Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2015 May 22;282(1807):20142371. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2371

Unexpected evolutionary diversity in a recently extinct Caribbean mammal radiation

Selina Brace 1,, Samuel T Turvey 2,, Marcelo Weksler 3,4, Menno L P Hoogland 5, Ian Barnes 1,
PMCID: PMC4424637  PMID: 25904660

Abstract

Identifying general patterns of colonization and radiation in island faunas is often hindered by past human-caused extinctions. The insular Caribbean is one of the only complex oceanic-type island systems colonized by land mammals, but has witnessed the globally highest level of mammalian extinction during the Holocene. Using ancient DNA analysis, we reconstruct the evolutionary history of one of the Caribbean's now-extinct major mammal groups, the insular radiation of oryzomyine rice rats. Despite the significant problems of recovering DNA from prehistoric tropical archaeological material, it was possible to identify two discrete Late Miocene colonizations of the main Lesser Antillean island chain from mainland South America by oryzomyine lineages that were only distantly related. A high level of phylogenetic diversification was observed within oryzomyines across the Lesser Antilles, even between allopatric populations on the same island bank. The timing of oryzomyine colonization is closely similar to the age of several other Caribbean vertebrate taxa, suggesting that geomorphological conditions during the Late Miocene facilitated broadly simultaneous overwater waif dispersal of many South American lineages to the Lesser Antilles. These data provide an important baseline by which to further develop the Caribbean as a unique workshop for studying island evolution.

Keywords: ancient DNA, biogeography, extinct mammal, island evolution, Oryzomyini, phylogeny

1. Introduction

Island systems and the unusual endemic faunas that often occur on them represent important ‘natural laboratories’ that have played a key part in the development of evolutionary thought since the nineteenth century [1,2]. In particular, the dynamics of island colonization events, the factors that determine the pattern and magnitude of adaptive radiations, and the geography of gene flow in relation to different environmental barriers have all become the subject of extensive research [35]. Island species are also particularly vulnerable to human-mediated extinction due to factors such as a lack of native mammalian predators on most oceanic islands, and a substantial proportion of endemic insular biodiversity (especially vertebrate biodiversity) has been lost following human arrival in different island systems [69].

Central to our capacity to derive general patterns of colonization, radiation and extinction in island systems is the ability to compare across multiple organismal groups. The insular Caribbean has excellent potential in this context, as it is one of the only oceanic-type island systems to have been colonized by non-volant land mammals. The Caribbean Late Quaternary land mammal fauna was characterized by major evolutionary radiations of endemic lipotyphlan insectivores, megalonychid sloths, platyrrhine primates and several families of often large-bodied rodents [9,10]. Subsequently, the region has witnessed the highest level of mammalian species extinction anywhere in the world during the prehistoric Holocene and post-1500 ad historical era [912], and from a Late Quaternary fauna containing more than 100 endemic mammals, only two insectivore species and eight currently recognized capromyid rodent species are probably extant [13,14].

However, reconstructing the evolutionary history of the many island clades that now lack any surviving representatives can be extremely challenging, and this may pose a major barrier to understanding fundamental evolutionary patterns and processes in insular systems. Here, we present the first molecular data from one of the Caribbean region's now-extinct major mammal groups: the insular radiation of oryzomyine rice rats (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae). These are the only native non-volant mammals known from across most of the Lesser Antilles, and are part of an extremely diverse New World rodent radiation containing 28 extant genera and roughly 130 currently recognized extant species [1517]. Caribbean oryzomyines are now only represented by highly degraded skeletal material from archaeological or palaeontological sites, or by museum specimens (more than 100 years old) of historically live-caught individuals.

Although abundant in the Late Quaternary fossil record and in Holocene pre-Columbian archaeological sites throughout the main Windward–Leeward island chain (figure 1), Caribbean oryzomyine diversity remains unclear. Around 20 separate insular populations, some of which reached the size of small cats [18], have been recorded from different islands between Grenada and the Anegada Passage [19,20]. All of these populations are now extinct, probably as a result of European-era introduction of invasive mammals or agricultural habitat conversion [18]; this dramatic level of extinction is equivalent in magnitude to the much more widely known major historical-era loss of marsupials and rodents in Australia [9,11]. However, only six oryzomyine species (including two endemic genera, Megalomys and Pennatomys, and a representative of the mainland Neotropical genus Oligoryzomys on the southern island of St Vincent) have so far been formally described from the Windward–Leeward island chain [19,20].

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Map showing the distribution of described species of extinct Lesser Antillean oryzomyine rice rats. Starred islands indicate those from which oryzomyine samples used in this study were collected.

Colonization scenarios and intra- and interisland species groupings proposed by previous authors have suggested that oryzomyine taxa from the main Windward–Leeward island chain constitute either a monophyletic clade or separate evolutionary radiations [19,21,22]. Uncertainty also remains over whether oryzomyines reached South America before complete formation of the Isthmus of Panama that facilitated the Great American Biotic Interchange [23,24], and whether their Late Holocene distribution was modified by accidental or deliberate translocation between islands by Amerindians during recent prehistory, a dispersal mechanism which also played an important role in shaping historical distributions of other terrestrial vertebrates in the Lesser Antilles (e.g. iguanas, agoutis, opossums) [25].

Here, we reconstruct oryzomyine colonization of the insular Caribbean and the dynamics of their subsequent evolutionary history. Our specific aims are to determine: (i) whether oryzomyines colonized the main Windward–Leeward island chain north of St Vincent via either a single or multiple waif dispersal events; (ii) levels of phylogenetic diversity, and thus the scale of the subsequent Late Holocene extinction event, shown by oryzomyines across this complex island chain; and (iii) the timing of oryzomyine colonization, diversification and adaptation across the region, particularly in relation to known geological events and prehistoric arrival of Amerindian settlers. This study also has the broader goal of generating new insights into the evolutionary history and Quaternary diversity of the Caribbean mammal fauna, and the wider dynamics of mammalian island colonization events.

2. Material and methods

(a). DNA extraction and amplification

We sampled a total of 42 oryzomyine samples from 10 Lesser Antillean islands (table 1). DNA extractions followed protocols described in [26] and were carried out in a dedicated ancient DNA (aDNA) laboratory at Royal Holloway University of London. Mitochondrial DNA (MtDNA) were amplified in multiple overlapping fragments, averaging 110 base pairs (bp) each, using a total of 18 primer pairs (electronic supplementary material, table S1), targeting a 560 bp region of cytochrome b (cyt b). All amplifications were repeated (more than two times), sequenced through Sanger and NGS, and sequence data were translated to detect potential NUMTs and miscoding legions. PCR reactions, amplicon purification, Sanger sequencing and protocols to prevent contamination were performed as described in [26].

Table 1.

Samples of Lesser Antillean extinct oryzomyines investigated for mtDNA analyses. All samples are from pre-Columbian zooarchaeological sites except for two historical (nineteenth-century) soft-tissue samples of Megalomys desmarestii (Martinique) and M. luciae (St Lucia). BMHS, Barbados Museum and Historical Society; LU, Leiden University; MNHN, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (Paris); NHM, Natural History Museum (London; mammalogy collections); UF, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida (zooarchaeology comparative collections); US, University of Southampton; UW, University of Washington; YPM, Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History.

taxon island site material no. samples source
undescribed Antigua Indian Creek bone 5 YPM
Megalomys georginae Barbados Silver Sands bone 2 BMHS
undescribed Carriacou Sabazan bone 2 UW
undescribed Guadeloupe Anse à la Gourde bone 5 LU
undescribed Marie Galante Taliseronde bone 5 UF
Megalomys desmarestii Martinique Paquemar bone 3 UF
Megalomys desmarestii Martinique unknown (nineteenth-century wild-caught) dried tissue 1 NHM
Pennatomys nivalis Nevis Hichmans bone 4 US
Pennatomys nivalis St Eustatius Golden Rocks bone 7 UF
Pennatomys nivalis St Kitts Sugar Factory Pier bone 7 UF
Megalomys luciae St Lucia unknown (nineteenth-century wild-caught) dried tissue 1 MNHN

(b). Library construction and NGS sequencing

For each of the eight samples that successfully amplified mtDNA, the PCR products (four to nine amplicons per sample) were pooled to an equimolar concentration. Libraries for these eight multi-amplicon samples were constructed using a previously described protocol [27] with the following modifications: the initial DNA fragmentation step was not required; all clean-up steps used MinElute PCR purification kits; Buffer Tango and ATP were replaced with 0.1 mg ml BSA and 1 × T4 DNA ligase buffer during the blunt-end repair step; the proceeding clean-up step was replaced by an inactivation step, heating to 75°C for 10 min; 0.5 mM ATP replaced the T4 DNA Ligase buffer during the adapter ligation step. The index PCR step followed a further protocol using Pfu Turbo Cx and the addition of 0.4 mg ml BSA [28]. The index PCR was set for 20 cycles with three PCR reactions conducted per library. The eight indexed libraries were diluted to an equimolar concentration and pooled. The multiplexed samples were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform (Natural History Museum, London) using a single lane on a paired-end flow cell.

(c). Quality control and alignment

Samples were demultiplexed on the MiSeq instrument. FASTQ files were trimmed and filtered by quality using the web-based platform Galaxy [29]. PCR primer sequences were removed and SeqPrep (https://github.com/jstjohn/SeqPrep) was employed to remove adapter sequences and merge reads. Reads were aligned to a reference sequence (obtained through our Sanger sequencing) with Bowtie2 [30]. Duplicate sequences were removed using SAMTools [31] and a consensus sequence obtained implementing SAMTools quality scoring in UGene [32].

(d). Phylogenetic analyses

Ancient DNA sequences were aligned with modern oryzomyine mtDNA cyt b sequences available on GenBank (electronic supplementary material, table S2). For extant oryzomyines, we also retrieved and aligned GenBank sequences for two nuclear genes: interphotoreceptor retinoid binding protein (IRBP) and alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh1) intron 2 (electronic supplementary material, table S2). For each gene, DNA substitution model and partition fit were selected under Bayesian information criterion using PartitionFinder 1 [33]. Two partitions were selected for cyt b: codon positions 1 and 2 (GTR + G) and codon position 3 (HKY + G). For IRBP, partitioning was rejected and HKY + G was selected for all codon positions. For Adh1, the HKY + G substitution model was selected. For the full dataset (three gene regions), Bayesian trees were constructed using MrBayes v. 3.2 [34], implementing nucleotide substitution models as selected through PartitionFinder, using four chains (three heated, one cold) run for 1 × 107 generations, sampling every 1 × 104 generations with a burn-in period of 2500 trees. Nodal support was determined by approximate posterior probabilities performed in MrBayes. Divergence estimates and mutation rates were independently calculated in BEAST v. 1.7.5 [35] using the cyt b dataset with data partitioning and substitution models as selected through PartitionFinder. In all BEAST analyses, the Yule speciation process was implemented. Divergence dating for Caribbean fauna is problematic due to an almost complete absence of any Tertiary mammal fossil record from the insular Caribbean. We therefore applied a strict clock with a mutation rate of 4% per site per million years [36,37] in our divergence date estimates. To directly address the potential significance of known major historical events (3.75 Ma and 7 ka) without applying a fixed mutation rate, our second set of analyses fixed the divergence dates to either 3.75 Ma or 7 ka and estimated the mutation rate required. Two independent runs were conducted for each of the estimated parameters, with chain length set to 1 × 107 generations, data collected every 1 × 103 generations and a burn-in of 1 × 105 generations. Outputs from MrBayes and BEAST runs were examined with Tracer v. 1.5 [38] to check for stabilization and convergence between runs. Peromyscus truei was used as the outgroup. For comparison with existing oryzomyine data, pairwise sequence divergence estimates were calculated in MEGA v. 5.1 [39] using the Kimura-2 parameter (K2P) model.

3. Results and discussion

(a). Oryzomyine colonization of the Lesser Antilles: single or multiple events?

To determine the colonization dynamics of the extinct Lesser Antillean oryzomyines, we attempted to sequence a 560 bp region of mtDNA cyt b from a total of 42 ancient specimens collected from 10 islands (figure 1 and table 1). Eight specimens from seven islands (Antigua, Guadeloupe, Martinique, Nevis, St Eustatius, St Kitts and St Lucia) successfully yielded mtDNA. This low success rate was an expected outcome due to the known low preservation potential of ancient biomolecules from tropical island systems, which also prohibited attempts to amplify nuclear DNA.

Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of our aDNA data combined with modern data from 26 extant sigmodontine genera from continental Central and South America and the Galápagos Islands (electronic supplementary material, table S2) clearly identified two distinct colonization events of the main Windward–Leeward island chain north of St Vincent (figure 2). The endemic Antillean taxa Megalomys (Martinique, St Lucia) and Pennatomys (Nevis, St Eustatius, St Kitts) are demonstrated to be sister genera, in contrast to the conclusions of previous morphology-only phylogenetic analyses [19,20]. The monophyletic MegalomysPennatomys clade is distributed widely across the Lesser Antilles, and is most closely related to a clade containing representatives from both the mainland Neotropics (Trans-Andean South America and Central America; Aegialomys, Melanomys, Sigmodontomys) and the Galápagos Islands (Aegialomys, Nesoryzomys). These taxa together form part of a wider oryzomyine clade (‘Clade D’ of [15]), which has undergone extensive radiation throughout the oceanic and continental shelf islands of the Neotropical region (also including Curaçao, Fernando de Noronha, Jamaica and Trinidad [15,19]), and which contains several taxa that possess semi-aquatic adaptations (e.g. natatory fringes, interdigital membranes) and are associated with marshes, rivers, streams or coastlines, probably predisposing them to accidental overwater waif dispersal [19].

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Oryzomyine phylogeny inferred from mtDNA (cyt b) and nuclear (IRBP and Adh1) sequence data, showing Bayesian posterior probabilities of nodes. Extinct Lesser Antillean oryzomyine taxa are highlighted in bold; outgroup (Peromyscus truei) removed for display purposes. Scale bar represents number of substitutions per site. (Online version in colour.)

By contrast, oryzomyines from Antigua and Guadeloupe, representing taxonomically undescribed populations, together constitute a separate monophyletic clade not predicted by previous published studies, occurring on islands situated geographically intermediate between the distributions of Megalomys and Pennatomys along the Windward–Leeward island chain. This clade appears most closely related to the mainland South American genus Hylaeamys, and falls within a different wider oryzomyine clade (‘Clade B’ of [15]). Extant members of this clade are primarily inhabitants of forest environments in Central and South America, occurring across the Amazonian and Orinoco basins [40]. Although not having the same suite of semi-aquatic adaptations as members of Clade D, Hylaeamys and closely related genera occur along riverbanks and so could become associated with natural rafts of floating vegetation for overwater dispersal. The high posterior probability value for the placement of the Antigua–Guadeloupe clade (0.98) and even stronger support for the deep genetic divergence that separates the Antigua–Guadeloupe and MegalomysPennatomys clades (1.00) demonstrate distinct evolutionary histories for these taxa, revealing that the main Windward–Leeward island chain north of St Vincent was colonized separately from South America by at least two oryzomyine lineages that were only distantly related.

(b). Antillean oryzomyine diversity

A second unexpected result of our aDNA analyses was the high level of phylogenetic diversification observed within the recently extinct oryzomyine radiation across the Lesser Antilles. Although overall endemism is high within the main Windward–Leeward island chain, Antillean terrestrial vertebrate taxa are typically distributed across all major islands situated together on shallow submerged banks, which would have been exposed above water during repeated Quaternary low sea-level stands, thus periodically removing barriers to gene flow between neighbouring populations. Many Antillean vertebrates are therefore interpreted as ‘bank endemics’, with little differentiation usually observed between allopatric populations on the same island bank [41]. In particular, the St Kitts Bank (comprising Nevis, St Eustatius and St Kitts) displays a particularly low level of bank endemism in its reptile fauna compared with other Lesser Antillean island groups, suggesting greater potential for dispersal of terrestrial vertebrate populations across this part of the Windward–Leeward island chain [41].

Oryzomyines from Nevis, St Eustatius and St Kitts were originally interpreted as conspecific and all assigned to Pennatomys nivalis, as fragmentary craniodental material available from Holocene zooarchaeological deposits on the three islands showed minimal apparent morphological differentiation [19]. However, our analyses reveal that oryzomyines from these islands display considerable genetic differentiation from each other, suggesting that gene flow between neighbouring island populations on the St Kitts Bank was surprisingly limited throughout the Quaternary. Interisland cyt b sequence divergence in oryzomyine populations on the St Kitts Bank ranges from 2.16% (Nevis–St Kitts) to 7.16% (Nevis–St Eustatius; table 2). This level of sequence divergence is comparable with the range reported between morphologically distinct species in some living sigmodontine rodent genera (e.g. Oecomys: 1.23–21% [42]), although similar levels of sequence divergence are also observed between allopatric populations of other sigmodontine species (e.g. Hylaeamys megacephalus: 0.13–9.13% [43]). While the taxonomic status of now-extinct oryzomyine populations on the St Kitts Bank therefore remains unresolved in the absence of further genetic or morphological data, these island populations had clearly experienced significant diversification and represent a relatively substantial, unexpected within-bank evolutionary radiation.

Table 2.

Pairwise estimates of cytochrome b sequence divergence (%) between oryzomyine samples from different Lesser Antillean islands.

St Kitts a St Kitts b St Eustatius Nevis St Lucia Martinique Antigua
St Kitts a
St Kitts b 0.85
St Eustatius 5.74 6.68
Nevis 2.16 2.16 7.16
St Lucia 11.1 10.1 12.7 10.6
Martinique 11.1 10.1 12.7 10.6 0
Antigua 16.2 15.1 15.8 16.7 11 11
Guadeloupe 16.2 15.1 15.8 16.7 11 11 0

Estimates of cyt b sequence divergence between oryzomyines on different island banks show even greater differentiation (table 2), supporting morphology-based genus-level differentiation between Megalomys and Pennatomys [19], and also supporting the distinctiveness of the Antigua–Guadeloupe lineage both from other Antillean oryzomyine genera (minimum sequence divergence = 11.0%, from Megalomys on Martinique–St Lucia) and from its mainland sister genus Hylaeamys (sequence divergence = 14.7%). These high sequence divergence estimates, and phylogenetic placement of the Antigua–Guadeloupe lineage far from the monophyletic MegalomysPennatomys clade within the wider oryzomyine radiation, both support our independent morphological assessment of the distinctiveness of the Antigua–Guadeloupe lineage. We therefore recognize it as being distinct at the genus level from other oryzomyines, and describe it here as the new genus and species Antillomys rayi (electronic supplementary material, appendix, systematic paleontology and figure S1).

(c). Temporal diversification

In order to examine patterns of temporal diversification in the two Lesser Antillean oryzomyine clades, we employed molecular clock analyses and a median (4% per site per million years) estimate for rodent cyt b mutation rates [36,37] (table 3; electronic supplementary material, appendix and figure S2). Both Antillomys and the MegalomysPennatomys clade are estimated to have diverged from the most recent common ancestor that each lineage shared with mainland South American oryzomyine sister taxa at very similar times, probably both during the Messinian Stage of the Late Miocene; Antillomys is estimated to have diverged at 6.303 Ma (95% HPD, 4.243–8.442 Ma), whereas the MegalomysPennatomys clade is estimated to have diverged at 6.814 Ma (95% HPD, 5.259–8.474 Ma). Megalomys and Pennatomys are also likely to have diverged from each other during the Messinian, with an estimated divergence date of 5.471 Ma (95% HPD, 3.823–7.288 Ma). Infrageneric diversification in Antillomys, Megalomys and Pennatomys is estimated to have occurred considerably later, during the Middle–Late Pleistocene: Antillomys = 0.097 Ma (95% HPD, 0.001–0.235 Ma), Megalomys = 0.127 Ma (95% HPD, 0.009–0.276 Ma) and Pennatomys = 1.209 Ma (95% HPD, 0.584–1.907 Ma). Notably, diversification within Pennatomys pre-dates the divergence of Megalomys populations on Martinique and St Lucia; as these Megalomys populations are recognized as morphologically distinct species (M. desmarestii and M. luciae) that vary in body mass as well as both craniodental and soft-tissue characteristics [1820], this provides further support for likely species-level differentiation between the morphologically more poorly understood Pennatomys populations on the St Kitts Bank. Conversely, diversification within Antillomys is very recent and post-dates divergence of other Antillean oryzomyine lineages, consistent with a lack of morphological differentiation between Antillomys populations on different islands (electronic supplementary material, appendix, systematic paleontology).

Table 3.

Date estimates (Ma) for the most recent common ancestor between selected oryzomyine taxa based on a moderate estimate (4% per site per million years) for rodent cyt b mutation rates (cyt b-only data).

taxa divergence date estimates
mean date 95% HPD lower 95% HPD upper
St Kitts and Nevis 0.343 0.135 0.586
St Kitts, Nevis and St Eustatius 1.209 0.584 1.907
St Lucia and Martinique 0.127 0.009 0.276
St Lucia, Martinique, St Kitts, Nevis and St Eustatius 5.471 3.823 7.288
St Lucia, Martinique, St Kitts, Nevis, St Eustatius, Nesoryzomys and Aegialomys 6.814 5.259 8.474
Antigua and Guadeloupe 0.097 0.001 0.235
Antigua, Guadeloupe and Hylaeamys 6.303 4.243 8.442

Additional analyses were used to explore the potential significance of known major historical events in driving the evolution and diversification of the Antillean oryzomyine fauna. The hypothesis that colonization of the insular Caribbean from mainland South America by oryzomyines was not possible before the closing of the Isthmus of Panama and establishment of a continuous terrestrial colonization route between North and South America around 3.5–4 Ma [44] was investigated by fixing the divergence date between island oryzomyine taxa and their mainland South American sister taxa to 3.75 Ma (s.d. = 0.5 Myr). The resultant mutation rate estimates generated under this model (electronic supplementary material, appendix, table S3), while faster than our initial moderate (4% per site per million years) mutation rate estimate, are not unfeasible. However, our models suggest that substantial diversification within the wider Neotropical oryzomyine clade probably occurred prior to the closing of the Isthmus, lending support to previous suggestions that oryzomyines first reached South America via transient island chains before the main phase of the Great American Biotic Interchange [23,24]. As some other terrestrial Caribbean vertebrates (e.g. Spondylurus skinks) may have speciated as recently as the mid-Holocene in response to post-glacial geographical isolation [45], further analysis was also conducted to investigate the possibility that interisland oryzomyine diversification may have been driven by supposed prehistoric Holocene Amerindian translocation [25]. However, even when the most recent oryzomyine inter-island divergence dates were fixed to the oldest suggested date for Amerindian occupation of the Lesser Antilles (approx. 7 ka, s.d. = 0.1 kyr [10,25]), the estimated mean mutation rates required (87–212%) are absurdly fast (electronic supplementary material, appendix, table S3).

(d). Comparative dynamics of island colonization and evolution

The unexpected and complex evolutionary history of the recently extinct Lesser Antillean oryzomyine radiation revealed by our aDNA analyses has wider implications for understanding the biological history of the insular Caribbean and other island systems. Different non-volant vertebrate lineages, including multiple mammal lineages, appear to have reached the Greater Antilles at various times throughout the Neogene, Palaeogene and Mesozoic via a complex series of overwater dispersals, transient land bridges and vicariance events [2,10,4551]. By contrast, although the Lesser Antillean volcanic arcs have been active since the Eocene [46,52], the region's modern non-volant vertebrate fauna is considerably younger in age. Whereas some non-volant vertebrate taxa (e.g. eleutherodactyline frogs [50], West Indian racers [51]) reached the main Lesser Antillean island chain from the Greater Antilles, other groups colonized directly from mainland South America, presumably through similar dispersal events to those that probably mediated the arrival of oryzomyines. Interestingly, other recent molecular studies indicate that numerous different amphibian and reptile taxa (frogs Allobates chalcopis and Leptodactylus fallax; pit-vipers Bothrops spp.; mabuyine skinks Capitellum spp., Mabuya spp. and Spondylurus spp.) reached the Lesser Antilles from South America during the Late Miocene, sharing a closely similar age to both the Antillomys and the Megalomys–Pennatomys lineages [45,53]. The Late Miocene was an interval of low eustatic sea level during which a northward riverine connection between Amazonia and the Caribbean may have existed [54], therefore potentially providing favourable geomorphological conditions that facilitated broadly simultaneous overwater waif dispersal of many South American mainland vertebrate lineages to the Lesser Antilles.

Infrageneric diversification in each of the Lesser Antillean oryzomyine genera took place during the Middle–Late Pleistocene, an interval when glacial cycles were driving major changes in sea level, island area and climate, and therefore facilitating isolation and speciation in many Caribbean island lineages [45,51]. However, oryzomyine populations from islands on the shallow St Kitts Bank, which were regularly reconnected during glacial cycles, retained an unexpectedly high degree of genetic structuring throughout the Pleistocene despite the potential for periodic gene flow between neighbouring populations. Comparable patterns of substantial phylogenetic differentiation maintained across periodic seaways are considered uncommon among insular vertebrates. However, other recent molecular studies have also demonstrated evidence for within-bank differentiation in groups such as West Indian racers (Alsophis) on some Lesser Antillean islands [51], as well as in some other mammal taxa occurring on continental shelf islands that have been regularly reconnected to neighbouring mainland populations of sister taxa (e.g. Hainan gibbon Nomascus hainanus [55]), suggesting that such insular phylogeographic structuring may be more common than previously supposed. The increasing use of molecular approaches for reconstructing phylogenetic relationships between different Caribbean vertebrate populations is likely to yield further substantial insights into the evolutionary dynamics of island lineages, and we encourage new investigation of other recently extinct Caribbean mammal lineages using aDNA techniques. We also highlight the unexpected diversity of the Lesser Antillean oryzomyine radiation, which is not predicted by previous morphology- or biogeography-based hypotheses of regional mammal evolution, and which emphasizes the severity of the recent Caribbean mammal extinction event.

Supplementary Material

Systematic Paleontology
rspb20142371supp1.docx (104.7KB, docx)

Supplementary Material

rspb20142371supp2.pdf (130.4KB, pdf)

Supplementary Material

SI_Fig_2
rspb20142371supp3.pdf (152.6KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

Investigation of Caribbean oryzomyine material was made possible by Richard Sabin, Paula Jenkins, Louise Tomsett, Roberto Portela Miguez and Andy Currant (Natural History Museum, London), Irv Quitmyer, Sylvia Scudder and Elizabeth Wing (Florida Museum of Natural History), Roger Colten (Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History), Kevin Farmer (Barbados Museum and Historical Society), Cecile Callou (Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris), Christina Giovas (University of Washington), Elaine Morris (University of Southampton), André Delpuech (Musée de Quai Branly, Paris) and Don McFarlane (Claremont Colleges).

Funding statement

This study was funded by a Natural Environment Research Council Doctoral Training grant no. (NER/S/A/2006/14031); a Helen Shackleton grant from Royal Holloway University of London; SYNTHESYS2 (SYNthesis of SYStematic resources), made available by the European Community Research Infrastructure; a Royal Society University Research Fellowship (UF080320); and a Royal Society Research Grant (RG100902).

References

  • 1.Wallace AR. 1880. Island life. London, UK: Macmillan & Co. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ricklefs R, Bermingham E. 2008. The West Indies as a laboratory of biogeography and evolution. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 2393–2413. ( 10.1098/rstb.2007.2068) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schluter D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Losos JB, Ricklefs RE. 2009. Adaptation and diversification on islands. Nature 457, 830–836. ( 10.1038/nature07893) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Grant PR. (ed.). 2008. Evolution on islands. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Worthy TH, Holdaway RN. 2002. The lost world of the moa: prehistoric life of New Zealand. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Steadman DW. 2006. Extinction and biogeography of tropical island birds. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cheke A, Hume J. 2008. Lost land of the dodo: the ecological history of Mauritius, Réunion, and Rodrigues. London, UK: T & AD Poyser. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Turvey ST. 2009. Holocene extinctions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Woods CA, Sergile FE. (eds). 2001. Biogeography of the West Indies: patterns and perspectives. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.MacPhee RDE, Flemming C. 1999. Requiem æternam: the last five hundred years of mammalian species extinctions. In Extinctions in near time: causes, contexts, and consequences (ed. MacPhee RDE.), pp. 333–371. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Turvey ST, Fritz SA. 2011. The ghosts of mammals past: biological and geographical patterns of global mammalian extinction across the Holocene. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 2564–2576. ( 10.1098/rstb.2011.0020) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Borroto-Páez R, Mancina CA. (eds). 2011. Mamíferos en Cuba. Vaasa, Finland: UPC Print. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.IUCN. 2013. The IUCN Red List of threatened species. 2013.1. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN; See www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 1 May 2014). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Weksler M. 2006. Phylogenetic relationships of the oryzomyine rodents (Muroidea: Sigmodontinae): separate and combined analyses of morphological and molecular data. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 296, 1–149. ( 10.1206/0003-0090(2006)296[0001:PROORM]2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Weksler M, Percequillo AR, Voss RS. 2006. Ten new genera of oryzomyine rodents (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae). Am. Mus. Novit. 3537, 1–29. ( 10.1206/0003-0082(2006)3537[1:TNGOOR]2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pine RH, Timm RM, Weksler M. 2012. A newly recognized clade of trans-Andean Oryzomyini (Rodentia: Cricetidae), with description of a new genus. J. Mammal. 93, 851–870. ( 10.1644/11-MAMM-A-012.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Allen GM. 1942. Extinct and vanishing mammals of the Western Hemisphere with the marine species of all the oceans. Washington, DC: American Committee for International Wild Life Protection. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Turvey ST, Weksler M, Morris EL, Nokkert M. 2010. Taxonomy, phylogeny, and diversity of the extinct Lesser Antillean rice rats (Sigmodontinae: Oryzomyini), with description of a new genus and species. Zool. J. Linnean Soc. 160, 748–772. ( 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2009.00628.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Turvey ST, Brace S, Weksler M. 2012. A new species of recently extinct rice rat (Megalomys) from Barbados. Mamm. Biol. 77, 404–413. ( 10.1016/j.mambio.2012.03.005) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McFarlane DA, Lundberg J. 2002. A Middle Pleistocene age and biogeography for the extinct rodent Megalomys curazensis from Curaçao, Netherlands Antilles. Carib. J. Sci. 38, 278–281. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Steadman DW, Ray CE. 1982. The relationships of Megaoryzomys curioi, an extinct cricetine rodent (Muroidea: Muridae) from the Galápagos Islands, Ecuador. Smithson. Contrib. Paleobiol. 51, 1–23. ( 10.5479/si.00810266.51.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Parada A, Pardiñas UFJ, Salazar-Bravo J, D'Elía G, Palma RE. 2013. Dating an impressive Neotropical radiation: molecular time estimates for the Sigmodontinae (Rodentia) provide insights into its historical biogeography. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 66, 960–968. ( 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.12.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Leite RN, Kolokotronis SO, Almeida FC, Werneck FP, Rogers DS, Weksler M. 2014. In the wake of invasion: tracing the historical biogeography of the South American cricetid radiation (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae). PLoS ONE 9, e100687 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0100687) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Newsom LA, Wing ES. 2004. On land and sea: Native American uses of biological resources in the West Indies. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brace S, Barnes I, Powell A, Pearson R, Woolaver LG, Thomas MG, Turvey ST. 2012. Population history of the Hispaniolan hutia Plagiodontia aedium (Rodentia: Capromyidae): testing the model of ancient differentiation on a geotectonically complex Caribbean island. Mol. Ecol. 21, 2239–2253. ( 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05514.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Meyer M, Kircher M. 2010. Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 6, pdb.prot5448 ( 10.1101/pdb.prot5448) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dabney J, Meyer M. 2012. Length and GC-biases during sequencing library amplification: a comparison of various polymerase-buffer systems with ancient and modern DNA sequencing libraries. Biotechniques 52, 87–94. ( 10.2144/000113809) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Goecks J, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J, Team G. 2010. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol. 11, 1–13. ( 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359. ( 10.1038/nmeth.1923) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup. 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Okonechnikov K, Golosova O, Fursov M, UGENE Team. 2012. Unipro UGENE: a unified bioinformatics toolkit. Bioinformatics 28, 1166–1167. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts091) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SYW, Guindon S. 2012. PartitionFinder: Combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1695–1701. ( 10.1093/molbev/mss020) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ronquist F, et al. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542. ( 10.1093/sysbio/sys029) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Drummond AJ, Suchard MA, Xie D, Rambaut A. 2012. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1969–1973. ( 10.1093/molbev/mss075) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Irwin D, Kocher T, Wilson A. 1991. Evolution of the cytochrome b gene of mammals. J. Mol. Evol. 32, 128–144. ( 10.1007/BF02515385) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hadly EA, Ramakrishnan U, Chan YL, van Tuinen M, O'Keefe K, Spaeth PA, Conroy CJ. 2004. Genetic response to climatic change: insights from ancient DNA and phylochronology. PLoS Biol. 2, e290 ( 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020290) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2009. Tracer v1.5. See http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer (accessed 3 May 2013). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2731–2739. ( 10.1093/molbev/msr121) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Voss RS, Emmons LH. 1996. Mammalian diversity in Neotropical lowland rainforests: a preliminary assessment. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 230, 1–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Censky EJ, Kaiser H. 1999. The Lesser Antillean fauna. In Caribbean amphibians and reptiles (ed. Crother BI.), pp. 181–221. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rosa CC, Flores T, Pieczarka JC, Rossi RV, Sampaio MIC, Rissino JD, Amaral PJS, Nagamachi CY. 2007. Genetic and morphological variability in South American rodent Oecomys (Sigmodontinae, Rodentia): evidence for a complex of species. J. Genet. 91, 265–277. ( 10.1007/s12041-012-0182-2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Miranda GB, Andrades-Miranda J, Oliveira LFB, Langguth A, Mattevi MS. 2007. Geographic patterns of genetic variation and conservation consequences in three South American rodents. Biochem. Genet. 45, 839–856. ( 10.1007/s10528-007-9122-x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Coates AG, Jackson JBC, Collins LS, Cronin TM, Dowset HJ, Bybell LM, Jung P, Obando JA. 1992. Closure of the Isthmus of Panama: the near-shore marine record of Costa Rica and Panama. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 104, 814–828. () [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hedges SB, Conn CE. 2012. A new skink fauna from Caribbean islands (Squamata, Mabuyidae, Mabuyinae). Zootaxa 3288, 1–244. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Iturralde-Vinent MA, MacPhee RDE. 1999. Paleogeography of the Caribbean region: implications for Cenozoic biogeography. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 238, 1–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Graham A. 2003. Geohistory models and Cenozoic paleoenvironments of the Caribbean region. Syst. Bot. 28, 378–386. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Roca AL, Bar-Gal GK, Eizirik E, Helgen KM, Maria R, Springer MS, O'Brien SJ, Murphy WJ. 2004. Mesozoic origin for West Indian insectivores. Nature 429, 649–651. ( 10.1038/nature02597) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dávalos LM, Turvey ST. 2012. West Indian mammals: the old, the new, and the recently extinct. In Bones, clones, and biomes: the history and geography of recent Neotropical mammals (eds Patterson BD, Costa LP.), pp. 157–202. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Heinicke MP, Duellman WE, Hedges SB. 2007. Major Caribbean and Central American frog faunas originated by ancient oceanic dispersal. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10 092–10 097. ( 10.1073/pnas.0611051104) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hedges SB, Couloux A, Vidal N. 2009. Molecular phylogeny, classification, and biogeography of West Indian racer snakes of the Tribe Alsophiini (Squamata, Dipsadidae, Xenodontinae). Zootaxa 2067, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Maury RC, Westbrook GK, Baker GK, Bouysse P, Westercamp D. 1990. Geology of the Lesser Antilles. In The geology of North America (eds Dengo G, Case JE.), pp. 141–166. Boulder, CA: Geology Society of America. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fouquet A, Pineau K, Rodrigues MT, Mailles J, Schneider JB, Ernst R, Dewynter M. 2013. Endemic or exotic: the phylogenetic position of the Martinique volcano frog Allobates chalcopis (Anura: Dendrobatidae) sheds light on its origin and challenges current conservation strategies. Syst. Biodivers. 11, 87–101. ( 10.1080/14772000.2013.764944) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Wilkinson MJ, Marshall LG, Lundberg JG, Kreslavsky MH. 2010. Megafan environments in northern South America and their impact on Amazon Neogene aquatic ecosystems. In Amazonia landscape and species evolution: a look into the past (eds Hoorn C, Wesselingh FP.), pp. 162–184. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Thinh VN, et al. 2010. Mitochondrial evidence for multiple radiations in the evolutionary history of small apes. BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 74 ( 10.1186/1471-2148-10-74) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Systematic Paleontology
rspb20142371supp1.docx (104.7KB, docx)
rspb20142371supp2.pdf (130.4KB, pdf)
SI_Fig_2
rspb20142371supp3.pdf (152.6KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES