Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 13.
Published in final edited form as: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 May 3;19(8):1259–1262. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.04.023

Pharmacologic Immunoablation Followed by Reduced-Toxicity Conditioning and Stem Cell Transplantation in High-Risk Thalassemia: A Safe Approach to Disease Control

Usanarat Anurathapan 1, Samart Pakakasama 1, Piya Rujkijyanont 2, Nongnuch Sirachainan 1, Duantida Songdej 1, Ampaiwan Chuansumrit 1, Somtawin Sirireung 3, Pimlak Charoenkwan 4, Arunee Jetsrisuparb 5, Surapol Issaragrsil 6, Artit Ungkanont 7, Rosarin Sruamsiri 8, Supanart Srisala 9, Borje S Andersson 10, Suradej Hongeng 1,*
PMCID: PMC4429773  NIHMSID: NIHMS642956  PMID: 23648235

Abstract

Patients with class 3 thalassemia with high-risk features for adverse events after high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are difficult to treat, tending to either suffer serious toxicity or fail to establish stable graft function. We performed HSCT in 18 such patients age ≥7 years and hepatomegaly using a novel approach with pharmacologic immunoablation followed by a myeloablative reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen (fludarabine and i.v. busulfan [Flu-IV Bu]) and then HSCT. The median patient age was 14 years (range, 10 to 18 years). Before the Flu-IV Bu + antithymocyte globulin conditioning regimen, all patients received one to two cycles of immunosuppressive pharmacotherapy with fludarabine and dexamethasone. Thirteen patients received a related donor graft, and 5 received an unrelated donor graft. An initial prompt engraftment of donor cells with full donor chimerism was observed in all 18 patients, but 2 patients developed secondary mixed chimerism that necessitated withdrawal of immunosuppression to achieve full donor chimerism. Two patients (11%) had acute grade III–IV graft-versus-host disease, and 5 patients had limited chronic graft-versus-host disease. The only treatment-related mortality was from infection, and with a median follow-up of 42 months (range, 4 to 75), the 5-year overall survival and thalassemia-free survival were 89%. We conclude that this novel sequential immunoablative pre-transplantation conditioning program is safe and effective for patients with high-risk class 3 thalassemia exhibiting additional comorbidities.

Keywords: Transplantation, Class 3 high-risk thalassemia, Reduced-toxicity conditioning

INTRODUCTION

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the sole available curative therapy for patients with severe β-thalassemia, providing potential cure in approximately 80% of recipients [1]. However, several reports have suggested the existence of a subset of patients with worse outcomes. This subgroup includes older patients with normal organ damage due to iron overload and/or evidence of immunization to donor histocompatibility antigens through multiple blood transfusions. These patients, classified by Lucarelli et al. [1] as “class 3,” demonstrate high transplantation-related mortality (TRM; ~40%) and rejection rates (~16%).

The current risk classification of patients with severe thalassemia undergoing HSCT fails to recognize another high-risk subgroup, however: patients age ≥7 years with a liver ≥5 cm in size. These patients constitute what Mathews et al. [2] defined as a very-high-risk subset of a conventional high-risk class 3 group. The adverse impact of age and liver size was further validated by a Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation Research study that summarized HSCT results at centers outside Italy and confirmed a higher TRM in patients age >7 years and those with hepatomegaly [3]. The patients in these high-risk class 3 subsets are at elevated risk for graft rejection and regimen-related toxicity, especially veno-occlusive disease, leading to multiorgan failure and death. This finding stimulated the investigation of several novel conditioning regimens [47].

We previously reported the use of reduced-intensity conditioning in 8 patients with class 3 thalassemia, 6 of whom survived thalassemia-free but 2 of whom rejected their grafts [5]. In the present study, we wanted to test the hypothesis that sequential immunosuppressive pharmacotherapy (ISPT) with fludarabine (Flu) and dexamethasone (Dex) before reduced-toxicity conditioning for HSCT would safely suppress recipient T cell function and permit sustainable engraftment while modulating host cell-mediated antigen presentation to alter the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), ultimately resulting in improved disease control.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University. All patients provided written informed consent.

Eighteen patients with severe thalassemia (14 with β-thalassemia/hemoglobin E and 4 with homozygous β-thalassemia) treated between December 2007 and December 2012 were included in this study. Two (patients 3 and 4) who had undergone previous HSCT and experienced graft rejection were enrolled for a second HSCT. The cohort included 7 males and 11 females, with a median age of 14 years (range, 10 to 18 years). All 18 patients had hepatomegaly (liver >2 cm below the costal margin [3]), and 7 had undergone splenectomy. The median ferritin level was 3100 ng/mL (range, 869 to 8350 ng/mL). All patients were Lucarelli class 3 [1].

HLA typing was performed using a DNA-based high-resolution technique with sequence-specific oligonucleotide primers for class I and class II loci. Thirteen patients received a related donor graft and 5 received an unrelated donor graft. Two of 13 patients in the related-donor group and 2 of 5 patients in the unrelated-donor group had a 1-antigen-mismatched donor (Table 1).

Table 1.

Patient Characteristics and Outcomes

Patient Age,
Yrs/Mo
Sex Comorbidity before
Transplant
Ferritin Level,
ng/mL
Splenectomy
before RTR
Number of Sequential
Regimens
Donor
Characteristics
Mismatched
Loci
Recent Outcome Donor Chimerism

First 100 Days Day + 180 Recent
1 15/7 Female - 4100 Yes 1 MMUD C Alive FC FC FC
2 13/3 Male - 8350 Yes 1 MRD - Alive FC FC FC
3 12/9 Female - 3900 No 1 MRD - Dead (invasive
aspergillosis)
MC day +67 (65%) FC NA
4 14/7 Female - 1491 No 1 MRD - Alive FC FC FC
5 12/9 Female Diabetes mellitus 3315 Yes 1 MRD - Alive FC FC FC
6 10/9 Male Extramedullary
hemopoiesis
4816 Yes 1 MRD - Alive FC FC FC
7 10/9 Female - 3539 Yes 1 MMRD DRB1 Alive FC FC FC
8 16/4 Male - 3827 No 1 MRD - Dead (cerebellar
hemorrhage)
MC day +30 (86%) FC NA
9 10/9 Female - 2860 No 1 MRD - Alive FC FC FC
10 16 Male - 869 Yes 1 MRD - Alive FC FC FC
11 14/8 Male - 2892 No 2 MUD - Alive FC FC FC
12 16/5 Male - 1420 Yes 2 MRD - Alive FC FC FC
13 10/11 Female - 2550 No 2 MUD - Alive FC FC FC
14 16/2 Female - 5288 No 2 MMRD DRB1 Alive FC FC FC
15 10 Male - 1398 No 2 MMUD C Alive FC FC FC
16 9/4 Female - 1170 No 2 MRD (father) - Alive FC FC FC
17 15/3 Female - 2360 No 2 MUD - Alive FC FC FC
18 17/5 Female Pulmonary
hypertension
7690 No 2 MRD - Alive FC FC FC

RTR indicates reduced-toxicity regimen; MRD, matched related donor; MMRD mismatched related donor; MUD, matched unrelated donor; FC, full donor chimerism; MC, mixed donor chimerism; NA, not available.

Sequential Immunosuppressive Pharmacotherapy

Ten patients received 1 cycle if ISPT and 8 received 2 cycles of ISPT consisting of Flu 40 mg/m2/day i.v. for 5 days and Dex 25 mg/m2/day i.v. for 5 days. This was administered every 28 days for 1 or 2 cycles before the start of the conditioning regimen. ISPT is given to suppress recipient T cell function and facilitate sustainable engraftment, while decreasing the risk of GVHD and improving disease control. Two patients in the first 10-patient group, who received only 1 cycle of Flu-Dex, had unstable donor chimerism in the first 100 days post-HSCT. Because there was no clinical toxicity from the Flu-Dex, we administered 2 cycles, 28 days apart, in the next 8 patients. In addition, all patients had received hydroxyurea 20 mg/kg/day daily for at least 3 months before entering our program [5].

Conditioning Regimen

The reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine 35 mg/m2 i.v. once daily for 6 days (day -9 to day -4), busulfan 130 mg/m2 i.v. once daily for 4 days (day -9 to day -6), and rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG; Thymoglobulin; Sanofi-Genzyme Canada, Ontario, Canada) 1.5 mg/kg/day from day -3 to day -1. This regimen was modified from regimens described by Russell et al. [8] and de Lima et al. [9].

Stem Cell Grafts

Seventeen donors received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 10 µg/kg/day for 5 days before the leukapheresis procedures. Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were collected to target 5–10 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg recipient weight. One donor donated bone marrow.

GVHD Prophylaxis

GVHD prophylaxis was started 3 days before HSCT. Patients who received a related donor transplantation were given cyclosporine, and those who received an unrelated donor transplantation were given tacrolimus. All patients received mycophenolate mofetil from day +1 to day +60.

Monitoring of Chimerism

Chimerism was monitored from engraftment and every 2 weeks during the first 100 days after HSCT, using variable number of tandem repeats analyses (for donor–recipient sex match) and fluorescein in situ hybridization for X and Y chromosomes (for donor–recipient sex mismatch).

T Cell Function Testing

T cell function was tested by phytohemagglutination (PHA) stimulation before and after sequential ISPT. Proliferation of T cells was detected by a carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CSFE) assay as described previously. T cell proliferation was evaluated based on a stimulation index, calculated as the percentage of CFSElowCD4+ T cells with PHA divided by the percentage of CFSElowCD4+ T cells without PHA [10].

Statistics

Survival probability was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Regimen-Related Toxicity, Infections, and GVHD

Four patients had grade 1–2 mucositis (22%), and 3 patients had mild, reversible veno-occlusive disease (16%). One patient had shingles, 1 had generalized herpes zoster, and 1 had BK virus cystitis. Another 3 patients had cytomegalovirus reactivation. Four patients (22%) had acute grade II GVHD, and none had acute grade III–IV GVHD, although both patients who experienced secondary graft weakness and had immunosuppression held subsequently developed acute grade III GVHD that resolved with systemic steroid administration. Thus, the overall incidence of grade III–IV GVHD was 11%. Five patients (28%) developed limited chronic GVHD, and none had extensive chronic GVHD.

Engraftment and Graft Rejection

T cell–replete PBSCs were given to all but 1 patient, who received bone marrow. The median infused cell dose was 9.4 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (range, 4.67 to 19.26 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg). All patients developed full donor chimerism with engraftment. Immunosuppressive treatment was successfully weaned and discontinued by 6 months post-HSCT in the patients receiving a matched related donor graft and by 12 months post-HSCT in those receiving a matched unrelated donor graft. However, 2 patients (patients 3 and 8) subsequently suffered secondary mixed chimerism within the first 100 days (65% and 86% donor chimerism, respectively), and immune suppression was withdrawn for 1–2 weeks until full donor chimerism was reestablished. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was 12 days (range, 11 to 18 days), and that to platelet engraftment was 18 days (range, 12 to 42 days).

Clinical Outcome

With a median follow-up of 42 months (range, 4 to 75 months), the 5-year overall survival (OS) and thalassemia-free survival (TFS) rates were both 89% (95% CI, 56%–96%), as shown in Figure 1A. Karnofsky/Lansky performance status was 100% in all surviving patients at the most recent follow-up.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Overall survival (OS) and thalassemia-free survival in 18 high-risk class 3 thalassemia patients enrolled in this study. (B) Stimulation index [the percentage of CFSElowCD4+ T cells (with PHA) divided by the percentage CFSElowCD4+ T cells (without PHA)] from T cell function test performed prior to the first cycle of sequential immunoablative chemotherapy (1st), prior to the second cycle of immunoablative chemotherapy (2nd) and prior to the conditioning regimen for HSCT (3rd).

Two patients (patients 3 and 8) developed secondary mixed donor chimerism and had immunosuppression held to allow reestablishment of full donor chimerism. The mixed donor chimerism resolved, but the ensuing grade III acute GVHD necessitated systemic corticosteroid administration. Unfortunately, 1 of these patients subsequently died of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, and the other suffered a lethal cerebellar hemorrhage due to an unrelated trauma after discharge from the hospital.

T cell function tests were performed in 3 patients (patients 14, 16, and 18) who received 2 cycles of Flu-Dex. The data suggest that T cell function was indeed significantly suppressed after 2 cycles of sequential ISPT. The first assay was performed before the initiation of Flu-Dex, and the third assay was performed before the start of pretransplantation conditioning (Figure 1B). We tested T cell function only in these 3 patients because we performed this test only for the last 5 patients in our cohort, and the blood samples from patients 15 and 17 were missing. During ISPT, neither infection nor neutropenia occurred, and no patient developed kidney or brain toxicity.

DISCUSSION

Matched unrelated donor HSCT is a potentially curative option for patients with high-risk thalassemia, with clinical outcomes comparable to those from matched sibling donor HSCT [11]. Pretransplantation therapies include administration of hydroxyurea and azathioprine to eradicate marrow and hypertransfusion and aggressive chelation to suppress endogenous erythropoiesis [12,13]. Recently introduced reduced-intensity conditioning regimens carry some concerns regarding the risk of graft failure or rejection [11]. One of the major risk factors for graft rejection is mixed donor chimerism, which was found in approximately one-third of the patients [14]. Several approaches have been taken to treat patients with mixed donor chimerism, including cessation of immunotherapy and use of donor lymphocyte infusion.

Previous studies have reported TFS rates of 50%–80% after HSCT in patients with thalassemia with high-risk class 3 features, such as older age and hepatomegaly [24,6,7,15]. The present study demonstrates that a TFS rate of approximately 90% can be achieved. We included patients with not only high-risk class 3 features, but also comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, extramedullary hematopoieisis, pulmonary hypertension, and previous splenectomy [16]; furthermore, some of the patients received grafts from mismatched donors. With this adverse risk information in mind, we suggest that our approach should be considered promising for use in this high-risk group. If our data are confirmed, then this novel strategy should be applied in standard-risk patients as well.

The conditioning regimen used in this study was based on our previously published nucleoside analog-alkylating agent platform concept [17], providing initial immune suppression from the nucleoside analog but with long-term stable engraftment facilitated mostly by the alkylating agent busulfan. We did not add irradiation, cyclophosphamide, or other alkylating agents to the regimen. This approach may reduce the risk for long-term toxicities, such as cardiopulmonary toxicity and secondary malignancies, but further study in a larger cohort is needed. The successful use of a myeloablative, reduced-toxicity regimen is hampered to only a minor extent by possible infertility; however, this will be addressed in the next-generation studies using a modified concept based on the platform described in this report.

Given that the persistence of recipient antigen-presenting cells in the post-HSCT period could potentially increase the risk of GVHD from the alloantigens present to donor T cells, our sequential immunosuppressive pharmacotherapy consisting of Flu and Dex not only suppresses recipient T cell function and facilitates sustainable engraftment, but also ensures the complete elimination of recipient antigen-presenting cells. Moreover, Flu-containing conditioning regimens, including the conditioning regimen used in this study (Flu, busulfan, and ATG) are reportedly associated with a decreased incidence of GVHD [18,19].

In conclusion, a key success factor in our safe and efficacious program is the sequential use of immunosuppressive pharmacotherapy followed by a reduced-toxicity conditioning program rather than striving for maximum intensity of the conditioning program itself, paired with a relatively high number of hematopoietic progenitor cells (on average >5 × 106 CD34+ cells/ kg of recipient weight [5,20]), which resulted in a low incidence of toxicity and durable engraftment in this group of patients with high-risk class 3 thalassemia.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Financial disclosure: This study was supported by funding from the Ramathibodi Foundation, a National Research University grant, and a Mahidol University research grant.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement: There are no conflicts of interest to report.

Authorship statement: U.A. participated in study design, data collection, and manuscript preparation. S.P., P.R., N.S., D.S., A.C., S. Sirieung, P.C., A.J., S.I., A.U., R.S., S. Srisala, and B.S.A. participated in draft revisions and patient monitoring. S.H. contributed to the study design, statistical analyses, and manuscript preparation. All authors approved the final manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Lucarelli G, Clift R. Marrow transplantation in thalassemia. 3rd ed. Malden (MA): Blackwell Scientific; 2004. p. 1412. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mathews V, George B, Deotare U, et al. A new stratification strategy that identifies a subset of class III patients with an adverse prognosis among children with beta thalassemia major undergoing a matched related allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:889–894. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sabloff A, Chandy M, Wang Z, et al. HLA-matched sibling bone marrow transplantation for thalassemia major. Blood. 2011;117:1745–1750. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-306829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sodani P, Gaziev D, Polchi P, et al. New approach for bone marrow transplantation in patients with class 3 thalassemia aged younger than 17 years. Blood. 2004;104:1201–1203. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-08-2800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hongeng S, Pakakasama S, Chuansumrit A, et al. Reduced-intensity stem cell transplantation for treatment of class 3 Lucarelli severe thalassemia patients. Am J Hematol. 2007;82:1095–1098. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bernado ME, Piras E, Vacca A, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in thalassemia major: results of reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen based on the use of treosulfan. Blood. 2012;120:473–476. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-423822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Choudhary D, Sharma SK, Gupta N, et al. Treosulfan-thiotepa-fludarabine–based conditioning regimen for allogeneic transplantation in patients with thalassemia major: a single-center experience from north India. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19:492–503. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Russell JA, Tran HT, Quinlan D, et al. Once-daily intravenous busulfan given with fludarabine as conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: study of pharmacokinetics and early clinical outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2002;8:468–476. doi: 10.1053/bbmt.2002.v8.pm12374451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.de Lima M, Couriel D, Thall PF, et al. Once-daily intravenous busulfan and fludarabine: clinical and pharmacokinetic results of a myeloablative, reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in AML and MDS. Blood. 2004;104:857–864. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-02-0414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Venken K, Thewwissen M, Hellings N, et al. A CFSE based assay for measuring CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell mediated suppression of autoantigen specific and polyclonal T cell responses. J Immunol Methods. 2007;322:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2007.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lucarelli G, Gaziev J. Advances in the allogeneic transplantation for thalassemia. Blood Rev. 2008;22:53–63. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2007.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lucarelli G, Isgro A, Sodani P, Gaziev J. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in thalassemia and sickle cell anemia. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Med. 2012;2:a011825. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Elborai Y, Uwubugambi A, Lehmann L. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for thalassemia. Immunotherapy. 2012;4:947–956. doi: 10.2217/imt.12.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lucarelli G, Andreani M, Angelucci E. The cure of thalassemia by bone marrow transplantation. Blood Rev. 2002;16:81–85. doi: 10.1054/blre.2002.0192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hussein AA, Al-Zaben A, Ghatasheh L, et al. Risk-adopted allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using a reduced-intensity regimen for children with thalassemia major. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013 doi: 10.1002/pbc.24493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pbc.24493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mathews V, George B, Lakshmi KM, et al. Impact of pretransplant splenectomy on patients with beta-thalassemia major undergoing a matched related allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2009;13:171–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2008.00953.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Valdez BC, Andersson BS. Interstrand crosslink inducing agents in pretransplant conditioning therapy for hematologic malignancies. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2010;51:659–668. doi: 10.1002/em.20603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Weiss L, Abdul-Hai L, Or R, Polliack A. Fludarabine in combination with cyclophosphamide decreases incidence of GVHD and maintains effective graft-versus-leukemia effect after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in murine lymphocytic leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003;31:11–15. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bredeson CM, Zhang MJ, Aqovi MA, et al. Outcomes following HSCT using fludarabine, busulfan, and Thymoglobulin: a matched comparison to allogeneic transplants conditioned with busulfan and cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14:993–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bradly MB, Sattler RM, Raftopoulos H, et al. Correction of phenotype on a thalassemia mouse model using nonmyeloablative marrow transplantation regimen. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2002;8:453–461. doi: 10.1053/bbmt.2002.v8.pm12234171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES