Skip to main content
BMJ Clinical Evidence logoLink to BMJ Clinical Evidence
. 2015 May 13;2015:2302.

Insomnia (primary) in older people: non-drug treatments

Cathy Alessi 1,#, Michael V Vitiello 2,#
PMCID: PMC4429264  PMID: 25968443

Abstract

Introduction

Up to 40% of older adults have insomnia, with difficulty getting to sleep, early waking, or feeling unrefreshed on waking. The prevalence of insomnia increases with age. Other risk factors include psychological factors, stress, daytime napping, and hyperarousal.

Methods and outcomes

We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of non-drug treatments for primary insomnia in older people (aged 60 years and older)? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2014 (BMJ Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

Results

We found 14 studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

Conclusions

In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), exercise programmes, and timed exposure to bright light.

Key Points

Up to 40% of older adults have insomnia, with difficulty getting to sleep, early waking, or feeling unrefreshed on waking.

  • The prevalence of insomnia increases with age. Other risk factors include medical and psychiatric illnesses, psychological factors, stress, daytime napping, and hyperarousal.

  • Primary insomnia is a chronic and relapsing condition that may increase the risks of accidents. It is chronic insomnia without specific underlying medical, psychiatric, or other sleep disorders.

  • This review only covers primary insomnia in older people (aged 60 years and older). It examines evidence solely from RCTs and systematic reviews of RCTs.

Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) improves sleep compared with no treatment.

Exercise may improve symptoms compared with no treatment, but evidence is weak.

We don't know whether timed exposure to bright light improves sleep quality compared with no treatment, as we found insufficient evidence.

Clinical context

General background

Insomnia affects up to 40% of older adults. The prevalence increases with age. Primary insomnia is chronic insomnia without specific underlying medical, psychiatric, or other sleep disorders.

Focus of the review

Due to the high prevalence of insomnia in older adults, and the potentially increased risk of sleeping medications in this population, we chose to focus this review on the evidence for non-drug interventions for primary insomnia. In addition, essentially all published guidelines focusing on older adults include that non-drug interventions are recommended as first-line treatment for insomnia.

Comments on evidence

The evidence for effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is convincing, whereas the evidence for exercise programmes and timed exposure to bright light is less clear.

Search and appraisal summary

The update literature search for this review was carried out from the date of the last search, December 2010, to May 2014. For more information on the electronic databases searched and criteria applied during assessment of studies for potential relevance to the review, please see the Methods section. After deduplication and removal of conference abstracts, 112 records were screened for inclusion in the review. Appraisal of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 92 studies and the further review of 30 full publications. Of the 30 full articles evaluated, four RCTs were added at this update.

Additional information

Although this review focuses on primary insomnia, it is important to mention that, in older adults, insomnia commonly occurs in the presence of other comorbid conditions and that CBT-I is also efficacious in treating such insomnia.

About this condition

Definition

Insomnia is defined in the latest update of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, third edition (ICSD-3) as repeated difficulty initiating sleep, maintaining sleep, or waking up earlier than desired, which is associated with daytime symptoms and which is not explained purely by inadequate opportunity or circumstances for sleep. Additional types of sleep disturbance and daytime symptoms are included that occur primarily in children. This update of the ICSD also indicates that the sleep disturbance and associated daytime symptoms must occur at least three times per week. The latest update of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, fifth edition (DSM-5), defines insomnia disorder as dissatisfaction with sleep quantity or quality associated with difficulty initiating sleep, maintaining sleep, or early-morning awakening, which causes clinically significant distress or impaired functioning, despite adequate opportunity for sleep, and occurs at least 3 nights per week, with some additional criteria. Both ICSD-3 and DSM-5 require a duration of (chronic) insomnia for at least 3 months. Since the ICSD-3 was published in 2014 and the DSM-5 was published in 2013, the studies included in this review generally used earlier versions of these or other definitions for insomnia. Primary insomnia has been defined as chronic insomnia without specific underlying medical, psychiatric, or other sleep disorders, such as sleep apnoea, depression, dementia, periodic limb movement disorder, or circadian rhythm sleep disorder. This review only covers primary insomnia in older people. For this review we define older people as aged 60 years and older (we included studies where at least 80% of participants were recorded as aged 60 years or older).

Incidence/ Prevalence

One population survey in Sweden found that, across all adult age groups, up to 40% of people have insomnia. A US survey in people aged 18 to 79 years found that insomnia affected 35% of all adults during the course of 1 year, and that prevalence increased with age, with estimates ranging from 31% to 38% in people aged 18 to 64 years, to 45% in people aged 65 to 79 years. One US prospective cohort study in people aged over 65 years found that between 23% and 34% had insomnia, and between 7% and 15% had chronic insomnia. It also reported a higher incidence of insomnia in women than in men.

Aetiology/ Risk factors

The cause of insomnia is uncertain. The risk of primary insomnia increases with age and may be related to changes in circadian rhythms associated with age or the onset of chronic conditions and poorer health as a result of ageing. Psychological factors and lifestyle changes may exacerbate perceived effects of changes in sleep patterns associated with age, leading to reduced satisfaction with sleep. Other possible risk factors in all age groups include hyperarousal, chronic stress, and daytime napping.

Prognosis

We found few reliable data on long-term morbidity and mortality in people with primary insomnia. Primary insomnia is a chronic and relapsing condition. Likely consequences include reduced quality of life and increased risk of accidents owing to daytime sleepiness. People with primary insomnia may be at greater risk of dependence on hypnotic medication, depression, dementia, and falls, and may be more likely to require residential care.

Aims of intervention

To improve satisfaction with sleep; to prevent daytime sleepiness and improve functional and cognitive ability during the daytime.

Outcomes

Symptom improvement sleep latency; fragmentation of sleep/number of awakenings; early waking; quality of life; self-report of sleep satisfaction; sleep quality, measured by scales such as the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI); performance on attentional task tests; daytime functioning measured by scales such as the Stanford Sleepiness Scale and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale; wake after sleep onset (WASO); sleep efficiency. Adverse effects daytime sleepiness during acute phase of treatment.

Methods

BMJ Clinical Evidence search and appraisal May 2014. The following databases were used to identify studies for this systematic review: Medline 1966 to May 2014, Embase 1980 to May 2014, and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, issue 5 (1966 to date of issue). Additional searches were carried out in the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database. We also searched for retractions of studies included in the review. Titles and abstracts identified by the initial search, run by an information specialist, were first assessed against predefined criteria by an evidence scanner. Full texts for potentially relevant studies were then assessed against predefined criteria by an evidence analyst. Studies selected for inclusion were discussed with an expert contributor. All data relevant to the review were then extracted by an evidence analyst. Study design criteria for inclusion in this review were published RCTs and systematic reviews of RCTs in the English language, any level of blinding, and containing 20 or more individuals (10 in each arm), of whom more than 80% were followed up. There was no minimum length of follow-up. We included RCTs and systematic reviews of RCTs where harms of an included intervention were assessed, applying the same study design criteria for inclusion as we did for benefits. In addition, we use a regular surveillance protocol to capture harms alerts from organisations such as the FDA and the MHRA, which are added to the reviews as required. To aid readability of the numerical data in our reviews, we round many percentages to the nearest whole number. Readers should be aware of this when relating percentages to summary statistics such as relative risks (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs). We have performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions included in this review (see table). The categorisation of the quality of the evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) reflects the quality of evidence available for our chosen outcomes in our defined populations of interest. These categorisations are not necessarily a reflection of the overall methodological quality of any individual study, because the Clinical Evidence population and outcome of choice may represent only a small subset of the total outcomes reported, and population included, in any individual trial. For further details of how we perform the GRADE evaluation and the scoring system we use, please see our website (www.clinicalevidence.com).

Table.

GRADE Evaluation of interventions for Insomnia (primary) in older people: non-drug treatments.

Important outcomes Symptom improvement
Studies (Participants) Outcome Comparison Type of evidence Quality Consistency Directness Effect size GRADE Comment
What are the effects of non-drug treatments for primary insomnia in older people (aged 60 years and older)?
at least 12 (at least 461) Symptom improvement CBT-I versus no treatment 4 0 0 –1 0 Moderate Directness point deducted for mixed population (unclear in 1 study; comorbid insomnia in at least 2 others) and range of variants of CBT-I assessed (unclear if all variants equally effective)
2 (95) Symptom improvement Exercise versus no treatment 4 –2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and for subgroup analysis
1 (61) Symptom improvement Timed exposure to bright light versus no treatment 4 –3 0 0 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, poor follow-up, and incomplete reporting of results

We initially allocate 4 points to evidence from RCTs, and 2 points to evidence from observational studies. To attain the final GRADE score for a given comparison, points are deducted or added from this initial score based on preset criteria relating to the categories of quality, directness, consistency, and effect size. Quality: based on issues affecting methodological rigour (e.g., incomplete reporting of results, quasi-randomisation, sparse data [<200 people in the analysis]). Consistency: based on similarity of results across studies. Directness: based on generalisability of population or outcomes. Effect size: based on magnitude of effect as measured by statistics such as relative risk, odds ratio, or hazard ratio.

Glossary

Actigraphy

The measurement of body movement used to estimate rest/activity and sleep/wake rhythms over extended periods of time.

Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I)

The following cognitive behavioural therapies for insomnia were considered in this review: stimulus control, sleep hygiene education, muscle relaxation, sleep restriction, cognitive therapies, and behavioural therapy and brief behavioural therapy/treatment. Stimulus control consists of measures to control the stimuli that affect sleep, such as establishing a standard wake up time, getting out of bed during long periods of wakefulness, and eliminating non-nocturnal sleep. Sleep hygiene education informs people about lifestyle modifications that may impair or enhance sleep, such as avoiding alcohol, heavy meals, and exercise before going to bed, and aims to alter expectations about normal sleep durations. Muscle relaxation involves sequential muscle tensing and relaxing. Sleep restriction reduces the time spent in bed to increase the proportion of time spent asleep while in bed. Cognitive therapy for insomnia aims to identify and alter beliefs and expectations about sleep and sleep onset (e.g., beliefs about 'necessary' sleep duration). Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia may be undertaken on a one-to-one basis (individual therapy) or with a group of people (group therapy).

Low-quality evidence

Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

Moderate-quality evidence

Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

A validated 21-point scale (0 = best, 21 = worst) to measure subjective sleep quality. A score above 5 indicates insomnia.

Polysomnography

The electrographic monitoring of sleep using, for example, electroencephalogram (EEG), electromyography (EMG), and respiratory measurements.

Sleep onset latency

The interval of time between "settling down" to go to sleep and the actual onset of sleep.

Very low-quality evidence

Any estimate of effect is very uncertain.

Wake after sleep onset (WASO)

The amount of time spent awake after sleep has been initiated and before final awakening .

Disclaimer

The information contained in this publication is intended for medical professionals. Categories presented in Clinical Evidence indicate a judgement about the strength of the evidence available to our contributors prior to publication and the relevant importance of benefit and harms. We rely on our contributors to confirm the accuracy of the information presented and to adhere to describe accepted practices. Readers should be aware that professionals in the field may have different opinions. Because of this and regular advances in medical research we strongly recommend that readers' independently verify specified treatments and drugs including manufacturers' guidance. Also, the categories do not indicate whether a particular treatment is generally appropriate or whether it is suitable for a particular individual. Ultimately it is the readers' responsibility to make their own professional judgements, so to appropriately advise and treat their patients. To the fullest extent permitted by law, BMJ Publishing Group Limited and its editors are not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, products liability or otherwise) whether they be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the application of the information in this publication.

Contributor Information

Cathy Alessi, Veterans Administration Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, US.

Michael V. Vitiello, University of Washington, Seattle, US.

References

  • 1.American Academy of Sleep Medicine. International classification of sleep disorders, 3rd ed. Darien, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2014:21–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th ed. (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013:362–363. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Liljenberg B, Almqvist M, Hetta J, et al. Age and the prevalence of insomnia in adulthood. Eur J Psychiatry 1989;3:5–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mellinger GD, Balter MB, Uhlenhuth EH. Insomnia and its treatment. Prevalence and correlates. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985;42:225–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Foley DJ, Monjan AA, Brown SL, et al. Sleep complaints among elderly persons: an epidemiologic study of three communities. Sleep 2005;18:425–432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tjepkema M. Insomnia. Health Rep 2005;17:9–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bliwise DL. Sleep in normal aging and dementia. Sleep 1993;16:40–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Working Group on Insomnia. Insomnia: assessment and management in primary care. Am Fam Physician 1999;59:3029–3038. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.National Center on Sleep Disorders Research Working Group. Recognizing problem sleepiness in your patients. Am Fam Physician 1999;59:937–944. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Reynolds CF, Buysse DJ, Kupfer DJ. Treating insomnia in older adults: taking a long term view. JAMA 1999;281:1034–1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cricco M, Simonsick EM, Foley DJ. The impact of insomnia on cognitive functioning in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:1185–1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McCurry SM, Logsdon RG, Teri L, et al. Evidence-based psychological treatments for insomnia in older adults. Psychol Aging 2007;22:18–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Montgomery P, Dennis J. Cognitive behavioural interventions for sleep problems in adults aged 60+. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 5, 2014. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Montgomery P, Dennis J. A systematic review of non-pharmacological therapies for sleep problems in later life. Sleep Med Rev 2004;8:47–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Morin CM, Bootzin RR, Buysse DJ, et al. Psychological and behavioral treatment of insomnia: update of the recent evidence (1998–2004). Sleep 2006;29:1398–1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Irwin MR, Cole JC, Nicassio PM. Comparative meta-analysis of behavioral interventions for insomnia and their efficacy in middle-aged adults and in older adults 55+ years of age. Health Psychol 2006;25:3–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Soeffing JP, Lichstein KL, Nau SD, et al. Psychological treatment of insomnia in hypnotic-dependant older adults. Sleep Med 2008;9:165–171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Germain A, Moul DE, Franzen PL, et al. Effects of a brief behavioral treatment for late-life insomnia: preliminary findings. J Clin Sleep Med 2006;2:403−406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lichstein KL, Nau SD, Wilson NM, et al. Psychological treatment of hypnotic-dependent insomnia in a primarily older adult sample. Behav Res Ther 2013;51:787−796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Buysse DJ, Germain A, Moul DE, et al. Efficacy of brief behavioral treatment for chronic insomnia in older adults. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:887−895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lovato N, Lack L, Wright H, et al. Evaluation of a brief treatment program of cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia in older adults. Sleep 2014;37:117−126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Epstein DR, Sidani S, Bootzin RR, et al. Dismantling multicomponent behavioral treatment for insomnia in older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Sleep 2012;35:797−805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Montgomery P, Dennis J. Physical exercise for sleep problems in adults aged 60+. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 5, 2014. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Irwin MR, Olmstead R, Motivala SJ, et al. Improving sleep quality in older adults with moderate sleep complaints: a randomized controlled trial of Tai Chi Chih. Sleep 2008;31:1001−1008. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Montgomery P, Dennis J. Bright light therapy for sleep problems in adults aged 60+. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 5, 2014. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Friedman L, Zeitzer JM, Kushida C, et al. Scheduled bright light for treatment of insomnia in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009;57:441–452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Skjerve A, Bjorvatn B, Holsten F. Light therapy for behavioural and psychological symptoms. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004;19:516−522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 May 13;2015:2302.

Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia

Summary

The specific components of Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomia (CBT-I) varied across studies, but generally included stimulus control, sleep restriction, and cognitive therapy, with or without other components. However, some studies involved individual components of behavioural therapy, or other combinations of behavioural therapies for insomnia.

CBT-I improves sleep in older people with primary insomnia compared with no treatment.

Benefits and harms

CBT-I versus no treatment:

We found five systematic reviews (search dates 2001 [although the review included some studies up to 2005]; 2002; and 2004 ). The reviews identified 11 RCTs in total. There was much crossover of reporting across the various reviews, with nine of the 11 RCTs reported in at least two of the reviews. All the reviews reported that the included studies demonstrated some improvements in symptoms with CBT-I compared with no treatment, although two reviews cautioned that the treatment effect was modest. Only two reviews performed meta-analyses, and we report only the results of the most recent review here. We also found six subsequent RCTs.

Symptom improvement

CBT-I compared with no treatment CBT-I is more effective than no treatment at improving sleep outcomes in older people with primary insomnia (moderate-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Sleep latency

Systematic review
People aged at least 55 years
7 RCTs in this analysis
Mean time to fall asleep
with CBT-I
with no treatment
Absolute numbers not reported

Mean effect size –0.51
95% CI –0.77 to –0.25
P <0.001
Effect size not calculated CBT-I

RCT
47 hypnotic-dependent people with chronic insomnia aged 50–85 years, mean age 64 years (see Further information on studies for more details of study population)
Subgroup analysis
Change from baseline in sleep onset latency (minutes) 8 weeks
From 44.61 to 19.85 with CBT-I
From 41.42 to 30.50 with control (sham biofeedback)

P <0.05
Effect size not calculated CBT-I

RCT
35 people aged >60 years with DSM-IV criteria for primary insomnia Change in self-reported mean time to fall asleep (minutes) 4 weeks
From 38.32 to 16.80 with brief behavioural treatment for insomnia (BBT-I)
From 29.67 to 26.85 with information-only control

P <0.05
Effect size not calculated BBT-I

RCT
3-armed trial
70 hypnotic-dependent people with insomnia aged >50 years, mean age ranging from 63.5–64.2 years Mean sleep onset latency (minutes) 1 year
24.1 with CBT-I
27.3 with placebo biofeedback

Significance not reported

RCT
82 older people with chronic insomnia, mean age 71.7 years Mean sleep onset latency (minutes) 4 weeks
19.7 with BBT-I
30.1 with control (information)

Mean difference –21.83
95% CI –32.11 to –11.55
P value not reported
Effect size not calculated BBT-I

RCT
118 people with sleep maintenance insomnia, mean age 63.8 years Mean sleep onset latency (minutes) 3 months
24 with CBT-I
22 with wait list control

Significance not reported

RCT
4-armed trial
179 older people with chronic primary insomnia, mean age 68.9 years Mean sleep onset latency (minutes) 8 weeks
17.0 with stimulus control therapy (SCT)
23.6 with sleep restriction therapy (SRT)
20.5 with multi-component behavioural intervention (MCI)
43.2 with control (wait list)

