Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 7.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Thromb Hemost. 2005 Apr;31(2):205–216. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-869526

Molecular Recognition at Adenine Nucleotide (P2) Receptors in Platelets

Kenneth A Jacobson 2,1, Liaman Mamedova 2, Bhalchandra V Joshi 2, Pedro Besada 2, Stefano Costanzi 2
PMCID: PMC4423562  NIHMSID: NIHMS31395  PMID: 15852224

Abstract

Transmembrane signaling through P2Y receptors for extracellular nucleotides controls a diverse array of cellular processes, including thrombosis. Selective agonists and antagonists of the two P2Y receptors present on the platelet surface—the Gq-coupled P2Y1 subtype and the Gi-coupled P2Y12 subtype—are now known. High-affinity antagonists of each have been developed from nucleotide structures. The (N)-methano-carba bisphosphate derivatives MRS2279 and MRS2500 are potent and selective P2Y1 receptor antagonists. The carbocyclic nucleoside AZD6140 is an uncharged, orally active P2Y12 receptor antagonist of nM affinity. Another nucleotide receptor on the platelet surface, the P2X1 receptor, the activation of which may also be proaggregatory, especially under conditions of high shear stress, has high-affinity ligands, although high selectivity has not yet been achieved. Although α,β-methylene–adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is the classic agonist for the P2X1 receptor, where it causes rapid desensitization, the agonist BzATP is among the most potent in activating this subtype. The aromatic sulfonates NF279 and NF449 are potent antagonists of the P2X1 receptor. The structures of the two platelet P2Y receptors have been modeled, based on a rhodopsin template, to explain the basis for nucleotide recognition within the putative transmembrane binding sites. The P2Y1 receptor model, especially, has been exploited in the design and optimization of antagonists targeted to interact selectively with that subtype.

Keywords: G protein–coupled receptors, P2Y receptors, agonist, antagonist, mutant


Adenine nucleotides influence platelet aggregation by interacting with three different receptors: P2Y1 and P2Y12, two metabotropic receptors coupled to Gαq and Gαi, respectively, and P2X1, an ionotropic receptor that mediates rapid calcium influx.1,2 Simultaneous stimulation of the two P2Y receptors in platelets induces aggregation; stimulation of each alone is insufficient for full aggregation.3 P2Y1 receptor activation is particularly associated with the initial shape change of platelets in response to ADP.3,4 P2X1 receptor activation may also be proaggregatory, especially under conditions of high shear stress.5

Medicinal chemical studies of P2 receptors are largely concerned with the development of selective small molecules as agonists or antagonists of a given receptor. Rational approaches to the design of such ligands take into account the structure of the target biopolymers, in other words, G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) (P2Y receptors) or ligand-gated ion channels (P2X receptors). The structural differences among the three platelet nucleotide receptors can be exploited to design compounds targeted to interact with each single receptor regulating the distinct functions that they play in the process of aggregation. This article will summarize the structures of known selective and partially selective ligands for the three nucleotide receptors found on the surface of platelets and will provide insights into the microscopic interactions within the binding sites of these receptors. The structural aspects of the receptors are especially focused on the P2Y1 receptors,68 which have been characterized by detailed mutagenesis9 and molecular modeling based on the structural template of bovine rhodopsin.

STRUCTURE OF P2Y AND P2X RECEPTORS

Human P2Y receptors are a family of nucleotide-activated GPCRs that comprise at least eight different subtypes with different selectivity, for example, for adenine versus uracil nucleotides and for 5′-diphosphates versus 5′-triphosphates. Both P2Y110 and P2Y1211,12 are selectively activated by the nucleotide adenosine diphosphate (ADP, 1).

By means of a phylogenetic analysis we delineated two clearly distinct subgroups of P2Y receptors: the Gq-coupled subtypes (i.e., P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, P2Y6, and P2Y11) and those coupled to Gi (i.e., P2Y12, P2Y13, and P2Y14).6 Therefore, functional effects described later that are mediated by the P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors refer to activation of phospholipase C (PLC) and inhibition of adenylate cyclase, respectively.

P2Y receptors have been successfully modeled6,8,13 by homology modeling based on the high resolution structure of bovine rhodopsin14 as a template. Our most recent models are derived from a multiple sequence alignment based on a combined manual and automatic approach that takes into account not only the primary structure of the proteins, but also the three-dimensional information deducible from the secondary and tertiary structure of the template.

As for all other GPCRs, P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors consist of single polypeptide chains that cross the cell membrane seven times, forming seven helical transmembrane domains (TMs) connected by three extracellular (ELs) and three intracellular loops (ILs). The amino terminal region (NT) is located outside the cell, and the carboxyl terminal region (CT) is located in the cytoplasm. According to our models,6 at the cytoplasmic end of TM7 both of the receptors fold at an angle of approximately 90 degrees to form a helical segment (homologous to H8 in rhodopsin)14 that runs parallel to the plane of the cell membrane.

The role of the ELs in ligand recognition and receptor activation has been studied.7 Two essential disulfide bridges in the extracellular domains of the human P2Y1 receptor were also identified by site-directed mutagenesis7: one connecting EL2 with the upper part of TM3 (conserved among most GPCRs and confirmed by the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin)14 and another between the N-terminal domain and EL3. On the basis of a bioinformatic study, we proposed the existence of the same disulfide bridges for the other subtypes of P2Y receptors, including P2Y12.6

The putative binding site of the human P2Y1 receptor has been extensively studied by means of site-directed mutagenesis. To ascertain which residues of this receptor were involved in ligand recognition, individual residues of the TMs and ELs were mutated to Ala.7,9 A cluster of positively charged amino acid side chains in TMs 3, 6, and 7 were proposed to form the counter ions to the negatively charged diphosphate or triphosphate moiety. Site-directed mutagenesis has validated this prediction and further indicated several uncharged hydrophilic residues that may coordinate the nucleobase. Thus, agonists, such as 2-methylthio-adenosine-5′-diphosphate (2-MeSADP 4) were inactive at R128(3.29)A and R310(7.39)A and at S314(7.43)A mutant P2Y1 receptors and had a markedly reduced potency at K280(6.55)A and Q307(7.36)A mutant P2Y1 receptors.

