Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Immunol. 2015 Mar 8;158(1):29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2015.02.015

Successful Newborn Screening for SCID in the Navajo Nation

Antonia Kwan a, Diana Hu b, Miran Song b, Heidi Gomes c, Denise R Brown b, Trudy Bourque c, Diana Gonzalez-Espinosa a, Zhili Lin d, Morton J Cowan a, Jennifer M Puck a
PMCID: PMC4420660  NIHMSID: NIHMS670662  PMID: 25762520

Abstract

Newborn screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) identifies affected infants before the onset of life-threatening infections, permitting optimal treatment. Navajo Native Americans have a founder mutation in the DNA repair enzyme Artemis, resulting in frequent Artemis SCID (SCID-A). A pilot study at 2 Navajo hospitals assessed the feasibility of SCID NBS in this population. Dried blood spots from 1,800 infants were assayed by PCR for T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs), a biomarker for naïve T cells. Starting in February 2012, TREC testing transitioned to standard care throughout the Navajo Area Indian Health Service, and a total of 7,900 infants were screened through July 2014. One infant had low TRECs and was diagnosed with non-SCID T lymphopenia, while 4 had undetectable TRECs due to SCID-A, all of whom were referred for hematopoietic cell transplantation. This report establishes the incidence of SCID-A and demonstrates effectiveness of TREC NBS in the Navajo.

Keywords: Artemis, Navajo, newborn screening, primary immunodeficiency, SCID, TREC

1. Introduction

Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) encompasses a group of genetic disorders characterized by a profound deficiency in both humoral and cell-mediated immunity [1]. SCID occurs in about 1/50,000 births, as assessed by unbiased, population based newborn screening [2-4]. Infants with SCID lack T cells and most have non-functional B cells, but 15-30% lack both T and B cells while retaining normal natural killer (NK) cells (T-B-NK+ phenotype) [5,6]. Most genetic mutations causing T-B-NK+ SCID disrupt antigen receptor recombination, required for development of a normal, diverse repertoire of T and B cells. In addition to lymphocyte restricted recombinase activating genes RAG1 and RAG2, DNA repair proteins expressed in all cells participate in antigen receptor rejoining; defects in these proteins can result in SCID as well as sensitivity to ionizing radiation and alkylating agents. The most common cause of radiosensitive SCID is mutation of DCLRE1C, the gene encoding the protein Artemis [7,8].

Over 3 decades ago, a high incidence of T-B-NK+ SCID, estimated at 1/2,000 births, was reported in Navajo and Apache Native Americans from the southwestern U.S. [9], and in 2002 the cause was discovered to be a Y192X truncation mutation in DCLRE1C [10]. This autosomal recessive trait was presumably present in survivors of the Long Walk in 1864, from Fort Defiance, Arizona, to Fort Sumner, New Mexico, a forced relocation by the U.S. government [11]. The ensuing Navajo population reduction and subsequent recovery may have increased the SCID allele frequency [12]. Although awareness of SCID led to carrier testing and prenatal diagnosis for SCID in some families with previously affected infants [13], the non-specific nature of presenting diarrhea and failure to thrive often delayed diagnosis. Early recognition of SCID is crucial for avoiding life-threatening infections that usually occur within the first 6 months of life. In contrast, definitive treatment by hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) leads to excellent survival in infants with SCID identified before the onset of infections [6].

The advent of a newborn screening (NBS) test for SCID presented an opportunity to implement population-based detection of affected Navajo infants before onset of infections. T-cell receptor excision circles (TRECs), circular byproducts of TCR V(D)J recombination, serve as a biomarker for newly formed naïve T cells [14]. Low or absent TRECs in DNA isolated from dried blood spots (DBS) already universally collected indicate low numbers of circulating naïve T cells regardless of the underlying genetic basis [15]. This is important because SCID from etiologies other than a DCLRE1C mutation has occurred among the Navajo [16].

Infants born at 2 hospitals in Chinle and Tuba City, Arizona, were invited to participate in a pilot study of TREC test implementation, beginning in March 2009. After successful completion of this study, SCID NBS was transitioned to standard clinical care throughout the Navajo Nation in February 2012, and is currently ongoing. We present the introduction of SCID NBS and outcomes of screening 7,900 infants through July 2014, including successful detection of 4 infants with SCID-A and one with T cell lymphopenia (TCL).

2. Patients, materials and methods

2.1 Navajo pilot study

All research was approved by the Navajo Nation Human Research Review Board (NNHRRB) and the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Committee on Human Research. An information pamphlet was approved for distribution in prenatal clinics and given to postpartum mothers (see Supp Text). Navajo study workers provided information to mothers, obtained face-to-face written informed consent, logged and tracked samples, and encoded samples to maintain confidentiality. Following routine heel-stick for standard NBS, an extra dried blood spot (DBS) was obtained on a “SCID TEST” blotter (ID Biological Systems, Greenville, SC). SCID blotters were couriered weekly to UCSF, and tested within a week of arrival. Residual study DBS material were destroyed after analysis, with documentation provided to the NNHRRB.

DNA was isolated robotically (AutoGenPrep 965, Autogen, Inc) using 96-well deep plates (Corning, Sigma Aldrich) from 3.2mm punches from control cord blood and study DBS [15]. After 16h at 65°C with proteinase K (0.5mg/mL), samples underwent organic extraction, DNA precipitation, 2 washes with 70% ethanol, and suspension in TE buffer 50μL. Quantitative PCR was performed using 5μL DNA in 20μL reactions containing 1x Taqman Gene Expression Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies), 0.5μM TREC or 0.25μM β-Actin primers, 150μM FAM-TAMRA labeled probe (Supp Table 1) and 0.04% BSA (New England Biolabs) [14, 15]. PCR conditions were 2m at 50°C, 5m at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles (30s at 95°C, 60s at 60°C) (7900HT Real-Time PCR System, Applied Biosystems). Serial dilutions of plasmids encoding TREC and β-Actin gene sequences (1x105–12.5 and 1x107–100 copies/reaction, respectively) and a plasmid dilution (1,000 copies of each amplicon) were included on each plate. In addition to local quality monitoring, proficiency testing was performed (through the Newborn Screening and Molecular Biology Branch, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA).

Samples with ≥100 TRECs/punch (equivalent to 33 TREC/μL of blood) were considered normal based on analysis of anonymous DBS from the California Department of Public Health Genetic Disease Screening Program (kindly supplied by Fred Lorey, PhD), while those with fewer TRECs had a second punch analyzed for TRECs and β-Actin copies (Supp Fig. 1A). Samples with 2 poor PCR results or low TRECs with normal β-Actin were reported to the study workers at enrolling hospitals, enabling local physicians to contact infants as needed for clinical evaluation.

2.2 TREC screening as standard of care

In February 2012, TREC testing for SCID became part of routine clinical NBS for infants born in the Navajo Nation, reflecting the recommendations of the U.S. DHHS Secretary in 2010 [17] as well as the Navajo Area Indian Health Service Pediatric Advisory Board. Clinical TREC testing was performed at PerkinElmer Genetics, Inc. using a testing algorithm similar to the study procedure above (Supp Fig. 1B) [18].

2.3 Statistics

Confidence intervals (1-sided) were derived from inversion of the cumulative binomial distribution.

3. Results

3.1 Pilot study

TREC newborn screening was initiated at Tuba City Regional Health Care Corporation and Chinle Comprehensive Health Care Facility, serving a large area with a mostly rural Native American population. During the enrollment period, 2,931 infants were born at the hospitals, of whom 61% had TREC screening completed; 2,796 (95%) of the infants’ mothers were visited by a Navajo study coordinator. Reasons that mothers were not interviewed included maternal or infant medical complications, infant out-of-hospital transfers for conditions requiring intensive care, and discharges prior to 24h. Consent from 1,837 mothers was obtained (66% of those interviewed), and 1,800 “SCID TEST” samples were collected and tested. Mothers who did not enroll their infants for SCID NBS cited a range of reasons (Table 1). Despite incomplete enrollment, the feasibility of integrating the TREC test into regular infant care in this setting was demonstrated.

Table 1.

Reasons giving for declining to enroll infant in SCID screening study (959 of 2,796 mothers interviewed)

Reason Proportion of mothers endorsing
Mother is not interested. 25%
Baby looks healthy, so test not required. 23%
Mother needs more time to consider it. 10%
If test is voluntary, mother does not want it. 9%
Enrolling would be against traditional beliefs. 7%
Baby has had enough testing. 4%
Father or other family members are against it. 3%
Mother is not Navajo. 3%
(Uncommon reasons, each)* <2%
(No reason recorded) 11%
*

Examples: prior baby already tested, privacy concerns, does not think SCID is a serious problem.

In the first summer of the study a decline in mean TREC number occurred in samples from both sites between May (398 and 422 TRECs/μL for Tuba City and Chinle, respectively) and June (185 and 203, respectively) (Supp Fig. 2). Although no samples during June had TRECs below the normal cutoff, a procedural review was conducted. PCR artifacts were excluded based on standard curves and controls that accompanied every assay. Further investigation revealed that in the Arizona desert summer, evaporative coolers were used where the DBS samples were being stored. To reduce effects of humidity, likely to degrade DBS DNA quality based on observations from other NBS tests (Fred Lorey, personal communication), the study procedure was modified to require sealing each sample in a Mylar bag containing desiccant discs. With this change the TREC copy numbers returned to baseline by July (Supp Fig. 2), exhibiting no further variation.

Of the 1,800 initial DBS samples, 1,787 (99.3%) had normal TRECs (Supp Fig. 1A). At the study hospitals, a second DBS was obtained routinely at each infant's 2-week pediatric visit, allowing for collection of repeat TREC samples where required. Eleven infants with initial inconclusive DBS had a second DBS showing normal TRECs. Two infants were initial positive cases with low TRECs and normal β-Actin; one infant was withdrawn from the study because the parents did not want repeat TREC testing. The other initial positive case (Patient 1, Table 2) had TCL by flow cytometry (discussed in Section 3.3).

Table 2.

Immunological profiles of infants with low TRECs identified by screening.

Values at diagnosis Pt 1 Pt 2a Pt 3 Pt 4 Pt 5
TRECs (>25 copies/μL) 11b 0 0, 0 0 0
WBC (>5,000 /μL) 4700 4400 3500 1100 700
Neutrophils (>1,000 /μL) 2540 2290 2120 8050 5500
Lymphocytes (>2,500 /μL) 1290 350 480 1560 300
CD3 T cells (>2,500 /μL) 632 46 1 116 0
CD4 T cells (>1,600 /μL) 439 39 1 116 0
CD8 T cells (>560 /μL) 206 7 0 19 0
CD19 B cells (>300 /μL) 310 <4 0 <10 0
CD16/56 NK cells (>170 /μL) 348 291 96 815 390
CD4 naive cells (>1,200 /μL) 167 <1 4 <1 0
CD45 cell proliferation to PHA (>50%) >50% 0.9% 0.4% 3.3% 0.5%
Maternal T cell engraftment detected by short tandem repeat DNA markers (% of total T cells) Not done 1% 1% 55% Not detected
IgG (passive maternal IgG) 709 1030 1038 <100 684
IgA (8-45 mg/dL) 34 620 <5 <8 <6
IgM (10-40 mg/dL) 87 20 <5 <25 <5
Molecular diagnosis None (see text) Homozygous mutation for SCID-Ac Homozygous mutation for SCID-Ac Homozygous mutation for SCID-Ac Homozygous mutation for SCID-Ac
Values at 7 months of age, after vaccinations
CD3 T cells (>1,900 /μL) 729
Anti-pneumococcal titers, protective/total tested 8/12
Anti-tetanus titer (>0.2 protective) 3.2
a

This patient was listed in a previous publication [4]

b

Abnormal values for age in bold type

c

DCLRE1C exon 8, cDNA 597 C>A , causing TAC (tyrosine) to become TAA (termination codon); p Y192X.

3.2 Expansion to standard care

In February 2012, SCID NBS was rolled out as part of the routine NBS at all Navajo Nation maternity hospitals in Arizona and New Mexico. DBS samples for TREC testing were collected and stored according to established study protocol and sent weekly to PerkinElmer Genetics, Inc. for SCID screening. Results were returned to designated local pediatricians and also reported to the senior pediatric consultant in Tuba City (Supp Fig. 1B). By June 2012, all infants born at participating hospitals and present at 24h of age were screened, as were infants born elsewhere but enrolling for care by 6 weeks of age at Navajo Reservation clinics; none of 6,100 DBS screened were inconclusive, but 4 infants had undetectable TRECs and proved to have SCID-A. A summary of the first 17 months of standard care screening with a single SCID-A case in 3,498 infants (Pt 2 here) was included in a publication on SCID NBS in 11 programs [4]. This current, comprehensive report reaches back to include findings from the pilot (1,800 infants) as well as 13 more recent months of screening 2,602 previously unpublished infants, including 3 more with SCID-A.

3.3 Infants with low TRECs

Five infants, 1/1,580 births (95% CI 1/870-3,300) were identified as abnormal, one with low TRECs and TCL associated with congenital anomalies during the pilot phase and 4 with undetectable TRECs and mutation-proven SCID-A during standard care screening (Table 2). All 5 infants presented with low absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) and no visible thymus tissue on initial chest radiographs. SCID-A patients received treatment at UCSF.

Pt 1

this term female had 11 TRECs/μL blood, with normal β-Actin on NBS (Table 2). Family history was negative. In addition to lack of a thymic shadow, chest radiogram showed thoracic scoliosis with incomplete fusion of T7 and a T10 hemivertebra. She developed neonatal tetany due to primary hypoparathyroidism, responding to calcium supplementation. Flow cytometry showed only 632 CD3 T cells/μL (normal >2,500/μL), but proliferation to PHA was normal, as was the diverse T cell repertoire demonstrated by spectratyping. A chromosome copy number array, fluorescent in-situ hybridization for DiGeorge syndrome and TBX1 gene sequence were normal. Live rotavirus vaccination was given without sequelae, and routine killed vaccines elicited robust antibody responses at 7 months. Despite persistent TCL she has experienced no severe infections.

Pt 2 (listed in [4])

this term female had undetectable TRECs with normal β-Actin on NBS; immune studies were consistent with T-B-NK+ SCID (Table 2). Although no family history of SCID was recorded before the NBS result, upon review 2 distant cousins had succumbed to SCID, one with complications following attempted HCT and the other with an infection before HCT could be performed. Physical examination at 4 weeks was normal except for an oral ulcer, a previously described non-infectious characteristic of SCID-A [19]. At 2 months she received a haploidentical, CD34 selected, T cell depleted peripheral HCT from her mother without pre-conditioning, followed by a stem cell boost at 7 months. She developed mild graft vs. host disease (GVHD), autoimmune hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia, all resolving with steroids. Her CD3 T cell count was 304/μL at 20 months of age, with normal proliferation to PHA. She is healthy, but remains B-lymphopenic, and requires gammaglobulin support.

Pt 3

this male infant born at 36 weeks’ gestation had two NBS (repeated for preterm birth) with undetectable TRECs, but normal β-Actin, and absent T and B cells (Table 2). He was healthy at 4 weeks of age except for an oral ulcer that interfered with feeding. Review of the family history revealed a deceased older sibling who had experienced recurrent pneumonias with fatality at age 6 months, but for whom no immunologic studies were done. At 5 weeks he received a haploidentical, CD34 selected, T cell depleted peripheral HCT from his mother without pre-conditioning. His course was complicated by infection with HHV6 and refractory GVHD treated with sirolimus, prednisolone, basiliximab and methylprednisolone. Because of persistent T-lymphopenia, he received a second maternal HCT at 13 months with reduced-intensity conditioning chemotherapy. He continued to have further complications including venoocclusive disease, ongoing GVHD, HHV6, pulmonary infiltration causing respiratory distress and eventual demise at 15 months.

Pt 4

this term female was discharged after birth without SCID NBS collected and failed to return for this test until 2 months of age. At this visit, a TREC test was obtained, but 2-month vaccinations were also given, including live attenuated rotavirus oral vaccine. Within two days, her NBS showed undetectable TRECs. At her local hospital, she had loose stools that tested positive for rotavirus antigen, and further studies confirmed SCID-A (Table 2). At 3 months she received a haploidentical, CD34 selected, T cell depleted peripheral HCT from her mother without pre-conditioning, with a stem cell boost at 5 months. She has developed donor CD3 T cell engraftment at 8 months, but remains on immunoglobulin infusions.

Pt 5

this healthy term female had undetectable TRECs with normal β-Actin on NBS, undetectable T or B cells, and normal NK cells (Table 2). At 8 weeks, following serotherapy with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin, she received a haploidentical, CD34 selected, T cell depleted peripheral HCT from her mother. Due to failure to engraft a second HCT with a matched unrelated donor was performed at age 5 months.

4. Discussion

This report describes the successful implementation of newborn screening for SCID in the Navajo Nation, and emphasizes the importance of mandatory SCID NBS in this population with increased frequency of SCID due to the founder mutation in Artemis. The initial pilot study with informed consent was undertaken to establish whether SCID NBS could be accomplished in this rural population with its distinctive traditions and values. A face-to-face written consent process was mandated during the study phase to assure that participants were fully informed and knew that participation in research was voluntary [20, 21]. Only two-thirds of new mothers agreed to enroll their infant, with refusals reflecting attitudes shared across cultures [22] as well as deriving from traditional values (Table 1); nonetheless sufficient enrollment occurred to demonstrate DBS sample collection, TREC testing and follow-up could be integrated into pediatric care, provided DBS were protected from humidity. Based on the pilot study, together with the known high risk for SCID among the Navajo, the health benefits of screening were judged sufficiently important that this test was adopted as standard care. The high specificity of the TREC test throughout both phases reported here, with 0.2% indeterminate results, is comparable to other SCID NBS programs [2-4]; repeat DBS testing where needed was facilitated by the existing practice of obtaining a routine second DBS sample from all infants during the first month of life.

The benefit of this public health measure to the Navajo people has been realized, with detection of absent TRECs in 4 infants leading to otherwise unsuspected diagnoses of SCID-A. TREC screening in one infant was delayed, resulting in exposure to live rotavirus vaccine that caused diarrheal illness [23], emphasizing the importance of complete implementation and physician awareness to avoid infectious exposures in infants whose screening tests have not been reported as normal [23]. The remaining 3 SCID infants were diagnosed early and protected from infectious exposures with isolation, prophylactic antibiotics, and prompt referral for HCT. Given the known DNA repair defect of SCID-A, DNA damaging chemotherapy and radiation were minimized. Unfortunately persistent HHV6 in Pt 3 was associated with prolonged lymphopenia and refractory GVHD, ultimately leading to his demise.

One case of non-SCID TCL and associated anomalies was also found by NBS; Pt 1 received prompt follow up, avoided serious infections, and remained healthy at 2.5 years of age.

NBS has confirmed that the incidence of SCID-A in the Navajo Nation is very close to the original estimate of 1 per 2,000 births, nearly 30-fold higher than in the general population [4]. In contrast to screening programs in many states [2-4], most abnormal TREC screens in Navajo infants, 1/1,580 births, are due to SCID because the incidence of SCID-A is high and that preterm and ill infants, a major source of abnormal TREC tests and TCL in other screening programs, are transported to high level care beyond the Navajo Nation before newborn screening tests are sent. Continuation and expansion of SCID NBS is particularly important in areas where Navajo and Apache infants at high risk for SCID are born, but universal implementation will afford early detection for all forms of SCID and other TCL conditions to all infants.

5. Conclusion

In the Navajo population, where a founder mutation causes frequent SCID, benefit from SCID NBS has been demonstrated, with affected infants receiving prompt diagnosis and early referral for definitive treatment. The benefit of SCID NBS in this high-risk population demonstrates the importance of early detection and supports extending SCID NBS to newborns everywhere.

Supplementary Material

1
2

Highlights.

  • A research study found SCID newborn screening feasible for Navajo Native Americans.

  • When face-to-face consent was required, only two thirds of infants were screened.

  • Artemis-deficient SCID due to a founder mutation was identified by screening, permitting early treatment.

  • Population-based screening confirmed SCID in 1 per 2,000 Navajo births.

Acknowledgements

This study was made possible through collaboration with the Navajo Nation Institutional Review Board, Beverly Becenti-Pigman, LLD, Chair. Drs. Robert Vogt and Harry Hannon provided encouragement and helpful suggestions and initiated the Center for Disease Control and Prevention TREC Proficiency Testing Program. Dr. Fred Lorey provided helpful suggestions and access to materials for standardization. The authors thank all of the study staff and physicians who provided invaluable assistance at the Navajo Area maternity centers, and Yanning Wang for expert technical assistance with TREC samples. Bill Slimak and colleagues at PerkinElmer donated clinical TREC testing to introduce SCID newborn screening in the Navajo Nation. Preliminary versions of the pilot results were presented at the Navajo Nation Research Conference, Window Rock, AZ, 2011.

This work was supported by NIH RO3 HD060311 (JMP), N01 AI30070 and U24 AI086037 to Immune Deficiency Foundation US Immunodeficiency Network (JMP), U54 AI082973 Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium (MJC, Pilot Study Award to JMP), NCATS UL1 TR000004 UCSF CTSI (JMP); HRSA U32 MC00148 National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center, U Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, to Brad L. Therrell (JMP); UCSF Jeffrey Modell Diagnostic Center for Primary Immunodeficiencies; HCA International Foundation Travelling Scholarship (AK).

Abbreviations

DBS

dried blood spots

dsDNA

double strand DNA

GVHD

graft vs. host disease

HCT

hematopoietic cell transplant

NBS

newborn screening

SCID

severe combined immunodeficiency

SCID-A

Artemis deficient SCID

TCL

T cell lymphopenia

TCR

T cell receptor

TREC

T-cell receptor excision circle

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Al-Herz W, et al. Primary immunodeficiency diseases: an update on the classification from the international union of immunological societies expert committee for primary immunodeficiency. Front Immunol. 2011;2:54. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2011.00054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Verbsky J, Thakar M, Routes J. The Wisconsin approach to newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129(3):622–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kwan A, et al. Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency and T-cell lymphopenia in California: Results of the first 2 years. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(1):140–150. e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kwan A, et al. Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency in 11 screening programs in the United States. JAMA. 2014;312(7):729–38. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.9132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dvorak CC, et al. The natural history of children with severe combined immunodeficiency: baseline features of the first fifty patients of the primary immune deficiency treatment consortium prospective study 6901. J Clin Immunol. 2013;33(7):1156–64. doi: 10.1007/s10875-013-9917-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pai SY, et al. Transplantation outcomes for severe combined immunodeficiency, 2000-2009. New Engl J Med. 2014;371(5):434–46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dvorak CC, Cowan MJ. Radiosensitive severe combined immunodeficiency disease. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2010;30(1):125–42. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2009.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.de Villartay JP, et al. Human and animal models of V(D)J recombination deficiency. Curr Opin Immunol. 2003;15(5):592–8. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(03)00101-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Murphy S, et al. Gene enrichment in an American Indian population: an excess of severe combined immunodeficiency disease. Lancet. 1980;2(8193):502–5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91833-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li L, et al. A founder mutation in Artemis, an SNM1-like protein, causes SCID in Athabascan-speaking Native Americans. J Immunol. 2002;168(12):6323–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.12.6323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cheek LW. Look West Series. Rio Nuevo Publishers; Tucson: 2004. The Navajo Long Walk. p. 64. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jones JF, et al. Severe combined immunodeficiency among the Navajo. I. Characterization of phenotypes, epidemiology, and population genetics. Hum Biol. 1991;63(5):669–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li L, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and carrier detection for Athabascan severe combined immunodeficiency disease. Prenat Diagn. 2002;22(9):763–8. doi: 10.1002/pd.400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Douek DC, et al. Assessment of thymic output in adults after haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and prediction of T-cell reconstitution. Lancet. 2000;355(9218):1875–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02293-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chan K, Puck JM. Development of population-based newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115(2):391–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.O'Marcaigh AS, et al. Maternal mosaicism for a novel interleukin-2 receptor gamma-chain mutation causing X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency in a Navajo kindred. J Clin Immunol. 1997;17(1):29–33. doi: 10.1023/a:1027332327827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Howell RR. [August 12, 2014];Report on Newborn Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency 2011; Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children] Available from: http://www.hrsa.gov/advisorycommittees/mchbadvisory/heritabledisorders/recommendations/correspondence/severeimmunodeficiency.pdf.
  • 18.Hannon WH, et al. Newborn Blood Spot Screening for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency by Measurement of T-cell Receptor Excision Circles; Approved Guideline. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; Wayne, PA.: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kwong PC, et al. Oral and genital ulceration: a unique presentation of immunodeficiency in Athabascan-speaking American Indian children with severe combined immunodeficiency. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(8):927–31. doi: 10.1001/archderm.135.8.927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tarini BA, et al. Waiving informed consent in newborn screening research: balancing social value and respect. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2008;148C(1):23–30. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Botkin JR, et al. Parental Permission for Pilot Newborn Screening Research: Guidelines From the NBSTRN. Pediatrics. 2014;133(2):e410–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Feuchtbaum L, Cunningham G, Sciortino S. Questioning the Need for Informed Consent: A Case Study of California's Experience with a Pilot Newborn Screening Research Project. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2007;2(3):3–14. doi: 10.1525/jer.2007.2.3.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bakare N, et al. Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and rotavirus vaccination: reports to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). Vaccine. 2010;28(40):6609–12. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.07.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2

RESOURCES