Abstract
AIM: To prospectively examine the association between presence of Streptococcus bovis (S. bovis) in colonic suction fluid and the endoscopic findings on colonoscopy.
METHODS: From May 2012 to March 2013, 203 consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy for any reason were enrolled in the study. Exclusion criteria included: antibiotic use in the previous month, age younger than 18 years, and inadequate preparation for colonoscopy. The colonoscopy was performed for the total length of the colon or to the occluding tumor. The endoscopic findings were registered. Samples were obtained proximal to the colonoscopic part of the suction tube from each patient and sent to the clinical microbiology laboratory for isolation and identification of S. bovis. Samples were incubated in enrichment media with addition of antibiotic disks for inhibition of growth of Gram-negative rods. The samples were seeded on differential growth media; suspected positive colonies were isolated and identified with Gram staining, catalase, and pyrrolidonyl arylamidase tests, and further identified using a VITEK2 system. Statistical analyses were performed using the Student’s t and χ2 tests.
RESULTS: Of the 203 patients recruited, 49 (24%) patients were found to be S. bovis carriers; of them, the endoscopic findings included: 17 (34.7%) cases with malignant tumors, 11 (22.4%) with large polyps, 5 (10.2%) with medium-sized polyps, 6 (12.2%) with small polyps, 4 (8.1%) with colitis, and 6 (12.2%) normal colonoscopies. Of 154 patients found negative for S. bovis, the endoscopic findings included: none with malignant tumors, 9 (5.8%) cases with large polyps, 11 (7.1%) with medium-sized polyps, 26 (16.9%) with small polyps, 7 (4.5%) with colitis, and 101 (65.6%) normal colonoscopies. S. bovis (Gram-positive coccus) is considered part of the normal intestinal flora. There is an association between S. bovis bacteremia and colonic neoplasia. It is not well understood whether the bacterium has a pathogenetic role in the development of neoplasia or constitutes an epiphenomenon of colorectal neoplasms. There was a clear relationship between positivity for S. bovis in colonic suction fluid and findings of malignant tumors and large polyps in the colon.
CONCLUSION: There is an association between S. bovis bacteremia and malignant colonic lesions; this should prompt for development of a reliable screening method for advanced colonic lesions.
Keywords: Colon cancer, Colonoscopy, Culture, Screening, Streptococcus bovis
Core tip: Currently, there is no available noninvasive, efficient, predictive tool for screening patients in high-risk populations for the purpose of colonoscopy examination. In this prospective study, we show a clear association between the presence of Streptococcus bovis in colonic suction fluid and findings of malignant tumors and large polyps during colonoscopy examination. Stool samples in different forms can be used as screening material for detection of the population at risk for advanced colorectal lesion. This may be preferable to repeated colonoscopy for surveillance in patients who underwent treatment of advanced colonic lesions by endoscopy or surgery.
INTRODUCTION
Streptococcus bovis (S. bovis) is part of the normal flora of the human alimentary tract in 2.5%-15% of individuals[1]. The association between S. bovis bacteremia and colonic neoplasia is well described in the literature[1-4], and all patients with S. bovis bacteremia are advised to undergo investigation to rule out gastrointestinal tract neoplasia[5,6].
It has not yet been determined whether the relation between the bacterium and gastrointestinal neoplasia is etiologic or incidental. Data support the etiologic nature of this relation because of the proinflammatory potential and procarcinogenic properties of S. bovis, including the leukocyte recruitment driven by the bacterium, the tumor tissue-selective adhesion potential of S. bovis, selective colonization of S. bovis in tumor cells, tumor tissue microenvironment suitability for S. bovis proliferation, the local disruption of tumor tissues and capillaries that allow the entry of S. bovis into blood circulation, and the S. bovis-induced cytokines and transcriptional factors[6-9]. Some researchers have postulated that the increased load of S. bovis in the colon might be responsible for its association with colon cancer[1].
Studies that have examined the issue of S. bovis presence in stool and the risk of colorectal cancer have produced conflicting results. A correlation between S. bovis presence in stool and colorectal neoplasia was found in some of the studies[2,4,5], whereas that association was not found in others[6-13].
Our primary goal is a further examination of the nature of that association. We prospectively investigated the association of S. bovis presence in colonic content and the nature of endoscopic findings in colonoscopy of 203 patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patient characteristics
From May 2012 to March 2013, a total of 203 consecutive patients (101 men and 102 women) who underwent colonoscopy for any reason were enrolled in the study. Mean age of the recruited patients was 62.5 years (range: 20-95 years). Exclusion criteria included an age younger than 18 years and inadequate preparation for colonoscopy. None of the patients included in the study received antibiotic treatment of any kind in the month preceding the colonoscopy procedure.
The colonoscopy procedure examined the entire length of the colon or until an occluding tumor was detected. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Poria-Baruch Padeh Medical Center Institutional Review Board. All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
Bacterial culture
Samples were obtained proximal to the colonoscopic part of the suction tube that was used in the colonoscopy procedure. The end of the tubule, 3 cm in length, was placed in a sterile container and transferred to Laboratory of Clinical Microbiology following the colonoscopy procedure. Each tubule was transferred sterilely into a test tube with 2 mL of Brain-Heart Infusion Broth (Hylabs, Rehovot, Israel); an antibiotic disk impregnated with ertapenem (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD, United States) was added in order to delay growth of Gram-negative rods. Samples were incubated for 18 h at 37 °C. At the end of the incubation period, 5 μL of the test tube contents were seeded on Bile esculin agar (Hylabs), in accordance with the relevant protocol. Culture samples were incubated for a period of 18 h at 37 °C under CO2 atmosphere.
Identification of microorganisms
At the end of the incubation period, plates were examined for presence of S. bovis suspicious colonies. Presence of black-colored colonies on the plates indicated suspicion of S. bovis (black color attests to esculin hydrolysis). These colonies were sampled for Gram-staining and determination of catalase and pyrrolidonyl arylamidase presence. Colonies that were found to be Gram-positive cocci and were catalase and pyrrolidonyl arylamidase negative were further identified using a VITEK2 system (bioMérieux, Durham, NC, United States).
Statistical analysis
For statistical analysis, differences between continuous variables, summarized as mean ± SD, were analyzed with a Student’s t test. Differences between frequencies were analyzed using a χ2 test. A P < 0.05 was set to indicate statistical significance.
RESULTS
Two hundred three consecutive patients with adequate preparation for the colonoscopy procedure were recruited and underwent whole colonoscopy procedures in the Gastroenterology Department (except in cases of occluding tumor). Forty-nine patients (24%) were found to be S. bovis carriers.
Among the study population, 17 malignant tumors were diagnosed. In all these cases S. bovis was identified in suction fluid. Among 49 patients who were found positive for S. bovis, the endoscopic findings included: 17 (34.7%) cases with malignant tumors, 11 (22.5%) with large polyps, 5 (10.2%) with medium-sized polyps, 6 (12.2%) with small polyps, 4 (8.2%) with colitis, and 6 (12.2%) with normal colonoscopies.
Among 154 patients who were found negative for S. bovis, the endoscopic findings included: none with malignant tumors, 8 (5.2%) cases with large polyps, 11 (7.1%) with medium-sized polyps, 26 (16.9%) with small polyps, 7 (4.6%) with colitis, and 102 (66.2%) normal colonoscopies (Table 1). In all cases, histopathologic examination was performed with confirmation of malignant or benign nature of every lesion.
Table 1.
Variable | Negative (n = 154) | Positive (n = 49) | P value |
Age, yr | 60.1 | 70.1 | < 0.0001 |
Sex, female:male | 1:1 (77:77) | 1:1 (25:24) | 0.9010 |
Normal colonoscopy | 102 (66.2) | 6 (12.2) | < 0.0001 |
Colitis/ileitis | 7 (4.5) | 4 (8.1) | 0.4428 |
Small polyp | 26 (16.9) | 6 (12.2) | 0.4990 |
Medium-sized polyp | 11 (7.1) | 5 (10.2) | 0.4885 |
Large polyp | 8 (5.2) | 11 (22.4) | 0.0003 |
Malignant tumor | 0 | 17 (34.7) | < 0.0001 |
A significant difference was observed between S. bovis carriers (patients positive for S. bovis) and patients without S. bovis (negative) among those who were diagnosed by colonoscopy with malignant tumors, large polyps, or normal-nature colonoscopy. There was no difference between S. bovis-positive and -negative patients among those who were diagnosed with small- and medium-sized polyps and with colitis/ileitis.
The mean age of S. bovis carriers was significantly higher (10 years older) than the non-carriers group (P < 0.05), which could thereby predict potential appearance of advanced lesions in later stages of life.
DISCUSSION
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers (fourth among men and third among women)[14-17]. There is an association between S. bovis bacteremia and colonic neoplasia. It is not well understood whether the bacterium has a pathogenic role in the development of neoplasia or constitutes an epiphenomenon of colorectal neoplasms. Possible mechanisms that may explain this association include S. bovis overgrowth, breakdown of mucosal integrity, and subsequent bacterial translocation[18-21].
Performance of a routine colonoscopy examination in high-risk populations could result in detection, early treatment of premalignant lesions, and subsequent prevention of colorectal cancer. Early detection of a malignant lesion can be crucial in the success of treatment.
It is important to state that none of the available noninvasive tests are efficient enough tools for screening patients in high-risk populations, or to eventually predict the patients that must undergo colonoscopy examination. In this prospective study, we found a clear association between the presence of S. bovis in colonic suction fluid and findings of malignant tumor and large polyps in the colon. These findings confirm the previous data that correlates the presence of S. bovis with colorectal cancer[22-24]. Findings shown in these studies demonstrate an association of stool positivity with colorectal cancer, indicating that bowel suction fluid is representative of stool positivity for S. bovis. Stool samples in different forms can be used as screening material for detection of the population at risk for advanced colorectal lesion. This can become a preferred surveillance tool instead of repeated colonoscopy performance in patients who have undergone treatment of advanced colonic lesions by endoscopy or surgery[25,26].
Moreover, patients who had S. bovis-positive colonic content and whose colonoscopy examination showed a normal nature should be alerted and carefully observed in the future because of the possible pathogenic role of S. bovis in colorectal cancer. For this reason, culture of the suction fluid could shed light and predict the length of time required until the next colonoscopy. At present, there is no good noninvasive screening method for advanced colonic lesion detection.
In conclusion, we have found an association of S. bovis presence in colonic content and formation of malignant colonic tumors or large polyps, which could be detected in colonoscopy. We suggest considering our finding of this association in order to develop a reliable screening method for detection of advanced colonic lesions. In light of significant developments in molecular biology and greater sensitivity of these methods, it is a good idea to utilize this platform for identification of S. bovis[27-30].
COMMENTS
Background
Streptococcus bovis (S. bovis) is part of the normal flora of the human alimentary tract. S. bovis bacteremia is often associated with colonic gastrointestinal neoplasia, because of the pathogen’s proinflammatory potential and procarcinogenic characteristic. Patients with S. bovis bacteremia are advised to undergo colonoscopic investigation to rule out gastrointestinal tract neoplasia. Currently, there is no available noninvasive, efficient, predictive tool for screening patients in high-risk populations for the purpose of colonoscopy examination. The results of this study indicate that there is an association of S. bovis presence in colonic content and the formation of malignant colonic tumors or large polyps; this knowledge may suggest development of a reliable screening method for detection of advanced colonic lesions.
Research frontiers
In this study, the authors demonstrate the association between positive presence of S. bovis bacteria in the colon with precancerous changes and malignancies of colon. In recent years, there has been growing interest in research of the human microbiome; this is an example of a human disease that is associated with bacteria that are natural inhabitants of the human body.
Innovations and breakthroughs
Most studies examine the association between the presence of bacteria in a clinical culture, such as a blood culture, and malignancies of the digestive tract. In this study the authors examined the association between bacterial carriage in the intestine without knowledge about active infection and malignancies in the colon. In addition, in this study, differential enrichment of growth media were performed in order to increase S. bovis detection and identification.
Applications
The findings of the association of S. bovis presence in colonic content and formation of malignant colonic tumors or large polyps could be widely applied for the development of diagnostic and screening methods for detection of advanced colonic lesions. For example, S. bovis presence in colonic content may be applied in molecular biology methods for rapid identification of colonic malignancy.
Terminology
The VITEK 2 is an automated microbiology system utilizing growth-based technology for identification and susceptibility testing of the most clinically important bacteria.
Peer-review
The authors established an association between S. bovis bacteremia and malignant colonic lesions, it’s interesting and applicable.
Footnotes
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Peer-review started: October 19, 2014
First decision: December 11, 2014
Article in press: February 5, 2015
P- Reviewer: Al-Jashamy K S- Editor: Yu J L- Editor: AmEditor E- Editor: Liu XM
References
- 1.Abdulamir AS, Hafidh RR, Abu Bakar F. The association of Streptococcus bovis/gallolyticus with colorectal tumors: the nature and the underlying mechanisms of its etiological role. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2011;30:11. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-30-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Klein RS, Recco RA, Catalano MT, Edberg SC, Casey JI, Steigbigel NH. Association of Streptococcus bovis with carcinoma of the colon. N Engl J Med. 1977;297:800–802. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197710132971503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tjalsma H, Boleij A, Kato I. Streptococcus bovis and colorectal cancer. In: Tjalsma H, Boleij A, Kato I, editors. Bacteria and Cancer. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London. New York: Springer; 2012. pp. 61–78. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Peretz A, Dinisman-Zavulunov E, Koifman A, Brodsky D, Isakovich N, Glyatman T, Pastukh N, Paritsky M. Susceptibility of 45 Streptococcus bovis isolates to five antibiotic agents. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014;43:298–299. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Romero B, Morosini MI, Loza E, Rodríguez-Baños M, Navas E, Cantón R, Campo RD. Reidentification of Streptococcus bovis isolates causing bacteremia according to the new taxonomy criteria: still an issue? J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:3228–3233. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00524-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stein RA. Streptococcus infantarius and carcinogenesis: a new chapter in colorectal pathology. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67:1220–1224. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fregoli L, Palmeri M, Palombo C, Pelosini M, Taddei C, Miccoli P, Chiarugi M. Streptococcus bovis endocarditis as first clinical expression of an occult colorectal neoplasm. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:145–146. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1968-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Collins D, Hogan AM, Winter DC. Microbial and viral pathogens in colorectal cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:504–512. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70186-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Corredoira-Sánchez J, García-Garrote F, Rabuñal R, López-Roses L, García-País MJ, Castro E, González-Soler R, Coira A, Pita J, López-Álvarez MJ, et al. Association between bacteremia due to Streptococcus gallolyticus subsp. gallolyticus (Streptococcus bovis I) and colorectal neoplasia: a case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:491–496. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Burns CA, McCaughey R, Lauter CB. The association of Streptococcus bovis fecal carriage and colon neoplasia: possible relationship with polyps and their premalignant potential. Am J Gastroenterol. 1985;80:42–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shanan S, Gumaa SA, Sandström G, Abd H. Significant Association of Streptococcus bovis with Malignant Gastrointestinal Diseases. Int J Microbiol. 2011;2011:792019. doi: 10.1155/2011/792019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dubrow R, Edberg S, Wikfors E, Callan D, Troncale F, Vender R, Brand M, Yapp R. Fecal carriage of Streptococcus bovis and colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterology. 1991;101:721–725. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(91)90531-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Norfleet RG, Mitchell PD. Streptococcus bovis does not selectively colonize colorectal cancer and polyps. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1993;17:25–28. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199307000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.2.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schütze S, Berkovic D, Tomsing O, Unger C, Krönke M. Tumor necrosis factor induces rapid production of 1’2’diacylglycerol by a phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase C. J Exp Med. 1991;174:975–988. doi: 10.1084/jem.174.5.975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Stegeman I, de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, van Leerdam ME, Dekker E, van Ballegooijen M, Kuipers EJ, Fockens P, Kraaijenhagen RA, Bossuyt PM. Colorectal cancer risk factors in the detection of advanced adenoma and colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;37:278–283. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2013.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kostic AD, Chun E, Meyerson M, Garrett WS. Microbes and inflammation in colorectal cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013;1:150–157. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yang L, Pei Z. Bacteria, inflammation, and colon cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:6741–6746. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i42.6741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mager DL. Bacteria and cancer: cause, coincidence or cure? A review. J Transl Med. 2006;4:14. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-4-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.zur Hausen H. Streptococcus bovis: causal or incidental involvement in cancer of the colon? Int J Cancer. 2006;119:xi–xii. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Burnett-Hartman AN, Newcomb PA, Potter JD. Infectious agents and colorectal cancer: a review of Helicobacter pylori, Streptococcus bovis, JC virus, and human papillomavirus. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:2970–2979. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Potter MA, Cunliffe NA, Smith M, Miles RS, Flapan AD, Dunlop MG. A prospective controlled study of the association of Streptococcus bovis with colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51:473–474. doi: 10.1136/jcp.51.6.473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Al-Jashamy K, Murad A, Zeehaida M, Rohaini M, Hasnan J. Prevalence of colorectal cancer associated with Streptococcus bovis among inflammatory bowel and chronic gastrointestinal tract disease patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11:1765–1768. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Klein RS, Catalano MT, Edberg SC, Casey JI, Steigbigel NH. Streptococcus bovis septicemia and carcinoma of the colon. Ann Intern Med. 1979;91:560–562. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-91-4-560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Regula J, Rupinski M, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Pachlewski J, Orlowska J, Nowacki MP, Butruk E. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1863–1872. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Baxter NN, Warren JL, Barrett MJ, Stukel TA, Doria-Rose VP. Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:2664–2669. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.4772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Josefson P, Strålin K, Ohlin A, Ennefors T, Dragsten B, Andersson L, Fredlund H, Mölling P, Olcén P. Evaluation of a commercial multiplex PCR test (SeptiFast) in the etiological diagnosis of community-onset bloodstream infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30:1127–1134. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1201-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Marchesi JR, Dutilh BE, Hall N, Peters WH, Roelofs R, Boleij A, Tjalsma H. Towards the human colorectal cancer microbiome. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhou L, Li X, Ahmed A, Wu D, Liu L, Qiu J, Yan Y, Jin M, Xin Y. Gut microbe analysis between hyperthyroid and healthy individuals. Curr Microbiol. 2014;69:675–680. doi: 10.1007/s00284-014-0640-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jans C, Lacroix C, Meile L. A novel multiplex PCR/RFLP assay for the identification of Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex members from dairy microbial communities based on the 16S rRNA gene. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012;326:144–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02443.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]