Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 8.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2014 May 15;7(4):1270–1283. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.04.018

In vivo Clonal Analysis Reveals Lineage-Restricted Progenitor Characteristics in Mammalian Kidney Development, Maintenance and Regeneration

Yuval Rinkevich 1,, Daniel T Montoro 2,*, Humberto Contreras-Trujillo 1,*, Orit Harari-Steinberg 3, Aaron M Newman 1, Jonathan M Tsai 1, Xinhong Lim 1, Renee Van-Amerongen 1, Angela Bowman 1, Michael Januszyk 2, Oren Pleniceanu 3, Roel Nusse 1,4, Michael T Longaker 1,2, Irving L Weissman 1,5,§, Benjamin Dekel 3,‡,§
PMCID: PMC4425291  NIHMSID: NIHMS587612  PMID: 24835991

Summary

The mechanism and magnitude, by which the mammalian kidney generates and maintains its proximal tubules, distal tubules, and collecting ducts, remain controversial. Here we utilized long-term in-vivo genetic lineage tracing and clonal analysis of individual cells from kidneys undergoing development, maintenance, and regeneration. We show that the adult mammalian kidney undergoes continuous tubulogenesis via expansions of fate-restricted clones. Kidneys recovering from damage undergo tubulogenesis through expansions of clones with segment-specific borders, and renal spheres developing in-vitro from individual cells maintain distinct, segment-specific fates. Analysis of mice derived by transfer of color-marked ES cells into uncolored blastocysts demonstrates that nephrons are polyclonal, developing from expansions of singly fated clones. Finally, we show that adult renal clones are derived from Wnt responsive precursors, and their tracing in-vivo generates tubules that are segment-specific. Collectively, these analysis demonstrates that fate-restricted precursors functioning as unipotent progenitors continuously maintain and self-preserve the mouse kidney throughout life.

Keywords: Axin2, clone, kidney, progenitor, regeneration, stem cells, Wnt

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms587612u1.jpg

Introduction

The adult mammalian kidney has been classically regarded as a static organ with limited cellular turnover and regenerative capacity (Little, 2006). Nephrogenesis, the process by which new nephrons are generated, initiates in a unique anatomical site of the developing kidney cortex, the cap mesenchyme (CM). In the CM, multipotent stem/progenitor cells are believed to form whole nephrons until 34 weeks of human gestation and for 1–2 weeks in the postnatal mouse, after which the nephrogenic zone exhausts its stem/progenitors (Dressler, 2009; Rosenblum, 2008; Hartman et al., 2007). Humans are estimated to be born with 300,000 – 1,000,000 nephrons and are unable to generate additional whole nephrons under physiological or pathological conditions (Rosenblum 2008). This is in contrast to invertebrates (Singh et al., 2007) (fly) and lower vertebrates (Diep et al., 2011) (fish), where multipotent renal stem/progenitors are thought to exist in adulthood. In the developing mouse embryo, lineage-tracing studies demonstrate that undifferentiated CM gives rise to all epithelial cell types of the adult nephron (Herzlinger et al., 1992; Kobayashi et al., 2008; Boyle et al., 2008) and that this population self-renews, fulfilling the requirements for stem cells similar to the reports from the adult fly and fish (Singh et al., 2007; Diep et al., 2011).

Although the regenerative capacity of the adult mammalian kidney remains largely unexplored at the single cell level, the appearance of epithelial cells in the urine due to normal shedding (68,000–72,000 cells per hour; Prescott, 1996) and the documented renal repair that follows damage suggest that the mammalian kidney undergoes constant cellular renewal (Little, 2006). Various cellular models for the maintenance and repair of the adult mammalian kidney have been proposed including: i) circulating extra-renal cells (Pleniceanu et al., 2010) ii) renal epithelial cells undergoing limited and terminal cell divisions (Bonventre, 2003; Humphreys et al., 2011; Humphreys et al., 2008) and iii) multipotent adult renal stem cells (Oliver et al., 2004; Bussolati et al., 2005; Sagrinati et al., 2006; Dekel et al., 2006; Maeshima et al., 2006; Appel et al., 2009).

As such, a fundamental question in renal biology still exists as to how and to what extent, the kidney physiologically maintains, and regenerates its entire compartments in vivo. We utilized long-term genetic lineage tracing and clonal analysis of individual cells to analyze the magnitude of tissue renewal within the adult mammalian kidney and to discriminate between the proposed cellular modes. Our results reveal a mechanism of continuous regeneration and cellular renewal of kidney epithelia by fate-restricted and segment-specific clones, beginning from fetal stage and persisting throughout adult life.

Results and Discussion

Clonal analysis in the adult kidney

Mouse kidneys continue to grow in mass for the first 12 weeks post-parturition (from 8 weeks to 12 weeks, P value=0.001046), a timepoint from which they maintain a steady-state mass (Figure 1A; from 12 weeks to 40 weeks, P value=0.208876). These values were used to establish periods in which renal growth was absent, and in which the magnitude and cellular mechanisms underlying renal maintenance could be assessed. We genetically lineage traced individual cells within the adult kidney (>12 weeks) using ‘Rainbow’ mice (Rinkevich et al., 2011), which harbor a multicolor (red, yellow, green, blue) Cre-dependent reporter construct within the ROSA locus (R26VT2/GK3). To analyze all renal epithelial cell types, including rare and presumed multipotent stem cells, we employed a lineage tracing strategy that was independent of candidate markers, by crossing Rainbow mice with mice harboring an inducible Cre-ER fusion protein under the ubiquitous Actin promoter (ActinCreER). ActinCreER; R26VT2/GK3 offspring were injected with tamoxifen at 12 weeks of age to induce cytoplasmic fusion protein to enter the nucleus and randomly recombine permanently a single color-encoding gene. Mice were sacrificed following one, two, four and seven months, at which times the fluorescent patterns were analyzed. Over a 1 month period, small 2–3 epithelial cell clones were scattered throughout the cortex, medullae and papillae (Figure S1A, 1-month, n=400). Over extended periods, a subset of epithelial cells increased in size over time, giving rise to large (>8 cells) clones that have contributed substantially to existing tubules within the cortex (Figure 1B, dotted white line), medulla (Figure 1C, dotted white line), and papillae (Figures 1D).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Clonal analysis during adult kidney growth. (A) Line chart depicting the mean change in kidney mass over time. X-axis represents age in days. Y-axis represents kidney mass in grams. (B–D) Composite (Rainbow & DAPI) images from ActinCreER; R26VT2/GK3 mice that was chased for 7 months. Singly colored clones contribute to distinct segments in the renal cortex (B, single red clone is outlined), medulla (C, single yellow clone is outlined), papilla (D, blue clone is outlined). (EG) Composite images from ActinCreER; R26VT2/GK3 mice following a low dose regimen of tamoxifen, showing single and sparse clones of 8–10 cells (EG, dotted white line). (H–J) Isolated nephron segments from ActinCreER; R26VT2/GK3 mice that were chased for 7 months reveal some tubule segments lack any clonal expansions (H, arrows), while others show extensive tubulogenesis by single colored clones (I, J, dotted white line). Scale bar: BD, HJ (50μm); EG (25μm).

Each single color segment was uninterrupted by any single cell of another color, ruling out migration of other cells into the clonal region. In each time point (1, 2, 4, 7 months) only epithelial cell types were in the clone, indicating that physiological epithelial-mesenchymal transformation (EMT) is not apparent within the kidney (Duffield & Humphreys, 2011; Duffield, 2010). These results are not consistent with interstitial mesenchymal cells contributing to renal epithelial repair (Humphreys et al., 2008; Humphreys et al., 2010), but are consistent with intrinsic renal epithelial cells that mediate tubulogenesis. To rule out the possibility of cellular contributions from adjacent and similarly colored cells to these clones, we performed genetic lineage tracing by administering single and low doses of tamoxifen (see ‘Methods’ section). In these experiments, the frequency of recombination was low (<1%) such that renal epithelial cells were sparsely labeled within large and non-colored kidney domains. Despite the scarcity of labeled cells, kidneys subjected to lineage tracing over 7 months showed single-colored and large clones of 10–12 cells in all kidney regions (Figure 1E–1G), highlighting genuine clonal outputs by individual cells.

To visualize the full sizes and distributions of clones we isolated intact nephron segments (Schafer et al., 1997) from ActinCreER; R26VT2/GK3 mice that were chased for 7-months. Intact tubules either showed no significant tubulogenesis in some instances (Figure 1H) or contained large epithelial clones (Figures 1I, 1J) within individual segments (n=75), consistent with epifluorescence analysis of serial sections. Large clones of >10 cells expanded along the longitudinal and perpendicular axes of tubules (Figures 1I, 1J), contributing circumferentially as well as longitudinally to tubule segments. These results indicate that substantial tubulogenesis has occurred within the adult renal epithelium. Despite the lack of increase in renal mass from 12 weeks post-parturition onwards (Figure 1A), cumulative counting of cell divisions (see ‘Methods’ section) in the adult kidney over 7 months, indicated that the magnitude of tubulogenesis within the adult kidney is equivalent to 4.6–6 times complete renewal of the renal epithelium (x4.6=cortex; x6=medullae; x5=papillae). Tissue renewal occurred despite 20–25% of renal epithelial cells failing to divide, indicating that only a subset of adult epithelial cells generates new tubule segments postnatally.

The composition of new tubule segments generated postnatally by renal clones was determined by using distinguishing markers for the various tubule types (Laitinen et al., 1987) (Figure 2A, see ‘Methods’ section). Thirty-one clones were examined within distal convoluted tubules (DTs) and stained entirely with DT-specific marker peanut agglutinin (PNA) in the mouse cortex (Figures 2B-2B⁗). Fifty-four clones were examined within proximal convoluted tubules (PTs) and stained entirely with the PT-specific marker lotus tetragonolobus lectin (LTA; Figures 2F-2F‴ and 2G-2G‴), while 115 clones examined within the collecting ducts (CDs) stained entirely for CD-specific markers aquaporin-2 (AQP2) and aquaporin-3 (AQP3) in the mouse papilla (Figures 2C-2C⁗ and 2D-2D⁗). Indeed, combinations of single and double staining using LTA/MUC1 (Figures 2E-2E‴), LTA/PNA, (Figures 2F-2F‴), LTA/Calbindin (Figures 2G-2G‴) indicated that clones maintained composition of a single renal lineage and tubule type, including clones (n=200) at the interface between tubule segments (Figure S1, B-B″, C-C″, D-D″).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Fate-restriction of clones during adult kidney maintenance. (A) Illustration of a single nephron tubule with distal tubule, loop of henle, proximal tubule and collecting duct segments. Segment specific markers (provided in the image) were used to characterize the composition of individually colored clones. (B–D) Long-lived clones that emerge following 7 months of chase are entirely retained within the segment-specific domains of label. (B) PNA+ illustrates a clone with a DT fate. (C, D) AQP2 and AQP3 illustrate clones with a CD fate (E–G) Double immunostaining of segment-specific markers shows that clones are fate-restricted to a single tubule type. (E) LTA MUC1 illustrates a clone with a DT fate. (F) LTA+ PNA illustrates a clone with a PT fate. (G) Calbindin+ LTA illustrates a clone with DT fate. PT, proximal tubule; DT, distal tubule, CD, collecting duct. (BG) Numbers on top right hand side of images represent the clone size. Scale bar: BG (50μm).

Given the complete absence of clonal expansion into different segments on the scale of these experiments, it is likely that the clone-initiating cells that maintain constant tubulogenesis within the adult kidney are intrinsically limited in their capacity for differentiation, and that a multipotent stem cell, if at all present, is physiologically negligible to adult tissue renewal.

Negligible contributions from circulating cells to kidney maintenance

To address the possibility of a circulating population of cells that contribute to adult tubulogenesis, we generated pairs of genetically marked parabiotic mice that have a shared anastomosed circulatory system (Wagers et al., 2002). Wild-type mice were surgically conjoined to mice expressing GFP under a ubiquitous (chicken β-actin) promoter. These mice develop full hematopoietic chimerism within a month (Wagers et al., 2002). Kidneys from wild-type mice that were removed after 12 months of parabiosis showed donor derived GFP+ cells throughout interstitial spaces of the kidney, in the renal pelvis and in cell foci surrounding some glomeruli (Figure S2) that did not incorporate into any glomerular, tubular, vascular or epithelial structures, or express endothelial or renal epithelial markers (Figure S2). All GFP+ cells expressed the pan hematopoietic marker CD45 (Figures S2, D-D″) as well as CD11c and F4/80 (Figure S2, E-E″, F-F″), indicating they belong to the monocyte/macrophage lineage. We found no evidence of contributions from circulating cells, of any type, to cell turnover within the kidney, including glomerular mesangium, which were previously suggested to repopulate from bone marrow cells (Cornacchia et al., 2011).

These results of renal tubule-restricted clonal segment-specific epithelial cells are complemented by our previous studies which demonstrated generation of non-epithelial fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells from a mesothelial precursor lineage (Rinkevich et al., 2012) and collectively demonstrate a mechanism of organ renewal by tissue- and lineage-restricted precursors for both renal tubule and non-tubule (endothelial, smooth muscle, mesothelium, fibroblast) components. Like our studies on digit-tip regeneration in mice, wherein lineage-restricted local tissue type-specific stem/progenitor cells (Rinkevich et al., 2010) rather than de-differentiated pluripotent blastema cells are responsible for regeneration, and our previous studies that blood-forming stem cells can only make blood (Wagers et al., 2002), and not other tissues such as heart cells (Balsam et al., 2004), brain cells (Massengale et al., 2005), or any endoderm derived epithelial cells (Wagers & Weissman, 2004) by transdifferentiation, it appears that the mouse and human body plans for tissue maintenance occurs via tissue restricted and tissue subregion-specific cells with stem/progenitor characteristics.

