Abstract
Microbacterium spp. isolated from heavy metal (HM)-contaminated environments (soil and plants) can play a role in mobilization processes and in the phytoextraction of HM. Here, we report the whole-genome sequences and annotation of 10 Microbacterium spp. isolated from both HM-contaminated and -noncontaminated compartments.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Microbacterium spp. have been isolated from diverse environments, including soil, plants, water, and humans (1–4). They belong to the class Actinobacteria, known for the production of a rich spectrum of secondary metabolites, including organic acids, antibiotics, siderophores, and other chelators (5). Interestingly, several Microbacterium spp. have shown to be resistant to different HM and to influence the mobility of HM in contaminated soils (6–8). The influence on HM mobilization might be due to the secretion of specific metabolites, making these bacteria suitable candidates for not only the understanding of metal mobilization processes but also the improvement of phytoextraction techniques limited mainly by the plant biomass production and the rate of metal uptake (9, 10). Bacteria isolated from HM-contaminated environments can overcome these limitations by promoting plant growth and increasing HM availability. Therefore, we decided to sequence a set of Microbacterium sp. genomes of organisms isolated from different HM-contaminated sites in Europe and strains obtained from the DSMZ collection (http://www.dsmz.de/catalogues/catalogue-microorganisms.html). Based on related publications (11–15), we conclude that the DSMZ strains do not derive from HM-polluted environments (Table 1).
TABLE 1 .
Microbacterium sp.a | Isolate | Source | Viral sequence % estimated with PhyloSift | No. of rRNAs in Barrnap/total no.b | No. of tRNAs | No. of ORFsc | G+C content (%) | L50d | N50d | No. of contigs | Total bp | Coverage (×) | Accession no. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
From HM noncontaminated environment | |||||||||||||
M. azadirachtae NR_116502 | DSM 23848 | Rhizoplane of neem (Azadirachta indica) seedlings | 28e | 3/12 | 49 | 3,751 | 70.45 | 12 | 97,758 | 86 | 4,037,586 | 49.69 ± 16.7 | JYIT00000000 |
M. foliorum NR_025368 | DSM 12966 | Phyllosphere of grasses | 10 | 5/11 | 47 | 3,324 | 68.7 | 6 | 151,883 | 46 | 3,558,318 | 74.75 ± 24.7 | JYIU00000000 |
M. ginsengisoli NR_041516 | DSM 18659 | Soil of ginseng field | 24e | 3/3 | 45 | 2,963 | 70.22 | 8 | 145,068 | 80 | 3,047,504 | 71.53 ± 29.4 | JYIY00000000 |
M. ketosireducens NR_024638 | DSM 12510 | Soil | 26 | 3/12 | 49 | 3,481 | 70.27 | 10 | 115,384 | 57 | 3,922,598 | 56.55 ± 21.1 | JYIZ00000000 |
M. trichothecenolyticum NR_044937 | DSM 8608 | Soil | 23e | 3/15 | 48 | 4,074 | 70.16 | 8 | 220,592 | 41 | 4,524,308 | 132.14 ± 42.4 | JYJA00000000 |
From HM contaminated environment | |||||||||||||
M. oxydans JX185498 | BEL4b | Rhizosphere of Brassica napus (Lommel Field, Belgium) | 25 | 3/9 | 49 | 3,589 | 68.27 | 3 | 408,688 | 26 | 3,807,916 | 189.68 ± 47.9 | JYIW00000000 |
M. oxydans JX185498 | BEL163 | Roots of Salix viminalis (Lommel Field, Belgium) | 28e | 4/16 | 44 | 3,545 | 68.03 | 6 | 164,861 | 30 | 3,692,080 | 153.17 ± 50.4 | JYIV00000000 |
M. hydrocarbonoxydans HG941786 | SA35 | Rhizosphere of Alyssum serpyllifolium subsp. lusitanicum (Portugal, Samil, Trás-os-Montes) | 17e | 5/11 | 55 | 3,663 | 68.52 | 3 | 545,806 | 10 | 3,953,585 | 165.98 ± 38.9 | JYJB00000000 |
Microbacterium sp. AB042083 | SA39 | Rhizosphere of Alyssum serpyllifolium subsp. lusitanicum (Portugal, Samil, Trás-os-Montes) | 40e | 4/13 | 50 | 3,732 | 68.26 | 7 | 232,853 | 39 | 3,862,900 | 94.19 ± 27.4 | JXRU00000000 |
M. azadirachtae KF150486 | ARN176 | Soil (Arnoldstein, Austria) | 37 | 3/9 | 40 | 3,910 | 70.14 | 7 | 258,062 | 40 | 4,243,255 | 126.11 ± 36.7 | JYIX00000000 |
The number after the organism name refers to the 16S rRNA gene NCBI accession number of the closest described relative.
Number of rRNAs predicted by Barrnap/number of rRNAs estimated based on the coverage of the contigs containing rRNA genes.
ORFs, open reading frames.
L50 and N50 were calculated using QUAST. N50 is the contig length such that using longer or equal length contigs produces half (50%) the bases of the assembly. L50 is the minimal number of contigs that cover ≥50% of the total length.
Presence of viral sequence confirmed by PHAST.
Genomic DNA was extracted with a phenol-chloroform extraction protocol (16). The Nextera XT kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA) was used for library preparation, and whole-genome sequencing was performed using Illumina MiSeq (MiSeq reagent kit version 3). Raw reads were screened for PhiX contamination using Bowtie2 (17). Adapter and quality trimming were performed in Trimmomatic-0.32 (18). Overlapping reads were subsequently merged using FLASH (19), and long single reads and paired-end reads were assembled with SPAdes 3.1.0 (20). The assembly quality was estimated in QUAST 2.3 (21), and quality control of the mapping data was performed in Qualimap 1.0 (22). PhyloSift version 1.0.1 (23) was used to verify the genome completeness, assessing a list of 40 highly conserved single-copy marker genes, all of which were identified in each assembly. The phylogenetic analysis of the genomes showed no contamination, but a substantial number of viral sequences were detected (10 to 40% of the genome content), which was also confirmed by PHAST (24) for most genomes (Table 1). Moreover, we detected viral sequences in already-published Microbacterium sp. genomes in similar percentages.
Genome annotation (summarized in Table 1) was performed in Prokka (25), incorporating Prodigal 2.60, Aragorn, and Barrnap for the prediction of open reading frames (ORFs), tRNAs, and rRNAs, respectively. rRNA detection was confirmed with RNAmmer 1.2 (26). Using antiSMASH 2.0 (27), we detected gene clusters involved in the production of terpenoids in all sequenced strains, except the colorless isolate ARN176. Clusters involved in the production of polyketides and nonribosomal peptides were found in all strains but in DSM 18659 and in DSM 18659 and BEL163, respectively. A deeper comparison of the Microbacterium genes involved in HM resistance and mobilization is currently being performed and will be published in a subsequent report.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The nucleotide sequences have been deposited at the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession numbers provided in Table 1.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund FWF, project P 24569-B25.
Footnotes
Citation Corretto E, Antonielli L, Sessitsch A, Kidd P, Weyens N, Brader G. 2015. Draft genome sequences of 10 Microbacterium spp., with emphasis on heavy metal-contaminated environments. Genome Announc 3(3):e00432-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00432-15.
REFERENCES
- 1.Soni SK, Singh R, Awasthi A, Kalra A. 2014. A Cr(VI)-reducing Microbacterium sp. strain SUCR140 enhances growth and yield of Zea mays in Cr(VI) amended soil through reduced chromium toxicity and improves colonization of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21:1971–1979. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-2098-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Morohoshi T, Wang WZ, Someya N, Ikeda T. 2011. Genome sequence of Microbacterium testaceum StLB037, an N-acylhomoserine lactone-degrading bacterium isolated from potato leaves. J Bacteriol 193:2072–2073. doi: 10.1128/JB.00180-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ferreras ER, De Maayer P, Makhalanyane TP, Guerrero LD, Aislabie JM, Cowan DA. 2014. Draft genome sequence of Microbacterium sp. strain ch12i, isolated from shallow groundwater in Cape Hallett, Antarctica. Genome Announc 2(4):e00789-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00789-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sharma P, Diene SM, Thibeaut S, Bittar F, Roux V, Gomez C, Reynaud-Gaubert M, Rolain JM. 2013. Phenotypic and genotypic properties of Microbacterium yannicii, a recently described multidrug resistant bacterium isolated from a lung transplanted patient with cystic fibrosis in France. BMC Microbiol 13:97. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nett M, Ikeda H, Moore BS. 2009. Genomic basis for natural product biosynthetic diversity in the actinomycetes. Nat Prod Rep 26:1362–1384. doi: 10.1039/b817069j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kuffner M, De Maria S, Puschenreiter M, Fallmann K, Wieshammer G, Gorfer M, Strauss J, Rivelli AR, Sessitsch A. 2010. Culturable bacteria from Zn- and Cd-accumulating Salix caprea with differential effects on plant growth and heavy metal availability. J Appl Microbiol 108:1471–1484. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04670.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.He CQ, Tan GE, Liang X, Du W, Chen YL, Zhi GY, Zhu Y. 2010. Effect of Zn-tolerant bacterial strains on growth and Zn accumulation in Orychophragmus violaceus. Appl Soil Ecol 44:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Visioli G, D’Egidio S, Vamerali T, Mattarozzi M, Sanangelantoni AM. 2014. Culturable endophytic bacteria enhance Ni translocation in the hyperaccumulator Noccaea caerulescens. Chemosphere 117:538–544. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rajkumar M, Sandhya S, Prasad MN, Freitas H. 2012. Perspectives of plant-associated microbes in heavy metal phytoremediation. Biotechnol Adv 30:1562–1574. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sessitsch A, Kuffner M, Kidd P, Vangronsveld J, Wenzel WW, Fallmann K, Puschenreiter M. 2013. The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils. Soil Biol Biochem 60:182–194. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Lee JS, Lee KC, Saravanan VS, Santhanakrishnan P. 2010. Microbacterium azadirachtae sp. nov., a plant-growth-promoting actinobacterium isolated from the rhizoplane of neem seedlings. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:1687–1692. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.015800-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Behrendt U, Ulrich A, Schumann P. 2001. Description of Microbacterium foliorum sp. nov. and Microbacterium phyllosphaerae sp. nov., isolated from the phyllosphere of grasses and the surface litter after mulching the sward, and reclassification of Aureobacterium resistens (Funke et al. 1998) as Microbacterium resistens comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51:1267–1276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Park MJ, Kim MK, Kim HB, Im WT, Yi TH, Kim SY, Soung NK, Yang DC. 2008. Microbacterium ginsengisoli sp. nov., a β-glucosidase-producing bacterium isolated from soil of a ginseng field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:429–433. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65226-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Takeuchi M, Hatano K. 1998. Proposal of six new species in the genus Microbacterium and transfer of Flavobacterium marinotypicum ZoBell and Upham to the genus Microbacterium as Microbacterium maritypicum comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48:973–982. doi: 10.1099/00207713-48-3-973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Takeuchi M, Hatano K. 1998. Union of the genera Microbacterium Orla-Jensen and Aureobacterium Collins et al. in a redefined genus Microbacterium. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48:739–747. doi: 10.1099/00207713-48-3-739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Le NQ. 2009. Fluorescent Bacillus subtilis biosensors for antimicrobial screening. Ph.D. thesis. Universität Freiburg, Breisgau, Germany. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Magoč T, Salzberg SL. 2011. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27:2957–2963. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.García-Alcalde F, Okonechnikov K, Carbonell J, Cruz LM, Götz S, Tarazona S, Dopazo J, Meyer TF, Conesa A. 2012. Qualimap: evaluating next-generation sequencing alignment data. Bioinformatics 28:2678–2679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Darling AE, Jospin G, Lowe E, Matsen FA IV, Bik HM, Eisen JA. 2014. PhyloSift: phylogenetic analysis of genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ 2:e243 doi: 10.7717/peerj.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhou Y, Liang Y, Lynch KH, Dennis JJ, Wishart DS. 2011. PHAST: a fast phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W347–W352. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lagesen K, Hallin P, Rødland EA, Staerfeldt HH, Rognes T, Ussery DW. 2007. RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35:3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Blin K, Medema MH, Kazempour D, Fischbach MA, Breitling R, Takano E, Weber T. 2013. antiSMASH 2.0—a versatile platform for genome mining of secondary metabolite producers. Nucleic Acids Res 41:W204–W212 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]