Skip to main content
Korean Journal of Urology logoLink to Korean Journal of Urology
. 2015 May 4;56(5):405–408. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.5.405

Knotted stents: Case report and outcome analysis

Min Su Kim 1,, Ha Na Lee 1, Hokyeong Hwang 2
PMCID: PMC4426514  PMID: 25964843

Abstract

A knotted ureteral stent is an extremely rare condition, with fewer than 20 cases reported in the literature; however, it is difficult to treat. We report a case in which a folded Terumo guidewire was successfully used to remove a knotted stent percutaneously without anesthesia. We also review the current literature on predisposing factors and management strategies for knotted ureteral stents.

Keywords: Stents, Ureter, Urolithiasis

INTRODUCTION

Ureteral stenting was first described by Zimskind et al. [1] in 1967 and is widely used in contemporary urologic practice. Indications for ureteral stents include the relief of ureteral obstruction with or without stone, stricture, identification of the ureter during a surgical procedure, and protection of ureteral anastomosis in urinary diversion. However, the use of an indwelling ureteral stent can cause many complications, ranging from mild (hematuria, irritative urinary symptom, vesico-ureteral reflex, and recurrent urinary tract infection) to severe (stent migration, encrustation, ureteral perforation, erosion, and fistula) [2]. One extremely rare complication is knot formation of an indwelling stent in the ureter. To our knowledge, only 20 cases of knotted ureteral stent have been described in the literature. We present a case in which a Terumo guidewire was successfully used to remove a knotted stent percutaneously without anesthesia. We also review the current literature on predisposing factors and management strategies for knotted stents.

CASE REPORT

A 53-year-old man with gout and chronic renal disease was admitted to the hospital because of right flank pain, nausea, vomiting, and fever. A 2.0-cm renal stone in the lower calyx and a 0.4-cm stone in the upper ureter without hydronephrosis were identified on computed tomography images (Fig. 1). The patient was treated with antibiotics and underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy and stent placement to decompress the infected kidney and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) of the renal stone (Fig. 2A, B). After the signs of infection subsided and the uropathy improved (changes in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein from 22.2 to 2.75 mg/dL and in creatinine from 3.6 to 1.7 mg/dL), we performed several sessions of ESWL on the right renal stone. Two months later, we found Steinstrasse around the stent (Fig. 2C). We attempted to change the stent but failed to remove it because of resistance. We therefore checked for an encrusted stent by x-ray and computed tomography, which revealed a knotted stent and Steinstrasse (Fig. 2D). The patient refused general or spinal anesthesia, so the stent was removed percutaneously under local anesthesia.

Fig. 1. Coronal scans obtained via nonenhanced computed tomography. A 0.4-cm upperureteral stone with no hydronephrosis (A: blue arrow) and a 2.0-cm renal stone in lower calyx (B: blue arrow) were identified.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2. X-ray images of the kidney, ureter, and bladder. (A) Pretreatment (upper arrow: renal stone, lower arrow: upper ureteral stone). (B) Immediately after insertion of a double-J stent. (C) Steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (blue arrow: steinstrasse). (D) Knot formation (blue arrow: knott).

Fig. 2

We inserted a 7-French angio sheath using ultrasonographic and fluoroscopic guidance and then inserted a KMP (Beacon Tip Torcon NB advantage angiographic catheter, Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) catheter. Finally, a folded 0.018 Terumo guidewire was inserted into the area of knot formation through the KMP catheter. The knotted stent was caught in the folded guidewire and removed percutaneously. Subsequently, an 8.5-French pigtail catheter was inserted in the kidney (Fig. 3). After several sessions of ESWL performed within 2 weeks of the surgical procedure, the remnant stone and Steinstrasse were completely eliminated and the pigtail catheter was removed.

Fig. 3. Fluoroscopic images of antegrade ureteral stent removal. A 7-French angio sheath was inserted under ultrasonographic and fluoroscopic guidance, and the KMP (Beacon Tip Torcon NB advantage angiographic catheter, Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) catheter was inserted through the sheath. (A) A folded 0.018 Terumo guidewire was inserted in the area of the knot formation through the KMP catheter. (B) The knotted stent was caught in the folded guidewire and was removed percutaneously. After the procedure, an 8.5-French pigtail catheter was inserted in the kidney.

Fig. 3

DISCUSSION

Formation of a knotted ureteral stent was first described by Groeneveld in 1989 [3]. To date, 20 such cases have been reported and several treatment methods have been described. Our analysis of previous reports of knotted stent indicated that the male to female ratio is 3:1 and the mean age is 50 years (range, 4-86 years). The knotted stents were located in the upper ureter in 18 cases, the middle ureter in 2 cases, and the distal ureter in 1 case (Supplementary Table 1) [4,5,6,7,8]. The most common reasons for stent placement were ESWL of a renal stone (9 cases), treatment of upper ureter stone or upper ureter obstruction (7 cases), to aid with anastomosis of the ureter (2 cases), periodic stent substitution (2 cases), and interoperative ureter determination (1 case) (Table 1). In the current case of a 53-year-old man, an indwelling stent was inserted to aid in the removal of a renal stone and to relieve an upper ureteral obstruction.

Table 1. Purpose of stent.

Purpose of stent Number
HN (-) (n=14)
 Renal stone for ESWL 9
 Identification of ureter in operation 1
 Anastomosis 2
 Periodic stent substitution 2
HN (+) (n=7)
 Relief of obstructive uropathy 7
Total 21

HN, hydronephrosis; ESWL, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

The results of our analysis suggest that the excessive length of the stent and/or its coil formation facilitated the knot formation in the ureteral catheter. Ureteral catheter knots form during implantation or removal of the catheter. Analysis of cases with and without hydronephrosis before insertion of an upper ureteral stent paradoxically showed that knot formation occurred in 13 cases with no hydronephrosis (Table 1), which suggests that knot formation occurs more often in cases with no hydronephrosis. Therefore, physicians should pay greater attention to insertion or removal of a ureteral stent in patients without than in those with hydronephrosis. If possible, performing the procedure with the aid of fluoroscopic imaging may help prevent knot formation.

Various techniques have been used to assist with the removal of knotted ureteral catheters, such as gentle traction (9 cases), percutaneous extraction (4 cases), extraction via ureteroscopy (6 cases), extraction using a guidewire (1 case), and open ureterotomy (1 case) (Table 2). Of nine patients treated using a gentle traction method, the stent was gently extracted in five patients and by abdominal pressure under anesthesia in one patient. In one reported case, the knotted stent was extracted by anchoring the end of the stent at the leg. In another case, the stent was extracted after waiting for status of the percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN). In one case, stent removal was achieved by injecting petroleum jelly in the ureterocutaneostomy [5]. However, ureteral avulsion is a potential risk of these techniques.

Table 2. Strategy used for knotted stent.

Method Number
Gentle traction (n=9)
 Simple 5
 Valsalva 1
 3 Days continuous 1
 PCN 3 weeks later 1
 Vaseline 1
URS (n=6)
 Traction (with forceps) 3
 Transection (with Holmium laser) 3
Open (n=1)
 Ureterotomy 1
Percutaneous (n=4)
 Percutaneous 3
 Nephroscope 1
Etc. (n=1)
 Untie (with super stiff guide wire) 1

PCN, percutaneous nephrostomy; URS, ureterorenoscopy.

Cases of ureteroscopic removal of knotted ureteral stents have also been reported. Traction using forceps or a basket was reported in three patients, and cutting with a holmium laser was reported in another three patients (Table 2) [6,7]. When a knotted stent is removed by ureteroscopy, the patient needs to be under general or spinal anesthesia; this procedure has a risk of failure related to ureteral stricture. Hydronephrosis that occurs because of a knotted stent should be resolved in cases of failure by inserting a ureteroscope.

Three cases of percutaneous removal of a knotted ureteral stent were reported: in 1992, 1994, and 2012. In two cases, the knotted stent was removed via PCN [4]. In the remaining case, a nephroscope was used to remove the knotted stent [8] (Table 2). The exact PCN technique used was not specified, but nephroscopy is an invasive technique, requires general anesthesia, and may result in renal injury. Therefore, removal of knotted stents with a simple procedure under local anesthesia is an attractive alternative option.

Reported techniques for removal of a knotted ureteral stent include retrograde gentle traction, untying the knot, cutting the knot, and percutaneous removal. Gentle traction, which is the most common method, can result in ureteral injury. Use of ureteroscopy to untie or cut a knot requires general or spinal anesthesia and possibly a holmiun laser. Percutaneous removal of a knotted stent is a simple and effective method that does not require general or spinal anesthesia and can be performed when the knot is located in the upper portion of the ureteral stent or when hydronephrosis is present. This technique may be a useful treatment option in patients who have difficulties with general or spinal anesthesia and/or in those who do not want to undergo cystoscopy for later removal of a ureteral stent.

Footnotes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: The authors have nothing to disclose.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Scan this QR code to see the supplementary material, or visit http://kjurology.org/src/sm/kju-56-405-s001.pdf.

graphic file with name kju-56-405-g004.jpg

kju-56-405-s001.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)

Supplementary Table 1. Characteristics of knotted stent.

Ref Author Location Knotted location Stent type (F, cm) Sex/age Pathology (purpose of stent) Anesthesia Treatment
1 Groeneveld (1989) Singapore Upper D-J (N/A) N/A Renal stone (for ESWL) L/A Gentle traction
2 Das et al. (1990) UK Distal S-J (N/A) M/45 Renal stone (for ESWL) L/A Gentle traction
3 Braslis et al. (1992) Australia Upper Multilength (4.7F) F/37 Renal pelvis stone: single kidney (for ESWL) G/A URS failed percutaneous nephrostomy
4 Kundargi et al. (1994) India Upper Mutlicoil (6F, 26 cm) M/53 Renal stone : single kidney (for ESWL) L/A Percutaneous Stent removal
5 Flam et al. (1995) France Upper Double pigtail circumflex (6F, 26 cm) M/86 UUS (for relief of obstructive uropathy: too far insertion) G/A 2nd Stent insertion (1 week later)
Untie with URS & 5F alligator forcep
6 Baldwin et al. (1998) USA Upper Mutlilength (7F) M/73 Ureteral TCC: single kidney (for surveillance eureteroscopy) G/A Untie with super stiff guide wire
7 Quek et al. (2002) USA Mid Multicoil (7F, 24 cm) F/66 Upper ureteral stone: cystocele (for relief of obstructive uropthy) L/A Gentle traction (incidentally detected)
8 Corbett et al. (2005) UK Upper Multilength (4.7F) M/4 Megaureter (for ureteroureterostomy) G/A Gentle traction (incidentally detected)
9 Kondo et al. (2005) Japan Upper Multilength (6 F) M/37 Renal stone (for ESWL) G/A Ureterotomy
10 Sighinolfi et al. (2005) Italy Upper Mutlilength (5F) M/48 Staghorn stone (for relief of obstructive uropathy: remnant UUS after PNL) L/A ESWL & 3 days of continuous traction
11 Eisner et al. (2006) USA Upper Multilength (6F) F/82 Renal stone (for ESWL) L/A Gentle traction (Valsalva)
12 Basavaraj et al. (2007) UK Upper Mutilength (6F) F/70 Renal stone, UUS: ileal conduit state d/t bladder cancer (for ESWL of remnant stone after PNL & URSL) L/A PCN 3 weeks later gentle traction
13 Rivalta et al. (2009) Italy Upper Ureteral catheter (7F) M/83 Uretero cutaneous anastomosis (for periodic ureteral stent substitution) L/A Sterile vaseline push-up gentle traction
14 Picozzi et al. (2010) Italy Upper D-J (7F, 26 cm) F/41 Ureteral invasion of endometrosis (for uretero neocystostomy) L/A Gentle traction (slight resistance)
15 Richards et al. (2011) USA Upper D-J M/67 UUS (for relief of obstructive uropathy) G/A Transection with URS & Holmium laser
16 Tempest et al. (2011) UK Upper G/A Transection with URS & Holmium laser
17 Karaguzel et al. (2012) Turkey Upper D-J (4.7F, 28 cm) M/53 UUS (for relief of obstructive uropathy) G/A Gentle traction with URS & foreign body forcep
18 Bhirud et al. (2012) India Mid D-J M/41 Staghorn stone (for remnant stone after PNL) G/A Percutaneous with nephroscope
19 Moufid et al. (2012) Morocco Upper D-J (7F) M/32 UUS (for relief of obstructive uropathy) G/A 2nd D-J stent 3 days later
Gentle traction with URS & basket forcep
20 Nettle et al. (2012) Australia Upper Multilength (6F) M/43 Crohn'sdisease (for Intraoperative identification) G/A Transection with URS & Holmium laser
Present study Korea Upper M/53 Renal stone (for ESWL) L/A Percutaneous removal with folded Termo guide wire

References

  • 1.Zimskind PD, Fetter TR, Wilkerson JL. Clinical use of long-term indwelling silicone rubber ureteral splints inserted cystoscopically. J Urol. 1967;97:840–844. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)63130-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ahallal Y, Khallouk A, El Fassi MJ, Farih MH. Risk factor analysis and management of ureteral double-j stent complications. Rev Urol. 2010;12:e147–e151. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Groeneveld AE. The role of ESWL in the treatment of large kidney stones. Singapore Med J. 1989;30:249–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Picozzi S, Carmignani L. A knotted ureteral stent: A case report and review of the literature. Urol Ann. 2010;2:80–82. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.65108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rivalta M, Sighinolfi MC, Micali S, De Stefani S, Bianchi G. Knotted ureteral catheter in an 83-year-old man: case presentation and urological non-invasive management in the elderly. Urol Res. 2009;37:261–262. doi: 10.1007/s00240-009-0209-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Moufid K, Touiti D, Mohamed L. "Knot stent": an unusual cause of acute renal failure in solitary kidney. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2012;2:36. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.97758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nettle J, Huang JG, Rao R, Costello AJ. Ureteroscopic holmium laser ablation of a knotted ureteral stent. J Endourol. 2012;26:968–970. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bhirud P, Giridhar V, Hegde P. Midureteric knotted stent removed by percutaneous access. Urol Ann. 2012;4:106–107. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.95557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

kju-56-405-s001.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)

Supplementary Table 1. Characteristics of knotted stent.

Ref Author Location Knotted location Stent type (F, cm) Sex/age Pathology (purpose of stent) Anesthesia Treatment
1 Groeneveld (1989) Singapore Upper D-J (N/A) N/A Renal stone (for ESWL) L/A Gentle traction
2 Das et al. (1990) UK Distal S-J (N/A) M/45 Renal stone (for ESWL) L/A Gentle traction
3 Braslis et al. (1992) Australia Upper Multilength (4.7F) F/37 Renal pelvis stone: single kidney (for ESWL) G/A URS failed percutaneous nephrostomy
4 Kundargi et al. (1994) India Upper Mutlicoil (6F, 26 cm) M/53 Renal stone : single kidney (for ESWL) L/A Percutaneous Stent removal
5 Flam et al. (1995) France Upper Double pigtail circumflex (6F, 26 cm) M/86 UUS (for relief of obstructive uropathy: too far insertion) G/A 2nd Stent insertion (1 week later)
Untie with URS & 5F alligator forcep
6 Baldwin et al. (1998) USA Upper Mutlilength (7F) M/73 Ureteral TCC: single kidney (for surveillance eureteroscopy) G/A Untie with super stiff guide wire
7 Quek et al. (2002) USA Mid Multicoil (7F, 24 cm) F/66 Upper ureteral stone: cystocele (for relief of obstructive uropthy) L/A Gentle traction (incidentally detected)
8 Corbett et al. (2005) UK Upper Multilength (4.7F) M/4 Megaureter (for ureteroureterostomy) G/A Gentle traction (incidentally detected)
9 Kondo et al. (2005) Japan Upper Multilength (6 F) M/37 Renal stone (for ESWL) G/A Ureterotomy
10 Sighinolfi et al. (2005) Italy Upper Mutlilength (5F) M/48 Staghorn stone (for relief of obstructive uropathy: remnant UUS after PNL) L/A ESWL & 3 days of continuous traction
11 Eisner et al. (2006) USA Upper Multilength (6F) F/82 Renal stone (for ESWL) L/A Gentle traction (Valsalva)
12 Basavaraj et al. (2007) UK Upper Mutilength (6F) F/70 Renal stone, UUS: ileal conduit state d/t bladder cancer (for ESWL of remnant stone after PNL & URSL) L/A PCN 3 weeks later gentle traction
13 Rivalta et al. (2009) Italy Upper Ureteral catheter (7F) M/83 Uretero cutaneous anastomosis (for periodic ureteral stent substitution) L/A Sterile vaseline push-up gentle traction
14 Picozzi et al. (2010) Italy Upper D-J (7F, 26 cm) F/41 Ureteral invasion of endometrosis (for uretero neocystostomy) L/A Gentle traction (slight resistance)
15 Richards et al. (2011) USA Upper D-J M/67 UUS (for relief of obstructive uropathy) G/A Transection with URS & Holmium laser
16 Tempest et al. (2011) UK Upper G/A Transection with URS & Holmium laser
17 Karaguzel et al. (2012) Turkey Upper D-J (4.7F, 28 cm) M/53 UUS (for relief of obstructive uropathy) G/A Gentle traction with URS & foreign body forcep
18 Bhirud et al. (2012) India Mid D-J M/41 Staghorn stone (for remnant stone after PNL) G/A Percutaneous with nephroscope
19 Moufid et al. (2012) Morocco Upper D-J (7F) M/32 UUS (for relief of obstructive uropathy) G/A 2nd D-J stent 3 days later
Gentle traction with URS & basket forcep
20 Nettle et al. (2012) Australia Upper Multilength (6F) M/43 Crohn'sdisease (for Intraoperative identification) G/A Transection with URS & Holmium laser
Present study Korea Upper M/53 Renal stone (for ESWL) L/A Percutaneous removal with folded Termo guide wire

Articles from Korean Journal of Urology are provided here courtesy of Korean Urological Association

RESOURCES