Clonal analysis of the developing kidney

During kidney development, early mesenchyme of the nephrogenic cortex is induced to undergo mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) and differentiates into kidney epithelium (Dressler, 2009; Rosenblum, 2008; Harari-Steinberg et al., 2013). In the pre-MET developmental stage Six2 specifies mesenchymal progenitors that can give rise to multiple cell types of the nephron tubule (Kobayashi et al., 2008). Post-MET developmental stages represent induced epithelia at varying stages of differentiation and mature nephron tubules. We performed clonal analysis of renal tubules at post-MET stages to identify cellular mechanisms of tubule growth.

Using the ActinCreER; R26VT2/GK3 system, we traced embryonic renal progenitors from gestational stage of E13.5 up to postnatal day 1 (P1) (see ‘Methods’ section). In these post-MET stages, tubules were polyclonal, derived from multiple mixed progenitors (Figures 3B–3D, dotted white lines) similar to lineage tracing observations of adult kidneys. We separately generated tetrachimeric mice by injecting mouse embryonic stem cells that stably express separate fluorescent proteins (GFP-mES, RFP-mES, CFP-mES) into wild-type blastocysts (Ueno & Weissman, 2006). Within tetrachimera kidneys, mature nephrons were polyclonal revealing mixed contributions of clones to individual tubule segments (Figures 3E–3H). A similar polyclonal pattern was observed under confocal fluorescent microscopy in both renal tubules (Figure 3I) and glomeruli (Figures 3J–3J″). Within the renal papilla we found a pattern of clonal foci in the loop of Henle (Y.R personal observations), indicating that their progenitors directly seed the renal papilla without prior cellular intermixing. This mosaic polyclonal composition of kidney epithelia (both in CM-derived nephron epithelia and collecting ducts derived from ureteric buds) suggests that several types of stem/progenitor cells are present during kidney organogenesis. Immunostaining for renal epithelial subtypes in tetrachimeras illustrated that clones were separately composed of PT, DT, or CD-fates (Figures 3K–3P). Thus, while the in-vivo clonal analysis cannot definitely assess the pre-MET stage, it indicates that similar to adulthood, at least during the post-MET developmental stages, the immediate contributing precursors to the kidney tubules are locally restricted to a single lineage and tubule type.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Clonal analysis of the developing kidney. (AD) Composite images (Rainbow & DAPI) from ActinCreER; R26VT2/GK3 mice that were traced from gestational stage of E13.5 up to postnatal day 1 (AD). Lineage traced cells in the Cap mesenchyme are intermixed at the cortex prior to differentiation (A, white line). At post-MET stages, tubules are expanding from mixed progenitors (B, C, dotted white line) creating the future polyclonal nephrons. (D) A later stage in a developing tubule showing separate red and green clones contributing to a single tubule segment. (EH) Composite (Rainbow & DAPI) images of renal tubules from a tetrachimeric mouse. (E) An image of the medulla showing polyclonal nephron and CD tubules. White arrows indicate boarders between clones within individual nephrons. (F) High power image showing non-dividing cells (white arrows) and cell processes interspersed within a green clone. Dotted white line indicates the boarder of the green clone within adjacent and separately colored tubule. (G, H) Separately colored clones are retained within tubules of the CD. (I) Confocal fluorescent microscopy image of the medulla and a glomerular mesangium showing separate red and green clones of mesangial cells (JJ″). Singly colored clones from tetrachimeric mice are fate-restricted to PTs (KM, LTA+ PNA), DT (N, O, PNA+), or CD-fates (P, AQP3+). PT, proximal tubule; DT, distal tubule, CD, collecting duct. PT, proximal tubule; DT, distal tubule, CD, collecting duct. Scale bar F, IP (50μm); AD, EH (25μm).

Clonal analysis of the kidney during repair

We investigated the response of the kidney to acute injury by performing unilateral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) to the left kidneys of adult mice (Bonventre & Yang, 2011). Kidneys subjected to I/R showed extensive tubular damage characterized by loss of the epithelial brush border (Figure S3B, black asterisk), flattening of epithelial cells, necrotic tubular cells, and tubular casts at 72 hr post-injury (Figure S3B, black arrowheads). At 4 days post-injury, trichrome-stained kidney sections revealed ectopic collagen deposition and interstitial fibrosis (Figure S3D) especially in those kidneys subjected to prolonged occlusion times (60, 75 minutes). To investigate the clonal responses of the kidney to renal injury, tamoxifen was injected into ActinCreER; R26VT2/GK3 mice, followed by clamping of the left renal arteries. Kidneys were harvested and sectioned after 2 months to allow the cumulative representations of all potential clones (early and late) triggered during the injury response, including cell activities involved in physiologic renal maintenance during this period. Single colored clones appeared in the damaged kidney cortex (Figures 4A-4A″, dotted white lines), medulla (Figures 4B-4B″, dotted white lines) and papilla (Figures 4C-4C″, dotted white lines), and were restricted to their nascent tubule segments of PTs, DTs, and CDs. In areas of damage, we found significant tubulogenesis (Figures 4B and 4C), with clones that have contributed circumferentially to an entire tubule. Confocal and epifluorescence analyses of serial sections indicated that clones expanded in parallel to the longitudinal and perpendicular axes of a tubule (Figures 4D and 4D′), but which did not cross to adjacent segments within a nephron (on the transverse plane) nor to neighboring nephrons (on the sagittal plane). Quantitative counting of clones indicated that significantly more epithelial cells entered cell cycle following injury than did during maintenance, with the highest surge of cell division occurring in the renal cortex (60% vs. 41%, Figure S4A).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Clonal analysis of the mammalian kidney following Ischemia/Reperfusion (I.R.). (AC) Composite Rainbow images from ActinCreER; R26VT2/GK3 mice following two months of tracing. (A-A″) Singly colored red and green clones contributing to the damaged renal cortex. (B-B″) Singly colored yellow and red clones contributing to the damaged renal medulla. (C-C″) High power image showing red and green clones contributing to the damaged collecting ducts. (D, D′). Confocal Rainbow images of the renal medulla showing clones are retained within segments following renal damage. (E–I) Singly colored clones that emerge following renal damage are fate-restricted. Clones are either completely absent (PNA+ for DT fate) or entirely express (DBA+ for CD fate) the segment-specific markers. Double immunostaining of segment-specific markers showing a green clone that is LTA+ DBA (H) and LTA+ AQP3 (I) both representing a DT fate. PT, proximal tubule; DT, distal tubule, CD, collecting duct. Scale bar: A, CI (50μm); B (25μm).

The possibility of a multipotent cell phenotype emerging in response to damage was determined by analyzing the long-term fates of renal clones. Clones within I.R-subjected kidneys were entirely retained within the domain of a single tubule marker (or completely absent, Figures 4E-4E⁗, 4F-4F⁗, 4G-4G⁗). Double immunostaining of DBA/LTA (Figures 4H-4H‴), and AQ3/LTA (Figures 4I-4I‴) in areas of renal damage confirmed that clones maintained the fate of one single renal lineage and tubule type, similar to adult maintenance and fetal development.

We explored a second model of acute renal failure using intra-muscular injection of glycerol (Figure S3, E–H), which results in rhabdomyolysis and myoglobinuria leading to toxic tubular damage (Buzhor et al., 2013). Significant tubulogenesis was independently observed in kidneys that were acutely subjected to glycerol-induced injury (Figure S5), and by expansions of clonal precursors that are fate-restricted (Figure S5, F, G).

Establishment of renal organoids in-vitro

To investigate the in-vitro fates from individual renal precursors, we established a culture system of growing renal epithelial organoids in suspension (Ootani et al., 2009; Buzhor et al., 2011) (see ‘Methods’ section). Kidneys were harvested from ActinCreER; R26VT2/GK3 mice following tamoxifen injection, dissociated into single cells, and plated with matrigel on 24 and 48-well plates. Within several days of culturing, multiple renal organoids developed, gradually enlarged, and then opened into hollow spheres resembling renal tubes in-vivo. We found that monoclonal, bi-clonal, and polyclonal spheres emerged in our culture systems (Figures 5A-5A⁗) with similar propensity, appearance and size. To test the in-vitro clonal efficiency of renal progenitors, we plated ActinCreER; R26VT2/GK3 renal cells in limiting dilution. Approximately 30, 6, and 1 spheres emerged per well following the culture of 1×106, 1×105, and 1×104 cells, respectively (average formation of spheres/well was 1.4 spheres/10,000 cells or 0.014%, Figure 5C). Within all dilutions, a similar propensity for monoclonal/polyclonal spheres emerged (43%/57% in 1×106 cells, 50%/50% in 1×105 cells and 52%/48% in 1×104 cells), indicating that progenitor frequency, not aggregations between renal cells, most likely underlies the frequency of renal spheres expanded in our culture system. Serial passaging of renal spheres over three sequential passages (Figure 5D), revealed that monoclonal spheres are constantly formed, and with increased propensity over time which is consistent with a subset of cells with self-renewal potential. We then analyzed the fate of monoclonal renal spheres derived from individual cells by staining with antibodies to distinct renal tubule segments. For each segment-specific marker we tested, spheres either stained entirely within all epithelial cells (Figures 5E-5E⁗ and 5F-5F⁗), or were entirely absent of label (n=48). Double and triple staining using combinations of segment-specific markers revealed that each renal sphere is fate-restricted to one tubule segment only (Figures 5G-5G‴, 5H-5H‴, 5I-5I‴), indicating that renal precursors give rise in-vitro to epithelial descendants of the same tubule type (PTs, DTs, CDs). While our culture conditions support all developmental fates, and spheres in serial passages, we cannot exclude the possibility that the culture conditions biased against a multipotent fate, an increasingly unlikely possibility given the concordance of our in-vivo and in-vitro data presented here.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Renal spheres that develop from individual cells are lineage-restricted in-vitro. (A-A⁗) Composite fluorescent images of spheres from single cell suspensions of ActinCreER; R26VT2/GK3 kidneys. (B-B″) Representative sections of renal spheres stained with Hematoxylin and eosin. (C) Histogram that graphically represents the frequency of spheres formed from cells cultured in limited dilution. (D) Graphical representation of the frequency of monoclonal/polyclonal spheres emerging after serial passaging. Following three passages, most emerging spheres are monoclonal (red line), and not polyclonal (blue line). (E, F) Images of sections from renal spheres immunostained with antibodies to distinct renal segments reveal that each segment-specific marker stains some but not all spheres. (G–I) Immunostaining of 3 representative spheres with antibodies for segment-specific markers. Each renal sphere is fate-restricted to DTs (PNA+), PTs (LTA+) or CDs (AQP3+). PT, proximal tubule; DT, distal tubule, CD, collecting duct. Scale bar: A-A⁗, B-B″, EI (50μm).

Clonal analysis of Wnt responsive cells

To examine renal precursors response to Wnt signaling, we analyzed the expression of Axin2 (Conductin) protein, a gene whose transcription is induced by β-catenin that has translocated into the nucleus, and which provides negative feedback in the wnt-β-catenin signaling pathway (Lustig et al., 2002). Kidneys from Axin2lacz transgenic mice, which express LacZ protein under the control of the endogenous Axin2 promoter/enhancer region, showed expression in single cells within the collecting system and the proximal tubules (Figures 6A and 6A′). We then lineage-traced the fate of single Wnt Responding Cells (WRCs) using mice harboring an inducible Cre-ER under the promoter of the Axin2 gene (Van Amerongen et al., 2012) (Axin2CreER). Axin2CreER transgenic mice were crossed with R26mTmG, a double-fluorescent reporter mouse that replaces the expression of tomato red with green fluorescent protein (GFP) after Cre-mediated excision (Muzumdar et al., 2007). Kidneys from Axin2CreER; R26mTmG (double heterozygote) offspring showed GFP expression within single cells of the collecting system, and proximal tubules four days after tamoxifen injection, similar to the pattern observed in Axin2lacz transgenic mice (Figure 6A″). Single WRCs that were traced from gestational stage E17.5 up to the 3rd postnatal month, showed large GFP+ clones within the cortex that were developmentally restricted to a PT-fate (Figures 6B and 6B′). Separate GFP+ clones appeared within the medullary papilla that were developmentally restricted to a CD-fate (Figures 6B″ and 6B‴). Isolation of intact nephron segments from Axin2CreER; R26mTmG mice indicated that single WRCs regenerated new tubule segments (Figures 6C-6C″, 6D-6D″, 6E-6E″), with more then a single tubule segment renewing per PT (Figures 6C″, 6D″, 6E″). A similar fate-restriction of clones was documented in kidneys from Axin2CreER mice crossed to ‘Rainbow’ reporter mice (Axin2CreER; R26VT2/GK3) that were lineage traced from e17.5 up to the 5th postnatal month. In these kidneys, single WRCs contributed separate colored clones to CD or PT fates (Figures 6F-6F‴). We then counted the clone sizes that emerged in Axin2CreER; R26VT2/GK3 kidneys (n=1580) and found that 97% of all WRCs (at the time of tamoxifen injection) formed large clones of up to 11 cells (Figure 6G). This represents a substantial increase in the proliferative capacity of WRCs compared to non-Wnt-distinguished cells, with the distribution of the former resembling the upper 5% of the latter.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Wnt-Responsive Cells (WRCs) are clone forming cells and lineage-restricted in-vivo. Sections from AxinlacZ/lacZ kidneys stained with beta-galactosidase and counter-stained with eosin showing Axin2 expression within the collecting system and proximal tubules (A, A′). Axin2CreER;R26mTmG kidneys that were pulsed for 4 days show GFP expression within the collecting system and proximal tubules (A″, white arrows). (B-B‴) Axin2CreER;R26mTmG kidneys that were pulsed from E17.5 up to the 3rd postnatal month show large GFP+ clones within proximal tubules and collecting ducts. (CD) Intact PT segments from Axin2CreER;R26mTmG kidneys show large GFP+ clones confined to individual segments. Axin2CreER; R26VT2/GK3 kidneys that were pulsed from E17.5 up to the 5th postnatal month show singly colored large clones within proximal tubules (F, F′) and collecting ducts (F″, F‴). (G) Histogram which graphically represent the difference in clonal outcomes of all cells (blue) vs. WRCs (red). (E,F) Clones derived from WRCs are lineage restricted to either PT or CD fates. Within the cortex, clones are LTA+, PNA indicating PT fate. (GI) Within the renal papilla, clones are DBA+, AQP2+, AQP3+ indicating CD fate. PT, proximal tubule; DT, distal tubule, CD, collecting duct. Scale bar: A′, A″ (50μm); A, B-B‴, F-F‴, CE (25μm).

Immunostaining of single WRC-derived cloned for segment-specific markers showed that clones were restricted to either a PT or CD fates. Within the renal cortex, clones were LTA+ (Figures 6H-6H⁗) and PNA (Figures 6I-6I⁗), consistent with a PT fate. Within the renal papilla, clones were DBA+ (Figures 6J-6J⁗), AQP2+ (Figures 6K-6K⁗), and AQP3+ (Figures 6L-6L⁗), consistent with a CD fate.

We then analyzed the contributions of WRCs to tubulogenesis that follows acute renal failure, using intra-muscular injection of glycerol (Figure S6). Axin2CreER; R26mTmG mice (n=3) that were subjected to glycerol-induced damage revealed after two months predominantly (95%) large clones that contributed new tubule segments within PTs (Figure S6, A-A″) and CDs (Figure S6, B-B″, C-C″). Lineage tracing of individual Axin2+ cells in a similar manner using the Axin2CreER; R26VT2/GK3 system (n=3), revealed single-colored and large clones within the renal epithelium, and that significant tubulogenesis has occurred via single Axin2+ precursors within PTs (Figure S6, D-D″) and CDs (Figure S6, E-E″). These observations are consistent with the subsets of cells with highest proliferative capacity observed using the ActinCreER system. The fact that Axin2 is expressed (at the time of recombination) within a subset of renal epithelial cells, that then trace long-lived and large clones of up to 11 cells, suggests that the molecular phenotype of the clone-forming cells are distinct from those of their daughter cells, and is consistent with a stem cell and/or progenitor characteristic of proximal and collecting system tubules. Going beyond the scope of this manuscript, it would be interesting to asses whether WRCs are a pre-determined subset or represent a transient step of cell differentiation induced by local Wnt stimuli.

A recent report by Barker et al (Barker et al., 2012) has recently identified LGR5+ cells as the immediate progenitors that generate the thick ascending limb of Henle’s loop and distal convoluted tubule during kidney development. Although LGR5, itself a Wnt-responsive gene, is silenced at later postnatal stages of development and fails to trace clone-forming cells in the adult, our analysis demonstrates that constant tubulogenesis is occurring within the mammalian kidney via a similar mechanism involving fate-restricted precursors throughout physiologic renal maintenance and following regeneration-induced damage. During revision stages of this manuscript two publications described fate mapping of proximal tubule epithelia during renal injury (Kusaba et al., 2014; Berger et al., 2014). Different from our long-term and unbiased clonal analysis regimen, these groups use marker genes to follow the fates of proximal tubule epithelia, and independently demonstrate that expanding proximal tubule epithelia are fate-restricted in their development during renal injury.

Thus, the daily shedding of epithelial cells from all compartments into the urine (Prescott, 1966) can be replenished by local cell production from Wnt-responsive, fate-restricted, and clone-forming cells that may function as uni-potent stem/progenitor cells. It is possible that the scattered distribution of single WRC indicates that they are self-renewed, and thus are uni-potential stem cells, but a more formal analysis of this possibility requires further study.

This mechanism could equally explain the compensatory renal growth that has been documented following nephrectomy (Kaufman et al., 1975) and the idiopathic renal growth documented in pediatric patients with either a solitary or single functioning kidneys (Spira et al., 2009). It also serves to explain the restricted fates and subtypes that have been observed within renal cell carcinomas (Valladares-Ayerbes et al., 2008), and inherited kidney disorders (Klootwijk et al., 2014; Bockenhauer et al., 2009) arising from specific kidney segments.

These experiments emphasize the importance of using genetic labeling of individual cells. Histological/immunohistochemical data (Witzgall et al., 1994), staining patterns of BrdU label-retention by cells (Oliver et al., 2004), or experiments where multiple thymidine analogs have been pulsed-then chased (Humphreys et al., 2008), would greatly depend on previous knowledge of the cell-cycle kinetics of resident cells. Without that knowledge, the distinction between a slow cycling progenitor and a differentiated cell undergoing its last cell division could not be made.

A similar cellular framework may also take place in liver and pancreas, where self-duplications of adult pancreatic islet cells (Dor et al., 2004) and liver hepatocytes have been reported. In those organs, as in the kidney, a morphologically homogeneous population can nevertheless contain clonogenic subsets, here shown to be the Wnt responsive cells, that produce the fate restricted kidney epithelial cells, display enhanced proliferative capacity, as well as retain the low frequency of WRCs, therefore offering a therapeutic target to increase or restore the regenerative capacity of the mammalian kidney.

Experimental Procedures

Mice

Mice were derived and maintained at the Stanford University Research Animal Facility in accordance with Stanford University guidelines. All the animals were housed in sterile micro-insulators and given water and rodent chow ad libitum. ActinCreER transgenic mice were a gift from Dr. Liqun Luo (Stanford University). Axin2lacZ and Axin2CreER (The Jackson Laboratory, strain name: B6.129(Cg)-Axin2tm1(cre/ERT2)Rnu/J, stock number 018867) were a gift from Dr. Roel Nusse (Stanford University). R26mT/mG transgenic mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory, strain name: B6.129(Cg)-Gt(ROSA)26Sor<tm4(ACTB-tdTomato,-EGFP), strain number: 007676. Male mice were used in all experiments, unless stated otherwise. Parabiosed wild-type mice were all females.

Mice genotyping

The following primers and PCR conditions were used for genotyping:

  • Cre; CGGTCGATGCAACGAGTGATGAGG and CCAGAGACGGAAATCCATCGCTCG. 94°C for 10 min, 94°C for 30 sec, 56°C for 1:30 min, 72°C for 1:30 min, repeat 35 cycles, 72°C for 8 min.

