Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011 Apr 5;97(4):405–413. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.33073

Modulation of mast cell adhesion, proliferation, and cytokine secretion on electrospun bioresorbable vascular grafts

K Garg 1, JJ Ryan, GL Bowlin
PMCID: PMC4432485  NIHMSID: NIHMS302245  PMID: 21472976

1. Introduction

An understanding of how mast cells participate in angiogenesis is important to further our knowledge about vascular development and remodeling1. Mast cells are important to the pathogenesis of allergic, autoimmune and cardiovascular diseases, and cancer. However, in addition to playing a critical role in host defense, they are also involved in various physiological processes such as angiogenesis, tissue remodeling and collagen production2-5.

Biological responses to implanted materials involve neutrophil mediated detoxification, followed by macrophage activity to phagocytize debris and coordinate remodeling events. It was reported by Ashley et al. that these events occur in the presence of both eosinophils and mast cells6. They are known to mediate acute inflammatory responses to the implanted biomaterials7. Mast cell-derived Interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13 were found to induce macrophage fusion while tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) was responsible for biomaterial adherent macrophage apoptosis. IL-4 and IL-13 lead to alternatively activated macrophages which play a role in allergic responses, elimination of parasites and matrix remodeling8. Using implantation of fibrinogen coated polyethylene terephthalate (PET) disks in mice, it was found that this biomaterial triggers the activation of mast cells shortly after implantation, releasing granular products including histamine. Mast cell-deficient mice exhibited reduced phagocyte accumulation on the implants. Administration of histamine receptor antagonists also greatly decreased recruitment and adhesion of neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages to implants9.

Mast cells can be activated by physical stimuli, immunogenic stimuli (Immunoglobulin E (IgE), complement, cytokines and growth factors) and neurogenic stimuli (neuropeptides)2. Exposure of mast cells to an allergen leads to cross linking of the IgE-loaded surface receptor, FcεRI, with at least three biological effects. First, they can undergo degranulation; the process of regulated secretion in which preformed contents stored in their granules are rapidly released by exocytosis. Granule associated mediators include proteases, histamine, proteoglycans and cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-16. Following degranulation is the rapid enzymatic synthesis of lipid mediators derived from precursors stored in the cell membranes and in lipid bodies. These include, the arachidonic acid metabolites prostaglandin (PG) D2, leukotrienes (LT) B4+ and C4, and platelet activating factor (PAF). Lastly, activated mast cells initiate transcription, translation and secretion of a variety of cytokines and chemokines depending on the mast cell type and stimulus. These include, TNF-α, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), stem cell factor (SCF), IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13, IL-14 and IL-16, and chemokines, such as macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α, MIP-1β, T-cell activation gene 3, lymphotactin and monocyte chemoattractant protein -1 (MCP-1)10-13.

Under physiological conditions in several organs, mast cells are found in close vicinity to capillaries and lymphatic vessels and a direct correlation between the number of mast cells and blood vessel density has been demonstrated in the dermis14. Mast cells synthesize several potent angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), heparin, histamine, tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and IL-8. On the other hand, endothelial cells may also express the mast cell growth and chemotactic factor, SCF. This shows that endothelial cells may also elicit mast cell chemotaxis and survival, demonstrating a two way relationship between them15,16. It has been shown that SCF is the primary cytokine involved in mast cell differentiation and activation17-20. SCF (or c-kit ligand) is critical for mast cell survival, as mast cells cultured without SCF undergo apoptosis 21.

In addition to acting on the vasculature, mast cells may augment wound healing by promoting extracellular matrix deposition. In fibroblasts, mast cell extracts elicit collagen synthesis and activate an enzyme involved in matrix remodeling; gelatinase A22.. Similar to mast cell-endothelial cell interactions, mast cells can be attracted to fibroblasts via their SCF expression as both membrane-bound and secreted forms.

In this study, an investigation of mast cell interaction with electrospun scaffolds has been performed. Electrospinning holds the potential to create off-the-shelf bioresorbable vascular grafts as acellular implants that will be degraded gradually over a period of time, leaving behind no permanent synthetic materials to initiate an undesirable immune reaction. Wesolowski et al.23 and Ruderman et al.24 first described the concept of a slowly absorbable graft that allowed in situ regeneration to produce a “neoartery”. These grafts were composed of Dacron and polylactide yarns and were partially bioresorbable. Bowland et al. described the use of Vicryl (a copolymer of polyglycolide and polylactide) as a fully bioresorbable vascular graft25. However, these grafts were susceptible to aneurysm formation. Greisler et al. utilized polydioxanone (PDO) absorbable vascular prosthetics in a rabbit aortic model. The results showed that the myofibroblast migration paralleled the macrophage–mediated degradation of the PDO structure. A confluent endothelial cell lining was present within two weeks. The compliance of the regenerated vascular tissue at one year resembled an artery26.

The biomaterials chosen for this study were polycaprolactone (PCL), PDO, and silk fibroin (silk). PCL exhibits properties (i.e. compliance) that are conducive to arterial tissue engineering with an extended degradation time, and compatibility for endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells27-30. PDO has been extensively studied by our laboratory and has shown promise in vitro28,31-36. Its flexibility, excellent strength retention, shape memory, low inflammatory response and slow degradation rate make it a suitable candidate for vascular tissue engineering. The use of silk as a vascular tissue engineering scaffold has escalated recently. Zhang et al. demonstrated the bioactivity of human aortic endothelial cells and human coronary artery smooth muscle cells on electrospun silk37. It was established by Soffer et al. that electrospun tubular silk constructs can withstand native arterial pressures while behaving in a similar manner to native vessels during creep testing38.

The adhesion, proliferation and cytokine secretion of mast cells on electrospun bioresorbable grafts was investigated in the presence or absence of IL-3, SCF, IgE and IgE with a crosslinking antigen, dinitrophenol-conjugated albumin (DNP). We attempted to modulate the behavior of mast cells on electrospun scaffolds by adding these stimulating agents using tissue culture plastic (TCP) as the control. The stimulating agents were chosen and combined according to their proliferation and attachment-inducing potential. It is widely accepted that IL-3 alone is capable of maintaining mouse mast cell survival. However, SCF is required for mast cell attachment to substrates. The presence of IgE and antigen can further enhance the survival and attachment of mast cells induced by IL-3 and SCF. The results of various studies show conflicting reports on the effects of IgE in the absence of antigen. Its impact on mast cell survival and attachment has not been clearly defined yet 39. Overall, our data demonstrate mast cell adhesion, survival and IgE responsiveness when cultured with bioresorbable polymers, supporting the utility of these polymers in tissue grafts.

2. Materials & Methods

2.1 Electrospinning

Electrospinning was used to generate nanofibrous scaffolds of PCL, PDO, and silk. Silk fibroin was extracted from the cocoons of Bombyx mori silkworms (The Yarn Tree) through an established protocol40. PCL (MW 60,000 kDa, Sigma Aldrich), PDO (Ethicon, Inc.) and silk polymer concentrations used in the study were 250, 100 and 100 mg/ml respectively in 1,1,1,3,3,3, Hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFP) to form flat sheets on a stainless steel mandrel (0.5 cm x 3cm x 15 cm). Disks 6 mm in diameter were punched out of these scaffolds and were placed in a 96 well plate. Fibronectin (100 μl) at a concentration of 50 μg/ml was added on top of the disk and the plate was allowed to sit in the incubator at 37°C for an hour. After an hour, the disks were moved to a new well. The scanning electron micrographs of the uncoated scaffolds are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

SEM images of PCL (left) PDO (middle) and silk (right).

2.2 Cell Culture and Seeding

Bone marrow derived murine mast cells (BMMCs) were derived from C57BL/6 mice as described previously41. Briefly, BMMC cultures were derived from bone marrow harvested from C57BL/6 mouse femurs and tibias (Jackson Labs, Bar Harbor, ME). BMMC cultures were maintained in cRPMI supplemented with IL-3 containing supernatant from WEHI-3B and SCF containing supernatant BHK-MKL cells. The final concentration of IL-3 and SCF was adjusted to 1 ng/ml and 10 ng/ml respectively.42 After 3-4 weeks in culture, these populations were >99% mast cells, as judged by morphology and flow cytometry staining for expression of FcεRI, and Kit (data not shown). The resulting populations were generally used between weeks 4-12. The cells were rinsed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and cultured in complete RPMI (cRPMI) 1640 medium (Invitrogen Life Technologies) (10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 1 mM HEPES; Biofluids), supplemented with 5 ng/ml of IL-3 (R&D systems) and 50 ng/ml of SCF (PeproTech) . The cells were then divided into four groups and cultured for 18 hours in the presence of IL-3 (group 1), IL-3+SCF (group 2) and IL-3+SCF+IgE (1μg/ml, clone C38-2, BD Biosciences) (group 3). After 18 hours, Group 3 was centrifuged and suspended in media containing dinitophenyl-human serum albumin (DNP) antigen (100 ng/ml, Sigma-Aldrich) (group 4). This was done to cross link the IgE-loaded cell surface receptor FcεRI, triggering BMMC activation prior to scaffold seeding.

2.3 Cell Adhesion

Disks 6 mm in diameter were punched from the scaffolds, disinfected (by soaking in ethanol for 10 min followed by repeated rinses in PBS) and placed in a 96 well plate. Each disk was then coated with 100 μl of fibronectin (50 μg/ml) and placed in the incubator at 37°C for an hour. The disks were then moved to a clean well and BMMCs were seeded on fibronectin-coated electrospun PDO, PCL, and silk scaffolds and uncoated tissue culture plastic (TCP) under four different culture conditions. The culture conditions were; cRPMI media supplemented with IL-3 (group 1), IL-3+SCF (group 2), IL-3+SCF+IgE (group 3) and IL-3+SCF+IgE+DNP (group 4) as described in section 2.2. In all groups, mast cells were seeded at a density of 50,000 cells/well with 170 μL of media. The cells were allowed to attach for 7 hours in the incubator. At 7 hours, the cell seeded scaffold was moved to a clean well and the number of attached cells was quantified by MTS assay as described below.