P <0.01, CBT-I (all 3 groups) v control
Effect size not calculated CBT-I
Sleep efficiency

Systematic review
People aged at least 55 years
6 RCTs in this analysis
Ratio of time asleep to time in bed
with CBT-I
with no treatment
Absolute numbers not reported

Mean effect size 0.38
95% CI 0.12 to 0.65
P <0.005
Effect size not calculated CBT-I

RCT
47 hypnotic-dependent people with chronic insomnia aged 50 to 85 years, mean age 64 years (see Further information on studies for more details of study population)
Subgroup analysis
Change from baseline in sleep efficiency (%) 8 weeks
From 72.87 to 86.80 with CBT-I
From 72.36 to 79.32 with control (sham biofeedback)

P <0.05
Effect size not calculated CBT-I

RCT
3-armed trial
70 hypnotic-dependent people with insomnia, mean age ranging from 63.5 to 64.2 years Mean sleep efficiency (%) 1 year
85.4 with CBT-I
81.1 with placebo biofeedback

Significance not reported

RCT
82 older people with chronic insomnia, mean age 71.7 years Mean sleep efficiency (%) 4 weeks
87.3 with BBT-I
82.3 with control (information)

Mean difference 7.54
95% CI 3.25 to 11.83
P value not reported
Effect size not calculated BBT-I

RCT
118 people with sleep maintenance insomnia, mean age 63.8 years Mean sleep efficiency (%) 3 months
77.9 with CBT-I
70.2 with wait list control

P less than or equal to 0.026
Effect size not calculated CBT-I

RCT
4-armed trial
179 older people with chronic primary insomnia, mean age 68.9 years Mean sleep efficiency (%) 8 weeks
81.5 with SCT
81.0 with SRT
84.1 with MCI
68.3 with control (wait list)

P <0.01, CBT-I (all 3 groups) v control
Effect size not calculated CBT-I
Wake after sleep onset (WASO)

Systematic review
People aged at least 55 years
7 RCTs in this analysis
Wake after sleep onset (WASO)
with CBT-I
with no treatment
Absolute numbers not reported

Mean effect size –0.73
95% CI –0.99 to –0.48
P <0.001
Effect size not calculated CBT-I

RCT
47 hypnotic-dependent people with chronic insomnia aged 50–85 years, mean age 64 years
Subgroup analysis
Change from baseline in WASO (minutes) 8 weeks
From 71.55 to 26.92 with CBT-I
From 58.07 to 37.56 with control (sham biofeedback)

P <0.05
Effect size not calculated CBT-I

RCT
35 people aged >60 years with DSM-IV criteria for primary insomnia Change in self-reported WASO (minutes) 4 weeks
From 61.21 to 27.72 with BBT-I
From 47.91 to 35.5 with information-only control

P <0.05
Effect size not calculated BBT-I

RCT
3-armed trial
70 hypnotic-dependent people with insomnia, mean age ranging from 63.5–64.2 years Mean WASO (minutes) 1 year
30.1 with CBT-I
32.7 with placebo biofeedback

Significance not reported

RCT
82 older people with chronic insomnia, mean age 71.7 years Mean WASO (minutes) 4 weeks
28.0 with BBT-I
47.7 with control (information)

Mean difference –20.63
95% CI –36.56 to –4.71
P value not reported
Effect size not calculated BBT-I

RCT
118 people with sleep maintenance insomnia, mean age 63.8 years Mean WASO (hours) 3 months
1.3 with cognitive behaviour therapy intervention (CBT-I)
2.0 with wait list control

P less than or equal to 0.026
Effect size not calculated CBT-I

RCT
4-armed trial
179 older people with chronic primary insomnia, mean age 68.9 years Mean WASO (minutes) 8 weeks
40.3 with SCT
36.3 with SRT
32.4 with MCI
66.9 with control (wait list)

P <0.01, CBT-I (all 3 groups) v control
Effect size not calculated CBT-I
Sleep quality

RCT
3-armed trial
70 hypnotic-dependent people with insomnia, mean age ranging from 63.5–64.2 years Mean subjective sleep-quality score, from 1 = very poor to 5 = excellent 1 year
3.50 with CBT-I
3.36 with placebo biofeedback

Significance not reported

RCT
82 older people with chronic insomnia, mean age 71.7 years Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) 4 weeks
6.9 with BBT-I
9.8 with control (information)

Mean difference –3.00
95% CI –4.24 to –1.76
P value not reported
Effect size not calculated BBT-I