After the construction of the rhodopsin-based homology models, we performed mutagenesis-driven automatic docking experiments at P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors. The results suggested that ADP binds to the P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors on the exofacial side of the cavity delimited by TM1, TM2, TM3, TM6, and TM7 and capped with EL2 (Fig. 1). We proposed the existence of two different sets of three basic amino acids involved in the phosphate coordination for the two subgroups. In the case of the P2Y1 subgroup, in good agreement with the available mutagenesis data, these residues were R3.29, K/R6.55, and R7.39. Among them, only R6.55 was common to both subgroups.6 In the P2Y12 subgroup, in fact, the role of R3.29 in TM3 seemed to be fulfilled by a Lys residue in EL2, whereas the R7.39 in TM7 seemed to be substituted by K7.35 located within the same TM but at a distance of four residues, in other words, one helical turn in the exofacial direction.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Modeled structures of the putative binding sites of P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors.6 The putative nucleotide binding site as viewed from the plane of the plasma membrane with a docked ADP molecule, based on mutagensis and molecular modeling experiments is shown. Key residues found to interact with the ligand in the human P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors are indicated. To the left of each detailed structure is a smaller three-dimensional representation of the receptor including seven TMs (color coded) and the connecting loops. Color of TMs: cyan (TM1), orange (TM2), green (TM3), magenta (TM4), blue (TM5), red (TM6), gray (TM7). The orientation of the entire receptor relative to the membrane is the same as for each detailed binding site model.

Ligand docking at P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors provided a hypothesis for the coordination of nucleotide-like antagonists in the TM regions, consistent with site-directed mutagenesis results, with a binding mode very similar to that of the agonist.7,13 Molecular recognition in the P2Y1 receptor of non-nucleotide antagonists, such as derivatives of pyridoxal-phosphate-6-azophenyl-2′,4′-disulphonic acid (PPADS) 20, has also been studied.15

P2X receptors are composed of seven subtypes of subunits (P2X1–7), and each functional ion channel consists of oligomers, probably trimers.16 Both homo-and hetero-oligomerization seem to occur commonly. For example, the P2X1 receptor is known to form heteromers with P2X2 and P2X5 receptors.17 Each subunit consists of a single polypeptide chain 399 amino acids in length containing two TMs connected by a large EL, which is likely endowed with five disulfide bridges and four glycosylation sites. The N-terminal and the C-terminal domains are cytoplasmic. The structures of P2X receptors are not yet amenable to homology modeling because of the lack of a protein template. Of the two TMs of the P2X1 receptor, the second TM (proximal to the C-terminus) is predicted to be of a more regular α-helical structure.18 Extensive mutagenesis has been performed to identify residues involved in ligand recognition in P2X118 and other P2X receptors.19,20

P2Y1 AND P2Y12 RECEPTOR LIGANDS

Agonists

The P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors are activated by adenine nucleotides, but not by uracil nucleotides. The P2Y1 receptor is activated more potently by ADP 1 than by ATP 2.10 The P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors are not activated by either adenosine monophosphate (AMP) or adenosine. ADP is a full agonist, whereas ATP appears to be a partial agonist in some models of P2Y1 receptors. At P2Y12 receptors, ADP derivatives activate and ATP derivatives antagonize. Thus, ATP inhibits ADP-induced human platelet aggregation with a Ki value of about 20 mM.21 Terminal thiophosphate groups appear in many useful nucleotide agonists of P2Y receptors present in platelets. For example, ADP-β-S 3 is a potent agonist of both the P2Y1 receptor (EC50 [median effective concentration] of 96 nM) and the P2Y12 subtype (EC50 82 nM).2 ATP-γ-S is a slightly more potent agonist of the P2Y1 receptor than ATP.2

The 2 position of the adenine nucleobase of adenosine-5′ -phosphate derivatives has also proved to be amenable to derivatization for P2Y agonists, whereas substitution at the 8 position greatly reduces potency.21 Most notably, the 2-alkylthio ethers in ADP and ATP series22 appear to provide high potency at the P2Y1 receptor. The corresponding O-ethers are less potent. The 2-methylthio derivative of ADP 4 is a potent agonist (EC50 in nM) at P2Y1 (6), P2Y12 (1), and P2Y13 (1) receptors2,23 and an important pharmacological probe for studying these subtypes. The 2-methylthio derivative of ADP 4 was recently found to be three orders of magnitude more potent than ADP was at the purified human P2Y12 receptor.24 2-Azido-ADP and 2-chloro-ADP are more potent than ADP is in inducing aggregation of human platelets. Only limited substitution is allowed at the N7 position of adenine nucleotides acting as inducers of platelet aggregation.

Several adenosine 5′-monophosphate analogues, such as 2-hexylthioadenosine-5′-monophasphate (HT-AMP) 5 (EC50 59 nM at the turkey P2Y1 receptor) have been found to potently activate P2Y1 receptors.25 The α-thio modification of AMP analogues (e.g., 6) increases potency at the P2Y1 receptor,26 and agonist activation of PLC is maintained. Such 2-modified AMP derivatives have also been reported to inhibit ectonucleotidases, which complicates their use as P2Y receptor agonists. Adenosine-5′-(1-boranotriphosphate) derivatives such as the 2-methylthio derivative 7 (EC50 2.6 nM at the rat P2Y1 receptor) have been found to potently activate the P2Y1 receptor,27 indicating that –BH2 may substitute for an ionic oxygen of the α-phosphate when bound to the P2Y1 receptor binding site.

Riboside-based nucleotides are subject to degly-cosylation reactions. Nonglycosidic substitution of the ribose moiety leading to greater chemical stability has recently been the focus of structure activity relationship (SAR) studies of nucleotide ligands for the P2Y1 receptor. For example, a dehydroanhydrohexitol (six-membered ring) analogue 8 was found to activate P2Y1 receptors with an EC50 value of 3.0 µM. N6-methylation of this derivative leads to P2Y1 receptor antagonism.

Carbocyclic and constrained carbocyclic rings have also been substituted in place of the ribose moiety. Some of the more useful examples of this approach are the methanocarba ring system28,29 used in place of the ribose moiety. This ring system features fused carbon rings (3 and 5 membered), which are constrained in either a northern (N) or southern (S) ring conformation depending on position of fusion of the two rings. Correlation of ring geometry with the biological activities has helped define that the binding site of the P2Y1 receptor prefers the (N) conformation of the ribose-like ring over the corresponding (S) conformation. For example, the (S)-isomer of ATP, MRS 2312 10, with an EC50 value of 7.2 µM, is pronouncedly less potent than the corresponding (N)-isomer MRS 2340 9, which displays an EC50 value of 52 nM at the human P2Y1 receptor.29 The enhancement of P2Y1 agonist potency on freezing the preferred conformation in a pseudoribose ring may approach 300 fold. An example of such an enhancement is (N)-methanocarba-β,γ – methylene-ATP, which is a full agonist with an EC50 value at the human P2Y1 receptor of 158 nM, whereas the corresponding riboside is a weak partial agonist. (N)-methanocarba-2-MeS-ADP, MRS 2365 11, with an EC50 value of 0.4 nM, is the most potent known agonist of the human P2Y1 receptor and is highly selective for that subtype versus P2Y12 receptors and other subtypes.30,31 Thus, compound 11 may be used for selective P2Y1 receptor activation in platelets.

graphic file with name nihms31395f2.jpg

The adenosine 5′-monophosphate analogue MRS2055, N 6-methyl-2-[(5-hexenyl)thio]-AMP, appears to activate the C6 glioma cell P2Y12 receptor considerably more potently than does the P2Y1 receptor (EC50 3.2 µM at the rat P2Y12 receptor versus > 100 µM at the turkey P2Y1 receptor).22,25

Antagonists

The introduction of potent nucleotide-derived antagonists of the P2Y1 receptor was made possible by the observation that naturally occurring adenosine bisphosphate derivatives such as A3P5P 12 are either partial agonists or antagonists of the receptor in various species.32 A later generation 2′-deoxy-N6-methyl derivative, MRS 2179 13 and the corresponding 2-chloro analogue MRS 2216 14 were found to be high-affinity antagonists of the P2Y1 receptor.28 Furthermore, MRS 2216 was shown to be inactive at the rat P2X1 receptor.33 In the riboside bisphosphate series of P2Y1 receptor antagonists, the 2-methyl and 2-ethyl substituents have been found to be particularly advantageous.34 At the N7 position of the riboside bisphosphates, the pattern of P2Y1 receptor affinity as a function of substitution is methyl > ethyl ≫ propyl, and larger alkyl groups or acylation (e.g., with benzoyl) lead to inactivity. Thus, there appears to be a small hydrophobic pocket at this position of the nucleotide binding site of the receptor. The (N)-methanocarbo equivalent of MRS 2216, that is, MRS 2279 15, was demonstrated to be a high-affinity competitive and selective antagonist at this subtype.3537 This antagonist competitively inhibited ADP-promoted aggregation of human platelets with a KB value of 8.9 nM.35 The high affinity of this analogue having a rigid (N)-methanocarba ring system, which has a 2′-endo envelope conformation, indicated the conformational preference in the antagonist binding site of the receptor. [33P]MRS 2179 and [3H]MRS 2279 have been introduced as the first generally useful high-affinity radioligands for the P2Y1 receptor in platelets and in other tissue.36,37 The selectivity of these bisphosphate derivatives for the P2Y1 receptor makes them attractive probes for pharmacological studies, with inactivity demonstrated at P2Y2,4,6,11,12,13 and P2X2,3,4,7 receptors.33,35 Weak antagonism was observed by compound 13, but not compound 14, of ion flux at the rat P2X1 receptor expressed in Xenopus oocytes.33 However, this activity may not be relevant to other pharmacological models, because many of the known P2 receptor antagonists are unusually potent in this assay. MRS2279 in micromolar concentrations was also found to antagonize the rat P2X1 receptor in the same electrophysiological model. Thus, for most applications, compound 13 and its congeners are essentially specific for the P2Y1 receptor. Recently, a highly potent P2Y1 receptor antagonist in the (N)-methanocarba series, MRS 2500 16, was reported (Ki = 0.78 nM at hP2Y1).38 This antagonist inhibited aggregation of human platelets with a median inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of 0.95 nM.39 Raboission et al40 have synthesized a C-nucleotide bisphosphate 17 that antagonized P2Y1 receptors.

In addition to the approach of rigidifying the ribose moiety in a conformation that approximates the conformation preferred in receptor binding, the opposite approach—using a flexible ribose equivalent—has met with some success. Acyclic nucleotide analogues of bisphosphate antagonists, such as MRS 2298 18 (IC50 0.48 µM at the turkey P2Y1 receptor), were found to be moderately potent P2Y1 receptor antagonists without residual agonism. The number of methylene groups adjacent to the adenine moiety in MRS 2298 (i.e., one) has been optimized. Chains longer than two methylene units in this series greatly reduced potency at the P2Y1 receptor. In addition, the introduction of steric constraints in the form of cyclopropyl rings and olefinic groups in the alkyl moiety failed to enhance antagonistic properties. An analogue related to MRS 2298, except that it contains the metabolically stable phosphonate groups in place of the phosphates, was MRS 2496 19. By antagonizing the P2Y1 receptor, compound 19 displayed an IC50 in the inhibition of aggregation of rat platelets of 0.68 µM.42 Curiously, nucleotides having a cyclic ribose equivalent may act as either P2Y1 agonist or antagonist, depending on substituent groups, whereas the acyclic structures have been found to act only as P2Y1 antagonists.

Moderately potent, nonnucleotide antagonists of the P2Y1 receptor are numerous although selectivity is generally less than with the nucleotide antagonists. The azo-linked pyridoxal phosphate derivative PPADS 20 is a mixed P2X/P2Y antagonist.43 Another nonselective P2 antagonist of mixed selectivity is the polysulfonate suramin,2 which inhibits P2X1 (IC50 1 µM), P2X2 (10 mM), P2X3 (3 µM), P2X5 (4 µM), P2Y2 (48 µM), and P2Y12 (4 µM) receptors. Certain analogues of PPADS 20, such as the nonsulfonated derivative MRS 2210 21, display selectivity for P2Y1 versus P2X sub-types.15 Compound 21 is a competitive antagonist of the human P2Y1 receptor, with a KB value derived by Schild analysis of 2.4 µM. A hybrid molecule SB9 22, consisting of PPADS- and suramin-like components, was found to potently antagonize P2Y1 receptors.44 Another large polysulfonated aromatic molecule, reactive blue 2, inhibited the human P2Y1 receptor with a KB value of 1.6 mM.15 Recently, a cyclic depsipeptide YM-254890 23, a fermentation product of a Chromobacterium isolated from soil, was found to potently antagonize P2Y1 receptors.45 Compound 23 inhibited the aggregation of platelets with an IC50 of 31 nM, and it was inactive at P2Y12 receptors. Derivatives of acid blue 129, such as compound 24, were also found to act as P2Y1 receptor antagonists.46,47

A variety of structurally diverse, non-nucleotide antagonists of the P2Y1 receptor have been shown to be noncompetitive inhibitors. For example, pyridyl isatogen tosylate (PIT) 46, which has been explored as a possible allosteric modulator of the receptor,48 was found to be a P2Y1-selective antagonist in recombinant P2Y receptors systems.49 It reduced the maximal effect of 2-MeSADP in stimulation of PLC with an IC50 of 0.14 mM but had no effect on the binding of [3H]MRS2279. MRS 2576 47, a diisothiocyanate derivative, was found to be a potent insurmountable (and possibly irreversible by virtue of the reactive isothiocyanate groups) antagonist of human P2Y1, as well as of other P2Y receptors.50 Covalent affinity labels of any receptor P2X or P2Y that bind with high affinity have yet to be developed.

Nucleotide antagonists of very high affinity for the platelet P2Y12 receptor are under development, including AR-C69931MX 25,51 which was already evaluated in clinical trials as an antithrombotic agent. A nucleotide in this series (AR-C67085MX 26) has been shown to potently activate the P2Y11 receptor.52 It has been possible to substitute the unwieldy triphosphate group in this series with uncharged moieties such as short alcohols, esters, and so on, thus proving that a highly anionic moiety is not needed for recognition by the P2Y12 receptor. This discovery led to compounds such as AZD6140 27, which is an orally active P2Y12 receptor antagonist of nM affinity that inhibits platelet aggregation up to 8 hours after administration.53 The presence of the 3,4-difluorophenyl group limits the metabolism of 27. According to our modeling studies,6 the 3,4-difluorophenyl ring of the N6-substituent of 27 formed an aromatic interaction with F77(2.48). A residue notation in the form X.XX useful for drawing analogy to the same position in other receptors was used.6 This residue was unique to P2Y12 and could be one of the reasons for the high P2Y12 selectivity of this antagonist.

graphic file with name nihms31395f3.jpg

Among non-nucleotide antagonists, reactive blue 2 is highly potent at the P2Y12 receptor with an IC50 of 25 nM.2 PPADS 20, however, is inactive at the P2Y12 receptor.

The action of the successful antithrombotic drug clopidogrel 28 (and its clinical predecessor ticlopidine, which is also a thienopyridine derivative) depends on the P2Y12 receptor present on platelets.54 During hepatic metabolism, compound 28 is transformed into a free thiol 29, which acts as an irreversible P2Y12 receptor antagonist. Thus, clopidogrel itself is not active in vitro and must be administered either intravenously or orally. The related compound, CS-747 30, also acts as a P2Y12 antagonist through a metabolite,55 The sulfonamide analog CT50547 31 has also been reported to antagonize the P2Y12 receptor.56 Other non-nucleotide antagonists of the P2Y12 receptor,57 especially those acting directly on the receptor, are currently the subject of high throughput screening efforts.

The acyclic scaffold (attached at the 9-position of adenine) used in the P2Y1 receptor antagonist MRS 2298 18 has been adapted to relatively weak antagonists of the P2Y12 receptor.42 Upon replacement of the two phosphate groups with hydrophobic esters, such as in the dipivaloate MRS 2395 32, the selectivity shifted entirely from the P2Y1 receptor to the P2Y12 receptor. MRS 2395 displayed an IC50 of 3.6 µM in the inhibition of ADP-induced aggregation of rat platelets. Because both receptor subtypes are integral to ADP-induced platelet aggregation, the inhibition of either P2Y1 or P2Y12 receptors impedes platelet aggregation. Analogues of ADP having neutral, hydrophobic substitutions at the ribose 2′- and 3′-hydroxyl groups and the adenine NH2 position were found to antagonize the P2Y12 receptor. One such analogue is INS 49266 33, which has the unusual feature of a urea group at the N6-position and an acetal group at the ribose hydroxyls; it displayed a KB of 361 nM in the inhibition of platelet aggregation.58 The agonist potencies of 33 at P2Y1 and P2Y2 receptors were > 10 and 14 µM, respectively.