  • mTmG; CTCTGCTGCCTCCTGGCTTCT, CGAGGCGGATCACAAGCAATA and TCAATGGGCGGGGGTCGTT. 94°C for 3 min, 94°C for 30 sec, 61°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min, repeat 35 cycles, 72°C for 2 min.

Tamoxifen injections

Male mice were used in all experiments, unless stated otherwise. All strains used for genetic lineage tracing (including ActinCreER; R26Rainbow and AxinCreER; R26mTmG) were assessed for leakiness in adult kidneys, and show negative Rainbow fluorescence (using R26Rainbow reporter) or GFP fluorescence (using R26mTmG reporter) in the absence of tamoxifen administration.

Tamoxifen (Sigma) was prepared by dissolving in corn-oil (Sigma) to a concentration of 20mg/ml. 4–6mg tamoxifen was injected i.p every other day for 1 week, using a tuberculin syringe and 25-gauge needle.

To find tamoxifen concentrations where sparse labeling would take place within the renal epithelium, we injected male mice at >2.5 months of age with a single dose of tamoxifen/corn oil at various concentrations. At these postnatal stages we found that injecting tamoxifen i.p at concentrations bellow 1mg (n=5 mice) does not lead to recombination within the renal cortex and medullae, but only in papillary epithelium. 1–2mg tamoxifen/corn oil was found to be the minimal concentration where sparse labeling of around 1% would take place within all renal epithelium (n=5).

Lineage tracing of embryonic kidney

Adult female R26Rainbow mice older than 2 months of age were mated with adult AxinCreER or ActinCreER males. Plugs were checked every morning and 0.25mg/25g of tamoxifen diluted in corn oil was injected intraperitoneally at day E10.5–E13.5 with a BD 1ml insulin syringe with a 27 gauge needle. 8 Neonatal pups were sacked at day 1 and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde overnight and set in optimal cutting temperature compound (OCT). Kidneys (n=16) were subjected to five-micron sections and analyzed for multi-color fluorescence.

Generation of Tetrachimera mice

C57BL/6J female mice (Jackson Laboratory strain/000664) were superovulated with 5 IU of pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (Sigma G4877) and 5 IU of human choronic gonadotropin (hCG) (Sigma CG 10) and mated by a standard protocol. Morulars were collected at E2.5 and cultured with KSOM (Millipore MR-106-D) overnight to blasts. For each blastocyst, a mixture of 15 ES cells was injected. For single-cell injection, Rosa-EGFP, Rosa-ECFP, and Rosa-mRFP1 ES clones were put on a separate place on an injection chamber, and each one of the three clones were picked up and injected into a blastocyst. Injected blastocysts were then transferred into the uterus of Day 2.5 pseudopregnant CD1 mice (Charles River #022) and allowed to reach postnatal stages of development, at which time 5 Tetrachimera mice (male and female) were sacrificed at 30 days post parturition and their kidneys (n=10) were analyzed.

Renal Ischemia/Reperfusion (I/R) injury

A left peritoneal incision was performed on 5 male mice, 6–8 week of age to expose the kidney, followed by clamping of the left renal pedicle for 30–75 minutes.

Glycerol-induced acute kidney injury (AKI)

Following 22 hours of water deprivation, 5 male mice 6–10 weeks of age, received an intra-muscular injection of 6–8 mg/kg hypertonic glycerol (50% v/v, Sigma-Aldrich) as divided doses in both the hind limbs. Blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital sinus. Mice serum was extracted using 0.8ml Minicollect tube (Greiner Bio-One) according to manufacturer’s instructions and blood levels of creatinine and urea were measured using Olympus AU2700 analyzer. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) = Urea [mg/dL]/2.14

Mice exposed to a single intra-muscular injection of glycerol showed significant rise in blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine following 3 days (Figure S7), that was associated with tubular epithelial injury, generalized disorganization of the normal kidney structures including necrosis, cast formation (hyaline and cellular) and desegregation of tubular membranes (SFig. 10). Clonal analysis of kidneys following 2 months showed 40%, 38% and 36% of renal epithelial cells entered cell-cycle within the cortex, medulla, and papilla, respectively (Figure S8). The IR-induced clonal response is significantly different from that of the glycerol-induced response, and may be an outcome of regional susceptibility to hypoxia that exists between the compartments of the kidney.

Histology and tissue analysis

For fixation, kidney samples were placed in 2% paraformaldehyde for 12–16h at 4°C, and then prepared for embedding by soaking in 30% sucrose in PBS at 4°C for 24h. Kidney samples were removed from the sucrose solution and tissue blocks were prepared by embedding in Tissue Tek O.C.T (Sakura Finetek) under dry ice to freeze the samples within the compound. Frozen blocks were mounted on a MicroM HM550 cryostat (MICROM International GmbH) and 5–8 or 12 micron thick sections were transferred to Superfrost/Plus adhesive slides (Fisher brand).

Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining

All histological stains were carried out on 8uM formalin-fixed paraffin embedded sections. Nuclei were stained with Gill’s hematoxylin, blued with diluted ammonium hydroxide, and the cytoplasm was counterstained with acidified eosin.

Trichrome Staining

Trichrome stains of kidney samples 4 days after I/R injury were carried out according to Masson’s method. Samples were deparaffinized and rehydrated, re-fixed in Boiun’s solution, and stained with Weigert’s iron hematoxylin to stain nuclei, Biebrich scarlet-acid fuchsin to stain cytoplasm and keratin, and aniline blue to stain collagen fibers.

Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) Staining

PAS stains of kidney samples 3 days after glycerol administration were carried out using PAS kit (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the instructions of the manufacturer.

Confocal Microscopy

Confocal microscopy was carried out on 8–12uM cryosections counterstained with Hoechst 33342. A Leica SP2 AOBS (Acousto-Optical Beam Splitters) Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope was used to capture images allowing spectral detection and unmixing of overlapping spectrum with 20x 40x and 63x oil objectives. For resolution of nuclei-dense regions, Z-stacked confocal images were rendered into 3-dimensions using Volocity 6.0.1 software for clonal analysis.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunostaining was performed using the following primary antibodies CD31 (Abcam), CD90 (eBioscience), PEA (BD Pharmingen), Cytokeratin 5 (Abcam), Cytokeratin 14 (Covance), CD45 (Biolegend), LTA (Covance), DBA (Covance), PNA (Covance), Aquaporin 3 (Abcam), MUC1 (Abcam). Lotus tetragonolobus agglutinin (LTA) immunostains proximal tubules, Peanut agglutinin (PNA), and Calbindin, immunostain distal tubules, Aquaporin 2, Aquaporin 3 (AQP3), Dolichos biflorus agglutinin (DBA), and Mucin 1 (MUC1) immunostain collecting ducts.

Briefly, slides were blocked for 30min in 10% BSA with 2% goat serum followed by incubation with primary antibody for 12–16 hours. For immunoassaying on sections from ActinCreER; R26VT2/GK3 mice, Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated antibody was used as secondary 1:1000 for 1 hour (Invitrogen), and was visualized in the far-red channel (Cy5). Fluorescent and bright-field images were taken with a Leica DM4000B microscope (Leica Microsystems) and RETIGA 2000R camera (QImaging Scientific Cameras).

Cell counting

Clones were visualized using a Leica DM4000B microscope (Leica Microsystems). For each experiment, 400 clones from the renal cortex, medulla and papilla, were counted separately, and then averaged. Clone size was established by incorporating the numbers of nuclei in each clone per section, and by incorporating the total clone sizes from serial sections.

Physiological tissue renewal over 1 year was approximated by counting clones in the renal epithelium, only, and in areas with recombination frequency >95%. Overall cell division within a field was calculated by estimating the percentage of cells in each clone size times the number of cell divisions required to reach each clone size. For example, 20% renal epithelial cells exhibiting an average clone size of 10 cells/clone would indicate renewal of 20% × 9=180%. These values do not take into account renal epithelial cell death and shedding, and therefore represent a lower estimation.

In vitro culture of renal cells

To isolate renal cells, adult ActinCreER; R26VT2/GK3 (rainbow) mice were injected intraperitoneally with 4–6 mg of tamoxifen (Sigma). Kidneys were then collected, mechanically and enzymatically dissociated in Medium 199 containing Liberase TM, TH enzymes (Roche), and DNAse (Worthington) treated at 37°C until a single cell suspension was achieved. Dissociated cells were washed with PBS and serially filtered through 70-μm and 40-μm cell strainers. Red blood cells were lysed using ACK Lysing Buffer (Invitrogen). Single-cell suspensions were mixed with 25 μl of ice-cold Matrigel (reduced growth factors; BD Bioscience), plated in 48-well plates and allowed to solidify at 37°C. After polymerization of matrigel, 250 μl of culture medium (Advanced DMEM/F12 supplemented with Penicillin/Streptomycin, 10mM HEPES, GlutaMax, 1x N2, 1x B27-A [Invitrogen] and N-acetylcysteine [Sigma] containing growth factors (50ng/mL EGF [Peprotech], 500ng/mL R-spondin-1 [R&D] and 100ng/mL Noggin [Peprotech]) was added. Growth factors were added every fourth day and entire medium was changed every 8 days.

Kidney weight

Various age CD-1 wild-type mice (sharing background with ActinCreER; R26VT2/GK3 experimental animals) were purchased from Jackson Labs as individuals from separate litters to control for variable husbandry and litter conditions. Left and right kidneys were collected, and mesothelium was removed for accurate weighing in triplicate on a Mettler-Toledo AB54-S/FACT Electronic Analytical Balance to the nearest 10−4 grams. Control kidneys perfused with saline prior to weighing tended to be heavier than raw processed kidneys, but did not show a significant difference between kidneys of the same weight, nor did it change the trend of kidney mass over time. Statistics between individual age groups was determined with two-tailed t-test; each timepoint had 10 ≤ n ≥ 20 kidneys.

Supplementary Material

1
2

Highlights.

  1. Individual kidney epithelial cells generate segment-specific fate restricted clones

  2. This clonal behavior is observed in maintenance, development and repair of the kidney

  3. Wnt responsive kidney epithelia contribute large clones 4. Wnt responsive kidney epithelia function as unipotent progenitors

Acknowledgments

We thank Adriane Mosley for assistance with animal care and parabiosis experiments, and Charlene Wang for making the tetrachimeric mice. We thank Oren Pleancianu for his assistance with generating the illustration of the nephron tubule. We thank Kitty Lee and the Cell Sciences Imaging Facility (CSIF) Fluorescent Microscopy Core at Stanford University for technical assistance with confocal microscopy.

This work was supported in part by a grant from the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (RC1 00354) and from the Smith Family Trust (to ILW), the Oak Foundation and the Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric Regenerative Medicine (to MTL), the Israel Scientific Foundation (910-11), Israel Cancer Research Fund (PG-27013) and the Feldman Family Visiting Professorship, Stanford School of Medicine (to BD). Y.R. was supported by the Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP) Long Term Fellowship, the Machiah Foundation Fellowship and the Siebel foundation (1119368-104-GHBJI).

Footnotes

Author Contributions

Y.R and B.D designed and performed the kidney experiments, with suggestions from I.L.W and R.N. Y.R. imaged and analyzed the data from all kidney experiments. D.T.M performed the confocal imaging, and assisted with experiments and collection and analysis of data. H.C.T developed, performed, and analyzed the in-vitro assays. O.H.S analyzed outcomes of renal damage. R.V.A and X.H.L performed the lineage tracing in AxinCreERR26 mTmG mice. A.M.N, M.J and Y.R performed the statistical analysis. Y.R, D.T.M, I.L.W, M.T.L, and B.D. wrote the manuscript.

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Appel D, et al. Recruitment of podocytes from glomerular parietal epithelial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:333–343. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008070795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Balsam LB, et al. Haematopoietic stem cells adopt mature haematopoietic fates in ischaemic myocardium. Nature. 2004;428:668–673. doi: 10.1038/nature02460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barker N, et al. Lgr5(+ve) stem/progenitor cells contribute to nephron formation during kidney development. Cell Rep. 2012;2:540–552. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Berger K, et al. Origin of regenerating tubular cells after acute kidney injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:1533–1538. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1316177111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bockenhauer D, et al. Epilepsy, ataxia, sensorineural deafness, tubulopathy, and KCNJ10 mutations. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1960–1970. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bonventre JV. Dedifferentiation and proliferation of surviving epithelial cells in acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(Suppl 1):S55–61. doi: 10.1097/01.asn.0000067652.51441.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bonventre JV, Yang L. Cellular pathophysiology of ischemic acute kidney injury. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2011;121:4210–4221. doi: 10.1172/JCI45161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Boyle S, et al. Fate mapping using Cited1-CreERT2 mice demonstrates that the cap mesenchyme contains self-renewing progenitor cells and gives rise exclusively to nephronic epithelia. Developmental biology. 2008;313:234–245. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bussolati B, et al. Isolation of renal progenitor cells from adult human kidney. The American journal of pathology. 2005;166:545–555. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62276-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Buzhor E, et al. Kidney spheroids recapitulate tubular organoids leading to enhanced tubulogenic potency of human kidney-derived cells. Tissue engineering. 2011;17:2305–2319. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Buzhor E, et al. Reactivation of NCAM1 defines a subpopulation of human adult kidney epithelial cells with clonogenic and stem/progenitor properties. Am J Pathol. 2013;183:1621–1633. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.07.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cornacchia F, et al. Glomerulosclerosis is transmitted by bone marrow-derived mesangial cell progenitors. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2001;108:1649–1656. doi: 10.1172/JCI12916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dekel B, et al. Isolation and characterization of nontubular sca-1+lin− multipotent stem/progenitor cells from adult mouse kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:3300–3314. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005020195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Diep CQ, et al. Identification of adult nephron progenitors capable of kidney regeneration in zebrafish. Nature. 2011;470:95–100. doi: 10.1038/nature09669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dor Y, Brown J, Martinez OI, Melton DA. Adult pancreatic beta-cells are formed by self-duplication rather than stem-cell differentiation. Nature. 2004;429:41–46. doi: 10.1038/nature02520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dressler GR. Advances in early kidney specification, development and patterning. Development (Cambridge, England) 2009;136:3863–3874. doi: 10.1242/dev.034876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Duffield JS, Humphreys BD. Origin of new cells in the adult kidney: results from genetic labeling techniques. Kidney Int. 2011;79:494–501. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Duffield JS. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in injury of solid organs: fact or artifact? Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1081–1083. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Harari-Steinberg O, et al. Identification of human nephron progenitors capable of generation of kidney structures and functional repair of chronic renal disease. EMBO Mol Med. 2013;5:1556–1568. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201201584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hartman HA, Lai HL, Patterson LT. Cessation of renal morphogenesis in mice. Developmental biology. 2007;310:379–387. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Herzlinger D, Koseki C, Mikawa T, al-Awqati Q. Metanephric mesenchyme contains multipotent stem cells whose fate is restricted after induction. Development (Cambridge, England) 1992;114:565–572. doi: 10.1242/dev.114.3.565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Humphreys BD, et al. Intrinsic epithelial cells repair the kidney after injury. Cell stem cell. 2008;2:284–291. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Humphreys BD, et al. Fate tracing reveals the pericyte and not epithelial origin of myofibroblasts in kidney fibrosis. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:85–97. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Humphreys BD, et al. Repair of injured proximal tubule does not involve specialized progenitors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:9226–9231. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100629108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kaufman JM, Hardy R, Hayslett JP. Age-dependent characteristics of compensatory renal growth. Kidney international. 1975;8:21–26. doi: 10.1038/ki.1975.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Klootwijk ED, et al. Mistargeting of peroxisomal EHHADH and inherited renal Fanconi’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:129–138. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1307581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kobayashi A, et al. Six2 defines and regulates a multipotent self-renewing nephron progenitor population throughout mammalian kidney development. Cell stem cell. 2008;3:169–181. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.05.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kusaba T, Lalli M, Kramann R, Kobayashi A, Humphreys BD. Differentiated kidney epithelial cells repair injured proximal tubule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:1527–1532. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310653110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Laitinen L, Virtanen I, Saxén L. Changes in the glycosylation pattern during embryonic development of mouse kidney as revealed with lectin conjugates. J Histochem Cytochem. 1987;35:55–65. doi: 10.1177/35.1.3794309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Little MH. Regrow or repair: potential regenerative therapies for the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:2390–2401. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006030218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lustig B, et al. Negative feedback loop of Wnt signaling through upregulation of conductin/axin2 in colorectal and liver tumors. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:1184–1193. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.4.1184-1193.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Maeshima A, Sakurai H, Nigam SK. Adult kidney tubular cell population showing phenotypic plasticity, tubulogenic capacity, and integration capability into developing kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:188–198. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005040370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Massengale M, Wagers AJ, Vogel H, Weissman IL. Hematopoietic cells maintain hematopoietic fates upon entering the brain. J Exp Med. 2005;201:1579–1589. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Muzumdar MD, Tasic B, Miyamichi K, Li L, Luo L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis. 2007;45:593–605. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Oliver JA, Maarouf O, Cheema FH, Martens TP, Al-Awqati Q. The renal papilla is a niche for adult kidney stem cells. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2004;114:795–804. doi: 10.1172/JCI20921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ootani A, et al. Sustained in vitro intestinal epithelial culture within a Wnt-dependent stem cell niche. Nature medicine. 2009;15:701–706. doi: 10.1038/nm.1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pleniceanu O, Harari-Steinberg O, Dekel B. Concise review: Kidney stem/progenitor cells: differentiate, sort out, or reprogram? Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio) 2010;28:1649–1660. doi: 10.1002/stem.486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Prescott LF. The normal urinary excretion rates of renal tubular cells, leucocytes and red blood cells. Clinical science. 1966;31:425–435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rinkevich Y, Lindau P, Ueno H, Longaker MT, Weissman IL. Germ-layer and lineage-restricted stem/progenitors regenerate the mouse digit tip. Nature. 2011;476:409–413. doi: 10.1038/nature10346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rinkevich Y, et al. Identification and prospective isolation of a mesothelial precursor lineage giving rise to smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts for mammalian internal organs, and their vasculature. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:1251–1260. doi: 10.1038/ncb2610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rosenblum ND. Developmental biology of the human kidney. Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine. 2008;13:125–132. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2007.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sagrinati C, et al. Isolation and characterization of multipotent progenitor cells from the Bowman’s capsule of adult human kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:2443–2456. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006010089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schafer JA, et al. A simplified method for isolation of large numbers of defined nephron segments. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:F650–F657. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1997.273.4.F650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Singh SR, Liu W, Hou SX. The adult Drosophila malpighian tubules are maintained by multipotent stem cells. Cell stem cell. 2007;1:191–203. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Spira EM, Jacobi C, Frankenschmidt A, Pohl M, von Schnakenburg C. Sonographic long-term study: paediatric growth charts for single kidneys. Archives of disease in childhood. 2009;94:693–698. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.153601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ueno H, Weissman IL. Clonal analysis of mouse development reveals a polyclonal origin for yolk sac blood islands. Developmental cell. 2006;11:519–533. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Valladares-Ayerbes M, et al. Origin of renal cell carcinomas. Clin Transl Oncol. 2008;10:697–712. doi: 10.1007/s12094-008-0276-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Van Amerongen R, Bowman AN, Nusse R. Developmental stage and time dictate the fate of Wnt/β-catenin-responsive stem cells in the mammary gland. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;11:387–400. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wagers AJ, Sherwood RI, Christensen JL, Weissman IL. Little evidence for developmental plasticity of adult hematopoietic stem cells. Science. 2002;297:2256–2259. doi: 10.1126/science.1074807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wagers AJ, Weissman IL. Plasticity of adult stem cells. Cell. 2004;116:639–648. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00208-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Witzgall R, Brown D, Schwarz C, Bonventre JV. Localization of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, vimentin, c-Fos, and clusterin in the postischemic kidney. Evidence for a heterogenous genetic response among nephron segments, and a large pool of mitotically active and dedifferentiated cells. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1994;93:2175–2188. doi: 10.1172/JCI117214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2

RESOURCES