Abstract
A strategy for the diversification of triazolium-based catalysts is presented. This method is based on the reduction to the triazoline, which serves as a suitable and stable substrate for Pd-mediated cross-coupling, followed by trityl cation mediated reoxidation to the triazolium.
Keywords: NHC Catalysis, Organocatalysis, asymmetric catalysis
Organocatalysis with N-Heterocyclic carbenes (NHC’s) has emerged as an important field in synthetic organic chemistry.1 The ability to impart nucleophilic character to aldehydes is one of the key features of these catalysts. This reversal of polarity, often called umpolung,2 has led to the discovery of many new reactions.3 While many NHC precatalysts have been reported, triazoliums have gained significant attention.4 Our group has contributed to this field with the introduction of new catalysts that have been effective in a variety of reactions (Figure 1).5 One important aspect to the success of triazolium based systems is their highly modular synthesis. These catalysts are often formed from the condensation of an amide, hydrazine, and an orthoformate, each of which may be tuned in an effort to achieve improved utility.6
Figure 1.

Representative Triazolium Pre-catalysts
Given the importance of structural diversification and substitution on the success of a given catalytic transformation,7 access to a wide variety of catalyst structures is crucial. However, syntheses of numerous catalysts can be time-consuming and inefficient. A strategy to overcome this obstacle is late-stage modification of the catalyst. This allows for the rapid formation of a library of new catalysts.8 Waser and coworkers accomplished this strategy by revealing a primary amine tethered to a triazolium catalyst (Scheme 1, eqn 1).9 This synthetic handle enabled the installation of a thiourea side chain, producing bifunctional catalysts. Bode and coworkers also used a similar amine as a point for manipulation (Scheme 1, eqn 2),10 and installed a variety of pyrroles providing an array of new catalysts.
Scheme 1.
Previous Strategies for Late-Stage Manipulation
Triazoliums based on the cis-aminoindanol backbone (such as 2) have emerged as a dominant scaffold for NHC catalysis. Unfortunately, there remain few reports of modification of this backbone.11 A late-stage manipulation strategy could allow quick access to new analogs of this catalyst. We were inspired by work of Bode and coworkers, who reported the selective bromination of the amide precursor. We envision that a halo-indanol adduct, accessible via a selective bromination,12 would serve as a suitable substrate in a Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reactions.13 A potential issue with this approach is the basic conditions required for this transformation, which can deprotonate the triazolium to form the reactive carbene. Indeed, attempting the cross-coupling on the triazolium gave no desired product, leading only to decomposition of the starting materials.14
Reduction under mild sodium borohydride conditions easily affords triazolines. These triazolines should be stable to basic conditions, allowing for many kinds of reactions to take place. Concurrent with our own work, Plenio and coworkers recently disclosed the same strategy for the late stage modification of imidazolinium-based catalysts (Scheme 2, eqn 3).15
Scheme 2.

Triazolines as substrates for cross-coupling
With easy access to the bromo-triazoline 4, we investigated the feasibility of a Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling. After finding optimal conditions, we applied this method to elaborate the brominated aminoindanol scaffold (Table 1). Electron-rich arylboronic acids are quite effective as coupling partners. However, more electron-deficient aryl groups result in slightly diminished yields. Sterically hindered systems, such as mesityl or ortho-bromo, do not provide any desired products.
Table 1.
Suzuki-Miyaura Cross-coupling
|
Reaction conditions: Triazoline 4 (1 equiv.), Boronic acid (1.5 equiv.), Potassium Phosphate (2 equiv.) Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (5 mol %), THF/H2O (3:1), heated to 60°C
After successful derivatization of 4, we explored conditions to reoxidize to the triazolium salt. For inspiration, we turned to work published by Bildstein and coworkers.16 While Plenio employed NBS as the oxidant, Bildstein described the oxidation of benzimidazolines with a trityl (triphenylmethyl) salt. While similar, there have been no reports of this transformation with the more electron-deficient triazolines. In the event, this strategy proved effective. Treatment of a triazoline with an equivalent of Ph3C•BF4 in dichloromethane provides complete conversion to the triazolium salt (Table 2). Precipitation by diethyl ether delivers the compound as a clean powder.
Table 2.
Oxidation of Elaborated Triazolines
|
With a method in hand to reoxidize with trityl salts, we explored the potential of this approach to introduce new counterions beyond tetrafluoroborate. This route allows introduction of hexafluorophosphate, hexachloroantimonate, and perchlorate counterions. In terms of substrate, both electron-deficient and electron-rich triazolines can be oxidized by this method. Bulky, chiral triazolines are also tolerated in this reaction. Trityl chloride fails to provide product, most likely due to its covalent C-Cl bond. While isolated yields are presented, these reactions are high yielding when monitored by NMR. The ease of precipitation makes for a useful synthesis.
While this methodology facilitates the rapid access of several diverse triazolium pre-catalysts, we were concerned the increased steric bulk of the catalyst could prove detrimental to reactivity. To test this, we employed these catalysts in an asymmetric intramolecular Stetter reaction.5 These catalysts work in high efficiency while maintaining excellent enantioselectivity.17
In summary, we present a strategy for the late-stage diversification of triazoliums. Key to this route is a cross-coupling of the triazoline intermediate, which remains stable to basic conditions. Oxidation back to the triazolium salt is easily accomplished by treatment with trityl salts. Substitution of the aminoindanol scaffold does not impede reactivity compared to the native catalyst.
Supplementary Material
Table 3.
Oxidation with Trityl Salts
|
Table 4.
Intramolecular Stetter
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHC: | yield (%) | ee (%) | NHC: | yield (%) | ee (%) |
| 2 | 99 | 96 | 6d | 99 | 94 |
| 6a | 99 | 96 | 6e | 99 | 92 |
| 6b | 99 | 95 | 6f | 99 | 95 |
| 6c | 99 | 95 | 6g | 99 | 93 |
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the NIGMS (GM72586) for generous support and Donald Gauthier (Merck) for a generous gift of aminoindanol. KEO thanks the NIH for a Ruth Kirschstein predoctoral fellowship (GM096749).
References and Notes
- 1.For reviews, see: Enders D, Niemeier O, Hensler A. Chem Rev. 2007;107:5606–5655. doi: 10.1021/cr068372z.Nair V, Vellalath S, Babu BP. Chem Soc Rev. 2008;37:2691. doi: 10.1039/b719083m.Moore JL, Rovis T. Top Curr Chem. 2010;291:77. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-02815-1_18.Nair V, Menon RS, Biju AT, Sinu CR, Paul RR, Jose A, Sreekumar V. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:5336. doi: 10.1039/c1cs15139h.Vora HU, Wheeler P, Rovis T. Adv Synth Catal. 2012;354:1617. doi: 10.1002/adsc.201200031.Bugaut X, Glorius F. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41:3511. doi: 10.1039/c2cs15333e.Studer A, De Sarkar S, Biswas A, Samanta RC. Chem Eur J. 2013;19:4664. doi: 10.1002/chem.201203707.Hopkinson MN, Richter C, Schedler M, Glorius F. Nature. 2014;510:485. doi: 10.1038/nature13384.
- 2.Seebach D. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1979;18:239. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Some recent advances include: Fu Z, Xu J, Zhu T, Leong WWY, Chi YR. Nat Chem. 2013;5:835. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1710.White NA, DiRocco DA, Rovis T. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:8504. doi: 10.1021/ja403847e.Cheng J, Huang Z, Chi YR. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:8592. doi: 10.1002/anie.201303247.
- 4.Rovis T. Chem Lett. 2008;37:2. [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) Kerr MS, Read de Alaniz J, Rovis T. J Am Chem Soc. 2002;124:10298. doi: 10.1021/ja027411v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Read de Alaniz J, Kerr MS, Moore JL, Rovis T. J Org Chem. 2008;73:2033. doi: 10.1021/jo702313f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) DiRocco DA, Oberg KM, Dalton DM, Rovis T. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:10872. doi: 10.1021/ja904375q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Vora HU, Lathrop SP, Reynolds NT, Kerr MS, Read de Alaniz J, Rovis T. Org Synth. 2010;87:350. [Google Scholar]; (b) Benhamou L, Chardon E, Lavigne G, Bellemin-Laponnaz S, César V. Chem Rev. 2011;111:2705. doi: 10.1021/cr100328e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Kerr MS, Read de Alaniz J, Rovis T. J Org Chem. 2005;70:5725. doi: 10.1021/jo050645n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.See ref. 4. Also see: Mahatthananchai J, Bode JW. Chem Sci. 2012;3:192. doi: 10.1039/C1SC00397F.
- 8.For a superb example, see: Neel AJ, Hehn JP, Tripet PF, Toste FD. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:14044. doi: 10.1021/ja407410b.
- 9.Brand JP, Osuna Siles JI, Waser J. Synlett. 2010:881. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zheng P, Gondo CA, Bode JW. Chem Asian J. 2011;6:614. doi: 10.1002/asia.201000617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) Kobayashi T, Tanaka K, Miwa J, Katsumura S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2004;15:185. [Google Scholar]; (b) Liu SY, Katsumura S. Chin Chem Lett. 2009;20:1204. [Google Scholar]; (c) Kobayashi T, Hasegawa F, Hirose Y, Tanaka K, Mori H, Katsumura S. J Org Chem. 2012;77:1812. doi: 10.1021/jo202350z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Kuwano S, Harada S, Kang B, Oriez R, Yamaoka Y, Takasu K, Yamada K. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:11485. doi: 10.1021/ja4055838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hsieh SY, Binanzer M, Kreituss I, Bode JW. Chem Commun. 2012;48:8892. doi: 10.1039/c2cc34907h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.(a) Miyaura N, Suzuki A. Chem Rev. 1995;95:2457. [Google Scholar]; (b) Martin R, Buchwald SL. Acc Chem Res. 2008;41:1461. doi: 10.1021/ar800036s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.There are several decomposition pathways available to NHC catalysts; for a report, see: Zhao X, Glover GS, Oberg KM, Dalton DM, Rovis T. Synlett. 2013:1229. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1338842.
- 15.Egert M, Walther S, Plenio H. Eur J Org Chem. 2014:4362. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bildstein B, Malaun M, Kopacka H, Ongania KH, Wurst K. J Organomet Chem. 1999;572:177. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Typical Experimental Procedure: Synthesis of 5a is as follows: In a glove box, a dry 2-dram glass vial is loaded with PdCl2(PPh3)2 (7 mg, 0.01 mmol, 0.05 equiv.). The vial is sealed and removed from the glove box. To this vial is added triazoline (100 mg, 0.22 mmol, 1 equiv.), phenylboronic acid (0.32 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) and potassium phosphate tribasic (93 mg, 0.44 mmol, 2 equiv.). Dry THF (1.5 mL) is added followed by water (0.5 mL), as well as a magnetic stir bar. The vial is sealed, secured with Teflon tape, and heated by oil bath at 60 °C for 6 h. Reaction is deemed complete by TLC. The reaction is cooled to rt and 1 mL of brine and 1 mL of EtOAc is added to the reaction. The aqueous fraction is removed, and the organic layer is dried over MgSO4. The crude reaction product is filtered and concentrated. The crude product is purified by flash column chromatography, eluting with 0 to 50% EtOAc/Hexanes through basic alumina. 60 mg of dark brown solid was isolated (60% yield). rf = 0.5 (50% EtOAc/Hexane). 1H-NMR (300 MHz; acetone-d6): δ 7.70-7.60 (m, 4H), 7.47-7.35 (m, 4H), 5.68-5.67 (m, 1H), 5.04 (t, J = 1.1 Hz, 1H), 4.78 (dd, J = 5.6, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 4.64-4.55 (m, 2H), 4.47 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1H), 3.30-3.28 (m, 2H). 13C-NMR (101 MHz; acetone-d6): δ 149.0, 141.6, 140.9, 140.3, 139.6, 129.82, 129.73, 128.49, 128.44, 128.38, 127.8, 127.25, 127.18, 127.16, 126.8, 125.6, 123.8, 123.2, 77.1, 73.6, 62.3, 59.2, 34.8. MS calcd for C24H16F5N3O: 457.4, found 458.1 (M+H). IR: (neat) 2914, 1626, 1504, 1479, 1429, 1340, 1307, 1055, 1039, 977 cm−1. [α]D23 = −39.17 (c = 2.4, acetone).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