2.4 Cell Proliferation

The numbers of cells on the scaffold were determined with a colorimetric cell titer assay (CellTiter 96® AQueous; Promega Corp., Madison, WI). The assay is composed of solutions of a tetrazolium compound, MTS [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium] and an electron coupling reagent, PMS (phenazine methosulfate). Metabolically active cells convert MTS into the aqueous soluble formazan product. The quantity of formazan product can be measured by the amount of 490 nm absorbance. It is directly proportional to the number of living cells in culture. For this assay, disks 6 mm in diameter were punched from the scaffolds, disinfected (by soaking in ethanol for 10 min followed by repeated rinses in PBS) and placed in a 96 well plate. Each disk was then coated with 100 μl of fibronectin (50 μg/ml) and placed in the incubator at 37°C for an hour. The disks were then moved to a clean well and BMMCs were seeded on fibronectin-coated electrospun PDO, PCL, and silk scaffolds and uncoated tissue culture plastic (TCP) under four different culture conditions. The culture conditions were; cRPMI media supplemented with IL-3 (group 1), IL-3+SCF (group 2), IL-3+SCF+IgE (group 3) and IL-3 + SCF +IgE+DNP (group 4) as described in section 2.2. In all groups, mast cells were seeded at a density of 50,000 cells/well with 170 μL of media. In order to exclude any cells attached to TCP, the scaffold disks were moved to a new well plate and 100 μl of fresh media with 20% MTS solution (20 μl) was added and placed in the incubator for 2 hours. Simultaneously, standards were made with mast cells starting with a concentration 200,000 cells/well to zero (media alone). The number of cells was determined by interpolation from the standard curve by using a log-log fit. The assay was performed on day 1, 3 and 5. Each data point was calculated from triplicate wells.

2.5 Histology

For histological evaluation, disks of PDO, PCL and silk of all four groups were fixed in formalin on day 3. The paraffin embedded disks were cross-sectioned and stained with hematoxlin and eosin (H&E) to examine cell infiltration into the scaffolds.

2.6 Quantification of TNF-α, MIP-1α and IL-13

10 mm disks (disinfected) of fibronectin-coated (50 μg/ml) electrospun PDO and PCL scaffolds were placed in a 48 well plate and an 8 mm cloning ring was placed on top of the scaffolds to retain the cells during scaffold seeding within a defined circumference. Cells were seeded on fibronectin-coated electrospun PDO, PCL, and silk scaffolds and uncoated tissue culture plastic (TCP) at a concentration of ~1×106 cells/ml. Media was added in the center of each scaffold (100 μl of cells in media incubated for 45 min and followed by 200 μl of media). Cell culture supernatants were collected after 24 hours and stored frozen at −20°C until analyzed by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The amounts of TNF-α, MIP-1α, IL-13 (PeproTech) secreted by the mast cells due to their interaction with the electrospun scaffold were quantified by ELISA as per the manufacturer's instructions.

2.7 Statistical Analysis

Data expressed in this paper is in the format of means ± standard error of mean (S.E.M). Data of one representative experiment carried out in triplicates are given. Each experiment was reproduced at least twice. All statistical analysis of the data was based on a Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks and a Tukey-Kramer pairwise multiple comparison procedure (α=0.05) performed with JMP®IN 8 statistical software (SAS Institute). P<0.05 was considered significantly different.

3. Results

3.1 Mast Cell Adhesion and Proliferation

The percentage of adherent mast cells at the end of 7 hours on polymeric scaffolds and TCP are shown in Figure 2. On PCL, PDO and TCP, cells exposed to IgE alone (group 3) displayed greater attachment as compared to group 1 (IL-3) and group 4 (IL-3+SCF+IgE+DNP). Silk exhibited little to no attachment in all groups. SCF +IL-3 (group 2) promoted cell attachment at levels comparable to IgE on TCP and PDO.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Adherent cells expressed as percentage of seeded cells after 7 hours of culture. Symbols ‘Ψ’ indicate a statistically significant difference from group 1 (IL3) and group 4 (SCF+IL-3+IgE+DNP) for a particular material. Symbol ‘Φ’ indicates statistical difference from all groups for that particular material.

Mast cell proliferation on the three scaffolds and TCP was studied at day 1, 3 and 5 with the results shown in Figure 3. Cells stimulated with IgE+DNP (group 4) showed significantly higher proliferation on day 5 as compared to groups 1 and 3 on the PCL and PDO scaffolds. By day 5, the group 4 cells proliferated 2-fold on PCL, 1.7-fold on PDO and 3.3-fold on TCP. Exposure of mast cells to IgE+DNP leads to cross linking of the IgE-loaded surface receptor FcεRI. Figure 3 demonstrates that although mast cells exposed to IgE+DNP initially adhered less than the cells exposed to IgE alone, antigen stimulation allowed for enhanced proliferation and a net gain in cell numbers over the IgE alone group. In fact, IgE in the absence of antigen did not support long-term proliferation and survival of mast cells in this assay. It has been reported that FcεRI aggregation enhances mast-cell proliferation, perhaps owing to the autocrine effects of IL-3 and IL-443. Our data are consistent with these findings.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Mast cell proliferation on scaffolds and TCP. Symbols ‘Ψ’ indicate a statistically significant difference from group 1 (IL-3) and group 3 (SCF+IL-3+IgE) for a particular material. Symbol ‘Φ’ indicates statistical difference from all groups for that particular material.

SCF is a powerful mast cell co-mitogen. Mast cells treated with IL-3+SCF (Group 2) showed a steady increase in proliferation from day 1 to day 5 for the PDO and PCL scaffolds as well as TCP. Two pieces of data from figure 3 were notable. First, IgE crosslinkage was a stronger mitogen than SCF when used in the presence of PDO or PCL. Second, silk not only offered poor adhesion (Figure 2) but also failed to support mast cell proliferation even in response to SCF or IgE crosslinkage. These data demonstrate the differential ability of the polymer substrates to support mast cell adhesion and expansion.

3.2 Histology

H&E staining revealed cell infiltration into the fibrous structures of PDO (Figure 4h) and PCL (Figure 4d) on day 3. Consistent with the poor cell binding in short-term assays, no cells were observed on the silk scaffold using H&E staining (Figure 4i, j, k, l). Mast cell adhesion molecules include various integrins, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM1) and c-kit. It has been shown that mast cells adhere to plate bound laminin, fibronectin and vitronectin only when activated through FcεRI or by pharmacological stimuli such as phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) or calcium ionophore44-47. However, mast cells exposed to only IL-3+SCF attached to the PDO and PCL scaffolds. This proves that a combination of fibronectin, SCF and the scaffold nanostructure can elicit mast cell attachment. Consistent with Figure 2, mast cells exposed to IgE alone attached to the scaffold in greater numbers than IL-3+SCF (Figure 4b, c). It has been demonstrated that IgE primes mast cell adhesion to fibronectin using similar pathways as IgE +Ag48.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

H&E staining of mast cell seeded PCL, PDO and silk scaffolds on day 3. The blue arrows indicate the seeded surface.

As noted when studying proliferation in Figure 3, IgE+DNP stimulation led to the greatest number of adherent mast cells after 3 days of culture with PDO (Figure 4d) or PCL (Figure 4h). The increased number of cells is likely due both to strong adhesion and cell division. The histology analysis also revealed an important difference between the stimuli. In the presence of SCF, mast cells remained largely on the surface of the electrospun scaffold. However, in the presence of IgE+DNP, cellular infiltration dramatically improved. The cells migrated deeper into the fibrous structures of PDO and PCL scaffolds. These data suggest that FcεRI aggregation is a potent stimulus for mast cell attachment, proliferation and migration in the presence of electrospun bioresorbable graft structures.

3.3 Mast Cell Cytokine Secretion

To assess the functionality of mast cells adhered to electrospun scaffolds, we measured cytokine secretion. Mast cells secrete an array of cytokines and chemokines. We chose to measure TNF-α (Figure 5), MIP-1α (Figure 6) and IL-13 (Figure 7), which are well known for their roles in mast cell mediated inflammation49-60. IL-3 alone group and silk scaffold were omitted from this study due to their poor capacity for cell adhesion and proliferation. When compared to the background (media alone), only group 4 cells (IgE + DNP) produced any cytokines on the PDO and PCL substrates. While IL-3 and SCF are strong mast cell mitogens, neither is a potent inducer of cytokine secretion as a sole stimulus. In keeping with this, IgE+DNP was the only stimulus to consistently elicit cytokine production on PDO, PCL and TCP. More importantly, mast cells cultured on PDO or PCL showed similar cytokine responses to the control group cultured on TCP. These data indicate that mast cell adhesion to bioresorbable polymers did not hinder their functionality.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Quantification of TNF-α release by ELISA on day 1. Symbol ‘*’ indicates statistical difference from all groups for that particular material.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Quantification of MIP-1α release on day 1. Symbol ‘*’ indicates statistical difference from all groups for that particular material.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Quantification of IL-13 release on day 1. Symbol ‘*’ indicates statistical difference from all groups for that particular material.

4. Discussion

One of the main requirements of tissue engineered scaffolds is to provide cells with a suitable environment for cell attachment, which is the first step in the cellular growth process. The use of electrospinning for fabricating nanofibrous tissue engineering scaffolds has escalated at a dramatic rate in the recent years. Electrospinning is capable of producing fibers in micro/nanometer range, which mimic the structural dimension of the native extracellular matrix (ECM). The scaffolds produced by electrospinning possess a highly porous microstructure with interconnected pores and extremely high surface-area-to-volume ratio, which is conducive to cellular growth, attachment and organization61. Material interaction with the cells is guided by its physicochemical surface properties62. Surface modifications of the electrospun scaffolds can drastically improve the biological performance while retaining all the nanostructure features and properties63. He et al. fabricated a collagen coated poly (L-lactic acid)-co-poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffold that exhibited enhanced spreading, viability and attachment of endothelial cells (EC)64. It was observed in another study that fibronectin coating of polymeric substrates was required for Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cell (HUVEC) attachment and spreading62. In this study, fibronectin coating was found to be imperative for mast cell attachment and spreading on the electrospun scaffolds (data not shown). Plasma fibronectin modulates the foreign body response and fibrous encapsulation of implanted materials65. Cellular transmembrane integrin receptors recognize the Arginine-Glycine-Aspartic acid (RGD) sequences within fibronectin. Once integrins bind to fibronectin, they activate a cascade of intercellular signaling pathways62,66.

It has been documented that human mast cells attach to fibronectin and vitronectin only when stimulated by phorbol 12-myristate 13 –acetate (PMA) and or/ calcium ionophore45. In another study, it was found that following FcεRI-mediated activation mast cells exhibited flattening and spreading accompanied by cell translocation on laminin, fibronectin and matrigel44. However, in this study mast cells adhered to fibronectin-coated electrospun scaffolds in the presence of SCF and IL-3 without any activation agents. But our data certainly did not refute the importance of mast cell activation in adhesion. In fact, we found that FcεRI aggregation augmented initial adhesion and supported proliferation on electrospun bioresorbable vascular graft materials. IgE binding to mast cells is referred to as a ‘passive presensitization’ step. In this study, IgE in the absence of antigen greatly augmented adhesion but did not support long-term survival and proliferation of mast cells in the absence of antigen. It is important to note that surface FcεRI on mast cells are nearly saturated in vivo. It has been reported previously that more than 80% of mast cell surface FcεRI are occupied by 7 weeks of age in mice67. Therefore, passive presensitization is likely to occur, and may have important effects on mast cell adhesion to grafted polymers.

Xiang et al. showed that the survival effect of FcεRI aggregation occurs due to the expression of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2-family protein A1. Mast-cell survival was abolished in A1a−/− mast cells, and the increase in the number of mast cells that is induced by FcεRI aggregation in vivo was not observed in A1a−/− mice68. In Figure 3, the decline in cell numbers by day 5 suggests that in the absence of antigen, continuous exposure to IgE is required for mast cell survival. In this study, IgE was not added to the culture medium that was used to feed the cells after day 1. It has been proposed that prolonged FcεRI aggregation is required for augmented proliferation of mast cells69. It has been shown that the binding of monomeric IgE to FcεRI does not induce DNA synthesis, but it renders mast cells resistant to apoptosis induced by growth factor deprivation. However, continuous presence of IgE is required for this anti-apoptotic effect39. It can therefore be concluded that the effects of IgE in the absence of antigen are short lived and are more prominent early on as compared to IgE+DNP, which has long-term effects on cells.

It should be noted that the MTS assay cannot efficiently quantify cells that have migrated into the three-dimensional structure of the scaffold and only provides a reliable estimation of the cell number on the surface. The polymeric materials pose unique challenges via various mechanisms including diffusion gradients and sequestering effects. Efforts are underway to validate the modified diphenylamine assay for cell quantification, recently published for use with three-dimensional polymeric scaffolds70.

The physical properties of silk and its ability to promote endothelial cell growth and proliferation make it a promising candidate for vascular tissue engineering scaffolds. However, this study found that silk scaffold with or without fibronectin treatment was not conducive for mast cell adhesion. Our results are consistent with a study conducted by Panilaitis et al. showing that silk was largely inert and even inhibitory with respect to murine macrophage activation71.

Tissue regeneration requires multiple cells and cytokines acting together in concert in a proper sequence. Mast cells stimulated with IgE+DNP on PDO and PCL scaffolds as well as TCP produced high amounts of TNF-α, MIP-1α and IL-13. It has been demonstrated that mast cell derived TNF-α is a crucial component of host defense against bacterial infection and is involved in recruitment of leukocytes by establishing cytokine networks53,54. In healing wounds, MIP-1α plays a critical role in macrophage recruitment. It has been reported that MIP-1α levels increase during the inflammatory phase, and decrease as inflammation resolves and repair proceeds. It is essential for T-cell chemotaxis to inflamed tissue and also plays a critical role in the regulation of trans-endothelial migration of monocytes, dendritic cells, and natural killer cells58-60.

IL-13 was also produced by mast cells adherent to the polymer scaffolds. IL-13 induces expression of endothelial adhesion molecules such as vascular endothelial adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and chemokines which are required for recruitment of granulocytes and monocytes into tissues72. IL-13 stimulates macrophages and fibroblasts to synthesize collagen and promotes fibrosis by stimulating macrophages to produce transforming growth factor (TGF-β)73. These results demonstrate that mast cell cytokine synthesis can influence the biological response of various cell types that play an important part in tissue regeneration and angiogenesis. Improved knowledge of these mechanisms will allow us to control and modulate the reactions occurring at the host/implant interface.

Although many of the differences between human and mouse mast cells appear quite subtle, caution must be observed when interpreting animal model research for use in clinical applications. Animal studies are important in assessing and screening for risks associated with the use of biomaterials in humans. They also help in determining the mechanisms of immune modulation and the cell types affected following biomaterial exposure5,74.

Evaluations that understand the behavior of mast cells on electrospun scaffolds at a molecular level may provide insight into the specific causes of effects observed in these studies. Such evaluations will help biomedical researchers in promoting biomaterial integration with the host tissue without any undesirable immune reactions.

5. Conclusion

The present study examined for the first time the cytokine expression and adhesion of mast cells on bioresorbable electrospun scaffold for potential use as a vascular graft. The study demonstrates that biomaterial exposure can affect mast cell adhesion and cytokine expression. This indicates that mast cells might play a role in the process of biomaterial integration into the host, tissue regeneration, and possibly angiogenesis. Mast cell attachment onto fibronectin coated electrospun scaffolds led to survival and proliferation, and these cells retained their IgE-induced cytokine production. Improved knowledge of mast cell responses to biomaterials will allow a better understanding of the regeneration process and modulation of both acute and chronic inflammation of implanted biomaterials.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by NIH grants AI077435 and AI159638.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Blair RJ, Meng H, Marchese MJ, Ren S, Schwartz LB, Tonnesen MG, Gruber BL. Human mast cells stimulate vascular tube formation. Tryptase is a novel, potent angiogenic factor. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:2691–700. doi: 10.1172/JCI119458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Noli C, Miolo A. The mast cell in wound healing. Vet Dermatol. 2001;12:303–313. doi: 10.1046/j.0959-4493.2001.00272.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hiromatsu Y, Toda S. Mast cells and angiogenesis. Microsc Res Tech. 2003;69:60–64. doi: 10.1002/jemt.10244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rao KN, Brown MA. Mast cells: Multifaceted immune cells with diverse roles in health and disease. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2008;1143:83–104. doi: 10.1196/annals.1443.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maltby S, Khazaie K, McNagny KM. Mast cells in tumor growth: Angiogenesis, tissue remodelling and immune-modulation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1796:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2009.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ashley RA, Palmer BW, Schultz AD, Woodson BW, Roth CC, Routh JC, Fung KM, Frimberger D, Lin HK, Kropp BP. Leukocyte inflammatory response in a rat urinary bladder regeneration model using porcine small intestinal submucosa scaffold. Tissue Eng A. 2009;15:3241–3246. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2008.0699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials. Semin Immunol. 2008;20:86–100. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A, Locati M. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol. 2004;25:677–686. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tang L, Jennings TA, Eaton JW. Mast cells mediate acute inflammatory responses to implanted biomaterials. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:8841–8846. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Metcalfe DD, Baram D, Mekori YA. Mast cells. Physiol Rev. 1997;77:1033–1079. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1997.77.4.1033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mekori YA, Metcalfe DD. Mast cells in innate immunity. Immunol Rev. 2000;173:131–140. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2000.917305.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Galli SJ. Complexity and redundancy in the pathogenesis of asthma: Reassessing the roles of mast cells and T cells. J Exp Med. 1997;186:343–347. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.3.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Galli SJ, Lantz CS. Allergy. Lippincott-Raven; Philadelphia: 1999. pp. 1137–1184. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Eady RA, Cowen T, Marshall TF, Plummer V, Greaves MW. Mast cell population density, blood vessel density and histamine content in normal human skin. Br J Dermatol. 1979;100:623–633. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1979.tb08065.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nilsson G, Butterfield JH, Nilsson K, Siegbahn A. Stem cell factor is a chemotactic factor for human mast cells. J Immunol. 1994;153:3717–3723. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yamaguchi H, Ishii E, Saito S, Tashiro K, Fujita I, Yoshidomi S, Ohtubo M, Akazawa K, Miyazaki S. Umbilical vein endothelial cells are an important source of c-kit and stem cell factor which regulate the proliferation of haemopoietic progenitor cells. Br J Haematol. 1996;94:606–611. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1996.d01-1855.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Coleman JW, Holliday MR, Kimber I, Zsebo KM, Galli SJ. Regulation of mouse peritoneal mast cell secretory function by stem cell factor, IL-3 or IL-4. J Immunol. 1993;150:556–562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Galli SJ, Iemura A, Garlick DS, Gamba-Vitalo C, Zsebo KM, Andrews RG. Reversible expansion of primate mast cell populations in vivo by stem cell factor. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:148–152. doi: 10.1172/JCI116164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Valent P, Spanblochl E, Sperr WR, Sillaber C, Zsebo KM, Agis H, Strobl H, Geissler K, Bettelheim P, Lechner K. Induction of differentiation of human mast cells from bone marrow and peripheral blood mononuclear cells by recombinant human stem cell factor/kit-ligand in long-term culture. Blood. 1992;80:2237–2245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wershil BK, Tsai M, Geissler EN, Zsebo KM, Galli SJ. The rat c-kit ligand, stem cell factor, induces c-kit receptor-dependent mouse mast cell activation in vivo. Evidence that signaling through the ckit receptor can induce expression of cellular function. J Exp Med. 1992;175:245–255. doi: 10.1084/jem.175.1.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Iemura A, Tsai M, Ando A, Wershil BK, Galli SJ. The c-kit ligand, stem cell factor, promotes mast cell survival by suppressing apoptosis. Am J Pathol. 1994;144:321–328. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Berton A, Levi-Schaffer F, Emonard H, Garbuzenko E, Gillery P, Maquart FX. Activation of fibroblasts in collagen lattices by mast cell extract: A model of fibrosis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30:485–492. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00737.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wesolowski SA, Fries CC, Domingo RT, Liebig WJ, Sawyer PN. The compound prosthetic vascular graft: A pathologic survey. Surgery. 1963;53:19–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ruderman RJ, Hegyeli AF, Hattler BG, Leonard F. A partially biodegradable vascular prosthesis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1972;18:30–37. doi: 10.1097/00002480-197201000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bowald S, Busch C, Eriksson I. Arterial regeneration following polyglactin 910 suture mesh grafting. Surgery. 1979;86:722–729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Greisler HP, Ellinger J, Schwarcz TH, Golan J, Raymond RM, Kim DU. Arterial regeneration over polydioxanone prostheses in the rabbit. Arch Surg. 1987;122:715–721. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400180097019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Duling RR, Dupaix RB, Katsube N, Lannutti J. Mechanical characterization of electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL): A potential scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomech Eng. 2008;130:011006. doi: 10.1115/1.2838033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McClure MJ, Sell SA, Ayres CE, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL. Electrospinning-aligned and random polydioxanone-polycaprolactonesilk fibroin-blended scaffolds: Geometry for a vascular matrix. Biomed Mater. 2009;4:055010. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/4/5/055010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Del Gaudio C, Bianco A, Folin M, Baiguera S, Grigioni M. Structural characterization and cell response evaluation of electrospun PCL membranes: Micrometric versus submicrometric fibers. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;89:1028–1039. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pektok E, Nottelet B, Tille JC, Gurny R, Kalangos A, Moeller M, Walpoth BH. Degradation and healing characteristics of small-diameter poly(epsilon-caprolactone) vascular grafts in the rat systemic arterial circulation. Circulation. 2008;118:2563–2570. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.795732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Boland ED, Coleman BD, Barnes CP, Simpson DG, Wnek GE, Bowlin GL. Electrospinning polydioxanone for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 2005;1:115–123. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2004.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Garg K, Sell SA, Madurantakam P, Bowlin GL. Angiogenic potential of human macrophages on electrospun bioresorbable vascular grafts. Biomed Mater. 2009;4:031001. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/4/3/031001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sell SA, McClure MJ, Barnes CP, Knapp DC, Walpoth BH, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL. Electrospun polydioxanone-elastin blends: Potential for bioresorbable vascular grafts. Biomed Mater. 2006;1:72–80. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/1/2/004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Smith MJ, McClure MJ, Sell SA, Barnes CP, Walpoth BH, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL. Suture-reinforced electrospun polydioxanone-elastin small-diameter tubes for use in vascular tissue engineering: A feasibility study. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:58–66. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Smith MJ, Smith DC, Bowlin GL, White KL. Modulation of murine innate and acquired immune responses following in vitro exposure to electrospun blends of collagen and polydioxanone. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;93:793–806. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Smith MJ, White KL, Jr., Smith DC, Bowlin GL. In vitro evaluations of innate and acquired immune responses to electrospun polydioxanone-elastin blends. Biomaterials. 2009;30:149–159. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang X, Baughman CB, Kaplan DL. In vitro evaluation of electrospun silk fibroin scaffolds for vascular cell growth. Biomaterials. 2008;29:2217–2227. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Soffer L, Wang X, Zhang X, Kluge J, Dorfmann L, Kaplan DL, Leisk G. Silk-based electrospun tubular scaffolds for tissue-engineered vascular grafts. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2008;19:653–664. doi: 10.1163/156856208784089607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Asai K, Kitaura J, Kawakami Y, Yamagata N, Tsai M, Carbone DP, Liu FT, Galli SJ, Kawakami T. Regulation of mast cell survival by IgE. Immunity. 2001;14:791–800. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00157-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jin HJ, Chen J, Karageorgiou V, Altman GH, Kaplan DL. Human bone marrow stromal cell responses on electrospun silk fibroin mats. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1039–1047. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00609-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ryan JJ, DeSimone S, Klisch G, Shelburne C, McReynolds LJ, Han K, Kovacs R, Mirmonsef P, Huff TF. IL-4 inhibits mouse mast cell Fc epsilonRI expression through a STAT6-dependent mechanism. J Immunol. 1998;161:6915–6923. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Macey MR, Sturgill JL, Morales JK, Falanga YT, Morales J, Norton SK, Yerram N, Shim H, Fernando J, Gifillan AM, et al. IL-4 and TGF-b 1 counterbalance one another while regulating mast cell homeostasis. J Immunol. 2010;184:4688–4695. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Plaut M, Pierce JH, Watson CJ, Hanley-Hyde J, Nordan RP, Paul WE. Mast cell lines produce lymphokines in response to crosslinkage of Fc epsilon RI or to calcium ionophores. Nature. 1989;339:64–67. doi: 10.1038/339064a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Thompson HL, Thomas L, Metcalfe DD. Murine mast cells attach to and migrate on laminin-, fibronectin-, and matrigel-coated surfaces in response to Fc epsilon RI-mediated signals. Clin Exp Allergy. 1993;23:270–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1993.tb00321.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kruger-Krasagakes S, Grutzkau A, Krasagakis K, Hoffmann S, Henz BM. Adhesion of human mast cells to extracellular matrix provides a co-stimulatory signal for cytokine production. Immunology. 1999;98:253–257. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1999.00865.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Thompson HL, Burbelo PD, Segui-Real B, Yamada Y, Metcalfe DD. Laminin promotes mast cell attachment. J Immunol. 1989;143:2323–2327. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bianchine PJ, Burd PR, Metcalfe DD. IL-3-dependent mast cells attach to plate-bound vitronectin. Demonstration of augmented proliferation in response to signals transduced via cell surface vitronectin receptors. J Immunol. 1992;149:3665–3671. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lam V, Kalesnikoff J, Lee CW, Hernandez-Hansen V, Wilson BS, Oliver JM, Krystal G. IgE alone stimulates mast cell adhesion to fibronectin via pathways similar to those used by IgE þ antigen but distinct from those used by Steel factor. Blood. 2003;102:1405–1413. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Artuc M, Hermes B, Steckelings UM, Grutzkau A, Henz BM. Mast cells and their mediators in cutaneous wound healing—Active participants or innocent bystanders? Exp Dermatol. 1999;8:1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.1999.tb00342.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Compton SJ, Cairns JA, Holgate ST, Walls AF. The role of mast cell tryptase in regulating endothelial cell proliferation, cytokine release, and adhesion molecule expression: tryptase induces expression of mRNA for IL-1 b and IL-8 and stimulates the selective release of IL-8 from human umbilical vein endothelial cells. J Immunol. 1998;161:1939–1946. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Galli SJ, Gordon JR, Wershil BK. Mast cell cytokines in allergy and inflammation. Agents Actions Suppl. 1993;43:209–220. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-7324-6_18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Goebeler M, Schnarr B, Toksoy A, Kunz M, Brocker EB, Duschl A, Gillitzer R. Interleukin-13 selectively induces monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 synthesis and secretion by human endothelial cells. Involvement of IL-4R a and Stat6 phosphorylation. Immunology. 1997;91:450–457. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1997.00263.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gordon JR, Galli SJ. Mast cells as a source of both preformed and immunologically inducible TNF-/cachectin. Nature. 1990;346:274–276. doi: 10.1038/346274a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Malaviya R, Ikeda T, Ross E, Abraham SN. Mast cell modulation of neutrophil influx and bacterial clearance at sites of infection through TNF-a. Nature. 1996;381:77–80. doi: 10.1038/381077a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Norrby K. Mast cells and angiogenesis. Apmis. 2002;110:355–371. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0463.2002.100501.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Walsh LJ, Trinchieri G, Waldorf HA, Whitaker D, Murphy GF. Human dermal mast cells contain and release tumor necrosis factor alpha, which induces endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:4220–4224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.10.4220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.McLachlan JB, Hart JP, Pizzo SV, Shelburne CP, Staats HF, Gunn MD, Abraham SN. Mast cell-derived tumor necrosis factor induces hypertrophy of draining lymph nodes during infection. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:1199–1205. doi: 10.1038/ni1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.DiPietro LA, Burdick M, Low QE, Kunkel SL, Strieter RM. MIP-1a as a critical macrophage chemoattractant in murine wound repair. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:1693–1698. doi: 10.1172/JCI1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Low QE, Drugea IA, Duffner LA, Quinn DG, Cook DN, Rollins BJ, Kovacs EJ, DiPietro LA. Wound healing in MIP-1a(_/_) and MCP-1(_/_) mice. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:457–463. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)61717-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Maurer M, von Stebut E. Macrophage inflammatory protein-1. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:1882–1886. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2003.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Li D, Xia Y. Electrospinning of nanofibers: Reinventing the wheel? Adv Mater. 2004;16:1151–1170. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Campillo-Fernández A, Unger R, Peters K, Halstenberg S, Santos M, Salmerón Sánchez M, Meseguer Dueñas J, Monleón Pradas M, Gómez Ribelles J, Kirkpatrick C. Analysis of the biological response of endothelial and fibroblast cells cultured on synthetic scaffolds with various hydrophilic/hydrophobic ratios: Influence of fibronectin adsorption and conformation. Tissue Eng A. 2009;15:1331–1341. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Liang D, Hsiao BS, Chu B. Functional electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007;59:1392–1412. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2007.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.He W, Ma Z, Yong T, Teo WE, Ramakrishna S. Fabrication of collagen-coated biodegradable polymer nanofiber mesh and its potential for endothelial cells growth. Biomaterials. 2005;26:7606–7615. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Keselowsky BG, Bridges AW, Burns KL, Tate CC, Babensee JE, LaPlaca MC, Garcia AJ. Role of plasma fibronectin in the foreign body response to biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2007;28:3626–3631. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Clark RA. Potential roles of fibronectin in cutaneous wound repair. Arch Dermatol. 1988;124:201–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Odom S, Gomez G, Kovarova M, Furumoto Y, Ryan JJ, Wright HV, Gonzalez-Espinosa C, Hibbs ML, Harder KW, Rivera J. Negative regulation of immunoglobulin E-dependent allergic responses by Lyn kinase. J Exp Med. 2004;199:1491–1502. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Xiang Z, Ahmed AA, Moller C, Nakayama K, Hatakeyama S, Nilsson G. Essential role of the prosurvival bcl-2 homologue A1 in mast cell survival after allergic activation. J Exp Med. 2001;194:1561–1569. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.11.1561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kawakami T, Kitaura J. Mast cell survival and activation by IgE in the absence of antigen: A consideration of the biologic mechanisms and relevance. J Immunol. 2005;175:4167–4173. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.7.4167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Pham EA, Ho WJ, Kamei DT, Wu BM. Modification of the diphenylamine assay for cell quantification in three-dimensional biodegradable polymeric scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;92:499–507. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Panilaitis B, Altman GH, Chen J, Jin HJ, Karageorgiou V, Kaplan DL. Macrophage responses to silk. Biomaterials. 2003;24:3079–3085. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00158-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bochner BS, Klunk DA, Sterbinsky SA, Coffman RL, Schleimer RP. IL-13 selectively induces vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression in human endothelial cells. J Immunol. 1995;154:799–803. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lee CG, Homer RJ, Zhu Z, Lanone S, Wang X, Koteliansky V, Shipley JM, Gotwals P, Noble P, Chen Q, et al. Interleukin-13 induces tissue fibrosis by selectively stimulating and activating transforming growth factor beta(1). J Exp Med. 2001;194:809–821. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.6.809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mestas J, Hughes CC. Of mice and not men: differences between mouse and human immunology. J Immunol. 2004;172:2731–2738. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.2731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES