Table 3.
% Relative cutoff of successa (%) | I-TASSER model vs. bound structureb
|
I-TASSER model vs. relaxed structurec
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ER1% (%) | ER5% (%) | ER10% (%) | ER1% (%) | ER5% (%) | ER10% (%) | |
50 | 75 | 70 | 80 | 80 | 85 | 85 |
60 | 65 | 70 | 75 | 75 | 85 | 80 |
70 | 65 | 70 | 65 | 70 | 75 | 75 |
80 | 45 | 60 | 60 | 65 | 65 | 55 |
90 | 40 | 35 | 45 | 60 | 55 | 55 |
100 | 30 | 25 | 25 | 45 | 45 | 50 |
Threshold for success defined as the fraction of the enrichment rate using the I-TASSER model to that using the X-ray bound structure or the relaxed X-ray structure.
The percentage of ER that reach the threshold using the I-TASSER models compared to that using the X-ray bound structure.
The percentage of ER that reach the threshold using the I-TASSER models compared to that using the X-ray structure relaxed by FG-MD.