Skip to main content
ChemistryOpen logoLink to ChemistryOpen
. 2014 Dec 10;4(2):107–110. doi: 10.1002/open.201402082

Chemoselective Oxidation of Benzyl, Amino, and Propargyl Alcohols to Aldehydes and Ketones under Mild Reaction Conditions

C B Rajashekar Reddy a, Sabbasani Rajasekhara Reddy a,*, Shivaji Naidu a
PMCID: PMC4420580  PMID: 25969806

Abstract

Catalytic oxidation reactions often suffer from drawbacks such as low yields and poor selectivity. Particularly, selective oxidation of alcohols becomes more difficult when a compound contains more than one oxidizable functional group. In order to deliver a methodology that addresses these issues, herein we report an efficient, aerobic, chemoselective and simplified approach to oxidize a broad range of benzyl and propargyl alcohols containing diverse functional groups to their corresponding aldehydes and ketones in excellent yields under mild reaction conditions. Optimal yields were obtained at room temperature using 1 mmol substrate, 10 mol % copper(I) iodide, 10 mol % 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), and 1 mol % 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine 1-oxyl (TEMPO) in acetonitrile, under an oxygen balloon. The catalytic system can be applied even when sensitive and oxidizable groups such as alkynes, amines, and phenols are present; starting materials and products containing such groups were found to be stable under the developed conditions.

Keywords: aldehydes, benzyl alcohols, copper(I) catalyst, ketones, oxidation, propargyl alcohols


Developing chemoselective and sustainable catalytic oxidation methods is important due to their significance in both academe and industry (e.g., to make chemical intermediates for the pharmaceutical, perfume, dye, and agrochemical industries).1 In order to achieve this, various stoichiometric and catalytic methods were developed using chromium, manganese, ruthenium, osmium, palladium, platinum, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, activated DMSO,2 hypervalent iodine reagents,3 metal-free systems,4 and other reagents.5 Among these reagents, copper is an essential metal that can easily associate with different functional groups via Lewis acid interactions or π-coordination.6d Significant efforts towards the chemoselective oxidation of alcohols using various copper-catalyzed and copper—2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine 1-oxyl (TEMPO)-catalyzed systems have been made.1a, 6, 7 Recently, chemoselective aerobic oxidation of amino alcohols to carbonyl compounds using 2-azaadamantane-N-oxyl (AZADO)/copper complex was reported.8 While the reported methods are synthetically useful, they do possess some limitations like commercial nonavailability of reagents and high operating costs caused by the reaction conditions required, which make them inconvenient and undesirable.9 Synthesizing amino carbonyl derivatives from their respective amino alcohols remains a big challenge to the synthetic chemist because protection and deprotection steps have to be used when other oxidizable groups are present within the same molecule.10 The fact might be that interactions between the electron-rich amino groups and the oxidant lead to formation of the desired product in poor yield.

α,β-Acetylenic carbonyl compounds are highly important precursors for the construction of various bioactive heterocyclic compounds and DNA-cleavage agents, and have a wide range of applications in medicinal chemistry.11 Various methods in literature exist for the oxidation of propargyl alcohols to carbonyl compounds. These include stoichiometric oxidation systems, such as 2-iodoxybenzoic acid and sodium periodate,12 transition-metal-catalyzed oxidation reactions, such as with copper(II), ruthenium(II), iron(III) nitrate nonahydrate, vanadyl acetylacetonate,13 copper(II) acetylacetonate–N-hydroxyphthalimide (NHPI),14 and copper nanoparticles,15 and TEMPO/calcium hypochlorite.16a Although the developed methods are useful, they do have some limitations such as the instability of the produced carbonyl compounds in the reaction system, catalyst deactivation by the formation of metallic polymers, formation of stable complexes between metal salts and some electron donors on the starting alcohols,16b and use of stoichiometric oxidants.16a, 17a–17b Therefore, it is highly important to develop a more desirable reagent for chemoselective oxidation that works under simple and mild reaction conditions and does not affect other oxidizable functional groups (e.g., amino, alkyne, hydroxy, etc.).

Our research interest is on oxidation catalysis, where we develop mild and widely applicable selective oxidation methods.17 Our recent and ongoing efforts towards the synthesis of azo compounds and hydrazines use a copper(I) bromide/azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN)/4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) catalytic system via dehyrogenative coupling of aromatic amines under mild reaction conditions.17c During our studies on the selective oxidation of 2-aminobenzyl alcohol, surprisingly, we could notice only 2-amino benzaldehyde in 42 % yield instead of the azo compound [(E)-(diazene-1,2-diylbis(2,1-phenylene) dimethanol] under the reported reaction conditions (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Copper(I)-catalyzed oxidation of (2-aminophenyl)methanol. Reagents and conditions: a) CuBr, AIBN, O2, DMAP, CH3CN, rt, 12 h, 42 % (aldehyde).

This observation prompted us to further investigate the chemoselective oxidation of amino, propargyl, and a wide range of diversely functionalized benzyl alcohols. We herein report an oxidation reaction that can be performed under very mild conditions (room temperature) in the presence of commercially available DMAP as the ligand with a copper(I) iodide/TEMPO catalyst system, without use of an external base, where molecular oxygen acts as a stoichiometric oxidant, and where water is the only byproduct.

Preliminary experiments were carried out using 2-aminobenzyl alcohol as model substrate. The first set of experiments was examined using copper(I) bromide as standard catalyst while changing the amount of AIBN and TEMPO. In the copper(I) bromide/DMAP/AIBN system, the maximum yield obtained was 42 % (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). By increasing the reaction temperatures to 60 and 80 °C, the reaction was not selective, and unidentified products were formed in the reaction mixture along with the desired product. Next, AIBN was replaced with TEMPO, and varying the amounts of TEMPO and DMAP resulted in an increase in yield to 85 % in 12 h (Table 1, entry 5). The second set of experiments was performed under similar conditions using copper(I) chloride, which resulted in a 76 % yield of desired product (Table 1, entry 6). The third set of experiments was examined by using copper(I) iodide in place of copper(I) bromide and copper(I) chloride and varying the amount of DMAP and TEMPO (Table 1, entries 7–11).

Table 1.

Optimizing conditions for Aerobic oxidation of o-aminobenzyl alcohol.[a]

Inline graphic
Entry CuX DMAP [mol %] AIBN [mol %] TEMPO [mol %] Temp Time [h] Yield [%]
1 CuBr 120 30 rt 12 42
2 CuBr 120 100 rt 12 42
3 CuBr 120 10 rt 12 78
4 CuBr 120 5 rt 12 78
5 CuBr 20 5 rt 12 85
6 CuCl 20 5 rt 12 76
7 CuI 20 5 rt 3 87
8 CuI 20 1 rt 3 88
9 CuI 10 1 60–65 °C 3 88
10 CuI 1 rt 12 -
11 CuI 10 1 rt 3 88

a] Reagents and conditions: substrate (1 mmol), Cu catalyst (10 mol %), CH3CN (3 mL) under O2 balloon.

Among the copper(I) halides, copper(I) iodide was the most effective (Table 1). The maximum isolated yield of 88 % was observed in the reaction lasting 3 h with copper(I) iodide (10 mol %,), DMAP (10 mol %), and TEMPO (1 mol %) (Table 1, Entry 11). Interestingly, in the presence of copper(I) iodide and TEMPO without using DMAP, no reaction takes place under optimized conditions (Table 1, entry 10).

Next, the scope of this oxidation system was extended to various substituted 2-aminobenzyl alcohols to produce a series of amino aldehydes under the developed reaction conditions (Table 2). Next experiments were carried out with electron rich (2-amino-5-methylphenyl)methanol (2 a, Table 2). The reaction progressed smoothly and gave the corresponding aldehyde 2 b in excellent yield (Table 2). Furthermore, aminobenzyl alcohols bearing a halogen substitution (3 a8 a, Table 2) were converted into their respective carbonyl derivatives (3 b8 b, Table 2) in good to excellent yields. When the chloro group was in ortho-position to the benzyl alcohol, the resultant aldehyde was obtained in 65 % yield due to the ortho effect of chlorine. Notably, no overoxidized products, like carboxylic acids or other N-oxidized byproducts, were observed. In addition to the selective oxidation of aminobenzyl alcohols to aldehydes, the developed protocol was extended to various hydroxy-, nitro-, and methoxy-substituted benzyl alcohols (9 a13 a, Table 2). As anticipated, substrates containing ortho-hydroxy and para-hydroxy groups, that is, 4-(hydroxymethyl)phenol (9 a) and 2-(hydroxymethyl)phenol (10 a), were selectively converted into their respective aldehydes in excellent yields (9 b and 10 b, Table 2). Notably, benzyl alcohols with deactivating ortho- and para-nitro groups or an activating para-methoxy group were converted to their respective aldehydes in excellent yields (11 b, 12 b, and 13 b, Table 2).

Table 2.

Selective oxidation of benzyl and aminobenzyl alcohols.[a]

Inline graphic
Entry Substrate Time [h] Product Yield[b] [%]
1 Inline graphic 6 Inline graphic 86
2 Inline graphic 6 Inline graphic 85
3 Inline graphic 14 Inline graphic 84
4 Inline graphic 6 Inline graphic 84
5 Inline graphic 12 Inline graphic 65
6 Inline graphic 6 Inline graphic 81
7 Inline graphic 16 Inline graphic 80
8 Inline graphic 3 Inline graphic 92
9 Inline graphic 6 Inline graphic 90
10 Inline graphic 1.5 Inline graphic 92
11 Inline graphic 1.5 Inline graphic 92
12 Inline graphic 3 Inline graphic 91

[a] Reagents and conditions: substrate (1 mmol), CuI (10 mol %), DMAP (10 mol %), and TEMPO (1 mol % ) in CH3CN (5 mL) under O2 balloon at rt; reaction time as mentioned in the table. [b] Isolated yield after column chromatography.

Finally, the scope of this oxidation system was extended to propargyl alcohols to produce their respective aldehydes and ketones. Our initial experiments were carried out without any substituent on the phenyl moiety, that is, 3-phenylprop-2-yn-1-ol (14 a, Table 3), which was successfully converted to the desired aldehyde 14 b with excellent yield. Here starting materials of fluorine and pyridine-containing propargyl alcohols were synthesized according to reported methods.18 The synthesized propargyl alcohols were efficiently converted to their respective aldehydes in excellent yields. In addition, the developed protocol was extended to the oxidation of secondary propargyl alcohols (17 a–20 a, Table 3). Significantly, secondary alcohols with both electron-donating (hydrogen and methyl) and electron-withdrawing (nitro, fluoro, and bromo) groups were successfully converted to their corresponding ketones at room temperature in excellent yields after 3 h of reaction time (17 b–20 b, Table 3).

Table 3.

Selective oxidation of propargyl alcohols.[a]

Inline graphic
Entry Substrate Time [h] Product Yield[b] [%]
1 Inline graphic 6 Inline graphic 81
2 Inline graphic 6 Inline graphic 86
3 Inline graphic 8 Inline graphic 84
4 Inline graphic 3 Inline graphic 95
5 Inline graphic 3 Inline graphic 88
6 Inline graphic 3 Inline graphic 86
7 Inline graphic 3 Inline graphic 89

[a] Reagents and conditions: substrate (1 mmol), CuI (10 mol %), DMAP (10 mol %), and TEMPO (1 mol % ) in CH3CN (5 mL) under O2 balloon at rt; reaction time as mentioned in the table. [b] Isolated yield after column chromatography.

In conclusion, the developed chemoselective oxidation method is simple, clean and requires mild reaction conditions to produce a wide variety of functional-group-containing amino aldehydes, hydroxy aldehydes, and α,β-acetylenic carbonyl compounds. A highlight of the proposed method is the use of commercially available and cheap reagents. Remarkably, sensitive groups like alkynes and oxidizable groups such as activated benzylic carbons, hydroxy groups of phenols, amino groups, and heteroatoms (as in pyridine) did not undergo oxidation; rather, these reactions selectively gave the respective aldehydes and ketones in excellent yields. Furthermore, the target molecules were obtained without formation of any byproducts in the reaction mixture.

Experimental Section

Materials: The materials were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich and Merck, and were used without any additional purification. All reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Melting points were recorded in open capillaries on an Elchem digital melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker Avance-400 MHz instrument at room temperature. Samples for 1H and 13C NMR were ∼0.03 m solutions in CDCl3 using tetramethylsilane as internal reference. Coupling constants (J) are given in Hertz (Hz). Mass spectra were obtained using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and gas-chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) on a PerkinElmer Clarus 680.

General procedure for oxidation of alcohols: A mixture of 2-aminobenzyl alcohol (123 mg, 1 mmol), CuI (19.2 mg, 0.1 mmol), and CH3CN (5 mL) in a 25 mL round-bottom flask was stirred for 5–10 min. DMAP (12.1 mg, 0.1 mmol) and TEMPO (1.56 mg, 1 mol %,) were added, and the resulting mixture was stirred under an O2 balloon at rt until the reaction reached completion as determined by TLC. The resulting reaction mixture was filtered and washed with CH3CN (2×5 mL), and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The obtained residue was purified by column chromatography using 100—200 mesh silica gel (n-hexane/EtOAc, 98:2) to provide the desired product.

Supporting Information is available for detailed experimental procedures, characterization data, and spectral data of the synthesized compounds.

Acknowledgments

Dr. S. R. Reddy thanks the Department of Science and Technology–Science and Engineering Research Board (DST—SERB, India) Fast Track Scheme (SR/FT/CS-93/2011) for funding this project. The authors thank SIF-VIT-DST-FIST and VIT University for providing the NMR and GC-MS facilities. The authors thank Dr. Tetala Kali Kishore Reddy (VIT University) for his valuable suggestions during the drafting stage of this article.

Supporting Information

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supplementary

open0004-0107-sd1.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)

References

  • 1a.Cao Q, Dornan LM, Rogan L, Hughes NL, Muldoon MJ. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:4524. doi: 10.1039/c3cc47081d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1b.Punniyamurthy T, Velusamy S, Iqbal J. Chem. Rev. 2005;105:2329. doi: 10.1021/cr050523v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1c.Bäckvall J-E. Modern oxidation methods. John Wiley & Sons; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 2a.Mallat T, Baiker A. Chem. Rev. 2004;104:3037. doi: 10.1021/cr0200116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2b.Guo Z, Liu B, Zhang Q, Deng W, Wang Y, Yang Y. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:3480. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60282f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2c.Tojo G, Fernández MI. Oxidation of alcohols to aldehydes and ketones: a guide to current common practice. Springer; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Uyanik M, Ishihara K. Chem. Commun. 2009:2086. doi: 10.1039/b823399c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Prebil R, Stavber G, Stavber S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2014;2014:395. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kirihara M. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011;255:2281. [Google Scholar]
  • 6a.Semmelhack MF, Schmid CR, Cortes DA, Chou CS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984;106:3374. [Google Scholar]
  • 6b.Mannam S, Alamsetti SK, Sekar G. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007;349:2253. [Google Scholar]
  • 6c.Hoover JM, Stahl SS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011;133:16901. doi: 10.1021/ja206230h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6d.Allen SE, Walvoord RR, Padilla-Salinas R, Kozlowski MC. Chem. Rev. 2013;113:6234. doi: 10.1021/cr300527g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6e.Wendlandt AE, Suess AM, Stahl SS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:11062. doi: 10.1002/anie.201103945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2011;123 [Google Scholar]
  • 7a.Gamez P, Arends IWCE, Sheldon RA, Reedijk J. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004;346:805–811. [Google Scholar]
  • 7b.Greene JF, Hoover JM, Mannel DS, Root TW, Stahl SS. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2013;17:1247–1251. [Google Scholar]
  • 7c.Ryland BL, Stahl SS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:8824–8838. doi: 10.1002/anie.201403110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7d.Seki Y, Oisaki K, Kanai M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014;55:3738–3746. [Google Scholar]
  • 7e.Jiang N, Ragauskas AJ. Org. Lett. 2005;7:3689. doi: 10.1021/ol051293+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sasano Y, Nagasawa S, Yamazaki M, Shibuya M, Park J, Iwabuchi Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014;53:3236. doi: 10.1002/anie.201309634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.March J, Reaction AdvanceOrganicChemistry;, Mechanisms, Structure . 4th edn. NewYork: John Wiley & Sons; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jiang J-A, Du J-L, Wang Z-G, Zhang Z-N, Xu X, Zheng G-L, Ji Y-F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014;55:1677. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Basak A, Bdour HMd, Shain JC, Mandal S, Rudra KR, Nag S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000;10:1321. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(00)00237-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12a.Novokshonova IA, Novokshonov VV, Medvedeva AS. Synthesis. 2008;2008:3797. [Google Scholar]
  • 12b.Schmieder-van de Vondervoort L, Bouttemy S, Padron JM, Bras JL, Muzart J, Alsters PL. Synlett. 2002:0243. [Google Scholar]
  • 13a.Blay G, Cardona L, Fernndez I, Pedro JR. Synthesis. 2007;2007:3329. [Google Scholar]
  • 13b.Masutani K, Uchida T, Irie R, Katsuki T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:5119. [Google Scholar]
  • 13c.Liu J, Xie X, Ma S. Synthesis. 2012;2012:1569. [Google Scholar]
  • 13d.Maeda Y, Kakiuchi N, Matsumura S, Nishimura T, Kawamura T, Uemura S. J. Org. Chem. 2002;67:6718. doi: 10.1021/jo025918i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sakaguchi S, Takase T, Iwahama T, Ishii Y. Chem. Commun. 1998:2037. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Han C, Yu M, Sun W, Yao X. Synlett. 2011;2011:2363. [Google Scholar]
  • 16a.Reddy SR, Chadha A. RSC Adv. 2013;3:14929–14933. [Google Scholar]
  • 16b.Alonso DA, Nájera C, Pacheco MC. J. Org. Chem. 2004;69:1615. doi: 10.1021/jo035761+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17a.Reddy SR, Stella S, Chadha A. Synth. Commun. 2012;42:3493–3503. [Google Scholar]
  • 17b.Reddy SR, Das S, Punniyamurthy T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004;45:3561–3564. [Google Scholar]
  • 17c.Reddy CBRS, Reddy SR, Naidu S. Catal. Commun. 2014;56:50–54. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sonogashira K, Tohda Y, Hagihara N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975;16:4467. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary

open0004-0107-sd1.pdf (1.1MB, pdf)

Articles from ChemistryOpen are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES