Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Clinical Investigation logoLink to The Journal of Clinical Investigation
. 1987 Sep;80(3):797–803. doi: 10.1172/JCI113136

Relationship between canine transthoracic impedance and defibrillation threshold. Evidence for current-based defibrillation.

B B Lerman, H R Halperin, J E Tsitlik, K Brin, C W Clark, O C Deale
PMCID: PMC442305  PMID: 3624489

Abstract

The electrical parameter used to define defibrillation strength is energy. Peak current, however, may more accurately reflect the field quantities (i.e., electric field strength and current density) that mediate defibrillation and therefore should be a better clinical descriptor of threshold than energy. Though transthoracic impedance is a major determinant of energy-based threshold and is sensitive to operator-dependent changes in impedance (electrode-subject interface), an ideal threshold descriptor should be invariant with respect to these changes in impedance. We therefore compared the relative invariance of energy- and current-based thresholds when transthoracic impedance was altered by one of two methods: (a) change in electrode size (protocol A) or (b) change in electrode force (protocol B). In protocol A, impedance was altered in each dog by a mean of 95%. Energy thresholds determined at both low and high impedance were 44 +/- 21 J (mean +/- SD) and 105 +/- 35 J, respectively, P less than 0.0001. In contrast, peak current (A) thresholds were independent of transthoracic impedance, 22 +/- 5 A (low impedance) vs. 24 +/- 6 A (high impedance), P = NS. Energy and current thresholds showed a similar relationship for animals tested in protocol B. Therefore, current-based thresholds, in contrast to energy thresholds are independent of operator-dependent variables of transthoracic impedance and are invariant for a given animal. These results suggest that redefining defibrillation threshold in terms of peak current rather than energy provides a superior method of defibrillation.

Full text

PDF
797

Images in this article

799Image
on p.799

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adgey A. A. Electrical energy requirements for ventricular defibrillation. Br Heart J. 1978 Nov;40(11):1197–1199. doi: 10.1136/hrt.40.11.1197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adgey A. A., Patton J. N., Campbell N. P., Webb S. W. Ventricular defibrillation: appropriate energy levels. Circulation. 1979 Aug;60(2):219–223. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.60.2.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Armayor M. R., Savino G., Valentinuzzi M. E., Clavin O. E., Monzón J. E., Arredondo M. T. Ventricular defibrillation thresholds with capacitor discharge. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1979 Jul;17(4):435–442. doi: 10.1007/BF02447054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen P. S., Wolf P. D., Claydon F. J., Dixon E. G., Vidaillet H. J., Jr, Danieley N. D., Pilkington T. C., Ideker R. E. The potential gradient field created by epicardial defibrillation electrodes in dogs. Circulation. 1986 Sep;74(3):626–636. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.3.626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Connell P. N., Ewy G. A., Dahl C. F., Ewy M. D. Transthoracic impedance to defibrillator discharge. Effect of electrode size and electrode-chest wall interface. J Electrocardiol. 1973;6(4):313–31M. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(73)80053-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dahl C. F., Ewy G. A., Warner E. D., Thomas E. D. Myocardial necrosis from direct current countershock. Effect of paddle electrode size and time interval between discharges. Circulation. 1974 Nov;50(5):956–961. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.50.5.956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ehsani A., Ewy G. A., Sobel B. E. Effects of electrical countershock on serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) isoenzyme activity. Am J Cardiol. 1976 Jan;37(1):12–18. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90492-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ewy G. A., Ewy M. D., Nuttall A. J., Nuttall A. W. Canine transthoracic resistance. J Appl Physiol. 1972 Jan;32(1):91–94. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1972.32.1.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gascho J. A., Crampton R. S., Sipes J. N., Cherwek M. L., Hunter F. P., O'Brien W. M. Energy levels and patient weight in ventricular defibrillation. JAMA. 1979 Sep 28;242(13):1380–1384. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Geddes L. A., Tacker W. A., Jr, Schoenlein W., Minton M., Grubbs S., Wilcox P. The prediction of the impedance of the thorax to defibrillating current. Med Instrum. 1976 May-Jun;10(3):159–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Geddes L. A., Tacker W. A., Rosborough J. P., Moore A. G., Cabler P. S. Electrical dose for ventricular defibrillation of large and small animals using precordial electrodes. J Clin Invest. 1974 Jan;53(1):310–319. doi: 10.1172/JCI107552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jones J. L., Jones R. E. Postshock arrhythmias--a possible cause of unsuccessful defibrillation. Crit Care Med. 1980 Mar;8(3):167–171. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198003000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jones J. L., Lepeschkin E., Jones R. E., Rush S. Response of cultured myocardial cells to countershock-type electric field stimulation. Am J Physiol. 1978 Aug;235(2):H214–H222. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1978.235.2.H214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kerber R. E., Grayzel J., Hoyt R., Marcus M., Kennedy J. Transthoracic resistance in human defibrillation. Influence of body weight, chest size, serial shocks, paddle size and paddle contact pressure. Circulation. 1981 Mar;63(3):676–682. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.63.3.676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kerber R. E., Jensen S. R., Gascho J. A., Grayzel J., Hoyt R., Kennedy J. Determinants of defibrillation: prospective analysis of 183 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1983 Oct 1;52(7):739–745. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90408-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kerber R. E., Kouba C., Martins J., Kelly K., Low R., Hoyt R., Ferguson D., Bailey L., Bennett P., Charbonnier F. Advance prediction of transthoracic impedance in human defibrillation and cardioversion: importance of impedance in determining the success of low-energy shocks. Circulation. 1984 Aug;70(2):303–308. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.70.2.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kerber R. E., McPherson D., Charbonnier F., Kieso R., Hite P. Automated impedance-based energy adjustment for defibrillation: experimental studies. Circulation. 1985 Jan;71(1):136–140. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.71.1.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kerber R. E., Sarnat W. Factors influencing the success of ventricular defibrillation in man. Circulation. 1979 Aug;60(2):226–230. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.60.2.226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lown B., Crampton R. S., DeSilva R. A., Gascho J. Health-manpower needs. N Engl J Med. 1978 Jun 1;298(22):1252–1253. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197806012982210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Machin J. W. Thoracic impedance of human subjects. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1978 Mar;16(2):169–178. doi: 10.1007/BF02451918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Patton J. N., Pantridge J. F. Current required for ventricular defibrillation. Br Med J. 1979 Feb 24;1(6162):513–514. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6162.513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tacker W. A., Jr, Ewy G. A. Emergency defibrillation dose: recommendations and rationale. Circulation. 1979 Aug;60(2):223–225. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.60.2.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Trantham J. L., Gallagher J. J., German L. D., Broughton A., Guarnieri T., Kasell J. Effects of energy delivery via a His bundle catheter during closed chest ablation of the atrioventricular conduction system. J Clin Invest. 1983 Nov;72(5):1563–1574. doi: 10.1172/JCI111115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Warner E. D., Dahl C., Ewy G. A. Myocardial injury from transthoracic defibrillator countershock. Arch Pathol. 1975 Jan;99(1):55–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Weaver W. D., Cobb L. A., Copass M. K., Hallstrom A. P. Ventricular defibrillation -- a comparative trial using 175-J and 320-J shocks. N Engl J Med. 1982 Oct 28;307(18):1101–1106. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198210283071801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation

RESOURCES