Background: Accurate segregation of antibiotic resistance plasmids requires dedicated centromere-binding proteins.
Results: Assembly of the hydrophobic core of the ParG centromere-binding protein encoded by multiresistance plasmid TP228 is governed by a triad of key amino acids.
Conclusion: ParG retains functionality with certain substitutions of the core triad.
Significance: The study provides valuable insights into how multiresistance plasmids are maintained in bacteria.
Keywords: antibiotic resistance, Escherichia coli (E. coli), microbiology, plasmid, protein folding, centromere-binding protein, ribbon-helix-helix
Abstract
The ribbon-helix-helix (RHH) superfamily of DNA-binding proteins is dispersed widely in procaryotes. The dimeric RHH fold is generated by interlocking of two monomers into a 2-fold symmetrical structure that comprises four α-helices enwrapping a pair of antiparallel β-strands (ribbon). Residues in the ribbon region are the principal determinants of DNA binding, whereas the RHH hydrophobic core is assembled from amino acids in both the α-helices and ribbon element. The ParG protein encoded by multiresistance plasmid TP228 is a RHH protein that functions dually as a centromere binding factor during segrosome assembly and as a transcriptional repressor. Here we identify residues in the α-helices of ParG that are critical for DNA segregation and in organization of the protein hydrophobic core. A key hydrophobic aromatic amino acid at one position was functionally substitutable by other aromatic residues, but not by non-aromatic hydrophobic amino acids. Nevertheless, intramolecular suppression of the latter by complementary change of a residue that approaches nearby from the partner monomer fully restored activity in vivo and in vitro. The interactions involved in assembling the ParG core may be highly malleable and suggest that RHH proteins are tractable platforms for the rational design of diverse DNA binding factors useful for synthetic biology and other purposes.
Introduction
The mechanisms of bacterial DNA segregation are best described for low copy number plasmids. Three principal segregation complexes have been characterized. Each comprises a cis-acting centromere site that is bound by a centromere-binding protein, which in turn interacts with a polymerizing NTPase that drives plasmid movement (1–4). In the case of the actin-like ParM protein, ATP-mediated polymerization separates and pushes plasmid pairs to opposite cell halves (5). In contrast, the tubulin homologue TubZ assembles into filaments upon GTP binding. Concomitant growth and disassembly of opposite ends of these filaments (treadmilling) induces the directional displacement of attached plasmids (6–8). However, the most widely distributed plasmid partition NTPases are those of the ParA superfamily. Numerous ParA homologues have been shown to polymerize in response to ATP binding. Polymerization is modulated by the partner centromere-binding protein and/or by DNA (9–25). Significantly, mutation of residues at the polymer interface disrupts both polymerization and segregation (26). Nevertheless, unlike with actin- and tubulin-based complexes, the mechanism that underpins ParA-mediated plasmid partitioning remains elusive, although the nucleoid may act as a substratum on which segregation occurs (17, 27–31).
The partition complex of multidrug resistance plasmid TP228 comprises the ParA homologue, ParF; the ParG centromere-binding factor; and, the parH centromere site (32, 33). The N-terminal tail of ParG is intrinsically unstructured whereas the C-terminal domain adopts a ribbon-helix-helix (RHH)3 fold (34). The RHH superfamily of DNA-binding proteins is dispersed widely in bacteria and archaea. The dimeric RHH fold involves the interweaving of two monomers into a 2-fold symmetrical structure composed of four α-helices surrounding a pair of antiparallel β-strands (ribbon) (Fig. 1A). Amino acids that comprise the ribbon region are the major determinants of DNA binding, with three hydrophilic residues in particular making a set of base-specific contacts in the major groove (35, 36). Extensive sequence variability in the ribbon element permits diverse RHH proteins to interact with discrete DNA sequences (37). In the case of ParG, the ribbon recognizes an array of degenerate tetramer boxes interspersed by AT-rich spacers both in the parH centromere, and at the operator site during transcriptional repression of the parF-parG genes (33, 38).
FIGURE 1.
Alanine-scanning mutagenesis of ParG. A, tertiary structure of the ParG RHH domain (34) (1P94.pdb). α-Helices and β-strands are colored blue and yellow, respectively. The flexible N-terminal tails are truncated for clarity. This figure and Fig. 6, A and D were made using PyMol (70). B, primary sequence of ParG with secondary structure elements shown beneath. C, plasmid partition assays with ParG derivatives carrying alanine mutations in α1 and α2. Results are means of at least three independent tests with typical standard deviations of ∼10%. Blue and gray bars indicate amino acids located in α-helical and non-α helical regions, respectively. Residues Phe-49, Trp-71, and Leu-72 are highlighted with arrows in panels B and C.
The assembly of a linear polypeptide into a folded, compact structure is governed principally by hydrophobic interactions. These interactions sequester hydrophobic surface area from external solvating water thereby providing an increase in entropy and tight packing of the protein interior (39). The hydrophobic core of dimeric RHH proteins is formed by residues located in both the α-helices and β-strand elements. In particular, seven conserved branched hydrophobic residues, four in the α-helices and three in the β-strand, in both monomers are implicated in organizing the RHH core (37). In view of the important role of ParG in stable maintenance of a multiresistance plasmid, here we characterize positions in the α-helices that are especially crucial for ParG function in segregation and in assembly of the protein core. A hydrophobic aromatic amino acid at one of these positions was functionally replaceable by other aromatic residues, but not by non-aromatic hydrophobic amino acids. Nevertheless, intramolecular suppression of the latter by a compensatory change to a residue that approaches nearby from the partner monomer restored activity in vivo and in vitro. The data suggest that the hydrophobic interactions involved in assembling the ParG core are highly tractable. Combined with recent observations that the ribbon element that determines DNA binding by ParG is functionally interchangeable with ribbons from other RHH factors (40), ParG and other RHH proteins may be potent platforms for the rational design of compact transcription factors valuable for synthetic biology and other purposes.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Bacterial Strains and Growth
E. coli DH5α (F− endA1 hsdR17 (rK− mK+) supE44 thi-1 recA1 gyrA96 (Nalr) relA1 deoR Φ80lacZΔM15 Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169) (41) was used for plasmid propagation and transformation. BR825 is a polA host used for plasmid segregation assays (42). Two-hybrid assays were performed with E. coli SP850 (λ− e14− spoT1 Δ(cya1400::kan) thi-1), which carries a 200 bp deletion within the cya gene (43). Strain BL21(DE3) (F− omp hsdSB (rB−mB−) gal dcm) (44) was used for protein overproduction. Strains were grown in Luria-Bertani broth supplemented with appropriate antibiotics (ampicillin, 100 μg/ml; or chloramphenicol, 10 μg/ml).
Plasmids
Plasmid pFH547 comprises the parFGH cassette of multiresistance plasmid TP228 cloned in the plasmid partition vector, pFH450 (32). Site-specific mutations in parG were constructed in pFH547 by cassette mutagenesis (45) or by overlap extension PCR (46). Mutated genes additionally were amplified from pFH547-based plasmids and cloned in pT18 and pT25 two-hybrid vectors (47) and in the pET22–22b(+) expression vector (Novagen) as described previously (48). Mutations in all cases were verified by sequencing.
Plasmid Segregation Assays
Segregation assays were conducted using pFH547 derivatives that replicate at low copy number in strain BR825 as detailed elsewhere (32). Briefly plasmid-bearing strains were grown for ∼25 generations without chloramphenicol selective pressure. Plasmid retention was determined by replica plating colonies to LB agar medium with and without antibiotic. Results are means of at least three independent tests with typical standard deviations of ∼10%.
Two-hybrid Assays
Two-hybrid assays were based on reconstitution of two subunits, T18 and T25, that confer adenylate cyclase activity in E. coli (47). Plasmid pairs producing fusions of these subunits with either wild-type or mutated ParG were cotransformed in strain SP850. Interactions were monitored by β-galactosidase assays on cultures grown at 30 °C for ∼16 h. Results are means of at least three independent tests with typical standard deviations <10%.
Protein Purification and Analysis
Wild-type and mutant ParG were purified as His-tagged proteins as described previously using pET22b(+) expression plasmids (48). Cross-linking experiments with dimethyl pimelimidate (DMP; 10 mm) were performed as outlined elsewhere (48). Size exclusion chromatography coupled to multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALLS) was used to determine the average mass of ParG proteins eluting from a Superdex-75 10/300 column (GE Life Sciences). Proteins (200 μl) were loaded onto the column in 10 mm Tris, 50 mm KCl, pH 7.5 typically at concentrations >150 μm. The samples passed through a Wyatt Helios multi-angle detector, rEX differential refractive index detector, QELS (for the simultaneous analysis of diffusion) and UV detectors before being collected. Data were analyzed using a modified Zimm plot using a 2nd-degree polynomial fit and an estimated dn/dc of 0.18 ml/g within the program Astra version 5.3.4. Sedimentation equilibrium analysis was performed in a Beckman XLA analytical ultracentrifuge. Mid-peak fractions from SEC-MALLS were pooled and diluted in buffer (10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mm KCl) to give three concentrations typically in the range of 10, 25, and 100 μm. Samples were loaded into 6-sector Epon centerpieces and centrifuged at running speeds of 20,000, 30,000, and 45,000 rpm and then scanned at 280 nm after 14 h. The molar extinction coefficients used were 5000 and 16800, respectively, and a vbar of 0.72 ml/g was used in all cases. Data were analyzed globally with the Sedfit/Sedphat suite of programs (49, 50) using a monomer-dimer equilibrium model.
Gel Retardation Assays
The parH centromere site (33) was amplified from pFH547 using one primer bearing a 5′-biotin label and a second unlabeled primer. Conditions for DNA binding, gel electrophoresis, and detection of labeled DNA using the LightShift chemiluminescent EMSA kit (Pierce) were described previously (48).
RESULTS
A Triad of α-Helix Residues Are Critical for ParG-mediated Plasmid Segregation
The folded C-terminal domain of ParG comprises a single hydrophobic core formed by the symmetrical intertwining of a pair of monomers into a RHH fold (34). Molecular hydrophobicity potential (MHP) previously was used to calculate the strength of each inter-residue contact in ParG. First, by comparing the MHP contact plots and contribution of individual amino acid side-chains of ParG, interprotomer contacts were revealed to be stronger than intraprotomer contacts. Second, the analysis suggested that the strongest hydrophobic contacts within the α-helical region that hold the ParG dimer together potentially are formed by the side-chains of amino acid residues Lys-45, Arg-48, and Phe-49 in α-helix 1 (α1) and Val-64, Leu-67, Val-68, Trp-71, and Leu-72 in α-helix 2 (α2) (Fig. 2A) (34).
FIGURE 2.
Charge properties of the ParG protein. A, surface area change on dimerization calculated for residues 43–76 of ParG. The strongest hydrophobic contacts within the α-helical region predicted by MHP are indicated by stars for comparison (34). B, contribution of charge-charge interactions to ParG dimerization. Calculations of charge-charge interactions were made with pKa calculations based on Debye-Hückel modeling of interactions between ionizable group sites, in water dielectric, at ionic strength 0.15 m (71). The calculations were done with the dimer structure in which each monomer is taken from the dimer. Unfavorable contributions to dimerization that occur upon intertwining partly account for the addition of charge-charge and buried non-polar surface in the dimer summing to more than the observed association. There also is scope for charges to re-arrange when in the monomer state such that favorable interactions are made that are not necessarily apparent in the dimer.
The contribution of each side-chain in the α-helices to the surface area change on dimerization was calculated (Fig. 2A). Trp-71 is most prominent, followed by non-polar sidechains Leu-72, Leu-67, and Val-68. Certain charged side-chains, e.g. Lys-45 and Arg-48, also contributed to the surface area change. However, charged side-chains are likely to be more flexible than non-polar side-chains, which makes it difficult to assess their importance to dimerization solely from a surface area change plot. Therefore, the contribution of charge-charge interactions to dimerization was computed at neutral pH when aspartic acid and glutamate are negatively charged and lysine and arginine are positive (Fig. 2B). The value of ∼30 kJ/mol suggests that charge interactions in the α-helices indeed play a role in ParG dimerization. However, this calculation of the electrostatic contribution to dimerization is likely to be an overestimate. Since dimerization is coupled to folding in the RHH superfamily (51), a calculation based on monomers with the same structure exhibited in the dimer lacks the (likely favorable) re-organization of charge-charge interactions in the unfolded monomers, in turn over-estimating the dimerization energy. Because of uncertainty in the monomer state structure, calculations were made with a simple Debye-Hückel model for charge-charge interactions, neglecting the desolvation penalties that are associated with partial charge burial at interfaces. This contribution would also lower the contribution of charge-charge interactions to dimerization. Nevertheless, some charged amino acids that interact across the dimer interface do exhibit a fall in activity (e.g. Lys-73), but not to the same degree as some amino acids bearing non-polar side-chains. This general picture of non-polar groups contributing the bulk of binding energy to protein-protein interactions is well known (52). Furthermore, it has become clear that a relatively small number of mostly non-polar groups, termed hot spots, typically are dominant (53, 54), and that it is possible to predict such residues (55, 56). In the current work, a relatively simple analysis of changes in solvent accessible surface area (for non-polar groups) is indicative of binding hot spots, even in a system where monomer folding is coupled to dimerization, and thus the relevant surface areas for the monomer form are unclear. It appears sufficient for predicting their importance to dimerization that the key residues make extensive non-polar interactions in the dimer, and will contribute substantially to the experimental Kd (∼1.0 μm) previously determined for the protein (48). With respect to charge-charge interactions at the dimer interface, while they do not figure in binding hot spots, it is possible that modulation of charge patterns could contribute to specificity in homo- and hetero-interactions in the RHH family, as seen for the Arc repressor (57).
Amino acids 43-to-56 and 60-to-74 comprise α1 and α2, respectively, in ParG (34; Fig. 1B). These residues, the intervening three residue loop, and the two C-terminal amino acids were subjected to alanine-scanning mutagenesis (58) to assess further their contribution to ParG function and organization of the hydrophobic core. Alanine residues at positions 51, 52, and 54 were converted to glycine. Mutations were constructed in plasmid pFH547 that contains the complete parFGH cassette in a partition probe vector (32) to permit assessment of the effect of the alterations on plasmid segregation in E. coli. Repeated attempts to make the K50A mutation in this context using different mutagenesis strategies were unsuccessful, although this alteration was introduced straightforwardly into parG cloned in the absence of parF and parH. ParG-K50A may cause cellular toxicity when produced in conjunction with ParF and parH.
Partition tests revealed that certain alanine substitutions in ParG, including of Thr-47, Ala-52, and Asn-70, exerted partial defects in segregation activity (Fig. 1C). However, the most deleterious effects on segregation were induced by the F49A mutation in α1 and the W71A and L72A mutations in α2 which reduced plasmid retention to the level of the empty vector (Fig. 1C). Thus, residues Phe-49, Trp-71, and Leu-72 are crucial for ParG function in segregation. Interestingly, the outcomes of the mutational studies are congruent with the MHP analysis and surface area change calculations outlined above that implicated residues Phe-49, Trp-71, and Leu-72, among others, in strong contacts that maintain the ParG hydrophobic core. Phe-49 shows less change in solvent accessible surface area upon dimerization than Trp-71 and Leu-72 (Fig. 2) and is integral to the monomer core, whereas Trp-71 and Leu-72 instead are crucial for the dimer core.
The Contribution of Phe-49, Trp-71, and Leu-72 to ParG Dimerization in Vivo
ParG dimerization can be monitored in two-hybrid assays based on reconstitution of adenylate cyclase activity in E. coli (48, 59). The interaction efficiency in this assay can be assessed semi-quantitatively by β-galactosidase production (47). Fusion of wild-type ParG to the T18 and T25 subunits of adenylate cyclase generated ∼4000 β-galactosidase units indicative of ParG dimerization. Introduction of the F49A, W71A, or L72A mutations into the fusions reduced β-galactosidase values ∼2-fold indicating that the mutations perturbed ParG self-association (Fig. 3A, filled bars).
FIGURE 3.

Functional analysis of ParG mutants carrying alanine mutations in α1 and α2. A, effects of alanine mutations on ParG dimerization assessed in two-hybrid assays. Fusions of wild-type or mutant ParG proteins to the T18 and T25 subunits of adenylate cyclase were tested in E. coli SP850. The effects of the mutations were examined both in full-length ParG (filled bars) and in versions lacking 30 residues from the mobile N-terminal tail (open bars). Results are means of at least three independent tests with typical standard deviations <10%. B, gel retardation analysis of wild-type and mutant ParG proteins with the biotinylated parH centromere in vitro. Open and filled arrows indicate unbound DNA and ParG-DNA complexes, respectively. ParG concentrations (μm monomer, left to right): 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8.
The N-terminal mobile tails in ParG are crucial for partition function, for stimulation of ATPase activity in the ParF partner protein, for modulating ParF polymerization dynamics, and for correct binding both to the parH centromere and during transcriptional autoregulation of the parF-parG cassette (13, 33, 59). Residues 20–30 of the N-terminal tail of ParG have a propensity to form a β-strand structure that interacts transiently with the β-sheet DNA recognition element of the folded domain to give an extended β-sheet, providing two additional short-lived antiparallel β-strands per ParG dimer (59). Although the flexible tail is not necessary for ParG dimerization (59), the Δ30ParG derivative that lacks 30 amino acids from the N terminus (Fig. 1B) showed a modest reduction in β-galactosidase values in the two-hybrid assay compared with full-length ParG (Fig. 3A, open bars). This may reflect that the RHH fold is destabilized in the absence of the N-terminal tail that includes the transient β-strand element. Moreover, the F49A, W71A, and L72A mutations in the Δ30ParG context reduced β-galactosidase activity almost to basal levels confirming the importance of these residues for ParG dimerization (Fig. 3A, open bars).
The contribution of Phe-49, Trp-71, and Leu-72 to ParG Dimerization in Vitro
The self-association properties of purified ParG-F49A, -W71A, and -L72A proteins were characterized and compared with those of wild-type ParG. First, dimers of wild-type ParG in solution are captured efficiently by the cross-linking reagent DMP and subsequently migrate as intense ∼20 kDa species in denaturing gels (48). The formation of detectable cross-linked species was abolished entirely by the W71A and L72A mutations, whereas very weak dimerization was evident with ParG-F49A (Fig. 4A). Second, size exclusion chromatography coupled to multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALLS) was performed for wild-type and mutant ParG proteins to determine their oligomeric state (Fig. 4B). Wild-type ParG has an average molecular mass of ∼21 kDa with the mass across the peak seemingly homogeneous which is indicative of a single species, in this case a dimer (9,933 Da monomer). The mutant proteins eluted significantly later, with the exception of ParG-F49A. The most destabilized mutants, ParG-W71A and ParG-L72A, exhibited both a later elution and a lower average mass across the peak representative of their destabilizing effect.
FIGURE 4.
Effects of mutations on ParG dimerization in vitro. A, cross-linking of wild-type and mutant ParG proteins was performed without (−) and with (+) DMP (10 mm) for 60 min at 37 °C. Reactions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE as outlined elsewhere (48). M, PageRulerTM Prestained Protein Ladder (Pierce) with apparent molecular masses (kDa) of selected proteins shown at the left. Open and filled arrows denote monomeric and dimeric species, respectively. B, size exclusion chromatography coupled to multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALLS) of wild-type and mutant ParG proteins. The peaks are the change in refractive index as the proteins eluted from a Superdex-75 10/300 column. A range within each peak was selected for molar mass calculations which are superimposed on the plot. Wild-type ParG (filled circles), ParG-W71A (filled squares), ParG-L72A (filled triangles), ParG-F49A (open circles), and ParG-A52Y-W71L (open squares). C, sedimentation equilibrium of wild-type and mutant ParG proteins showing the equilibrium positions of the proteins in the cell at of 20,000, 30,000, and 45,000 rpm. The residuals are of fits to a monomer-dimer model, which reveals natural logarithms of the molar equilibrium constants (lnKa) of 6.28, 4,81, 4.41, 3.87, and 5.00 for wild-type ParG, ParG-W71A, ParG-L72A, ParG-F49A, and ParG-A52Y-W71L, respectively, which are equivalent to dissociation constants of 0.52, 15, 39, 140, and 10 μm. The centrifugation cells each contain three separate wells as a consequence of which the radii differ between the selected wells.
Third, sedimentation equilibrium analysis of wild-type and mutant ParG proteins was performed. Experiments were accomplished at three rotor speeds (20,000, 30,000, and 45,000 rpm) scanning at 280 nm after 14 h. Three different protein concentrations were tested in each case, typically in the range of 10, 25, and 100 μm. Absorbance values were plotted as functions of radial position. Representative sedimentation profiles of wild-type ParG and mutant proteins are shown in Fig. 4C. ParG had an average molecular mass of 20,910 ± 200 Da, which agrees well with the expected mass (19,866 Da). ParG-F49A, -W71A, and -L72A had average molecular masses of 19,500 ± 1,600, 16,370 ± 2,600, and 16,200 ± 700 Da, respectively, that display a progressive tendency toward monomer values. Previous sedimentation equilibrium analysis of wild-type ParG showed best fitting to a monomer-dimer model with a Kd of ∼1.0 μm (48). This agrees closely with the current analysis that indicates a Kd of 0.52 μm for ParG. In contrast, ParG-F49A, -W71A, and -L72A had Kd values of 15, 39, and 140 μm, respectively, confirming that the mutations markedly attenuated dimerization. In summary, two-hybrid, chemical cross-linking, SEC-MALLS and sedimentation equilibrium studies unequivocally demonstrated that residues Phe-49, Trp-71, and Leu-72 play crucial roles in assembly of the hydrophobic core that mediates ParG dimerization.
The parH centromere (∼100-bp) consists of an array of degenerate tetramer boxes interspersed by AT-rich spacers. The ParG protein at high concentrations assembles the site into a single, major complex in gel retardation assays (33). The effects of the F49A, W71A, and L72A mutations on centromere binding by ParG were examined. Purified ParG-F49A and ParG-W71A did not bind detectably to parH and ParG-L72A bound the site only weakly at the highest protein concentrations tested (Fig. 3B). Thus, mutations that disrupted critical hydrophobic contacts in α1 and α2 impaired the ParG-centromere interaction. These observations correlate with previous studies, which demonstrated that the integrity of the α-helical backbone is fundamental for DNA binding by RHH proteins (37, 60).
Restoration of ParG Dimerization and Function
Numerous ParG homologues from diverse bacterial species are identifiable in protein databases. Alignment of 282 of these proteins revealed considerable diversity in the amino acids at positions 49, 71, and 72 that were shown above to be crucial for maintenance of the ParG hydrophobic core. Nevertheless, positions 49 and 72 favor hydrophobic residues. In particular, leucine and phenylalanine occur frequently at both positions 49 (36.2 and 27.3%, respectively) and 72 (45.4 and 20.6%, respectively). Hydrophobic amino acids also dominate at position 71 (31.2% tyrosine, 11.3% tryptophan, 8.9% leucine, 6.4% alanine, and 3.5% phenylalanine) with the exception of the polar, negatively charged glutamic acid, which is also present at high frequency (22.7%) (Fig. 5A). Although hydrophobic amino acids commonly occupy position 71 in ParG homologues, one of the most prevalent residues, alanine, was shown above to be unable to substitute functionally for Trp-71 in the prototypical ParG under study here. The capacity of the other most abundant hydrophobic residues at position 71, leucine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine, to functionally replace tryptophan at this position also was tested. Plasmids producing ParG-W71F, -W71L, or -W71Y were examined both in segregation and two-hybrid assays. The W71L change reduced plasmid retention to the level of the vector lacking the parFGH cassette (Fig. 5B), and also exerted a major impact on ParG self-association in vivo (Fig. 5C). In contrast, plasmids encoding ParG derivatives in which residue Trp-71 was replaced by other hydrophobic aromatic residues, i.e. tyrosine or phenylalanine, were partitioned as efficiently as the plasmid producing the wild-type protein (Fig. 5B). Values for homodimerization of either ParG-W71F or ParG-W71Y assessed in two-hybrid assays were intermediate between those for self-association of wild-type ParG and ParG-W71L (Fig. 5C). In summary, hydrophobic aromatic residues (tyrosine and phenylalanine), but not other hydrophobic amino acids (alanine and leucine), can functionally replace Trp-71 for ParG-mediated plasmid segregation.
FIGURE 5.
A, amino acid frequencies at positions 49, 52, 71 and 72 in ParG homologues. The data were generated using a sequence alignment of 282 ParG homologues and are arranged in descending order according to amino acid abundance at position 71. Frequencies of residues at positions 49, 52, and 72 are included for comparison. The color scheme used is: orange (non polar, aromatic), white (non polar, aliphatic), blue (polar, positive side-chain), red (polar, negative side-chain), green (polar, neutral hydrophilic), cream and indigo (special cases). B, plasmid partition assays with ParG derivatives carrying mutations at position 71. Results are means of at least three independent tests with typical standard deviations of ∼10%. C, effects of mutations at position 71 on ParG dimerization assessed in two-hybrid assays. Fusions of wild-type or mutant ParG proteins to the T18 and T25 subunits of adenylate cyclase were tested in E. coli SP850. Results are means of at least three independent tests with typical standard deviations <10%.
Intramolecular Suppression of the ParG-W71L Mutation
The Trp-71 side-chain in α2 of one monomer in ParG approaches within 3.47 Å of the Ala-52 side-chain in α1 of the second monomer (Fig. 6A). Twenty-six of 32 homologues that possess Trp-71 (Fig. 5A) contain Ala-52, including the protoypical ParG under study here. Interestingly, the A52G change in ParG reduced segregation activity (Fig. 1C) further emphasizing that the Trp-71—Ala-52 interaction is vital for maintenance of the protein hydrophobic core. Although the W71L alteration abolished ParG-mediated partition function (Fig. 5B), Leu-71 is not uncommon among ParG homologues (Fig. 5A). Intriguingly, 22 of the 25 homologues with Leu-71 possess tyrosine at position 52. Thus, the Ala-52—Trp-71 and Tyr-52—Leu-71 combinations found in numerous ParG homologues comprise a hydrophobic aromatic residue paired with a non-polar residue, albeit in opposing positions within the dimer core.
FIGURE 6.
Intramolecular suppression of the ParG-W71L mutation. A, close-up view of one side of the ParG dimer showing locations of residues Ala-52, Gln-66, and Trp-71. The RHH fold in ParG is made by two intertwined, symmetrical monomer chains (A and B) each of which contributes a β-strand and two α-helices (Fig. 1A). The C-terminal end α1 of chain A is in blue, and the central portion of the two α-helices of chain B are in yellow. The side-chains of residues Ala-52, Gln-66, and Trp-71 are drawn as sticks. The interaction shown between Trp-71 of chain A and Ala-52 of chain B is necessary for packing of the ParG hydrophobic core. The side-chain of Trp-71 projects from α2 of chain A toward the center of the dimer. The side-chain of Ala-52 that projects from α1 of chain B is also oriented toward the dimer center, whereas the side-chain of Gln-66 from α2 of the same chain is close to Trp-71 but not toward the dimer center. Elements in each residue are colored in green (carbon), blue (nitrogen), gray (hydrogen), and red (oxygen). B, cross-linking of ParG-W71L and ParG-A52Y-W71L was performed without (−) and with (+) DMP (10 mm) for 60 min at 37 °C. Reactions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE as outlined elsewhere (48). Open and filled arrows indicate monomeric and dimeric species. C, gel retardation analysis of ParG-W71L and ParG-A52Y-W71L with the biotinylated parH centromere in vitro. Open and filled arrows indicate unbound DNA and ParG-DNA complexes, respectively. ParG concentrations (μm monomer, left to right): 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8. D, ribbon representations of ParG and mutant proteins illustrating locations of residues 71 and 52 in wild-type ParG and modeled in ParG-W71Y, ParG-W71F and ParG-A52Y-W71L. Chains A and B are shown in blue and yellow, respectively. Side-chains of Tyr-52, Phe-71, Leu-71, Trp-71, and Tyr-71 are shown as spheres. Elements in each residue are colored in green (carbon), blue (nitrogen), gray (hydrogen) and red (oxygen).
To ascertain whether Tyr-52—Leu-71 could substitute functionally for Ala-52—Trp-71 and thereby suppress the W71L change, the A52Y-W71L double mutation was introduced into the canonical ParG under study here. ParG-A52Y-W71L self-associated strongly in two-hybrid (Fig. 5C) and cross-linking assays (Fig. 6B). Moreover, the mutant protein eluted with an average molecular weight of 20,430 ± 800 Da in SEC-MALLS analysis (Fig. 4B), which is very similar to the value described above for wild-type dimeric ParG (20,910 ± 200 Da) indicating no major shift in molar mass for the double mutant protein. The Kd for ParG-A52Y-W71L determined from sedimentation equilibrium studies (Fig. 4C) was 10 μm compared with 0.52 μm for the wild-type protein. Notwithstanding the higher Kd value, ParG-A52Y-W71L supported plasmid partition as effectively as wild-type ParG (Fig. 5B). Furthermore, whereas ParG-W71L displayed impaired binding to the parH centromere, ParG-A52Y-W71L showed a similar gel retardation pattern as the wild-type protein (Fig. 6C). In summary, the A52Y mutation suppresses the dimerization, plasmid segregation and centromere binding defects elicited by the W71L mutation in ParG. Thus, the Ala-52—Trp-71 and Tyr-52—Leu-71 combinations that comprise a hydrophobic aromatic residue paired with a non-polar residue in opposing positions are functionally interchangeable in ParG suggesting that the hydrophobic core that forms the monomer-monomer interface in the protein is highly malleable.
DISCUSSION
A vital early step in the stable segregation of multiresistance, virulence, and other low copy number plasmids involves centromere recognition by a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein. Centromere-binding factors that possess either helix-turn-helix or RHH motifs have been defined (4). ParG is among the most well studied of the latter type and is composed of a C-terminal RHH-folded domain attached to a pair of flexible N-terminal tails (34). The parH centromere that is recognized by ParG comprises a set of degenerate tetramer motifs separated by AT-rich spacers (33). ParG also is a transcriptional repressor of the parF-parG cassette which is achieved by binding to a second array of tetramer boxes upstream of the genes (38). Like other RHH proteins, ParG recognizes DNA via the antiparallel β-strands that comprise the ribbon element. This element can be replaced by ribbons from other RHH factors producing hybrid proteins that possess the DNA binding characteristics associated with the swapped ribbon (40). Moreover, ParG recruits the ParF protein to the segrosome and additionally modulates its nucleotide hydrolysis and polymerization properties (9, 13, 14, 25, 26, 48, 59).
In view of the multifunctionality of ParG and its vital role in the stable maintenance of a multiresistance plasmid, the residues within the α-helix backbone that are key for segregation activity of ParG were defined here. Mutations in the three-residue loop that connects α1 with α2 and in the two C-terminal amino acids also were tested. Among these thirty-three residues, only Phe-49 in α1 and Trp-71 and Leu-72 in α2 were functionally intolerant of alanine substitutions and thus crucial for full segregation activity. The Kd values associated with these mutations were 30–280-fold higher than the value for the wild-type protein indicating that mutation of Phe-49, Trp-71, or Leu-72 disrupts folding and/or stability of ParG. Phe-49, Trp-71, and Leu-72 cluster together: the side-chain of Leu-72 is within 3.94 Å of the side-chain of Trp-71, which in turn is 3.81 Å from Phe-49 (Fig. 1A). This triad may act as a clamp that maintains the integrity of the RHH hydrophobic core. Interestingly, ParG derivatives in which residue Trp-71 was replaced by other hydrophobic aromatic residues were fully active in plasmid segregation. These substitutions are not expected to perturb the interactions that maintain the conformation of the ParG core (Fig. 6D).
The Arc protein of Salmonella bacteriophage P22 is a transcriptional autorepressor and also regulates expression of the gene for the antirepressor protein, Ant. The folding kinetics and hydrophobic core organization of Arc are the best characterized among RHH proteins (61). The root mean square deviation of Cα atom positions for the folded domains between ParG and the Arc repressor is 1.67 Å indicating that the structures are closely related (34). Comprehensive alanine scanning mutagenesis of Arc revealed that approximately half of the mutations exerted significant effects on the protein's equilibrium stability, unfolding, or refolding (60, 62, 63). Phe-49, Trp-71, and Leu-72 that were shown here to be crucial for plasmid segregation and dimerization by ParG correspond to positions Val-22, Ser-44, and Phe-45, respectively, in Arc (34). Mutations of Val-22 and Phe-45 are among the most destabilizing of all the alanine changes in Arc. The side-chains of these two residues, along with those of Glu-36, Ile-37, and Val-41, pack together tightly into a cluster from which the Arc protein is assembled (62). Accordingly, the E36A, I37A, and V41A mutations also are highly destabilizing (61). Val-63, Val-64, and Val-68 are the equivalent residues in ParG. MHP analysis previously suggested that the side-chains of Val-64 and Val-68 form some of the strongest hydrophobic contacts within the α-helical region that hold the ParG dimer together (34). However, only the V63A alteration among these three residues exerted any detectable effect on ParG-mediated plasmid segregation (Fig. 1C). This observation does not preclude that alanine mutation of residues Val-63, Val-64, and Val-68 causes destabilizing, but tolerable, effects on ParG function.
The ω protein is a RHH factor involved in segregation of plasmid pSM19035 (64, 65) and thus, like Arc, is a structural homologue of ParG (34). Double alanine mutations of the residues equivalent to Arg-48 and Phe-49 or Val-68 and Leu-72 in ParG reduced, but did not abolish, heterodimerization of ω with the wild-type protein in two-hybrid assays in E. coli (66). Although double mutations were analyzed, the data suggest that residues equivalent to Phe-49 and Leu-72 in ParG also are important for assembly of the hydrophobic core and dimerization of ω (66).
Residue Trp-71 in ParG was functionally replaceable by other hydrophobic aromatic residues, i.e. phenylalanine or tyrosine, but not by non-aromatic hydrophobic amino acids, i.e. alanine or leucine. ParG-W71L was severely impaired in dimerization, segregation activity, and centromere binding. However, these defects associated with the W71L change were suppressed fully by an alanine-to-tyrosine change at position 52. The A52Y-W71L compensatory change was engineered based, first, on the observation that Tyr-52—Leu-71 pairs occur in numerous ParG homologues and, second, that the side-chain at position 52 in α1 of one ParG monomer closely approaches that of residue 71 in α2 of the second monomer. The Kd values suggest a 4-fold increase in tightness of the ParG-A52Y-W71L dimer compared with ParG-W71L. Although the Kd of the ParG-A52Y-W71L variant was noticeably higher than that of the wild-type protein, the double mutation is expected to maintain the organization of the ParG hydrophobic core (Fig. 6D). Thus, the ParG core may be able to accommodate a variety of appropriate hydrophobic aromatic residues paired with non-polar residues at positions 52 and 71 (Fig. 5A). Interestingly, numerous double and multiple mutations in Arc also retained partial or full stability and/or biological functionality (67–69). Moreover, the ribbon element that dictates centromere recognition by ParG can be functionally replaced by ribbons from other RHH proteins (40). These observations highlight that RHH proteins may be tractable scaffolds for the rational design of DNA-binding factors with altered specificity and dimerization properties. Finally, improved understanding of the folding and assembly of ParG and other proteins that are necessary for the segregation of multiresistance plasmids will provide insights into whether the partition apparatus is a viable target for novel anti-plasmid compounds.
Acknowledgment
We thank Massimiliano Zampini for assistance in alignment studies with ParG homologues.
Footnotes
- RHH
- ribbon-helix-helix
- DMP
- dimethyl pimelimidate
- SEC-MALLS
- size exclusion chromatography coupled to multi-angle light scattering.
REFERENCES
- 1. Hayes F., Barillà D. (2006) The bacterial segrosome: a dynamic nucleoprotein machine for DNA trafficking and segregation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 133–143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hayes F., Barillà D. (2010) in Bacterial Chromatin (Dorman C. J., Dame R. T., ed) Extrachromosomal components of the nucleoid: recent developments in deciphering the molecular basis of plasmid segregation, pp. 49–70, Springer Publishing, Dordrecht, The Netherlands [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sengupta M., Austin S. (2011) Prevalence and significance of plasmid maintenance functions in the virulence plasmids of pathogenic bacteria. Infect. Immun. 79, 2502–2509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Schumacher M. A. (2012) Bacterial plasmid partition machinery, a minimalist approach to survival. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 22, 72–79 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Salje J., Gayathri P., Löwe J. (2010) The ParMRC system: molecular mechanisms of plasmid segregation by actin-like filaments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 683–692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Larsen R. A., Cusumano C., Fujioka A., Lim-Fong G., Patterson P., Pogliano J. (2007) Treadmilling of a prokaryotic tubulin-like protein, TubZ, required for plasmid stability in Bacillus thuringiensis. Genes Dev. 21, 1340–1352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ni L., Xu W., Kumaraswami M., Schumacher M. A. (2010) Plasmid protein TubR uses a distinct mode of HTH-DNA binding and recruits the prokaryotic tubulin homolog TubZ to effect DNA partition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 11763–11768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Barillà D. (2010) One-way ticket to the cell pole: plasmid transport by the prokaryotic tubulin homolog TubZ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 12061–12062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Barillà D., Rosenberg M. F., Nobbmann U., Hayes F. (2005) Bacterial DNA segregation dynamics mediated by the polymerizing protein ParF. EMBO J. 24, 1453–1464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Leonard T. A., Butler P. J., Löwe J. (2005) Bacterial chromosome segregation: structure and DNA binding of the Soj dimer - a conserved biological switch. EMBO J. 24, 270–282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lim G. E., Derman A. I., Pogliano J. (2005) Bacterial DNA segregation by dynamic SopA polymers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 17658–17663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ebersbach G., Ringgaard S., Møller-Jensen J., Wang Q., Sherratt D. J., Gerdes K. (2006) Regular cellular distribution of plasmids by oscillating and filament-forming ParA ATPase of plasmid pB171. Mol. Microbiol. 61, 1428–1442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Barillà D., Carmelo E., Hayes F. (2007) The tail of the ParG DNA segregation protein remodels ParF polymers and enhances ATP hydrolysis via an arginine finger-like motif. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 1811–1816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Machón C., Fothergill T. J. G., Barillà D., Hayes F. (2007) Promiscuous stimulation of ParF protein polymerization by heterogeneous centromere binding factors. J. Mol. Biol. 374, 1–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hatano T., Yamaichi Y., Niki H. (2007) Oscillating focus of SopA associated with filamentous structure guides partitioning of F plasmid. Mol. Microbiol. 64, 1198–1213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bouet J. Y., Ah-Seng Y., Benmeradi N., Lane D. (2007) Polymerization of SopA partition ATPase: regulation by DNA binding and SopB. Mol. Microbiol. 63, 468–481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pratto F., Cicek A., Weihofen W. A., Lurz R., Saenger W., Alonso J. C. (2008) Streptococcus pyogenes pSM19035 requires dynamic assembly of ATP-bound ParA and ParB on parS DNA during plasmid segregation. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 3676–3689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Batt S. M., Bingle L. E., Dafforn T. R., Thomas C. M. (2009) Bacterial genome partitioning: N-terminal domain of IncC protein encoded by broad-host-range plasmid RK2 modulates oligomerisation and DNA binding. J. Mol. Biol. 385, 1361–1374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ringgaard S., van Zon J., Howard M., Gerdes K. (2009) Movement and equipositioning of plasmids by ParA filament disassembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 19369–19374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Dunham T. D., Xu W., Funnell B. E., Schumacher M. A. (2009) Structural basis for ADP-mediated transcriptional regulation by P1 and P7 ParA. EMBO J. 28, 1792–1802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ditkowski B., Troć P., Ginda K., Donczew M., Chater K. F., Zakrzewska-Czerwińska J., Jakimowicz D. (2010) The actinobacterial signature protein ParJ (SCO1662) regulates ParA polymerization and affects chromosome segregation and cell division during Streptomyces sporulation. Mol. Microbiol. 78, 1403–1415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hui M. P., Galkin V. E., Yu X., Stasiak A. Z., Stasiak A., Waldor M. K., Egelman E. H. (2010) ParA2, a Vibrio cholerae chromosome partitioning protein, forms left-handed helical filaments on DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 4590–4595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Banigan E. J., Gelbart M. A., Gitai Z., Wingreen N. S., Liu A. J. (2011) Filament depolymerization can explain chromosome pulling during bacterial mitosis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kalliomaa-Sanford A. K., Rodriguez-Castañeda F. A., McLeod B. N., Latorre-Roselló V., Smith J. H., Reimann J., Albers S. V., Barillà D. (2012) Chromosome segregation in Archaea mediated by a hybrid DNA partition machine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 3754–3759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Dobruk-Serkowska A., Caccamo M., Rodríguez-Castañeda F., Wu M., Bryce K., Ng I., Schumacher M. A., Barillà D., Hayes F. (2012) Uncoupling of nucleotide hydrolysis and polymerization in the ParA protein superfamily disrupts DNA segregation dynamics. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 42545–42553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Schumacher M. A., Ye Q., Barge M. T., Zampini M., Barillà D., Hayes F. (2012) Structural mechanism of ATP-induced polymerization of the partition factor ParF: implications for DNA segregation. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 26146–26154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Ebersbach G., Gerdes K. (2001) The double par locus of virulence factor pB171: DNA segregation is correlated with oscillation of ParA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 15078–15083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Castaing J. P., Bouet J. Y., Lane D. (2008) F plasmid partition depends on interaction of SopA with non-specific DNA. Mol. Microbiol. 70, 1000–1011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Hatano T., Niki H. (2010) Partitioning of P1 plasmids by gradual distribution of the ATPase ParA. Mol. Microbiol. 78, 1182–1198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Vecchiarelli A. G., Han Y. W., Tan X., Mizuuchi M., Ghirlando R., Biertümpfel C., Funnell B. E., Mizuuchi K. (2010) ATP control of dynamic P1 ParA-DNA interactions: a key role for the nucleoid in plasmid partition. Mol. Microbiol. 78, 78–91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hwang L. C., Vecchiarelli A. G., Han Y. W., Mizuuchi M., Harada Y., Funnell B. E., Mizuuchi K. (2013) ParA-mediated plasmid partition driven by protein pattern self-organization. EMBO J. 32, 1238–1249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hayes F. (2000) The partition system of multidrug resistance plasmid TP228 includes a novel protein that epitomizes an evolutionarily-distinct subgroup of the ParA superfamily. Mol. Microbiol. 37, 528–541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Wu M., Zampini M., Bussiek M., Hoischen C., Diekmann S., Hayes F. (2011) Segrosome assembly at the pliable parH centromere. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 5082–5097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Golovanov A. P., Barillà D., Golovanova M., Hayes F., Lian L. Y. (2003) ParG, a protein required for active partition of bacterial plasmids, has a dimeric ribbon-helix-helix structure. Mol. Microbiol. 50, 1141–1153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Somers W. S., Phillips S. E. (1992) Crystal structure of the met repressor-operator complex at 2.8 Å resolution reveals DNA recognition by β-strands. Nature 359, 387–393 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Raumann B. E., Rould M. A., Pabo C. O., Sauer R. T. (1994) DNA recognition by β-sheets in the Arc repressor-operator crystal structure. Nature 367, 754–757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Schreiter E. R., Drennan C. L. (2007) Ribbon-helix-helix transcription factors: variations on a theme. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 710–720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Zampini M., Derome A., Bailey S. E. S., Barillà D., Hayes F. (2009) Recruitment of the ParG segregation protein to different affinity DNA sites. J. Bacteriol. 191, 3832–3841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Jain R. K., Ranganathan R. (2004) Local complexity of amino acid interactions in a protein core. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 111–116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Zampini M., Hayes F. (2012) Combinatorial targeting of ribbon-helix-helix artificial transcription factors to chimeric recognition sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 6673–6682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Hanahan D. (1985) in DNA Cloning, (Glover D. M., ed) pp. 109–135, Vol.1, IRL Press, Oxford, UK [Google Scholar]
- 42. Ludtke D. N., Eichorn B. G., Austin S. J. (1989) Plasmid partition functions of the P7 prophage. J. Mol. Biol. 209, 393–406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Shah S., Peterkofsky A. (1991) Characterization and generation of Escherichia coli adenylate cyclase deletion mutants. J. Bacteriol. 173, 3238–3242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Studier F. W., Moffatt B. A. (1986) Use of bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase to direct selective high-level expression of cloned genes. J. Mol. Biol. 189, 113–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Wells J. A., Vasser M., Powers D. B. (1985) Cassette mutagenesis: an efficient method for generation of multiple mutations at defined sites. Gene 34, 315–323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Higuchi R., Krummel B., Saiki R. (1988) A general method of in vitro preparation and specific mutagenesis of DNA fragments: study of protein and DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 16, 7351–7367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Karimova G., Pidoux J., Ullmann A., Ladant D. (1998) A bacterial two-hybrid system based on a reconstituted signal transduction pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 5752–5756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Barillà D., Hayes F. (2003) Architecture of the ParF-ParG protein complex involved in prokaryotic DNA segregation. Mol. Microbiol. 49, 487–499 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Schuck P. (2000) Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and Lamm equation modeling. Biophys. J. 78, 1606–1619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Vistica J., Dam J., Balbo A., Yikilmaz E., Mariuzza R. A., Rouault T. A., Schuck P. (2004) Sedimentation equilibrium analysis of protein interactions with global implicit mass conservation constraints and systematic noise decomposition. Anal. Biochem. 326, 234–256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Robinson C. R., Rentzeperis D., Silva J. L., Sauer R. T. (1997) Formation of a denatured dimer limits the thermal stability of Arc repressor. J. Mol. Biol. 273, 692–700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Chothia C., Janin J. (1975) Principles of protein-protein recognition. Nature 256, 705–708 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Cunningham B. C., Wells J. A. (1993) Comparison of a structural and a functional epitope. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 554–563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Clackson T., Wells J. A. (1995) A hot spot of binding energy in a hormone-receptor interface. Science 267, 383–386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Kortemme T., Baker D. (2002) A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 14116–14121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Guerois R., Nielsen J. E., Serrano L. (2002) Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. J. Mol. Biol. 320, 369–387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Nohaile M. J., Hendsch Z. S., Tidor B., Sauer R. T. (2001) Altering dimerization specificity by changes in surface electrostatics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 3109–3114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Cunningham B. C., Wells J. A. (1989) High-resolution epitope mapping of hGH-receptor interactions by alanine-scanning mutagenesis. Science 244, 1081–1085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Carmelo E., Barillà D., Golovanov A. P., Lian L. Y., Derome A., Hayes F. (2005) The unstructured N-terminal tail of ParG modulates assembly of a quaternary nucleoprotein complex in transcription repression. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 28683–28691 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Brown B. M., Milla M. E., Smith T. L., Sauer R. T. (1994) Scanning mutagenesis of the Arc repressor as a functional probe of operator recognition. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1, 164–168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Sauer R. T., Milla M. E., Waldburger C. D., Brown B. M., Schildbach J. F. (1996) Sequence determinants of folding and stability for the P22 Arc repressor dimer. FASEB J. 10, 42–48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Milla M. E., Brown B. M., Sauer R. T. (1994) Protein stability effects of a complete set of alanine substitutions in Arc repressor. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1, 518–523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Milla M. E., Brown B. M., Waldburger C. D., Sauer R. T. (1995) P22 Arc repressor: transition state properties inferred from mutational effects on the rates of protein unfolding and refolding. Biochemistry 34, 13914–13919 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Murayama K., Orth P., de la Hoz A. B., Alonso J. C., Saenger W. (2001) Crystal structure of ω transcriptional repressor encoded by Streptococcus pyogenes plasmid pSM19035 at 1.5 Å resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 314, 789–796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Lioy V. S., Pratto F., de la Hoz A. B., Ayora S., Alonso J. C. (2010) Plasmid pSM19035, a model to study stable maintenance in Firmicutes. Plasmid 64, 1–17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Dmowski M., Jagura-Burdzy G. (2011) Mapping of the interactions between partition proteins Delta and Omega of plasmid pSM19035 from Streptococcus pyogenes. Microbiology 157, 1009–1020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Bowie J. U., Sauer R. T. (1989) Identifying determinants of folding and activity for a protein of unknown structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 2152–2156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Milla M. E., Sauer R. T. (1995) Critical side-chain interactions at a subunit interface in the Arc repressor dimer. Biochemistry 34, 3344–3351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Waldburger C. D., Schildbach J. F., Sauer R. T. (1995) Are buried salt bridges important for protein stability and conformational specificity? Nat. Struct. Biol. 2, 122–128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Delano W. L. (2001) The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, DeLano Scientific LLC, San Carlos, CA, U.S.A. [Google Scholar]
- 71. Warwicker J. (1999) Simplified methods for pKa and acid pH-dependent stability estimation in proteins: removing dielectric and counterion boundaries. Protein Sci. 8, 418–425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





