Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative brain disorder which is around 1.5 times more common in men than in women. Currently, drug medications, surgery, and lifestyle changes are common approaches to PD, while all of them focused on reducing the symptoms. Therefore, regenerative medicine based on stem cell (SC) therapies has raised a promising hope. Various types of SCs have been used in basic and experimental studies relevant to PD, including embryonic pluripotential stem cells, mesenchymal (MSCs) and induced pluripotent SCs (iPSCs). MSCs have several advantages over other counterparts. They are easily accessible which can be obtained from various tissues such as bone marrow, adipose tissue, peripheral blood, etc. with avoiding ethical problems. Therefore, MSCs is attractive clinically because there are no related ethical and immunological concerns . Further studies are needed to answer some crucial questions about the different issues in SC therapy. Accordingly, SC-based therapy for PD also needed more complementary evaluation in both basic and clinical study areas.
Keywords: Cellular therapy, Neurodegenerative diseases, Parkinson’s disease, Stem cell
Introduction
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the first or second most common neurodegenerative brain disorder after Alzheimer’s disease that affects the control of body movements (1, 2). First time PD was formally described in "An Essay on the Shaking Palsy," published in 1817 by a London physician named James Parkinson (3). It is resulted from the degeneration of dopamine-producing nerve cells in the substantianigra, a region in the mesencephalon that controls movement. This degeneration results in a reduction of a neurotransmitter called dopamine in the brain which is necessary for regulating of body movement. Clinical signs of PD appear when about 70% of the dopamine-producing neurons are damaged. Symptoms of PD include slow physical movements (bradykinesia), shaking (tremor), muscle stiffness (rigidity) and postural instability (impaired balance and coordination), and pain (4-7). PD is about 1.5 times more common in men than in women, and its prevalence increases with age. It affects about 1%–2% of the population over 70 years of age (8). The causes of PD are still unknown, however a number of researchers believe that it develops in response to a combination of certain genetic and non-genetic factors (9).
Current treatments for Parkinson’s disease
There is currently no cure for PD thus; several treatments have focused on relieving the symptoms (10). Accordingly, current treatments include the use of oral preparations of L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) and dopamine receptor agonists, apomorphine in more serious cases, continuous intestinal infusion of L-DOPA, and deep brain stimulation (DBS) in subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus by using surgically implanted electrodes (11). Therefore, pharmacological treatments are based on the uptake of levodopa (L-DOPA) and inhibition of dopamine degrading by using dopamine agonists and also dopamine degrading enzymes inhibitors. Today, dopamine receptor agonists are used as the first choice to delay the starting of L-DOPA. Furthermore, they will be useful in advanced stage of PD as adjunct therapy with L-DOPA. Their mechanism of action is stimulation of presynaptic and postsynaptic dopamine receptors. Levodopa as a known medication for PD treatment has been used to relieve the effects of dopamine deficiency. Unfortunately, its therapeutic effect is reduced after around 3-5 years (8, 12-15). As well, there are some other medications that are used for PD for instance; Bromocriptine, Pramipexole, Ropinirole, anticholinergic medications (e.g., Benztropine), monoamine oxidase B inhibitors (MAO-B-I), Amantadine, and DBS which stimulates the part of brain affected by PD (16, 17). MAO-B-I can stabilize the dopamine levels in the synaptic cleft. Selegiline and Rasagiline are two irreversible MAO-B inhibitors that catalyse the oxidative deamination of active amines and cause prolonged dopamine activity (18). Also, here are some other types of Levodopa degradation inhibitors such as catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors (19). All of these treatments have some considerable side effects such as wearing off phenomena, motor fluctuation, and abnormal movements as dyskinesia. On the other hand, DBS as a surgical treatment has some serious limitations. It is costly and generally considered for late stage disease without dementia. Furthermore, it can produce cognitive disorders, which may be permanent (8). As current therapeutic approaches for PD only provide symptomatic relief with serious limitations therefore, some alternative treatments such as regenerative medicine and stem cells (SCs) therapy are necessary (20-22). There are several types of (stem) cells that have been investigated as potential candidates for cellular therapy in various neurological disorders such as spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, stroke, and PD, including embryonic pluripotential SCs, fetal or adult SCs (hematopoietic and mesenchymal SCs), iPSCs from different sources, and human fetal ventral mesencephalic (hfVM) tissue that contains nigral dopaminergic cells (23-29). Different types of stem cells have been investigated for treatment of PD with specific advantages and disadvantages (Table 1). The purpose of this review is to describe various sources of SCs that are candidate for treatment of PD.
Table 1 . Advantages and disadvantages of stem cell types used in Parkinson’s disease (11, 26, 30, 31) .
Type of stem cell | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Embryonic stem cell (ESCs) |
(a) Highly proliferative/pluripotent (b) Able to form all three germ layer (c) Generate dopaminergic neurons (d) Transplantation survival/some degree of functional recovery |
(a) Risk of tumor formation (b) Ethical issues (c) Genomic instability |
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) |
(a) Unlimited PD patient-specific cells/autologous transplantation (b) Transplantation survival/some degree of functional recovery (c) Minimized immune reactions and ethical issues |
(a) Risk of tumor formation (b) In autologous transplantation risk of susceptibility to the original pathology of the patient |
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) |
(a) Improve motor performance in mice (b) No reported adverse effects in humans (c) A realistic cell source for regenerative medicine (d) Easily accessible from different tissues |
(a) Modest clinical improvement in humans |
Fetal brain neural stem cells (fNSCs) |
(a) Lower risk of tumor formation and immune rejection in comparison with ESCs (b) Ability to differentiate into neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and dopamine neurons |
(a) Limited differentiation in vivo (b) Partial effect in PD-like symptoms (C) Risk of GIDs (d) Ethical issues (e) Histocompatibility concerns (f) limited supply |
Embryonic stem cells (ESCs)
These are “pluripotent cells” derived from the inner cell mass of a blastocyst (2, 32) and can differentiate into any type of cell in the body for instance, nigral dopaminergic neurons (33-35). On the other hand, human ESCs are a source of dopamine neurons for transplantation in PD (36, 37). It has been demonstrated that, embryonic pluripotential stem cells-derived dopaminergic neurons generate functional recovery after transplantation into the striatum of PD in animal models (38). However, there are some serious concerns about the use of these cells for treatment of PD or other neurodegenerative diseases. Tumor formation is one of the most important adverse effects which can be avoided by cell sorting, prolonged differentiation and subsequently exhaustion in vitro before transplantation (11, 39-42). Several animal studies have shown a mild to moderate improvement in PD symptoms after transplantation of ESCs or neural stem cells differentiated from embryonic pluripotential stem cells (38, 43-45).
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)
MSCs are multipotent cells which can be commonly isolated from bone marrow. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) are the most well studied MSCs. Additionally, there are some other MSCs sources, such as umbilical cord, dermis, adipose tissue, peripheral blood, etc. (29, 31, 46-48). They have potentially self–renewal property with differentiation capacity into a variety of cells such as osteoblasts, chondrocytes, myocytes, adipocytes, fibroblasts, neurons, and also dopaminergic neurons (48-50). MSCs can protect injured tissues to generate a wide spectrum of cells, for instance, dopamine neurons, which can renew damaged or lost cells in PD (31, 51, 52). Although, it has been demonstrated that embryonic pluripotential stem cells and neural stem cells (NSCs) are considerable candidates for transplantation therapy in neurodegenerative diseases (53), there are some limitations on using of them such as potential problems of cell regulation, ethical issues, and probability of tumorigenicity. Accordingly, several studies showed that MSCs have a high therapeutic potential against neurological diseases, without the mentioned limitations. In addition, MSCs are readily accessible, isolated and expanded easily with no risk of rejection (54). MSCs have low immunogenic properties due to the lack of MHC-II (55). Furthermore, they have protective effects on dopaminergic neurons loss in animal models and human (56-64). Some experimental studies elucidated that MSCs are potentially useful as vectors for treating a variety of central nervous system disorders (65). These findings also revealed MSCs ability to trans-differentiate into special neurons which is a substantial factor for treating neurodegenerative disorders. Some clinical transplantation trials are performed by using MSCs for treatment of PD. For instance, autologous BMSCs were used in a clinical trial in which patients followed for up to 36 months after transplantation. This trial showed partial improvement with no tumor formation or other side effects. Although MSCs have been promising candidate for treatment of PD, more clinical studies are needed regarding MSC transplantation and its safety and efficacy (31).
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)
iPSCs are usually derived from adult somatic cells, such as fibroblasts by overexpressing self-renewal and pluripotency factors (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and Myc) (66, 67). Besides pluripotency and self-renewal properties, iPSCs have some advantages as a source for cell-replacement therapies. For instance, the opportunity to obtain the reprogrammed cells directly from the patients, thus potentially reducing the risk of transmissible infections and immune reactions following cellular therapy (68). Rather, using iPSCs in basic and clinical researches has no ethical limitations. In other words, for treatment of PD, patients own somatic cells can be differentiated into a pluripotent state to produce dopaminergic neurons which could be transplanted into the patient’s brain (69, 70). iPSCs are counterparts of embryonic pluripotential stem cells in morphology, proliferation, surface antigens, and ability to differentiate into three germ layer cells (71). Several basic and clinical investigations elucidated promising role of iPSCs in regenerating dopaminergic neurons as the underlying factor in treatment of PD. Transplantation of these cells into the striatum ameliorated PD symptoms (10, 11, 31, 72, 73). Although, the use of iPSCs has various advantages, the risk for tumor formation is a serious obstacle to use these cells in clinical transplantation trials. Accordingly, it is needed to minimize this risk and the probability of genetic mutations before translating iPSCs related basic science into clinical setting in PD (11, 74, 75).
Other tissue sources
Different tissues were used for treatment of PD including; carotid body, sympathetic ganglion neurons, and adrenal medulla. Carotid body is located in the bifurcation of common carotid artery and has some dopaminergic cells as an alternative treatment in PD (76-78). Likewise, sympathetic ganglion tissue from cervical and thoracic sympathetic trunk can be implanted into the striatum in PD (79). In addition, adrenal medullary tissue as a source of dopaminergic neurons is another choice for treatment of PD with limited benefits (80).
Conclusion
Current treatments and medications of PD try to relieve motor symptoms by providing dopamine substitutes or dopamine receptors agonists and also in advanced PD patients, apomorphine, continuous intestinal administration of L-Dopa, and DBS (19, 81). Although these treatments have some effects on controlling symptoms, their adverse effects are considerable. Additionally, they cannot replace or regenerate the lost dopaminergic neurons. While, cellular therapy using stem cells extracted from different sources such as, hfVM tissue can provide dopaminergic neurons regeneration, replacement, and reinnervation and also symptomatic relief lasting for several years following transplantation in some cases that were able to withdraw from L-DOPA therapy (11, 18, 19, 26, 82). Therefore, it is the time to apply a novel and more effective treatment for PD by cellular therapy and regenerative medicine. Nowadays, stem cell therapy has turned into an attractive field of science for researchers and consequently stem cells have been optimized to use for treatment of various neurological disorders based on their potential to differentiate into neural cells. In particular, these cells could be induced to generate dopaminergic neurons for an effective treatment of PD (31). Although, there are no good-established inclusion criteria for patient selection, several clinical trials have introduced criteria to include the PD patients in their trials (83). For instance, some studies have included patients with at least 2 features of PD (tremor, rigidity, or bradykinesia), good response to L-dopa, and intact higher mental functions (84) and also a minimum of 7 years of treatment, the presence of intractable problems (more advanced stages), taking L-dopa for several years and established L-dopa induced dyskinesia (8). In addition, more precise inclusion criteria have been introduced in some ongoing clinical trials. For instance, a clinical trial has described the inclusion criteria as below;
- Males and females aged 18-80 years.
- Current diagnosis of PD with motor complications according to standard criteria.
- Responsiveness to dopa agonists.
- Stage 2.5, 3 & 4 based-on HOEHN & YAHR staging.
- Stable medications for 60 days prior to the surgery.
- No gross atrophy or any other pathology of brain in MRI.
- Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale (MADRS) less than 19 for depression.
- No significant cognitive impairment (MMSE > 21) (85).
Obviously, better realizing the underlying basic and cellular mechanisms of PD could help scientists to explicate safe and efficient stem cell-based approaches to overcome side effects such as uncontrolled differentiation and growth which can induce tumor formation. Although, it is elucidated that dopaminergic neurons generated from stem cells can be the best candidate for treatment of PD, It is needed to understand more about the basic etiology of PD, also dopaminergic cell differentiation, regeneration, and function. MSCs have several advantages over embryonic pluripotential stem cells. iPSCs, and neural stem cells, for example, they can be obtained from patients for auto even allo-transplantation (31). Moreover, MSCs are easily accessible that can be obtained from different types of tissues such as bone marrow, adipose tissue, peripheral blood, etc. with no ethical problems (86). Accordingly, it seems that MSCs are the ideal candidate and maybe ready to translate from the basic and experimental researches to the clinical transplantation trials in various diseases including, neurological disorders and PD. On the other hand, embryonic pluripotential stem cells, iPSCs, and also fetal stem cells have some valuable properties in comparison with adult MSCs for instance, pluripotency and self-renewal capacity, which introduce them as a considerable source for research and future cellular therapies. Of course, various ethical problems and safety concerns (e.g. tumorigenesis), are needed to overcome by performing further investigations in both fields (11). Generally, against the promising clinical potential of (stem) cell based therapies, there are also potential risks. Some of the considerable risks of stem cell based therapies include; 1) transplantation site reactions, 2) immune response to the transplanted cells, 3) biodistribution/ectopic grafting, 4) unintended differentiation into another cell type, 5) tumorigenicity, and 6) lack of functional characteristics (30). As it has been described, there are various cell or stem cell sources that have been used for treatment of PD, but the most successful clinical trials have applied hfVM tissue to treat PD (26). Therefore, we are trying to explain more details of the characteristics, complications, and different aspects of this treatment in comparison with other types of cellular therapies. Following implantation of hfVM tissue, survival of grafted dopaminergic neurons, has been shown in the PD patients’ brain striatum using positron emission tomography (PET), and histopathological methods (86, 87). Dopaminergic grafts can be functionally integrated into neural circuitries in brain (87). Additionally, it has been demonstrated that, afferent and efferent synaptic connections can be established between grafted and host neurons. Long-term survival of the implanted grafts have been reported several years (more than 10 years) after transplantation (86, 88) with acceptable function and restoring dopamine release in the PD patient’s brain (87). Alternatively, following stem cell transplantation, dopamine restoring could be provided by two different paths; 1) in vitro pre-differentiation of stem cells toward dopaminergic neurons prior to transplantation, 2) In vivo differentiation toward dopaminergic neurons after implantation into the PD patient’s brain (86). Consequently, HfVM tissue transplantation has some complications such as producing Lewy bodies after transplantation and graft-induced dyskinesias (GID) (26, 87). Furthermore, there were lack of homogeneity of effects in initial clinical trials and also they caused GID as a considerable adverse event in a subgroup of patients (11). Accordingly, the most serious complication after hfVM tissue transplantation is GIDs which can be treated with DBS in the globus pallidus (87). Various studies showed that GIDs are caused by the hfVM graft-derived serotonergic hyperinnervation. These investigations supported some evidence-based strategies for avoiding GIDs following treatment of PD using hfVM tissue or stem cells. As the hfVM tissue contains both dopaminergic and serotonergic cells, thus minimizing the serotonergic portion of the graft is seriously suggested to reduce occurrence of GIDs. On the other hand, during processing and preparation of dopaminergic neurons from different sources of stem cells, depletion of serotonergic neurons should be considered as a rule. In addition, stem cell expansion and long-term storage of the grafts before transplantation could reduce the dopaminergic/non-dopaminergic ratio, thus avoiding cell manipulation or long term storage, could help investigators to decrease the incidence of GIDs. An alternative treatment of GIDs is the systemic administration of serotonin 1A agonists, which can reduce transmitter release from serotonergic neurons (11, 87). It also should be noted that, non-motor symptoms such as dementia is not effectively treated by using current medications and DBS (87). Likewise, some patients who received the dopaminergic grafts still suffered from nonmotor symptoms including depression, dementia, visual hallucinations, and sleep disorders. Therefore, cellular therapy for PD needs additional transplantation of serotonergic neurons to relieve nonmotor symptoms (88). There are various trials that have been performed in the mentioned arena using stem cells or hfVM tissue grafts. In some of them the grafts or cells have been implanted unilaterally (84) and in others bilaterally (83, 86, 88, 89) in different parts of the brain such as putamen (86, 88, 89), sublateral ventricular zone (83, 84), and caudate nucleus (88). Additionally, in these trials, the number of transplanted stem cells was 1-2 million cells/Kg of body weight (83, 88). Eventually, results of experimental studies suggest future (stem) cell-based approaches to PD, while there are remained several fundamental questions about the stem cells’ mechanism of action, adverse effects, the best cell source for dopaminergic neurons, as well ethical and safety concerns particularly about embryonic pluripotential stem cells and iPSCs (11, 86). Therefore, stem cell-based therapies for PD are still in its infancy and performing more experimental researches as well clinical trials is crucial for advancement of knowledge in this arena (86).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Seyed Hassan Emami-Razavi, Abbas Norouzi-Javidan, Fereshteh Mohamadi-Jahani, Hanieh Rostamabadi, and Maryam Kavousi for their considerable assistance.
Cite this article as: Goodarzi P, Aghayan H.R, Larijani B, Soleimani M, Dehpour A.R, Sahebjam M, Ghaderi F, Arjmand B. Stem cellbased approach for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2015 (28 January). Vol. 29:168.
References
- 1.Roohani M, Shahidi GA, Miri S. Demographic study of Parkinson’s disease in Iran: Data on 1656 cases. Iranian Journal of Neurology. 2012;10(1-2):19–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Petit GH, Olsson TT, Brundin P. Review: The future of cell therapies and brain repair: Parkinson's disease leads the way. Neuropathology and applied neurobiology. 2014;40(1):60–70. doi: 10.1111/nan.12110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Elahi E. A study on Parkinson's disease in Iranian patients. Genetics in the 3rd millennium. 2009;7(3):1749–52. [Google Scholar]
- 4. Maxwell SC, Marshall K. Stem Cells and Their Potential Role in Treating Parkinson’s Disease.
- 5.Goetz CG, Tanner CM, Levy M, Wilson RS, Garron DC. Pain in Parkinson's disease. Movement Disorders. 1986;1(1):45–9. doi: 10.1002/mds.870010106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1992;55(3):181–4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.3.181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ford B. Pain in Parkinson's disease. Clinical neuroscience (New York, NY) 1998;5(2):63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lane EL, Handley OJ, Rosser AE, Dunnett SB. Potential cellular and regenerative approaches for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment. 2008;4(5):835. doi: 10.2147/ndt.s2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.de Lau LM, Breteler M. Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease. The Lancet Neurology. 2006;5(6):525–35. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70471-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Donovan S. Parkinson's disease treatment. Google Patents. 2003 [Google Scholar]
- 11.Politis M, Lindvall O. Clinical application of stem cell therapy in Parkinson's disease. BMC medicine. 2012;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Marsden C, Parkes J. Success and problems of long-term levodopa therapy in Parkinson's disease. The Lancet. 1977;309(8007):345–9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)91146-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nutt JG, Woodward WR, Hammerstad JP, Carter JH, Anderson JL. The" on-off" phenomenon in Parkinson's disease Relation to levodopa absorption and transport. The New England journal of medicine. 1984;310(8):483. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198402233100802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fahn S, Oakes D, Shoulson I, Kieburtz K, Rudolph A, Lang A. et al. Levodopa and the progression of Parkinson's disease. The New England journal of medicine. 2004;351(24):2498. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa033447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hisahara S, Shimohama S. Dopamine Receptors and Parkinson's Disease. International Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2011;2011 doi: 10.1155/2011/403039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kumar R, Lozano A, Kim Y, Hutchison W, Sime E, Halket E. et al. Double-blind evaluation of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in advanced Parkinson's disease. Neurology. 1998;51(3):850–5. doi: 10.1212/wnl.51.3.850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rodriguez-Oroz M, Obeso J, Lang A, Houeto J-L, Pollak P, Rehncrona S. et al. Bilateral deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a multicentre study with 4 years follow-up. Brain. 2005;128(10):2240–9. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Müller T. Drug therapy in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Transl Neurodegener. 2012;1(10) doi: 10.1186/2047-9158-1-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lundqvist C. Continuous levodopa for advanced Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment. 2007;3(3):335. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lindvall O, Kokaia Z, Martinez-Serrano A. Stem cell therapy for human neurodegenerative disorders–how to make it work. 2004. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 21.Lindvall O, Kokaia Z. Prospects of stem cell therapy for replacing dopamine neurons in Parkinson's disease. Trends in Pharmacological sciences. 2009;30(5):260–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2009.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Arenas E. Towards stem cell replacement therapies for Parkinson’s disease. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2010;396(1):152–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Saberi H, Moshayedi P, Aghayan HR, Arjmand B, Hosseini SK, Emami-Razavi SH. et al. Treatment of chronic thoracic spinal cord injury patients with autologous Schwann cell transplantation: an interim report on safety considerations and possible outcomes. Neurosci Lett. 2008 Sep 26;443(1):46–50. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.07.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Saberi H, Firouzi M, Habibi Z, Moshayedi P, Aghayan HR, Arjmand B. et al. Safety of intramedullary Schwann cell transplantation for postrehabilitation spinal cord injuries: 2-year follow-up of 33 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Nov;15(5):515–25. doi: 10.3171/2011.6.SPINE10917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Aghayan HR, Arjmand B, Norouzi-Javidan A, Saberi H, Soleimani M, Tavakoli SA. et al. Clinical grade cultivation of human Schwann cell, by the using of human autologous serum instead of fetal bovine serum and without growth factors. Cell Tissue Bank. 2012 Jun;13(2):281–5. doi: 10.1007/s10561-011-9250-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Farrell K, Barker RA. Stem cells and regenerative therapies for Parkinson’s disease. Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease. 2012;2:79–92. doi: 10.2147/DNND.S16087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ghodsi M, Heshmat R, Amoli M, Keshtkar AA, Arjmand B, Aghayan H. et al. The Effect of Fetal Liver-Derived Cell Suspension Allotransplantation on Patients with Diabetes: First Year of Follow-up. Acta Med Iran. 2012 Aug;50(8):541–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ardeshirylajimi A, Hagh MF, Saki N, Mortaz E, Soleimani M, Rahim F. Feasibility of cell therapy in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review of 83 studies. International Journal of Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Research. 2013;7(1) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dehghanifard A, Shahjahani M, Soleimani M, Saki N. The emerging role of mesenchymal stem cells in tissue engineering. International Journal of Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Research. 2013;7(1) [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Herberts CA, Kwa M, Hermsen H. Risk factors in the development of stem cell therapy. J Transl Med. 2011;9(1):29. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kitada M, Dezawa M. Parkinson's disease and mesenchymal stem cells: potential for cell-based therapy. Parkinson's disease. 2012;2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/873706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Salehi M, Pasbakhsh P, Soleimani M, Abbasi M, Hasanzadeh G, Modaresi MH. et al. Repair of spinal cord injury by co-transplantation of embryonic stem cell-derived motor neuron and olfactory ensheathing cell. Iranian Biomedical Journal. 2009;13(3):125–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lee S-H, Lumelsky N, Studer L, Auerbach JM, McKay RD. Efficient generation of midbrain and hindbrain neurons from mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature biotechnology. 2000;18(6):675–9. doi: 10.1038/76536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lumelsky N, Blondel O, Laeng P, Velasco I, Ravin R, McKay R. Differentiation of embryonic stem cells to insulin-secreting structures similar to pancreatic islets. Science. 2001;292(5520):1389–94. doi: 10.1126/science.1058866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bishop AE, Buttery LD, Polak JM. Embryonic stem cells. The Journal of pathology. 2002;197(4):424–9. doi: 10.1002/path.1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kim J-H, Auerbach JM, Rodríguez-Gómez JA, Velasco I, Gavin D, Lumelsky N. et al. Dopamine neurons derived from embryonic stem cells function in an animal model of Parkinson's disease. Nature. 2002;418(6893):50–6. doi: 10.1038/nature00900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Roy NS, Cleren C, Singh SK, Yang L, Beal MF, Goldman SA. Functional engraftment of human ES cell–derived dopaminergic neurons enriched by coculture with telomerase-immortalized midbrain astrocytes. Nature medicine. 2006;12(11):1259–68. doi: 10.1038/nm1495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Brederlau A, Correia AS, Anisimov SV, Elmi M, Paul G, Roybon L. et al. Transplantation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell‐Derived Cells to a Rat Model of Parkinson's Disease: Effect of In Vitro Differentiation on Graft Survival and Teratoma Formation. Stem Cells. 2006;24(6):1433–40. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Erdö F, Bührle C, Blunk J, Hoehn M, Xia Y, Fleischmann B. et al. Host-dependent tumorigenesis of embryonic stem cell transplantation in experimental stroke. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 2003;23(7):780–5. doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000071886.63724.FB. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hentze H, Graichen R, Colman A. Cell therapy and the safety of embryonic stem cell-derived grafts. Trends in biotechnology. 2007;25(1):24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Blum B, Benvenisty N. The tumorigenicity of human embryonic stem cells. Advances in cancer research. 2008;100:133–58. doi: 10.1016/S0065-230X(08)00005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Knoepfler PS. Deconstructing stem cell tumorigenicity: a roadmap to safe regenerative medicine. Stem Cells. 2009;27(5):1050–6. doi: 10.1002/stem.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Björklund LM, Sánchez-Pernaute R, Chung S, Andersson T, Chen IYC, McNaught KSP. et al. Embryonic stem cells develop into functional dopaminergic neurons after transplantation in a Parkinson rat model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002;99(4):2344–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.022438099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nishimura F, Yoshikawa M, Kanda S, Nonaka M, Yokota H, Shiroi A. et al. Potential use of embryonic stem cells for the treatment of mouse parkinsonian models: improved behavior by transplantation of in vitro differentiated dopaminergic neurons from embryonic stem cells. Stem cells. 2003;21(2):171–80. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.21-2-171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Takagi Y, Takahashi J, Saiki H, Morizane A, Hayashi T, Kishi Y. et al. Dopaminergic neurons generated from monkey embryonic stem cells function in a Parkinson primate model. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2005;115(1):102–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI21137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fallahi-Sichani M, Soleimani M, Najafi SMA, Kiani J, Arefian E, Atashi A. In vitro differentiation of cord blood unrestricted somatic stem cells expressing dopamine-associated genes into neuron-like cells. Cell biology international. 2007;31(3):299–303. doi: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2006.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nadri S, Soleimani M, Mobarra Z, Amini S. Expression of dopamine-associated genes on conjunctiva stromal-derived human mesenchymal stem cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2008;377(2):423–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.09.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.El-Sadik AO. Potential sources of stem cells as a regenerative therapy for Parkinson's disease. Advances and Applications. 2010;3:183–91. doi: 10.2147/SCCAA.S14626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD. et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. science. 1999;284(5411):143–7. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5411.143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Baksh D, Song L, Tuan R. Adult mesenchymal stem cells: characterization, differentiation, and application in cell and gene therapy. Journal of cellular and molecular medicine. 2004;8(3):301–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2004.tb00320.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fu YS, Cheng YC, Lin MYA, Cheng H, Chu PM, Chou SC. et al. Conversion of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in Wharton's jelly to dopaminergic neurons in vitro: potential therapeutic application for Parkinsonism. Stem cells. 2006;24(1):115–24. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pacary E, Legros H, Valable S, Duchatelle P, Lecocq M, Petit E. et al. Synergistic effects of CoCl2 and ROCK inhibition on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation into neuron-like cells. Journal of Cell Science. 2006;119(13):2667–78. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Park S, Lee KS, Lee YJ, Shin HA, Cho HY, Wang KC. et al. Generation of dopaminergic neurons in vitro from human embryonic stem cells treated with neurotrophic factors. Neuroscience letters. 2004;359(1):99–103. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.01.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhang Z, Wang X, Wang S. Isolation and characterization of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow of patients with Parkinson’s disease. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Animal. 2008;44(5-6):169–77. doi: 10.1007/s11626-008-9093-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Morandi F, Raffaghello L, Bianchi G, Meloni F, Salis A, Millo E. et al. Immunogenicity of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells in HLA‐Class I‐Restricted T‐Cell Responses Against Viral or Tumor‐Associated Antigens. Stem Cells. 2008;26(5):1275–87. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Woodbury D, Schwarz EJ, Prockop DJ, Black IB. Adult rat and human bone marrow stromal cells differentiate into neurons. Journal of neuroscience research. 2000;61(4):364–70. doi: 10.1002/1097-4547(20000815)61:4<364::AID-JNR2>3.0.CO;2-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Li Y, Chen J, Wang L, Zhang L, Lu M, Chopp M. Intracerebral transplantation of bone marrow stromal cells in a 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1, 2, 3, 6-tetrahydropyridine mouse model of Parkinson's disease. Neuroscience letters. 2001;316(2):67–70. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02384-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dezawa M, Kanno H, Hoshino M, Cho H, Matsumoto N, Itokazu Y. et al. Specific induction of neuronal cells from bone marrow stromal cells and application for autologous transplantation. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2004;113(12):1701–10. doi: 10.1172/JCI20935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Honma T, Honmou O, Iihoshi S, Harada K, Houkin K, Hamada H. et al. Intravenous infusion of immortalized human mesenchymal stem cells protects against injury in a cerebral ischemia model in adult rat. Experimental neurology. 2006;199(1):56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Koh SH, Kyung SK, Choi MR, Kyoung HJ, Kyoung SP, Young GC. et al. Implantation of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells as a neuroprotective therapy for ischemic stroke in rats. Brain research. 2008;1229:233–48. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Park HJ, Lee PH, Bang OY, Lee G, Ahn YH. Mesenchymal stem cells therapy exerts neuroprotection in a progressive animal model of Parkinson’s disease. Journal of neurochemistry. 2008;107(1):141–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05589.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kim YJ, Park HJ, Lee G, Bang OY, Ahn YH, Joe E. et al. Neuroprotective effects of human mesenchymal stem cells on dopaminergic neurons through anti‐inflammatory action. Glia. 2009;57(1):13–23. doi: 10.1002/glia.20731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Lanza C, Morando S, Voci A, Canesi L, Principato MC, Serpero LD. et al. Neuroprotective mesenchymal stem cells are endowed with a potent antioxidant effect in vivo. Journal of neurochemistry. 2009;110(5):1674–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Karussis D, Karageorgiou C, Vaknin-Dembinsky A, Gowda-Kurkalli B, Gomori JM, Kassis I. et al. Safety and immunological effects of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Archives of neurology. 2010;67(10):1187. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kopen GC, Prockop DJ, Phinney DG. Marrow stromal cells migrate throughout forebrain and cerebellum, and they differentiate into astrocytes after injection into neonatal mouse brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1999;96(19):10711–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. cell. 2007;131(5):861–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Laurent LC, Ulitsky I, Slavin I, Tran H, Schork A, Morey R. et al. Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. Cell stem cell. 2011;8(1):106–18. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Su P, Loane C, Politis M. The Use of Stem Cells in the Treatment of Parkinsons Disease. Insciences J. 2011;1(3):136–56. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Devine MJ, Ryten M, Vodicka P, Thomson AJ, Burdon T, Houlden H. et al. Parkinson's disease induced pluripotent stem cells with triplication of the α-synuclein locus. Nature Communications. 2011;2:440. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Marchetto MC, Brennand KJ, Boyer LF, Gage FH. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and neurological disease modeling: progress and promises. Human molecular genetics. 2011;20(R2):R109–R15. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007;318(5858):1917–20. doi: 10.1126/science.1151526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Wernig M, Zhao J-P, Pruszak J, Hedlund E, Fu D, Soldner F. et al. Neurons derived from reprogrammed fibroblasts functionally integrate into the fetal brain and improve symptoms of rats with Parkinson's disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105(15):5856–61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801677105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Soldner F, Hockemeyer D, Beard C, Gao Q, Bell GW, Cook EG. et al. Parkinson's disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells free of viral reprogramming factors. Cell. 2009;136(5):964–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Moriguchi H, Chung RT, Sato C. Tumorigenicity of human induced pluripotent stem cells depends on the balance of gene expression between p21 and p53. Hepatology. 2010;51(3):1088–9. doi: 10.1002/hep.23396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ben-David U, Benvenisty N. The tumorigenicity of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2011;11(4):268–77. doi: 10.1038/nrc3034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.McGregor K, Gil J, Lahiri S. A morphometric study of the carotid body in chronically hypoxic rats. respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology. 1984;57:respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology 1984; 57. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1984.57.5.1430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Espejo EF, Montoro RJ, Armengol JA, López-Barneo J. Cellular and functional recovery of Parkinsonian rats after intrastriatal transplantation of carotid body cell aggregates. Neuron. 1998;20(2):197–206. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80449-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Luquin MR, Montoro RJ, Guillén J, Saldise L, Insausti R, Del Río J. et al. Recovery of chronic parkinsonian monkeys by autotransplants of carotid body cell aggregates into putamen. Neuron. 1999;22(4):743–50. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80733-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Nakao N, Shintani-Mizushima A, Kakishita K, Itakura T. The ability of grafted human sympathetic neurons to synthesize and store dopamine: a potential mechanism for the clinical effect of sympathetic neuron autografts in patients with Parkinson's disease. Experimental neurology. 2004;188(1):65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Goetz C, Stebbins G, Klawans H, Koller W, Grossman R, Bakay R. et al. United Parkinson Foundation Neurotransplantation Registry on adrenal medullary transplants Presurgical, and 1‐and 2‐year follow‐up. Neurology. 1991;41(11):1719. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.11.1719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Perlmutter JS, Mink JW. Deep brain stimulation. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2006;29:229–57. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Nyholm D, Odin P. Continuous Intra-intestinal Infusion of Levodopa/Carbidopa in Advanced Parkinson s Disease 2007.
- 83.Venkataramana N, Pal R, Rao SA, Naik AL, Jan M, Nair R. et al. Bilateral transplantation of allogenic adult human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells into the subventricular zone of Parkinson’s disease: a pilot clinical study. Stem cells international. 2012;2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/931902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Venkataramana NK, Kumar SK, Balaraju S, Radhakrishnan RC, Bansal A, Dixit A. et al. Open-labeled study of unilateral autologous bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in Parkinson's disease. Translational Research. 2010;155(2):62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2009.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Morales VD, Zuniga, C. Study to Assess the Safety and Effects of Autologous Adipose-Derived Stromal in Patients With Parkinson's Disease. 2013. Available from: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, accessed in November 08, 2014.
- 86.Lindvall O. Stem cells for cell therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Pharmacological research. 2003;47(4):279–87. doi: 10.1016/s1043-6618(03)00037-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Lindvall O, Björklund A. Cell therapeutics in Parkinson’s disease. Neurotherapeutics. 2011;8(4):539–48. doi: 10.1007/s13311-011-0069-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Politis M, Wu K, Loane C, Quinn NP, Brooks DJ, Oertel WH. et al. Serotonin neuron loss and nonmotor symptoms continue in Parkinson’s patients treated with dopamine grafts. Science translational medicine. 2012;4(128):128ra41–ra41. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Freed CR, Greene PE, Breeze RE, Tsai W Y, DuMouchel W, Kao R. et al. Transplantation of embryonic dopamine neurons for severe Parkinson's disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2001;344(10):710–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103083441002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]