Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2015 May 14;3(3):e00446-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00446-15

Genome Sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis Strain Btm27, an Egyptian Isolate Highly Toxic to Cotton Leafworm

Brigida Rusconi a, Yue Chen a, Sara S K Koenig a, Ehab R El-Helow b,c, Mark Eppinger a,
PMCID: PMC4432336  PMID: 25977430

Abstract

Bacillus thuringiensis is a potent microbial control agent against insect pests. Here, we present the draft genome of the Egyptian strain Btm27 that shows high toxicity toward the cotton leafworm. The genome contains three insecticidal genes cry1Ac9, cry2Ab1, and vip3V that have been implicated in conferring toxicity toward lepidoptera.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Bacillus thuringiensis has been successfully used as a biopesticide to control many agricultural pests and insect vectors of human disease (1). The entomopathogenicity of B. thuringiensis is attributed to the expression of a broad variety of species-specific toxic proteins, driven by evolutionary sequence divergence and recombination events (2). These include largely plasmid-borne (3) vegetative insecticidal proteins (Vip), sporulation associated crystal proteins (Cry), and cytolytic toxins (Cyt) (4). Besides its role as biopesticide, further promising biotechnological applications included the production of industrially important enzymes (5) for cytotoxic effects on cancer cells (6). As recently demonstrated by Alfazairy et al. (7), the sequenced Egyptian strain Btm27 is a potent control agent against cotton leafworm. Structural and functional genomic analyses of the strain will allow one to better characterize its insecticidal efficiency and biotechnological potential.

Total genomic DNA was extracted with QIAamp DNA minikit according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform using a paired-end library with 300-bp read length. The draft genome was assembled with Spades 3.0 (8). The average G+C content of 35% and total length of 5,871,441 bp of the obtained Btm27 sequences are in accordance with the findings for other B. thuringiensis genomes (9, 10). All contigs were annotated using the PROKKA annotation pipeline (11) and a total of 5,050 coding sequences, 79 tRNAs, 11 rRNA operons, and four circular plasmids were identified. A BLASTn (9) analysis of the Btm27 contigs against the NCBI nonredundant (nr) database identified B. thuringiensis serovar kurstaki strain YBT-1520 as the closest relative. Draft sequences were further compared at the nucleotide and protein levels against a B. thuringiensis specific plasmid database on the Galaxy platform (10). The results suggest that the Btm27genome is organized into five replicons: a circular chromosome and four plasmids that show high similarity to plasmids pBMB293, pBMB8513, and pBMB400 in B. thuringiensis subspecies kurstaki strain YBT-1520, and pBMB65 in B. thuringiensis subspecies kurstaki strain HD-1. Utilizing BtToxinScanner, we identified three toxin genes in the Btm27 genome and classified them as cry1Ac9, cry2Ab1, and vip (12). The predicted vip coding sequence was further compared to curated Vip proteins in Uniprot (13) and showed 100% identity to Vip3V, which has toxic activity against lepidopteran larvae (14). Interestingly, all three toxins have been demonstrated to be highly active against a range of lepidopteran insect pests (15, 16). The limited variety of insecticidal genes carried by Btm27 suggests that the strain is an ideal candidate for specified pest control preventing unwanted toxic effects on taxonomically unrelated insects. Genome annotation also revealed the presence of genes responsible for the expression of biotechnologically important degradative enzymes, such as chitinases and proteases that cover serine protease, neutral protease, and metalloprotease activities. The availability of the genome sequence of B. thuringiensis strain Btm27 lays the foundation for further structural and functional analyses to fully elucidate its biotechnological potential.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

This genome sequence has been deposited in GenBank under the accession no. JWJY00000000. Strain Btm27 has been deposited into the Bacillus Genetic Stock Center (BGSC) collection as 4AC2.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work received support from the South Texas Center of Emerging Infectious Diseases (STCEID), Department of Biology and Computational System Biology Core at the University of Texas at San Antonio. B.R. was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) Early.Postdoc.Mobility Fellowship (P2LAP3-151770). This collaborative research was also supported by the Fulbright Visiting Scholar Program to E.R.E.

We also would like to acknowledge A. A. Alfazairy (University of Alexandria) for providing strain Btm27, and F. Sanjar and K. A. Rivas (UTSA) for contributing to data analyses.

Footnotes

Citation Rusconi B, Chen Y, Koenig SSK, El-Helow ER, Eppinger M. 2015. Genome sequence of Bacillus thuringiensis strain Btm27, an Egyptian isolate highly toxic to cotton leafworm. Genome Announc 3(3):e00446-15. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00446-15.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bravo A, Gill SS, Soberón M. 2007. Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry and Cyt toxins and their potential for insect control. Toxicon 49:423–435. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.De Maagd RA, Bravo A, Berry C, Crickmore N, Schnepf HE. 2003. Structure, diversity, and evolution of protein toxins from spore-forming entomopathogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Genet 37:409–433. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ibrahim MA, Griko N, Junker M, Bulla LA. 2010. Bacillus thuringiensis: a genomics and proteomics perspective. Bioeng Bugs 1:31–50. doi: 10.4161/bbug.1.1.10519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sanahuja G, Banakar R, Twyman RM, Capell T, Christou P. 2011. Bacillus thuringiensis: a century of research, development and commercial applications. Plant Biotechnol J 9:283–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00595.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vu KD, Yan S, Tyagi RD, Valéro JR, Surampalli RY. 2009. Induced production of chitinase to enhance entomotoxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis employing starch industry wastewater as a substrate. Bioresour Technol 100:5260–5269. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Melo AL, Soccol VT, Soccol CR 29 September 2014. Bacillus thuringiensis: mechanism of action, resistance, and new applications: a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2014.960793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alfazairy AA, El-Ahwany AM, Mohamed EA, Zaghloul HA, El-Helow ER. 2013. Microbial control of the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) by Egyptian Bacillus thuringiensis isolates. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 58:155–162. doi: 10.1007/s12223-012-0193-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Goecks J, Nekrutenko A, Taylor J, Galaxy Team . 2010. Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol 11:R86. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. BioInformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ye W, Zhu L, Liu Y, Crickmore N, Peng D, Ruan L, Sun M. 2012. Mining new crystal protein genes from Bacillus thuringiensis on the basis of mixed plasmid-enriched genome sequencing and a computational pipeline. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4795–4801. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00340-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.UniProt Consortium 2014. Activities at the universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D191–D198. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Doss VA, Kumar KA, Jayakumar R, Sekar V. 2002. Cloning and expression of the vegetative insecticidal protein (vip3V) gene of Bacillus thuringiensis in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif 26:82–88. doi: 10.1016/S1046-5928(02)00515-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Crickmore N, Zeigler DR, Feitelson J, Schnepf E, Van Rie J, Lereclus D, Baum J, Dean DH. 1998. Revision of the nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:807–813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Palma L, de Escudero IR, Maeztu M, Caballero P, Muñoz D. 2013. Screening of vip genes from a Spanish Bacillus thuringiensis collection and characterization of two Vip3 proteins highly toxic to five lepidopteran crop pests. Biol Contr 66:141–149. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES