Highly Sensitive and Selective Colorimetric and Off-On Fluorescent Reversible Chemosensors for Al³⁺ Based on the Rhodamine Fluorophore

Abstract

A series of rhodamine derivatives L1–L3 have been prepared and characterized by IR, ¹H-NMR, ¹³C-NMR and ESI-MS. These compounds exhibited selective and sensitive “turn-on” fluorescent and colorimetric responses to Al³⁺ in methanol. Upon the addition of Al(III), the spiro ring was opened and a metal-probe complex was formed in a 1:1 stoichiometry, as was further confirmed by ESI-MS spectroscopy. The chemo-dosimeters L1–L3 exhibited good binding constants and low detection limits towards Al(III). We also successfully demonstrate the reversibility of the metal to ligand complexation (opened ring to spirolactam ring).

1. Introduction

Aluminum is the third most abundant element in the Earth's crust and second most widely used metal after iron for the manufacture of electrical equipment, automobiles, building construction, water purification, clinical drugs [1] and packaging materials [2], etc. Recent studies warn that the deposition of aluminum in bone and the nervous system of the human body can cause neurotoxicity in high dosage [3]. Unregulated amounts of aluminum in the human body may lead to Parkinson’s [4], Alzheimer’s [5,6] and dialysis [7] diseases. In plants, higher concentration of aluminum may affect the growth of root [8] and seed [9].

Thus, the monitoring of aluminum at the sub-micromolar level for biological, clinical and environmental purposes is highly desirable and indispensable. Various analytical techniques, including ion selective electrodes [10,11], colorimetric sensors [12,13], voltammetry [14], atomic absorption and emission spectrometry [15,16], chromatography [17] and inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy [18], etc., have been used to determine the presence of metal ions in different samples.

Among the various detection methods, the fluorescence sensing technique [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27] has become the most useful and popular in clinical, biology and environmental chemistry due to its non-destructive nature, high selectivity and sensitivity, real-time response and possible naked eye detection. The poor coordination ability of Al³⁺ compared to transition metal ions [28] is the major reason for the lesser development of Al³⁺ chemosensors. The use of the rhodamine moiety is a reliable way to construct “off-on” fluorescent probes because the sensing mechanism of rhodamine-derived probes is based on the structure change from their spirocyclic form (fluorescence “off”) to a ring-opened amide form (fluorescence “on”) induced by a specific chemical species such as a metal ion at room temperature [29,30].

Rhodamine derivatives are used widely as a fluorescent signal transducers due to their excellent photophysical properties such as long absorption and emission wavelengths, large absorption coefficients and high fluorescence quantum yields. In fact, fluorophores having a long emission wavelength (~550 nm) are often chosen to serve as a best signal transducers to avoid the influence of background fluorescence (below 500 nm) [31,32]. Recently, several rhodamine-based fluorescent chemosensors have been developed for different chemical species [33,34,35]. Herein, we report the synthesis of a series of rhodamine-derived chemosensors L1–L3 using the synthetic route outlined in Scheme 1. First, rhodamine B hydrazide (compound 1) was obtained from rhodamine B by treating it with hydrazine hydrate. Upon further refluxing with dialdehydes (a, b and c) compound 1 yielded the sensors L1, L2 and L3, which show a reversible, selective and sensitive fluorescence enhancement response to Al(III) in alcoholic media.

Scheme 1.

Synthetic Pathways to L1–L3.

2. Results and Discussion

The selectivity, sensitivity and binding mode of chemosensors toward Al³⁺ were examined through absorption, emission, ESI-MS, electrochemical (DPV) and ¹H-NMR experiments.

2.1. Absorption Spectroscopic Studies

The binding capacity of the probes (50 µM) toward various metal ions (50 µM) such as Al³⁺, Ba²⁺, Ca²⁺, Cd²⁺, Co²⁺, Cr³⁺, Cs⁺, Cu²⁺, Fe²⁺, Fe³⁺, Gd³⁺, Hg²⁺, K⁺, Li⁺, Mg²⁺, Mn²⁺, Na⁺, Nd³⁺, Ni²⁺, Pb²⁺, Sr²⁺ and Zn²⁺ was measured by UV-vis absorption studies. For example, the UV-vis spectrum of L3 exhibited a main absorption band in the 300–400 nm range. When aluminum ion was added to the probe, a strong absorption band at ~557 nm with a shoulder at ~519 nm appeared (Figure 1a). A weak absorption peak was observed with Cr³⁺ and Cu²⁺, while no peak appeared with the other metal ions even when in excess.

Figure 1.

(a) Absorbance spectra of L3 (50 µM) in presence of various metal ions (50 µM) in MeOH−DMSO (99:1 v/v). Inset: Visual color change of probe upon addition of Al³⁺; (b) Job’s plot for L1–L3 with Al³⁺, absorbance intensity at 557 nm was plotted as a function of the molar ratio.

The observable naked eye detection of the development of a magenta color in the probe (Figure 1a, inset) upon Al(III) addition involves a metal-induced delactonization of rhodamine. On complexation, the primary spirolactam form of the probe is converted into its ring opened amide conformation [36]. The plot of absorbance of L3 at 557 nm as a function of mole fraction of added Al³⁺ metal ion (Jobs plot) reveals that these probes bind to the metal ion in 1:1 stoichiometry (Figure 1b).

2.2. Fluorescence Emission Studies

The fluorescence spectral pattern of L3 when excited at 520 nm in the presence of various metal ions (Figure 2a) exposed that the non-fluorescent (OFF) behaviour becomes highly fluorescent (ON). Under a UV lamp, a spectacular color change of the probe solution from colorless to fluorescent pink occurred upon addition of Al³⁺, which could simply be detected by the naked-eye (Figure 2a, inset). This involves a delactonization process of the spirocyclic (non-fluorescent) form of rhodamine to its ring opened (highly fluorescent) form which is induced by metal ion coordination. The amount of chelation-enhanced fluorescence depends on nature of the ionophores and interacting metal ions. Among all the metal ions examined, these probes demonstrated high fluorescence enhancement at λ_em = ~587 nm in the presence of Al(III) ion.

Figure 2.

(a) Fluorescence spectra (λ_ex = 520 nm) of L3 (50 µM) in presence of various metal ions (50 µM) in MeOH−DMSO (99:1 v/v). Inset: Visual color change of probe upon addition of Al³⁺; (b) The fluorescence emission spectral pattern of L3 in the presence of increasing concentrations of Al³⁺ (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250 µM). Inset: Linear regression plot of fluorescence intensity change 1/(F-F₀) as a function of concentration 1/[Al³⁺] (top), fluorescence enhancement change as a function of concentration of Al(III) added (bottom).

The fluorescence emission spectral pattern of L1–L3 (50 µM) upon addition of increasing concentrations (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250 µM) of Al³⁺ ion changed, with a new emission band peak appearing at ~587 nm that increased in intensity with increasing Al³⁺ concentration (Figure 2b and Figure S3). The complex stability constants (K) calculated through the Benesi-Hildebrand method for Al(III) with L1–L3 were found to be 5.7 × 10³ M⁻¹, 1.6 × 10⁴ M⁻¹ and 1.9 × 10⁴ M⁻¹, respectively (Figure 2b and Figure S3, inset). The observable development of a fluorescent pink color in these probes is due to the formation of a highly delocalized π-conjugated probe system. The fluorescence enhancement is linearly proportional to Al³⁺ concentration from 2.1 × 10⁻⁵ M to 5.0 × 10⁻⁵ M (for L1), 1.0 × 10⁻⁶ M to 5.0 × 10⁻⁵ M (for L2) and 1.0 × 10⁻⁶ M to 3.5 × 10⁻⁵ M (for L3), and the detection limit of Al(III) was estimated based on the fluorescence titration profile as 6.0 × 10⁻⁷ M (for L1), 5.8 × 10⁻⁷ M (for L2) and 5.0×10⁻⁷ M (for L3) based on S/N = 3 (Figure 2b and Figure S3, inset). Moreover, to determine the stoichiometry of the probe-Al³⁺ complexes, the continuous variation (Job’s) method was used (Figure S4). As expected, the results suggested a 1:1 stoichiometry Al³⁺ to probe for the complexes, which was further proved by ESI-MS analysis (Figure 3 and Figure S5). Observed mass peaks at m/z 1173.5524, 1187.5739 and 1217.5821 corresponding to [L1 + Al]⁺, [L2 + Al]⁺ and [L3 + Al]⁺, respectively, were observed, which are solid proof for the formation of a 1:1 complex.

Figure 3.

ESI-MS spectrum of L3 upon addition of AlCl₃·6H₂O (1.0 eqiuv.) in MeOH.

Normally, the spiro rings of rhodamine and its derivatives are disturbed in acidic media and then show the absorbance and fluorescence characteristics of rhodamine. The absorbance and fluorescence responses of probe L3 in the presence of Al(III) in different pH values were estimated (Figure 4). The pH was adjusted by using dilute hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide. Initially, the metal solutions were prepared while adjusting the pH, then the sensor was further added into these solutions under vigorous stirring for 1 min. The probe-Al(III) absorbance gradually increased from pH 2 to 5 and reached a λ_max at pH 5. From pH 5 to 6.5 (neutral), the absorbance maxima moved downward. A small fluorescence enhancement accompanied by a red shift was observed with a pH change from 2 to 3, and a rapid fluorescence quenching accompanied by a red shift started while changing the pH from 3 to 5. Again, a quenching was observed with a blue shift from pH 5 to 6.5. A rigid structure is formed when interacting with H⁺ ions from acids and this can lead to a red shift. The absorbance (at 557 nm) and fluorescence emission (at 587 nm) bands of the probe-Al(III) complex disappeared under basic conditions (pH ≥ 7). The same spectral changes were observed for probe L3 alone under various pH conditions. The chemosensor L3 in the presence of Al(III) exhibited intense color changes in the different pH media, which could easily be detected by the naked-eye (Figure 4, inset).

Figure 4.

UV-vis absorbance (a) and fluorescence emission (b) spectral changes of L3 with Al³⁺ as a function of pH. Inset: Color changes of probe + Al³⁺ in different pH media under a normal (a) and UV (b) lamp (top), absorbance (a, at 557 nm) and emission (b, at 587 nm) intensities of L3 in the presence of Al³⁺ with pH variation (bottom).

To verify the selectivity of these probes towards Al(III) over other competitive metal ions, the emission intensity changes of L3 (50 µM) upon addition of other metal ions (50 µM) along with Al(III) were evaluated (Figure 5). The results revealed that Al(III)-induced fluorescence response was affected by the presence of Cr(III) and Cu(II), and uninfluenced in the presence of other potentially interfering ions. This experiment establishes the significant high selectivity of these probes towards Al(III) over other competitive metal ions (except Cr³⁺ and Cu²⁺).

Figure 5.

Competitive selectivity of probe L3 toward various metal ions (1.0 equiv.) in the absence (blue bars) and presence (red bars) of Al³⁺ (1.0 equiv.) with an excitation of 520 nm.

To examine the reversibility of the probe complexation with Al(III) ion, EDTA titration experiments were performed. Upon addition of EDTA to the solution containing probe L3 and Al(III) the fluorescence diminished significantly, whereas readdition of Al(III) ion could recover the fluorescence emission signal (Figure 6). All these results provide experimental evidence to support the reversibility of the spiro ring-opening and closing mechanism. The proposed binding mechanism of probes L1–L3 with Al(III) in the presence and absence of EDTA was shown in Scheme 2.

Figure 6.

The variation in fluorescence emission spectra of L3 + Al³⁺ upon addition of EDTA (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, 250 µM). Inset: Color changes of probe + Al³⁺ upon addition of EDTA (1.0 equiv.) (top), fluorescence spectral changes at 587 nm as a function of the amount of EDTA (bottom).

Scheme 2.

Proposed binding mechanism of Al(III) with probes in the presence and absence of EDTA.

Both the absorbance and fluorescence emission results indicate that probes show a good selectivity and sensitivity toward Al(III) over other metal ions (except Cr³⁺ and Cu²⁺). Absorbance, Emission enhancement factor and its related quantum yields of (L1–L3) in the absence and presence of Al(III) are collected in Table 1.

Table 1.

Absorbance and emission enhancement factor, and corresponding quantum yields of L1–L3 in the presence of Al(III).

System	Absorbance EF (I/Io*)	Emission EF (F/Fo*)	Quantum yield (Ф)
L1	1	1	<0.001
L1 + Al3+	616	14	0.11
L2	1	1	<0.001
L2 + Al3+	469	17	0.059
L3	1	1	<0.001
L3 + Al3+	577	17	0.054

* Io = Absorbance of probe at neutral pH at 557 nm, Fo = Emission intensity of probe at neutral pH at 587 nm.

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

The wavelength regarding to the band gap energy for probes is obtained from the cross point of the absorption onset line and the corrected baseline (Figure 7a) [37]. The corresponding wavelengths are 379, 381 and 383 nm, and are equal to energy band gaps of 3.27, 3.25 and 3.24 eV for L1, L2 and L3 respectively.

Figure 7.

(a) Absorption spectra and optical band gaps of probes L1–L3; (b) UV-vis absorption and fluorescence emission spectra of ligands and the corresponding Al³⁺ addition products in MeOH−DMSO (99:1 v/v).

The corresponding wavelength to band gap energy for probes with Al(III) can also be calculated from the cross point of absorption and emission onset lines (Figure 7b). The corresponding wavelengths are 573, 572 and 574 nm, which are equal to energy band gaps of 2.16, 2.17 and 2.16 eV for L1 + Al(III), L2 + Al(III) and L3 + Al(III), respectively.

Figure 8 and S9 shows the current-voltage curve obtained for probes L1–L3 in the absence and presence of Al(III) in Differential Pulse Voltammetric experiments. As the results show, L1, L2 and L3 alone show oxidation potentials of 0.584, 0.572 and 0.592 V which are equal to E_HOMO = −5.38, −5.37 and −5.39 eV, respectively. The corresponding oxidation potentials for L1–L3 in the presence of Al(III) ions are 0.588, 0.592 and 0.596 V, which are equal to E_HOMO = −5.39, −5.39 and −5.40 eV, respectively. By addition of Al(III) ion, changes occurred in the oxidation potentials of the probes due to the decrease in the electron releasing nature of the probe-Al³⁺ complexes. LUMO energy levels were estimated as −2.11, −2.12, −2.15, −3.23, −3.22 and −3.24, respectively, from the HOMO and band gap energies.

Figure 8.

Differential pulse voltammograms recorded for L3, and the corresponding Al³⁺ addition product in MeOH − DMSO (99:1 v/v).

This experiment proves an increase in oxidation potential and a decrease in band gap due to strong interactions between the probes L1–L3 and aluminum ion. Figure 9 shows the energy diagram with the HOMO/LUMO levels of probes alone and in the presence of Al(III).

Figure 9.

Energy level diagram of the probes and the corresponding Al³⁺ addition products.

2.4. ¹H-NMR Titration

To better usnderstand the interaction between the probe L3 and Al³⁺, proton NMR titration experiments were performed in the presence of various amounts of Al³⁺ in a DMSO-d₆ + CD₃OD solvent mixture (Figure 10). Upon complexation with Al³⁺ ion, the signal of the imine proton (H_h) of the Schiff base moiety at 8.82 ppm steadily disappeared. Similarly the signals of the aryl-protons H_e, H_f and H_g of the rhodamine moiety came together then to give a typical complex signal (see Supplementary Information for more details).

Figure 10.

¹H-NMR titration of L3 with Al³⁺ in DMSO-d6 + CD₃OD.

To investigate the practical application of sensing probes L1–L3, polymeric thin films were prepared [38]. Polyvinyl chloride (PVC, 100 mg), bis(2-ethylhexyl)sebacate (as plasticizer, 200 mg) and probe were dissolved in THF (5 mL). The homogeneous mixture obtained after completion of dissolution of all ingredients was concentrated by evaporation of the THF at room temperature. This homogeneous mixture was poured onto a clean glass surface. The solvent was allowed to evaporate to give a non-fluorescent polymeric membrane sensor that was used for Al³⁺ detection. A solution containing Al³⁺ in methanol (1 mM) was sprayed onto the film, and upon evaporation of the solvent a strong fluorescent image appeared on the Al³⁺ exposed regions (Figure 11). Both Cu²⁺ and Cr³⁺ ions can also be detected colorimetrically by using this membrane, whereas the Cr³⁺ complex showed a weak fluorescence and the complex of Cu²⁺ with the L3 chemosensor is fluorescence inactive. Thus, it could be used for simultaneous detection of Al³⁺ and Cu²⁺.

Figure 11.

Photographs of ligand doped PVC polymeric thin films under visible (a) and fluorescent light (b).

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Reagents and Apparatus

Rhodamine B, metal salts and other commercially available chemicals were purchased from Merck (Mumbai, India) and Aldrich (Bangalore, India) and used without further purification. The melting points were recorded on an OptiMelt Automated melting point system (SRS, CA, USA). The IR spectra were measured on a PerkinElmer FT-IR spectrometer (CA, USA) in the range 4000–400 cm⁻¹ with KBr. The NMR spectra were recorded by using a Bruker 500 MHz instrument (MA, USA), using TMS as an internal standard, CDCl₃, DMSO-d₆, and CD₃OD are taken as solvents. The mass spectra were obtained on a Bruker-micrOTOF II (MA, USA). The UV-vis absorption spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-2450 spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan) and the Fluorescent spectra were recorded by using Horiba FluoroMax-4 spectrofluorophotometer (Kyoto, Japan). Differential Pulse Voltammetric experiments were performed using a CHI760E electrochemical workstation (Austin, TX, USA) with a conventional three-electrode configuration consisting of a glassy carbon working electrode, a platinum wire counter electrode, and a calomel reference electrode.

3.2. Synthesis and Characterization

Chemosensors L1–L3 were prepared by following the literature method [39] and the structures were characterised by FT-IR, ¹H-NMR, ¹³C-NMR and ESI-MS spectra. Compounds a, b and c were prepared according to our previous work [12,38,39,40].

3.2.1. Preparation of Rhodamine-B hydrazide (1)

Rhodamine B (2.0 g) was dissolved in ethanol (50 mL). Hydrazine hydrate (2.5 mL) was then added dropwise with vigorous stirring at room temperature. After the addition, the stirred solution was allowed to reflux for about 6–8 h. The solution changed from dark pink to light orange. Then the mixture was cooled and solvent was removed under reduced pressure. HCl (1 M, about 50 mL) was added to the mixture in the flask to generate a clear red solution. After that, 1 M NaOH was added slowly with stirring until the pH of the solution reached 9–10. The resulting precipitate was filtered and washed 4–5 times with water (15 mL each time). After drying under reduced pressure, the reaction yielded 1.8 g (95%) of 1 as a pink solid. Mp: 176–178 °C; FT-IR (KBr), ν, cm⁻¹: 1614 (C=O), 1379, 1118 (C−N), 1224, 1015 (C−O); ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃), δ (ppm): 1.16 (12H, t, J = 6.5 Hz), 3.34 (8H, d, J = 6.5 Hz), 3.62 (2H, s), 6.29 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.42–6.47 (4H, m), 7.11 (1H, s), 7.45 (2H, s), 7.93 (1H, s); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃), δ (ppm): 12.6, 44.4, 65.9, 98.0, 104.6, 108.1, 123.0, 123.8, 128.1, 130.0, 132.5, 148.9, 151.5, 153.8, 166.1. ESI-MS m/z: Calcd for C₂₈H₃₂N₄O₂ [M + H]⁺: 457.2604, found: 457.2500.

3.2.2. Preparation of Compounds L1–L3

Rhodamine hydrazide (1, 0.23 g, 0.5 mmol) and dialdehyde a, b or c (0.25 mmol) were dissolved in absolute ethanol (20 mL) and the reaction mixture was refluxed for 24 h. The obtained solid was filtered and washed three times with ethanol (10 mL). The product was dried under vacuum, affording pink solids of L1–L3, respectively.

IUPAC name (L1). Yield: 0.14 g (48%); Mp: 187–189 °C; FT-IR (KBr), ν, cm⁻¹: 1616 (C=O), 1309, 1116 (C−N), 1226 (C−O); ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃), δ (ppm): 1.04 (24H, t, J = 6.5 Hz), 3.20 (16H, s), 4.18 (4H, s), 6.22 (4H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 6.39 (4H, s), 6.54 (4H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 6.95 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.00 (2H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.07 (2H, d, J = 6.5 Hz), 7.31 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.46 (4H, qn, J = 7.0 Hz), 8.01 (4H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 8.69 (2H, s); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃), δ (ppm): 12.5, 44.2, 65.5, 66.2, 97.8, 105.6, 108.1, 112.3, 121.2, 123.4, 123.7, 124.2, 126.4, 128.1, 128.2, 128.6, 130.8, 133.3, 141.4, 148.9, 152.5, 152.8, 157.0, 165.1. ESI-MS m/z: Calcd for C₇₂H₇₄N₈O₆ [M + Na]⁺: 1169.5629, found: 1169.5682.

IUPAC name (L2). Yield: 0.17 g (58%); Mp: 156–158 °C; FT-IR (KBr), ν, cm⁻¹: 1614 (C=O), 1306, 1112 (C−N), 1227 (C−O); ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃), δ (ppm): 1.09 (24H, t, J = 6.5 Hz), 2.05 (2H, s), 3.25 (16H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 3.99 (4H, s), 6.23 (4H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 6.41 (4H, s), 6.56 (4H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 6.86 (4H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.07 (2H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.21 (2H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.44 (4H, t, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.93 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.99 (2H, d, J = 6.5 Hz), 8.80 (2H, s); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃), δ (ppm): 12.6, 29.5, 44.2, 64.8, 65.6, 98.0, 106.0, 108.1, 112.0, 120.6, 123.4, 123.6, 124.0, 126.5, 127.8, 128.1, 128.6, 130.7, 133.2, 142.6, 148.9, 152.4, 152.8, 157.5, 165.2. ESI-MS m/z: Calcd for C₇₃H₇₆N₈O₆Na⁺ [M + Na]⁺: 1183.5786, found: 1183.5770.

IUPAC name (L3). Yield: 0.18 g (60%); Mp: 224–226 °C; FT-IR (KBr), ν, cm⁻¹: 1614 (C=O), 1303, 1115 (C−N), 1227 (C−O); ¹H-NMR (CDCl₃), δ (ppm): 1.12 (24H, t, J = 6.5 Hz), 3.28 (16H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 3.83 (4H, s), 4.01 (4H, s), 6.22 (4H, d, J = 8.5 Hz), 6.43 (4H, s), 6.54 (4H, d, J = 9.0 Hz), 6.77 (2H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 6.85 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.10–7.16 (4H, m), 7.46 (4H, qn, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.84 (2H, d, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.97 (2H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 9.06 (2H, s); ¹³C-NMR (CDCl₃), δ (ppm): 12.6, 44.3, 65.9, 68.3, 69.7, 98.0, 106.3, 108.0, 113.0, 121.0, 123.3, 123.8, 124.5, 126.3, 127.9, 128.1, 129.4, 130.8, 133.1, 143.8, 148.8, 151.9, 153.2, 157.4, 164.8. ESI-MS m/z: Calcd for C₇₄H₇₈N₈O₇ [M + Na]⁺: 1213.5891, found: 1213.5852.

4. Conclusions

The newly synthesized fluoroionophores L1–L3 based on rhodamine exhibit good selectivity and sensitivity toward Al³⁺ ion over other tested metal ions in MeOH−DMSO (99:1 v/v). They exhibited a reversible absorption and fluorescence enhancement toward Al(III) via a 1:1 binding mode at neutral pH. A polymeric thin film can be prepared by doping PVC with a probe L1–L3. Such a thin layer can be used as a sensor to detect Al³⁺ with high selectivity.

Author Contributions

In this paper, probes were designed by V.K.G.; N.M. performed research and analyzed the data; A.K.S. wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.