RCT
4-armed trial
179 older people with chronic primary insomnia, mean age 68.9 years Mean self-reported sleep quality rating, from 1 = very restless to 5 = very sound 8 weeks
3.0 with SCT
2.9 with SRT
3.0 with MCI
2.6 with control (wait list)

P <0.01, CBT-I (all 3 groups) v control
Effect size not calculated CBT-I
Quality of life

RCT
82 older people with chronic insomnia, mean age 71.7 years SF-36, Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey 4 weeks
76.4 with BBT-I
65.2 with control (information)

Mean difference 6.18
95% CI 1.27 to 11.09
P value not reported
Effect size not calculated BBT-I
Number of awakenings

RCT
118 people with sleep maintenance insomnia, mean age 63.8 years Number of awakenings (scale not reported) 3 months
2.5 with CBT-I
2.6 with wait list control

Significance not reported
Daytime functioning

RCT
3-armed trial
70 hypnotic-dependent people with insomnia, mean age ranging from 63.5–64.2 years Epworth Sleepiness Scale 1 year
5.7 with CBT-I
7.0 with placebo biofeedback

Significance not reported

RCT
82 older people with chronic insomnia, mean age 71.7 years Epworth Sleepiness Scale 4 weeks
5.9 with BBT-I
6.5 with control (information)

Mean difference +0.47
95% CI –0.71 to +1.64
P value not reported
Not significant

RCT
118 people with sleep maintenance insomnia, mean age 63.8 years Epworth Sleepiness Scale 3 months
6.6 with CBT-I
8.2 with wait list

P = 0.011
Effect size not calculated CBT-I

Adverse effects

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Further information on studies

The meta-analyses included RCTs of participants whose mean age was at least 55 years. The review included only RCTs in which at least one intervention was CBT-I "or some recognised variant, including omnibus CBT-I, progression relaxation, sleep restriction, stimulus control, imagery training, paradoxical intention, and biofeedback".

The authors stated that the study population was a subset of participants recruited for a larger study of withdrawal from chronic hypnotic use. Prescription medication used specifically to improve sleep was allowed as long as use was sustained and frequent. Although the authors did not specifically use the term 'primary insomnia' to describe the population, the inclusion criteria of chronic insomnia without medical conditions or symptoms that may have affected sleep satisfy the definition of primary insomnia.

BBT-I was delivered in a single individual 45-minute session with a 30-minute booster session 2 weeks later. Post-intervention assessments were completed after 4 weeks. The initial session included information about mechanisms that regulate sleep, factors that influence sleep, and behaviours that promote or interfere with sleep quality. The information-only control was "designed to emulate the type of behavioural instructions most primary care patients might receive". People in the information-only control arm received brochures and a follow-up telephone call 2 weeks later.

The main aim of the study was hypnotic withdrawal. Method of randomisation used was not described. All participants received $300 compensation following treatment. CBT-I consisted of a combination of relaxation training, stimulus control, and sleep hygiene instructions. People in the placebo group were given placebo biofeedback. Both involved weekly individual sessions (approximately 45 minutes each) for 8 weeks, and once completed, medication withdrawal began. Medication withdrawal was done via a supervised programme of bi-weekly 15- to 30-minute appointments, to gradually reduce dose over an approximately 8-week period. The outcome variables collected were informed by sleep diaries and a sleep questionnaire. Outcome variables were also collected by polysomnography, but we have only extracted data collected by sleep diaries and questionnaires. The authors reported that while the CBT-I group had sleep gains, the only significant improvement (P <0.05) was the within-group mean change from baseline to post-treatment in sleep onset latency (self-reported), and that this was maintained at the 1-year follow-up. However, there was no significant difference in medication withdrawal between groups. The authors suggest this three-armed study is most probably underpowered and would be enhanced by a greater number of participants than initially included.

This RCT included 82 adults with chronic 'comorbid' insomnia randomly assigned to BBT-I or control (information). Exclusion criteria included dementia, or untreated psychiatric, substance use, or other sleep disorder. Individuals with treated depressive, anxiety, or sleep disorders were not excluded. Previously diagnosed and treated sleep apnoea was not an exclusion, but the final sample did not include anyone with this condition. BBT-I was delivered in a very similar manner to the intervention of . Slight differences included the length of the individual sessions, which could last up to 60 minutes, and after the follow-up sessions were 20-minute telephone calls at the end of weeks 1 and 3. An intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed, and the study reported general clinical and sleep measures by multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA). The outcome variables collected were informed by sleep diaries and a sleep questionnaire.

This RCT included 118 hypnotic-free older adults with chronic primary insomnia randomised (method unclear) to a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention (CBT-I) or waiting list control (WLC). CBT-I included bedtime restriction, cognitive therapy, and an education component. A set of 60-minute sessions were provided for 4 weeks to small groups of participants. Bed restriction was administered during the first week. The cognitive component focused on participants' cognitions related to sleep and, along with the education component of sleep and hygiene practices, was the focus of treatment weeks 2 and 3. The final week of treatment emphasised relapse prevention as well as summarising information from the prior weeks.

In this study, 179 older people with chronic primary insomnia were randomised into one of four groups: a waiting list control (WLC), stimulus control therapy (SCT), sleep restriction therapy (SRT), or a multi-component behavioural intervention (MCI), which consisted of both single components (SCT and SRT). Treated participants received the intervention immediately, while those in the waiting list control group received a delayed intervention. Follow-up occurred at 3 months and 1 year for the intervention groups, but there were only 8-week data available for the waiting list control group. The outcome data collected were informed by sleep diaries and a sleep quality question. The generalisability of this study may be limited since the participants were primarily white, well-educated, married women.

Comment

None.

Substantive changes

Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia Four RCTs added. Categorisation unchanged (beneficial).

BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 May 13;2015:2302.

Exercise programmes

Summary

Exercise may improve sleep symptoms in older people with primary insomnia compared with no treatment, but evidence is weak.

Benefits and harms

Exercise versus no treatment:

We found one systematic review of exercise therapy (search date 2002, 1 RCT; 43 people with primary insomnia, at least 80% of whom were aged 60 years or over), and one subsequent RCT of Tai Chi Chih in people with "moderate sleep complaints".

Symptom improvement

Moderate-intensity exercise compared with no treatment Moderate-intensity exercise (30–40 minutes of walking or low-impact aerobics 4 times per week, or Tai Chi Chih 3 times per week) may be more effective than no treatment at improving sleep quality at 16 to 25 weeks in people with primary insomnia, but evidence is weak (low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Sleep quality

Systematic review
43 people with primary insomnia, at least 80% aged 60 years and over
Data from 1 RCT
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) 16 weeks
5.4 with exercise therapy
8.8 with no treatment

Mean score improvement with exercise programme v no treatment: 3.4
95% CI 1.9 to 5.4
P <0.001
Effect size not calculated exercise therapy

RCT
52 people aged 59–86 years
Subgroup analysis
Proportion of people with PSQI of at least 5 at baseline who achieved PSQI <5 25 weeks
19/30 (63%) with Tai Chi Chih
7/22 (32%) with health education control

P <0.05
Effect size not calculated Tai Chi Chih

RCT
52 people aged 59–86 years
Subgroup analysis
Change from baseline in PSQI global sleep quality score 25 weeks
From 6.67 to 2.30 with Tai Chi Chih
From 8.18 to 6.97 with health education control

P <0.001
Effect size not calculated Tai Chi Chih

Adverse effects

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Further information on studies

Moderate-intensity exercise consisted of 30 to 40 minutes of walking or low-impact aerobics four times per week.

Active treatment consisted of a three times-weekly 16-week teaching phase. Follow-up was after a further 9 weeks. The health education control consisted of 16 didactic sessions, with two sessions specifically on sleep hygiene. The Tai Chi Chih group also reported improvements from baseline in sleep quality (P <0.05), sleep efficiency (P <0.05), sleep duration (P <0.01), and sleep disturbance (P <0.01), also measured by PSQI.

Comment

None.

Substantive changes

No new evidence

BMJ Clin Evid. 2015 May 13;2015:2302.

Timed exposure to bright light

Summary

We found insufficient evidence on the effects of timed exposure to bright light from one small RCT.

Benefits and harms

Timed exposure to bright light versus no treatment:

We found one systematic review (search date 2001) comparing the effects of timed bright light exposure with other treatments or no treatment in people aged 60 years and over, which identified no RCTs. We found one small subsequent RCT.

Symptom improvement

Timed exposure to bright light compared with no treatment We don't know whether timed exposure to bright light is more effective at improving sleep symptoms in people aged 60 years and over with primary insomnia compared with no treatment (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Total sleep time

RCT
4-armed trial
61 adults meeting primary insomnia criteria, mean age 63.6 years, range 54–78 years Change from baseline in total sleep time (minutes), measured by actigraphy 12 weeks
From 412.2 to 384.0 with evening bright light (4000 lux)
From 408.0 to 392.6 with morning bright light (4000 lux)
From 402.4 to 383.3 with placebo (evening dim light [65 lux])
From 369.8 to 365.2 with placebo (morning dim light [65 lux])

Between-group P values not reported
Reported as not significant
Not significant

RCT
4-armed trial
61 adults meeting primary insomnia criteria, mean age 63.6 years, range 54–78 years Change from baseline in total sleep time (minutes), measured by polysomnography 12 weeks
From 361.3 to 353.3 with evening bright light (4000 lux)
From 336.3 to 345.5 with morning bright light (4000 lux)
From 364.3 to 358.9 with placebo (evening dim light [65 lux])
From 320.7 to 320.0 with placebo (morning dim light [65 lux])

Between-group P values not reported
Reported as not significant
Not significant

RCT
4-armed trial
61 adults meeting primary insomnia criteria, mean age 63.6 years, range 54–78 years Change from baseline in total sleep time (minutes), subjective measure 12 weeks
From 340.9 to 380.3 with evening bright light (4000 lux)
From 339.2 to 367.5 with morning bright light (4000 lux)
From 345.8 to 378.9 with placebo (evening dim light [65 lux])
From 320.6 to 291.1 with placebo (morning dim light [65 lux])

Between-group P values not reported
Reported as not significant
Not significant
Wake after sleep onset (WASO)

RCT
4-armed trial
61 adults meeting primary insomnia criteria, mean age 63.6 years, range 54–78 years Change from baseline in WASO (in minutes), measured by actigraphy 12 weeks
From 57.2 to 52.1 with evening bright light (4000 lux)
From 66.2 to 55.7 with morning bright light (4000 lux)
From 54.7 to 65.6 with placebo (evening dim light [65 lux])
From 61.3 to 63.0 with placebo (morning dim light [65 lux])

Between-group P values not reported
Reported as not significant
Not significant

RCT
4-armed trial
61 adults meeting primary insomnia criteria, mean age 63.6 years, range 54–78 years Change from baseline in WASO (in minutes), measured by polysomnography 12 weeks
From 77.8 to 64.5 with evening bright light (4000 lux)
From 88.8 to 86.4 with morning bright light (4000 lux)
From 73.4 to 64.7 with placebo (evening dim light [65 lux])
From 82.9 to 68.2 with placebo (morning dim light [65 lux])

Between-group P values not reported
Reported as not significant
Not significant

RCT
4-armed trial
61 adults meeting primary insomnia criteria, mean age 63.6 years, range 54–78 years Change from baseline in WASO (in minutes), subjective measure 12 weeks
From 63.8 to 30.8 with evening bright light (4000 lux)
From 74.0 to 48.9 with morning bright light (4000 lux)
From 65.2 to 55.6 with placebo (evening dim light [65 lux])
From 69.5 to 63.3 with placebo (morning dim light [65 lux])

Between-group P values not reported
Reported as not significant
Not significant
Sleep efficiency

RCT
4-armed trial
61 adults meeting primary insomnia criteria, mean age 63.6 years, range 54–78 years Change from baseline in sleep efficiency (%), measured by actigraphy 12 weeks
From 80.1 to 79.8 with evening bright light (4000 lux)
From 80.6 to 82.4 with morning bright light (4000 lux)
From 82.3 to 77.8 with placebo (evening dim light [65 lux])
From 78.9 to 76.7 with placebo (morning dim light [65 lux])

Between-group P values not reported
Reported as not significant
Not significant

RCT
4-armed trial
61 adults meeting primary insomnia criteria, mean age 63.6 years, range 54–78 years Change from baseline in sleep efficiency (%), measured by polysomnography 12 weeks
From 76.8 to 78.2 with evening bright light (4000 lux)
From 72.5 to 74.3 with morning bright light (4000 lux)
From 75.9 to 76.5 with placebo (evening dim light [65 lux])
From 72.2 to 74.1 with placebo (morning dim light [65 lux])

Between-group P values not reported
Reported as not significant
Not significant

RCT
4-armed trial
61 adults meeting primary insomnia criteria, mean age 63.6 years, range 54–78 years Change from baseline in sleep efficiency (%), subjective measure 12 weeks
From 67.4 to 79.5 with evening bright light (4000 lux)
From 66.8 to 77.0 with morning bright light (4000 lux)
From 71.6 to 76.9 with placebo (evening dim light [65 lux])
From 69.4 to 73.1 with placebo (morning dim light [65 lux])

Between-group P values not reported
Reported as not significant
Not significant

Adverse effects

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Further information on studies

The RCT randomised on a 2:1 basis (with more people in the bright-light group). The two dim-light (placebo) groups contained fewer than 10 people in each group. All participants received sleep hygiene instructions. Light exposure was for 45 minutes daily for 12 weeks. The RCT reported that adherence to treatment at 12 weeks in the various groups was 83% (bright morning light), 77% (bright evening light), 69% (dim morning light), and 61% (dim evening light).

Comment

Bright light has been found to assist with circadian rhythm abnormalities in other populations.

Substantive changes

No new evidence


Articles from BMJ Clinical Evidence are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES