, 4%).

Twenty-eight isolates (58%) were recovered from the patients with pulmonary disease (Table 1). However, the significant association between M. fortuitum sequevars and pulmonary disease was not detected.

DISCUSSION

The main aim of this study was to access genetic diversity of M. fortuitum clinical isolates using ITS sequence analysis. Due to high polymorphism, ITS region has been reported as alternative target for molecular identification of mycobacteria to species level (11, 12, 18). ITS region also showed potential utility for strain differentiation among some species of mycobacteria (11, 12, 17). Some studies have reported a correlation of the genomic variants and particular host range in mycobacteria, indicating the usefulness of genetic markers including ITS, IS901, major polymorphic tandem repeat (MPTR) and hsp65 in the subspecies differentiation (11, 12, 16-18, 22, 25, 26). For example, Stout et al. (2008), found a significant association between M. avium sequence types of ITS region and M. avium pulmonary disease (27).

Different variant of M. fortuitum also had been characterized by hsp65-PRA or other genetic marker (11, 12, 14-16) but relevance and clinical importance of these genotypes have been poorly studied. M. fortuitum is most frequently encounterd species of NTM that usually implicated in chronic infectious diseases caused by mycobacteria in the Iranian clinical settings (28). Different sequevars reported here, were recovered from wide types of clinical samples including BAL, Blood, Bone marrow biopsy, brain abscess, leg abscess, oral ulcers, sputum and wound infection.

This study demonstrates that the ITS of the M. fortuitum exhibits high variations, base substitutions and insertion or deletion. Present study suggests that higher degree of variation at ITS region is valuable for discriminating of clinical strains of M. fortuitum. However, no association was found between any particular sequence types and case status.

In conclusion, the ITS region of the genus Mycobacterium exhibits a high variation which is discriminative for related taxa. The marker has sufficient power to differentiate and separate clinical strains of M. fortuitum. This study showed that the ITS region possesses high discriminatory power between the clinical isolates up to the clonal level. The results also suggest the possibility of the existence of predominant clone of M. fortuitum in affected patients in Iran. The data also point to the conclusion that a large variety of M. fortuitum clone can produce human disease although certain clones seem to be predominant.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Voice Canceller of Research and Technology Development of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran (Grant number: 90124). The current study has been approved by the ethical committee of Vice Canceller of Research and Technology Development of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Katoch VM. Infections due to non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) Indian J Med Res. 2004;120:290–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Patel JB, Leonard DG, Pan X, Musser JM, Berman RE, Nachamkin I. Sequence-based identification of Mycobacterium species using the MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA bacterial identification system. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:246–251. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.1.246-251.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lebrun L, Espinasse F, Poveda JD, Vincent-Levy-Frebault V. Evaluation of nonradioactive DNA probes for identification of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:2476–2478. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.9.2476-2478.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.De Beenhouwer H, Liang Z, De Rijk P, Van Eekeren C, Portaels F. Detection and identification of mycobacteria by DNA amplification and oligonucleotide-specific capture plate hybridization. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2994–2998. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.11.2994-2998.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tortoli E, Nanetti A, Piersimoni C, Cichero P, Farina C, Mucignat G, Scarparo C, et al. Performance assessment of new multiplex probe assay for identification of mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:1079–1084. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.3.1079-1084.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kim H, Kim SH, Shim TS, Kim MN, Bai GH, Park YG, Lee SH, et al. PCR restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (PRA)-algorithm targeting 644 bp Heat Shock Protein 65 (hsp65) gene for differentiation of Mycobacterium spp. J Microbiol Methods. 2005;62:199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lee H, Park HJ, Cho SN, Bai GH, Kim SJ. Species identification of mycobacteria by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism of the rpoB gene. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2966–2971. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.8.2966-2971.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rogall T, Wolters J, Flohr T, Böttger EC. Towards a phylogeny and definition of species at the molecular level within the genus Mycobacterium . Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1990;40:323–330. doi: 10.1099/00207713-40-4-323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schinsky MF, Morey RE, Steigerwalt AG, Douglas MP, Wilson RW, Floyd MM, Butler WR, et al. Taxonomic variation in the Mycobacterium fortuitum third biovariant complex: description of Mycobacterium boenickei sp.nov., Mycobacterium houstonense sp. nov., Mycobacterium neworleansense sp. nov. and Mycobacterium brisbanense sp. nov. and recognition of Mycobacterium porcinum from human clinical isolates. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54:1653–1667. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02743-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tortoli E. Impact of genotypic studies on mycobacterial taxonomy: the new mycobacteria of the 1990s. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16:319–354. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.2.319-354.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roth A, Fischer M, Hamid ME, Michalke S, Ludwig W, Mauch H. Differentiation of phylogenetically related slowly growing mycobacteria based on 16S-23S rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer sequences. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:139–147. doi: 10.1128/jcm.36.1.139-147.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Roth A, Reischl U, Streubel A, Naumann L, Kroppenstedt RM, Habicht M, Fischer M, Mauch H. Novel diagnostic algorithm for identification of mycobacteria using genus-specific amplification of the 16S-23S rRNA gene spacer and restriction endonucleases. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1094–1104. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.3.1094-1104.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Silcox VA, Good RC, Floyd MM. Identification of clinically significant Mycobacterium fortuitum complex isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1981;14:686–691. doi: 10.1128/jcm.14.6.686-691.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Legrand E, Radegonde N, Goh KS, Rastogi N. A pulsed-field gel electrophoresis study of Mycobacterium fortuitum in a Caribbean setting underlines high genetic diversity of the strains and excludes nosocomial outbreaks. Int J Med Microbiol. 2002;292:51–57. doi: 10.1078/1438-4221-00187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sampaio JL, Chimara E, Ferrazoli L, da Silva Telles MA, Del Guercio VM, Jericó ZV, et al. Application of four molecular typing methods for analysis of Mycobacterium fortuitum group strains causing post-mammaplasty infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12:142–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01312.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Telenti A, Marchesi F, Balz M, Bally F, Böttger EC, Bodmer T. Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:175–178. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.2.175-178.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Portaeles F, de Rijk P, Jannes G. The 16S-23S rRNA spacer, a useful tool for taxonomical and epidemiological studies of the M. chelonae complex. Tubercle Lung Dis. 1996;77:17–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Frothingham R, Wilson KH. Molecular phylogeny of the Mycobacterium avium complex demonstrates clinically meaningful divisions. J Infect Dis. 1994;169:305–12. doi: 10.1093/infdis/169.2.305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, Holland SM, et al. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;15(175):367–416. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200604-571ST. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kent P T, Kubica G P. Public health mycobacteriology: a guide for the level III laboratory. Centers for Disease Control, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Atlanta, Ga: 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pitcher D G, Saunders N A, Owen R J. Rapid extraction of bacterial genomic DNA with guanidium thiocyanate. Lett Appl Microbio. 1989;l8:151–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Leblond-Bourget N, Philippe H, Mangin I, Decaris B. 16S rRNA and 16S to 23S internal transcribed spacer sequence analyses reveal inter- and intraspecific Bifidobacterium phylogeny. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996;46:102–11. doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-1-102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jeon YS, Chung H, Park S, Hur I, Lee JH, Chun J. jPHYDIT: a JAVA-based integrated environment for molecular phylogeny of ribosomal RNA sequences. Bioinformatics. 2005;15(21):3171–3173. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1596–1599. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pavlik I, Svastova P, Bartl J, Dvorska L, Rychlik I. Relationship between IS901 in the Mycobacterium avium complex strains isolated from birds, animals, humans, and the environment and virulence for poultry. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000;7:212–217. doi: 10.1128/cdli.7.2.212-217.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Picardeau M, Prod’Hom G, Raskine L, LePennec MP, Vincent V. Genotypic characterization of five subspecies of Mycobacterium kansasii . J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:25–32. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.1.25-32.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Stout JE, Hopkins GW, McDonald JR, Quinn A, Hamilton CD, Reller LB, Frothingham R. Association between 16S-23S internal transcribed spacer sequence groups of Mycobacterium avium complex and pulmonary disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:2790–2793. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00719-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shojaei H, Heidarieh P, Hashemi A, Feizabadi MM, Daei Naser A. Species identification of neglected nontuberculous mycobacteria in developing country. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2011;64:265–271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES