Abstract
Background. Ocular manifestations in people living with HIV/AIDS are varied and affect almost all the structures of eye leading to visual impairment or blindness. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the predictors of HIV related ocular manifestation among ART clinic clients. Methods. Institution based cross-sectional study was employed among ART clients at Felege Hiwot referral hospital, northwest Ethiopia. The study was conducted from 1 January 2013 to 30 January 2013. A total of 369 systematically and randomly selected clients were included in the study. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and ophthalmologic clinical examination. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 16.0. Binary and multivariable logistic regression analyses were computed to identify independent predictors of HIV related ocular manifestation. Results. Twenty-five percent (25.7%) of HIV patients had ocular manifestations. The three most frequent signs were Squamoid Conjuctival growth (26.9%), ophthalmic herpes zoster (22.1%), and Bacterial Conjuctivitis (17.2%). History of eye problem, CD4 count, and visual acuity of the eye were the predictors of HIV related ocular manifestation. Conclusion. In this study, a higher proportion of ocular manifestations were detected in HIV/AIDS patients. Visual acuity and CD4 counts were the independent predictors of ocular manifestations. This finding gives an insight for policy makers and concerned body to integrate ophthalmic examination in ART clinics to improve the health condition of HIV/ADIS patients.
1. Introduction
Ocular manifestations among people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) are varied and affect almost all the structures of the eye. Approximately 70–80% of HIV-infected patients are expected and treated for HIV related eye disorder during the course of their illness [1]. The life time risk of having at least one abnormal ocular lesion among HIV patients ranges from 52% to 100% [2–4]. Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries are disproportionately hit by the virus accounting for the largest burden of HIV/AIDS; by 2008, about 22.4 million (20.8–24.1) people were living in the region [5]. Ethiopia is one of those countries affected by HIV with 1.4% of its more than 80 million population infected with HIV [6].
HIV affects the immune system that the virus can either directly inflict damage to the organs of the body by itself and/or make the organs vulnerable to many opportunistic pathogens and diseases. There are wide arrays of diseases affecting the eyes of people living with HIV/AIDS that can occur at any time along the natural course of the disease. HIV related ophthalmic disorders occur due to several causes like opportunistic infections, vascular abnormalities, neoplasm, and drug induced and neuroophthalmic lesions. Among them, opportunistic infections are the major cause of morbidity and the most devastating ophthalmic disorder in people with AIDS [7, 8]. HIV-cytomegalovirus (CMV) coinfection occurs in 75–85% of patients, more than half of which develop CMV retinitis which is vision threatening. Despite this high incidence, difficulties concerning the therapeutic approach and the result are relatively unsatisfactory even with the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) [9]. On top of this, there is a 63% risk of immune recovery uveitis (IRU) in patients with regressed CMV retinitis [10, 11].
In SSA, the prevalence of ocular disease in HIV-positive individuals was between 30% and 45% [12, 13]. The spectrum of ocular diseases in HIV-infected patients in developing countries is different from that in developed countries [4, 14]. Most notably, while antibodies against CMV are detectable in 90% of people living with HIV/ADIS, CMV retinitis was rare (less than 5%) in AIDS patients in developing countries [15, 16]. Ocular manifestations affecting only one eye like herpes zoster ophthalmicus and conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma are, however, relatively common in developing countries [15, 16]. The reasons for such variations in the distribution were presumed to be the early and high mortality rate in people living with HIV/AIDS in developing countries and possibly differences in HIV subtype, race, and the influence of comorbid diseases.
Few studies in Ethiopia showed that the occurrence of at least one ocular manifestation was estimated between 32–60% among HIV/AIDS patients [17, 18]. CD4 count was mentioned as predictor of ocular infections in patients who are living with HIV. Many findings claimed that CD4 + count less than 100 cells/μL was consistently associated with ocular manifestations in HIV-positive patients [17–23].
In Ethiopia, only few studies were done with patterns of ocular manifestation among HIV patients. However, there is scanty of credible evidence on predictors of ocular manifestation among these vulnerable groups and the existing findings are not exhaustively included in the independent variables such as WHO clinical stage of HIV/AIDS. Data on ocular manifestation among HIV patients and its relation with CD4 count will help policy makers, other concerned bodies, and clinicians to integrate new strategy with ART strategies and provide evidence based clinical practice. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with ocular manifestations among HIV/AIDS patients in Felege Hiwot referral hospital.
2. Methods and Materials
2.1. Study Design and Setting
Institution based cross-sectional study was employed among ART clients at Felege Hiwot referral hospital, Amhara region, northwest Ethiopia. The study was conducted from 1 January 2013 to 30 January 2013. The ART clinic at Felege Hiwot referral hospital is one of the largest in Amhara region, which has been serving more than 400 patients per week. All ART clients during the study period at Felege Hiwot hospital were the source population.
2.1.1. Sample Size and Sampling Technique
The sample size was determined using single proportion formula with the following assumptions: estimated proportion of ocular manifestation of 60% (p = 0.60) [18], 95% CI (Z α/2 = 1.96), and a 5% margin of error (d = 0.05). The final sample size was 388 by including 5% nonresponse rate. Study participants were selected using a systematic random sampling technique in the ART clinic of the Felege Hiwot hospital. A cue note was attached on identity card to avoid double counting during the study period.
2.1.2. Data Collection Tools
Structured questionnaire was used to collect sociodemographic data and volunteer participants had undergone ophthalmologic examination for possible HIV related ophthalmologic manifestations. The findings from the eye clinical examinations and their recent CD4 counts were recorded using a prepared data recording format sheet at ART clinic. For patients who did not have a CD4 count within the last three months, CD4 count was done during the study. Thorough examination of the eyes, including external eye inspection, ocular motility, and slit lamp examination of the external eye, as well as pupils, lens, and the anterior vitreous was done for all the patients. Posterior segment was evaluated by dilating pupils and examining using indirect Ophthalmoscope and/or 90D Volk lens. Squamoid type conjunctival growth was clinically defined as a suspicious conjunctival mass on slit lump exam though histology was not done due to lack of facility during the study period. Blindness was defined as visual acuity (VA) of less than counting finger (CF) at three meters with the better eye. Visual acuity of less than 6/18 was defined as visual impairment.
2.1.3. Data Quality
Questionnaire was pretested to ensure whether the study participants understood what the investigators intended to know. The questionnaire was modified based on the pertest result. Second opinion was sought from another ophthalmologist as a means of quality control specially in cases of eyes with squamoid growth. Data collection procedure and data collection format were discussed with data collectors. Moreover, proper functionality of materials used for clinical eye examination was checked daily before the examination.
2.1.4. Data Analysis
Questionnaires were coded and data were entered and analyzed using SPSS software version 16. Descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analyses were carried out to describe variables and to identify factors associated with ocular manifestation, respectively. Backward stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify multicollinearity free predictors of ocular manifestation. Crude and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated as cut-off point to identify the predictors of ocular manifestations.
2.1.5. Ethical Statement
Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Clearance Committee of Bahir Dar University. Permission was taken from the Regional Health Bureau as well from Hospital administration. Informed and written consents were obtained from the study participants. Privacy and confidentiality were maintained throughout the study period; each questionnaire was number-coded without any personal identification. Intervention measures such as health education, detailed counselling, and medical therapy were provided whenever necessary during data collection. Those who needed surgical intervention and further eye follow-up were referred to the hospital's Eye Unit. All eye drops used for examination were all the ones registered by Drug Administration and Control Authority (DACA) for use in Ethiopia. The effects of drugs used were explained to the patients and data collected were kept confidential.
3. Results
A total of 370 clients were included in the study with the response rate of 95%. One hundred and thirty-nine (37.8%) were males. The mean (SD) age of the respondents was 32.5 (8.7) years. Two hundred and thirty (62.3%) were urban residents and 29.7% were daily laborers. The majority (93.8%) of the study participants were Orthodox Christian, 19.5% were single, and one-third of the study participants were unable to read and write (Table 1).
Table 1.
Variable | Total study subject | |
---|---|---|
Number (370) | Percent | |
Sex | ||
Male | 140 | 37.8 |
Female | 230 | 62.2 |
Age | ||
<28 | 90 | 24.3 |
28–30 | 94 | 25.4 |
31–37 | 88 | 23.8 |
>37 | 98 | 26.5 |
Occupational status | ||
Daily labourer | 110 | 29.7 |
Student | 14 | 3.8 |
Government employee | 88 | 23.8 |
Housewife | 45 | 12.2 |
Merchant | 28 | 7.6 |
Unemployed | 37 | 10.0 |
Self-employee | 32 | 8.6 |
Others | 16 | 4.3 |
Residence | ||
Urban | 230 | 62.2 |
Rural | 140 | 37.8 |
Religion | ||
Orthodox | 346 | 93.8 |
Muslim | 20 | 5.4 |
Protestant | 3 | 0.8 |
Marital status | ||
Single | 72 | 19.5 |
Married | 187 | 50.5 |
Separated | 44 | 11.9 |
Widowed | 7 | 1.9 |
Divorced | 60 | 16.2 |
Education status | ||
Uneducated | 122 | 33.1 |
Read and write | 24 | 6.5 |
1 to 6 grade | 58 | 15.7 |
7 to 12 grade | 100 | 27.1 |
Above 12 grade | 66 | 17.8 |
3.1. Clinical Characteristics of HIV/AIDS Patients
A majority, 267 (74.1%), of participants were on WHO clinical stage III. Ninety-eight percent (98%) of the study participants were on ART at the time of the study and 37% of the study participants have taken ART for more than five years. Seventy-nine percent of the study participants had a recent CD4 count of 200 and above. About 25.4% of the participants had a history of eye problem. Almost ninety percent of the study participants (89.2%) were found to have normal visual acuity and 25.7% of the study participants had at least one sign of the ocular manifestation (Table 2).
Table 2.
Variable | Number | Percent |
---|---|---|
WHO clinical stage of HIV/AIDS | ||
Stage I | 31 | 8.4 |
Stage II | 51 | 13.8 |
Stage III | 274 | 74.1 |
Stage IV | 14 | 3.8 |
Duration of HIV in years | ||
<5 years | 185 | 50.0 |
185 | 50.0 | |
Duration of ART in years | ||
233 | 63.0 | |
137 | 37.0 | |
CD4 count | ||
77 | 20.8 | |
293 | 79.2 | |
On ART | ||
Yes | 363 | 98.1 |
No | 7 | 1.9 |
History of eye problem | ||
Yes | 94 | 25.4 |
No | 276 | 74.6 |
Visual acuity of both eyes | ||
Normal | 330 | 89.2 |
Visual impairment | 40 | 11.1 |
At least one sign of ocular manifestation (n = 369) | ||
Yes | 95 | 25.7 |
No | 275 | 74.3 |
3.2. Type of HIV/AIDS Associated Ocular Manifestations
The most frequent ocular manifestations were squamoid conjunctival growth (26.9%) and ophthalmic herpes zoster (22.1%). Molluscum contagiosum (0.7%) and vernal conjunctivitis (0.7%) were among the less frequent ocular manifestations (Table 3).
Table 3.
Ocular manifestation | Frequency | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Squamoid conjunctival growth | 39 | 26.9 |
Ophthalmic herpes zoster | 32 | 22.1 |
Bacterial conjunctivitis | 25 | 17.2 |
Microvasculopathy (RM) (early retinal discharge) | 22 | 15.2 |
Seborrheic blepharitis | 9 | 6.2 |
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis | 7 | 4.8 |
Uveitis | 4 | 2.8 |
Neuroophthalmic disorders∗ | 3 | 2.1 |
Xanthelasma | 2 | 1.4 |
Molluscum contagiosum | 1 | 0.7 |
Vernal conjunctivitis | 1 | 0.7 |
∗Optic atrophy and papilledema were the cases.
3.3. Predictors of HIV/AIDS Related Ocular Manifestations
In this study, history of eye problem, CD4 count, and visual acuity of the eye were factors associated with HIV/AIDS related ocular manifestation. After controlling confounding factors and interaction effect of the variables using backward stepwise regression, history of eye problem, CD4 count, and visual acuity of the eye remained statistically significant predictors of HIV/AIDS related ocular manifestation among HIV/AIDS patients (Table 4).
Table 4.
Variable | Ocular manifestation | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Yes | No | |||
Sex | ||||
Male | 38 | 102 | 1.13 (0.70–1.83) | |
Female | 57 | 173 | 1.00 | |
Age | ||||
25 | 66 | 1.00 | ||
28–30 | 18 | 76 | 0.63 (0.81–3.24) | |
31–37 | 21 | 66 | 0.73 (0.59–2.25) | |
31 | 67 | 1.22 (0.46–1.61) | ||
Residence | ||||
Urban | 59 | 171 | 1.00 | |
Rural | 36 | 104 | 1.00 (0.61–1.61) | |
Religion | ||||
Orthodox | 89 | 258 | 0.69 (0.37–2.93) | |
Muslim | 5 | 15 | 0.67 (0.06–7.70) | |
Protestant | 1 | 2 | 1.00 | |
Marital status | ||||
Single | 14 | 58 | 1.00 | |
Married | 49 | 138 | 1.47 (0.33–1.24) | |
Widowed | 15 | 29 | 2.14 (0.24–1.38) | |
Separated | 1 | 6 | 0.69 (0.16–13.02) | |
Divorced | 16 | 44 | 1.50 (0.29–2.50) | |
Education status | ||||
Uneducated | 34 | 88 | 1.00 | |
Read and write | 8 | 16 | 1.29 (0.30–1.97) | |
1 to 6 grade | 13 | 45 | 0.75 (0.64–2.78) | |
7 to 12 grade | 23 | 77 | 0.77 (0.70–2.38) | |
Above 12 grade | 17 | 49 | 0.78 (0.55–2.15) | |
WHO clinical stage | ||||
Stage I | 9 | 22 | 1.00 | |
Stage II | 10 | 41 | 0.60 (0.21, 1.69) | |
Stage III | 69 | 205 | 0.82 (0.36, 1.87) | |
Stage IV | 7 | 7 | 2.44 (0.59, 4.74) | |
Duration of HIV | ||||
53 | 132 | 1.37 (0.86, 2.19) | ||
42 | 143 | 1.00 | ||
History of eye problem | ||||
Yes | 66 | 28 | 20.08 (11.17–36.07)∗∗ | 11.26 (5.87, 21.68)∗∗ |
No | 29 | 247 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
CD4 count | ||||
55 | 22 | 15.81 (8.71, 28.71)∗∗ | 7.42 (3.62, 15.21)∗∗ | |
40 | 253 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
On ART | ||||
Yes | 94 | 269 | 1.00 | |
No | 1 | 6 | 0.48 (0.06–4.01) | |
Visual acuity of both eyes | ||||
Normal | 64 | 266 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Visual impairment | 31 | 9 | 14.32 (6.49–31.57)∗∗ | 3.83 (1.38, 10.62)∗ |
∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.001.
Therefore, in this study, those who reported to have a history of eye problem {AOR: 11.26, 95% CI: (5.87, 21.68)} were 11 times more likely to develop ocular manifestation compared to clients who did not report history of eye problem. Those clients who had a recent CD4 count of <200 {AOR: 7.42, 95% CI: (3.62, 15.21)} were 7.42 times more likely to develop ocular manifestation than those clients who had a CD4 count of >200. Similarly, those clients who had a visual impairment {AOR: 3.83, 95% CI: (1.38, 10.62)} were 3.83 times more likely to have HIV/AIDS related ocular manifestation than those who had normal visual acuity (Table 4).
4. Discussion
In this study, the prevalence of ocular manifestation was 25.7%, which is consistent with recent studies done in Jimma in 2009 (25.3%) [24] and in Gondar in 2010 (21.4%), Ethiopia [25]. However, it is much lower than the previous study conducted at Gondar University Hospital in 2004 which was 60% [18]. This discrepancy could be due to the introduction and use of HARRT in ART clinics and difference in the nature of the study population. At Gondar referral hospital, the study was carried out on admitted patients in hospital with a medical problem and on those who came to the eye clinic with ocular complaint, while our study included randomly selected individuals in ART clinic.
The most frequent ocular manifestations were squamoid type conjunctival growth (26.9%) and ophthalmic herpes zoster (22.1%), bacterial conjunctivitis (17.2%), and microvaculopathy (RM) (15.2%) which is consistent with findings in other studies done in Gondar and Jimma, Ethiopia [24, 25]. In studies done in other African countries, the proportion of microvaculopathy was reported in the range of 10–42% [26, 27] and, moreover, in India [28] it was reported that 50% of the study participants had microvaculopathy which is higher than the results of this study. This difference may be due to the potential genetic or other differences in the study populations in ART clinics.
Three-fourth of the study participants (77.9%) in this study were in WHO stages III and IV, which is a lower figure from the study done in Gondar referral hospital (90%) [18]. The difference is due to the fact that the Gondar study participants were mainly critically ill and admitted patients while ours are OPD ART followers who are potentially in a better health status.
It was found that a higher proportion (58%) of those patients whose CD4 count <200 were more likely to have ocular manifestation than those patients whose CD4 count >200 (42%). This finding is consistent with the general facts of immunosuppression and is consistent with the results of the other studies in Ethiopia (Jimma) [24] and India [28]. Similarly, we found that lower CD4 count (of less than 200) was statistically significant predictor of ocular manifestations which is consistent with the study done in Jimma [24].
The proportion of patients with low duration on ART had a high occurrence of ocular manifestations compared to their counterparts because ART drugs may have a role in increasing the CD4 counts and boosting the immunity status of patients which reduce the occurrence of opportunistic infections. Similarly, in this study we found that the proportion of ocular manifestations was higher in patients with advanced stage of the disease (stages III and IV). The above finding is consistent with other studies [24].
History of eye problem was also statistically significantly associated with ocular manifestations in this study which is consistent with the study done in Gondar [18]. Moreover, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that an impaired visual acuity (less than normal V/A) was found to be an independent predictor for ocular manifestations which is consistent with the finding in Gondar, Ethiopia [18].
5. Conclusions
The proportion of ocular manifestations among HIV/AIDS patients was high in this study. Higher proportions of ocular manifestations were detected in HIV/AIDS patients with low CD4 counts and low duration on ART and in advanced stage of the diseases. Low visual acuity, history of eye problem, and CD4 counts were the independent predictors of ocular manifestations. The routine current practice at ART clinics used CD4 counts as a reminder for occurrence of opportunistic infections. It would be advisable to use ocular manifestations as indicators among the many OI for the patient to be aware. Moreover, this finding gives an insight for policy makers and concerned body to integrate ophthalmic examination in ART clinics to improve the health condition of HIV/ADIS patients, if the patient may late to present to eye clinic for intervention. During data collection those who had CMV retinitis were referred to eye department, but it was not possible to find any treatment options for CMV neither in the hospital pharmacy nor in the town. So this finding could fill the information gap and it may also give a clue for suppliers to start providing some treatment or medications for ocular opportunistic infections.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Bahir Dar University for financing this research work. The authors would like to thank the commitment and cooperation of the ART clinic staff at FHRH during data collection and study participants for their willingness to participate in the study. The authors also thank the staff of College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, for their constructive comments during proposal conception.
Abbreviations
- AIDS:
Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
- AOR:
Adjusted odds ratio
- ART:
Antiretroviral therapy
- CD:
Cluster of differentiation
- CI:
Confidence interval
- CMV:
Cytomegalovirus
- COR:
Crude odds ratio
- HAART:
Highly active antiretroviral therapy
- HIV:
Human immunodeficiency virus
- HZO:
Herpes zoster ophthalmicus
- SPSS:
Statistical packages for Social Science
- SSA:
Sub-Saharan African countries
- OI:
Opportunistic infections.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' Contributions
Guadie Sharew participated in design and conception, supervised the data collection and interpretation of data, and revised the paper. Muluken Azage conceived, designed, and analyzed the data and wrote the first draft paper. All authors read and approved the final paper.
References
- 1.Copeland R. Ocular Manifestations of HIV Infection on Medscape. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1216172-overview.
- 2.Biswas J., Rao N., Irvine R. Diagnosis and management of ocular manifestation in AIDS. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 1988;36:151–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rao N. A. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and its ocular complications. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology. 1994;42(2):51–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cunningham E. T., Jr., Margolis T. P. Ocular manifestations of HIV infection. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1998;339(4):236–244. doi: 10.1056/nejm199807233390406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.UNAIDS/WHO. AIDS Epidemic Update December 2009. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS, WHO; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Central Statistical Agency (CSA) Demographic and Health Survey 2005. Calverton, Md, USA: CSA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; ORC Macro; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Holbrook J. T., Jabs D. A., Weinberg D. V., Lewis R. A., Davis M. D., Friedberg D. Visual loss in patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome before widespread availability of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2003;121(1):99–107. doi: 10.1001/archopht.121.1.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ng W. T., Versace P. Ocular association of HIV infection in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy and the global perspective. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2005;33(3):317–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2005.01001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rabadão E., Duque V., Meliço-Silvestre A. Treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in human immunodeficiency virus infected patients. Acta Medica Portuguesa. 1999;12(4–6):203–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Goldberg D. E., Smithen L. M., Angelilli A., Freeman W. R. HIV-associated retinopathy in the HAART era. Retina. 2005;25(5):633–682. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200507000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Roels P. Ocular manifestations of AIDS: new considerations for patients using highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) Optometry. 2004;75(10):624–628. doi: 10.1016/s1529-1839(04)70209-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schuman J. S., Orellana J., Friedman A. H., Teich S. A. Acquired Immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) Survey of Ophthalmology. 1987;31(6):384–410. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(87)90031-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lewallen S., Courtright P. HIV and AIDS and the eye in developing countries: a review. Archives of Ophthalmology. 1997;115(10):1291–1295. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100160461014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kestelyn P. G., Cunningham E. T., Jr. HIV/AIDS and blindness. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2001;79(3):208–213. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lewallen S. Herpes zoster ophthalmicus in Malawi. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(11):1801–1804. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31099-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ateenyl-Agaba C. Conjunctival squamous-cell carcinoma associated with HIV infection in Kampala, Uganda. The Lancet. 1995;345(8951):695–696. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90870-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.T/Giorgis A., Melka F., Mariam A. Ophthalmic manifestation of aids in Armed Forces General Teaching Hospital, Addis Ababa. Ethiopian Medical Journal. 2007;45(4):327–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Assefa Y., Yohannes A., Melesi A. Ocular manisestations of HIV/AIDS patients in Gondar University Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development. 2009;20(3):166–169. doi: 10.4314/ejhd.v20i3.46842. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Otiti-Sengeri J., Colebunders R., Kempen J. H., Ronald A., Sande M., Katabira E. The prevalence and causes of visual loss among HIV-infected individuals in uganda. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2010;53(1):95–101. doi: 10.1097/qai.0b013e3181c313f0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Shah S. U., Kerkar S. P., Pazare A. R. Evaluation of ocular manifestations and blindness in HIV/AIDS patients on HAART in a tertiary care hospital in western India. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2009;93(1):88–90. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.149237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Upadhyay A. K., Vichare M. N. Ocular lesions associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2010;66(3):235–238. doi: 10.1016/s0377-1237(10)80045-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bhatia R. Ophthalmic manifestations of AIDS. Journal, Indian Academy of Clinical Medicine. 2002;3(1):85–88. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pathai S., Deshpande A., Gilbert C., Lawn S. D. Prevalence of HIV-associated ophthalmic disease among patients enrolling for antiretroviral treatment in India: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2009;9, article 158 doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bekele S., Gelaw Y., Tessema F. Ocular manifestation of HIV/AIDS and correlation with CD4+ cells count among adult HIV/AIDS patients in Jimma town, Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. BMC Ophthalmology. 2013;13(1, article 20) doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-13-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Amare B., Admassu F., Assefa Y., Moges B., Ali J., Kassu A. Pattern of ocular manifestation of HIV/ AIDS among patients on HAART in ART clinic of Gondar University Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology. 2011;2, article 192 doi: 10.4172/2155-9570.1000192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kestelyn P. The epidemiology of CMV retinitis in Africa. Ocular Immunology and Inflammation. 1999;7(3-4):173–177. doi: 10.1076/ocii.7.3.173.4002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lewallen S., Kumwenda J., Maher D., Harries A. D. Retinal findings in Malawian patients with AIDS. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 1994;78(10):757–759. doi: 10.1136/bjo.78.10.757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ndoye N. B., Sow P. S., Ba E. A., Ndiaye M. R., Wade A., Coll-Seck A. M. Ocular manifestations of AIDS in Dakar. Dakar Medical. 1993;38(1):97–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]