P2X1 RECEPTOR LIGANDS

Agonists

Among the seven subtypes of P2X receptors, ATP is the most potent at the P2X1 receptor, with an EC50 value of 56 nM.2 One means of enhancing the stability of the triphosphate moiety of ATP and ADP derivatives is to substitute the bridge oxygen atoms with methylene and halomethylene units.21,59,60 In this capacity, the −CF2 bridge is a close electronic mimic of the oxygen bridge, based on the electron withdrawing properties of fluorine, which lower the pKa values of the resultant difluoro-methylene phosphonates.60 The methylene-bridged nucleotide α,β-meATP 34 distinguishes group I receptors, in other words, P2X1 and P2X3 receptors, which are activated by 34 (EC50 value 1 to 3 µM), from all other P2X subtypes, which are insensitive to this agonist.61 Another distinguishing feature is the ability of some P2X receptor subtypes (mainly group I) to desensitize rapidly in response to agonists such as 34, which has been used in pharmacological studies of the P2X1 receptor in place of true antagonists. At the P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors, α,β-meATP is inactive.

The nucleoside 5′-diphosphate and 5′-triphosphate derivatives generally diverge in activity at P2X subtypes.61 Although much weaker than ATP, ADP 2 elicits agonist action at the P2X1 receptor (EC50 10 µM) but not at other P2X subtypes.2 The P2X1 receptor is not activated by either AMP or by adenosine. Both α,β-methylene and β,γ-methylene, modifications of ATP, as well as the ω-thiophosphate group present in ATP-γ-S 35 generally increase stability of the triphosphate group toward enzymatic hydrolysis while maintaining potency at P2X1 receptors.61 The L-enantiomer of β,γ-methy-lene-ATP 36 activates rat P2X1 receptors with an EC50 value of 2 µM.61 The effect of ribose substitution in ATP analogues on potency at P2X receptors has not been fully explored. The derivative 2′-&3′-O-(4-benzoyl-benzoyl)-ATP (BzATP) 37, which is a mixture of ester species, is of nanomolar potency in activating the P2X1 receptor.62 At higher concentrations compound 37 also activates the P2X7 receptor, where it is one of the most potent agonists known. Adenine dinucleotides activate the P2X1 receptor.63 For example, the EC50 of Ap4A is 182 nM. Selective agonism by dinucleotides of group I P2X receptors (including P2X1) depends on a single adenine moiety63 Curiously, Ap4A and its more hydrolytically stable methylene-bridged and halomethylene-bridged analogues inhibit platelet aggregation.60

2-Alkylthio ethers of ATP, such as 2-[2-(4-nitro-phenylethylthio]-ATP (PAPET),22 retain agonist properties at the P2X1 receptor.33 HT-AMP 5 is a weak partial agonist (EC50 0.84 µM, about 50% efficacious) at the rat P2X1 receptor.33

Antagonists

Many of the “classic” antagonists of P2X receptors are highly charged polycyclic compounds. The trypanocidal drug suramin 37 and its derivatives were found to be P2X antagonists in the micromolar range. Suramin antagonism of P2 responses is readily reversible upon washout.63 This antagonist action was unrelated to the clinical use of suramin. The potency order of compound 37 at P2X receptors is P2X1, P2X5 (IC50 1 to 4 µM) > P2X2, P2X3 (10 to 15 µM) > P2X7 (78 µM) > P2X4, P2X6 (>500 µM). Lambrecht and coworkers64 have studied related, highly potent antagonists, selective for the P2X1 receptor, such as NF279 38 and NF449 39, which have roughly nanomolar IC50 values at the rat P2X1 receptor.65 The structure-activity relationship (SAR) in this polysulfonate series at the P2X1 receptor has been explored.66

graphic file with name nihms31395f4.jpg

The SAR of antagonists derived from pyridoxal phosphate, which were also introduced by Lambrecht and coworkers,64 have been explored at P2X receptors. The 2′,4′-disulfonate derivative PPADS 20 and its 2′,5′-disulfonate isomer “isoPPADS” 40 are somewhat more potent at P2X than they are at P2Y receptors. The pyridoxal phosphate derivative PPNDS 41 is a highly potent antagonist at the P2X1 receptor.64 The phosphate linkage of PPADS analogues may be replaced with more stable phosphonates.67 For example, the phosphonate analogue MRS 2257 42 is a highly potent antagonist at rat P2X1 (IC50 5.1 nM) receptors (with the receptors expressed in the Xenopus oocyte). Analogues in the PPADS series in which the diazo linkage has been replaced with carbon bridges have been synthesized.68 One such analogue, MRS 2335 43, was roughly equipotent to the corresponding diazo derivative at the P2X1 receptor. Although high potency at P2X receptors has been achieved for PPADS derivatives, a disadvantage is the noncompetitive binding they display, accompanied by slow on and off rates.68

Various nucleotide derivatives have also been found to antagonize the P2X1 receptor. Such nucleotide antagonists are advantageous because they display more favorable binding kinetic properties than do the polyanionic, non-nucleotide antagonists discussed previously. Faster on and off rates of binding faster than those of PPADS 20 have been demonstrated for the antagonist TNP-ATP 44, which binds potently to P2X1 and P2X3 receptors and to heteromeric P2X2/3 and P2X1/5 receptors.69 A dinucleotide derivative, Ip5I 45, potently antagonizes the P2X1 receptor.70

CONCLUSION

The three subtypes of P2 receptors present on platelets are among the most highly developed from the perspective of medicinal chemistry among the P2X and P2Y families. Each has potent and somewhat selective antagonists and a variety of potent agonists. Highly selective antagonists of P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors of nanometer affinity have been developed, largely as derivatives of agonist structures. The P2X1 receptor is rapidly desensitized by the action of potent nucleotide agonists, and directly acting competitive antagonists, such as polysulfonates, are also known. The development of even more potent and selective ligands for modulating platelet function is underway. Indirectly obtained structural knowledge (from sequence analysis, modeling, mutagenesis, and ligand docking) of the P2Y1 receptor has aided in the development of such ligands. A putative ligand binding site in the TM region and its specific recognition elements, such as positively charged Lys and Arg residues that serve as counterions to the negatively-charged phosphate group, have been identified.

Objectives: On completion of this article, the reader should be able to (1) understand the structure of the P2Y and P2X receptors on platelets, and (2) recognize the potential for the development of potent agonists and antagonists to these receptors.

Accreditation: Tufts University School of Medicine (TUSM) is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

Credit: TUSM designates this educational activity for a maximum of 1 Category 1 credit toward the AMA Physicians Recognition Award. Each physician should claim only those credits that he/she actually spent in the educational activity.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Kunapuli SP, Ding Z, Dorsam RT, et al. ADP receptors-targets for developing antithrombotic agents. Curr Pharm Des. 2003;9:2303–2316. doi: 10.2174/1381612033453947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jacobson KA, Jarvis MF, Williams M. Perspective: purine and pyrimidine (P2) receptors as drug targets. J Med Chem. 2002;45:4057–4093. doi: 10.1021/jm020046y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Leon C, Ravanat C, Freund M, Cazenave JP, Gachet C. Differential involvement of the P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors in platelet procoagulant activity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23:1941–1947. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000092127.16125.E6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jagroop IA, Burnstock G, Mikhailidis DP. Both the ADP receptors P2Y1 and P2Y12, play a role in controlling shape change in human platelets. Platelets. 2003;14:15–20. doi: 10.1080/0953710021000062914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hechler B, Lenain N, Marchese P, et al. A role of the fast ATP-gated P2X1 cation channel in thrombosis of small arteries in vivo. J Exp Med. 2003;198:661–667. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Costanzi S, Mamedova L, Gao ZG, Jacobson KA. Architecture of P2Y nucleotide receptors: structural comparison based on sequence analysis, mutagenesis, and homology modeling. J Med Chem. 2004;47:5393–5404. doi: 10.1021/jm049914c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hoffmann C, Moro S, Nicholas RA, Harden TK, Jacobson KA. The role of amino acids in extracellular loops of the human P2Y1 receptor in surface expression and activation processes. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:14639–14647. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.21.14639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Moro S, Guo D, Camaioni E, et al. Human P2Y1 receptor: molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis as tools to identify agonist and antagonist recognition sites. J Med Chem. 1998;41:1456–1466. doi: 10.1021/jm970684u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jiang Q, Guo D, Lee BX, et al. A mutational analysis of residues essential for ligand recognition at the human P2Y1 receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 1997;52:499–507. doi: 10.1124/mol.52.3.499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Palmer RK, Boyer JL, Schacter JB, Nicolas RA, Harden TK. Agonist action of adenosine triphosphates at the human P2Y1 receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;54:1118–1123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hollopeter G, Jantzen HM, Vincent D, et al. Identification of the platelet ADP receptor targeted by antithrombotic drugs. Nature. 2001;409:202–207. doi: 10.1038/35051599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Foster CJ, Prosser DM, Agans JM, et al. Molecular identification and characterization of the platelet ADP receptor targeted by thienopyridine antithrombotic drugs. J Clin Invest. 2001;107:1591–1598. doi: 10.1172/JCI12242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kim HS, Barak D, Harden TK, Boyer JL, Jacobson KA. Acyclic and cyclopropyl analogues of adenosine bisphosphate antagonists of the P2Y1 receptor: structure activity relationships and receptor docking. J Med Chem. 2001;44:3092–3108. doi: 10.1021/jm010082h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Palczewski K, Kumasaka T, Hori T, et al. Crystal structure of rhodopsin: A G protein-coupled receptor. Science. 2000;289:739–745. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5480.739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Guo D, Von Kügelegen I, Moro S, Kim YC, Jacobson KA. Evidence for the recognition of non-nucleotide antagonists within the transmembrane domains of the human P2Y1 receptor. Drug Dev Res. 2002;57:173–181. doi: 10.1002/ddr.10145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nicke A, Baumert HG, Rettinger J, et al. P2X1 and P2X3 receptors form stable trimers: a novel structural motif of ligand-gated ion channels. EMBO J. 1998;17:3016–3028. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.11.3016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brown S, Townsend-Nicholson A, Jacobson KA, Burnstock G, King BF. Heteromultimeric P2X1/2 receptors show a novel sensitivity to extracellular pH. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002;300:673–680. doi: 10.1124/jpet.300.2.673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ennion S, Ritson J, Evans RJ. Conserved negatively charged residues are not required for ATP action at P2X1 receptors. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;289:700–704. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.6034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Spelta V, Jiang LH, Bailey RJ, Surprenant A, North RA. Interaction between cysteines introduced into each transmembrane domain of the rat P2X2 receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 2003;138:131–136. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Egan TM, Cox JA, Voigt MM. Molecular structure of P2X receptors. Curr Top Med Chem. 2004;4:821–829. doi: 10.2174/1568026043451005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cusack NJ, Hourani SMO. Adenosine, adenine nucleotides, and platelet function. In: Phillis JW, editor. Adenosine and Adenine Nucleotides as Regulators of Cellular Function. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1991. pp. 121–131. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Marteau F, Le Poul E, Communi D, et al. Pharmacological characterization of the human P2Y13 receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 2003;64:104–112. doi: 10.1124/mol.64.1.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fischer B, Boyer JL, Hoyle CHV, et al. Identification of potent, selective P2Y–purinoceptor agonists: structure-activity relationships for 2-thioether derivatives of adenosine 5′-triphosphate. J Med Chem. 1993;36:3937–3946. doi: 10.1021/jm00076a023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bodor ET, Waldo GL, Hooks SB, et al. Purification and functional reconstitution of the human P2Y12 receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 2003;64:1210–1216. doi: 10.1124/mol.64.5.1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Boyer JL, Siddiqi S, Fischer B, et al. Identification of potent P2Y–purinoceptor agonists that are derivatives of adenosine 5′-monophosphate. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;118:1959–1964. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15630.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fischer B, Chulkin A, Boyer JL, et al. 2-thioether 5′-O-(1-thiotriphosphate) adenosine derivatives as new insulin secretagogues acting through P2Y–receptors. J Med Chem. 1999;42:3636–3646. doi: 10.1021/jm990158y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nahum V, Zundorf G, Levesque SA, et al. Adenosine 5′-O-(1-boranotriphosphate) derivatives as novel P2Y1 receptor agonists. J Med Chem. 2002;45:5384–5396. doi: 10.1021/jm020251d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nandanan E, Jang SY, Moro S, et al. Synthesis, biological activity, and molecular modeling of ribose-modified deoxy-adenosine bisphosphate analogues as P2Y1 receptor ligands. J Med Chem. 2000;43:829–842. doi: 10.1021/jm990249v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kim HS, Ravi RG, Marquez VE, et al. Methanocarba modification of uracil and adenine nucleotides: high potency of northern ring conformation at P2Y1, P2Y2, or P2Y4 and P2Y11, but not P2Y6 receptors. J Med Chem. 2002;45:208–218. doi: 10.1021/jm010369e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ravi RG, Kim HS, Servos J, et al. Adenine nucleotide analogues locked in a northern methanocarba conformation: enhanced stability and potency as P2Y1 receptor agonists. J Med Chem. 2002;45:2090–2100. doi: 10.1021/jm010538v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chhatriwala M, Ravi RG, Patel RI, et al. Induction of novel agonist selectivity for the ADP-activated P2Y1 receptor versus the ADP-activated P2Y12 and P2Y13 receptors by conformational constraint of an ADP analogue. J Pharmacol Exp Therap. 2004;311:1038–1043. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.068650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Boyer JL, Romero-Avila T, Schachter JB, Harden TK. Identification of competitive antagonists of the P2Y1-receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 1996;50:1323–1329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Brown SG, King BF, Kim YC, Burnstock G, Jacobson KA. Activity of novel adenine nucleotide derivatives as agonists and antagonists at recombinant rat P2X receptors. Drug Dev Res. 2000;49:253–259. doi: 10.1002/1098-2299(200004)49:4<253::AID-DDR4>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mathieu R, Baurand A, Schmitt M, Gachet C, Bourguignon JJ. Synthesis and biological activity oif 2-alkylated deoxyade-nosine bisphosphate derivatives as P2Y1 receptor antagonists. Bioorg Med Chem. 2004;12:1769–1779. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2003.12.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Boyer J, Adams M, Ravi RG, Jacobson KA, Harden TK. 2-chloro N6-methyl-(N)-methanocarba-2′-deoxyadenosine-3′ ,5′ -bisphosphate is a selective high affinity P2Y1 receptor antagonist. Br J Pharmacol. 2002;135:2004–2010. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Waldo GL, Corbitt J, Boyer JL, et al. Quantitation of the P2Y1 receptor with a high affinity radiolabeled antagonist. Mol Pharmacol. 2002;62:1249–1257. doi: 10.1124/mol.62.5.1249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Baurand A, Raboisson P, Freund M, et al. Inhibition of platelet function by administration of MRS2179, a P2Y1 receptor antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001;412:213–221. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)00733-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kim HS, Ohno M, Xu B, et al. 2-Substitution of adenine nucleotide analogues containing a bicyclo[3.1.0]hexane ring system locked in a Northern conformation: Enhanced potency as P2Y1 receptor antagonists. J Med Chem. 2003;46:4974–4987. doi: 10.1021/jm030127+. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cattaneo M, Lecchi A, Joshi BV, et al. Antiaggregatory activity in human platelets of potent antagonists of the P2Y1 receptor. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;68:1995–2002. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.06.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Raboisson P, Baurand A, Cazenave JP, et al. A general approach toward the synthesis of C-nucleoside pyrazolo[1,5-a]-1,3,5-triazines and their 3′,5′ -bisphosphate C-nucleotide analogues as the first reported in vivo stable P2Y1-receptor antagonists. J Org Chem. 2002;67:8063–8071. doi: 10.1021/jo026268l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kim HS, Barak D, Harden TK, Boyer JL, Jacobson KA. Acyclic and cyclopropyl analogues of adenosine bisphosphate antagonists of the P2Y1 receptor: structure activity relationships and receptor docking. J Med Chem. 2001;44:3092–3108. doi: 10.1021/jm010082h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Xu B, Stephens A, Kirschenheuter G, et al. Acyclic analogues of adenosine bisphosphates as P2Y receptor antagonists: phosphate substitution leads to multiple pathways of inhibition of platelet aggregation. J Med Chem. 2002;45:5694–5709. doi: 10.1021/jm020173u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Charlton SJ, Brown CA, Weisman GA, et al. PPADS and suramin as antagonists at cloned P2Y- and P2U–purinocep-tors. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;118:704–710. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15457.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lambrecht G, Ganso M, Baumert HG, et al. The novel heteromeric bivalent ligand SB9 potently antagonizes P2Y1 receptor-mediated responses. J Auton Nerv Syst. 2000;81:171–177. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1838(00)00135-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Taniguchi M, Nagai K, Arao N, et al. YM-254890, a novel platelet aggregation inhibitor produced by Chromobacterium sp. QS3666. J Antibiot. 2003;56:358–363. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.56.358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Glänzel M, Bültmann R, Starke K, Frahm AW. Members of the acid blue 129 family as potent and selective P2Y–receptor antagonists. Drug Dev Res. 2003;59:64–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Brown J, Brown CA. Evaluation of reactive blue 2 derivatives as selective antagonists for P2Y receptors. Vascul Pharmacol. 2002;39:309–315. doi: 10.1016/s1537-1891(03)00030-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.King BF, Dacquet C, Ziganshin AU, et al. Potentiation by 2,2′ -pyridylisatogen tosylate of ATP-responses at a recombinant P2Y1 purinoceptor. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;117:1111–1118. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb16704.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gao ZG, Mamedova L, Tchilibon S, Gross AS, Jacobson KA. 2,2′ -pyridylisatogen tosylate antagonizes P2Y1 receptor signaling without affecting nucleotide binding. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;68:231–237. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.02.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mamedova L, Joshi BV, Gao ZG, von Kügelgen I, Jacobson KA. Diisothiocyanate derivatives as potent, insurmountable antagonists of P2Y6 nucleotide receptors. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;67:1763–1770. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ingall AH, Dixon J, Bailey A. Antagonists of the platelet P2T receptor: a novel approach to antithrombotic therapy. J Med Chem. 1999;42:213–220. doi: 10.1021/jm981072s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Communi D, Robaye B, Boeynaems JM. Pharmacological characterization of the human P2Y11 receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 1999;128:1199–1206. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Springthorpe B. From ATP to AZD6140: design of an orally active P2Y12 (P2T) receptor antagonist for the treatment of thrombosis. New Orleans, LA. Paper presented at: 225th ACS National Meeting, Division of Medicinal Chemistry; 2003. Mar, pp. 23–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Savi P, Pereillo JM, Uzabiaga MF, et al. Identification and biological activity of the active metabolite of clopidogrel. Thromb Haemost. 2000;84:891–896. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sugidachi A, Asai F, Yoneda K, et al. Antiplatelet action of R-99224, an active metabolite of a novel thienopyridine-type Gi-linked P2T antagonist, CS-747. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;132:47–54. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Scarborough RM, Laibelman AM, Clizbe LA, et al. Novel tricyclic benzothiazolo [2,3-c] thiadiazine antagonists of the platelet ADP receptor (P2Y12) Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2001;11:1805–1808. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(01)00313-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fretz H, Houille O, Hilpert K, Peter O, Breu V, et al. SanDiego, CA. Novel pyrazolidine-3,5-dione derivatives are P2Y12 receptor antagonists and inhibit ADP-triggered blood platelet aggregation Paper presented at: American Chemical Society 229th National Meeting.2005. Mar 13, [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Douglass J, Patel RI, Redick C, et al. Ribose and nucleobase modifications to nucleotides that confer antagonist properties against the P2Y12 platelet receptor. Haematologica. 2002;87(suppl 1):22. abst. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cusack NJ, Hourani SMO. Structure activity relationships for adenine nucleotide receptors on mast cells, human platelets, and smooth muscle. In: Jacobson KA, Daly JW, Manganiello V, editors. Purines in Cellular Signalling: Targets for New Drugs. New York: Springer; 1990. pp. 254–259. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zamecnik PC, Kim B, Gao MJ, Taylor G, Blackburn GM. Analogues of diadenosine 5′,5′-P1,P4-tetraphosphate (Ap4A) as potential anti-platelet-aggregation agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:2370–2373. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.6.2370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.King BF. Molecular biology of P2X purinoreceptors. In: Burnstock G, Dobson JG Jr, Liang BTJ, Linden J, editors. Cardiovascular Biology of Purines. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998. pp. 159–186. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Bianchi BR, Lynch KJ, Touma E, et al. Pharmacological characterization of recombinant human and rat P2X receptor subtypes. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999;376:127–138. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00350-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cinkilic O, King BF, van der Giet M, et al. Selective agonism of group I P2X receptors by dinucleotides dependent on a single adenine moiety. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001;299:131–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lambrecht G, Braun K, Damer M, et al. Structure-activity relationships of suramin and pyridoxal-5′-phosphate derivatives as P2 receptor antagonists. Curr Pharm Des. 2002;8:2371–2399. doi: 10.2174/1381612023392973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Braun K, Rettinger J, Ganso M, Kassack M, et al. NF449: a subnanomolar potency antagonist at recombinant rat P2X1 receptors. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2001;364:285–290. doi: 10.1007/s002100100463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kassack MU, Braun K, Ganso M, et al. Structure-activity relationships of analogues of NF449 confirm NF449 as the most potent and selective known P2X1 receptor antagonist. Eur J Med Chem. 2004;39:345–357. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2004.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kim YC, Brown SG, Harden TK, et al. Structure-activity relationships of pyridoxal phosphate derivatives as potent and selective antagonists of P2X1 receptors. J Med Chem. 2001;44:340–349. doi: 10.1021/jm9904203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Brown SG, Kim YC, Kim SA, et al. Actions of a series of PPADS analogs at P2X1 and P2X3 receptors. Drug Dev Res. 2001;53:281–291. doi: 10.1002/ddr.1197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Surprenant A, Schneider DA, Wilson HL, Galligan JJ, North RA. Functional properties of heteromeric P2X(1/5) receptors expressed in HEK cells and excitatory junction potentials in guinea-pig submucosal arterioles. J Auton Nerv Syst. 2000;81:249–263. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1838(00)00123-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.King BF, Liu M, Pintor J, et al. Diinosine pentaphosphate (IP5I) is a potent antagonist at recombinant rat P2X1 receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 1999;128:981–988. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES